1 Loading Libraries

# install any packages you have not previously used, then comment them back out.

#install.packages("car")
#install.packages("effsize")

library(psych) # for the describe() command
library(car) # for the leveneTest() command

## Loading required package: carData

## 
## Attaching package: 'car'

## The following object is masked from 'package:psych':
## 
##     logit

library(effsize) # for the cohen.d() command

## 
## Attaching package: 'effsize'

## The following object is masked from 'package:psych':
## 
##     cohen.d

2 Importing Data

d <- read.csv(file="data/projectdata.csv", header=T)

# For the HW, you will import the project dataset you cleaned previously
# This will be the dataset you'll use for HWs throughout the rest of the semester

3 State Your Hypothesis

There will be a significant difference in social media use by gender.

Note: Conscientiousness was measured using the International Personality Item Pool (IPIP) in this dataset.

[Remember to revise the above hypothesis in you HW assignment.]

4 Check Your Variables

# you **only** need to check the variables you're using in the current analysis

## Checking the Categorical variable (IV)

str(d)

## 'data.frame':    854 obs. of  7 variables:
##  $ ResponseID  : chr  "R_12G7bIqN2wB2N65" "R_3lLnoV2mYVYHFvf" "R_1gTNDGWsqikPuEX" "R_3G1XvswZmPZTkMU" ...
##  $ gender      : chr  "m" "f" "f" "f" ...
##  $ disability  : chr  "psychiatric" "other" "learning" "psychiatric" ...
##  $ mindful     : num  2.2 1.6 1.8 4.27 3.4 ...
##  $ socmeduse   : int  34 37 26 23 35 30 40 34 38 42 ...
##  $ efficacy    : num  2.2 3.1 2.9 3.1 2.8 2.9 3.3 1.9 2.7 3 ...
##  $ moa_maturity: num  3.67 2 4 3.67 3.67 ...

# if the categorical variable you're using is showing as a "chr" (character), you must change it to be a ** factor ** -- using the next line of code (as.factor)

d$gender <- as.factor(d$gender)

str(d)

## 'data.frame':    854 obs. of  7 variables:
##  $ ResponseID  : chr  "R_12G7bIqN2wB2N65" "R_3lLnoV2mYVYHFvf" "R_1gTNDGWsqikPuEX" "R_3G1XvswZmPZTkMU" ...
##  $ gender      : Factor w/ 3 levels "f","m","nb": 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ...
##  $ disability  : chr  "psychiatric" "other" "learning" "psychiatric" ...
##  $ mindful     : num  2.2 1.6 1.8 4.27 3.4 ...
##  $ socmeduse   : int  34 37 26 23 35 30 40 34 38 42 ...
##  $ efficacy    : num  2.2 3.1 2.9 3.1 2.8 2.9 3.3 1.9 2.7 3 ...
##  $ moa_maturity: num  3.67 2 4 3.67 3.67 ...

table(d$gender, useNA = "always")

## 
##    f    m   nb <NA> 
##  637  181   36    0

## Checking the Continuous variable (DV)

# you can use the describe() command on an entire dataframe (d) or just on a single variable within your dataframe -- which we will do here

describe(d$socmeduse)

##    vars   n  mean   sd median trimmed  mad min max range skew kurtosis  se
## X1    1 854 34.17 8.62     35   34.43 7.41  11  55    44 -0.3      0.2 0.3

# also use a histogram to visualize your continuous variable

hist(d$socmeduse)

# use the describeBy() command to view the means and standard deviations by group
# it's very similar to the describe() command but splits the dataframe according to the 'group' variable

describeBy(d$socmeduse, group=d$gender)

## 
##  Descriptive statistics by group 
## group: f
##    vars   n  mean  sd median trimmed  mad min max range skew kurtosis   se
## X1    1 637 34.73 8.4     35   34.96 7.41  11  55    44 -0.3     0.25 0.33
## ------------------------------------------------------------ 
## group: m
##    vars   n  mean   sd median trimmed mad min max range  skew kurtosis   se
## X1    1 181 32.02 8.91     33   32.24 8.9  11  55    44 -0.23     0.04 0.66
## ------------------------------------------------------------ 
## group: nb
##    vars  n  mean   sd median trimmed mad min max range  skew kurtosis   se
## X1    1 36 35.06 9.52     36    35.5 8.9  11  54    43 -0.47    -0.02 1.59

# lastly, use a boxplot to examine your chosen continuous and categorical variables together

boxplot(d$socmeduse~d$gender)

5 Check Your Assumptions

5.1 T-test Assumptions

IV must have two levels
Data values must be independent (independent t-test only)
Data obtained via a random sample
Dependent variable must be normally distributed
Variances of the two groups are approximately equal

# If the IV has more than 2 levels, you must DROP any additional levels in order to meet the first assumption of a t-test.

## NOTE: This is a FOUR STEP process!

 d<- subset(d, gender != "nb") # use subset() to remove all participants from the additional level

table(d$gender, useNA = "always") # verify that now there are ZERO participants in the additional level d$gender<- droplevels(d$gender) # use droplevels() to drop the empty factor

## 
##    f    m   nb <NA> 
##  637  181    0    0

d$gender<- droplevels(d$gender) # use droplevels() to drop the empty factor

table(d$gender, useNA = "always") # verify that now the entire factor level is removed

## 
##    f    m <NA> 
##  637  181    0

## Repeat ALL THE STEPS ABOVE if your IV has more levels that need to be DROPPED. Copy the 4 lines of code, and replace the level name in the subset() command.

5.2 Testing Homogeneity of Variance with Levene’s Test

We can test whether the variances of our two groups are equal using Levene’s test. The NULL hypothesis is that the variance between the two groups is equal, which is the result we WANT. So when running Levene’s test we’re hoping for a NON-SIGNIFICANT result!

# use the leveneTest() command from the car package to test homogeneity of variance
# it uses the same 'formula' setup that we'll use for our t-test: formula is y~x, where y is our DV and x is our IV

leveneTest(socmeduse~gender, data = d)

## Levene's Test for Homogeneity of Variance (center = median)
##        Df F value Pr(>F)
## group   1  0.7874 0.3752
##       816

Levene’s test revealed that our data does not have significantly different variances between the two comparison groups, men and women, on their levels of social media use.

[Revise the above statement for you HW assignment.]

When running a t-test, we can account for heterogeneity in our variance by using the Welch’s t-test, which does not have the same assumption about variance as the Student’s t-test (the general default type of t-test in statistics). R defaults to using Welch’s t-test so this doesn’t require any changes on our part! Even if your data has no issues with homogeneity of variance, you’ll still use Welch’s t-test – it handles the potential issues around variance well and there are no real downsides. We’re using Levene’s test here to get into the habit of checking the homogeneity of our variance, even if we already have the solution for any potential problems.

5.3 Issues with My Data

My independent variable has more than two levels. To proceed with this analysis, I will drop the non-binary participants from my sample. I will make a note to discuss this issue in my methods section write-up and in my discussion section as a limitation of my study.

My data does not have an issue regarding homogeneity of variance, as Levene’s test was signigigant. To accommodate for this heterogeneity of variance, I will use Welchs’s t-test instead of Levene’s t-test in my analysis.

[Revise the above statements for you HW assignment.]

6 Run a T-test

# Very simple! we use the same formula of y~x, where y is our DV and x is our IV

t_output <- t.test(d$socmeduse~d$gender)  # t_output will now show in your Global Environment

7 View Test Output

t_output

## 
##  Welch Two Sample t-test
## 
## data:  d$socmeduse by d$gender
## t = 3.6567, df = 277.46, p-value = 0.0003056
## alternative hypothesis: true difference in means between group f and group m is not equal to 0
## 95 percent confidence interval:
##  1.251226 4.169314
## sample estimates:
## mean in group f mean in group m 
##        34.72684        32.01657

8 Calculate Cohen’s d - Effect Size

# once again, we use the same formula, y~x, to calculate cohen's d

# We **only** calculate effect size if the test is SIG!

d_output <- cohen.d(d$socmeduse~d$gender)  # d_output will now show in your Global Environment

9 View Effect Size

d_output

## 
## Cohen's d
## 
## d estimate: 0.3182367 (small)
## 95 percent confidence interval:
##     lower     upper 
## 0.1521837 0.4842897

## Remember to always take the ABSOLAUTE VALUE of the effect size value (i.e., it will never be negative)

10 Write Up Results

To test our hypothesis that women in our sample would report significantly higher levels of soical media use than men, we used an independent sample t-test. This required us to drop our non-binary gender participants from our sample, as we are limited to a two group comparison when using this test. We tested the homogeneity of variance with levene’s test and did not find signs of heterogeneity of variance (p <0.05). This suggests that there is not an increased chance of type 1 error. Our data met all other assumptions of an independent samples t-test.

As predicted, we found that women (M = 34.73, SD = 8.4) reported significantly higher levels of social media use than men (M = 32.02, SD = 8.91); t(3.6567) = 0.0003056, p < .001 (see Figure 1). The effect size was calculated using Cohen’s d, with a value of 0.3182367 (small effect; Cohen, 1988).