This analysis is based on an exercise in ESRI’s MOOC program “Going Places with Spatial Analysis”. While the exercise is designed to be completed in arcgis online, a subscription is required hence my goal here is to replicate the analysis using simple Quarto dashboards in R. This is the first in a series of exercises I shall replicate.
A local development company is looking for optimal sites to build small mixed-use developments, in a city with a large amount of land already zoned for mixed-use development. The target demographic are people in their 20s and 30s for both the retail and rental units. They believe areas with larger rental markets offer more potential for clients who would be interested in the new rental units that would be available. To create innovative mixed-use developments with diversity and equity in mind, the goal is to select sites that comply with the affordable housing and equitable transportation policies.
Should the development company build a small mixed-use development in the municipality of Grisham? To answer this question, we need to know:
The Grisham city boundary, zoning and public transport Layers are obtained from the ArcGIS Living Atlas of the World using their service links. Zoning data contains features on municipalities east of Portland while transportation data provided by TriMet contains bus, light rail and commuter rail service in the Portland, Oregon region. It includes the Metropolitan Area Express Light Rail which connects Portland City Center with Beaverton, Clackamas, Gresham, Hillsboro, Milwaukie, North/Northeast Portland and Portland International Airport. The Grisham housing blocks layer is enriched with the home occupancy (number of owner and rental units) and the median income per block, and the resulting shapefile is downloaded. These layers are owned by EsriTrainingSvc. We analyse these layers to answer the questions above.
All data layers are matched to the projection of the zoning data (EPSG: 4326) and the variables required to answer the development company’s questions: CITY, ZONING DESCRIPTION, ZONING, ACRES, AGE_22_39 (AGE_22_29 + AGE_30_39), RENTAL UNITS, MEDIAN INCOME, LIGHT RAIL and ABOVE AVG RENTAL AREAS (i.e RENTAL UNITS > mean(RENTAL UNITS)) are selected.
| layers | links |
|---|---|
| grisham_city_boundary_data | https://services.arcgis.com/ue9rwulIoeLEI9bj/arcgis/rest/services/city_boundary1/FeatureServer/0 |
| grisham_zoning_data | https://services.arcgis.com/ue9rwulIoeLEI9bj/arcgis/rest/services/Gresham_Zoning/FeatureServer/0 |
| grisham_block_group_data | /Users/hitimana/Desktop/kwize/Kwiz Computing Technologies - Rebirth/GIS/esri/Going Places with Spatial Analysis - MOOC/2. Exercise 1- Understand and compare places- Mixed-use development/data/Block_Group_Enriched_with_Owner_and_Rental_Units_and_Median_Income/EnrichedLayer.shp |
| grisham_public_transport_data | https://services.arcgis.com/ue9rwulIoeLEI9bj/arcgis/rest/services/MAX_Light_Rail/FeatureServer/0 |
Grisham City is grouped into 15 zones, each with one or more sub-classes (ZONING DESCRIPTION) as shown in Table 1 above.
| ZONING | ZONING DESCRIPTION | Freq |
|---|---|---|
| 8 | ||
| CC | Permits moderately scaled commercial; mixed-use; and residential uses. | 2 |
| CG | General Commercial | 24 |
| CG | Extensive Commercial | 5 |
| CG | Exclusive Extensive Commercial | 6 |
| CG | Urban General Commercial District | 1 |
| CG | Permits commercial; mixed-use; and residential uses. | 2 |
| CN | Neighborhood Commercial | 10 |
| CN | Urban Local Commercial District | 1 |
| CO | Transit Development - High density Civic | 1 |
| CO | Transit Development - Medium density Civic | 2 |
| CO | Transit Development | 2 |
| IH | Heavy Industrial | 5 |
| IL | Light Industrial | 12 |
| IMU | Business Park (Mix of commercial and light industrial uses) | 5 |
| MFR1 | Medium Density Residential - Civic (min 17 units/acre) | 1 |
| MFR1 | Moderate Density Multi-Family Housing (12.1 to 24.2 units/acre) | 50 |
| MFR1 | Moderate Density Multi-Family Housing (8.71 to 12.1 units/acre) | 20 |
| MFR1 | Downtown Low-Density Residential. | 1 |
| MFR2 | High Density Residential - Civic (min 24 units/acre) | 1 |
| MFR2 | High Density Residential (Apartment Density of 20.26-60.08 units/acre) | 10 |
| MUC1 | Office/Residential (Mix of office and moderate density residential) | 13 |
| MUC1 | Central Urban Core - commercial/mixed use at about 17 units/acre. | 1 |
| MUC2 | Downtown Moderate-Density Residential; densities from 17-30 units/acre. | 3 |
| MUC2 | Downtown Transit - commercial; mixed use; and residential uses. | 1 |
| RRFU | Urban Future District (minimum lot size = 20 ac.) | 2 |
| SFR2 | Single family residential | 18 |
| SFR3 | Single family residential | 18 |
There are 18 mixed use zones (ZONING: “MUC1” or “MUC2”) totaling 517.38 Acres. Figure 1 maps layers for the city’s zoning categories and the areas zoned for mixed use development. From the summary table (Table 2), most of these blocks zoned for mixed use developments are small in size (Median Acreage < Mean Acreage) with larger mixed use lots near the city center and smaller lots towards the North-West.
Figure 1: Map of All Zoning Categories and Mixed use Zones in Grisham City| vars | n | mean | sd | median | trimmed | mad | min | max | range | skew | kurtosis | se | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACRES | 1 | 18 | 28.7433 | 45.6577 | 8.765 | 23.5787 | 7.9616 | 1.03 | 139.09 | 138.06 | 1.5999 | 0.7729 | 10.7616 |
The development company is interested in areas with a high number of renters/rental units, targeting renters aged between 22-39 years. The Grisham High Rent Areas layer in Figure 3 differentiates between the high rent (rental units > average) and low rent neighborhoods in Grisham, quantifying the existing rental units and the target population while the Where 22-39 year olds live in High Rent Areas of Grisham City layer identifies the percentage of the proportion of the target population within the high rental markets.
Figure 3: Map of population between 22-39 years in High Rent Areas in Grisham CityTo comply with the affordable housing and equitable transportation policies, we ovelay a map of median household incomes < $50,000 (Affordable Housing Neighbourhoods layer) and a buffer of 0.25 miles around the MAX Blue Line light rail system (Proximity (0.25 Mile buffer) to the Blue rail Light Rail System layer) to identify locations that satisfy the 2 policies (Figure 4).
Figure 4: Map of Median Income < $50,000 in Grisham City along 0.25 miles of the Blue Line Light Rail SystemSelect your features of interest to visualize their interactions