Effect of Food Distribution on Body Condition
Contrasts between aggregated, even, and control distributions
model	GROUP	REPRODUCTIVE	CONTRAST	ESTIMATE	STD. ERROR	T-RATIO	P-VALUE1
Food Distribution	female	FALSE	aggregated - control	-0.43	0.58	-0.74	0.931
Food Distribution	female	FALSE	aggregated - even	-0.52	0.51	-1.02	0.931
Food Distribution	female	FALSE	control - even	-0.09	0.63	-0.15	0.931
Food Distribution	female	TRUE	aggregated - control	0.69	0.63	1.10	0.82
Food Distribution	female	TRUE	aggregated - even	0.15	0.51	0.30	0.837
Food Distribution	female	TRUE	control - even	-0.54	0.66	-0.81	0.837
Food Distribution	male non repro	FALSE	aggregated - control	0.25	0.48	0.52	1
Food Distribution	male non repro	FALSE	aggregated - even	-0.29	0.43	-0.67	1
Food Distribution	male non repro	FALSE	control - even	-0.54	0.52	-1.03	0.913
Food Distribution	male non repro	TRUE	aggregated - control	0.25	0.48	0.52	1
Food Distribution	male non repro	TRUE	aggregated - even	-0.29	0.43	-0.67	1
Food Distribution	male non repro	TRUE	control - even	-0.54	0.52	-1.03	0.913
Food Distribution	male repro	FALSE	aggregated - control	-0.43	0.58	-0.74	0.931
Food Distribution	male repro	FALSE	aggregated - even	-0.52	0.51	-1.02	0.931
Food Distribution	male repro	FALSE	control - even	-0.09	0.63	-0.15	0.931
Food Distribution	male repro	TRUE	aggregated - control	0.46	0.54	0.86	1
Food Distribution	male repro	TRUE	aggregated - even	0.16	0.53	0.31	1
Food Distribution	male repro	TRUE	control - even	-0.30	0.59	-0.50	1
1 * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001