Descriptive Statistics
Recipient-Correlation
Correlation Matrix
|
|
r-occa-special
|
r-rela-close-giver
|
r-rela-close-other
|
r-person-degree
|
r-uni-degree
|
r-happy
|
r-like
|
r-special
|
r-grateful
|
r-closenesswithgiver
|
r-closenesswithother
|
r-connected
|
|
r-occa-special
|
1.000
|
0.647
|
0.260
|
0.367
|
-0.149
|
0.595
|
0.596
|
0.694
|
0.536
|
0.665
|
0.394
|
0.350
|
|
r-rela-close-giver
|
0.647
|
1.000
|
0.465
|
0.447
|
-0.251
|
0.502
|
0.441
|
0.573
|
0.429
|
0.782
|
0.491
|
0.421
|
|
r-rela-close-other
|
0.260
|
0.465
|
1.000
|
0.123
|
-0.205
|
0.283
|
0.337
|
0.337
|
0.255
|
0.385
|
0.700
|
0.508
|
|
r-person-degree
|
0.367
|
0.447
|
0.123
|
1.000
|
-0.303
|
0.259
|
0.208
|
0.452
|
0.277
|
0.401
|
0.257
|
0.302
|
|
r-uni-degree
|
-0.149
|
-0.251
|
-0.205
|
-0.303
|
1.000
|
-0.146
|
-0.152
|
-0.211
|
-0.128
|
-0.136
|
-0.177
|
-0.195
|
|
r-happy
|
0.595
|
0.502
|
0.283
|
0.259
|
-0.146
|
1.000
|
0.913
|
0.810
|
0.798
|
0.642
|
0.466
|
0.347
|
|
r-like
|
0.596
|
0.441
|
0.337
|
0.208
|
-0.152
|
0.913
|
1.000
|
0.787
|
0.828
|
0.644
|
0.503
|
0.391
|
|
r-special
|
0.694
|
0.573
|
0.337
|
0.452
|
-0.211
|
0.810
|
0.787
|
1.000
|
0.789
|
0.739
|
0.521
|
0.534
|
|
r-grateful
|
0.536
|
0.429
|
0.255
|
0.277
|
-0.128
|
0.798
|
0.828
|
0.789
|
1.000
|
0.665
|
0.453
|
0.407
|
|
r-closenesswithgiver
|
0.665
|
0.782
|
0.385
|
0.401
|
-0.136
|
0.642
|
0.644
|
0.739
|
0.665
|
1.000
|
0.549
|
0.495
|
|
r-closenesswithother
|
0.394
|
0.491
|
0.700
|
0.257
|
-0.177
|
0.466
|
0.503
|
0.521
|
0.453
|
0.549
|
1.000
|
0.667
|
|
r-connected
|
0.350
|
0.421
|
0.508
|
0.302
|
-0.195
|
0.347
|
0.391
|
0.534
|
0.407
|
0.495
|
0.667
|
1.000
|
Giver-Correlation
Correlation Matrix
|
|
g-occa-special
|
g-rela-close
|
g-person-degree
|
g-uni-degree
|
g-like
|
g-satisfied
|
g-strengthen
|
|
g-occa-special
|
1.000
|
0.606
|
0.410
|
-0.107
|
0.366
|
0.317
|
0.269
|
|
g-rela-close
|
0.606
|
1.000
|
0.282
|
-0.100
|
0.283
|
0.169
|
0.082
|
|
g-person-degree
|
0.410
|
0.282
|
1.000
|
-0.077
|
0.282
|
0.195
|
0.411
|
|
g-uni-degree
|
-0.107
|
-0.100
|
-0.077
|
1.000
|
0.117
|
0.067
|
-0.131
|
|
g-like
|
0.366
|
0.283
|
0.282
|
0.117
|
1.000
|
0.781
|
0.436
|
|
g-satisfied
|
0.317
|
0.169
|
0.195
|
0.067
|
0.781
|
1.000
|
0.330
|
|
g-strengthen
|
0.269
|
0.082
|
0.411
|
-0.131
|
0.436
|
0.330
|
1.000
|
Recipient-Personalization Degree
Recipient-The Highest Personalization Degree (=7)
Recipient-The Highest Personalization Degree (=6)
Recipient-The Lowest Personalization Degree (=1)
Recipient-The Lowest Personalization Degree (=2)
Giver-Personalization Degree
Giver-The Highest Personalization Degree (=7)
Giver-The Highest Personalization Degree (=6)
Giver-The Lowest Personalization Degree (=1)
Giver-The Lowest Personalization Degree (=2)
Other Data Analysis of Recipient
Recipient-Occasion Specialness
Recipient-Who Gave the Gift
Recipient-Initial Closeness with the Giver
Recipient-Initial Closeness with Other Recipients
Recipient-Recipients Number
Recipient-Personalized or Not
Recipient-Aware of the gifts other recipients received
Recipient DVs-Specialness
Recipient DVs-Gratefulness
Recipient DVs-Closeness with Giver
Recipient DVs-Closeness with Other
Recipient DVs-Connection with Other Recipients
Other Data Analysis of Giver
Giver-Occasion Specialness
Giver-Who were the recipients of your gift?
Giver-Initial Closeness with the Recipients
Giver DVs-likeness: How much do you think the recipients liked the
gifts you gave them?
Giver DVs-Satisfaction: How satisfied were you with the gifts you
selected?
Giver DVs- Do you think giving the gift strengthened your
relationship with the recipient?
Giver DVs-Suppose budget is not a concern. Which approach would you
prefer and why?