This document currently outlines my progress on the media conditions for the experiment. I have conducted a lot of research on media priming effects on stereotypes (e.g., race, gender), to see how best to apply practices to our examination of accent stereotypes.
I have added some important points to consider, and current media clips that I have sourced.
After conducting research into media effects/priming literature, an importnat point to acknowledge is the perceived realism of the exposure material. Perceived realism (PR) refers to the similarity between events and characters in mediated environments and those in real life (Shapiro & Click, 2005). For instance, news content tends to have higher PR than films (Shapiro, 1990). Research shows that media with higher PR influences viewer attitudes, beliefs, and behaviours more significantly (Potter, 1988; Taylor, 2005) by promoting deeper information processing and greater memory accessibility, which will have subsequent greater weighting when activating stereotypes for evaluative formations (Huston et al., 1995, Drager, 2016). High-PR content, whether stereotypical or counter-stereotypical, has been found to strongly impact stereotype formation and moderation (Murphy et al., 1998). For example, counter-stereotypical news content significantly reduces implicit gender stereotypes compared to entertainment media (Choe, 2008).
I think that the inclusion of both news and entertainment (various PR levels) media in the stimuli is the best course of action for the following reasons:
Below outlines the currently proposed selection process, found in other media priming studies on stereotypes and bias (note: who did not do a prior content analysis):
Below are the current media clips for the 3 conditions (stereotypic/counterstereotypic/control). All materials have been retrieved from publically available resources. Note: some video quality has been lost when re-uploading some of the clips to youtube for them to be viewable on this page (better quality on my computer).
The experimental condition materials possess key ‘identifiers’ of stereotypes and counterstereotypes of Glaswegian. Both fictional and factual clips have been provided, to give additional levels of perceived realism.
It is important to note the definition of counterstereotypical media by Hoover et al (1998):
Counterstereotypical media is not merely the positive elements of the cultural stereotype (e.g., african americans are musically gifted), but that they stress attributes that directly contradict any element (positive or negative) of the prevailing stereotype.
This is an example of the wildlife documentary, containing no speech. I have over an hour’s footage, and can amend duration to match experimental conditions once they are devised.
I have not read so far any media effects research including neutral content in the actual stereotypical/counterstereotypical priming stimulus.
However, it is something I think is worth thinking about some more, and whether we think it could cause participant awareness.
By neutral videos that could be played between each experimental clip in the condition, it could be something like the following (which could be a filler). Although, this may cause unwanted effects of mitigating the experimental stimuli influence
Note: Videos to be played with no sound.