R Markdown

## spc_tbl_ [14,999 × 10] (S3: spec_tbl_df/tbl_df/tbl/data.frame)
##  $ satisfaction_level   : num [1:14999] 0.38 0.8 0.11 0.72 0.37 0.41 0.1 0.92 0.89 0.42 ...
##  $ last_evaluation      : num [1:14999] 0.53 0.86 0.88 0.87 0.52 0.5 0.77 0.85 1 0.53 ...
##  $ number_project       : num [1:14999] 2 5 7 5 2 2 6 5 5 2 ...
##  $ average_montly_hours : num [1:14999] 157 262 272 223 159 153 247 259 224 142 ...
##  $ time_spend_company   : num [1:14999] 3 6 4 5 3 3 4 5 5 3 ...
##  $ Work_accident        : num [1:14999] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ...
##  $ left                 : num [1:14999] 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ...
##  $ promotion_last_5years: num [1:14999] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ...
##  $ Department           : chr [1:14999] "sales" "sales" "sales" "sales" ...
##  $ salary               : chr [1:14999] "low" "medium" "medium" "low" ...
##  - attr(*, "spec")=
##   .. cols(
##   ..   satisfaction_level = col_double(),
##   ..   last_evaluation = col_double(),
##   ..   number_project = col_double(),
##   ..   average_montly_hours = col_double(),
##   ..   time_spend_company = col_double(),
##   ..   Work_accident = col_double(),
##   ..   left = col_double(),
##   ..   promotion_last_5years = col_double(),
##   ..   Department = col_character(),
##   ..   salary = col_character()
##   .. )
##  - attr(*, "problems")=<externalptr>

1. T-Test 1: Satisfaction Level vs. Attrition

## 
##  Welch Two Sample t-test
## 
## data:  hr$satisfaction_level by hr$left
## t = 46.636, df = 5167, p-value < 2.2e-16
## alternative hypothesis: true difference in means between group 0 and group 1 is not equal to 0
## 95 percent confidence interval:
##  0.2171815 0.2362417
## sample estimates:
## mean in group 0 mean in group 1 
##       0.6668096       0.4400980

p-value interpretation: The p-value is very small, therefore the difference between means of satisfaction level by employee attrition is significant.

t-test interpretation: The difference in mean satisfaction level between employees who left and those who stayed is significant, where employees with lower satisfaction levels had higher attrition rates.

non-technical interpretation: Employees who were less satisfied had a higher attrition rate.

2. T-Test 2: Last Evaluation vs. Attrition

## 
##  Welch Two Sample t-test
## 
## data:  hr$last_evaluation by hr$left
## t = -0.72534, df = 5154.9, p-value = 0.4683
## alternative hypothesis: true difference in means between group 0 and group 1 is not equal to 0
## 95 percent confidence interval:
##  -0.009772224  0.004493874
## sample estimates:
## mean in group 0 mean in group 1 
##       0.7154734       0.7181126

p-value interpretation: The p-value is greater than 0.1, therefore the difference between means of last evaluation by employee attrition is not significant.

non-technical interpretation: Performance evaluations did not have a clear effect on employee attrition rate.

3. T-Test 3: Average Monthly Hours vs. Attrition

## 
##  Welch Two Sample t-test
## 
## data:  hr$average_montly_hours by hr$left
## t = -7.5323, df = 4875.1, p-value = 5.907e-14
## alternative hypothesis: true difference in means between group 0 and group 1 is not equal to 0
## 95 percent confidence interval:
##  -10.534631  -6.183384
## sample estimates:
## mean in group 0 mean in group 1 
##        199.0602        207.4192

p-value interpretation: The p-value is less than 0.1, therefore the difference between means of average monthly hours by employee attrition is significant.

t-test interpretation: The difference in mean monthly hours between employees who left and those who stayed is significant, where working more hours is associated with a higher attrition rate.

non-technical interpretation: Employees who worked more hours per month had a higher attrition rate.

4. T-Test 4: Time Spent at Company vs. Attrition

## 
##  Welch Two Sample t-test
## 
## data:  hr$time_spend_company by hr$left
## t = -22.631, df = 9625.6, p-value < 2.2e-16
## alternative hypothesis: true difference in means between group 0 and group 1 is not equal to 0
## 95 percent confidence interval:
##  -0.5394767 -0.4534706
## sample estimates:
## mean in group 0 mean in group 1 
##        3.380032        3.876505

p-value interpretation: The p-value is less than 0.1, therefore the difference between means of time spent at company by employee attrition is significant.

t-test interpretation: The difference in mean tenure between employees who left and those who stayed is significant, where longer time at the company is associated with a higher attrition rate.

non-technical interpretation: Employees who had been at the company longer had a higher attrition rate.