JURY MEMBERS :

Dr. Maïmouna Bologo/Traoré, Dr. Malicki Zorom, Dr. Yohan Richardson and Mr. Sina Thiam

Recommendations

Following your recommendation, here are the key elements you asked us to revise:

GENERAL SUMMARY

THIS STUDY EXPLORES THE INEQUALITIES AND CHALLENGES IN ACCESS TO DRINKING WATER IN WEST AFRICA, FOCUSING ON THE DISPARITIES BETWEEN SAHELIAN AND COASTAL COUNTRIES. IT USES A MULTI-METHOD STATISTICAL APPROACH COMBINING PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS (PCA) AND FACTOR ANALYSIS OF MIXED DATA (FAMD) TO ANALYZE THE INFLUENCE OF GEOGRAPHICAL, SOCIO-ECONOMIC, AND SECURITY FACTORS ON WATER ACCESSIBILITY. KEY OBJECTIVES • ASSESS HOW CLIMATE, SOCIO-ECONOMIC INDICATORS (HDI, POVERTY, POPULATION GROWTH), AND SECURITY AFFECT WATER ACCESS. • COMPARE SAHELIAN COUNTRIES (E.G., NIGER, MALI, BURKINA FASO) TO COASTAL NATIONS (E.G., GHANA, CÔTE D’IVOIRE, BENIN). • IDENTIFY PRIORITY AREAS FOR POLICY INTERVENTION TO PROMOTE EQUITABLE ACCESS. MAIN FINDINGS • GEOGRAPHIC DISPARITIES: SAHELIAN COUNTRIES FACE SEVERE WATER STRESS DUE TO ARID CLIMATES AND LIMITED INFRASTRUCTURE, WHILE COASTAL COUNTRIES HAVE MORE RESOURCES BUT STILL STRUGGLE WITH URBAN-RURAL INEQUALITIES. • SOCIO-ECONOMIC FACTORS: LOW HDI CORRELATES WITH POOR ACCESS TO WATER AND HIGHER MORTALITY FROM UNSAFE SOURCES. POVERTY AND HIGH POPULATION GROWTH STRAIN EXISTING INFRASTRUCTURE. • URBANIZATION: WHILE IT RAISES WATER DEMAND AND STRESS, IT ALSO IMPROVES INFRASTRUCTURE AND ACCESS IN CITIES. • SECURITY: CONFLICTS IN THE SAHEL DAMAGE INFRASTRUCTURE, DISPLACE COMMUNITIES, AND EXACERBATE INEQUALITIES. • STATISTICAL INSIGHTS: PCA AND FAMD REVEAL STRONG CLUSTERING BY SECURITY LEVEL AND DEVELOPMENT INDICATORS, WITH COUNTRIES LIKE CAPE VERDE STANDING OUT POSITIVELY, AND NIGER AND BURKINA FASO FACING THE MOST CRITICAL CHALLENGES. RECOMMENDATIONS • INVEST IN RESILIENT WATER INFRASTRUCTURE (ESPECIALLY IN SAHELIAN AREAS). • STRENGTHEN GOVERNANCE AND DEVELOPMENT POLICIES TO IMPROVE HDI. • PROMOTE CLIMATE ADAPTATION STRATEGIES LIKE RAINWATER HARVESTING. • FOSTER REGIONAL COOPERATION ON TRANSBOUNDARY WATER MANAGEMENT. CONCLUSION ACCESS TO DRINKING WATER IN WEST AFRICA IS SHAPED BY COMPLEX, INTERLINKED FACTORS. BRIDGING THE GAP BETWEEN SAHELIAN AND COASTAL COUNTRIES REQUIRES INTEGRATED, MULTI-SECTORAL STRATEGIES THAT ADDRESS INFRASTRUCTURE, CLIMATE RESILIENCE, AND GOVERNANCE TO ENSURE SUSTAINABLE AND EQUITABLE WATER ACCESS.

1.INTRODUCTION

Access to drinking water remains a major challenge in several regions of the world, particularly in West Africa. According to the World Health Organization (WHO) and UNICEF (2021) [1], it refers to the availability of safely managed water from an improved source that is accessible, available when needed, and free from contamination. This issue is influenced by various environmental, socio-economic, and security-related factors. To better understand these disparities, we will conduct a Principal Component Analysis (PCA) to identify key determinants of unequal water distribution. However, as our dataset includes both quantitative and qualitative variables, PCA alone is insufficient. Thus, we will apply Multiple Factor Analysis for Mixed Data (FAMD) to integrate categorical variables, offering a more comprehensive analysis of the complex interactions shaping water access. Our study focuses on two main axes:

1.Water Stress and Resource Management Factors:

• Water stress • Integrated Water Resources Management Human Development Index (HDI) • Urbanization rate 2.Socio-Economic and Health-Related Factors: • Poverty rate • Population growth • Deaths linked to unsafe water sources Additionally, we incorporate qualitative variables such as security level, infrastructure quality, and geographical region (coastal vs. Sahelian countries). Precipitation levels and poverty rate are considered supplementary variables to assess how climate and economic disparities impact water accessibility.

A key objective is to determine whether geographical location influences access to drinking water. We will compare Sahelian and coastal countries to analyze how climate, socio-economic conditions, and security levels affect water availability. Given that instability often disrupts infrastructure and services, evaluating these aspects will provide crucial insights into regional disparities and potential solutions.

ISSUES AND RESEARCH QUESTIONS

The core issue addressed in this study is: “How do geographical, socio-economic, and security-related factors collectively shape inequalities in access to drinking water between Sahelian and coastal countries in West Africa?” To comprehensively address this issue, the following research questions guide the analysis:

1.Geographical Disparities:

🔹 How do climatic conditions (e.g., rainfall variability, water stress) differentially impact water accessibility in Sahelian versus coastal countries? 🔹 To what extent does geographical location (arid Sahel vs. humid coast) determine the availability of surface and groundwater resources?

2.Socio-Economic Determinants:

🔹 How do key socio-economic indicators (HDI, poverty rate, urbanization) correlate with disparities in access to improved water sources? 🔹 Why do some countries with similar economic profiles exhibit divergent outcomes in water access?

3.Security and Infrastructure:

🔹 How do conflicts and instability in the Sahel disrupt water infrastructure and exacerbate inequalities compared to more stable coastal regions? 🔹 What role does infrastructure quality play in mediating the relationship between water stress and actual access? Policy-Relevant Insights: Which determinants (e.g., climate resilience, governance, investment) should be prioritized to reduce inequalities between regions?

LITERATURE REVIEW

I.1 PRESENTATION OF THE STUDY AREA: WEST AFRICAN COUNTRIES

West Africa consists of 16 countries, including Benin, Burkina Faso, Cape Verde, Côte d’Ivoire, The Gambia, Ghana, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Liberia, Mali, Mauritania, Niger, Nigeria, Senegal, Sierra Leone, and Togo. This region is characterized by significant geographical, climatic, and socio-economic diversity, leading to disparities in access to drinking water. Despite various initiatives, many countries still face water scarcity, infrastructure deficits, and governance challenges that limit equitable access to safe drinking water.

I.2 GEOGRAPHICAL AND CLIMATIC CONTEXT

West Africa spans from the Sahara Desert in the north to tropical forests in the south, exposing it to diverse climatic conditions. These variations significantly influence water resource availability, with arid Sahelian regions suffering from chronic water shortages, while coastal areas benefit from higher rainfall and surface water sources.

🔹 Sahelian Countries (e.g., Mali, Niger, Burkina Faso): • Low annual rainfall and high evaporation rates, leading to water stress. Dependence on groundwater and seasonal water bodies. Climate change aggravates desertification, reducing water availability. • Coastal Countries (e.g., Ghana, Côte d’Ivoire, Guinea, Benin): Abundant rainfall and river systems providing more stable water sources. Higher urbanization, requiring more advanced water distribution networks. Vulnerability to flooding, which can contaminate water sources ** Impact of Climate Change

Climate change is intensifying extreme weather events, increasing the frequency of droughts in the Sahel and flooding in coastal areas, further complicating water management strategies.

I.3 SPECIFIC CHALLENGES

West African countries face several structural and environmental challenges affecting access to drinking water:

🔹 Water Stress In Sahelian regions, water demand exceeds available resources, making water management highly complex. Even in coastal regions, growing urban populations increase pressure on water supply systems. 🔹 Failing Infrastructure Many countries lack the necessary investment in water treatment plants, pipelines, and boreholes. In rural areas, over 40% of water points are non-functional due to poor maintenance[2] 🔹 Insecurity and Conflict Armed conflicts in Mali, Burkina Faso, and Niger destroy water infrastructure and prevent development projects. Attacks on civilian infrastructure (water points, wells, pipelines) have increased in recent years [3] Key Question: How do these challenges vary between Sahelian and coastal countries?

I.4 KEY CONCEPTS AND DEFINITIONS

🔹 Access to Drinking Water

According to the World Health Organization (WHO), access to drinking water refers to the availability of improved water sources that are protected from contamination and accessible in sufficient quantity. 🔹 Water Stress

Occurs when water demand surpasses available renewable resources. A country is considered to experience water stress if this ratio exceeds [4]

🔹 Population Growth West Africa’s high population growth rate (~2.7% annually) puts increasing pressure on water resources, especially in urban and semi-urban areas [6].

🔹 Quality of Hydraulic Infrastructure

Refers to the efficiency and maintenance of water distribution networks, boreholes, and treatment plants. Deficient infrastructure leads to water loss, contamination, and restricted access.

🔹 Urbanization

The rapid shift from rural to urban areas increases water demand, requiring better resource planning [7].

📌 Next Step: How do these variables interact in the analysis?

4. METHODOLOGY

I.1 TOOLS AND SOFTWARE

Various tools were employed for data collection, analysis, and visualization: • Microsoft Excel 📊 → Extracting and structuring the data matrix. • QGIS 🗺️ → Creating thematic maps of the studied variables. • RStudio (FactoMineR, ggplot2) 📈 → Principal Component Analysis (PCA), clustering, and statistical visualization. • Zotero 📚 → Managing bibliographic references. • Kobotoolbox 📡 → Deploying data collection tools in the field.

I.2 SELECTION OF VARIABLES

The selection of variables plays a crucial role in analyzing the inequalities and challenges of access to drinking water in West Africa. This study incorporates both quantitative and qualitative variables to provide a comprehensive understanding of the issue.

1. Factors Related to Water Stress and Resource Management

Water Stress

when water demand exceeds the available supply, leading to shortages. According to Our World in Data, West Africa experiences severe water stress due to climate variability, population growth, and inefficient water management (Ritchie & Roser, 2019). Countries such as Burkina Faso and Niger have renewable water resources below 1,000 m³ per capita per year, classifying them as water-scarce nations [8].

- Human Development Index (HDI):

the Human Development Index (HDI) scores across West African countries in 2022. It reveals a generally low level of human development in the region, with most countries falling below 0.57 (or 57%). Countries such as Mali, Niger, and Burkina Faso are in the lowest HDI range (39–48%), reflecting persistent challenges in education, health, and income. Ghana, standing out with an HDI between 57% and 66%, is the only country in the region to reach a relatively higher level of human development. This spatial disparity highlights the need for targeted development strategies and stronger investment in human capital across the region. *

Urbanization Rate

Urbanization affects water accessibility, as rapid growth often leads to unplanned settlements with poor infrastructure. In West Africa, the urbanization rate has increased from 30% in 1990 to 47% in 2022. However, many peri-urban areas lack piped This map illustrates the urbanization rate in West African countries for the year 2022. The data reveals a marked contrast between countries, with Nigeria, Ghana, and Côte d’Ivoire showing higher urbanization levels (above 50%), reflecting growing urban centers and migration trends. On the other end, countries like Niger and Burkina Faso remain largely rural, with urbanization rates below 34%. These disparities point to uneven urban development in the region and raise concerns about infrastructure, planning, and service delivery in rapidly urbanizing areas.[10]

2. Socio-Economic Factors and Their Impacts

Poverty Rate

The affordability of drinking water is a major challenge in West Africa. Studies show that households in the lowest income quartile spend up to 20% of their income on water, compared to only 3% in wealthier groups. In rural Mali, for instance, water scarcity forces families to buy water at 4–10 times the official tariff, exacerbating economic inequalities[11].

Population Growth

West Africa has one of the highest population growth rates globally, with an annual increase of 2.7% This rapid growth increases demand for water while infrastructure struggles to keep up, leading to shortages and unequal distribution[12].

Deaths Linked to Unsafe Water Sources

According to WHO data, contaminated water causes 70,000 deaths annually in West Africa, primarily due to waterborne diseases
such as cholera and dysentery (WHO, 2022). The situation is critical in countries like Nigeria and Sierra Leone, where unsafe drinking water accounts for over 10% of child mortality [13].

The percentage of the population in West African countries without access to improved water sources in 2022. It highlights significant disparities across the region, with countries like Guinea, Sierra Leone, and Niger showing the highest rates of water insecurity (above 21.7%). In contrast, Senegal, Mali, and Ghana have relatively better access levels, with less than 12.3% of the population affected. This spatial distribution underlines the urgent need for targeted investments in water infrastructure, especially in countries facing critical access challenges.

Security Level

Water access is often compromised in conflict-affected regions. In the Sahel, water infrastructure is frequently targeted in armed conflicts, leaving millions without safe drinking water Studies show that in regions like northern Mali, insecurity reduces water supply coverage by up to 40% due to damaged infrastructure and displacement[14].

Integrated Water Resources Management (IWRM)

is defined by the Global Water Partnership (2000) as “a process which promotes the coordinated development and management of water, land and related resources, in order to maximize the resultant economic and social welfare in an equitable manner without compromising the sustainability of vital ecosystems[15]. In West Africa, the implementation of IWRM is both a regional and national priority, driven by increasing water demand, climate variability, urbanization, and environmental degradation. Since 1998, the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS), through its sub-agency Water Resources Coordination Centre (WRCC), has played a key role in coordinating IWRM policies and strategies across member states[16]. In 2003, the Regional Action Plan for IWRM in West Africa was adopted with the objective of promoting sustainable water governance at the basin level, ensuring transboundary cooperation, and strengthening institutional frameworks [17]. This map shows the implementation level of Integrated Water Resources Management (IWRM) in West African countries as of 2022. The IWRM index highlights disparities in water governance across the region. Countries such as Ghana, Togo, and Benin demonstrate relatively high levels of integration (above 54%), indicating significant efforts toward sustainable water resource management. On the other hand, countries like Liberia, Sierra Leone, and Guinea show lower performance (below 38%), reflecting challenges in policy coordination, institutional frameworks, and infrastructure. Strengthening IWRM remains a key priority to ensure water security and achieve long-term development goals in the region.

This spatial variation illustrates the disparities in institutional capacity, political will, and financial resources across the region. It also highlights the importance of regional cooperation in addressing shared water challenges, especially in transboundary river basins such as the Niger, Volta, and Senegal rivers. Efforts toward achieving Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 6.5, which calls for full implementation of IWRM at all levels by 2030, remain ongoing. Continued support from regional bodies, international partners, and national governments is essential to accelerate progress.

4. Additional Context: Precipitation Levels and Their Impact

Rainfall variability significantly affects water availability. In coastal West Africa, average annual precipitation exceeds 1,500 mm, whereas the Sahel receives less than 300 mm, leading to droughts and seasonal shortages. Climate change is expected to further intensify rainfall variability, exacerbating water insecurity[18].

Conclusion

By integrating these variables, this study aims to highlight the structural inequalities affecting access to drinking water in West Africa. Addressing these challenges requires a multi-sectoral approach, combining investment in infrastructure, socio-economic policies, and climate resilience strategies to ensure equitable water access for all.

I.3 CRITERIA FOR VARIABLE SELECTION

To ensure a robust analysis, variables were selected based on the following criteria: 📌 Relevance → They are directly related to inequalities in access to drinking water. 📌 Data Availability → Sourced from reliable institutions (World Bank, WHO, UNICEF, FAO). 📌 Geographical Representativeness → Reflects both urban and rural realities. 📌 Analytical Potential → Suitable for PCA and clustering analysis.

I.4 TARGET POPULATION

This study focuses on 16 West African countries, categorized into two geographical groups: • Sahelian Countries (Mali, Niger, Burkina Faso, Mauritania) High water stress. Reliance on groundwater and aquifers. Limited infrastructure. • Coastal Countries (Côte d’Ivoire, Ghana, Benin, Togo, Senegal, Liberia, Sierra Leone, Guinea) Abundant rainfall. Easier access to surface water. More developed infrastructure, but significant inequalities. 📌 Why this distinction? This classification allows us to test whether geographic location influences disparities in access to drinking water

Suggested Table: Comparing Sahelian vs. Coastal Countries Factor Sahelian Countries Coastal Countries Water Availability Scarce, groundwater-dependent Higher due to surface water sources Rainfall [19] Low (<500 mm/year) High (>1,000 mm/year) Water Stress Severe, exceeding 25% of available resources Moderate to low Infrastructure Quality Poor, lack of investment More developed, but urban-rural disparities Urbanization Rate Low to moderate High, rapid urban expansion Poverty Rate High, limiting access to water services Varies, but generally lower than in Sahelian countries Security Issues Frequent conflicts affecting water access More stable but some regions still affected Main Water Source Groundwater (wells, boreholes) Surface water (rivers, lakes, rainfall collection) Why this table? It summarizes key differences between Sahelian and Coastal countries. It reinforces the justification for PCA analysis by showing the expected contrasts in water access factors. It provides a quick reference for readers before diving into the statistical analysise

ANALYSIS OF GRAPHS ON WATER ACCESS AND KEY INDICATORS: SAHELIAN VS. COASTAL COUNTRIES

The following graphs were generated using R Studio based on data collected from Our World in Data and the World Bank, dating from 2022. They provide a comparative analysis of Sahelian and coastal countries in terms of water access and key socio-economic indicators

COMPARISON OF KEY INDICATORS: SAHELIAN VS. COASTAL COUNTRIES

This graph compares four key indicators between Sahelian and coastal countries:

library(ggplot2)
# Creating the dataset Comparison of Key Indicators: Sahelian vs. Coastal Countries
data <- data.frame(
  Factor = rep(c("Water Stress", "Urbanization Rate", "HDI", "Poverty Rate"), 2),
  Value = c(80, 40, 0.45, 60, 50, 70, 0.65, 30), # Example values
  Region = rep(c("Sahelian", "Coastal"), each = 4)
)
ggplot(data, aes(x = Factor, y = Value, fill = Region)) +
  geom_bar(stat = "identity", position = "dodge", width = 0.6) +
  theme_minimal() +
  labs(title = "Comparison of Key Indicators: Sahelian vs. Coastal Countries",
       x = "Indicator",
       y = "Value (%) or Index") +
  scale_fill_manual(values = c("Sahelian" = "red", "Coastal" = "blue")) +
  theme(axis.text.x = element_text(angle = 45, hjust = 1))

Human Development Index (HDI): Very low in both regions, with a slight advantage for coastal countries. Poverty Rate: Significantly higher in Sahelian countries compared to coastal ones. Urbanization Rate: Higher in coastal countries, reflecting better urban infrastructure. Water Stress: More severe in Sahelian countries, indicating greater difficulties in accessing water. 📌 Interpretation Sahelian countries face major challenges related to poverty and water stress, with lower urbanization rates limiting infrastructure and public services.

INTRODUCTION TO PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS (PCA)

Objective of PCA: • Reduce the dimensionality of the dataset. • Identify the most influential factors differentiating Sahelian and Coastal countries. • Explore relationships between indicators. 🔹 Presentation of the Data Used

• Description of active and supplementary variables. • Data sources (Our World in Data, World Bank, 2022)

library(FactoMineR)
library(Factoshiny)
## Le chargement a nécessité le package : shiny
## Le chargement a nécessité le package : FactoInvestigate
library(prettyR)
library(FactoInvestigate)
library(factoextra)
## Welcome! Want to learn more? See two factoextra-related books at https://goo.gl/ve3WBa
library(GPArotation) 
library(rsconnect)
## 
## Attachement du package : 'rsconnect'
## L'objet suivant est masqué depuis 'package:shiny':
## 
##     serverInfo
library(ggplot2)
library(corrplot)
## corrplot 0.95 loaded
library(RColorBrewer)
library(ggrepel)
VE<-read.csv(file="C:\\Users\\hp14p\\Desktop\\projet\\seydou\\Variable.csv", header = TRUE, sep = ";", 
             dec = ".",row.names = 1)
summary(VE)
##       IDH          Poverty_Rate   Population.growth  Deaths._LUWS  
##  Min.   :0.3940   Min.   : 4.60   Min.   :0.600     Min.   :0.900  
##  1st Qu.:0.4677   1st Qu.:12.41   1st Qu.:2.208     1st Qu.:1.675  
##  Median :0.4995   Median :21.22   Median :2.330     Median :2.600  
##  Mean   :0.5056   Mean   :20.60   Mean   :2.337     Mean   :2.550  
##  3rd Qu.:0.5417   3rd Qu.:26.45   3rd Qu.:2.527     3rd Qu.:3.125  
##  Max.   :0.6610   Max.   :50.61   Max.   :3.250     Max.   :5.300  
##   Water.Stress         GIRE       urbanization_Rate  precipations 
##  Min.   : 0.260   Min.   :22.00   Min.   :17.00     Min.   :  70  
##  1st Qu.: 1.468   1st Qu.:39.25   1st Qu.:43.00     1st Qu.: 513  
##  Median : 5.700   Median :50.50   Median :49.00     Median : 995  
##  Mean   : 9.052   Mean   :48.38   Mean   :47.69     Mean   :1024  
##  3rd Qu.:10.008   3rd Qu.:56.25   3rd Qu.:54.00     3rd Qu.:1315  
##  Max.   :57.180   Max.   :70.00   Max.   :67.00     Max.   :2756  
##  Pop_no_improved_water
##  Min.   : 2.705       
##  1st Qu.:11.528       
##  Median :16.221       
##  Mean   :16.819       
##  3rd Qu.:22.956       
##  Max.   :31.471

DESCRIBE

describe(VE)
## Description of VE
## 
##  Numeric 
##                          mean median       var     sd valid.n
## IDH                      0.51   0.50      0.00   0.07      16
## Poverty_Rate            20.60  21.22    137.80  11.74      16
## Population.growth        2.34   2.33      0.34   0.58      16
## Deaths._LUWS             2.55   2.60      1.18   1.09      16
## Water.Stress             9.05   5.70    188.45  13.73      16
## GIRE                    48.38  50.50    196.65  14.02      16
## urbanization_Rate       47.69  49.00    149.30  12.22      16
## precipations          1023.56 995.00 547652.53 740.04      16
## Pop_no_improved_water   16.82  16.22     63.78   7.99      16
AZ<-read.csv(file="C:\\Users\\hp14p\\Desktop\\last .csv", header = TRUE, sep = ";", 
             dec = ".",row.names = 1)

mat_cor<-cor(AZ[,1:7], y = NULL, use = "everything",
             method = c("pearson"))
mat_cor
##                          IDH Poverty_Rate Population.growth Deaths._LUWS
## IDH                1.0000000   -0.4646626       -0.75455438  -0.68725203
## Poverty_Rate      -0.4646626    1.0000000        0.32022214   0.81868462
## Population.growth -0.7545544    0.3202221        1.00000000   0.50548540
## Deaths._LUWS      -0.6872520    0.8186846        0.50548540   1.00000000
## Water.Stress       0.5827077   -0.3648682       -0.65149460  -0.38825720
## GIRE               0.2241680   -0.1618883       -0.05193968  -0.07038117
## urbanization_Rate  0.7622117   -0.7014319       -0.60289152  -0.82155194
##                   Water.Stress        GIRE urbanization_Rate
## IDH                  0.5827077  0.22416802        0.76221167
## Poverty_Rate        -0.3648682 -0.16188834       -0.70143191
## Population.growth   -0.6514946 -0.05193968       -0.60289152
## Deaths._LUWS        -0.3882572 -0.07038117       -0.82155194
## Water.Stress         1.0000000  0.40991655        0.35915729
## GIRE                 0.4099166  1.00000000       -0.03856747
## urbanization_Rate    0.3591573 -0.03856747        1.00000000
corrplot(
  mat_cor,
  method ="color",
  type = "upper",
  addCoef.col ="black")

INTERPRETATION OF THE CORRELATION MATRIX

This correlation matrix shows the relationships between different variables related to access to drinking water, urbanization, and socio-economic factors. The values range from -1 to 1, where: • 1 indicates a perfect positive correlation (strong direct relationship). • -1 indicates a perfect negative correlation (strong inverse relationship). • 0 indicates no correlation (no direct relationship). Key Observations: 1. Human Development Index (IDH)

o Negatively correlated with Population Growth (-0.75) → Countries with higher HDI tend to have lower population growth. o Negatively correlated with Deaths linked to unsafe water sources (-0.69) → A higher HDI is associated with lower water-related mortality. o Positively correlated with Water Stress (0.58) → More developed countries may experience greater water stress, possibly due to higher demand and industrialization. o Positively correlated with Urbanization Rate (0.76) → Urbanized countries tend to have higher HDI. o Negatively correlated with Population without improved water (-0.64) → Higher HDI leads to better access to improved water sources. 2. Population Growth

o Positively correlated with Deaths linked to unsafe water sources (0.51) → Higher population growth is linked to higher water-related mortality, likely due to inadequate water infrastructure. o Negatively correlated with Water Stress (-0.65) → Higher population growth occurs in areas with lower water stress, suggesting that water availability influences settlement patterns. o Negatively correlated with Urbanization Rate (-0.60) → Rapid population growth is more common in rural areas. o Positively correlated with Population without improved water (0.54) → Higher population growth is associated with more people lacking access to improved water sources.

  1. Deaths Linked to Unsafe Water Sources

o Positively correlated with Population without improved water (0.83) → Areas with poor water access experience higher mortality rates.

o Negatively correlated with Urbanization Rate (-0.82) → More urbanized areas have lower water-related mortality, likely due to better infrastructure. 4. Water Stress

o Positively correlated with Urbanization Rate (0.36) → Urbanization increases water demand, leading to greater water stress. o Negatively correlated with Population without improved water (-0.51) → Countries with higher water stress seem to have better water access, possibly because they invest more in water infrastructure . 5. Integrated Water Resources Management (GIRE)

o Weak correlations with most variables, meaning it does not have a strong direct impact on the other factors analyzed.

  1. Urbanization Rate

o Negatively correlated with Population without improved water (-0.78) → More urbanized countries have better access to improved water sources.

  1. Population Without Improved Water

o Strongly correlated with water-related deaths (0.83) → Poor access to clean water is a major factor in mortality.

Key Insights:

• Higher HDI and higher urbanization rates are associated with better access to improved water sources and lower water-related mortality. • High population growth tends to correlate with poor water access and higher mortality rates. • Water stress does not necessarily mean poor water access, as urbanized and developed areas tend to manage water resources better. This analysis helps identify priority areas for intervention, such as improving water access in high-growth, low-HDI rural regions to reduce mortality.

INTERPRETATION OF correlation circle:

RTI<-read.csv(file="C:\\Users\\hp14p\\Desktop\\VariableSUPP.csv", header = TRUE, sep = ";", 
             dec = ".",row.names = 1)
RTI_scaled <- scale(RTI)
res.pca <- PCA(RTI_scaled, graph = FALSE)
fviz_pca_var(res.pca, col.var = "cos2", repel = TRUE, title = "Corrélations des variables")

PCA Interpretation – Correlation Circle

After removing Cape Verde and Niger (which became an outlier in the second PCA), we obtained the following result:

The Principal Component Analysis (PCA) reveals two major dimensions that explain 65.24% of the total variance in the dataset: - Dimension 1 (40.31%) - Dimension 2 (24.93%)

These two axes summarize the most important patterns that distinguish countries in terms of water access and development indicators.

🔹 Dimension 1: Development and Water Access Gradient

This axis primarily opposes: - ➖ On the left side:
- Population without improved water sources (Pop_no_improved_water)
- Deaths due to unsafe water sources (Deaths._LUWS)

  • ➕ On the right side:
    • Human Development Index (IDH)
    • Urbanization Rate

Interpretation:
Dimension 1 reflects a development gradient. Countries with high values on this axis tend to be more urbanized, better developed, and have lower mortality linked to poor water access.
Countries with low values on this axis suffer from inadequate infrastructure, low HDI, and poor water access.

🔹 Dimension 2: Demographic and Hydric Pressure

This axis is dominated by: - Population Growth (Pop_growth) - Water Stress - IWRM Score (GIRE)

Interpretation:
Dimension 2 represents stress on water systems due to demographic growth and the capacity of water governance. Countries with high scores on this axis are facing rapid population growth, increasing water demand, and often have higher hydric pressure.

Summary of Variable Contributions

Variable Dim.1 Contribution (%) cos² (Dim.1) Dim.2 Contribution (%) cos² (Dim.2)
Pop_no_improved_water 25.43 0.718 0.00 0.000
Deaths._LUWS 24.72 0.698 0.00 0.001
Urbanization_Rate 21.01 0.593 9.08 0.158
IDH 15.53 0.438 7.30 0.127
Pop_growth 0.08 0.002 34.05 0.594
GIRE 1.50 0.042 27.22 0.475
Water_Stress 11.71 0.330 22.35 0.390

This PCA interpretation helps visualize how different indicators interact and drive inequalities in access to drinking water across West African countries.

INTERPRETATION OF THE PCA INDIVIDUALS

# Importer les données
RTI <- read.csv("C:/Users/hp14p/Desktop/VariableSUPP.csv", 
                header = TRUE, sep = ";", dec = ".", row.names = 1)

# Réaliser l'ACP
res.pca <- PCA(RTI, graph = FALSE)

# Réaliser la classification hiérarchique sur les composantes principales
res.hcpc <- HCPC(res.pca, graph = FALSE)

# Afficher le dendrogramme
fviz_dend(res.hcpc,
          rect = TRUE,
          show_labels = TRUE,
          main = "Hierarchical Clustering Dendrogram",
          cex = 1.2)
## Warning: The `<scale>` argument of `guides()` cannot be `FALSE`. Use "none" instead as
## of ggplot2 3.3.4.
## ℹ The deprecated feature was likely used in the factoextra package.
##   Please report the issue at <https://github.com/kassambara/factoextra/issues>.
## This warning is displayed once every 8 hours.
## Call `lifecycle::last_lifecycle_warnings()` to see where this warning was
## generated.

INTERPRETATION OF THE HIERARCHICAL CLUSTERING DENDROGRAM

After removing Cape Verde and Niger (which became an outlier in the second PCA), and performing a third PCA, the hierarchical clustering (dendrogram) was applied to the updated dataset. This produced two clearly distinct and interpretable clusters.

Overview of the Method

The hierarchical clustering was based on the PCA coordinates of each country. This approach helps to group countries according to their similarities across multiple dimensions such as: - Human Development Index (HDI) - Access to improved water - Urbanization rate - Population growth - Water stress - Integrated Water Resources Management (IWRM)

By removing atypical countries (Cape Verde, Niger), we reduce distortions and obtain more stable, homogeneous groupings.

🔹 Cluster 1: Countries with High Vulnerability

Countries: Burkina Faso, Mali, Bénin, Togo, Guinea, Sierra Leone, Guinea-Bissau

Main characteristics: - Low HDI - Low urbanization rate - High percentage of the population without improved water sources - High mortality related to unsafe water - Limited water infrastructure and governance

Interpretation:
These countries are facing critical structural and socio-economic challenges regarding access to clean water. Their profile reflects systemic vulnerability and justifies priority interventions.

🟢 Cluster 2: Countries with Better Infrastructure and Access

Countries: Senegal, Mauritania, Gambia, Ghana, Liberia, Nigeria, Côte d’Ivoire

Main characteristics: - Higher HDI - Better water infrastructure - Higher urbanization rate - Lower mortality rates related to unsafe water - Better performance in Integrated Water Resources Management (IWRM)

Interpretation:
These countries demonstrate relatively stronger capacity to provide access to drinking water. Although disparities remain, their situation is less alarming compared to the first group.

Final Remark

The hierarchical clustering allowed us to clearly differentiate countries based on structural inequalities. These two clusters can serve as a foundation for targeted water access policies, with distinct strategies: - Emergency and infrastructure investment for Cluster 1 - Improvement and sustainability policies for Cluster 2

This classification enhances the understanding of regional disparities and supports decision-makers in addressing the most urgent needs.

Régression multiple

# Charger les bibliothèques nécessaires
library(ggplot2)
library(ggpubr)

# Créer le modèle de régression linéaire
model <- lm(IDH ~ urbanization_Rate, data = RTI)

# Afficher le graphique
ggplot(RTI, aes(x = urbanization_Rate, y = IDH)) +
  geom_point() +
  geom_smooth(method = "lm", formula = y ~ x, se = TRUE, color = "blue") +
  labs(
    title = "Relation between Urbanization Rate and HDI",
    x = "Urbanization Rate",
    y = "HDI"
  ) +
  ggpubr::stat_regline_equation(
    formula = y ~ x,
    aes(label = ..eq.label..),
    label.x = -2, label.y = 2
  )
## Warning: The dot-dot notation (`..eq.label..`) was deprecated in ggplot2 3.4.0.
## ℹ Please use `after_stat(eq.label)` instead.
## This warning is displayed once every 8 hours.
## Call `lifecycle::last_lifecycle_warnings()` to see where this warning was
## generated.

Interpretation of the Urbanization–HDI Relationship and Multicollinearity Assessment

The scatterplot above visualizes the relationship between urbanization rate and Human Development Index (HDI). The blue regression line demonstrates a clear positive trend, with an estimated coefficient of +0.76, indicating that a one standard deviation increase in urbanization leads to a 0.76 standard deviation increase in HDI. This reflects the powerful role of urbanization in improving access to services, education, infrastructure, and overall well-being.

The equation:

HDI=0.76⋅Urbanization Rate

This direct effect is visually supported by the alignment of the data points along the regression line and the narrow confidence interval (shaded area), confirming the strong and consistent relationship between these two variables.

🔎 Variance Inflation Factor (VIF) Results

Predictor VIF Interpretation
Population Growth 2.43 No multicollinearity ✅
Water Stress 2.07 No multicollinearity ✅
Urbanization Rate 3.27 Acceptable range ✅
Pop. Without Improved Water 3.11 Acceptable range ✅

The VIF values are all below the critical threshold of 5, indicating that there is no significant multicollinearity between the predictors. This confirms that the regression coefficients are stable and the model is statistically reliable.

Final Note

This analysis highlights urbanization as a key driver of human development in West Africa. Its effect on HDI is both visually and statistically supported. Combined with a clean multicollinearity profile, the model offers a robust basis for policy recommendations focused on sustainable urban growth and equitable infrastructure development.

FACTOR ANALYSIS OF MIXED DATA (FAMD):

RTI <- read.csv(file = "C:\\Users\\hp14p\\Documents\\Donnée_RTI.csv", 
               header = TRUE, sep = ";", dec = ".", row.names = 1)
RTI$X <- NULL
RTI$Level.of.security <- as.factor(RTI$Level.of.security)
res <- FAMD(RTI, graph = FALSE, ncp = 5)
fviz_famd_ind(res, 
              habillage = "Level.of.security",
              repel = TRUE,
              labelsize = 5,
              pointsize = 3,          
              title = "Individus - AFDM") + 
  theme_minimal()

The Individuals - FAMD plot displays the distribution of countries based on the first two dimensions. Three categories of countries are distinguished according to their Level of Security: • Green (Secured): Countries considered safe, such as Cape Verde, Ghana, and Côte d’Ivoire, which are mainly located on the left side of the plot. • Red (Dangerous): Countries with lower security levels, such as Guinea-Bissau, Mauritania, and Guinea, positioned in the lower section of the plot. • Blue (Very Dangerous): Countries with a high level of danger, including Burkina Faso, Niger, and Mali, which appear in the upper-right section of the plot. This distribution suggests a correlation between country security levels and the factorial axes. Notably, very dangerous countries cluster in the same region, indicating that they share similar characteristics that influence their classification. # 1. ANALYSIS OF THE SCREE PLOT

fviz_screeplot(res, addlabels = TRUE, ylim = c(0, 50))

The Scree Plot above illustrates the proportion of variance explained by each dimension in the FAMD. The first dimension (Dim 1) accounts for 49.9% of the total variance, followed by the second dimension (Dim 2) with 18.6%. Together, these two dimensions capture approximately 68.5% of the information contained in the dataset. Beyond the second dimension, the proportion of explained variance decreases progressively: 10.5%, 8.1%, and 6.5% for the third, fourth, and fifth dimensions, respectively. This indicates that the first two dimensions are the most relevant for interpreting the results of the analysis. # 3.CONTRIBUTION OF COUNTRIES TO THE DIMENSIONS

fviz_contrib(res, choice = "ind", axes = 1, top = 10)

The third graph highlights the contribution of countries to the first dimension. Cape Verde plays a dominant role, contributing over 40% of the variance on this axis, followed by Niger with approximately 25%. These two countries have a significant impact on the interpretation of Dimension 1. Other countries, such as Ghana, Burkina Faso, and Mali, make moderate but noteworthy contributions. Conversely, countries like Guinea and Guinea-Bissau have a lower contribution, meaning their positions on Dimension 1 do not significantly influence the overall analysis. 4. OVERALL INTERPRETATION The FAMD effectively distinguishes groups of countries based on their mixed characteristics ( quantitative and qualitative
variables). The analysis reveals a clear separation between secured countries and those with high levels of danger. The first dimension appears to capture the major differences between these groups, while the second dimension refines this distinction. In conclusion, this analysis highlights the main disparities between countries in terms of
security, with strong influences from countries such as Cape Verde and Niger. These findings can be leveraged to better

understand the factors impacting security situations in these regions.

CONCLUSION

The study highlights significant disparities in access to drinking water in West Africa, particularly between Sahelian and coastal countries, influenced by geographical, climatic, socio-economic, and security factors. Key Findings: • Geographical Disparities: Sahelian countries (e.g., Niger, Mali, Burkina Faso) suffer from high water stress, low rainfall, and weak infrastructure, exacerbated by conflict and instability. Coastal countries (e.g., Ghana, Côte d’Ivoire) have more water resources but struggle with urban water management and rural-urban inequalities. • Socio-Economic Factors: A low Human Development Index (HDI) is linked to poor access to clean water and higher mortality from unsafe water. Rapid population growth and poverty further strain water resources, particularly in rural areas. • Urbanization Impact: While urbanization increases water stress, it also improves infrastructure and access to clean water in cities. • Security and Stability: Conflict-affected Sahelian regions experience severe disruptions in water
• access due to damaged infrastructure and forced displacement.

Recommendations:

🔹 Invest in climate-resilient water infrastructure, such as boreholes and groundwater management in Sahelian areas. 🔹 Strengthen development policies to improve HDI through education, healthcare, and income growth. 🔹 Adapt water management strategies to climate change, promoting rainwater harvesting and flood protection. 🔹 Enhance regional cooperation for transboundary water management and knowledge sharing. Ensuring equitable access to drinking water in West Africa requires a comprehensive
approach that integrates technological innovation, political stability, and socio-economic inclusion. Sustainable solutions must prioritize resilience, governance, and community engagement to achieve long-term water security.

QUESTIONNAIRE

You can access the questionnaires through the following link:

https://kf.kobotoolbox.org/#/forms/aBYYrj94KoUrTAifS7SGTd

REFERENCE :

[1] H. Ritchie, V. Samborska, et M. Roser, « Urbanization », Our World in Data, févr. 2024, Consulté le: 26 mars 2025. [En ligne]. Disponible sur: https://ourworldindata.org/urbanization

[2] « People using safely managed drinking water services, rural », World Bank Open Data. Consulté le: 21 mars 2025. [En ligne]. Disponible sur: https://data.worldbank.org

[3] Global, « ACLED Conflict Index: Global conflicts double over the past five years », ACLED. Consulté le: 16 mars 2025. [En ligne]. Disponible sur: https://acleddata.com/conflict-index/

[4] H. Ritchie et M. Roser, « Water Use and Stress », Our World in Data, juill. 2018, Consulté le: 21 mars 2025. [En ligne]. Disponible sur: https://ourworldindata.org/water-use-stress

[5] « Human Development Index », Our World in Data. Consulté le: 16 mars 2025. [En ligne]. Disponible sur: https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/human-development-index

[6] H. Ritchie et al., « Population Growth », Our World in Data, juill. 2023, Consulté le: 21 mars 2025. [En ligne]. Disponible sur: https://ourworldindata.org/population-growth

[7] H. Ritchie, V. Samborska, et M. Roser, « Urbanization », Our World in Data, févr. 2024, Consulté le: 21 mars 2025. [En ligne]. Disponible sur: https://ourworldindata.org/urbanization

[8] H. Ritchie et M. Roser, « Water Use and Stress », Our World in Data, juill. 2018, Consulté le: 28 mars 2025. [En ligne]. Disponible sur: https://ourworldindata.org/water-use-stress

[9] U. Nations, « Human Development Report 2023-24 », United Nations, mars 2024. Consulté le: 28 mars 2025. [En ligne]. Disponible sur: https://hdr.undp.org/content/human-development-report-2023-24

[10] H. Ritchie, V. Samborska, et M. Roser, « Urbanization », Our World in Data, févr. 2024, Consulté le: 28 mars 2025. [En ligne]. Disponible sur: https://ourworldindata.org/urbanization

[11] « State of the World’s Drinking Water | UNICEF ». Consulté le: 28 mars 2025. [En ligne]. Disponible sur: https://www.unicef.org/reports/state-worlds-drinking-water

[12] H. Ritchie et al., « Population Growth », Our World in Data, juill. 2023, Consulté le: 28 mars 2025. [En ligne]. Disponible sur: https://ourworldindata.org/population-growth

[13] « Water, sanitation and hygiene ». Consulté le: 28 mars 2025. [En ligne]. Disponible sur: https://www.who.int/data/gho/data/themes/water-sanitation-and-hygiene

[14] « Mali: Over 20,000 people received aid in the first half of 2018 | International Committee of the Red Cross ». Consulté le: 28 mars 2025. [En ligne]. Disponible sur: https://www.icrc.org/en/document/mali-over-20000-people-received-aid-first-half-2018

[15] U. N. Environment, « What is Integrated Water Resources Management? | UNEP - UN Environment Programme ». Consulté le: 9 avril 2025. [En ligne]. Disponible sur: https://www.unep.org/explore-topics/disasters-conflicts/where-we-work/sudan/what-integrated-water-resources-management

[16] « Programme de gestion intégrée des ressources en eau pour les bassins ouest-africains », Antea Group. Consulté le: 9 avril 2025. [En ligne]. Disponible sur: https://www.anteagroup.fr/nos-projets/international-developpement-atlas-eau-massif-montagneux-fouta-djalon?utm_source=chatgpt.com

[17] WATHI, « Gestion Intégrée des Ressources en Eau (GIRE): Qu’est-ce que c’est, et qu’est ce que cela signifie pour les Activités de Résilience et de Sécurité Alimentaire ?, PRO-WASH, 2021 », WATHI. Consulté le: 9 avril 2025. [En ligne]. Disponible sur: https://www.wathi.org/gestion-integree-des-ressources-en-eau-gire-quest-ce-que-cest-et-quest-ce-que-cela-signifie-pour-les-activites-de-resilience-et-de-securite-alimentaire-pro-wash-2021/

[18] « Climate Change and Water Security in Burkina Faso and Niger |WaterAid West Africa », RTP-RNE-WS. Consulté le: 28 mars 2025. [En ligne]. Disponible sur: https://www.fao.org/platforms/water-scarcity/Knowledge/partners-contributions/detail/climate-change-and-water-security-in-burkina-faso-and-niger-wateraid-west-africa/en

[19] UNCHR, « Climate Risk Profile: Sahel ». [En ligne]. Disponible sur: https://www.unhcr.org/sites/default/files/legacy-pdf/61a49df44.pdf