Use GRETL to verify two pre-calculated regressions:
A. Initial Data Inspection
- Compare distributions:
- Raw wage (right-skewed) vs. log(wage) (normalized)
- Why log? “Economic effects are multiplicative”
B. Visualizing the Gap
- Create side-by-side boxplots (Male vs. Female wages)
- Guide students to observe:
- Median difference
- Spread/variability
- Outliers
C. First Regression
- Run: log(wage) = 4.73 - 0.25Female
- Calculate: e^(-0.25) ≈ 0.78 → 22% wage gap
- Critical Discussion:
“Is this entire gap due to discrimination? What might be
missing?”
D. Identifying Key Confounders
1. Education Levels
- Cross-tabulation shows:
- 48% women vs. 34% men in lowest education tier
- “Higher education → higher wages”
A. Total vs. Partial Effects
- Total Effect (Simple Regression):
- “What’s the overall gap society observes?”
- Policy use: Assessing broad inequality
B. Omitted Variable Bias
1. Visualization:
Gender → Wage ↘ ↙ Education Part-Time
GRETL Steps:
1. Save residuals from initial wage regression
2. Check:
- Residuals vs. Education (expect positive correlation)
- Residuals vs. Part-Time (expect negative correlation)
Teaching Insight:
“If residuals correlate with other variables, our model is
incomplete!”
Concept | Simple Regression | Multiple Regression |
---|---|---|
What It Measures | Total wage gap | Direct gender effect |
Key Limitation | Omitted variables | Needs more data |