class: center, middle, inverse, title-slide .title[ # The State of Energy and Climate Policy ] .subtitle[ ## Energy and Climate Policy and Politics in US State Legislatures, 2011 to 2024 ] .author[ ### Boris Shor and Jennifer Clark ] .institute[ ### Department of Political Science and Hobby School of Public Affairs, University of Houston ] .date[ ### Februrary 3, 2025 ] --- <style type="text/css"> .regression table { font-size: 12px; } </style> # Recent Policies in California .pull-left[ - **2023** - SB 704: Harder to build oil and gas developments off coast - AB 1389: Targets for electric vehicle charging stations - SB 619: Speed up permitting for electric lines - **2022** - AB 1279: Carbon neutrality by 2045 - AB 1020: Target 90% of electricity from clean sources by 2035 and 95% by 2040 ] .pull-right[ <img src="data:image/png;base64,#Graphics/newsom.jpg" width="90%" style="display: block; margin: auto;" /> ] --- # Colorado enacts SB 1281 (2023) .pull-left[ - Provides tax credits of up to $1/kg for users of clean hydrogen — first public subsidy for low-carbon H^2 usage - Applies to "green hydrogen" but likely not "blue hydrogen" or "gray hydrogen" - Context: Colorado has a unified, progessive Democratic legislative majority ] .pull-right[ <img src="data:image/png;base64,#Graphics/polis.jpeg" width="60%" style="display: block; margin: auto;" /> ] --- # States are where the action is - Policy gridlock much more likely in Washington compared to states - Regulation of energy and environment is frequently most done at the state level - Lower level governments are at the control of states - Diffusion - Policies spread to 'similar' states - New York, Washington, and Massachusetts are going to follow California - Louisiana, Florida, Georgia are going to follow Texas - Policies spread to federal government depending on the presidential administration --- # Partisanship of Legislative Majorities, 2024 <img src="data:image/png;base64,#Graphics/legislative_control_2024.png" width="80%" style="display: block; margin: auto;" /> --- # New Big Data, but how to find climate bills? .pull-left[ - New big data set on 1.1mm bills in 50 states between 2011 and 2024 - Keyword-assisted topic modeling (Eshima, Imai, and Sasaki 2024) - 110k bills on climate, energy, environment - Machine learning topic modeling (machine learning) - Human coding - 40k bills on energy - Manually coded by Center for New Energy Economy at Colorado State ] .pull-right[ <img src="data:image/png;base64,#shor-clark-poster-2025_files/figure-html/unnamed-chunk-7-1.png" width="100%" style="display: block; margin: auto;" /> ] --- # Bill content - We find many thousands of these bills. But what's in them? - Even if we know the *policy area* we don't know in which *direction* policy is being made - Alternative strategy is to use contextual data, mostly from bill sponsors - Bill-level data - Good: Sponsor partisanship - Democratic only, Republican only, Bipartisan - Better: Sponsor ideology - median sponsor's ideal point - Shor-McCarty scores (2011, 2022) - Our measure: median bill sponsor. Positive scores more conservative, negative scores more liberal. - We divide in ideology terciles for visualizations --- # Sponsor ideology of bills that passed - Of the bills that pass, moderate and ideological bills do well, depending on the legislative context <div class="figure" style="text-align: center"> <img src="data:image/png;base64,#shor-clark-poster-2025_files/figure-html/unnamed-chunk-8-1.png" alt="Passed Bill Sponsorship Rates, By Ideology" width="80%" /> <p class="caption">Passed Bill Sponsorship Rates, By Ideology</p> </div> --- # Cumulative Outcomes - If we look at all bills cumulatively, moderate bills account for half the total <div class="figure" style="text-align: center"> <img src="data:image/png;base64,#shor-clark-poster-2025_files/figure-html/unnamed-chunk-9-1.png" alt="Bill Outcomes by Ideology" width="80%" /> <p class="caption">Bill Outcomes by Ideology</p> </div> --- # Trends - Nevertheless the trend is for the average climate and energy bill to be more liberal over time <div class="figure" style="text-align: center"> <img src="data:image/png;base64,#shor-clark-poster-2025_files/figure-html/unnamed-chunk-10-1.png" alt="Average Passed Bill Sponsor Ideology over Time" width="80%" /> <p class="caption">Average Passed Bill Sponsor Ideology over Time</p> </div> --- # Polarization of Energy Legislation - Bills passed in Democratic legislatures are polarizing most rapidly - Average bill was at most most moderate 29% of party in 2011 - Average bill was at most most moderate 42% of party in 2023 - Bills passed in Republican legislatures polarized less by comparison (but pickup 2021-) - Average bill was at most most moderate 28% of party in 2011 - Average bill was at most most moderate 33% of party in 2023 <div class="figure" style="text-align: center"> <img src="data:image/png;base64,#shor-clark-poster-2025_files/figure-html/unnamed-chunk-11-1.png" alt="Average Passed Bill Sponsor Ideology over Time by Majority Party" width="60%" /> <p class="caption">Average Passed Bill Sponsor Ideology over Time by Majority Party</p> </div> --- # Median bill sponsor by state - Average climate bill tracks state legislative ideology, but shaded to the left - Compare California and Texas <div class="figure" style="text-align: center"> <img src="data:image/png;base64,#shor-clark-poster-2025_files/figure-html/unnamed-chunk-12-1.png" alt="Median Sponsor" width="80%" /> <p class="caption">Median Sponsor</p> </div> --- # State Trends: South <div class="figure" style="text-align: center"> <img src="data:image/png;base64,#shor-clark-poster-2025_files/figure-html/unnamed-chunk-13-1.png" alt="State Bill Sponsorship Trends by State, South" width="90%" /> <p class="caption">State Bill Sponsorship Trends by State, South</p> </div> --- # State Trends: West <div class="figure" style="text-align: center"> <img src="data:image/png;base64,#shor-clark-poster-2025_files/figure-html/unnamed-chunk-14-1.png" alt="State Bill Sponsorship Trends by State, West" width="90%" /> <p class="caption">State Bill Sponsorship Trends by State, West</p> </div> --- # Legislator-level vote model (distance measure) - We model legislative votes on climate bills as a function of the (absolute) distance between the legislator and the bill sponsor - We control for district opinion measured via Republican presidential vote share - We have three separate models for bill sponsorship: Democratic, Republican, and Bipartisan - As distance goes up, the legislator is less likely to vote for the bill
Democratic
Bipartisan
Republican
District Presidential Vote
-0.100***
-0.057***
-0.047***
(0.008)
(0.009)
(0.014)
Legislator-Bill Ideological Distance
-0.181***
-0.197***
-0.216***
(0.007)
(0.009)
(0.011)
N
87,010
78,610
39,685
Standard errors displayed in parens. *p<0.05; **p<0.01; ***p<0.001
--- # Next steps - We completed an energy and climate survey timed to the 2024 elections - We are working on the 2nd wave of the survey, coauthoring with economist Soren Anderson (Michigan State) - This survey will embed a survey experiment to generate estimates of _willingness to pay_ for a variety of climate policy interventions - This will help us to understand the political economy of climate policy in the states