library(psych) # for the describe() command
library(car) # for the leveneTest() command
library(effsize) # for the cohen.d() commandt-Test HW
Loading Libraries
Importing Data
# UPDATE THIS FOR HOMEWORK!!!!!
d <- read.csv(file="Data/mydata.csv", header=T)State Your Hypothesis - PART OF YOUR WRITEUP
Men and women will report different levels of social media use.
State your t-test hypothesis. Remember, a t-test has one continuous variable as the dependent variable, and one categorical variable with two levels as the independent variable. If your IV of choice has more than two levels, you will need to pick two levels to compare and drop the rest, or combine levels until you only have two left.
Check Your Assumptions
T-test Assumptions
- Data values must be independent (independent t-test only) (confirmed by data report)
- Data obtained via a random sample (confirmed by data report)
- IV must have two levels (will check below)
- Dependent variable must be normally distributed (will check below. if issues, note and proceed)
- Variances of the two groups must be approximately equal, aka ‘homogeneity of variance’. Lacking this makes our results inaccurate (will check below - this really only applies to Student’s t-test, but we’ll check it anyway)
Checking IV levels
# preview the levels and counts for your IV
table(d$gender, useNA = "always")
f m nb <NA>
2307 786 53 0 #
# # note that the table() output shows you exactly how the levels of your variable are written. when recoding, make sure you are spelling them exactly as they appear
#
# # to drop levels from your variable
# # this subsets the data and says that any participant who is coded as 'LEVEL BAD' should be removed
# # if you don't need this for the homework, comment it out (add a # at the beginning of the line)
d <- subset(d, gender != "nb")
# table(d$mhealth, useNA = "always")
# # to combine levels
# # this says that where any participant is coded as 'LEVEL BAD' it should be replaced by 'LEVEL GOOD'
# # you can repeat this as needed, changing 'LEVEL BAD' if you have multiple levels that you want to combine into a single level
# # if you don't need this for the homework, comment it out (add a # at the beginning of the line)
#d$mhealth_rc[d$mhealth == "anxiety disorder"] <- "mental health diagnosis"
#d$mhealth_rc[d$mhealth == "bipolar"] <- "mental health diagnosis"
#d$mhealth_rc[d$mhealth == "depression"] <- "mental health diagnosis"
#d$mhealth_rc[d$mhealth == "eating disorders"] <- "mental health diagnosis"
#d$mhealth_rc[d$mhealth == "obsessive compulsive disorder"] <- "mental health diagnosis"
#d$mhealth_rc[d$mhealth == "other"] <- "mental health diagnosis"
#d$mhealth_rc[d$mhealth == "ptsd"] <- "mental health diagnosis"
#d$mhealth_rc[d$mhealth == "none or NA"] <- "no mental health diagnosis"
#table(d$mhealth_rc, useNA = "always")
#table(d$mhealth, d$mhealth_rc, useNA = "always")
# # preview your changes and make sure everything is correct
table(d$gender, useNA = "always")
f m <NA>
2307 786 0 #table(d$mhealth_rc, useNA = "always")
# # check your variable types
str(d)'data.frame': 3093 obs. of 6 variables:
$ gender : chr "f" "m" "m" "f" ...
$ party_rc : chr "democrat" "independent" "apolitical" "apolitical" ...
$ socmeduse: int 47 23 34 35 37 13 37 43 37 29 ...
$ belong : num 2.8 4.2 3.6 4 3.4 4.2 3.9 3.6 2.9 2.5 ...
$ swb : num 4.33 4.17 1.83 5.17 3.67 ...
$ stress : num 3.3 3.3 4 3.2 3.1 3.5 3.3 2.4 2.9 2.7 ...# # make sure that your IV is recognized as a factor by R
d$gender <- as.factor(d$gender)
#d$mhealth_rc <- as.factor(d$mhealth_rc)Testing Homogeneity of Variance with Levene’s Test
We can test whether the variances of our two groups are equal using Levene’s test. The null hypothesis is that the variance between the two groups is equal, which is the result we want. So when running Levene’s test we’re hoping for a non-significant result!
# levene test is not significant which is a good thing
# # use the leveneTest() command from the car package to test homogeneity of variance
# # uses the same 'formula' setup that we'll use for our t-test: formula is y~x, where y is our DV and x is our IV
leveneTest(socmeduse~gender, data = d)Levene's Test for Homogeneity of Variance (center = median)
Df F value Pr(>F)
group 1 13.922 0.0001939 ***
3091
---
Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1This is more of a formality in our case, because we are using Welch’s t-test, which does not have the same assumptions as Student’s t-test (the default type of t-test) about variance. R defaults to using Welch’s t-test so this doesn’t require any extra effort on our part!
Check Normality
# you only need to check the variables you're using in the current analysis
# although you checked them previously, it's always a good idea to look them over again and be sure that everything is correct
# you can use the describe() command on an entire datafrom (d) or just on a single variable (d$pss)
# use it to check the skew and kurtosis of your DV
describe(d$socmeduse) vars n mean sd median trimmed mad min max range skew kurtosis se
X1 1 3093 34.45 8.58 35 34.72 7.41 11 55 44 -0.31 0.25 0.15# can use the describeBy() command to view the means and standard deviations by group
# it's very similar to the describe() command but splits the dataframe according to the 'group' variable
describeBy(d$socmeduse, group=d$gender)
Descriptive statistics by group
group: f
vars n mean sd median trimmed mad min max range skew kurtosis se
X1 1 2307 35.15 8.23 35 35.36 7.41 11 55 44 -0.28 0.34 0.17
------------------------------------------------------------
group: m
vars n mean sd median trimmed mad min max range skew kurtosis se
X1 1 786 32.38 9.21 33 32.68 8.9 11 55 44 -0.25 -0.07 0.33# also use a histogram to examine your continuous variable
hist(d$socmeduse)
# last, use a boxplot to examine your continuous and categorical variables together
# categorical/IV goes on the right, continuous/DV goes on the left
boxplot(d$socmeduse~d$gender)
Issues with My Data - PART OF YOUR WRITEUP
“We dropped participants who identified as a gender other than male or female (non-binary). Before proceeding with analysis, we confirmed that all t-test assumptions were met. Levene’s test found significant heterogeneity of variance (p < .001). As a result, Welch’s t-test will be used. We also confirmed that our dependent variable is normally distributed (skew and kurtosis between -2 and +2).”
Run a T-test
# # very simple! we specify the dataframe alongside the variables instead of having a separate argument for the dataframe like we did for leveneTest()
t_output <- t.test(d$socmeduse~d$gender)View Test Output
t_output
Welch Two Sample t-test
data: d$socmeduse by d$gender
t = 7.4837, df = 1239.4, p-value = 1.365e-13
alternative hypothesis: true difference in means between group f and group m is not equal to 0
95 percent confidence interval:
2.046077 3.500001
sample estimates:
mean in group f mean in group m
35.15345 32.38041 Calculate Cohen’s d
# # once again, we use our formula to calculate cohen's d
d_output <- cohen.d(d$socmeduse~d$gender)View Effect Size
- Trivial: < .2
- Small: between .2 and .5
- Medium: between .5 and .8
- Large: > .8
d_output
Cohen's d
d estimate: 0.3265469 (small)
95 percent confidence interval:
lower upper
0.2451597 0.4079342 Write Up Results
We tested our hypothesis that there would be a difference in social media use between men and women using an independent samples t-test. We dropped participants who identified as a gender other than male or female (non-binary). Before proceeding with analysis, we confirmed that all t-test assumptions were met. Levene’s test found significant heterogeneity of variance (p < .001). As a result, Welch’s t-test was used. The results were t (1239.4) = 7.48, p < .001, d = 0.33, 95% [0.25, .41] (refer to Figure 1). Our effect size was small according to Cohen (1988).”
References
Cohen J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. New York, NY: Routledge Academic.