Consider our respiratory disturbance index example again.

A reasonable strategy would reject the null hypothesis \(\bar{X}\) was larger than some constant, \(C\).

\(C\) will take into account the variability of \(\bar{X}\).

Typically, \(C\) is chosen so that the probability of a Type I error, \(\alpha\), is \(.05\) (or some other relevant constant), this probability label is a low number. \(5\%\) has emerged as sort of a benchmark in hypothesis testing.

\(\alpha\) = Type I error rate = Probability of rejecting the null hypothesis when, in fact, the null hypothesis is correct.

That’s a bad thing, you don’t want to make these kind of mistakes. But as in our court of law example, you don’t want to set this rate too low, because then we would never reject a null hypothesis. Let’s see if we can choose this constant \(C\), so that probability we would reject is simply tolerably low, say \(5\%\).

Example continued

Standard error of the mean \(10/\sqrt{100} = 1\), the assumed standard deviation of the population. Here we haven’t drawn a distinction as to whether we estimate, or this is just a number that I’ve given you. Divided by \(\sqrt{100}\), that’s the square root of the sample size, that works out to be 1. Here I just created the settings, so it completely worked out to be 1.

Discussion

\[ \frac{32 - 32}{10/\sqrt{100}} = 2 \]

is greater than \(1.645\)