Survey Dashboard

2024 IOM South Sudan

Total number of respondents: 3685

All question numbers below are based on the “Key Variables for Descriptive Statistics” doc file.

All the descriptive calculated for index questions were based on the unimputed variable.

1) Socio-demographics

Languages

Entire sample

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
Bari	1331	0.36
Arabic	742	0.20
Dinka	541	0.15
Nuer	402	0.11
Murle	399	0.11
Shilluk	207	0.06
English	28	0.01
Zande	25	0.01
Luo	10	0.00

By county

Q1.5_County	Q0.2	answers	percentage
Yei	Arabic	157	0.38
Yei	Bari	220	0.54
Yei	Dinka	6	0.01
Yei	English	2	0.00
Yei	Luo	1	0.00
Yei	Nuer	1	0.00
Yei	Shilluk	1	0.00
Yei	Zande	22	0.05
Wau	Arabic	387	0.96
Wau	Dinka	2	0.00
Wau	English	5	0.01
Wau	Luo	8	0.02
Rubkona	Murle	1	0.00
Rubkona	Nuer	398	1.00
Rubkona	Zande	1	0.00
Pibor	Arabic	3	0.01
Pibor	English	4	0.01
Pibor	Murle	397	0.98
Pibor	Shilluk	3	0.01
Morobo	Arabic	93	0.23
Morobo	Bari	305	0.75
Morobo	Dinka	3	0.01
Morobo	Murle	1	0.00
Morobo	Shilluk	1	0.00
Morobo	Zande	1	0.00
Malakal	Arabic	101	0.24
Malakal	Dinka	102	0.24
Malakal	English	15	0.04
Malakal	Nuer	3	0.01
Malakal	Shilluk	200	0.48
Lainya	Bari	410	0.99
Lainya	Luo	1	0.00
Lainya	Shilluk	2	0.00
Lainya	Zande	1	0.00
Kajo-keji	Arabic	1	0.00
Kajo-keji	Bari	395	0.99
Kajo-keji	English	2	0.01
Bor South	Bari	1	0.00
Bor South	Dinka	428	1.00

County

Entire sample

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
Bor South	429	0.12
Malakal	421	0.11
Lainya	414	0.11
Yei	410	0.11
Pibor	407	0.11
Morobo	404	0.11
Wau	402	0.11
Rubkona	400	0.11
Kajo-keji	398	0.11

Payam

Entire sample

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
Bor	221	0.06
Yei_Town	216	0.06
Lainya	210	0.06
Lire	205	0.06
Pibor	204	0.06
Bagari	202	0.05
Kimba	200	0.05
Rubkona	199	0.05
Nyepo	193	0.05
Ogod	150	0.04
Malakal_North	124	0.03
Nhialdiu	121	0.03
Baidit	105	0.03
Gulumbi	104	0.03
Mukaya	104	0.03
Jalle	103	0.03
Lekuangole	102	0.03
Gumruk	101	0.03
Kopera	100	0.03
Lujulo	100	0.03
Tore	100	0.03
Wau_North	100	0.03
Wau_South	100	0.03
Mugwo	94	0.03
Panhiany	80	0.02
Malakal_Centre	70	0.02
Lelo	51	0.01
Malakal_South	26	0.01

By county

Q1.5_County	Q1.5_Payam	answers	percentage
Yei	Mugwo	94	0.23
Yei	Tore	100	0.24
Yei	Yei_Town	216	0.53
Wau	Bagari	202	0.50
Wau	Wau_North	100	0.25
Wau	Wau_South	100	0.25
Rubkona	Nhialdiu	121	0.30
Rubkona	Panhiany	80	0.20
Rubkona	Rubkona	199	0.50
Pibor	Gumruk	101	0.25
Pibor	Lekuangole	102	0.25
Pibor	Pibor	204	0.50
Morobo	Gulumbi	104	0.26
Morobo	Kimba	200	0.50
Morobo	Lujulo	100	0.25
Malakal	Lelo	51	0.12
Malakal	Malakal_Centre	70	0.17
Malakal	Malakal_North	124	0.29
Malakal	Malakal_South	26	0.06
Malakal	Ogod	150	0.36
Lainya	Kopera	100	0.24
Lainya	Lainya	210	0.51
Lainya	Mukaya	104	0.25
Kajo-keji	Lire	205	0.52
Kajo-keji	Nyepo	193	0.48
Bor South	Baidit	105	0.24
Bor South	Bor	221	0.52
Bor South	Jalle	103	0.24

Sex

Entire sample

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
Female	2261	0.61
Male	1424	0.39

By county

Q1.5_County	Q2.1	answers	percentage
Yei	Female	205	0.50
Yei	Male	205	0.50
Wau	Female	257	0.64
Wau	Male	145	0.36
Rubkona	Female	336	0.84
Rubkona	Male	64	0.16
Pibor	Female	269	0.66
Pibor	Male	138	0.34
Morobo	Female	206	0.51
Morobo	Male	198	0.49
Malakal	Female	307	0.73
Malakal	Male	114	0.27
Lainya	Female	169	0.41
Lainya	Male	245	0.59
Kajo-keji	Female	209	0.53
Kajo-keji	Male	189	0.47
Bor South	Female	303	0.71
Bor South	Male	126	0.29

Age

Entire sample

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
31 to 40	1348	0.37
41 to 50	969	0.26
18 to 30	844	0.23
51 to 60	395	0.11
61 and above	129	0.04

By county

Q1.5_County	Q2.2	answers	percentage
Yei	18 to 30	71	0.17
Yei	31 to 40	158	0.39
Yei	41 to 50	122	0.30
Yei	51 to 60	38	0.09
Yei	61 and above	21	0.05
Wau	18 to 30	100	0.25
Wau	31 to 40	159	0.40
Wau	41 to 50	90	0.22
Wau	51 to 60	35	0.09
Wau	61 and above	18	0.04
Rubkona	18 to 30	104	0.26
Rubkona	31 to 40	157	0.39
Rubkona	41 to 50	91	0.23
Rubkona	51 to 60	39	0.10
Rubkona	61 and above	9	0.02
Pibor	18 to 30	90	0.22
Pibor	31 to 40	159	0.39
Pibor	41 to 50	128	0.31
Pibor	51 to 60	27	0.07
Pibor	61 and above	3	0.01
Morobo	18 to 30	113	0.28
Morobo	31 to 40	158	0.39
Morobo	41 to 50	89	0.22
Morobo	51 to 60	27	0.07
Morobo	61 and above	17	0.04
Malakal	18 to 30	90	0.21
Malakal	31 to 40	161	0.38
Malakal	41 to 50	106	0.25
Malakal	51 to 60	48	0.11
Malakal	61 and above	16	0.04
Lainya	18 to 30	65	0.16
Lainya	31 to 40	124	0.30
Lainya	41 to 50	129	0.31
Lainya	51 to 60	74	0.18
Lainya	61 and above	22	0.05
Kajo-keji	18 to 30	80	0.20
Kajo-keji	31 to 40	123	0.31
Kajo-keji	41 to 50	101	0.25
Kajo-keji	51 to 60	76	0.19
Kajo-keji	61 and above	18	0.05
Bor South	18 to 30	131	0.31
Bor South	31 to 40	149	0.35
Bor South	41 to 50	113	0.26
Bor South	51 to 60	31	0.07
Bor South	61 and above	5	0.01

Which of the following information sources do you rely on most?

Entire sample

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
Radio	1449	0.39
Word of mouth	1001	0.27
Church or other religious institution	842	0.23
Mobile phone (specify if smart or basic?)	179	0.05
Internet	107	0.03
-2. Prefer not to answer	86	0.02
Television	12	0.00
Other (please specify):	6	0.00
Print newspaper	3	0.00

By county

Q1.5_County	Q2.8	answers	percentage
Yei	-2. Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Yei	Radio	199	0.49
Yei	Church or other religious institution	135	0.33
Yei	Word of mouth	56	0.14
Yei	Mobile phone (specify if smart or basic?)	17	0.04
Yei	Internet	2	0.00
Wau	-2. Prefer not to answer	16	0.04
Wau	Radio	240	0.60
Wau	Church or other religious institution	19	0.05
Wau	Word of mouth	102	0.25
Wau	Mobile phone (specify if smart or basic?)	14	0.03
Wau	Television	5	0.01
Wau	Internet	6	0.01
Rubkona	-2. Prefer not to answer	33	0.08
Rubkona	Radio	102	0.26
Rubkona	Church or other religious institution	29	0.07
Rubkona	Word of mouth	169	0.42
Rubkona	Mobile phone (specify if smart or basic?)	42	0.10
Rubkona	Television	2	0.00
Rubkona	Internet	22	0.06
Rubkona	Other (please specify):	1	0.00
Pibor	-2. Prefer not to answer	2	0.00
Pibor	Radio	83	0.20
Pibor	Church or other religious institution	60	0.15
Pibor	Print newspaper	1	0.00
Pibor	Word of mouth	239	0.59
Pibor	Mobile phone (specify if smart or basic?)	20	0.05
Pibor	Internet	2	0.00
Morobo	Radio	110	0.27
Morobo	Church or other religious institution	146	0.36
Morobo	Word of mouth	99	0.25
Morobo	Mobile phone (specify if smart or basic?)	40	0.10
Morobo	Television	1	0.00
Morobo	Internet	5	0.01
Morobo	Other (please specify):	3	0.01
Malakal	-2. Prefer not to answer	19	0.05
Malakal	Radio	229	0.54
Malakal	Church or other religious institution	34	0.08
Malakal	Print newspaper	1	0.00
Malakal	Word of mouth	85	0.20
Malakal	Mobile phone (specify if smart or basic?)	5	0.01
Malakal	Television	3	0.01
Malakal	Internet	45	0.11
Lainya	-2. Prefer not to answer	9	0.02
Lainya	Radio	140	0.34
Lainya	Church or other religious institution	166	0.40
Lainya	Print newspaper	1	0.00
Lainya	Word of mouth	61	0.15
Lainya	Mobile phone (specify if smart or basic?)	24	0.06
Lainya	Internet	11	0.03
Lainya	Other (please specify):	2	0.00
Kajo-keji	-2. Prefer not to answer	4	0.01
Kajo-keji	Radio	88	0.22
Kajo-keji	Church or other religious institution	165	0.41
Kajo-keji	Word of mouth	125	0.31
Kajo-keji	Mobile phone (specify if smart or basic?)	13	0.03
Kajo-keji	Internet	3	0.01
Bor South	-2. Prefer not to answer	2	0.00
Bor South	Radio	258	0.60
Bor South	Church or other religious institution	88	0.21
Bor South	Word of mouth	65	0.15
Bor South	Mobile phone (specify if smart or basic?)	4	0.01
Bor South	Television	1	0.00
Bor South	Internet	11	0.03

By sex

How to interpret the table? Example: Within the Male, 42% use Radio as their main source of information. Within Female, its 38%.

Q2.1	Q2.8	answers	percentage
Male	-2. Prefer not to answer	16	0.01
Male	Radio	595	0.42
Male	Church or other religious institution	351	0.25
Male	Print newspaper	2	0.00
Male	Word of mouth	320	0.22
Male	Mobile phone (specify if smart or basic?)	80	0.06
Male	Television	5	0.00
Male	Internet	52	0.04
Male	Other (please specify):	3	0.00
Female	-2. Prefer not to answer	70	0.03
Female	Radio	854	0.38
Female	Church or other religious institution	491	0.22
Female	Print newspaper	1	0.00
Female	Word of mouth	681	0.30
Female	Mobile phone (specify if smart or basic?)	99	0.04
Female	Television	7	0.00
Female	Internet	55	0.02
Female	Other (please specify):	3	0.00

Religion

Entire sample

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
Christianity	3421	0.93
Indigenous/traditional faiths	192	0.05
Islam	66	0.02
-2. Prefer not to answer	6	0.00

By county

Q1.5_County	Q2.10	answers	percentage
Yei	Christianity	405	0.99
Yei	Islam	5	0.01
Wau	Christianity	384	0.96
Wau	Indigenous/traditional faiths	2	0.00
Wau	Islam	16	0.04
Rubkona	-2. Prefer not to answer	6	0.01
Rubkona	Christianity	272	0.68
Rubkona	Indigenous/traditional faiths	122	0.30
Pibor	Christianity	357	0.88
Pibor	Indigenous/traditional faiths	41	0.10
Pibor	Islam	9	0.02
Morobo	Christianity	392	0.97
Morobo	Indigenous/traditional faiths	2	0.00
Morobo	Islam	10	0.02
Malakal	Christianity	392	0.93
Malakal	Indigenous/traditional faiths	21	0.05
Malakal	Islam	8	0.02
Lainya	Christianity	412	1.00
Lainya	Indigenous/traditional faiths	1	0.00
Lainya	Islam	1	0.00
Kajo-keji	Christianity	381	0.96
Kajo-keji	Indigenous/traditional faiths	2	0.01
Kajo-keji	Islam	15	0.04
Bor South	Christianity	426	0.99
Bor South	Indigenous/traditional faiths	1	0.00
Bor South	Islam	2	0.00

Ethnicity

Entire sample

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
Bari	691	0.19
Dinka	658	0.18
Kakwa	462	0.13
Nuer	412	0.11
Murle	378	0.10
Kuku	252	0.07
Other (please specify)	225	0.06
Shilluk	222	0.06
Bongo	86	0.02
Fertit	75	0.02
Azande	60	0.02
Ndogo	53	0.01
Baka	53	0.01
Bviri	27	0.01
Anyuak	14	0.00
Mundari	10	0.00
Acholi	2	0.00
Didinga	2	0.00
-2. Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Dungotona	1	0.00
Lndi	1	0.00

By county

Q1.5_County	Q2.11	answers	percentage
Yei	Acholi	1	0.00
Yei	Kakwa	234	0.57
Yei	Kuku	10	0.02
Yei	Mundari	6	0.01
Yei	Shilluk	3	0.01
Yei	Other (please specify)	21	0.05
Yei	Azande	41	0.10
Yei	Baka	47	0.11
Yei	Bari	36	0.09
Yei	Dinka	11	0.03
Wau	Acholi	1	0.00
Wau	Fertit	73	0.18
Wau	Mundari	1	0.00
Wau	Ndogo	53	0.13
Wau	Other (please specify)	121	0.30
Wau	Azande	16	0.04
Wau	Baka	3	0.01
Wau	Bari	2	0.00
Wau	Bongo	84	0.21
Wau	Bviri	19	0.05
Wau	Didinga	1	0.00
Wau	Dinka	28	0.07
Rubkona	Lndi	1	0.00
Rubkona	Murle	1	0.00
Rubkona	Nuer	388	0.97
Rubkona	Shilluk	1	0.00
Rubkona	Other (please specify)	9	0.02
Pibor	Fertit	2	0.00
Pibor	Kakwa	1	0.00
Pibor	Mundari	1	0.00
Pibor	Murle	377	0.93
Pibor	Nuer	2	0.00
Pibor	Anyuak	11	0.03
Pibor	Shilluk	1	0.00
Pibor	Azande	1	0.00
Pibor	Bari	2	0.00
Pibor	Bviri	2	0.00
Pibor	Didinga	1	0.00
Pibor	Dinka	6	0.01
Morobo	-2. Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Morobo	Kakwa	224	0.55
Morobo	Kuku	2	0.00
Morobo	Anyuak	3	0.01
Morobo	Other (please specify)	71	0.18
Morobo	Azande	2	0.00
Morobo	Baka	2	0.00
Morobo	Bari	91	0.23
Morobo	Dinka	8	0.02
Malakal	Mundari	1	0.00
Malakal	Nuer	22	0.05
Malakal	Shilluk	217	0.52
Malakal	Other (please specify)	2	0.00
Malakal	Bari	1	0.00
Malakal	Bongo	1	0.00
Malakal	Dinka	177	0.42
Lainya	Dungotona	1	0.00
Lainya	Kakwa	3	0.01
Lainya	Other (please specify)	1	0.00
Lainya	Bari	406	0.98
Lainya	Bongo	1	0.00
Lainya	Bviri	2	0.00
Kajo-keji	Kuku	240	0.60
Kajo-keji	Bari	153	0.38
Kajo-keji	Bviri	4	0.01
Kajo-keji	Dinka	1	0.00
Bor South	Mundari	1	0.00
Bor South	Baka	1	0.00
Bor South	Dinka	427	1.00

2) Mobility & Displacement

Q2.4 (Mobility): To what degree do you feel that you have the ability to choose the location in which you live?

Entire sample

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
Some ability	1545	0.42
No ability	1401	0.38
Total ability	724	0.20
-2. Prefer not to answer	15	0.00

By county

Q1.5_County	Q2.4	answers	percentage
Yei	No ability	134	0.33
Yei	Some ability	205	0.50
Yei	Total ability	71	0.17
Wau	-2. Prefer not to answer	2	0.00
Wau	No ability	230	0.57
Wau	Some ability	138	0.34
Wau	Total ability	32	0.08
Rubkona	No ability	152	0.38
Rubkona	Some ability	199	0.50
Rubkona	Total ability	49	0.12
Pibor	-2. Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Pibor	No ability	167	0.41
Pibor	Some ability	162	0.40
Pibor	Total ability	77	0.19
Morobo	-2. Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Morobo	No ability	158	0.39
Morobo	Some ability	162	0.40
Morobo	Total ability	83	0.21
Malakal	-2. Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Malakal	No ability	130	0.31
Malakal	Some ability	148	0.35
Malakal	Total ability	142	0.34
Lainya	-2. Prefer not to answer	3	0.01
Lainya	No ability	157	0.38
Lainya	Some ability	166	0.40
Lainya	Total ability	88	0.21
Kajo-keji	-2. Prefer not to answer	5	0.01
Kajo-keji	No ability	121	0.30
Kajo-keji	Some ability	134	0.34
Kajo-keji	Total ability	138	0.35
Bor South	-2. Prefer not to answer	2	0.00
Bor South	No ability	152	0.35
Bor South	Some ability	231	0.54
Bor South	Total ability	44	0.10

By sex

Q2.1	Q2.4	answers	percentage
Male	-2. Prefer not to answer	7	0.00
Male	No ability	494	0.35
Male	Some ability	600	0.42
Male	Total ability	323	0.23
Female	-2. Prefer not to answer	8	0.00
Female	No ability	907	0.40
Female	Some ability	945	0.42
Female	Total ability	401	0.18

Q2.5 (Moved): Have you ever moved from one county to another?

Entire sample

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
No	1963	0.53
Yes	1716	0.47
Prefer not to answer	6	0.00

By county

Q1.5_County	Q2.5	answers	percentage
Yei	No	299	0.73
Yei	Yes	111	0.27
Wau	No	266	0.66
Wau	Yes	136	0.34
Rubkona	No	331	0.83
Rubkona	Yes	69	0.17
Pibor	No	268	0.66
Pibor	Prefer not to answer	3	0.01
Pibor	Yes	136	0.33
Morobo	No	138	0.34
Morobo	Yes	266	0.66
Malakal	No	163	0.39
Malakal	Yes	258	0.61
Lainya	No	228	0.55
Lainya	Yes	186	0.45
Kajo-keji	No	168	0.42
Kajo-keji	Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Kajo-keji	Yes	229	0.58
Bor South	No	102	0.24
Bor South	Prefer not to answer	2	0.00
Bor South	Yes	325	0.76

By sex

Q2.1	Q2.5	answers	percentage
Male	No	740	0.52
Male	Prefer not to answer	3	0.00
Male	Yes	681	0.48
Female	No	1223	0.54
Female	Prefer not to answer	3	0.00
Female	Yes	1035	0.46

Q2.5.1 (Reason Moved): If yes to Q2.5, Which of the following most accurately describes why you moved?

Entire sample

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
I fled for security or survival	1062	0.62
I moved for better economic opportunities	278	0.16
I moved for schooling	153	0.09
I moved for other reasons	129	0.08
I moved for marriage or related family reasons	90	0.05
-2. Prefer not to answer	4	0.00

By county

Q1.5_County	Q2.5.1	answers	percentage
Yei	I fled for security or survival	78	0.70
Yei	I moved for better economic opportunities	1	0.01
Yei	I moved for schooling	4	0.04
Yei	I moved for marriage or related family reasons	20	0.18
Yei	I moved for other reasons	8	0.07
Wau	I fled for security or survival	55	0.40
Wau	I moved for better economic opportunities	43	0.32
Wau	I moved for schooling	10	0.07
Wau	I moved for marriage or related family reasons	11	0.08
Wau	I moved for other reasons	17	0.12
Rubkona	-2. Prefer not to answer	1	0.01
Rubkona	I fled for security or survival	20	0.29
Rubkona	I moved for better economic opportunities	13	0.19
Rubkona	I moved for schooling	14	0.20
Rubkona	I moved for marriage or related family reasons	7	0.10
Rubkona	I moved for other reasons	14	0.20
Pibor	-2. Prefer not to answer	2	0.01
Pibor	I fled for security or survival	65	0.48
Pibor	I moved for better economic opportunities	38	0.28
Pibor	I moved for schooling	11	0.08
Pibor	I moved for marriage or related family reasons	3	0.02
Pibor	I moved for other reasons	17	0.12
Morobo	I fled for security or survival	233	0.88
Morobo	I moved for better economic opportunities	14	0.05
Morobo	I moved for schooling	14	0.05
Morobo	I moved for marriage or related family reasons	4	0.02
Morobo	I moved for other reasons	1	0.00
Malakal	I fled for security or survival	138	0.53
Malakal	I moved for better economic opportunities	40	0.16
Malakal	I moved for schooling	58	0.22
Malakal	I moved for marriage or related family reasons	17	0.07
Malakal	I moved for other reasons	5	0.02
Lainya	I fled for security or survival	144	0.77
Lainya	I moved for better economic opportunities	22	0.12
Lainya	I moved for schooling	14	0.08
Lainya	I moved for marriage or related family reasons	4	0.02
Lainya	I moved for other reasons	2	0.01
Kajo-keji	-2. Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Kajo-keji	I fled for security or survival	181	0.79
Kajo-keji	I moved for better economic opportunities	16	0.07
Kajo-keji	I moved for schooling	12	0.05
Kajo-keji	I moved for marriage or related family reasons	3	0.01
Kajo-keji	I moved for other reasons	16	0.07
Bor South	I fled for security or survival	148	0.46
Bor South	I moved for better economic opportunities	91	0.28
Bor South	I moved for schooling	16	0.05
Bor South	I moved for marriage or related family reasons	21	0.06
Bor South	I moved for other reasons	49	0.15

By sex

Q2.1	Q2.5.1	answers	percentage
Male	-2. Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Male	I fled for security or survival	444	0.65
Male	I moved for better economic opportunities	121	0.18
Male	I moved for schooling	61	0.09
Male	I moved for marriage or related family reasons	24	0.04
Male	I moved for other reasons	30	0.04
Female	-2. Prefer not to answer	3	0.00
Female	I fled for security or survival	618	0.60
Female	I moved for better economic opportunities	157	0.15
Female	I moved for schooling	92	0.09
Female	I moved for marriage or related family reasons	66	0.06
Female	I moved for other reasons	99	0.10

Q2.5.2 (Forced displaced then return): If answer “1” to Q2.5.1 (i.e. fled for security/survival), do you currently live in the county in which you were born?

Entire sample

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
Yes	898	0.85
No	163	0.15
Prefer not to answer	1	0.00

By county

Q1.5_County	Q2.5.2	answers	percentage
Yei	No	11	0.14
Yei	Yes	67	0.86
Wau	No	10	0.18
Wau	Yes	45	0.82
Rubkona	No	3	0.15
Rubkona	Yes	17	0.85
Pibor	No	15	0.23
Pibor	Yes	50	0.77
Morobo	No	16	0.07
Morobo	Yes	217	0.93
Malakal	No	47	0.34
Malakal	Yes	91	0.66
Lainya	No	33	0.23
Lainya	Yes	111	0.77
Kajo-keji	No	5	0.03
Kajo-keji	Yes	176	0.97
Bor South	No	23	0.16
Bor South	Prefer not to answer	1	0.01
Bor South	Yes	124	0.84

By sex

Q2.1	Q2.5.2	answers	percentage
Male	No	56	0.13
Male	Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Male	Yes	387	0.87
Female	No	107	0.17
Female	Yes	511	0.83

Q2.6 (Intention to move): Do you intend to leave [this village] and live elsewhere in the next 5 years?

Entire sample

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
No	2803	0.76
Yes	858	0.23
Prefer not to answer	24	0.01

By county

Q1.5_County	Q2.6	answers	percentage
Yei	No	378	0.92
Yei	Yes	32	0.08
Wau	No	295	0.73
Wau	Prefer not to answer	14	0.03
Wau	Yes	93	0.23
Rubkona	No	332	0.83
Rubkona	Yes	68	0.17
Pibor	No	282	0.69
Pibor	Prefer not to answer	2	0.00
Pibor	Yes	123	0.30
Morobo	No	320	0.79
Morobo	Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Morobo	Yes	83	0.21
Malakal	No	245	0.58
Malakal	Yes	176	0.42
Lainya	No	365	0.88
Lainya	Prefer not to answer	2	0.00
Lainya	Yes	47	0.11
Kajo-keji	No	351	0.88
Kajo-keji	Yes	47	0.12
Bor South	No	235	0.55
Bor South	Prefer not to answer	5	0.01
Bor South	Yes	189	0.44

By sex

Q2.1	Q2.6	answers	percentage
Male	No	1095	0.77
Male	Prefer not to answer	6	0.00
Male	Yes	323	0.23
Female	No	1708	0.76
Female	Prefer not to answer	18	0.01
Female	Yes	535	0.24

Q2.6.1 (Where intend to move): If yes to Q2.6, where do you intend to move?

Entire sample

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
Return to my original place of residence	341	0.40
Move to another place in the same county	250	0.29
Move to another county in South Sudan	193	0.22
Move to another country	65	0.08
-2. Prefer not to answer	9	0.01

By county

Q1.5_County	Q2.6.1	answers	percentage
Yei	-2. Prefer not to answer	2	0.06
Yei	Return to my original place of residence	12	0.38
Yei	Move to another place in the same county	11	0.34
Yei	Move to another county in South Sudan	7	0.22
Wau	-2. Prefer not to answer	1	0.01
Wau	Return to my original place of residence	45	0.48
Wau	Move to another place in the same county	29	0.31
Wau	Move to another county in South Sudan	17	0.18
Wau	Move to another country	1	0.01
Rubkona	Return to my original place of residence	43	0.63
Rubkona	Move to another place in the same county	12	0.18
Rubkona	Move to another county in South Sudan	5	0.07
Rubkona	Move to another country	8	0.12
Pibor	-2. Prefer not to answer	4	0.03
Pibor	Return to my original place of residence	30	0.24
Pibor	Move to another place in the same county	42	0.34
Pibor	Move to another county in South Sudan	36	0.29
Pibor	Move to another country	11	0.09
Morobo	Return to my original place of residence	40	0.48
Morobo	Move to another place in the same county	11	0.13
Morobo	Move to another county in South Sudan	16	0.19
Morobo	Move to another country	16	0.19
Malakal	Return to my original place of residence	62	0.35
Malakal	Move to another place in the same county	32	0.18
Malakal	Move to another county in South Sudan	73	0.41
Malakal	Move to another country	9	0.05
Lainya	-2. Prefer not to answer	2	0.04
Lainya	Return to my original place of residence	33	0.70
Lainya	Move to another place in the same county	8	0.17
Lainya	Move to another county in South Sudan	3	0.06
Lainya	Move to another country	1	0.02
Kajo-keji	Return to my original place of residence	29	0.62
Kajo-keji	Move to another place in the same county	6	0.13
Kajo-keji	Move to another county in South Sudan	2	0.04
Kajo-keji	Move to another country	10	0.21
Bor South	Return to my original place of residence	47	0.25
Bor South	Move to another place in the same county	99	0.52
Bor South	Move to another county in South Sudan	34	0.18
Bor South	Move to another country	9	0.05

By sex

Q2.1	Q2.6.1	answers	percentage
Male	-2. Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Male	Return to my original place of residence	137	0.42
Male	Move to another place in the same county	83	0.26
Male	Move to another county in South Sudan	75	0.23
Male	Move to another country	27	0.08
Female	-2. Prefer not to answer	8	0.01
Female	Return to my original place of residence	204	0.38
Female	Move to another place in the same county	167	0.31
Female	Move to another county in South Sudan	118	0.22
Female	Move to another country	38	0.07

3) Indexes

County	Human Fragility	Economic Fragility	Societal Fragility	Security Fragility	Political Fragility	Environmental Fragility
Bor South	49	54	29	77	61	60
Kajo-keji	39	59	29	61	47	55
Lainya	40	57	39	63	54	51
Malakal	46	47	31	59	58	49
Morobo	39	53	39	58	47	57
Pibor	51	60	53	64	54	57
Rubkona	38	69	32	59	64	66
Wau	45	46	33	73	51	55
Yei	36	53	36	53	58	48

4) Human Fragility

All the answers are on a scale of 0-1, i.e. can have the following values: 0, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1. The higher, the more fragile.

The higher, the more fragile.

Index Questions

Q5.5.1: Over the past year, how often, if ever, have you or anyone in your family gone without enough foor to eat?

Entire sample

mean
0.35

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
Just once or twice	1520	0.41
Several times	869	0.24
Never	711	0.19
Many times	364	0.10
Always	218	0.06
_2. Prefer Not to Answer	3	0.00

By county

County	Mean Response (0 to 1)
Bor South	0.42
Kajo-keji	0.28
Lainya	0.30
Malakal	0.41
Morobo	0.33
Pibor	0.41
Rubkona	0.26
Wau	0.47
Yei	0.30

Q1.5_County	Q5.5.1_raw	answers	percentage
Yei	Never	57	0.14
Yei	Just once or twice	224	0.55
Yei	Several times	115	0.28
Yei	Many times	12	0.03
Yei	Always	2	0.00
Wau	Never	74	0.18
Wau	Just once or twice	79	0.20
Wau	Several times	104	0.26
Wau	Many times	107	0.27
Wau	Always	37	0.09
Wau	_2. Prefer Not to Answer	1	0.00
Rubkona	Never	143	0.36
Rubkona	Just once or twice	137	0.34
Rubkona	Several times	88	0.22
Rubkona	Many times	19	0.05
Rubkona	Always	12	0.03
Rubkona	_2. Prefer Not to Answer	1	0.00
Pibor	Never	29	0.07
Pibor	Just once or twice	146	0.36
Pibor	Several times	184	0.45
Pibor	Many times	40	0.10
Pibor	Always	8	0.02
Morobo	Never	80	0.20
Morobo	Just once or twice	179	0.44
Morobo	Several times	100	0.25
Morobo	Many times	31	0.08
Morobo	Always	14	0.03
Malakal	Never	110	0.26
Malakal	Just once or twice	110	0.26
Malakal	Several times	60	0.14
Malakal	Many times	99	0.24
Malakal	Always	42	0.10
Lainya	Never	69	0.17
Lainya	Just once or twice	245	0.59
Lainya	Several times	63	0.15
Lainya	Many times	18	0.04
Lainya	Always	19	0.05
Kajo-keji	Never	123	0.31
Kajo-keji	Just once or twice	183	0.46
Kajo-keji	Several times	50	0.13
Kajo-keji	Many times	10	0.03
Kajo-keji	Always	31	0.08
Kajo-keji	_2. Prefer Not to Answer	1	0.00
Bor South	Never	26	0.06
Bor South	Just once or twice	217	0.51
Bor South	Several times	105	0.24
Bor South	Many times	28	0.07
Bor South	Always	53	0.12

Q5.5.2: Over the past year, how often, if ever, have you or anyone in your family gone without enough clean water for home use?

Entire sample

mean
0.36

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
Just once or twice	1159	0.31
Never	1043	0.28
Several times	697	0.19
Many times	401	0.11
Always	383	0.10
_2. Prefer Not to Answer	2	0.00

By county

County	Mean Response (0 to 1)
Bor South	0.34
Kajo-keji	0.34
Lainya	0.43
Malakal	0.44
Morobo	0.29
Pibor	0.43
Rubkona	0.27
Wau	0.38
Yei	0.30

Q1.5_County	Q5.5.2_raw	answers	percentage
Yei	Never	120	0.29
Yei	Just once or twice	154	0.38
Yei	Several times	84	0.20
Yei	Many times	37	0.09
Yei	Always	15	0.04
Wau	Never	116	0.29
Wau	Just once or twice	79	0.20
Wau	Several times	100	0.25
Wau	Many times	86	0.21
Wau	Always	20	0.05
Wau	_2. Prefer Not to Answer	1	0.00
Rubkona	Never	185	0.46
Rubkona	Just once or twice	59	0.15
Rubkona	Several times	106	0.26
Rubkona	Many times	33	0.08
Rubkona	Always	17	0.04
Pibor	Never	32	0.08
Pibor	Just once or twice	154	0.38
Pibor	Several times	141	0.35
Pibor	Many times	60	0.15
Pibor	Always	20	0.05
Morobo	Never	180	0.45
Morobo	Just once or twice	89	0.22
Morobo	Several times	64	0.16
Morobo	Many times	35	0.09
Morobo	Always	36	0.09
Malakal	Never	105	0.25
Malakal	Just once or twice	131	0.31
Malakal	Several times	40	0.10
Malakal	Many times	46	0.11
Malakal	Always	99	0.24
Lainya	Never	77	0.19
Lainya	Just once or twice	154	0.37
Lainya	Several times	56	0.14
Lainya	Many times	65	0.16
Lainya	Always	62	0.15
Kajo-keji	Never	117	0.29
Kajo-keji	Just once or twice	163	0.41
Kajo-keji	Several times	37	0.09
Kajo-keji	Many times	18	0.05
Kajo-keji	Always	62	0.16
Kajo-keji	_2. Prefer Not to Answer	1	0.00
Bor South	Never	111	0.26
Bor South	Just once or twice	176	0.41
Bor South	Several times	69	0.16
Bor South	Many times	21	0.05
Bor South	Always	52	0.12

Q5.5.3: Over the past year, how often, if ever, have you or anyone in your family gone without necessary medicines or medical treatment?

Entire sample

mean
0.38

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
Just once or twice	1189	0.32
Never	854	0.23
Several times	830	0.23
Many times	489	0.13
Always	319	0.09
_2. Prefer Not to Answer	4	0.00

By county

County	Mean Response (0 to 1)
Bor South	0.46
Kajo-keji	0.35
Lainya	0.38
Malakal	0.38
Morobo	0.39
Pibor	0.42
Rubkona	0.25
Wau	0.42
Yei	0.36

Q1.5_County	Q5.5.3_raw	answers	percentage
Yei	Never	67	0.16
Yei	Just once or twice	160	0.39
Yei	Several times	126	0.31
Yei	Many times	46	0.11
Yei	Always	11	0.03
Wau	Never	89	0.22
Wau	Just once or twice	104	0.26
Wau	Several times	100	0.25
Wau	Many times	68	0.17
Wau	Always	41	0.10
Rubkona	Never	216	0.54
Rubkona	Just once or twice	66	0.16
Rubkona	Several times	50	0.12
Rubkona	Many times	41	0.10
Rubkona	Always	27	0.07
Pibor	Never	43	0.11
Pibor	Just once or twice	134	0.33
Pibor	Several times	161	0.40
Pibor	Many times	55	0.14
Pibor	Always	14	0.03
Morobo	Never	113	0.28
Morobo	Just once or twice	87	0.22
Morobo	Several times	104	0.26
Morobo	Many times	65	0.16
Morobo	Always	35	0.09
Malakal	Never	112	0.27
Malakal	Just once or twice	120	0.29
Malakal	Several times	93	0.22
Malakal	Many times	47	0.11
Malakal	Always	49	0.12
Lainya	Never	63	0.15
Lainya	Just once or twice	189	0.46
Lainya	Several times	77	0.19
Lainya	Many times	39	0.09
Lainya	Always	43	0.10
Lainya	_2. Prefer Not to Answer	3	0.01
Kajo-keji	Never	91	0.23
Kajo-keji	Just once or twice	167	0.42
Kajo-keji	Several times	55	0.14
Kajo-keji	Many times	55	0.14
Kajo-keji	Always	29	0.07
Kajo-keji	_2. Prefer Not to Answer	1	0.00
Bor South	Never	60	0.14
Bor South	Just once or twice	162	0.38
Bor South	Several times	64	0.15
Bor South	Many times	73	0.17
Bor South	Always	70	0.16

Q7.1: What type of shelter are you currently living in?

Entire sample

mean
0.41

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
Tukul	1955	0.53
Rakooba	1188	0.32
Bricked structure	450	0.12
No shelter	69	0.02
Other, specify	20	0.01
_2. Prefer not to answer	3	0.00

By county

County	Mean Response (0 to 1)
Bor South	0.49
Kajo-keji	0.33
Lainya	0.33
Malakal	0.47
Morobo	0.36
Pibor	0.65
Rubkona	0.50
Wau	0.28
Yei	0.28

Q1.5_County	Q7.1_raw	answers	percentage
Yei	Rakooba	15	0.04
Yei	Tukul	321	0.78
Yei	Bricked structure	74	0.18
Wau	No shelter	5	0.01
Wau	Rakooba	57	0.14
Wau	Tukul	213	0.53
Wau	Bricked structure	125	0.31
Wau	_2. Prefer not to answer	2	0.00
Rubkona	No shelter	2	0.00
Rubkona	Rakooba	202	0.50
Rubkona	Tukul	181	0.45
Rubkona	Bricked structure	11	0.03
Rubkona	Other, specify	4	0.01
Pibor	No shelter	11	0.03
Pibor	Rakooba	369	0.91
Pibor	Tukul	24	0.06
Pibor	Bricked structure	3	0.01
Morobo	No shelter	25	0.06
Morobo	Rakooba	32	0.08
Morobo	Tukul	296	0.73
Morobo	Bricked structure	50	0.12
Morobo	_2. Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Malakal	No shelter	18	0.04
Malakal	Rakooba	191	0.45
Malakal	Tukul	158	0.38
Malakal	Bricked structure	51	0.12
Malakal	Other, specify	3	0.01
Lainya	No shelter	4	0.01
Lainya	Rakooba	61	0.15
Lainya	Tukul	279	0.67
Lainya	Bricked structure	68	0.16
Lainya	Other, specify	2	0.00
Kajo-keji	No shelter	1	0.00
Kajo-keji	Rakooba	55	0.14
Kajo-keji	Tukul	284	0.71
Kajo-keji	Bricked structure	54	0.14
Kajo-keji	Other, specify	4	0.01
Bor South	No shelter	3	0.01
Bor South	Rakooba	206	0.48
Bor South	Tukul	199	0.46
Bor South	Bricked structure	14	0.03
Bor South	Other, specify	7	0.02

Q8.5.6: On a scale from 1 to 5, where 1 means “very unfrightened” and 5 means “very frightened,” how afraid are you of the sexual violence in your community?

Entire sample

mean
0.62

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
Frightened	1569	0.43
Unfrightened	693	0.19
Very frightened	670	0.18
Neither frightened nor unfrightened	464	0.13
Very unfrightened	232	0.06
Prefer not to respond	57	0.02

By county

County	Mean Response (0 to 1)
Bor South	0.75
Kajo-keji	0.60
Lainya	0.53
Malakal	0.61
Morobo	0.59
Pibor	0.64
Rubkona	0.62
Wau	0.71
Yei	0.55

Q1.5_County	Q8.5.6_raw	answers	percentage
Yei	Frightened	167	0.41
Yei	Neither frightened nor unfrightened	99	0.24
Yei	Unfrightened	99	0.24
Yei	Very frightened	24	0.06
Yei	Very unfrightened	21	0.05
Wau	Frightened	177	0.44
Wau	Neither frightened nor unfrightened	43	0.11
Wau	Prefer not to respond	10	0.02
Wau	Unfrightened	56	0.14
Wau	Very frightened	109	0.27
Wau	Very unfrightened	7	0.02
Rubkona	Frightened	140	0.35
Rubkona	Neither frightened nor unfrightened	24	0.06
Rubkona	Prefer not to respond	1	0.00
Rubkona	Unfrightened	24	0.06
Rubkona	Very frightened	124	0.31
Rubkona	Very unfrightened	87	0.22
Pibor	Frightened	203	0.50
Pibor	Neither frightened nor unfrightened	60	0.15
Pibor	Prefer not to respond	1	0.00
Pibor	Unfrightened	68	0.17
Pibor	Very frightened	59	0.14
Pibor	Very unfrightened	16	0.04
Morobo	Frightened	160	0.40
Morobo	Neither frightened nor unfrightened	29	0.07
Morobo	Prefer not to respond	2	0.00
Morobo	Unfrightened	98	0.24
Morobo	Very frightened	77	0.19
Morobo	Very unfrightened	38	0.09
Malakal	Frightened	212	0.50
Malakal	Neither frightened nor unfrightened	13	0.03
Malakal	Unfrightened	129	0.31
Malakal	Very frightened	61	0.14
Malakal	Very unfrightened	6	0.01
Lainya	Frightened	171	0.41
Lainya	Neither frightened nor unfrightened	79	0.19
Lainya	Prefer not to respond	2	0.00
Lainya	Unfrightened	98	0.24
Lainya	Very frightened	25	0.06
Lainya	Very unfrightened	39	0.09
Kajo-keji	Frightened	150	0.38
Kajo-keji	Neither frightened nor unfrightened	39	0.10
Kajo-keji	Prefer not to respond	41	0.10
Kajo-keji	Unfrightened	93	0.23
Kajo-keji	Very frightened	59	0.15
Kajo-keji	Very unfrightened	16	0.04
Bor South	Frightened	189	0.44
Bor South	Neither frightened nor unfrightened	78	0.18
Bor South	Unfrightened	28	0.07
Bor South	Very frightened	132	0.31
Bor South	Very unfrightened	2	0.00

Additional Question

Q11.2 Is water available to everyone?

Entire sample

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
Yes	2583	0.7
No	1091	0.3
Prefer not to answer	11	0.0

By county

Q1.5_County	Q11.2	answers	percentage
Yei	No	126	0.31
Yei	Yes	284	0.69
Wau	No	108	0.27
Wau	Prefer not to answer	3	0.01
Wau	Yes	291	0.72
Rubkona	No	98	0.24
Rubkona	Yes	302	0.76
Pibor	No	252	0.62
Pibor	Yes	155	0.38
Morobo	No	75	0.19
Morobo	Yes	329	0.81
Malakal	No	68	0.16
Malakal	Yes	353	0.84
Lainya	No	149	0.36
Lainya	Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Lainya	Yes	264	0.64
Kajo-keji	No	58	0.15
Kajo-keji	Prefer not to answer	3	0.01
Kajo-keji	Yes	337	0.85
Bor South	No	157	0.37
Bor South	Prefer not to answer	4	0.01
Bor South	Yes	268	0.62

Q11.3 Reasons why water is not available to everyone?

Entire sample

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
NA	2594	0.70
Distance	449	0.12
Not enough water	263	0.07
Quality of water	141	0.04
Non-functioning infrastructure	124	0.03
Insecurity	103	0.03
Other: (please specify)	8	0.00
Prefer not to answer	3	0.00

By county

Q1.5_County	Q11.3	answers	percentage
Yei	Distance	59	0.14
Yei	Insecurity	5	0.01
Yei	Non-functioning infrastructure	8	0.02
Yei	Not enough water	29	0.07
Yei	Quality of water	25	0.06
Yei	NA	284	0.69
Wau	Distance	24	0.06
Wau	Insecurity	3	0.01
Wau	Non-functioning infrastructure	21	0.05
Wau	Not enough water	51	0.13
Wau	Other: (please specify)	1	0.00
Wau	Quality of water	8	0.02
Wau	NA	294	0.73
Rubkona	Distance	20	0.05
Rubkona	Insecurity	2	0.00
Rubkona	Non-functioning infrastructure	31	0.08
Rubkona	Not enough water	24	0.06
Rubkona	Other: (please specify)	3	0.01
Rubkona	Quality of water	18	0.04
Rubkona	NA	302	0.76
Pibor	Distance	85	0.21
Pibor	Insecurity	40	0.10
Pibor	Non-functioning infrastructure	35	0.09
Pibor	Not enough water	63	0.15
Pibor	Other: (please specify)	2	0.00
Pibor	Quality of water	27	0.07
Pibor	NA	155	0.38
Morobo	Distance	49	0.12
Morobo	Non-functioning infrastructure	4	0.01
Morobo	Not enough water	7	0.02
Morobo	Other: (please specify)	1	0.00
Morobo	Quality of water	14	0.03
Morobo	NA	329	0.81
Malakal	Distance	40	0.10
Malakal	Insecurity	3	0.01
Malakal	Non-functioning infrastructure	1	0.00
Malakal	Not enough water	15	0.04
Malakal	Other: (please specify)	1	0.00
Malakal	Quality of water	8	0.02
Malakal	NA	353	0.84
Lainya	Distance	65	0.16
Lainya	Insecurity	33	0.08
Lainya	Non-functioning infrastructure	9	0.02
Lainya	Not enough water	16	0.04
Lainya	Prefer not to answer	2	0.00
Lainya	Quality of water	24	0.06
Lainya	NA	265	0.64
Kajo-keji	Distance	13	0.03
Kajo-keji	Insecurity	8	0.02
Kajo-keji	Non-functioning infrastructure	1	0.00
Kajo-keji	Not enough water	24	0.06
Kajo-keji	Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Kajo-keji	Quality of water	11	0.03
Kajo-keji	NA	340	0.85
Bor South	Distance	94	0.22
Bor South	Insecurity	9	0.02
Bor South	Non-functioning infrastructure	14	0.03
Bor South	Not enough water	34	0.08
Bor South	Quality of water	6	0.01
Bor South	NA	272	0.63

Q11.4 Is the water most people in your community drink safe for human consumption?

Entire sample

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
Yes	2058	0.56
No	1612	0.44
Prefer not to answer	15	0.00

By county

Q1.5_County	Q11.4	answers	percentage
Yei	No	246	0.60
Yei	Yes	164	0.40
Wau	No	108	0.27
Wau	Prefer not to answer	6	0.01
Wau	Yes	288	0.72
Rubkona	No	184	0.46
Rubkona	Yes	216	0.54
Pibor	No	237	0.58
Pibor	Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Pibor	Yes	169	0.42
Morobo	No	275	0.68
Morobo	Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Morobo	Yes	128	0.32
Malakal	No	136	0.32
Malakal	Yes	285	0.68
Lainya	No	189	0.46
Lainya	Prefer not to answer	2	0.00
Lainya	Yes	223	0.54
Kajo-keji	No	54	0.14
Kajo-keji	Prefer not to answer	3	0.01
Kajo-keji	Yes	341	0.86
Bor South	No	183	0.43
Bor South	Prefer not to answer	2	0.00
Bor South	Yes	244	0.57

5) Economic Fragility

All the answers are on a scale of 0-1, i.e. can have the following values: 0, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1. The higher, the more fragile.

The higher, the more fragile.

Index Questions

Q2.3 What is the highest level of schooling you have completed?

Entire sample

mean
0.82

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
No formal schooling	1762	0.48
Primary school	1352	0.37
Secondary school	449	0.12
Vocational courses only	65	0.02
University	53	0.01
-2. Prefer not to answer	4	0.00

By county

County	Mean Response (0 to 1)
Bor South	0.85
Kajo-keji	0.79
Lainya	0.80
Malakal	0.81
Morobo	0.77
Pibor	0.92
Rubkona	0.93
Wau	0.73
Yei	0.78

Q1.5_County	Q2.3_raw	answers	percentage
Yei	No formal schooling	120	0.29
Yei	Primary school	224	0.55
Yei	Secondary school	60	0.15
Yei	Vocational courses only	4	0.01
Yei	University	2	0.00
Wau	No formal schooling	127	0.32
Wau	Primary school	159	0.40
Wau	Secondary school	91	0.23
Wau	Vocational courses only	7	0.02
Wau	University	18	0.04
Rubkona	No formal schooling	330	0.82
Rubkona	Primary school	44	0.11
Rubkona	Secondary school	17	0.04
Rubkona	Vocational courses only	5	0.01
Rubkona	University	4	0.01
Pibor	No formal schooling	305	0.75
Pibor	Primary school	82	0.20
Pibor	Secondary school	14	0.03
Pibor	Vocational courses only	6	0.01
Morobo	No formal schooling	76	0.19
Morobo	Primary school	283	0.70
Morobo	Secondary school	41	0.10
Morobo	Vocational courses only	4	0.01
Malakal	No formal schooling	218	0.52
Malakal	Primary school	119	0.28
Malakal	Secondary school	66	0.16
Malakal	Vocational courses only	1	0.00
Malakal	University	17	0.04
Lainya	-2. Prefer not to answer	2	0.00
Lainya	No formal schooling	163	0.39
Lainya	Primary school	187	0.45
Lainya	Secondary school	47	0.11
Lainya	Vocational courses only	12	0.03
Lainya	University	3	0.01
Kajo-keji	No formal schooling	148	0.37
Kajo-keji	Primary school	180	0.45
Kajo-keji	Secondary school	56	0.14
Kajo-keji	Vocational courses only	12	0.03
Kajo-keji	University	2	0.01
Bor South	-2. Prefer not to answer	2	0.00
Bor South	No formal schooling	275	0.64
Bor South	Primary school	74	0.17
Bor South	Secondary school	57	0.13
Bor South	Vocational courses only	14	0.03
Bor South	University	7	0.02

Q5.6: From 1 to 5, where 1 is “very dissatisfied” and 5 is “very satisfied,” how satisfied are you with your household’s financial situation?

Entire sample

mean
0.36

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
Dissatisfied	1482	0.40
Very dissatisfied	1175	0.32
Satisfied	506	0.14
Neither dissatisfied nor satisfied	420	0.11
Very satisfied	90	0.02
_2. Prefer not to answer	12	0.00

By county

County	Mean Response (0 to 1)
Bor South	0.68
Kajo-keji	0.80
Lainya	0.75
Malakal	0.59
Morobo	0.69
Pibor	0.78
Rubkona	0.80
Wau	0.64
Yei	0.72

Q1.5_County	Q5.6_raw	answers	percentage
Yei	Very dissatisfied	72	0.18
Yei	Dissatisfied	244	0.60
Yei	Neither dissatisfied nor satisfied	58	0.14
Yei	Satisfied	34	0.08
Yei	_2. Prefer not to answer	2	0.00
Wau	Very dissatisfied	103	0.26
Wau	Dissatisfied	137	0.34
Wau	Neither dissatisfied nor satisfied	59	0.15
Wau	Satisfied	83	0.21
Wau	Very satisfied	16	0.04
Wau	_2. Prefer not to answer	4	0.01
Rubkona	Very dissatisfied	207	0.52
Rubkona	Dissatisfied	124	0.31
Rubkona	Neither dissatisfied nor satisfied	25	0.06
Rubkona	Satisfied	19	0.05
Rubkona	Very satisfied	24	0.06
Rubkona	_2. Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Pibor	Very dissatisfied	136	0.33
Pibor	Dissatisfied	210	0.52
Pibor	Neither dissatisfied nor satisfied	39	0.10
Pibor	Satisfied	20	0.05
Pibor	Very satisfied	2	0.00
Morobo	Very dissatisfied	112	0.28
Morobo	Dissatisfied	180	0.45
Morobo	Neither dissatisfied nor satisfied	24	0.06
Morobo	Satisfied	77	0.19
Morobo	Very satisfied	11	0.03
Malakal	Very dissatisfied	74	0.18
Malakal	Dissatisfied	151	0.36
Malakal	Neither dissatisfied nor satisfied	52	0.12
Malakal	Satisfied	136	0.32
Malakal	Very satisfied	8	0.02
Lainya	Very dissatisfied	185	0.45
Lainya	Dissatisfied	103	0.25
Lainya	Neither dissatisfied nor satisfied	56	0.14
Lainya	Satisfied	59	0.14
Lainya	Very satisfied	6	0.01
Lainya	_2. Prefer not to answer	5	0.01
Kajo-keji	Very dissatisfied	173	0.43
Kajo-keji	Dissatisfied	177	0.44
Kajo-keji	Neither dissatisfied nor satisfied	9	0.02
Kajo-keji	Satisfied	32	0.08
Kajo-keji	Very satisfied	7	0.02
Bor South	Very dissatisfied	113	0.26
Bor South	Dissatisfied	156	0.36
Bor South	Neither dissatisfied nor satisfied	98	0.23
Bor South	Satisfied	46	0.11
Bor South	Very satisfied	16	0.04

Q5.7: On a scale from 1 to 5, where 1 is “very difficult” and 5 is “very easy,” how easy would it be for your family to pay a bride price currently?

Entire sample

mean
0.8

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
Very difficult	1591	0.43
Difficult	1518	0.41
Neither difficult nor easy	336	0.09
Easy	174	0.05
Very easy	45	0.01
_2. Prefer not to answer	21	0.01

By county

County	Mean Response (0 to 1)
Bor South	0.78
Kajo-keji	0.90
Lainya	0.85
Malakal	0.76
Morobo	0.82
Pibor	0.78
Rubkona	0.90
Wau	0.69
Yei	0.75

Q1.5_County	Q5.7_raw	answers	percentage
Yei	Very difficult	83	0.20
Yei	Difficult	258	0.63
Yei	Neither difficult nor easy	49	0.12
Yei	Easy	17	0.04
Yei	Very easy	2	0.00
Yei	_2. Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Wau	Very difficult	127	0.32
Wau	Difficult	127	0.32
Wau	Neither difficult nor easy	60	0.15
Wau	Easy	53	0.13
Wau	Very easy	20	0.05
Wau	_2. Prefer not to answer	15	0.04
Rubkona	Very difficult	286	0.72
Rubkona	Difficult	91	0.23
Rubkona	Neither difficult nor easy	8	0.02
Rubkona	Easy	12	0.03
Rubkona	Very easy	3	0.01
Pibor	Very difficult	140	0.34
Pibor	Difficult	205	0.50
Pibor	Neither difficult nor easy	36	0.09
Pibor	Easy	19	0.05
Pibor	Very easy	5	0.01
Pibor	_2. Prefer not to answer	2	0.00
Morobo	Very difficult	178	0.44
Morobo	Difficult	179	0.44
Morobo	Neither difficult nor easy	30	0.07
Morobo	Easy	13	0.03
Morobo	Very easy	4	0.01
Malakal	Very difficult	92	0.22
Malakal	Difficult	275	0.65
Malakal	Neither difficult nor easy	27	0.06
Malakal	Easy	23	0.05
Malakal	Very easy	3	0.01
Malakal	_2. Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Lainya	Very difficult	236	0.57
Lainya	Difficult	137	0.33
Lainya	Neither difficult nor easy	21	0.05
Lainya	Easy	16	0.04
Lainya	Very easy	4	0.01
Kajo-keji	Very difficult	270	0.68
Kajo-keji	Difficult	106	0.27
Kajo-keji	Neither difficult nor easy	16	0.04
Kajo-keji	Easy	2	0.01
Kajo-keji	Very easy	3	0.01
Kajo-keji	_2. Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Bor South	Very difficult	179	0.42
Bor South	Difficult	140	0.33
Bor South	Neither difficult nor easy	89	0.21
Bor South	Easy	19	0.04
Bor South	Very easy	1	0.00
Bor South	_2. Prefer not to answer	1	0.00

Q5.9: How severe would you say the impact of an unexpected death would be on your household’s economic situation?

Entire sample

mean
0.65

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
Severe	1133	0.31
Extremely severe	953	0.26
Somewhat severe	915	0.25
Not severe	458	0.12
Not severe at all (no impact)	206	0.06
_2. Prefer not to answer	20	0.01

By county

County	Mean Response (0 to 1)
Bor South	0.64
Kajo-keji	0.63
Lainya	0.65
Malakal	0.53
Morobo	0.64
Pibor	0.65
Rubkona	0.83
Wau	0.61
Yei	0.65

Q1.5_County	Q5.9_raw	answers	percentage
Yei	Not severe at all (no impact)	5	0.01
Yei	Not severe	27	0.07
Yei	Somewhat severe	124	0.30
Yei	Severe	220	0.54
Yei	Extremely severe	34	0.08
Wau	Not severe at all (no impact)	32	0.08
Wau	Not severe	32	0.08
Wau	Somewhat severe	129	0.32
Wau	Severe	138	0.34
Wau	Extremely severe	68	0.17
Wau	_2. Prefer not to answer	3	0.01
Rubkona	Not severe at all (no impact)	2	0.00
Rubkona	Not severe	18	0.04
Rubkona	Somewhat severe	55	0.14
Rubkona	Severe	92	0.23
Rubkona	Extremely severe	231	0.58
Rubkona	_2. Prefer not to answer	2	0.00
Pibor	Not severe at all (no impact)	22	0.05
Pibor	Not severe	44	0.11
Pibor	Somewhat severe	95	0.23
Pibor	Severe	165	0.41
Pibor	Extremely severe	80	0.20
Pibor	_2. Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Morobo	Not severe at all (no impact)	29	0.07
Morobo	Not severe	82	0.20
Morobo	Somewhat severe	64	0.16
Morobo	Severe	83	0.21
Morobo	Extremely severe	145	0.36
Morobo	_2. Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Malakal	Not severe at all (no impact)	4	0.01
Malakal	Not severe	49	0.12
Malakal	Somewhat severe	261	0.62
Malakal	Severe	104	0.25
Malakal	Extremely severe	3	0.01
Lainya	Not severe at all (no impact)	65	0.16
Lainya	Not severe	43	0.10
Lainya	Somewhat severe	24	0.06
Lainya	Severe	138	0.33
Lainya	Extremely severe	142	0.34
Lainya	_2. Prefer not to answer	2	0.00
Kajo-keji	Not severe at all (no impact)	37	0.09
Kajo-keji	Not severe	47	0.12
Kajo-keji	Somewhat severe	91	0.23
Kajo-keji	Severe	108	0.27
Kajo-keji	Extremely severe	104	0.26
Kajo-keji	_2. Prefer not to answer	11	0.03
Bor South	Not severe at all (no impact)	10	0.02
Bor South	Not severe	116	0.27
Bor South	Somewhat severe	72	0.17
Bor South	Severe	85	0.20
Bor South	Extremely severe	146	0.34

Q5.22: To what extent is your household dependent on monetary or other forms of aid from NGOs, the UN, or the government?

Entire sample

mean
0.23

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
No dependency	1494	0.41
Low dependency	1351	0.37
Moderate dependency	556	0.15
High dependency	208	0.06
Full dependency	65	0.02
_2. Prefer not to answer	11	0.00

By county

County	Mean Response (0 to 1)
Bor South	0.21
Kajo-keji	0.26
Lainya	0.22
Malakal	0.19
Morobo	0.21
Pibor	0.28
Rubkona	0.31
Wau	0.14
Yei	0.23

Q1.5_County	Q5.22_raw	answers	percentage
Yei	No dependency	162	0.40
Yei	Low dependency	127	0.31
Yei	Moderate dependency	109	0.27
Yei	High dependency	12	0.03
Wau	No dependency	238	0.59
Wau	Low dependency	109	0.27
Wau	Moderate dependency	35	0.09
Wau	High dependency	14	0.03
Wau	Full dependency	2	0.00
Wau	_2. Prefer not to answer	4	0.01
Rubkona	No dependency	92	0.23
Rubkona	Low dependency	192	0.48
Rubkona	Moderate dependency	55	0.14
Rubkona	High dependency	45	0.11
Rubkona	Full dependency	14	0.04
Rubkona	_2. Prefer not to answer	2	0.00
Pibor	No dependency	143	0.35
Pibor	Low dependency	138	0.34
Pibor	Moderate dependency	72	0.18
Pibor	High dependency	49	0.12
Pibor	Full dependency	5	0.01
Morobo	No dependency	222	0.55
Morobo	Low dependency	81	0.20
Morobo	Moderate dependency	53	0.13
Morobo	High dependency	29	0.07
Morobo	Full dependency	18	0.04
Morobo	_2. Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Malakal	No dependency	195	0.46
Malakal	Low dependency	158	0.38
Malakal	Moderate dependency	49	0.12
Malakal	High dependency	12	0.03
Malakal	Full dependency	7	0.02
Lainya	No dependency	169	0.41
Lainya	Low dependency	165	0.40
Lainya	Moderate dependency	46	0.11
Lainya	High dependency	23	0.06
Lainya	Full dependency	10	0.02
Lainya	_2. Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Kajo-keji	No dependency	136	0.34
Kajo-keji	Low dependency	136	0.34
Kajo-keji	Moderate dependency	103	0.26
Kajo-keji	High dependency	13	0.03
Kajo-keji	Full dependency	7	0.02
Kajo-keji	_2. Prefer not to answer	3	0.01
Bor South	No dependency	137	0.32
Bor South	Low dependency	245	0.57
Bor South	Moderate dependency	34	0.08
Bor South	High dependency	11	0.03
Bor South	Full dependency	2	0.00

Additional Questions

Q5.1 Main source of income?

Entire sample

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
Agriculture	1892	0.51
Casual labor	440	0.12
Owning a business	432	0.12
Working for a business	204	0.06
Livestock rearing	158	0.04
Alcohol (local) brewing	119	0.03
Forestry	112	0.03
Support from family within the country	95	0.03
UN/NGO support	92	0.02
Other, specify	54	0.01
-2. Prefer not to answer	39	0.01
Harvest and sale of forest products	29	0.01
Support or remittances from family abroad (outside of South Sudan)	19	0.01

By county

Q1.5_County	Q5.1	answers	percentage
Yei	-2. Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Yei	Owning a business	30	0.07
Yei	Support or remittances from family abroad (outside of South Sudan)	5	0.01
Yei	UN/NGO support	2	0.00
Yei	Working for a business	9	0.02
Yei	Casual labor	28	0.07
Yei	Agriculture	309	0.75
Yei	Livestock rearing	5	0.01
Yei	Alcohol (local) brewing	11	0.03
Yei	Harvest and sale of forest products	3	0.01
Yei	Support from family within the country	7	0.02
Wau	-2. Prefer not to answer	2	0.00
Wau	Owning a business	68	0.17
Wau	Support or remittances from family abroad (outside of South Sudan)	4	0.01
Wau	UN/NGO support	2	0.00
Wau	Other, specify	4	0.01
Wau	Working for a business	45	0.11
Wau	Casual labor	107	0.27
Wau	Agriculture	141	0.35
Wau	Livestock rearing	1	0.00
Wau	Alcohol (local) brewing	8	0.02
Wau	Harvest and sale of forest products	5	0.01
Wau	Support from family within the country	15	0.04
Rubkona	-2. Prefer not to answer	29	0.07
Rubkona	Owning a business	73	0.18
Rubkona	Support or remittances from family abroad (outside of South Sudan)	1	0.00
Rubkona	UN/NGO support	70	0.17
Rubkona	Other, specify	10	0.03
Rubkona	Working for a business	17	0.04
Rubkona	Casual labor	17	0.04
Rubkona	Agriculture	68	0.17
Rubkona	Forestry	4	0.01
Rubkona	Livestock rearing	69	0.17
Rubkona	Alcohol (local) brewing	26	0.06
Rubkona	Harvest and sale of forest products	5	0.01
Rubkona	Support from family within the country	11	0.03
Pibor	Owning a business	30	0.07
Pibor	Support or remittances from family abroad (outside of South Sudan)	4	0.01
Pibor	UN/NGO support	6	0.01
Pibor	Other, specify	28	0.07
Pibor	Working for a business	19	0.05
Pibor	Casual labor	40	0.10
Pibor	Agriculture	138	0.34
Pibor	Forestry	64	0.16
Pibor	Livestock rearing	49	0.12
Pibor	Alcohol (local) brewing	16	0.04
Pibor	Harvest and sale of forest products	9	0.02
Pibor	Support from family within the country	4	0.01
Morobo	Owning a business	14	0.03
Morobo	Other, specify	5	0.01
Morobo	Working for a business	9	0.02
Morobo	Casual labor	31	0.08
Morobo	Agriculture	332	0.82
Morobo	Forestry	6	0.01
Morobo	Livestock rearing	2	0.00
Morobo	Alcohol (local) brewing	3	0.01
Morobo	Harvest and sale of forest products	1	0.00
Morobo	Support from family within the country	1	0.00
Malakal	-2. Prefer not to answer	5	0.01
Malakal	Owning a business	135	0.32
Malakal	UN/NGO support	3	0.01
Malakal	Other, specify	5	0.01
Malakal	Working for a business	67	0.16
Malakal	Casual labor	35	0.08
Malakal	Agriculture	75	0.18
Malakal	Forestry	20	0.05
Malakal	Livestock rearing	4	0.01
Malakal	Alcohol (local) brewing	24	0.06
Malakal	Support from family within the country	48	0.11
Lainya	Owning a business	26	0.06
Lainya	Support or remittances from family abroad (outside of South Sudan)	1	0.00
Lainya	UN/NGO support	1	0.00
Lainya	Working for a business	7	0.02
Lainya	Casual labor	40	0.10
Lainya	Agriculture	303	0.73
Lainya	Forestry	12	0.03
Lainya	Livestock rearing	6	0.01
Lainya	Alcohol (local) brewing	15	0.04
Lainya	Harvest and sale of forest products	2	0.00
Lainya	Support from family within the country	1	0.00
Kajo-keji	-2. Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Kajo-keji	Owning a business	5	0.01
Kajo-keji	Casual labor	100	0.25
Kajo-keji	Agriculture	270	0.68
Kajo-keji	Forestry	2	0.01
Kajo-keji	Livestock rearing	3	0.01
Kajo-keji	Alcohol (local) brewing	12	0.03
Kajo-keji	Harvest and sale of forest products	3	0.01
Kajo-keji	Support from family within the country	2	0.01
Bor South	-2. Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Bor South	Owning a business	51	0.12
Bor South	Support or remittances from family abroad (outside of South Sudan)	4	0.01
Bor South	UN/NGO support	8	0.02
Bor South	Other, specify	2	0.00
Bor South	Working for a business	31	0.07
Bor South	Casual labor	42	0.10
Bor South	Agriculture	256	0.60
Bor South	Forestry	4	0.01
Bor South	Livestock rearing	19	0.04
Bor South	Alcohol (local) brewing	4	0.01
Bor South	Harvest and sale of forest products	1	0.00
Bor South	Support from family within the country	6	0.01

Q5.11 Does your household practice farming?

Entire sample

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
Yes	2789	0.76
No	888	0.24
Prefer not to answer	8	0.00

By county

Q1.5_County	Q5.11	answers	percentage
Yei	No	42	0.10
Yei	Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Yei	Yes	367	0.90
Wau	No	132	0.33
Wau	Yes	270	0.67
Rubkona	No	145	0.36
Rubkona	Yes	255	0.64
Pibor	No	137	0.34
Pibor	Prefer not to answer	3	0.01
Pibor	Yes	267	0.66
Morobo	No	33	0.08
Morobo	Yes	371	0.92
Malakal	No	235	0.56
Malakal	Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Malakal	Yes	185	0.44
Lainya	No	40	0.10
Lainya	Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Lainya	Yes	373	0.90
Kajo-keji	No	29	0.07
Kajo-keji	Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Kajo-keji	Yes	368	0.92
Bor South	No	95	0.22
Bor South	Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Bor South	Yes	333	0.78

Q5.16 I’m going to list several challenges to producing food crops. Please tell me whether each poses no challenge, a small challenge, or a large challenge to your household’s ability to produce food crops.

Q5.16.1 Crop disease/pests

Entire sample

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
Large Challenge	1461	0.40
Small Challenge	1108	0.30
NA	896	0.24
No challenge	207	0.06
Prefer Not to Answer	13	0.00

By county

Q1.5_County	Q5.16.1	answers	percentage
Yei	Large Challenge	100	0.24
Yei	No challenge	22	0.05
Yei	Small Challenge	245	0.60
Yei	NA	43	0.10
Wau	Large Challenge	90	0.22
Wau	No challenge	46	0.11
Wau	Prefer Not to Answer	1	0.00
Wau	Small Challenge	133	0.33
Wau	NA	132	0.33
Rubkona	Large Challenge	204	0.51
Rubkona	No challenge	4	0.01
Rubkona	Small Challenge	47	0.12
Rubkona	NA	145	0.36
Pibor	Large Challenge	130	0.32
Pibor	No challenge	17	0.04
Pibor	Prefer Not to Answer	3	0.01
Pibor	Small Challenge	117	0.29
Pibor	NA	140	0.34
Morobo	Large Challenge	264	0.65
Morobo	No challenge	14	0.03
Morobo	Prefer Not to Answer	1	0.00
Morobo	Small Challenge	92	0.23
Morobo	NA	33	0.08
Malakal	Large Challenge	106	0.25
Malakal	No challenge	14	0.03
Malakal	Small Challenge	65	0.15
Malakal	NA	236	0.56
Lainya	Large Challenge	165	0.40
Lainya	No challenge	35	0.08
Lainya	Prefer Not to Answer	3	0.01
Lainya	Small Challenge	170	0.41
Lainya	NA	41	0.10
Kajo-keji	Large Challenge	153	0.38
Kajo-keji	No challenge	31	0.08
Kajo-keji	Prefer Not to Answer	5	0.01
Kajo-keji	Small Challenge	179	0.45
Kajo-keji	NA	30	0.08
Bor South	Large Challenge	249	0.58
Bor South	No challenge	24	0.06
Bor South	Small Challenge	60	0.14
Bor South	NA	96	0.22

Q5.16.2 Conflict

Entire sample

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
Large Challenge	1357	0.37
NA	896	0.24
Small Challenge	790	0.21
No challenge	627	0.17
Prefer Not to Answer	15	0.00

By county

Q1.5_County	Q5.16.2	answers	percentage
Yei	Large Challenge	93	0.23
Yei	No challenge	138	0.34
Yei	Small Challenge	136	0.33
Yei	NA	43	0.10
Wau	Large Challenge	115	0.29
Wau	No challenge	60	0.15
Wau	Prefer Not to Answer	1	0.00
Wau	Small Challenge	94	0.23
Wau	NA	132	0.33
Rubkona	Large Challenge	155	0.39
Rubkona	No challenge	52	0.13
Rubkona	Small Challenge	48	0.12
Rubkona	NA	145	0.36
Pibor	Large Challenge	140	0.34
Pibor	No challenge	34	0.08
Pibor	Prefer Not to Answer	4	0.01
Pibor	Small Challenge	89	0.22
Pibor	NA	140	0.34
Morobo	Large Challenge	174	0.43
Morobo	No challenge	112	0.28
Morobo	Small Challenge	85	0.21
Morobo	NA	33	0.08
Malakal	Large Challenge	92	0.22
Malakal	No challenge	55	0.13
Malakal	Small Challenge	38	0.09
Malakal	NA	236	0.56
Lainya	Large Challenge	230	0.56
Lainya	No challenge	41	0.10
Lainya	Prefer Not to Answer	4	0.01
Lainya	Small Challenge	98	0.24
Lainya	NA	41	0.10
Kajo-keji	Large Challenge	189	0.47
Kajo-keji	No challenge	52	0.13
Kajo-keji	Prefer Not to Answer	6	0.02
Kajo-keji	Small Challenge	121	0.30
Kajo-keji	NA	30	0.08
Bor South	Large Challenge	169	0.39
Bor South	No challenge	83	0.19
Bor South	Small Challenge	81	0.19
Bor South	NA	96	0.22

Q5.16.3 Droughts

Entire sample

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
No challenge	978	0.27
Small Challenge	964	0.26
NA	896	0.24
Large Challenge	832	0.23
Prefer Not to Answer	15	0.00

By county

Q1.5_County	Q5.16.3	answers	percentage
Yei	Large Challenge	41	0.10
Yei	No challenge	211	0.51
Yei	Small Challenge	115	0.28
Yei	NA	43	0.10
Wau	Large Challenge	82	0.20
Wau	No challenge	95	0.24
Wau	Small Challenge	93	0.23
Wau	NA	132	0.33
Rubkona	Large Challenge	119	0.30
Rubkona	No challenge	94	0.23
Rubkona	Small Challenge	42	0.10
Rubkona	NA	145	0.36
Pibor	Large Challenge	142	0.35
Pibor	No challenge	23	0.06
Pibor	Prefer Not to Answer	4	0.01
Pibor	Small Challenge	98	0.24
Pibor	NA	140	0.34
Morobo	Large Challenge	124	0.31
Morobo	No challenge	127	0.31
Morobo	Small Challenge	120	0.30
Morobo	NA	33	0.08
Malakal	Large Challenge	58	0.14
Malakal	No challenge	79	0.19
Malakal	Prefer Not to Answer	1	0.00
Malakal	Small Challenge	47	0.11
Malakal	NA	236	0.56
Lainya	Large Challenge	93	0.22
Lainya	No challenge	155	0.37
Lainya	Prefer Not to Answer	5	0.01
Lainya	Small Challenge	120	0.29
Lainya	NA	41	0.10
Kajo-keji	Large Challenge	102	0.26
Kajo-keji	No challenge	92	0.23
Kajo-keji	Prefer Not to Answer	5	0.01
Kajo-keji	Small Challenge	169	0.42
Kajo-keji	NA	30	0.08
Bor South	Large Challenge	71	0.17
Bor South	No challenge	102	0.24
Bor South	Small Challenge	160	0.37
Bor South	NA	96	0.22

Q5.16.4 Floods

Entire sample

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
No challenge	1097	0.30
Large Challenge	1012	0.27
NA	896	0.24
Small Challenge	667	0.18
Prefer Not to Answer	13	0.00

By county

Q1.5_County	Q5.16.4	answers	percentage
Yei	Large Challenge	24	0.06
Yei	No challenge	291	0.71
Yei	Small Challenge	52	0.13
Yei	NA	43	0.10
Wau	Large Challenge	48	0.12
Wau	No challenge	138	0.34
Wau	Prefer Not to Answer	1	0.00
Wau	Small Challenge	83	0.21
Wau	NA	132	0.33
Rubkona	Large Challenge	227	0.57
Rubkona	Small Challenge	28	0.07
Rubkona	NA	145	0.36
Pibor	Large Challenge	95	0.23
Pibor	No challenge	34	0.08
Pibor	Prefer Not to Answer	4	0.01
Pibor	Small Challenge	134	0.33
Pibor	NA	140	0.34
Morobo	Large Challenge	59	0.15
Morobo	No challenge	234	0.58
Morobo	Small Challenge	78	0.19
Morobo	NA	33	0.08
Malakal	Large Challenge	126	0.30
Malakal	No challenge	16	0.04
Malakal	Small Challenge	43	0.10
Malakal	NA	236	0.56
Lainya	Large Challenge	63	0.15
Lainya	No challenge	226	0.55
Lainya	Prefer Not to Answer	3	0.01
Lainya	Small Challenge	81	0.20
Lainya	NA	41	0.10
Kajo-keji	Large Challenge	68	0.17
Kajo-keji	No challenge	150	0.38
Kajo-keji	Prefer Not to Answer	5	0.01
Kajo-keji	Small Challenge	145	0.36
Kajo-keji	NA	30	0.08
Bor South	Large Challenge	302	0.70
Bor South	No challenge	8	0.02
Bor South	Small Challenge	23	0.05
Bor South	NA	96	0.22

Q5.16.6 Changes in temperature

Entire sample

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
Small Challenge	1368	0.37
Large Challenge	954	0.26
NA	896	0.24
No challenge	453	0.12
Prefer Not to Answer	14	0.00

By county

Q1.5_County	Q5.16.6	answers	percentage
Yei	Large Challenge	107	0.26
Yei	No challenge	44	0.11
Yei	Small Challenge	216	0.53
Yei	NA	43	0.10
Wau	Large Challenge	99	0.25
Wau	No challenge	38	0.09
Wau	Small Challenge	133	0.33
Wau	NA	132	0.33
Rubkona	Large Challenge	178	0.44
Rubkona	No challenge	2	0.00
Rubkona	Prefer Not to Answer	1	0.00
Rubkona	Small Challenge	74	0.18
Rubkona	NA	145	0.36
Pibor	Large Challenge	90	0.22
Pibor	No challenge	54	0.13
Pibor	Prefer Not to Answer	3	0.01
Pibor	Small Challenge	120	0.29
Pibor	NA	140	0.34
Morobo	Large Challenge	111	0.27
Morobo	No challenge	69	0.17
Morobo	Small Challenge	191	0.47
Morobo	NA	33	0.08
Malakal	Large Challenge	48	0.11
Malakal	No challenge	77	0.18
Malakal	Small Challenge	60	0.14
Malakal	NA	236	0.56
Lainya	Large Challenge	105	0.25
Lainya	No challenge	96	0.23
Lainya	Prefer Not to Answer	3	0.01
Lainya	Small Challenge	169	0.41
Lainya	NA	41	0.10
Kajo-keji	Large Challenge	117	0.29
Kajo-keji	No challenge	61	0.15
Kajo-keji	Prefer Not to Answer	7	0.02
Kajo-keji	Small Challenge	183	0.46
Kajo-keji	NA	30	0.08
Bor South	Large Challenge	99	0.23
Bor South	No challenge	12	0.03
Bor South	Small Challenge	222	0.52
Bor South	NA	96	0.22

Q5.16.7 Selling for a fair price

Entire sample

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
Small Challenge	1264	0.34
Large Challenge	1055	0.29
NA	896	0.24
No challenge	453	0.12
Prefer Not to Answer	17	0.00

By county

Q1.5_County	Q5.16.7	answers	percentage
Yei	Large Challenge	101	0.25
Yei	No challenge	50	0.12
Yei	Prefer Not to Answer	1	0.00
Yei	Small Challenge	215	0.52
Yei	NA	43	0.10
Wau	Large Challenge	80	0.20
Wau	No challenge	72	0.18
Wau	Prefer Not to Answer	1	0.00
Wau	Small Challenge	117	0.29
Wau	NA	132	0.33
Rubkona	Large Challenge	121	0.30
Rubkona	No challenge	18	0.04
Rubkona	Small Challenge	116	0.29
Rubkona	NA	145	0.36
Pibor	Large Challenge	54	0.13
Pibor	No challenge	97	0.24
Pibor	Prefer Not to Answer	4	0.01
Pibor	Small Challenge	112	0.28
Pibor	NA	140	0.34
Morobo	Large Challenge	217	0.54
Morobo	No challenge	26	0.06
Morobo	Small Challenge	128	0.32
Morobo	NA	33	0.08
Malakal	Large Challenge	59	0.14
Malakal	No challenge	43	0.10
Malakal	Small Challenge	83	0.20
Malakal	NA	236	0.56
Lainya	Large Challenge	153	0.37
Lainya	No challenge	76	0.18
Lainya	Prefer Not to Answer	3	0.01
Lainya	Small Challenge	141	0.34
Lainya	NA	41	0.10
Kajo-keji	Large Challenge	194	0.49
Kajo-keji	No challenge	27	0.07
Kajo-keji	Prefer Not to Answer	7	0.02
Kajo-keji	Small Challenge	140	0.35
Kajo-keji	NA	30	0.08
Bor South	Large Challenge	76	0.18
Bor South	No challenge	44	0.10
Bor South	Prefer Not to Answer	1	0.00
Bor South	Small Challenge	212	0.49
Bor South	NA	96	0.22

Q5.16.8 Destruction of farm crops by cattle or herders

Entire sample

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
Large Challenge	1187	0.32
Small Challenge	1070	0.29
NA	896	0.24
No challenge	516	0.14
Prefer Not to Answer	16	0.00

By county

Q1.5_County	Q5.16.8	answers	percentage
Yei	Large Challenge	135	0.33
Yei	No challenge	60	0.15
Yei	Small Challenge	172	0.42
Yei	NA	43	0.10
Wau	Large Challenge	109	0.27
Wau	No challenge	36	0.09
Wau	Prefer Not to Answer	1	0.00
Wau	Small Challenge	124	0.31
Wau	NA	132	0.33
Rubkona	Large Challenge	137	0.34
Rubkona	No challenge	29	0.07
Rubkona	Small Challenge	89	0.22
Rubkona	NA	145	0.36
Pibor	Large Challenge	82	0.20
Pibor	No challenge	71	0.17
Pibor	Prefer Not to Answer	6	0.01
Pibor	Small Challenge	108	0.27
Pibor	NA	140	0.34
Morobo	Large Challenge	134	0.33
Morobo	No challenge	134	0.33
Morobo	Small Challenge	103	0.25
Morobo	NA	33	0.08
Malakal	Large Challenge	46	0.11
Malakal	No challenge	76	0.18
Malakal	Small Challenge	63	0.15
Malakal	NA	236	0.56
Lainya	Large Challenge	266	0.64
Lainya	No challenge	33	0.08
Lainya	Prefer Not to Answer	1	0.00
Lainya	Small Challenge	73	0.18
Lainya	NA	41	0.10
Kajo-keji	Large Challenge	167	0.42
Kajo-keji	No challenge	32	0.08
Kajo-keji	Prefer Not to Answer	7	0.02
Kajo-keji	Small Challenge	162	0.41
Kajo-keji	NA	30	0.08
Bor South	Large Challenge	111	0.26
Bor South	No challenge	45	0.10
Bor South	Prefer Not to Answer	1	0.00
Bor South	Small Challenge	176	0.41
Bor South	NA	96	0.22

Q5.16.9 Erosion

Entire sample

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
No challenge	1109	0.30
Small Challenge	1093	0.30
NA	896	0.24
Large Challenge	569	0.15
Prefer Not to Answer	18	0.00

By county

Q1.5_County	Q5.16.9	answers	percentage
Yei	Large Challenge	17	0.04
Yei	No challenge	222	0.54
Yei	Prefer Not to Answer	1	0.00
Yei	Small Challenge	127	0.31
Yei	NA	43	0.10
Wau	Large Challenge	55	0.14
Wau	No challenge	65	0.16
Wau	Prefer Not to Answer	5	0.01
Wau	Small Challenge	145	0.36
Wau	NA	132	0.33
Rubkona	Large Challenge	119	0.30
Rubkona	No challenge	37	0.09
Rubkona	Prefer Not to Answer	1	0.00
Rubkona	Small Challenge	98	0.24
Rubkona	NA	145	0.36
Pibor	Large Challenge	37	0.09
Pibor	No challenge	108	0.27
Pibor	Prefer Not to Answer	3	0.01
Pibor	Small Challenge	119	0.29
Pibor	NA	140	0.34
Morobo	Large Challenge	65	0.16
Morobo	No challenge	169	0.42
Morobo	Small Challenge	137	0.34
Morobo	NA	33	0.08
Malakal	Large Challenge	50	0.12
Malakal	No challenge	91	0.22
Malakal	Small Challenge	44	0.10
Malakal	NA	236	0.56
Lainya	Large Challenge	83	0.20
Lainya	No challenge	168	0.41
Lainya	Prefer Not to Answer	1	0.00
Lainya	Small Challenge	121	0.29
Lainya	NA	41	0.10
Kajo-keji	Large Challenge	74	0.19
Kajo-keji	No challenge	122	0.31
Kajo-keji	Prefer Not to Answer	7	0.02
Kajo-keji	Small Challenge	165	0.41
Kajo-keji	NA	30	0.08
Bor South	Large Challenge	69	0.16
Bor South	No challenge	127	0.30
Bor South	Small Challenge	137	0.32
Bor South	NA	96	0.22

Q5.16.10 Theft

Entire sample

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
Small Challenge	1171	0.32
No challenge	928	0.25
NA	896	0.24
Large Challenge	678	0.18
Prefer Not to Answer	12	0.00

By county

Q1.5_County	Q5.16.10	answers	percentage
Yei	Large Challenge	43	0.10
Yei	No challenge	210	0.51
Yei	Small Challenge	114	0.28
Yei	NA	43	0.10
Wau	Large Challenge	96	0.24
Wau	No challenge	43	0.11
Wau	Small Challenge	131	0.33
Wau	NA	132	0.33
Rubkona	Large Challenge	118	0.30
Rubkona	No challenge	54	0.14
Rubkona	Prefer Not to Answer	1	0.00
Rubkona	Small Challenge	82	0.20
Rubkona	NA	145	0.36
Pibor	Large Challenge	52	0.13
Pibor	No challenge	100	0.25
Pibor	Prefer Not to Answer	4	0.01
Pibor	Small Challenge	111	0.27
Pibor	NA	140	0.34
Morobo	Large Challenge	92	0.23
Morobo	No challenge	155	0.38
Morobo	Small Challenge	124	0.31
Morobo	NA	33	0.08
Malakal	Large Challenge	63	0.15
Malakal	No challenge	39	0.09
Malakal	Small Challenge	83	0.20
Malakal	NA	236	0.56
Lainya	Large Challenge	93	0.22
Lainya	No challenge	108	0.26
Lainya	Prefer Not to Answer	2	0.00
Lainya	Small Challenge	170	0.41
Lainya	NA	41	0.10
Kajo-keji	Large Challenge	34	0.09
Kajo-keji	No challenge	120	0.30
Kajo-keji	Prefer Not to Answer	5	0.01
Kajo-keji	Small Challenge	209	0.53
Kajo-keji	NA	30	0.08
Bor South	Large Challenge	87	0.20
Bor South	No challenge	99	0.23
Bor South	Small Challenge	147	0.34
Bor South	NA	96	0.22

Q5.16.11 Theft

Entire sample

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
Small Challenge	1251	0.34
Large Challenge	966	0.26
NA	896	0.24
No challenge	562	0.15
Prefer Not to Answer	10	0.00

By county

Q1.5_County	Q5.16.11	answers	percentage
Yei	Large Challenge	47	0.11
Yei	No challenge	117	0.29
Yei	Small Challenge	203	0.50
Yei	NA	43	0.10
Wau	Large Challenge	42	0.10
Wau	No challenge	99	0.25
Wau	Small Challenge	129	0.32
Wau	NA	132	0.33
Rubkona	Large Challenge	154	0.38
Rubkona	No challenge	5	0.01
Rubkona	Small Challenge	96	0.24
Rubkona	NA	145	0.36
Pibor	Large Challenge	83	0.20
Pibor	No challenge	61	0.15
Pibor	Prefer Not to Answer	4	0.01
Pibor	Small Challenge	119	0.29
Pibor	NA	140	0.34
Morobo	Large Challenge	141	0.35
Morobo	No challenge	62	0.15
Morobo	Small Challenge	168	0.42
Morobo	NA	33	0.08
Malakal	Large Challenge	42	0.10
Malakal	No challenge	75	0.18
Malakal	Small Challenge	68	0.16
Malakal	NA	236	0.56
Lainya	Large Challenge	224	0.54
Lainya	No challenge	51	0.12
Lainya	Prefer Not to Answer	1	0.00
Lainya	Small Challenge	97	0.23
Lainya	NA	41	0.10
Kajo-keji	Large Challenge	126	0.32
Kajo-keji	No challenge	60	0.15
Kajo-keji	Prefer Not to Answer	5	0.01
Kajo-keji	Small Challenge	177	0.44
Kajo-keji	NA	30	0.08
Bor South	Large Challenge	107	0.25
Bor South	No challenge	32	0.07
Bor South	Small Challenge	194	0.45
Bor South	NA	96	0.22

Q5.16.12 Storage facilities

Entire sample

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
Small Challenge	1207	0.33
Large Challenge	990	0.27
NA	896	0.24
No challenge	576	0.16
Prefer Not to Answer	16	0.00

By county

Q1.5_County	Q5.16.12	answers	percentage
Yei	Large Challenge	55	0.13
Yei	No challenge	143	0.35
Yei	Small Challenge	169	0.41
Yei	NA	43	0.10
Wau	Large Challenge	51	0.13
Wau	No challenge	90	0.22
Wau	Small Challenge	129	0.32
Wau	NA	132	0.33
Rubkona	Large Challenge	143	0.36
Rubkona	No challenge	4	0.01
Rubkona	Small Challenge	108	0.27
Rubkona	NA	145	0.36
Pibor	Large Challenge	55	0.14
Pibor	No challenge	82	0.20
Pibor	Prefer Not to Answer	5	0.01
Pibor	Small Challenge	125	0.31
Pibor	NA	140	0.34
Morobo	Large Challenge	165	0.41
Morobo	No challenge	60	0.15
Morobo	Small Challenge	146	0.36
Morobo	NA	33	0.08
Malakal	Large Challenge	47	0.11
Malakal	No challenge	55	0.13
Malakal	Small Challenge	83	0.20
Malakal	NA	236	0.56
Lainya	Large Challenge	172	0.42
Lainya	No challenge	62	0.15
Lainya	Prefer Not to Answer	4	0.01
Lainya	Small Challenge	135	0.33
Lainya	NA	41	0.10
Kajo-keji	Large Challenge	145	0.36
Kajo-keji	No challenge	44	0.11
Kajo-keji	Prefer Not to Answer	7	0.02
Kajo-keji	Small Challenge	172	0.43
Kajo-keji	NA	30	0.08
Bor South	Large Challenge	157	0.37
Bor South	No challenge	36	0.08
Bor South	Small Challenge	140	0.33
Bor South	NA	96	0.22

Q5.17 Does your household own any livestock or farm animals?

Entire sample

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
No	2147	0.58
Yes	1528	0.41
Prefer not to answer	10	0.00

By county

Q1.5_County	Q5.17	answers	percentage
Yei	No	154	0.38
Yei	Yes	256	0.62
Wau	No	358	0.89
Wau	Prefer not to answer	2	0.00
Wau	Yes	42	0.10
Rubkona	No	211	0.53
Rubkona	Yes	189	0.47
Pibor	No	244	0.60
Pibor	Yes	163	0.40
Morobo	No	161	0.40
Morobo	Yes	243	0.60
Malakal	No	360	0.86
Malakal	Yes	61	0.14
Lainya	No	232	0.56
Lainya	Yes	182	0.44
Kajo-keji	No	234	0.59
Kajo-keji	Prefer not to answer	3	0.01
Kajo-keji	Yes	161	0.40
Bor South	No	193	0.45
Bor South	Prefer not to answer	5	0.01
Bor South	Yes	231	0.54

Q5.19 Please tell me whether each poses no challenge, a small challenge, or a large challenge to your household’s ability to maintain livestock/farm animals.

Q5.19.1 Inadequate grazing land

Entire sample

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
NA	2157	0.59
No challenge	570	0.15
Small Challenge	567	0.15
Large Challenge	384	0.10
Prefer Not to Answer	7	0.00

By county

Q1.5_County	Q.5.19.1	answers	percentage
Yei	Large Challenge	17	0.04
Yei	No challenge	146	0.36
Yei	Prefer Not to Answer	6	0.01
Yei	Small Challenge	87	0.21
Yei	NA	154	0.38
Wau	Large Challenge	6	0.01
Wau	No challenge	9	0.02
Wau	Small Challenge	27	0.07
Wau	NA	360	0.90
Rubkona	Large Challenge	118	0.30
Rubkona	No challenge	19	0.05
Rubkona	Small Challenge	52	0.13
Rubkona	NA	211	0.53
Pibor	Large Challenge	51	0.13
Pibor	No challenge	28	0.07
Pibor	Small Challenge	84	0.21
Pibor	NA	244	0.60
Morobo	Large Challenge	69	0.17
Morobo	No challenge	113	0.28
Morobo	Small Challenge	61	0.15
Morobo	NA	161	0.40
Malakal	Large Challenge	28	0.07
Malakal	No challenge	9	0.02
Malakal	Small Challenge	24	0.06
Malakal	NA	360	0.86
Lainya	Large Challenge	30	0.07
Lainya	No challenge	43	0.10
Lainya	Small Challenge	109	0.26
Lainya	NA	232	0.56
Kajo-keji	Large Challenge	21	0.05
Kajo-keji	No challenge	84	0.21
Kajo-keji	Small Challenge	56	0.14
Kajo-keji	NA	237	0.60
Bor South	Large Challenge	44	0.10
Bor South	No challenge	119	0.28
Bor South	Prefer Not to Answer	1	0.00
Bor South	Small Challenge	67	0.16
Bor South	NA	198	0.46

Q5.19.2 Livestock disease

Entire sample

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
NA	2157	0.59
Large Challenge	820	0.22
Small Challenge	605	0.16
No challenge	95	0.03
Prefer Not to Answer	8	0.00

By county

Q1.5_County	Q.5.19.2	answers	percentage
Yei	Large Challenge	42	0.10
Yei	No challenge	20	0.05
Yei	Prefer Not to Answer	2	0.00
Yei	Small Challenge	192	0.47
Yei	NA	154	0.38
Wau	Large Challenge	16	0.04
Wau	No challenge	5	0.01
Wau	Small Challenge	21	0.05
Wau	NA	360	0.90
Rubkona	Large Challenge	168	0.42
Rubkona	No challenge	1	0.00
Rubkona	Small Challenge	20	0.05
Rubkona	NA	211	0.53
Pibor	Large Challenge	85	0.21
Pibor	No challenge	11	0.03
Pibor	Prefer Not to Answer	2	0.00
Pibor	Small Challenge	65	0.16
Pibor	NA	244	0.60
Morobo	Large Challenge	156	0.39
Morobo	No challenge	25	0.06
Morobo	Prefer Not to Answer	1	0.00
Morobo	Small Challenge	61	0.15
Morobo	NA	161	0.40
Malakal	Large Challenge	37	0.09
Malakal	Small Challenge	24	0.06
Malakal	NA	360	0.86
Lainya	Large Challenge	70	0.17
Lainya	No challenge	17	0.04
Lainya	Prefer Not to Answer	1	0.00
Lainya	Small Challenge	94	0.23
Lainya	NA	232	0.56
Kajo-keji	Large Challenge	65	0.16
Kajo-keji	No challenge	14	0.04
Kajo-keji	Small Challenge	82	0.21
Kajo-keji	NA	237	0.60
Bor South	Large Challenge	181	0.42
Bor South	No challenge	2	0.00
Bor South	Prefer Not to Answer	2	0.00
Bor South	Small Challenge	46	0.11
Bor South	NA	198	0.46

Q5.19.3 Conflict

Entire sample

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
NA	2157	0.59
Large Challenge	726	0.20
Small Challenge	421	0.11
No challenge	375	0.10
Prefer Not to Answer	6	0.00

By county

Q1.5_County	Q5.19.3	answers	percentage
Yei	Large Challenge	51	0.12
Yei	No challenge	103	0.25
Yei	Prefer Not to Answer	2	0.00
Yei	Small Challenge	100	0.24
Yei	NA	154	0.38
Wau	Large Challenge	15	0.04
Wau	No challenge	8	0.02
Wau	Small Challenge	19	0.05
Wau	NA	360	0.90
Rubkona	Large Challenge	127	0.32
Rubkona	No challenge	26	0.06
Rubkona	Small Challenge	36	0.09
Rubkona	NA	211	0.53
Pibor	Large Challenge	78	0.19
Pibor	No challenge	27	0.07
Pibor	Prefer Not to Answer	1	0.00
Pibor	Small Challenge	57	0.14
Pibor	NA	244	0.60
Morobo	Large Challenge	90	0.22
Morobo	No challenge	93	0.23
Morobo	Small Challenge	60	0.15
Morobo	NA	161	0.40
Malakal	Large Challenge	38	0.09
Malakal	No challenge	14	0.03
Malakal	Small Challenge	9	0.02
Malakal	NA	360	0.86
Lainya	Large Challenge	112	0.27
Lainya	No challenge	21	0.05
Lainya	Small Challenge	49	0.12
Lainya	NA	232	0.56
Kajo-keji	Large Challenge	79	0.20
Kajo-keji	No challenge	36	0.09
Kajo-keji	Prefer Not to Answer	2	0.01
Kajo-keji	Small Challenge	44	0.11
Kajo-keji	NA	237	0.60
Bor South	Large Challenge	136	0.32
Bor South	No challenge	47	0.11
Bor South	Prefer Not to Answer	1	0.00
Bor South	Small Challenge	47	0.11
Bor South	NA	198	0.46

Q5.19.4 Droughts

Entire sample

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
NA	2157	0.59
No challenge	594	0.16
Small Challenge	544	0.15
Large Challenge	387	0.11
Prefer Not to Answer	3	0.00

By county

Q1.5_County	Q5.19.4	answers	percentage
Yei	Large Challenge	14	0.03
Yei	No challenge	153	0.37
Yei	Prefer Not to Answer	1	0.00
Yei	Small Challenge	88	0.21
Yei	NA	154	0.38
Wau	Large Challenge	12	0.03
Wau	No challenge	15	0.04
Wau	Small Challenge	15	0.04
Wau	NA	360	0.90
Rubkona	Large Challenge	106	0.26
Rubkona	No challenge	61	0.15
Rubkona	Small Challenge	22	0.06
Rubkona	NA	211	0.53
Pibor	Large Challenge	51	0.13
Pibor	No challenge	28	0.07
Pibor	Prefer Not to Answer	1	0.00
Pibor	Small Challenge	83	0.20
Pibor	NA	244	0.60
Morobo	Large Challenge	71	0.18
Morobo	No challenge	88	0.22
Morobo	Small Challenge	84	0.21
Morobo	NA	161	0.40
Malakal	Large Challenge	39	0.09
Malakal	No challenge	14	0.03
Malakal	Small Challenge	8	0.02
Malakal	NA	360	0.86
Lainya	Large Challenge	39	0.09
Lainya	No challenge	75	0.18
Lainya	Small Challenge	68	0.16
Lainya	NA	232	0.56
Kajo-keji	Large Challenge	29	0.07
Kajo-keji	No challenge	71	0.18
Kajo-keji	Small Challenge	61	0.15
Kajo-keji	NA	237	0.60
Bor South	Large Challenge	26	0.06
Bor South	No challenge	89	0.21
Bor South	Prefer Not to Answer	1	0.00
Bor South	Small Challenge	115	0.27
Bor South	NA	198	0.46

Q5.19.7 Floods

Entire sample

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
NA	2157	0.59
No challenge	642	0.17
Large Challenge	555	0.15
Small Challenge	326	0.09
Prefer Not to Answer	5	0.00

By county

Q1.5_County	Q5.19.7	answers	percentage
Yei	Large Challenge	2	0.00
Yei	No challenge	217	0.53
Yei	Prefer Not to Answer	1	0.00
Yei	Small Challenge	36	0.09
Yei	NA	154	0.38
Wau	Large Challenge	7	0.02
Wau	No challenge	17	0.04
Wau	Small Challenge	18	0.04
Wau	NA	360	0.90
Rubkona	Large Challenge	166	0.42
Rubkona	No challenge	3	0.01
Rubkona	Prefer Not to Answer	2	0.00
Rubkona	Small Challenge	18	0.04
Rubkona	NA	211	0.53
Pibor	Large Challenge	49	0.12
Pibor	No challenge	19	0.05
Pibor	Small Challenge	95	0.23
Pibor	NA	244	0.60
Morobo	Large Challenge	40	0.10
Morobo	No challenge	154	0.38
Morobo	Small Challenge	49	0.12
Morobo	NA	161	0.40
Malakal	Large Challenge	45	0.11
Malakal	No challenge	11	0.03
Malakal	Small Challenge	5	0.01
Malakal	NA	360	0.86
Lainya	Large Challenge	27	0.07
Lainya	No challenge	109	0.26
Lainya	Small Challenge	46	0.11
Lainya	NA	232	0.56
Kajo-keji	Large Challenge	17	0.04
Kajo-keji	No challenge	108	0.27
Kajo-keji	Small Challenge	36	0.09
Kajo-keji	NA	237	0.60
Bor South	Large Challenge	202	0.47
Bor South	No challenge	4	0.01
Bor South	Prefer Not to Answer	2	0.00
Bor South	Small Challenge	23	0.05
Bor South	NA	198	0.46

Q5.19.9 Changes in temperature

Entire sample

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
NA	2157	0.59
Small Challenge	765	0.21
Large Challenge	512	0.14
No challenge	247	0.07
Prefer Not to Answer	4	0.00

By county

Q1.5_County	Q5.19.9	answers	percentage
Yei	Large Challenge	57	0.14
Yei	No challenge	47	0.11
Yei	Small Challenge	152	0.37
Yei	NA	154	0.38
Wau	Large Challenge	20	0.05
Wau	No challenge	7	0.02
Wau	Small Challenge	15	0.04
Wau	NA	360	0.90
Rubkona	Large Challenge	134	0.34
Rubkona	No challenge	1	0.00
Rubkona	Small Challenge	54	0.14
Rubkona	NA	211	0.53
Pibor	Large Challenge	39	0.10
Pibor	No challenge	30	0.07
Pibor	Small Challenge	94	0.23
Pibor	NA	244	0.60
Morobo	Large Challenge	70	0.17
Morobo	No challenge	54	0.13
Morobo	Prefer Not to Answer	1	0.00
Morobo	Small Challenge	118	0.29
Morobo	NA	161	0.40
Malakal	Large Challenge	27	0.06
Malakal	No challenge	13	0.03
Malakal	Prefer Not to Answer	1	0.00
Malakal	Small Challenge	20	0.05
Malakal	NA	360	0.86
Lainya	Large Challenge	45	0.11
Lainya	No challenge	43	0.10
Lainya	Small Challenge	94	0.23
Lainya	NA	232	0.56
Kajo-keji	Large Challenge	50	0.13
Kajo-keji	No challenge	40	0.10
Kajo-keji	Prefer Not to Answer	1	0.00
Kajo-keji	Small Challenge	70	0.18
Kajo-keji	NA	237	0.60
Bor South	Large Challenge	70	0.16
Bor South	No challenge	12	0.03
Bor South	Prefer Not to Answer	1	0.00
Bor South	Small Challenge	148	0.34
Bor South	NA	198	0.46

Q5.19.10 Selling for a fair price

Entire sample

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
NA	2157	0.59
Small Challenge	738	0.20
Large Challenge	569	0.15
No challenge	219	0.06
Prefer Not to Answer	2	0.00

By county

Q1.5_County	Q5.19.10	answers	percentage
Yei	Large Challenge	42	0.10
Yei	No challenge	53	0.13
Yei	Small Challenge	161	0.39
Yei	NA	154	0.38
Wau	Large Challenge	16	0.04
Wau	No challenge	10	0.02
Wau	Small Challenge	16	0.04
Wau	NA	360	0.90
Rubkona	Large Challenge	105	0.26
Rubkona	No challenge	6	0.01
Rubkona	Small Challenge	78	0.20
Rubkona	NA	211	0.53
Pibor	Large Challenge	40	0.10
Pibor	No challenge	58	0.14
Pibor	Prefer Not to Answer	1	0.00
Pibor	Small Challenge	64	0.16
Pibor	NA	244	0.60
Morobo	Large Challenge	140	0.35
Morobo	No challenge	15	0.04
Morobo	Small Challenge	88	0.22
Morobo	NA	161	0.40
Malakal	Large Challenge	35	0.08
Malakal	No challenge	10	0.02
Malakal	Small Challenge	16	0.04
Malakal	NA	360	0.86
Lainya	Large Challenge	64	0.15
Lainya	No challenge	27	0.07
Lainya	Small Challenge	91	0.22
Lainya	NA	232	0.56
Kajo-keji	Large Challenge	89	0.22
Kajo-keji	No challenge	13	0.03
Kajo-keji	Small Challenge	59	0.15
Kajo-keji	NA	237	0.60
Bor South	Large Challenge	38	0.09
Bor South	No challenge	27	0.06
Bor South	Prefer Not to Answer	1	0.00
Bor South	Small Challenge	165	0.38
Bor South	NA	198	0.46

Q5.19.12 Theft

Entire sample

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
NA	2157	0.59
Small Challenge	598	0.16
No challenge	492	0.13
Large Challenge	435	0.12
Prefer Not to Answer	3	0.00

By county

Q1.5_County	Q5.19.12	answers	percentage
Yei	Large Challenge	20	0.05
Yei	No challenge	144	0.35
Yei	Small Challenge	92	0.22
Yei	NA	154	0.38
Wau	Large Challenge	20	0.05
Wau	No challenge	6	0.01
Wau	Prefer Not to Answer	1	0.00
Wau	Small Challenge	15	0.04
Wau	NA	360	0.90
Rubkona	Large Challenge	96	0.24
Rubkona	No challenge	37	0.09
Rubkona	Small Challenge	56	0.14
Rubkona	NA	211	0.53
Pibor	Large Challenge	62	0.15
Pibor	No challenge	40	0.10
Pibor	Small Challenge	61	0.15
Pibor	NA	244	0.60
Morobo	Large Challenge	66	0.16
Morobo	No challenge	96	0.24
Morobo	Small Challenge	81	0.20
Morobo	NA	161	0.40
Malakal	Large Challenge	31	0.07
Malakal	No challenge	12	0.03
Malakal	Small Challenge	18	0.04
Malakal	NA	360	0.86
Lainya	Large Challenge	36	0.09
Lainya	No challenge	43	0.10
Lainya	Prefer Not to Answer	1	0.00
Lainya	Small Challenge	102	0.25
Lainya	NA	232	0.56
Kajo-keji	Large Challenge	20	0.05
Kajo-keji	No challenge	54	0.14
Kajo-keji	Small Challenge	87	0.22
Kajo-keji	NA	237	0.60
Bor South	Large Challenge	84	0.20
Bor South	No challenge	60	0.14
Bor South	Prefer Not to Answer	1	0.00
Bor South	Small Challenge	86	0.20
Bor South	NA	198	0.46

Q5.19.13 Theft

Entire sample

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
NA	2157	0.59
Small Challenge	600	0.16
Large Challenge	584	0.16
No challenge	339	0.09
Prefer Not to Answer	5	0.00

By county

Q1.5_County	Q5.19.13	answers	percentage
Yei	Large Challenge	17	0.04
Yei	No challenge	114	0.28
Yei	Small Challenge	125	0.30
Yei	NA	154	0.38
Wau	Large Challenge	11	0.03
Wau	No challenge	15	0.04
Wau	Small Challenge	16	0.04
Wau	NA	360	0.90
Rubkona	Large Challenge	111	0.28
Rubkona	No challenge	2	0.00
Rubkona	Prefer Not to Answer	1	0.00
Rubkona	Small Challenge	75	0.19
Rubkona	NA	211	0.53
Pibor	Large Challenge	62	0.15
Pibor	No challenge	21	0.05
Pibor	Prefer Not to Answer	1	0.00
Pibor	Small Challenge	79	0.19
Pibor	NA	244	0.60
Morobo	Large Challenge	110	0.27
Morobo	No challenge	50	0.12
Morobo	Small Challenge	83	0.21
Morobo	NA	161	0.40
Malakal	Large Challenge	38	0.09
Malakal	No challenge	11	0.03
Malakal	Small Challenge	12	0.03
Malakal	NA	360	0.86
Lainya	Large Challenge	89	0.21
Lainya	No challenge	38	0.09
Lainya	Prefer Not to Answer	1	0.00
Lainya	Small Challenge	54	0.13
Lainya	NA	232	0.56
Kajo-keji	Large Challenge	59	0.15
Kajo-keji	No challenge	41	0.10
Kajo-keji	Prefer Not to Answer	1	0.00
Kajo-keji	Small Challenge	60	0.15
Kajo-keji	NA	237	0.60
Bor South	Large Challenge	87	0.20
Bor South	No challenge	47	0.11
Bor South	Prefer Not to Answer	1	0.00
Bor South	Small Challenge	96	0.22
Bor South	NA	198	0.46

Q5.20 Does your household practice fishing?

Entire sample

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
No	2618	0.71
Yes	1055	0.29
Prefer not to answer	12	0.00

By county

Q1.5_County	Q5.20	answers	percentage
Yei	No	294	0.72
Yei	Yes	116	0.28
Wau	No	387	0.96
Wau	Yes	15	0.04
Rubkona	No	211	0.53
Rubkona	Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Rubkona	Yes	188	0.47
Pibor	No	228	0.56
Pibor	Prefer not to answer	2	0.00
Pibor	Yes	177	0.43
Morobo	No	330	0.82
Morobo	Yes	74	0.18
Malakal	No	278	0.66
Malakal	Yes	143	0.34
Lainya	No	306	0.74
Lainya	Prefer not to answer	2	0.00
Lainya	Yes	106	0.26
Kajo-keji	No	334	0.84
Kajo-keji	Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Kajo-keji	Yes	63	0.16
Bor South	No	250	0.58
Bor South	Prefer not to answer	6	0.01
Bor South	Yes	173	0.40

Q5.21 Please tell me whether each poses no challenge, a small challenge, or a large challenge to your household’s ability to make an income from fishing.

Q5.21.1 Lack of fishing kits

Entire sample

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
NA	2630	0.71
Large Challenge	641	0.17
Small Challenge	362	0.10
No challenge	52	0.01

By county

Q1.5_County	Q.5.21.1	answers	percentage
Yei	Large Challenge	29	0.07
Yei	No challenge	17	0.04
Yei	Small Challenge	70	0.17
Yei	NA	294	0.72
Wau	Large Challenge	5	0.01
Wau	No challenge	3	0.01
Wau	Small Challenge	7	0.02
Wau	NA	387	0.96
Rubkona	Large Challenge	141	0.35
Rubkona	No challenge	5	0.01
Rubkona	Small Challenge	42	0.10
Rubkona	NA	212	0.53
Pibor	Large Challenge	85	0.21
Pibor	No challenge	7	0.02
Pibor	Small Challenge	85	0.21
Pibor	NA	230	0.57
Morobo	Large Challenge	35	0.09
Morobo	No challenge	12	0.03
Morobo	Small Challenge	27	0.07
Morobo	NA	330	0.82
Malakal	Large Challenge	65	0.15
Malakal	No challenge	2	0.00
Malakal	Small Challenge	76	0.18
Malakal	NA	278	0.66
Lainya	Large Challenge	76	0.18
Lainya	No challenge	3	0.01
Lainya	Small Challenge	27	0.07
Lainya	NA	308	0.74
Kajo-keji	Large Challenge	47	0.12
Kajo-keji	No challenge	2	0.01
Kajo-keji	Small Challenge	14	0.04
Kajo-keji	NA	335	0.84
Bor South	Large Challenge	158	0.37
Bor South	No challenge	1	0.00
Bor South	Small Challenge	14	0.03
Bor South	NA	256	0.60

Q5.21.2 Lack of preservation equipment

Entire sample

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
NA	2630	0.71
Large Challenge	559	0.15
Small Challenge	415	0.11
No challenge	79	0.02
Prefer Not to Answer	2	0.00

By county

Q1.5_County	Q.5.21.2	answers	percentage
Yei	Large Challenge	39	0.10
Yei	No challenge	24	0.06
Yei	Small Challenge	53	0.13
Yei	NA	294	0.72
Wau	Large Challenge	6	0.01
Wau	No challenge	1	0.00
Wau	Small Challenge	8	0.02
Wau	NA	387	0.96
Rubkona	Large Challenge	125	0.31
Rubkona	No challenge	1	0.00
Rubkona	Prefer Not to Answer	1	0.00
Rubkona	Small Challenge	61	0.15
Rubkona	NA	212	0.53
Pibor	Large Challenge	80	0.20
Pibor	No challenge	13	0.03
Pibor	Small Challenge	84	0.21
Pibor	NA	230	0.57
Morobo	Large Challenge	35	0.09
Morobo	No challenge	8	0.02
Morobo	Prefer Not to Answer	1	0.00
Morobo	Small Challenge	30	0.07
Morobo	NA	330	0.82
Malakal	Large Challenge	43	0.10
Malakal	No challenge	23	0.05
Malakal	Small Challenge	77	0.18
Malakal	NA	278	0.66
Lainya	Large Challenge	73	0.18
Lainya	No challenge	5	0.01
Lainya	Small Challenge	28	0.07
Lainya	NA	308	0.74
Kajo-keji	Large Challenge	33	0.08
Kajo-keji	No challenge	2	0.01
Kajo-keji	Small Challenge	28	0.07
Kajo-keji	NA	335	0.84
Bor South	Large Challenge	125	0.29
Bor South	No challenge	2	0.00
Bor South	Small Challenge	46	0.11
Bor South	NA	256	0.60

Q5.21.3 Storage

Entire sample

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
NA	2630	0.71
Small Challenge	454	0.12
Large Challenge	452	0.12
No challenge	147	0.04
Prefer Not to Answer	2	0.00

By county

Q1.5_County	Q.5.21.3	answers	percentage
Yei	Large Challenge	20	0.05
Yei	No challenge	39	0.10
Yei	Small Challenge	57	0.14
Yei	NA	294	0.72
Wau	Large Challenge	2	0.00
Wau	No challenge	7	0.02
Wau	Small Challenge	6	0.01
Wau	NA	387	0.96
Rubkona	Large Challenge	113	0.28
Rubkona	Prefer Not to Answer	1	0.00
Rubkona	Small Challenge	74	0.18
Rubkona	NA	212	0.53
Pibor	Large Challenge	59	0.14
Pibor	No challenge	25	0.06
Pibor	Small Challenge	93	0.23
Pibor	NA	230	0.57
Morobo	Large Challenge	44	0.11
Morobo	No challenge	11	0.03
Morobo	Small Challenge	19	0.05
Morobo	NA	330	0.82
Malakal	Large Challenge	42	0.10
Malakal	No challenge	32	0.08
Malakal	Small Challenge	69	0.16
Malakal	NA	278	0.66
Lainya	Large Challenge	70	0.17
Lainya	No challenge	12	0.03
Lainya	Small Challenge	24	0.06
Lainya	NA	308	0.74
Kajo-keji	Large Challenge	26	0.07
Kajo-keji	No challenge	5	0.01
Kajo-keji	Small Challenge	32	0.08
Kajo-keji	NA	335	0.84
Bor South	Large Challenge	76	0.18
Bor South	No challenge	16	0.04
Bor South	Prefer Not to Answer	1	0.00
Bor South	Small Challenge	80	0.19
Bor South	NA	256	0.60

Q5.21.4 Conflict

Entire sample

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
NA	2630	0.71
Large Challenge	472	0.13
Small Challenge	302	0.08
No challenge	280	0.08
Prefer Not to Answer	1	0.00

By county

Q1.5_County	Q5.21.4	answers	percentage
Yei	Large Challenge	18	0.04
Yei	No challenge	45	0.11
Yei	Small Challenge	53	0.13
Yei	NA	294	0.72
Wau	Large Challenge	6	0.01
Wau	No challenge	3	0.01
Wau	Small Challenge	6	0.01
Wau	NA	387	0.96
Rubkona	Large Challenge	118	0.30
Rubkona	No challenge	36	0.09
Rubkona	Small Challenge	34	0.09
Rubkona	NA	212	0.53
Pibor	Large Challenge	54	0.13
Pibor	No challenge	40	0.10
Pibor	Small Challenge	83	0.20
Pibor	NA	230	0.57
Morobo	Large Challenge	36	0.09
Morobo	No challenge	17	0.04
Morobo	Small Challenge	21	0.05
Morobo	NA	330	0.82
Malakal	Large Challenge	75	0.18
Malakal	No challenge	40	0.10
Malakal	Small Challenge	28	0.07
Malakal	NA	278	0.66
Lainya	Large Challenge	74	0.18
Lainya	No challenge	12	0.03
Lainya	Prefer Not to Answer	1	0.00
Lainya	Small Challenge	19	0.05
Lainya	NA	308	0.74
Kajo-keji	Large Challenge	31	0.08
Kajo-keji	No challenge	15	0.04
Kajo-keji	Small Challenge	17	0.04
Kajo-keji	NA	335	0.84
Bor South	Large Challenge	60	0.14
Bor South	No challenge	72	0.17
Bor South	Small Challenge	41	0.10
Bor South	NA	256	0.60

Q5.21.5 Droughts

Entire sample

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
NA	2630	0.71
Small Challenge	389	0.11
No challenge	371	0.10
Large Challenge	293	0.08
Prefer Not to Answer	2	0.00

By county

Q1.5_County	Q5.21.5	answers	percentage
Yei	Large Challenge	2	0.00
Yei	No challenge	67	0.16
Yei	Prefer Not to Answer	1	0.00
Yei	Small Challenge	46	0.11
Yei	NA	294	0.72
Wau	Large Challenge	3	0.01
Wau	No challenge	8	0.02
Wau	Small Challenge	4	0.01
Wau	NA	387	0.96
Rubkona	Large Challenge	89	0.22
Rubkona	No challenge	67	0.17
Rubkona	Prefer Not to Answer	1	0.00
Rubkona	Small Challenge	31	0.08
Rubkona	NA	212	0.53
Pibor	Large Challenge	47	0.12
Pibor	No challenge	27	0.07
Pibor	Small Challenge	103	0.25
Pibor	NA	230	0.57
Morobo	Large Challenge	42	0.10
Morobo	No challenge	6	0.01
Morobo	Small Challenge	26	0.06
Morobo	NA	330	0.82
Malakal	Large Challenge	42	0.10
Malakal	No challenge	59	0.14
Malakal	Small Challenge	42	0.10
Malakal	NA	278	0.66
Lainya	Large Challenge	40	0.10
Lainya	No challenge	26	0.06
Lainya	Small Challenge	40	0.10
Lainya	NA	308	0.74
Kajo-keji	Large Challenge	13	0.03
Kajo-keji	No challenge	28	0.07
Kajo-keji	Small Challenge	22	0.06
Kajo-keji	NA	335	0.84
Bor South	Large Challenge	15	0.03
Bor South	No challenge	83	0.19
Bor South	Small Challenge	75	0.17
Bor South	NA	256	0.60

Q5.21.6 Floods

Entire sample

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
NA	2630	0.71
Large Challenge	502	0.14
Small Challenge	302	0.08
No challenge	248	0.07
Prefer Not to Answer	3	0.00

By county

Q1.5_County	Q5.21.6	answers	percentage
Yei	Large Challenge	3	0.01
Yei	No challenge	91	0.22
Yei	Small Challenge	22	0.05
Yei	NA	294	0.72
Wau	Large Challenge	2	0.00
Wau	No challenge	8	0.02
Wau	Small Challenge	5	0.01
Wau	NA	387	0.96
Rubkona	Large Challenge	164	0.41
Rubkona	No challenge	1	0.00
Rubkona	Prefer Not to Answer	1	0.00
Rubkona	Small Challenge	22	0.06
Rubkona	NA	212	0.53
Pibor	Large Challenge	42	0.10
Pibor	No challenge	23	0.06
Pibor	Small Challenge	112	0.28
Pibor	NA	230	0.57
Morobo	Large Challenge	25	0.06
Morobo	No challenge	16	0.04
Morobo	Small Challenge	33	0.08
Morobo	NA	330	0.82
Malakal	Large Challenge	98	0.23
Malakal	No challenge	25	0.06
Malakal	Small Challenge	20	0.05
Malakal	NA	278	0.66
Lainya	Large Challenge	27	0.07
Lainya	No challenge	34	0.08
Lainya	Prefer Not to Answer	1	0.00
Lainya	Small Challenge	44	0.11
Lainya	NA	308	0.74
Kajo-keji	Large Challenge	8	0.02
Kajo-keji	No challenge	40	0.10
Kajo-keji	Prefer Not to Answer	1	0.00
Kajo-keji	Small Challenge	14	0.04
Kajo-keji	NA	335	0.84
Bor South	Large Challenge	133	0.31
Bor South	No challenge	10	0.02
Bor South	Small Challenge	30	0.07
Bor South	NA	256	0.60

Q5.21.8 Changes in temperature

Entire sample

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
NA	2630	0.71
Small Challenge	522	0.14
Large Challenge	346	0.09
No challenge	187	0.05

By county

Q1.5_County	Q5.21.8	answers	percentage
Yei	Large Challenge	18	0.04
Yei	No challenge	23	0.06
Yei	Small Challenge	75	0.18
Yei	NA	294	0.72
Wau	Large Challenge	2	0.00
Wau	No challenge	2	0.00
Wau	Small Challenge	11	0.03
Wau	NA	387	0.96
Rubkona	Large Challenge	133	0.33
Rubkona	No challenge	1	0.00
Rubkona	Small Challenge	54	0.14
Rubkona	NA	212	0.53
Pibor	Large Challenge	34	0.08
Pibor	No challenge	41	0.10
Pibor	Small Challenge	102	0.25
Pibor	NA	230	0.57
Morobo	Large Challenge	27	0.07
Morobo	No challenge	13	0.03
Morobo	Small Challenge	34	0.08
Morobo	NA	330	0.82
Malakal	Large Challenge	33	0.08
Malakal	No challenge	65	0.15
Malakal	Small Challenge	45	0.11
Malakal	NA	278	0.66
Lainya	Large Challenge	42	0.10
Lainya	No challenge	11	0.03
Lainya	Small Challenge	53	0.13
Lainya	NA	308	0.74
Kajo-keji	Large Challenge	8	0.02
Kajo-keji	No challenge	22	0.06
Kajo-keji	Small Challenge	33	0.08
Kajo-keji	NA	335	0.84
Bor South	Large Challenge	49	0.11
Bor South	No challenge	9	0.02
Bor South	Small Challenge	115	0.27
Bor South	NA	256	0.60

Q5.21.9 Selling for a fair price

Entire sample

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
NA	2630	0.71
Small Challenge	573	0.16
Large Challenge	284	0.08
No challenge	195	0.05
Prefer Not to Answer	3	0.00

By county

Q1.5_County	Q5.21.9	answers	percentage
Yei	Large Challenge	17	0.04
Yei	No challenge	17	0.04
Yei	Small Challenge	82	0.20
Yei	NA	294	0.72
Wau	Large Challenge	7	0.02
Wau	No challenge	4	0.01
Wau	Prefer Not to Answer	1	0.00
Wau	Small Challenge	3	0.01
Wau	NA	387	0.96
Rubkona	Large Challenge	84	0.21
Rubkona	No challenge	10	0.03
Rubkona	Small Challenge	94	0.23
Rubkona	NA	212	0.53
Pibor	Large Challenge	21	0.05
Pibor	No challenge	86	0.21
Pibor	Prefer Not to Answer	1	0.00
Pibor	Small Challenge	69	0.17
Pibor	NA	230	0.57
Morobo	Large Challenge	38	0.09
Morobo	No challenge	7	0.02
Morobo	Small Challenge	29	0.07
Morobo	NA	330	0.82
Malakal	Large Challenge	43	0.10
Malakal	No challenge	30	0.07
Malakal	Small Challenge	70	0.17
Malakal	NA	278	0.66
Lainya	Large Challenge	21	0.05
Lainya	No challenge	14	0.03
Lainya	Prefer Not to Answer	1	0.00
Lainya	Small Challenge	70	0.17
Lainya	NA	308	0.74
Kajo-keji	Large Challenge	29	0.07
Kajo-keji	No challenge	6	0.02
Kajo-keji	Small Challenge	28	0.07
Kajo-keji	NA	335	0.84
Bor South	Large Challenge	24	0.06
Bor South	No challenge	21	0.05
Bor South	Small Challenge	128	0.30
Bor South	NA	256	0.60

Q5.21.10 Theft

Entire sample

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
NA	2630	0.71
Small Challenge	417	0.11
No challenge	372	0.10
Large Challenge	265	0.07
Prefer Not to Answer	1	0.00

By county

Q1.5_County	Q5.21.10	answers	percentage
Yei	Large Challenge	8	0.02
Yei	No challenge	69	0.17
Yei	Small Challenge	39	0.10
Yei	NA	294	0.72
Wau	Large Challenge	4	0.01
Wau	No challenge	4	0.01
Wau	Small Challenge	7	0.02
Wau	NA	387	0.96
Rubkona	Large Challenge	88	0.22
Rubkona	No challenge	41	0.10
Rubkona	Small Challenge	59	0.15
Rubkona	NA	212	0.53
Pibor	Large Challenge	33	0.08
Pibor	No challenge	64	0.16
Pibor	Small Challenge	80	0.20
Pibor	NA	230	0.57
Morobo	Large Challenge	19	0.05
Morobo	No challenge	35	0.09
Morobo	Small Challenge	20	0.05
Morobo	NA	330	0.82
Malakal	Large Challenge	54	0.13
Malakal	No challenge	30	0.07
Malakal	Small Challenge	59	0.14
Malakal	NA	278	0.66
Lainya	Large Challenge	20	0.05
Lainya	No challenge	30	0.07
Lainya	Small Challenge	56	0.14
Lainya	NA	308	0.74
Kajo-keji	Large Challenge	2	0.01
Kajo-keji	No challenge	25	0.06
Kajo-keji	Prefer Not to Answer	1	0.00
Kajo-keji	Small Challenge	35	0.09
Kajo-keji	NA	335	0.84
Bor South	Large Challenge	37	0.09
Bor South	No challenge	74	0.17
Bor South	Small Challenge	62	0.14
Bor South	NA	256	0.60

6) Societal Fragility

All the answers are in a scale of 0-1, i.e. can have the following values: 0, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1. The higher, the more fragile.

The higher, the more fragile.

Ex: 0 = Not severe at all 0.25 = Not severe 0.50 = Somewhat severe 0.75 = Severe 1 = Extremely severe

Index Questions

Q6.1 How much do you feel welcomed or accepted in your current community?

Entire sample

mean
0.32

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
Accepted	2133	57.88
Very accepted	902	24.48
A little accepted	548	14.87
Not at all accepted	100	2.71
_2. Prefer not to answer	2	0.05

By county

County	Mean Response (0 to 1)
Bor South	0.31
Kajo-keji	0.18
Lainya	0.34
Malakal	0.36
Morobo	0.33
Pibor	0.46
Rubkona	0.24
Wau	0.28
Yei	0.35

Q1.5_County	Q6.1_raw	answers	percentage
Yei	Not at all accepted	8	1.95
Yei	A little accepted	83	20.24
Yei	Accepted	241	58.78
Yei	Very accepted	78	19.02
Wau	Not at all accepted	7	1.74
Wau	A little accepted	33	8.21
Wau	Accepted	252	62.69
Wau	Very accepted	110	27.36
Rubkona	Not at all accepted	9	2.25
Rubkona	A little accepted	31	7.75
Rubkona	Accepted	203	50.75
Rubkona	Very accepted	156	39.00
Rubkona	_2. Prefer not to answer	1	0.25
Pibor	Not at all accepted	37	9.09
Pibor	A little accepted	124	30.47
Pibor	Accepted	199	48.89
Pibor	Very accepted	47	11.55
Morobo	Not at all accepted	15	3.71
Morobo	A little accepted	67	16.58
Morobo	Accepted	222	54.95
Morobo	Very accepted	100	24.75
Malakal	Not at all accepted	2	0.48
Malakal	A little accepted	55	13.06
Malakal	Accepted	346	82.19
Malakal	Very accepted	18	4.28
Lainya	Not at all accepted	18	4.35
Lainya	A little accepted	55	13.29
Lainya	Accepted	260	62.80
Lainya	Very accepted	80	19.32
Lainya	_2. Prefer not to answer	1	0.24
Kajo-keji	Not at all accepted	2	0.50
Kajo-keji	A little accepted	24	6.03
Kajo-keji	Accepted	165	41.46
Kajo-keji	Very accepted	207	52.01
Bor South	Not at all accepted	2	0.47
Bor South	A little accepted	76	17.72
Bor South	Accepted	245	57.11
Bor South	Very accepted	106	24.71

Q6.2 In the past year, how often, if at all, have you been personally discriminated against based on any of the following: your gender, your religion, your ethnicity, any disability you might have, or your place of origin?

Entire sample

mean
0.23

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
Never	1827	49.58
Sometimes	1369	37.15
Always	242	6.57
Often	241	6.54
_2. Prefer not to answer	6	0.16

By county

County	Mean Response (0 to 1)
Bor South	0.24
Kajo-keji	0.21
Lainya	0.29
Malakal	0.15
Morobo	0.30
Pibor	0.29
Rubkona	0.24
Wau	0.22
Yei	0.16

Q1.5_County	Q6.2_raw	answers	percentage
Yei	Never	228	55.61
Yei	Sometimes	168	40.98
Yei	Often	10	2.44
Yei	Always	4	0.98
Wau	Never	226	56.22
Wau	Sometimes	110	27.36
Wau	Often	38	9.45
Wau	Always	25	6.22
Wau	_2. Prefer not to answer	3	0.75
Rubkona	Never	203	50.75
Rubkona	Sometimes	130	32.50
Rubkona	Often	44	11.00
Rubkona	Always	22	5.50
Rubkona	_2. Prefer not to answer	1	0.25
Pibor	Never	129	31.70
Pibor	Sometimes	214	52.58
Pibor	Often	45	11.06
Pibor	Always	19	4.67
Morobo	Never	170	42.08
Morobo	Sometimes	145	35.89
Morobo	Often	53	13.12
Morobo	Always	36	8.91
Malakal	Never	252	59.86
Malakal	Sometimes	152	36.10
Malakal	Often	14	3.33
Malakal	Always	3	0.71
Lainya	Never	172	41.55
Lainya	Sometimes	170	41.06
Lainya	Often	26	6.28
Lainya	Always	46	11.11
Kajo-keji	Never	186	46.73
Kajo-keji	Sometimes	183	45.98
Kajo-keji	Often	9	2.26
Kajo-keji	Always	18	4.52
Kajo-keji	_2. Prefer not to answer	2	0.50
Bor South	Never	261	60.84
Bor South	Sometimes	97	22.61
Bor South	Often	2	0.47
Bor South	Always	69	16.08

Q6.3 To what extent do you agree with the following statement? “People in your boma are willing to help each other.”

Entire sample

mean
0.3

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
Agree	2264	61.44
Strongly agree	603	16.36
Neither agree nor disagree	354	9.61
Disagree	333	9.04
Strongly disagree	126	3.42
_2. Prefer not to answer	5	0.14

By county

County	Mean Response (0 to 1)
Bor South	0.20
Kajo-keji	0.27
Lainya	0.30
Malakal	0.26
Morobo	0.35
Pibor	0.47
Rubkona	0.27
Wau	0.29
Yei	0.32

Q1.5_County	Q6.3_raw	answers	percentage
Yei	Strongly disagree	6	1.46
Yei	Disagree	38	9.27
Yei	Neither agree nor disagree	45	10.98
Yei	Agree	303	73.90
Yei	Strongly agree	18	4.39
Wau	Strongly disagree	6	1.49
Wau	Disagree	26	6.47
Wau	Neither agree nor disagree	52	12.94
Wau	Agree	253	62.94
Wau	Strongly agree	64	15.92
Wau	_2. Prefer not to answer	1	0.25
Rubkona	Strongly disagree	14	3.50
Rubkona	Disagree	37	9.25
Rubkona	Neither agree nor disagree	19	4.75
Rubkona	Agree	229	57.25
Rubkona	Strongly agree	100	25.00
Rubkona	_2. Prefer not to answer	1	0.25
Pibor	Strongly disagree	27	6.63
Pibor	Disagree	110	27.03
Pibor	Neither agree nor disagree	81	19.90
Pibor	Agree	170	41.77
Pibor	Strongly agree	19	4.67
Morobo	Strongly disagree	41	10.15
Morobo	Disagree	47	11.63
Morobo	Neither agree nor disagree	29	7.18
Morobo	Agree	210	51.98
Morobo	Strongly agree	77	19.06
Malakal	Strongly disagree	1	0.24
Malakal	Disagree	12	2.85
Malakal	Neither agree nor disagree	4	0.95
Malakal	Agree	386	91.69
Malakal	Strongly agree	18	4.28
Lainya	Strongly disagree	8	1.93
Lainya	Disagree	39	9.42
Lainya	Neither agree nor disagree	52	12.56
Lainya	Agree	250	60.39
Lainya	Strongly agree	64	15.46
Lainya	_2. Prefer not to answer	1	0.24
Kajo-keji	Strongly disagree	21	5.28
Kajo-keji	Disagree	20	5.03
Kajo-keji	Neither agree nor disagree	40	10.05
Kajo-keji	Agree	206	51.76
Kajo-keji	Strongly agree	109	27.39
Kajo-keji	_2. Prefer not to answer	2	0.50
Bor South	Strongly disagree	2	0.47
Bor South	Disagree	4	0.93
Bor South	Neither agree nor disagree	32	7.46
Bor South	Agree	257	59.91
Bor South	Strongly agree	134	31.24

Q6.4 Imagine that you were in an argument with your neighbor about a small issue. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement? “I know who I could seek help from to resolve this argument.”

Entire sample

mean
0.33

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
Agree	2274	61.71
Strongly agree	493	13.38
Neither agree nor disagree	363	9.85
Disagree	360	9.77
Strongly disagree	176	4.78
_2. Prefer not to answer	19	0.52

By county

County	Mean Response (0 to 1)
Bor South	0.21
Kajo-keji	0.29
Lainya	0.32
Malakal	0.26
Morobo	0.32
Pibor	0.54
Rubkona	0.32
Wau	0.34
Yei	0.33

Q1.5_County	Q6.4_raw	answers	percentage
Yei	Strongly disagree	13	3.17
Yei	Disagree	42	10.24
Yei	Neither agree nor disagree	35	8.54
Yei	Agree	296	72.20
Yei	Strongly agree	24	5.85
Wau	Strongly disagree	7	1.74
Wau	Disagree	52	12.94
Wau	Neither agree nor disagree	62	15.42
Wau	Agree	235	58.46
Wau	Strongly agree	40	9.95
Wau	_2. Prefer not to answer	6	1.49
Rubkona	Strongly disagree	19	4.75
Rubkona	Disagree	49	12.25
Rubkona	Neither agree nor disagree	40	10.00
Rubkona	Agree	215	53.75
Rubkona	Strongly agree	76	19.00
Rubkona	_2. Prefer not to answer	1	0.25
Pibor	Strongly disagree	64	15.72
Pibor	Disagree	112	27.52
Pibor	Neither agree nor disagree	71	17.44
Pibor	Agree	148	36.36
Pibor	Strongly agree	11	2.70
Pibor	_2. Prefer not to answer	1	0.25
Morobo	Strongly disagree	37	9.16
Morobo	Disagree	25	6.19
Morobo	Neither agree nor disagree	26	6.44
Morobo	Agree	238	58.91
Morobo	Strongly agree	78	19.31
Malakal	Disagree	13	3.09
Malakal	Neither agree nor disagree	6	1.43
Malakal	Agree	392	93.11
Malakal	Strongly agree	10	2.38
Lainya	Strongly disagree	17	4.11
Lainya	Disagree	37	8.94
Lainya	Neither agree nor disagree	44	10.63
Lainya	Agree	268	64.73
Lainya	Strongly agree	46	11.11
Lainya	_2. Prefer not to answer	2	0.48
Kajo-keji	Strongly disagree	15	3.77
Kajo-keji	Disagree	26	6.53
Kajo-keji	Neither agree nor disagree	37	9.30
Kajo-keji	Agree	235	59.05
Kajo-keji	Strongly agree	77	19.35
Kajo-keji	_2. Prefer not to answer	8	2.01
Bor South	Strongly disagree	4	0.93
Bor South	Disagree	4	0.93
Bor South	Neither agree nor disagree	42	9.79
Bor South	Agree	247	57.58
Bor South	Strongly agree	131	30.54
Bor South	_2. Prefer not to answer	1	0.23

Q6.9 How would you describe the relationship between individuals who are not originally from the community and the rest of the community members?

Entire sample

mean
0.3

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
Good	1964	53.30
Very good	709	19.24
Neutral	614	16.66
Poor	280	7.60
Very poor	98	2.66
_2. Prefer not to answer	10	0.27
_3. Not applicable	10	0.27

By county

County	Mean Response (0 to 1)
Bor South	0.24
Kajo-keji	0.27
Lainya	0.37
Malakal	0.27
Morobo	0.31
Pibor	0.44
Rubkona	0.23
Wau	0.24
Yei	0.34

Q1.5_County	Q6.9_raw	answers	percentage
Yei	Very poor	4	0.98
Yei	Poor	14	3.41
Yei	Neutral	145	35.37
Yei	Good	215	52.44
Yei	Very good	32	7.80
Wau	Very poor	4	1.00
Wau	Poor	25	6.22
Wau	Neutral	34	8.46
Wau	Good	225	55.97
Wau	Very good	113	28.11
Wau	_2. Prefer not to answer	1	0.25
Rubkona	Very poor	8	2.00
Rubkona	Poor	19	4.75
Rubkona	Neutral	62	15.50
Rubkona	Good	162	40.50
Rubkona	Very good	148	37.00
Rubkona	_3. Not applicable	1	0.25
Pibor	Very poor	23	5.65
Pibor	Poor	92	22.60
Pibor	Neutral	97	23.83
Pibor	Good	152	37.35
Pibor	Very good	42	10.32
Pibor	_3. Not applicable	1	0.25
Morobo	Very poor	8	1.98
Morobo	Poor	29	7.18
Morobo	Neutral	58	14.36
Morobo	Good	257	63.61
Morobo	Very good	48	11.88
Morobo	_2. Prefer not to answer	1	0.25
Morobo	_3. Not applicable	3	0.74
Malakal	Very poor	3	0.71
Malakal	Poor	32	7.60
Malakal	Neutral	15	3.56
Malakal	Good	325	77.20
Malakal	Very good	46	10.93
Lainya	Very poor	22	5.31
Lainya	Poor	43	10.39
Lainya	Neutral	99	23.91
Lainya	Good	188	45.41
Lainya	Very good	61	14.73
Lainya	_2. Prefer not to answer	1	0.24
Kajo-keji	Very poor	24	6.03
Kajo-keji	Poor	14	3.52
Kajo-keji	Neutral	23	5.78
Kajo-keji	Good	230	57.79
Kajo-keji	Very good	97	24.37
Kajo-keji	_2. Prefer not to answer	6	1.51
Kajo-keji	_3. Not applicable	4	1.01
Bor South	Very poor	2	0.47
Bor South	Poor	12	2.80
Bor South	Neutral	81	18.88
Bor South	Good	210	48.95
Bor South	Very good	122	28.44
Bor South	_2. Prefer not to answer	1	0.23
Bor South	_3. Not applicable	1	0.23

Additional Questions

Q6.5 Do you feel that people live peacefully together in your community?

Entire sample

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
Yes	3220	0.87
No	447	0.12
Prefer not to answer	18	0.00

By county

Q1.5_County	Q6.5	answers	percentage
Yei	No	32	0.08
Yei	Yes	378	0.92
Wau	No	43	0.11
Wau	Prefer not to answer	3	0.01
Wau	Yes	356	0.89
Rubkona	No	28	0.07
Rubkona	Yes	372	0.93
Pibor	No	132	0.32
Pibor	Prefer not to answer	4	0.01
Pibor	Yes	271	0.67
Morobo	No	43	0.11
Morobo	Yes	361	0.89
Malakal	No	11	0.03
Malakal	Yes	410	0.97
Lainya	No	76	0.18
Lainya	Prefer not to answer	5	0.01
Lainya	Yes	333	0.80
Kajo-keji	No	40	0.10
Kajo-keji	Prefer not to answer	2	0.01
Kajo-keji	Yes	356	0.89
Bor South	No	42	0.10
Bor South	Prefer not to answer	4	0.01
Bor South	Yes	383	0.89

Q6.6 Do you feel that you have access to services in your community without discrimination?

Entire sample

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
Yes	2776	0.75
No	885	0.24
Prefer not to answer	24	0.01

By county

Q1.5_County	Q6.6	answers	percentage
Yei	No	89	0.22
Yei	Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Yei	Yes	320	0.78
Wau	No	71	0.18
Wau	Prefer not to answer	2	0.00
Wau	Yes	329	0.82
Rubkona	No	42	0.10
Rubkona	Prefer not to answer	2	0.00
Rubkona	Yes	356	0.89
Pibor	No	197	0.48
Pibor	Prefer not to answer	2	0.00
Pibor	Yes	208	0.51
Morobo	No	150	0.37
Morobo	Yes	254	0.63
Malakal	No	8	0.02
Malakal	Yes	413	0.98
Lainya	No	125	0.30
Lainya	Prefer not to answer	7	0.02
Lainya	Yes	282	0.68
Kajo-keji	No	156	0.39
Kajo-keji	Prefer not to answer	2	0.01
Kajo-keji	Yes	240	0.60
Bor South	No	47	0.11
Bor South	Prefer not to answer	8	0.02
Bor South	Yes	374	0.87

Q6.7 Do you feel that you can earn an income in your community without discrimination?

Entire sample

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
Yes	2713	0.74
No	946	0.26
Prefer not to answer	26	0.01

By county

Q1.5_County	Q6.7	answers	percentage
Yei	No	97	0.24
Yei	Yes	313	0.76
Wau	No	63	0.16
Wau	Prefer not to answer	5	0.01
Wau	Yes	334	0.83
Rubkona	No	47	0.12
Rubkona	Prefer not to answer	2	0.00
Rubkona	Yes	351	0.88
Pibor	No	211	0.52
Pibor	Prefer not to answer	2	0.00
Pibor	Yes	194	0.48
Morobo	No	164	0.41
Morobo	Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Morobo	Yes	239	0.59
Malakal	No	8	0.02
Malakal	Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Malakal	Yes	412	0.98
Lainya	No	133	0.32
Lainya	Prefer not to answer	7	0.02
Lainya	Yes	274	0.66
Kajo-keji	No	170	0.43
Kajo-keji	Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Kajo-keji	Yes	227	0.57
Bor South	No	53	0.12
Bor South	Prefer not to answer	7	0.02
Bor South	Yes	369	0.86

Q6.10 How would you describe the relationship between people who are originally from this community but left then returned and the rest of the community members?

Entire sample

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
Good	2071	0.56
Very good	818	0.22
Neutral	507	0.14
Poor	194	0.05
Very poor	71	0.02
_2. Prefer not to answer	12	0.00
_3. Not applicable	12	0.00

By county

Q1.5_County	Q6.10	answers	percentage
Yei	Very poor	4	0.01
Yei	Poor	14	0.03
Yei	Neutral	130	0.32
Yei	Good	220	0.54
Yei	Very good	40	0.10
Yei	_2. Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Yei	_3. Not applicable	1	0.00
Wau	Very poor	6	0.01
Wau	Poor	29	0.07
Wau	Neutral	50	0.12
Wau	Good	229	0.57
Wau	Very good	88	0.22
Rubkona	Very poor	4	0.01
Rubkona	Poor	11	0.03
Rubkona	Neutral	58	0.14
Rubkona	Good	179	0.45
Rubkona	Very good	147	0.37
Rubkona	_3. Not applicable	1	0.00
Pibor	Very poor	23	0.06
Pibor	Poor	70	0.17
Pibor	Neutral	72	0.18
Pibor	Good	173	0.43
Pibor	Very good	68	0.17
Pibor	_3. Not applicable	1	0.00
Morobo	Very poor	8	0.02
Morobo	Poor	27	0.07
Morobo	Neutral	47	0.12
Morobo	Good	265	0.66
Morobo	Very good	52	0.13
Morobo	_2. Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Morobo	_3. Not applicable	4	0.01
Malakal	Poor	7	0.02
Malakal	Neutral	16	0.04
Malakal	Good	359	0.85
Malakal	Very good	39	0.09
Lainya	Very poor	17	0.04
Lainya	Poor	21	0.05
Lainya	Neutral	55	0.13
Lainya	Good	199	0.48
Lainya	Very good	119	0.29
Lainya	_2. Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Lainya	_3. Not applicable	2	0.00
Kajo-keji	Very poor	9	0.02
Kajo-keji	Poor	5	0.01
Kajo-keji	Neutral	31	0.08
Kajo-keji	Good	209	0.53
Kajo-keji	Very good	133	0.33
Kajo-keji	_2. Prefer not to answer	9	0.02
Kajo-keji	_3. Not applicable	2	0.01
Bor South	Poor	10	0.02
Bor South	Neutral	48	0.11
Bor South	Good	238	0.55
Bor South	Very good	132	0.31
Bor South	_3. Not applicable	1	0.00

Q6.12 On a scale from 1 through 5 where 1 is “strongly disagree” and 5 is “strongly agree” to what extent do you agree with the following statements?

Q6.12.1 People around here are willing to help their neighbors

Entire sample

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
Agree	2408	0.65
Strongly agree	601	0.16
Neither agree nor disagree	336	0.09
Disagree	242	0.07
Strongly disagree	92	0.02
_2. Prefer not to answer	6	0.00

By county

Q1.5_County	Q6.12.1	answers	percentage
Yei	Strongly disagree	7	0.02
Yei	Disagree	26	0.06
Yei	Neither agree nor disagree	52	0.13
Yei	Agree	306	0.75
Yei	Strongly agree	19	0.05
Wau	Strongly disagree	2	0.00
Wau	Disagree	23	0.06
Wau	Neither agree nor disagree	37	0.09
Wau	Agree	280	0.70
Wau	Strongly agree	60	0.15
Rubkona	Strongly disagree	12	0.03
Rubkona	Disagree	20	0.05
Rubkona	Neither agree nor disagree	24	0.06
Rubkona	Agree	238	0.60
Rubkona	Strongly agree	105	0.26
Rubkona	_2. Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Pibor	Strongly disagree	25	0.06
Pibor	Disagree	96	0.24
Pibor	Neither agree nor disagree	62	0.15
Pibor	Agree	200	0.49
Pibor	Strongly agree	24	0.06
Morobo	Strongly disagree	28	0.07
Morobo	Disagree	34	0.08
Morobo	Neither agree nor disagree	32	0.08
Morobo	Agree	257	0.64
Morobo	Strongly agree	53	0.13
Malakal	Strongly disagree	1	0.00
Malakal	Disagree	3	0.01
Malakal	Neither agree nor disagree	5	0.01
Malakal	Agree	389	0.92
Malakal	Strongly agree	23	0.05
Lainya	Strongly disagree	8	0.02
Lainya	Disagree	21	0.05
Lainya	Neither agree nor disagree	57	0.14
Lainya	Agree	281	0.68
Lainya	Strongly agree	47	0.11
Kajo-keji	Strongly disagree	9	0.02
Kajo-keji	Disagree	13	0.03
Kajo-keji	Neither agree nor disagree	33	0.08
Kajo-keji	Agree	200	0.50
Kajo-keji	Strongly agree	138	0.35
Kajo-keji	_2. Prefer not to answer	5	0.01
Bor South	Disagree	6	0.01
Bor South	Neither agree nor disagree	34	0.08
Bor South	Agree	257	0.60
Bor South	Strongly agree	132	0.31

Q6.12.2 People around here are willing to help their neighbors

Entire sample

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
Agree	2215	0.60
Strongly agree	560	0.15
Neither agree nor disagree	495	0.13
Disagree	313	0.08
Strongly disagree	95	0.03
_2. Prefer not to answer	7	0.00

By county

Q1.5_County	Q6.12.2	answers	percentage
Yei	Strongly disagree	3	0.01
Yei	Disagree	30	0.07
Yei	Neither agree nor disagree	75	0.18
Yei	Agree	281	0.69
Yei	Strongly agree	21	0.05
Wau	Strongly disagree	17	0.04
Wau	Disagree	65	0.16
Wau	Neither agree nor disagree	87	0.22
Wau	Agree	203	0.50
Wau	Strongly agree	28	0.07
Wau	_2. Prefer not to answer	2	0.00
Rubkona	Strongly disagree	13	0.03
Rubkona	Disagree	23	0.06
Rubkona	Neither agree nor disagree	24	0.06
Rubkona	Agree	228	0.57
Rubkona	Strongly agree	111	0.28
Rubkona	_2. Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Pibor	Strongly disagree	26	0.06
Pibor	Disagree	93	0.23
Pibor	Neither agree nor disagree	83	0.20
Pibor	Agree	179	0.44
Pibor	Strongly agree	26	0.06
Morobo	Strongly disagree	16	0.04
Morobo	Disagree	39	0.10
Morobo	Neither agree nor disagree	34	0.08
Morobo	Agree	263	0.65
Morobo	Strongly agree	52	0.13
Malakal	Strongly disagree	1	0.00
Malakal	Disagree	7	0.02
Malakal	Neither agree nor disagree	4	0.01
Malakal	Agree	386	0.92
Malakal	Strongly agree	23	0.05
Lainya	Strongly disagree	8	0.02
Lainya	Disagree	41	0.10
Lainya	Neither agree nor disagree	83	0.20
Lainya	Agree	240	0.58
Lainya	Strongly agree	40	0.10
Lainya	_2. Prefer not to answer	2	0.00
Kajo-keji	Strongly disagree	11	0.03
Kajo-keji	Disagree	11	0.03
Kajo-keji	Neither agree nor disagree	61	0.15
Kajo-keji	Agree	178	0.45
Kajo-keji	Strongly agree	136	0.34
Kajo-keji	_2. Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Bor South	Disagree	4	0.01
Bor South	Neither agree nor disagree	44	0.10
Bor South	Agree	257	0.60
Bor South	Strongly agree	123	0.29
Bor South	_2. Prefer not to answer	1	0.00

Q6.12.3 The average person in your community would be willing to live next to a person of a different ethnic group.

Entire sample

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
Agree	2289	0.62
Neither agree nor disagree	497	0.13
Strongly agree	434	0.12
Disagree	345	0.09
Strongly disagree	94	0.03
_2. Prefer not to answer	26	0.01

By county

Q1.5_County	Q6.12.3	answers	percentage
Yei	Strongly disagree	7	0.02
Yei	Disagree	30	0.07
Yei	Neither agree nor disagree	59	0.14
Yei	Agree	288	0.70
Yei	Strongly agree	26	0.06
Wau	Strongly disagree	4	0.01
Wau	Disagree	34	0.08
Wau	Neither agree nor disagree	99	0.25
Wau	Agree	219	0.54
Wau	Strongly agree	39	0.10
Wau	_2. Prefer not to answer	7	0.02
Rubkona	Strongly disagree	7	0.02
Rubkona	Disagree	36	0.09
Rubkona	Neither agree nor disagree	17	0.04
Rubkona	Agree	242	0.60
Rubkona	Strongly agree	98	0.24
Pibor	Strongly disagree	32	0.08
Pibor	Disagree	71	0.17
Pibor	Neither agree nor disagree	71	0.17
Pibor	Agree	209	0.51
Pibor	Strongly agree	24	0.06
Morobo	Strongly disagree	15	0.04
Morobo	Disagree	51	0.13
Morobo	Neither agree nor disagree	33	0.08
Morobo	Agree	266	0.66
Morobo	Strongly agree	39	0.10
Malakal	Strongly disagree	1	0.00
Malakal	Disagree	32	0.08
Malakal	Neither agree nor disagree	7	0.02
Malakal	Agree	371	0.88
Malakal	Strongly agree	10	0.02
Lainya	Strongly disagree	14	0.03
Lainya	Disagree	47	0.11
Lainya	Neither agree nor disagree	78	0.19
Lainya	Agree	252	0.61
Lainya	Strongly agree	23	0.06
Kajo-keji	Strongly disagree	14	0.04
Kajo-keji	Disagree	31	0.08
Kajo-keji	Neither agree nor disagree	75	0.19
Kajo-keji	Agree	202	0.51
Kajo-keji	Strongly agree	70	0.18
Kajo-keji	_2. Prefer not to answer	6	0.02
Bor South	Disagree	13	0.03
Bor South	Neither agree nor disagree	58	0.14
Bor South	Agree	240	0.56
Bor South	Strongly agree	105	0.24
Bor South	_2. Prefer not to answer	13	0.03

Q6.12.4 The average person in your community would be willing to live next to a person of a different ethnic group.

Entire sample

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
Agree	2313	0.63
Strongly agree	539	0.15
Neither agree nor disagree	419	0.11
Disagree	307	0.08
Strongly disagree	95	0.03
_2. Prefer not to answer	12	0.00

By county

Q1.5_County	Q6.12.4	answers	percentage
Yei	Strongly disagree	2	0.00
Yei	Disagree	22	0.05
Yei	Neither agree nor disagree	64	0.16
Yei	Agree	304	0.74
Yei	Strongly agree	18	0.04
Wau	Strongly disagree	3	0.01
Wau	Disagree	23	0.06
Wau	Neither agree nor disagree	45	0.11
Wau	Agree	274	0.68
Wau	Strongly agree	57	0.14
Rubkona	Strongly disagree	7	0.02
Rubkona	Disagree	20	0.05
Rubkona	Neither agree nor disagree	14	0.04
Rubkona	Agree	238	0.60
Rubkona	Strongly agree	121	0.30
Pibor	Strongly disagree	31	0.08
Pibor	Disagree	67	0.16
Pibor	Neither agree nor disagree	76	0.19
Pibor	Agree	193	0.47
Pibor	Strongly agree	39	0.10
Pibor	_2. Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Morobo	Strongly disagree	19	0.05
Morobo	Disagree	46	0.11
Morobo	Neither agree nor disagree	43	0.11
Morobo	Agree	249	0.62
Morobo	Strongly agree	46	0.11
Morobo	_2. Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Malakal	Strongly disagree	1	0.00
Malakal	Disagree	32	0.08
Malakal	Neither agree nor disagree	3	0.01
Malakal	Agree	375	0.89
Malakal	Strongly agree	10	0.02
Lainya	Strongly disagree	24	0.06
Lainya	Disagree	63	0.15
Lainya	Neither agree nor disagree	80	0.19
Lainya	Agree	226	0.55
Lainya	Strongly agree	20	0.05
Lainya	_2. Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Kajo-keji	Strongly disagree	5	0.01
Kajo-keji	Disagree	29	0.07
Kajo-keji	Neither agree nor disagree	45	0.11
Kajo-keji	Agree	207	0.52
Kajo-keji	Strongly agree	105	0.26
Kajo-keji	_2. Prefer not to answer	7	0.02
Bor South	Strongly disagree	3	0.01
Bor South	Disagree	5	0.01
Bor South	Neither agree nor disagree	49	0.11
Bor South	Agree	247	0.58
Bor South	Strongly agree	123	0.29
Bor South	_2. Prefer not to answer	2	0.00

Q6.12.5 The average person in your community would be willing to live next to a person of a different ethnic group.

Entire sample

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
Agree	2382	0.65
Strongly agree	473	0.13
Neither agree nor disagree	420	0.11
Disagree	279	0.08
Strongly disagree	111	0.03
_2. Prefer not to answer	20	0.01

By county

Q1.5_County	Q6.12.5	answers	percentage
Yei	Strongly disagree	1	0.00
Yei	Disagree	19	0.05
Yei	Neither agree nor disagree	68	0.17
Yei	Agree	292	0.71
Yei	Strongly agree	30	0.07
Wau	Strongly disagree	10	0.02
Wau	Disagree	19	0.05
Wau	Neither agree nor disagree	24	0.06
Wau	Agree	295	0.73
Wau	Strongly agree	54	0.13
Rubkona	Strongly disagree	11	0.03
Rubkona	Disagree	31	0.08
Rubkona	Neither agree nor disagree	10	0.03
Rubkona	Agree	234	0.58
Rubkona	Strongly agree	114	0.28
Pibor	Strongly disagree	34	0.08
Pibor	Disagree	53	0.13
Pibor	Neither agree nor disagree	83	0.20
Pibor	Agree	195	0.48
Pibor	Strongly agree	42	0.10
Morobo	Strongly disagree	25	0.06
Morobo	Disagree	40	0.10
Morobo	Neither agree nor disagree	41	0.10
Morobo	Agree	262	0.65
Morobo	Strongly agree	35	0.09
Morobo	_2. Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Malakal	Strongly disagree	1	0.00
Malakal	Disagree	31	0.07
Malakal	Neither agree nor disagree	10	0.02
Malakal	Agree	368	0.87
Malakal	Strongly agree	11	0.03
Lainya	Strongly disagree	14	0.03
Lainya	Disagree	53	0.13
Lainya	Neither agree nor disagree	62	0.15
Lainya	Agree	262	0.63
Lainya	Strongly agree	20	0.05
Lainya	_2. Prefer not to answer	3	0.01
Kajo-keji	Strongly disagree	12	0.03
Kajo-keji	Disagree	26	0.07
Kajo-keji	Neither agree nor disagree	70	0.18
Kajo-keji	Agree	214	0.54
Kajo-keji	Strongly agree	69	0.17
Kajo-keji	_2. Prefer not to answer	7	0.02
Bor South	Strongly disagree	3	0.01
Bor South	Disagree	7	0.02
Bor South	Neither agree nor disagree	52	0.12
Bor South	Agree	260	0.61
Bor South	Strongly agree	98	0.23
Bor South	_2. Prefer not to answer	9	0.02

Societal Issue: Gender Inequality

Q6.13 In your opinion, is it ever acceptable for a man to hit a woman?

Entire sample

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
Never acceptable	2450	0.66
Sometimes acceptable, such as within a relationship, during war, or to protect the family’s honor	843	0.23
Always acceptable	372	0.10
_2. Prefer not to answer	20	0.01

By county

Q1.5_County	Q6.13	answers	percentage
Yei	Never acceptable	310	0.76
Yei	Sometimes acceptable, such as within a relationship, during war, or to protect the family’s honor	90	0.22
Yei	Always acceptable	10	0.02
Wau	Never acceptable	303	0.75
Wau	Sometimes acceptable, such as within a relationship, during war, or to protect the family’s honor	55	0.14
Wau	Always acceptable	39	0.10
Wau	_2. Prefer not to answer	5	0.01
Rubkona	Never acceptable	224	0.56
Rubkona	Sometimes acceptable, such as within a relationship, during war, or to protect the family’s honor	117	0.29
Rubkona	Always acceptable	56	0.14
Rubkona	_2. Prefer not to answer	3	0.01
Pibor	Never acceptable	192	0.47
Pibor	Sometimes acceptable, such as within a relationship, during war, or to protect the family’s honor	122	0.30
Pibor	Always acceptable	90	0.22
Pibor	_2. Prefer not to answer	3	0.01
Morobo	Never acceptable	370	0.92
Morobo	Sometimes acceptable, such as within a relationship, during war, or to protect the family’s honor	27	0.07
Morobo	Always acceptable	7	0.02
Malakal	Never acceptable	147	0.35
Malakal	Sometimes acceptable, such as within a relationship, during war, or to protect the family’s honor	259	0.62
Malakal	Always acceptable	15	0.04
Lainya	Never acceptable	283	0.68
Lainya	Sometimes acceptable, such as within a relationship, during war, or to protect the family’s honor	82	0.20
Lainya	Always acceptable	48	0.12
Lainya	_2. Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Kajo-keji	Never acceptable	339	0.85
Kajo-keji	Sometimes acceptable, such as within a relationship, during war, or to protect the family’s honor	36	0.09
Kajo-keji	Always acceptable	18	0.05
Kajo-keji	_2. Prefer not to answer	5	0.01
Bor South	Never acceptable	282	0.66
Bor South	Sometimes acceptable, such as within a relationship, during war, or to protect the family’s honor	55	0.13
Bor South	Always acceptable	89	0.21
Bor South	_2. Prefer not to answer	3	0.01

By Sex

Q2.1	Q6.13	answers	percentage
Male	Never acceptable	973	0.68
Male	Sometimes acceptable, such as within a relationship, during war, or to protect the family’s honor	305	0.21
Male	Always acceptable	137	0.10
Male	_2. Prefer not to answer	9	0.01
Female	Never acceptable	1477	0.65
Female	Sometimes acceptable, such as within a relationship, during war, or to protect the family’s honor	538	0.24
Female	Always acceptable	235	0.10
Female	_2. Prefer not to answer	11	0.00

Q6.15 The minimum age of marriage according to South Sudan’s laws is 18 years. In your opinion, is it ever acceptable for children to marry before the minimum legal age?

Entire sample

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
Never acceptable	1857	0.50
Sometimes acceptable, such as to resolve a dispute between families, gain money/cows for bride price, or feed one’s household	1266	0.34
Always acceptable	528	0.14
-2. Prefer not to answer	34	0.01

By county

Q1.5_County	Q6.15	answers	percentage
Yei	-2. Prefer not to answer	2	0.00
Yei	Never acceptable	268	0.65
Yei	Sometimes acceptable, such as to resolve a dispute between families, gain money/cows for bride price, or feed one’s household	98	0.24
Yei	Always acceptable	42	0.10
Wau	-2. Prefer not to answer	16	0.04
Wau	Never acceptable	295	0.73
Wau	Sometimes acceptable, such as to resolve a dispute between families, gain money/cows for bride price, or feed one’s household	58	0.14
Wau	Always acceptable	33	0.08
Rubkona	-2. Prefer not to answer	4	0.01
Rubkona	Never acceptable	158	0.40
Rubkona	Sometimes acceptable, such as to resolve a dispute between families, gain money/cows for bride price, or feed one’s household	169	0.42
Rubkona	Always acceptable	69	0.17
Pibor	-2. Prefer not to answer	5	0.01
Pibor	Never acceptable	156	0.38
Pibor	Sometimes acceptable, such as to resolve a dispute between families, gain money/cows for bride price, or feed one’s household	192	0.47
Pibor	Always acceptable	54	0.13
Morobo	-2. Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Morobo	Never acceptable	192	0.48
Morobo	Sometimes acceptable, such as to resolve a dispute between families, gain money/cows for bride price, or feed one’s household	32	0.08
Morobo	Always acceptable	179	0.44
Malakal	Never acceptable	102	0.24
Malakal	Sometimes acceptable, such as to resolve a dispute between families, gain money/cows for bride price, or feed one’s household	307	0.73
Malakal	Always acceptable	12	0.03
Lainya	-2. Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Lainya	Never acceptable	225	0.54
Lainya	Sometimes acceptable, such as to resolve a dispute between families, gain money/cows for bride price, or feed one’s household	141	0.34
Lainya	Always acceptable	47	0.11
Kajo-keji	-2. Prefer not to answer	2	0.01
Kajo-keji	Never acceptable	314	0.79
Kajo-keji	Sometimes acceptable, such as to resolve a dispute between families, gain money/cows for bride price, or feed one’s household	51	0.13
Kajo-keji	Always acceptable	31	0.08
Bor South	-2. Prefer not to answer	3	0.01
Bor South	Never acceptable	147	0.34
Bor South	Sometimes acceptable, such as to resolve a dispute between families, gain money/cows for bride price, or feed one’s household	218	0.51
Bor South	Always acceptable	61	0.14

By Sex

Q2.1	Q6.15	answers	percentage
Male	-2. Prefer not to answer	6	0.00
Male	Never acceptable	782	0.55
Male	Sometimes acceptable, such as to resolve a dispute between families, gain money/cows for bride price, or feed one’s household	435	0.31
Male	Always acceptable	201	0.14
Female	-2. Prefer not to answer	28	0.01
Female	Never acceptable	1075	0.48
Female	Sometimes acceptable, such as to resolve a dispute between families, gain money/cows for bride price, or feed one’s household	831	0.37
Female	Always acceptable	327	0.14

Q7.12 As far as you know, according to South Sudanese law, can a woman own land independently of her husband or any male relative?

Entire sample

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
Yes	2573	0.70
No	1083	0.29
Prefer not to answer	29	0.01

By county

Q1.5_County	Q7.12	answers	percentage
Yei	No	110	0.27
Yei	Yes	300	0.73
Wau	No	17	0.04
Wau	Yes	385	0.96
Rubkona	No	171	0.43
Rubkona	Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Rubkona	Yes	228	0.57
Pibor	No	161	0.40
Pibor	Prefer not to answer	4	0.01
Pibor	Yes	242	0.59
Morobo	No	137	0.34
Morobo	Yes	267	0.66
Malakal	No	33	0.08
Malakal	Yes	388	0.92
Lainya	No	217	0.52
Lainya	Prefer not to answer	16	0.04
Lainya	Yes	181	0.44
Kajo-keji	No	153	0.38
Kajo-keji	Prefer not to answer	3	0.01
Kajo-keji	Yes	242	0.61
Bor South	No	84	0.20
Bor South	Prefer not to answer	5	0.01
Bor South	Yes	340	0.79

By Sex

Q2.1	Q7.12	answers	percentage
Male	No	462	0.32
Male	Prefer not to answer	10	0.01
Male	Yes	952	0.67
Female	No	621	0.27
Female	Prefer not to answer	19	0.01
Female	Yes	1621	0.72

Q7.13 In your opinion, should women be allowed to own land independently of their husbands or male relatives?

Entire sample

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
Yes	2638	0.72
No	1031	0.28
Prefer not to answer	16	0.00

By county

Q1.5_County	Q7.13	answers	percentage
Yei	No	119	0.29
Yei	Yes	291	0.71
Wau	No	30	0.07
Wau	Prefer not to answer	2	0.00
Wau	Yes	370	0.92
Rubkona	No	138	0.34
Rubkona	Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Rubkona	Yes	261	0.65
Pibor	No	182	0.45
Pibor	Prefer not to answer	2	0.00
Pibor	Yes	223	0.55
Morobo	No	114	0.28
Morobo	Yes	290	0.72
Malakal	No	24	0.06
Malakal	Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Malakal	Yes	396	0.94
Lainya	No	221	0.53
Lainya	Prefer not to answer	3	0.01
Lainya	Yes	190	0.46
Kajo-keji	No	157	0.39
Kajo-keji	Prefer not to answer	3	0.01
Kajo-keji	Yes	238	0.60
Bor South	No	46	0.11
Bor South	Prefer not to answer	4	0.01
Bor South	Yes	379	0.88

By Sex

Q2.1	Q7.13	answers	percentage
Male	No	449	0.32
Male	Prefer not to answer	4	0.00
Male	Yes	971	0.68
Female	No	582	0.26
Female	Prefer not to answer	12	0.01
Female	Yes	1667	0.74

Q10.4 In your opinion, should women be allowed to own land independently of their husbands or male relatives?

Entire sample

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
Yes	2672	0.73
No	976	0.26
Prefer not to answer	37	0.01

By county

Q1.5_County	Q10.4	answers	percentage
Yei	No	86	0.21
Yei	Yes	324	0.79
Wau	No	47	0.12
Wau	Prefer not to answer	5	0.01
Wau	Yes	350	0.87
Rubkona	No	74	0.18
Rubkona	Yes	326	0.81
Pibor	No	150	0.37
Pibor	Prefer not to answer	8	0.02
Pibor	Yes	249	0.61
Morobo	No	139	0.34
Morobo	Yes	265	0.66
Malakal	No	119	0.28
Malakal	Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Malakal	Yes	301	0.71
Lainya	No	193	0.47
Lainya	Prefer not to answer	4	0.01
Lainya	Yes	217	0.52
Kajo-keji	No	152	0.38
Kajo-keji	Prefer not to answer	13	0.03
Kajo-keji	Yes	233	0.59
Bor South	No	16	0.04
Bor South	Prefer not to answer	6	0.01
Bor South	Yes	407	0.95

By Sex

Q2.1	Q10.4	answers	percentage
Male	No	417	0.29
Male	Prefer not to answer	13	0.01
Male	Yes	994	0.70
Female	No	559	0.25
Female	Prefer not to answer	24	0.01
Female	Yes	1678	0.74

Q10.5 South Sudan’s 2011 constitution requires a 35% quota for women’s representation across government institutions. Which of the following most accurately reflects your opinion on this quota?

Entire sample

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
I support the 35% quota for women	2121	0.58
The quota is too low (not enough women) and should be increased	1250	0.34
The quota is too high (too many women) and should be decreased	215	0.06
There should be no gender quota at all	74	0.02
Prefer not to answer	25	0.01

By county

Q1.5_County	Q10.5	answers	percentage
Yei	I support the 35% quota for women	255	0.62
Yei	Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Yei	The quota is too high (too many women) and should be decreased	33	0.08
Yei	The quota is too low (not enough women) and should be increased	119	0.29
Yei	There should be no gender quota at all	2	0.00
Wau	I support the 35% quota for women	184	0.46
Wau	Prefer not to answer	5	0.01
Wau	The quota is too high (too many women) and should be decreased	14	0.03
Wau	The quota is too low (not enough women) and should be increased	193	0.48
Wau	There should be no gender quota at all	6	0.01
Rubkona	I support the 35% quota for women	218	0.54
Rubkona	Prefer not to answer	2	0.00
Rubkona	The quota is too high (too many women) and should be decreased	5	0.01
Rubkona	The quota is too low (not enough women) and should be increased	164	0.41
Rubkona	There should be no gender quota at all	11	0.03
Pibor	I support the 35% quota for women	168	0.41
Pibor	Prefer not to answer	4	0.01
Pibor	The quota is too high (too many women) and should be decreased	50	0.12
Pibor	The quota is too low (not enough women) and should be increased	165	0.41
Pibor	There should be no gender quota at all	20	0.05
Morobo	I support the 35% quota for women	269	0.67
Morobo	The quota is too high (too many women) and should be decreased	34	0.08
Morobo	The quota is too low (not enough women) and should be increased	92	0.23
Morobo	There should be no gender quota at all	9	0.02
Malakal	I support the 35% quota for women	214	0.51
Malakal	The quota is too high (too many women) and should be decreased	16	0.04
Malakal	The quota is too low (not enough women) and should be increased	190	0.45
Malakal	There should be no gender quota at all	1	0.00
Lainya	I support the 35% quota for women	293	0.71
Lainya	The quota is too high (too many women) and should be decreased	43	0.10
Lainya	The quota is too low (not enough women) and should be increased	67	0.16
Lainya	There should be no gender quota at all	11	0.03
Kajo-keji	I support the 35% quota for women	239	0.60
Kajo-keji	Prefer not to answer	12	0.03
Kajo-keji	The quota is too high (too many women) and should be decreased	12	0.03
Kajo-keji	The quota is too low (not enough women) and should be increased	135	0.34
Bor South	I support the 35% quota for women	281	0.66
Bor South	Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Bor South	The quota is too high (too many women) and should be decreased	8	0.02
Bor South	The quota is too low (not enough women) and should be increased	125	0.29
Bor South	There should be no gender quota at all	14	0.03

By Sex

Q2.1	Q10.5	answers	percentage
Male	I support the 35% quota for women	899	0.63
Male	Prefer not to answer	11	0.01
Male	The quota is too high (too many women) and should be decreased	93	0.07
Male	The quota is too low (not enough women) and should be increased	391	0.27
Male	There should be no gender quota at all	30	0.02
Female	I support the 35% quota for women	1222	0.54
Female	Prefer not to answer	14	0.01
Female	The quota is too high (too many women) and should be decreased	122	0.05
Female	The quota is too low (not enough women) and should be increased	859	0.38
Female	There should be no gender quota at all	44	0.02

Societal Issue: Housing, Land & Property (HLP)

Q7.3 What is the nature of the house/property in which you live?

Entire sample

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
Owned	2901	0.79
Rented - informal agreement with an individual	215	0.06
Taken without owner permission / occupied (Skip to 7.8)	203	0.06
Rented - formal agreement with an individual	197	0.05
Other (Specify):	91	0.02
Rented from the authorities	70	0.02
_2. Prefer not to answer	8	0.00

By county

Q1.5_County	Q7.3	answers	percentage
Yei	Owned	365	0.89
Yei	Rented - formal agreement with an individual	25	0.06
Yei	Rented - informal agreement with an individual	7	0.02
Yei	Taken without owner permission / occupied (Skip to 7.8)	11	0.03
Yei	Other (Specify):	2	0.00
Wau	Owned	269	0.67
Wau	Rented - formal agreement with an individual	48	0.12
Wau	Rented - informal agreement with an individual	49	0.12
Wau	Rented from the authorities	6	0.01
Wau	Taken without owner permission / occupied (Skip to 7.8)	2	0.00
Wau	Other (Specify):	23	0.06
Wau	_2. Prefer not to answer	5	0.01
Rubkona	Owned	302	0.76
Rubkona	Rented - formal agreement with an individual	12	0.03
Rubkona	Rented - informal agreement with an individual	13	0.03
Rubkona	Rented from the authorities	31	0.08
Rubkona	Taken without owner permission / occupied (Skip to 7.8)	38	0.10
Rubkona	Other (Specify):	3	0.01
Rubkona	_2. Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Pibor	Owned	328	0.81
Pibor	Rented - formal agreement with an individual	12	0.03
Pibor	Rented - informal agreement with an individual	6	0.01
Pibor	Rented from the authorities	2	0.00
Pibor	Taken without owner permission / occupied (Skip to 7.8)	4	0.01
Pibor	Other (Specify):	55	0.14
Morobo	Owned	361	0.89
Morobo	Rented - formal agreement with an individual	13	0.03
Morobo	Rented - informal agreement with an individual	18	0.04
Morobo	Rented from the authorities	5	0.01
Morobo	Taken without owner permission / occupied (Skip to 7.8)	4	0.01
Morobo	Other (Specify):	3	0.01
Malakal	Owned	221	0.52
Malakal	Rented - formal agreement with an individual	60	0.14
Malakal	Rented - informal agreement with an individual	65	0.15
Malakal	Rented from the authorities	20	0.05
Malakal	Taken without owner permission / occupied (Skip to 7.8)	55	0.13
Lainya	Owned	313	0.76
Lainya	Rented - formal agreement with an individual	19	0.05
Lainya	Rented - informal agreement with an individual	39	0.09
Lainya	Rented from the authorities	5	0.01
Lainya	Taken without owner permission / occupied (Skip to 7.8)	33	0.08
Lainya	Other (Specify):	3	0.01
Lainya	_2. Prefer not to answer	2	0.00
Kajo-keji	Owned	361	0.91
Kajo-keji	Rented - formal agreement with an individual	1	0.00
Kajo-keji	Rented - informal agreement with an individual	12	0.03
Kajo-keji	Rented from the authorities	1	0.00
Kajo-keji	Taken without owner permission / occupied (Skip to 7.8)	23	0.06
Bor South	Owned	381	0.89
Bor South	Rented - formal agreement with an individual	7	0.02
Bor South	Rented - informal agreement with an individual	6	0.01
Bor South	Taken without owner permission / occupied (Skip to 7.8)	33	0.08
Bor South	Other (Specify):	2	0.00

Q7.4 Do you possess ownership documents for your house?

Entire sample

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
No	1869	0.51
Yes	1031	0.28
NA	784	0.21
Prefer not to answer	1	0.00

By county

Q1.5_County	Q7.4	answers	percentage
Yei	No	285	0.70
Yei	Yes	80	0.20
Yei	NA	45	0.11
Wau	No	73	0.18
Wau	Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Wau	Yes	195	0.49
Wau	NA	133	0.33
Rubkona	No	162	0.41
Rubkona	Yes	140	0.35
Rubkona	NA	98	0.24
Pibor	No	243	0.60
Pibor	Yes	85	0.21
Pibor	NA	79	0.19
Morobo	No	296	0.73
Morobo	Yes	65	0.16
Morobo	NA	43	0.11
Malakal	No	124	0.29
Malakal	Yes	97	0.23
Malakal	NA	200	0.48
Lainya	No	214	0.52
Lainya	Yes	99	0.24
Lainya	NA	101	0.24
Kajo-keji	No	209	0.53
Kajo-keji	Yes	152	0.38
Kajo-keji	NA	37	0.09
Bor South	No	263	0.61
Bor South	Yes	118	0.28
Bor South	NA	48	0.11

Q7.8 Have you heard about the following issues related to house, land and property happening in your community?

Q7.8.1 Boundary dispute

Entire sample

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
No	2423	0.66
Yes	1255	0.34
Prefer not to answer	7	0.00

By county

Q1.5_County	Q7.8.1	answers	percentage
Yei	No	292	0.71
Yei	Yes	118	0.29
Wau	No	338	0.84
Wau	Prefer not to answer	3	0.01
Wau	Yes	61	0.15
Rubkona	No	244	0.61
Rubkona	Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Rubkona	Yes	155	0.39
Pibor	No	268	0.66
Pibor	Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Pibor	Yes	138	0.34
Morobo	No	221	0.55
Morobo	Yes	183	0.45
Malakal	No	299	0.71
Malakal	Yes	122	0.29
Lainya	No	247	0.60
Lainya	Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Lainya	Yes	166	0.40
Kajo-keji	No	293	0.74
Kajo-keji	Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Kajo-keji	Yes	104	0.26
Bor South	No	221	0.52
Bor South	Yes	208	0.48

Q7.8.2 Land grabbing

Entire sample

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
No	2457	0.67
Yes	1220	0.33
Prefer not to answer	8	0.00

By county

Q1.5_County	Q7.8.2	answers	percentage
Yei	No	272	0.66
Yei	Yes	138	0.34
Wau	No	328	0.82
Wau	Prefer not to answer	3	0.01
Wau	Yes	71	0.18
Rubkona	No	244	0.61
Rubkona	Yes	156	0.39
Pibor	No	285	0.70
Pibor	Prefer not to answer	4	0.01
Pibor	Yes	118	0.29
Morobo	No	216	0.53
Morobo	Yes	188	0.47
Malakal	No	282	0.67
Malakal	Yes	139	0.33
Lainya	No	264	0.64
Lainya	Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Lainya	Yes	149	0.36
Kajo-keji	No	327	0.82
Kajo-keji	Yes	71	0.18
Bor South	No	239	0.56
Bor South	Yes	190	0.44

Q7.8.3 Secondary occupation

Entire sample

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
No	2611	0.71
Yes	1062	0.29
Prefer not to answer	12	0.00

By county

Q1.5_County	Q7.8.3	answers	percentage
Yei	No	347	0.85
Yei	Yes	63	0.15
Wau	No	329	0.82
Wau	Prefer not to answer	6	0.01
Wau	Yes	67	0.17
Rubkona	No	258	0.64
Rubkona	Yes	142	0.36
Pibor	No	330	0.81
Pibor	Prefer not to answer	3	0.01
Pibor	Yes	74	0.18
Morobo	No	254	0.63
Morobo	Yes	150	0.37
Malakal	No	295	0.70
Malakal	Yes	126	0.30
Lainya	No	277	0.67
Lainya	Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Lainya	Yes	136	0.33
Kajo-keji	No	354	0.89
Kajo-keji	Prefer not to answer	2	0.01
Kajo-keji	Yes	42	0.11
Bor South	No	167	0.39
Bor South	Yes	262	0.61

Q7.8.4 Multiple land title claim

Entire sample

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
No	2663	0.72
Yes	1002	0.27
Prefer not to answer	20	0.01

By county

Q1.5_County	Q7.8.4	answers	percentage
Yei	No	318	0.78
Yei	Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Yei	Yes	91	0.22
Wau	No	330	0.82
Wau	Prefer not to answer	7	0.02
Wau	Yes	65	0.16
Rubkona	No	248	0.62
Rubkona	Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Rubkona	Yes	151	0.38
Pibor	No	323	0.79
Pibor	Prefer not to answer	6	0.01
Pibor	Yes	78	0.19
Morobo	No	271	0.67
Morobo	Yes	133	0.33
Malakal	No	284	0.67
Malakal	Prefer not to answer	2	0.00
Malakal	Yes	135	0.32
Lainya	No	263	0.64
Lainya	Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Lainya	Yes	150	0.36
Kajo-keji	No	366	0.92
Kajo-keji	Prefer not to answer	2	0.01
Kajo-keji	Yes	30	0.08
Bor South	No	260	0.61
Bor South	Yes	169	0.39

Q7.8.5 Agrarian versus livestock farming conflicts

Entire sample

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
No	2194	0.60
Yes	1454	0.39
Prefer not to answer	37	0.01

By county

Q1.5_County	Q7.8.5	answers	percentage
Yei	No	128	0.31
Yei	Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Yei	Yes	281	0.69
Wau	No	299	0.74
Wau	Prefer not to answer	22	0.05
Wau	Yes	81	0.20
Rubkona	No	248	0.62
Rubkona	Yes	152	0.38
Pibor	No	310	0.76
Pibor	Prefer not to answer	6	0.01
Pibor	Yes	91	0.22
Morobo	No	255	0.63
Morobo	Yes	149	0.37
Malakal	No	287	0.68
Malakal	Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Malakal	Yes	133	0.32
Lainya	No	176	0.43
Lainya	Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Lainya	Yes	237	0.57
Kajo-keji	No	330	0.83
Kajo-keji	Prefer not to answer	2	0.01
Kajo-keji	Yes	66	0.17
Bor South	No	161	0.38
Bor South	Prefer not to answer	4	0.01
Bor South	Yes	264	0.62

7) Security Fragility

All the answers are in a *scale of 0-1**, i.e. can have the following values: 0, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1. The higher, the more fragile.

The higher, the more fragile.

Index Questions

Q8.5.2: On a scale from 1 to 5, where 1 means “very unfrightened” and 5 means “very frightened,” how afraid are you of violent crime in your community

Entire sample

mean
0.63

Q8.5.2_raw	answers	percentage
Frightened	1753	0.48
Neither frightened nor unfrightened	396	0.11
Prefer not to respond	34	0.01
Unfrightened	639	0.17
Very frightened	644	0.17
Very unfrightened	219	0.06

By county

County	Mean Response (0 to 1)
Bor South	0.75
Kajo-keji	0.58
Lainya	0.62
Malakal	0.65
Morobo	0.62
Pibor	0.64
Rubkona	0.57
Wau	0.71
Yei	0.56

Q1.5_County	Q8.5.2_raw	answers	percentage
Yei	Frightened	189	0.46
Yei	Neither frightened nor unfrightened	62	0.15
Yei	Unfrightened	112	0.27
Yei	Very frightened	29	0.07
Yei	Very unfrightened	18	0.04
Wau	Frightened	190	0.47
Wau	Neither frightened nor unfrightened	44	0.11
Wau	Prefer not to respond	1	0.00
Wau	Unfrightened	61	0.15
Wau	Very frightened	103	0.26
Wau	Very unfrightened	3	0.01
Rubkona	Frightened	156	0.39
Rubkona	Neither frightened nor unfrightened	24	0.06
Rubkona	Unfrightened	32	0.08
Rubkona	Very frightened	91	0.23
Rubkona	Very unfrightened	97	0.24
Pibor	Frightened	225	0.55
Pibor	Neither frightened nor unfrightened	68	0.17
Pibor	Prefer not to respond	1	0.00
Pibor	Unfrightened	55	0.14
Pibor	Very frightened	44	0.11
Pibor	Very unfrightened	14	0.03
Morobo	Frightened	185	0.46
Morobo	Neither frightened nor unfrightened	23	0.06
Morobo	Unfrightened	73	0.18
Morobo	Very frightened	84	0.21
Morobo	Very unfrightened	39	0.10
Malakal	Frightened	241	0.57
Malakal	Neither frightened nor unfrightened	15	0.04
Malakal	Unfrightened	100	0.24
Malakal	Very frightened	59	0.14
Malakal	Very unfrightened	6	0.01
Lainya	Frightened	209	0.50
Lainya	Neither frightened nor unfrightened	75	0.18
Lainya	Prefer not to respond	2	0.00
Lainya	Unfrightened	65	0.16
Lainya	Very frightened	45	0.11
Lainya	Very unfrightened	18	0.04
Kajo-keji	Frightened	167	0.42
Kajo-keji	Neither frightened nor unfrightened	36	0.09
Kajo-keji	Prefer not to respond	30	0.08
Kajo-keji	Unfrightened	106	0.27
Kajo-keji	Very frightened	45	0.11
Kajo-keji	Very unfrightened	14	0.04
Bor South	Frightened	191	0.45
Bor South	Neither frightened nor unfrightened	49	0.11
Bor South	Unfrightened	35	0.08
Bor South	Very frightened	144	0.34
Bor South	Very unfrightened	10	0.02

Q8.5.3: On a scale from 1 to 5, where 1 means “very unfrightened” and 5 means “very frightened,” how afraid are you of armed conflict/war happening in your community?

Entire sample

mean
0.63

Q8.5.3_raw	answers	percentage
Frightened	1610	0.44
Very frightened	1007	0.27
Unfrightened	479	0.13
Neither frightened nor unfrightened	311	0.08
Very unfrightened	241	0.07
Prefer not to respond	37	0.01

By county

County	Mean Response (0 to 1)
Bor South	0.86
Kajo-keji	0.64
Lainya	0.67
Malakal	0.63
Morobo	0.66
Pibor	0.68
Rubkona	0.60
Wau	0.78
Yei	0.60

Q1.5_County	Q8.5.3_raw	answers	percentage
Yei	Frightened	207	0.50
Yei	Neither frightened nor unfrightened	50	0.12
Yei	Unfrightened	79	0.19
Yei	Very frightened	46	0.11
Yei	Very unfrightened	28	0.07
Wau	Frightened	184	0.46
Wau	Neither frightened nor unfrightened	23	0.06
Wau	Prefer not to respond	2	0.00
Wau	Unfrightened	35	0.09
Wau	Very frightened	153	0.38
Wau	Very unfrightened	5	0.01
Rubkona	Frightened	160	0.40
Rubkona	Neither frightened nor unfrightened	15	0.04
Rubkona	Unfrightened	25	0.06
Rubkona	Very frightened	108	0.27
Rubkona	Very unfrightened	92	0.23
Pibor	Frightened	248	0.61
Pibor	Neither frightened nor unfrightened	53	0.13
Pibor	Unfrightened	33	0.08
Pibor	Very frightened	58	0.14
Pibor	Very unfrightened	15	0.04
Morobo	Frightened	148	0.37
Morobo	Neither frightened nor unfrightened	29	0.07
Morobo	Unfrightened	69	0.17
Morobo	Very frightened	123	0.30
Morobo	Very unfrightened	35	0.09
Malakal	Frightened	250	0.59
Malakal	Neither frightened nor unfrightened	16	0.04
Malakal	Unfrightened	107	0.25
Malakal	Very frightened	45	0.11
Malakal	Very unfrightened	3	0.01
Lainya	Frightened	119	0.29
Lainya	Neither frightened nor unfrightened	68	0.16
Lainya	Prefer not to respond	3	0.01
Lainya	Unfrightened	50	0.12
Lainya	Very frightened	141	0.34
Lainya	Very unfrightened	33	0.08
Kajo-keji	Frightened	183	0.46
Kajo-keji	Neither frightened nor unfrightened	34	0.09
Kajo-keji	Prefer not to respond	32	0.08
Kajo-keji	Unfrightened	69	0.17
Kajo-keji	Very frightened	61	0.15
Kajo-keji	Very unfrightened	19	0.05
Bor South	Frightened	111	0.26
Bor South	Neither frightened nor unfrightened	23	0.05
Bor South	Unfrightened	12	0.03
Bor South	Very frightened	272	0.63
Bor South	Very unfrightened	11	0.03

Q8.5.3: On a scale from 1 to 5, where 1 means “very unfrightened” and 5 means “very frightened,” how afraid are you of land conflicts happening in your community?

Entire sample

mean
0.58

Q8.5.7_raw	answers	percentage
Frightened	1490	0.40
Unfrightened	828	0.22
Very frightened	571	0.15
Neither frightened nor unfrightened	418	0.11
Very unfrightened	325	0.09
Prefer not to respond	53	0.01

By county

County	Mean Response (0 to 1)
Bor South	0.62
Kajo-keji	0.55
Lainya	0.60
Malakal	0.55
Morobo	0.57
Pibor	0.59
Rubkona	0.59
Wau	0.70
Yei	0.44

Q1.5_County	Q8.5.7_raw	answers	percentage
Yei	Frightened	130	0.32
Yei	Neither frightened nor unfrightened	66	0.16
Yei	Prefer not to respond	1	0.00
Yei	Unfrightened	139	0.34
Yei	Very frightened	15	0.04
Yei	Very unfrightened	59	0.14
Wau	Frightened	219	0.54
Wau	Neither frightened nor unfrightened	39	0.10
Wau	Prefer not to respond	6	0.01
Wau	Unfrightened	54	0.13
Wau	Very frightened	78	0.19
Wau	Very unfrightened	6	0.01
Rubkona	Frightened	148	0.37
Rubkona	Neither frightened nor unfrightened	20	0.05
Rubkona	Prefer not to respond	1	0.00
Rubkona	Unfrightened	37	0.09
Rubkona	Very frightened	105	0.26
Rubkona	Very unfrightened	89	0.22
Pibor	Frightened	185	0.45
Pibor	Neither frightened nor unfrightened	71	0.17
Pibor	Prefer not to respond	1	0.00
Pibor	Unfrightened	85	0.21
Pibor	Very frightened	43	0.11
Pibor	Very unfrightened	22	0.05
Morobo	Frightened	146	0.36
Morobo	Neither frightened nor unfrightened	26	0.06
Morobo	Prefer not to respond	1	0.00
Morobo	Unfrightened	88	0.22
Morobo	Very frightened	86	0.21
Morobo	Very unfrightened	57	0.14
Malakal	Frightened	198	0.47
Malakal	Neither frightened nor unfrightened	23	0.05
Malakal	Unfrightened	167	0.40
Malakal	Very frightened	31	0.07
Malakal	Very unfrightened	2	0.00
Lainya	Frightened	140	0.34
Lainya	Neither frightened nor unfrightened	89	0.21
Lainya	Prefer not to respond	8	0.02
Lainya	Unfrightened	71	0.17
Lainya	Very frightened	76	0.18
Lainya	Very unfrightened	30	0.07
Kajo-keji	Frightened	156	0.39
Kajo-keji	Neither frightened nor unfrightened	43	0.11
Kajo-keji	Prefer not to respond	35	0.09
Kajo-keji	Unfrightened	103	0.26
Kajo-keji	Very frightened	37	0.09
Kajo-keji	Very unfrightened	24	0.06
Bor South	Frightened	168	0.39
Bor South	Neither frightened nor unfrightened	41	0.10
Bor South	Unfrightened	84	0.20
Bor South	Very frightened	100	0.23
Bor South	Very unfrightened	36	0.08

Q8.5.8: On a scale from 1 to 5, where 1 means “very unfrightened” and 5 means “very frightened,” how afraid are you of conflicts over cattle happening in your community?

Entire sample

mean
0.63

Q8.5.8_raw	answers	percentage
Frightened	1526	0.41
Very frightened	774	0.21
Unfrightened	625	0.17
Neither frightened nor unfrightened	379	0.10
Very unfrightened	306	0.08
Prefer not to respond	75	0.02

By county

County	Mean Response (0 to 1)
Bor South	0.82
Kajo-keji	0.62
Lainya	0.66
Malakal	0.54
Morobo	0.48
Pibor	0.61
Rubkona	0.62
Wau	0.77
Yei	0.53

Q1.5_County	Q8.5.8_raw	answers	percentage
Yei	Frightened	153	0.37
Yei	Neither frightened nor unfrightened	98	0.24
Yei	Prefer not to respond	2	0.00
Yei	Unfrightened	94	0.23
Yei	Very frightened	28	0.07
Yei	Very unfrightened	35	0.09
Wau	Frightened	204	0.51
Wau	Neither frightened nor unfrightened	25	0.06
Wau	Prefer not to respond	17	0.04
Wau	Unfrightened	25	0.06
Wau	Very frightened	125	0.31
Wau	Very unfrightened	6	0.01
Rubkona	Frightened	164	0.41
Rubkona	Neither frightened nor unfrightened	19	0.05
Rubkona	Unfrightened	18	0.04
Rubkona	Very frightened	112	0.28
Rubkona	Very unfrightened	87	0.22
Pibor	Frightened	222	0.55
Pibor	Neither frightened nor unfrightened	62	0.15
Pibor	Prefer not to respond	1	0.00
Pibor	Unfrightened	62	0.15
Pibor	Very frightened	35	0.09
Pibor	Very unfrightened	25	0.06
Morobo	Frightened	126	0.31
Morobo	Neither frightened nor unfrightened	21	0.05
Morobo	Prefer not to respond	2	0.00
Morobo	Unfrightened	109	0.27
Morobo	Very frightened	60	0.15
Morobo	Very unfrightened	86	0.21
Malakal	Frightened	190	0.45
Malakal	Neither frightened nor unfrightened	24	0.06
Malakal	Unfrightened	173	0.41
Malakal	Very frightened	31	0.07
Malakal	Very unfrightened	3	0.01
Lainya	Frightened	128	0.31
Lainya	Neither frightened nor unfrightened	76	0.18
Lainya	Prefer not to respond	6	0.01
Lainya	Unfrightened	54	0.13
Lainya	Very frightened	120	0.29
Lainya	Very unfrightened	30	0.07
Kajo-keji	Frightened	160	0.40
Kajo-keji	Neither frightened nor unfrightened	30	0.08
Kajo-keji	Prefer not to respond	39	0.10
Kajo-keji	Unfrightened	72	0.18
Kajo-keji	Very frightened	70	0.18
Kajo-keji	Very unfrightened	27	0.07
Bor South	Frightened	179	0.42
Bor South	Neither frightened nor unfrightened	24	0.06
Bor South	Prefer not to respond	8	0.02
Bor South	Unfrightened	18	0.04
Bor South	Very frightened	193	0.45
Bor South	Very unfrightened	7	0.02

Q8.5.9: On a scale from 1 to 5, where 1 means “very unfrightened” and 5 means “very frightened,” how afraid are you of violence involving community-based militias, vigilante groups, or self-defense groups happening in your community?

Entire sample

mean
0.62

Q8.5.9_raw	answers	percentage
Frightened	1662	0.45
Unfrightened	632	0.17
Very frightened	602	0.16
Neither frightened nor unfrightened	468	0.13
Very unfrightened	277	0.08
Prefer not to respond	44	0.01

By county

County	Mean Response (0 to 1)
Bor South	0.78
Kajo-keji	0.58
Lainya	0.59
Malakal	0.57
Morobo	0.54
Pibor	0.67
Rubkona	0.58
Wau	0.68
Yei	0.53

Q1.5_County	Q8.5.9_raw	answers	percentage
Yei	Frightened	194	0.47
Yei	Neither frightened nor unfrightened	88	0.21
Yei	Unfrightened	88	0.21
Yei	Very frightened	7	0.02
Yei	Very unfrightened	33	0.08
Wau	Frightened	217	0.54
Wau	Neither frightened nor unfrightened	75	0.19
Wau	Prefer not to respond	1	0.00
Wau	Unfrightened	39	0.10
Wau	Very frightened	64	0.16
Wau	Very unfrightened	6	0.01
Rubkona	Frightened	162	0.41
Rubkona	Neither frightened nor unfrightened	20	0.05
Rubkona	Prefer not to respond	1	0.00
Rubkona	Unfrightened	35	0.09
Rubkona	Very frightened	91	0.23
Rubkona	Very unfrightened	91	0.23
Pibor	Frightened	228	0.56
Pibor	Neither frightened nor unfrightened	66	0.16
Pibor	Prefer not to respond	1	0.00
Pibor	Unfrightened	37	0.09
Pibor	Very frightened	57	0.14
Pibor	Very unfrightened	18	0.04
Morobo	Frightened	138	0.34
Morobo	Neither frightened nor unfrightened	42	0.10
Morobo	Prefer not to respond	2	0.00
Morobo	Unfrightened	94	0.23
Morobo	Very frightened	70	0.17
Morobo	Very unfrightened	58	0.14
Malakal	Frightened	219	0.52
Malakal	Neither frightened nor unfrightened	29	0.07
Malakal	Unfrightened	146	0.35
Malakal	Very frightened	24	0.06
Malakal	Very unfrightened	3	0.01
Lainya	Frightened	166	0.40
Lainya	Neither frightened nor unfrightened	81	0.20
Lainya	Prefer not to respond	2	0.00
Lainya	Unfrightened	68	0.16
Lainya	Very frightened	62	0.15
Lainya	Very unfrightened	35	0.08
Kajo-keji	Frightened	172	0.43
Kajo-keji	Neither frightened nor unfrightened	33	0.08
Kajo-keji	Prefer not to respond	37	0.09
Kajo-keji	Unfrightened	89	0.22
Kajo-keji	Very frightened	42	0.11
Kajo-keji	Very unfrightened	25	0.06
Bor South	Frightened	166	0.39
Bor South	Neither frightened nor unfrightened	34	0.08
Bor South	Unfrightened	36	0.08
Bor South	Very frightened	185	0.43
Bor South	Very unfrightened	8	0.02

Additional Questions

Q8.1 How safe do you feel in your community?

Entire sample

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
Very safe	1565	0.42
10 Very safe	744	0.20
Very likely	348	0.09
Very satisfied	216	0.06
Very unsafe	199	0.05
Very unlikely	182	0.05
Very important	170	0.05
Very dissatisfied	153	0.04
Very unimportant	104	0.03
-2 Prefer not to answer	4	0.00

By county

Q1.5_County	Q8.1	answers	percentage
Yei	Very unsafe	14	0.03
Yei	10 Very safe	51	0.12
Yei	Very dissatisfied	16	0.04
Yei	Very unimportant	9	0.02
Yei	Very unlikely	27	0.07
Yei	Very safe	213	0.52
Yei	Very important	31	0.08
Yei	Very likely	37	0.09
Yei	Very satisfied	12	0.03
Wau	Very unsafe	9	0.02
Wau	10 Very safe	65	0.16
Wau	Very dissatisfied	3	0.01
Wau	Very unimportant	3	0.01
Wau	Very unlikely	21	0.05
Wau	Very safe	185	0.46
Wau	Very important	22	0.05
Wau	Very likely	50	0.12
Wau	Very satisfied	44	0.11
Rubkona	-2 Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Rubkona	Very unsafe	15	0.04
Rubkona	10 Very safe	109	0.27
Rubkona	Very dissatisfied	12	0.03
Rubkona	Very unimportant	3	0.01
Rubkona	Very unlikely	6	0.01
Rubkona	Very safe	184	0.46
Rubkona	Very important	22	0.06
Rubkona	Very likely	29	0.07
Rubkona	Very satisfied	19	0.05
Pibor	-2 Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Pibor	Very unsafe	17	0.04
Pibor	10 Very safe	10	0.02
Pibor	Very dissatisfied	52	0.13
Pibor	Very unimportant	60	0.15
Pibor	Very unlikely	41	0.10
Pibor	Very safe	159	0.39
Pibor	Very important	22	0.05
Pibor	Very likely	33	0.08
Pibor	Very satisfied	12	0.03
Morobo	Very unsafe	10	0.02
Morobo	10 Very safe	122	0.30
Morobo	Very dissatisfied	15	0.04
Morobo	Very unimportant	9	0.02
Morobo	Very unlikely	15	0.04
Morobo	Very safe	160	0.40
Morobo	Very important	17	0.04
Morobo	Very likely	27	0.07
Morobo	Very satisfied	29	0.07
Malakal	-2 Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Malakal	Very unsafe	8	0.02
Malakal	10 Very safe	63	0.15
Malakal	Very dissatisfied	1	0.00
Malakal	Very unimportant	1	0.00
Malakal	Very unlikely	5	0.01
Malakal	Very safe	267	0.63
Malakal	Very important	13	0.03
Malakal	Very likely	51	0.12
Malakal	Very satisfied	11	0.03
Lainya	Very unsafe	41	0.10
Lainya	10 Very safe	75	0.18
Lainya	Very dissatisfied	32	0.08
Lainya	Very unimportant	12	0.03
Lainya	Very unlikely	18	0.04
Lainya	Very safe	144	0.35
Lainya	Very important	21	0.05
Lainya	Very likely	38	0.09
Lainya	Very satisfied	33	0.08
Kajo-keji	Very unsafe	17	0.04
Kajo-keji	10 Very safe	158	0.40
Kajo-keji	Very dissatisfied	17	0.04
Kajo-keji	Very unimportant	6	0.02
Kajo-keji	Very unlikely	10	0.03
Kajo-keji	Very safe	107	0.27
Kajo-keji	Very important	9	0.02
Kajo-keji	Very likely	52	0.13
Kajo-keji	Very satisfied	22	0.06
Bor South	-2 Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Bor South	Very unsafe	68	0.16
Bor South	10 Very safe	91	0.21
Bor South	Very dissatisfied	5	0.01
Bor South	Very unimportant	1	0.00
Bor South	Very unlikely	39	0.09
Bor South	Very safe	146	0.34
Bor South	Very important	13	0.03
Bor South	Very likely	31	0.07
Bor South	Very satisfied	34	0.08

Q8.2 Compared to 12 months ago, do you feel that the safety in the community has improved, there has been no change, or the safety in the community has worsened?

Entire sample

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
The safety in the community has improved	2559	0.69
No change	766	0.21
The safety in the community has worsened	272	0.07
_2 Prefer not to answer	88	0.02

By county

Q1.5_County	Q8.2	answers	percentage
Yei	The safety in the community has improved	354	0.86
Yei	No change	47	0.11
Yei	The safety in the community has worsened	4	0.01
Yei	_2 Prefer not to answer	5	0.01
Wau	The safety in the community has improved	244	0.61
Wau	No change	73	0.18
Wau	The safety in the community has worsened	60	0.15
Wau	_2 Prefer not to answer	25	0.06
Rubkona	The safety in the community has improved	301	0.75
Rubkona	No change	74	0.18
Rubkona	The safety in the community has worsened	22	0.06
Rubkona	_2 Prefer not to answer	3	0.01
Pibor	The safety in the community has improved	198	0.49
Pibor	No change	125	0.31
Pibor	The safety in the community has worsened	82	0.20
Pibor	_2 Prefer not to answer	2	0.00
Morobo	The safety in the community has improved	353	0.87
Morobo	No change	34	0.08
Morobo	The safety in the community has worsened	17	0.04
Malakal	The safety in the community has improved	272	0.65
Malakal	No change	110	0.26
Malakal	The safety in the community has worsened	22	0.05
Malakal	_2 Prefer not to answer	17	0.04
Lainya	The safety in the community has improved	313	0.76
Lainya	No change	75	0.18
Lainya	The safety in the community has worsened	16	0.04
Lainya	_2 Prefer not to answer	10	0.02
Kajo-keji	The safety in the community has improved	348	0.87
Kajo-keji	No change	32	0.08
Kajo-keji	The safety in the community has worsened	5	0.01
Kajo-keji	_2 Prefer not to answer	13	0.03
Bor South	The safety in the community has improved	176	0.41
Bor South	No change	196	0.46
Bor South	The safety in the community has worsened	44	0.10
Bor South	_2 Prefer not to answer	13	0.03

Q8.4 On a scale from 1 through 5, where 1 is “strongly disagree” and 5 is “strongly agree,” how much do you agree with the following statements?

Q8.4.1 I am comfortable walking around my neighborhood during the day

Entire sample

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
Agree	2420	0.66
Strongly agree	853	0.23
Neither agree nor disagree	189	0.05
Disagree	141	0.04
Strongly disagree	78	0.02
_2. Prefer not to answer	4	0.00

By county

Q1.5_County	Q8.4.1	answers	percentage
Yei	Strongly disagree	4	0.01
Yei	Disagree	8	0.02
Yei	Neither agree nor disagree	28	0.07
Yei	Agree	330	0.80
Yei	Strongly agree	40	0.10
Wau	Strongly disagree	3	0.01
Wau	Disagree	6	0.01
Wau	Neither agree nor disagree	17	0.04
Wau	Agree	278	0.69
Wau	Strongly agree	98	0.24
Rubkona	Strongly disagree	5	0.01
Rubkona	Disagree	9	0.02
Rubkona	Neither agree nor disagree	5	0.01
Rubkona	Agree	232	0.58
Rubkona	Strongly agree	149	0.37
Pibor	Strongly disagree	34	0.08
Pibor	Disagree	58	0.14
Pibor	Neither agree nor disagree	48	0.12
Pibor	Agree	231	0.57
Pibor	Strongly agree	36	0.09
Morobo	Strongly disagree	14	0.03
Morobo	Disagree	9	0.02
Morobo	Neither agree nor disagree	11	0.03
Morobo	Agree	224	0.55
Morobo	Strongly agree	146	0.36
Malakal	Strongly disagree	1	0.00
Malakal	Disagree	3	0.01
Malakal	Neither agree nor disagree	4	0.01
Malakal	Agree	389	0.92
Malakal	Strongly agree	24	0.06
Lainya	Strongly disagree	9	0.02
Lainya	Disagree	20	0.05
Lainya	Neither agree nor disagree	34	0.08
Lainya	Agree	290	0.70
Lainya	Strongly agree	61	0.15
Kajo-keji	Strongly disagree	6	0.02
Kajo-keji	Disagree	21	0.05
Kajo-keji	Neither agree nor disagree	22	0.06
Kajo-keji	Agree	183	0.46
Kajo-keji	Strongly agree	163	0.41
Kajo-keji	_2. Prefer not to answer	3	0.01
Bor South	Strongly disagree	2	0.00
Bor South	Disagree	7	0.02
Bor South	Neither agree nor disagree	20	0.05
Bor South	Agree	263	0.61
Bor South	Strongly agree	136	0.32
Bor South	_2. Prefer not to answer	1	0.00

Q8.4.2 I am comfortable walking around my neighborhood at night

Entire sample

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
Agree	1548	0.42
Disagree	951	0.26
Neither agree nor disagree	443	0.12
Strongly agree	423	0.11
Strongly disagree	317	0.09
_2. Prefer not to answer	3	0.00

By county

Q1.5_County	Q8.4.2	answers	percentage
Yei	Strongly disagree	2	0.00
Yei	Disagree	132	0.32
Yei	Neither agree nor disagree	51	0.12
Yei	Agree	196	0.48
Yei	Strongly agree	29	0.07
Wau	Strongly disagree	9	0.02
Wau	Disagree	82	0.20
Wau	Neither agree nor disagree	76	0.19
Wau	Agree	172	0.43
Wau	Strongly agree	63	0.16
Rubkona	Strongly disagree	30	0.07
Rubkona	Disagree	67	0.17
Rubkona	Neither agree nor disagree	6	0.01
Rubkona	Agree	189	0.47
Rubkona	Strongly agree	108	0.27
Pibor	Strongly disagree	86	0.21
Pibor	Disagree	189	0.46
Pibor	Neither agree nor disagree	36	0.09
Pibor	Agree	84	0.21
Pibor	Strongly agree	11	0.03
Pibor	_2. Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Morobo	Strongly disagree	28	0.07
Morobo	Disagree	29	0.07
Morobo	Neither agree nor disagree	49	0.12
Morobo	Agree	219	0.54
Morobo	Strongly agree	79	0.20
Malakal	Strongly disagree	13	0.03
Malakal	Disagree	138	0.33
Malakal	Neither agree nor disagree	58	0.14
Malakal	Agree	208	0.49
Malakal	Strongly agree	4	0.01
Lainya	Strongly disagree	33	0.08
Lainya	Disagree	79	0.19
Lainya	Neither agree nor disagree	58	0.14
Lainya	Agree	224	0.54
Lainya	Strongly agree	20	0.05
Kajo-keji	Strongly disagree	51	0.13
Kajo-keji	Disagree	39	0.10
Kajo-keji	Neither agree nor disagree	41	0.10
Kajo-keji	Agree	191	0.48
Kajo-keji	Strongly agree	74	0.19
Kajo-keji	_2. Prefer not to answer	2	0.01
Bor South	Strongly disagree	65	0.15
Bor South	Disagree	196	0.46
Bor South	Neither agree nor disagree	68	0.16
Bor South	Agree	65	0.15
Bor South	Strongly agree	35	0.08

Q8.4.3 I am comfortable allowing children in my family to walk around my neighborhood at night without adult supervision

Entire sample

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
Disagree	1101	0.30
Agree	1083	0.29
Strongly disagree	945	0.26
Neither agree nor disagree	334	0.09
Strongly agree	216	0.06
_2. Prefer not to answer	6	0.00

By county

Q1.5_County	Q8.4.3	answers	percentage
Yei	Strongly disagree	27	0.07
Yei	Disagree	206	0.50
Yei	Neither agree nor disagree	54	0.13
Yei	Agree	111	0.27
Yei	Strongly agree	12	0.03
Wau	Strongly disagree	42	0.10
Wau	Disagree	131	0.33
Wau	Neither agree nor disagree	73	0.18
Wau	Agree	134	0.33
Wau	Strongly agree	21	0.05
Wau	_2. Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Rubkona	Strongly disagree	85	0.21
Rubkona	Disagree	101	0.25
Rubkona	Neither agree nor disagree	9	0.02
Rubkona	Agree	150	0.38
Rubkona	Strongly agree	55	0.14
Pibor	Strongly disagree	174	0.43
Pibor	Disagree	162	0.40
Pibor	Neither agree nor disagree	27	0.07
Pibor	Agree	39	0.10
Pibor	Strongly agree	4	0.01
Pibor	_2. Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Morobo	Strongly disagree	54	0.13
Morobo	Disagree	56	0.14
Morobo	Neither agree nor disagree	53	0.13
Morobo	Agree	188	0.47
Morobo	Strongly agree	53	0.13
Malakal	Strongly disagree	61	0.14
Malakal	Disagree	226	0.54
Malakal	Neither agree nor disagree	5	0.01
Malakal	Agree	129	0.31
Lainya	Strongly disagree	82	0.20
Lainya	Disagree	81	0.20
Lainya	Neither agree nor disagree	65	0.16
Lainya	Agree	167	0.40
Lainya	Strongly agree	19	0.05
Kajo-keji	Strongly disagree	150	0.38
Kajo-keji	Disagree	62	0.16
Kajo-keji	Neither agree nor disagree	33	0.08
Kajo-keji	Agree	119	0.30
Kajo-keji	Strongly agree	30	0.08
Kajo-keji	_2. Prefer not to answer	4	0.01
Bor South	Strongly disagree	270	0.63
Bor South	Disagree	76	0.18
Bor South	Neither agree nor disagree	15	0.03
Bor South	Agree	46	0.11
Bor South	Strongly agree	22	0.05

Q8.4.4 The level of crime in this area is a cause of concern for me.

Entire sample

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
Agree	1701	0.46
Disagree	861	0.23
Strongly agree	446	0.12
Neither agree nor disagree	389	0.11
Strongly disagree	266	0.07
_2. Prefer not to answer	22	0.01

By county

Q1.5_County	Q8.4.4	answers	percentage
Yei	Strongly disagree	5	0.01
Yei	Disagree	125	0.30
Yei	Neither agree nor disagree	53	0.13
Yei	Agree	182	0.44
Yei	Strongly agree	45	0.11
Wau	Strongly disagree	3	0.01
Wau	Disagree	44	0.11
Wau	Neither agree nor disagree	51	0.13
Wau	Agree	245	0.61
Wau	Strongly agree	54	0.13
Wau	_2. Prefer not to answer	5	0.01
Rubkona	Strongly disagree	33	0.08
Rubkona	Disagree	74	0.18
Rubkona	Neither agree nor disagree	24	0.06
Rubkona	Agree	166	0.42
Rubkona	Strongly agree	103	0.26
Pibor	Strongly disagree	62	0.15
Pibor	Disagree	113	0.28
Pibor	Neither agree nor disagree	67	0.16
Pibor	Agree	145	0.36
Pibor	Strongly agree	20	0.05
Morobo	Strongly disagree	20	0.05
Morobo	Disagree	69	0.17
Morobo	Neither agree nor disagree	47	0.12
Morobo	Agree	179	0.44
Morobo	Strongly agree	89	0.22
Malakal	Strongly disagree	1	0.00
Malakal	Disagree	179	0.43
Malakal	Neither agree nor disagree	18	0.04
Malakal	Agree	215	0.51
Malakal	Strongly agree	8	0.02
Lainya	Strongly disagree	17	0.04
Lainya	Disagree	99	0.24
Lainya	Neither agree nor disagree	33	0.08
Lainya	Agree	232	0.56
Lainya	Strongly agree	32	0.08
Lainya	_2. Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Kajo-keji	Strongly disagree	61	0.15
Kajo-keji	Disagree	112	0.28
Kajo-keji	Neither agree nor disagree	43	0.11
Kajo-keji	Agree	118	0.30
Kajo-keji	Strongly agree	50	0.13
Kajo-keji	_2. Prefer not to answer	14	0.04
Bor South	Strongly disagree	64	0.15
Bor South	Disagree	46	0.11
Bor South	Neither agree nor disagree	53	0.12
Bor South	Agree	219	0.51
Bor South	Strongly agree	45	0.10
Bor South	_2. Prefer not to answer	2	0.00

Q8.4.5 Me or my family fear crime in our own home

Entire sample

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
Agree	1972	0.54
Strongly agree	686	0.19
Disagree	515	0.14
Neither agree nor disagree	308	0.08
Strongly disagree	185	0.05
_2. Prefer not to answer	19	0.01

By county

Q1.5_County	Q8.4.5	answers	percentage
Yei	Strongly disagree	4	0.01
Yei	Disagree	24	0.06
Yei	Neither agree nor disagree	48	0.12
Yei	Agree	294	0.72
Yei	Strongly agree	40	0.10
Wau	Strongly disagree	4	0.01
Wau	Disagree	44	0.11
Wau	Neither agree nor disagree	48	0.12
Wau	Agree	223	0.55
Wau	Strongly agree	80	0.20
Wau	_2. Prefer not to answer	3	0.01
Rubkona	Strongly disagree	43	0.11
Rubkona	Disagree	40	0.10
Rubkona	Neither agree nor disagree	10	0.03
Rubkona	Agree	201	0.50
Rubkona	Strongly agree	106	0.26
Pibor	Strongly disagree	32	0.08
Pibor	Disagree	81	0.20
Pibor	Neither agree nor disagree	69	0.17
Pibor	Agree	195	0.48
Pibor	Strongly agree	29	0.07
Pibor	_2. Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Morobo	Strongly disagree	13	0.03
Morobo	Disagree	31	0.08
Morobo	Neither agree nor disagree	37	0.09
Morobo	Agree	223	0.55
Morobo	Strongly agree	100	0.25
Malakal	Strongly disagree	2	0.00
Malakal	Disagree	162	0.38
Malakal	Neither agree nor disagree	31	0.07
Malakal	Agree	220	0.52
Malakal	Strongly agree	6	0.01
Lainya	Strongly disagree	10	0.02
Lainya	Disagree	57	0.14
Lainya	Neither agree nor disagree	27	0.07
Lainya	Agree	252	0.61
Lainya	Strongly agree	68	0.16
Kajo-keji	Strongly disagree	60	0.15
Kajo-keji	Disagree	38	0.10
Kajo-keji	Neither agree nor disagree	23	0.06
Kajo-keji	Agree	145	0.36
Kajo-keji	Strongly agree	118	0.30
Kajo-keji	_2. Prefer not to answer	14	0.04
Bor South	Strongly disagree	17	0.04
Bor South	Disagree	38	0.09
Bor South	Neither agree nor disagree	15	0.03
Bor South	Agree	219	0.51
Bor South	Strongly agree	139	0.32
Bor South	_2. Prefer not to answer	1	0.00

Q8.4.6 The high visibility of firearms or weapons in the streets of my community is causing concerns for me

Entire sample

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
Agree	1664	0.45
Disagree	764	0.21
Strongly agree	503	0.14
Strongly disagree	376	0.10
Neither agree nor disagree	339	0.09
_2. Prefer not to answer	39	0.01

By county

Q1.5_County	Q8.4.6	answers	percentage
Yei	Strongly disagree	8	0.02
Yei	Disagree	104	0.25
Yei	Neither agree nor disagree	48	0.12
Yei	Agree	220	0.54
Yei	Strongly agree	30	0.07
Wau	Strongly disagree	27	0.07
Wau	Disagree	72	0.18
Wau	Neither agree nor disagree	67	0.17
Wau	Agree	191	0.48
Wau	Strongly agree	29	0.07
Wau	_2. Prefer not to answer	16	0.04
Rubkona	Strongly disagree	52	0.13
Rubkona	Disagree	42	0.10
Rubkona	Neither agree nor disagree	20	0.05
Rubkona	Agree	190	0.48
Rubkona	Strongly agree	95	0.24
Rubkona	_2. Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Pibor	Strongly disagree	54	0.13
Pibor	Disagree	110	0.27
Pibor	Neither agree nor disagree	61	0.15
Pibor	Agree	154	0.38
Pibor	Strongly agree	26	0.06
Pibor	_2. Prefer not to answer	2	0.00
Morobo	Strongly disagree	31	0.08
Morobo	Disagree	89	0.22
Morobo	Neither agree nor disagree	28	0.07
Morobo	Agree	162	0.40
Morobo	Strongly agree	94	0.23
Malakal	Strongly disagree	8	0.02
Malakal	Disagree	161	0.38
Malakal	Neither agree nor disagree	23	0.05
Malakal	Agree	226	0.54
Malakal	Strongly agree	3	0.01
Lainya	Strongly disagree	42	0.10
Lainya	Disagree	66	0.16
Lainya	Neither agree nor disagree	33	0.08
Lainya	Agree	214	0.52
Lainya	Strongly agree	56	0.14
Lainya	_2. Prefer not to answer	3	0.01
Kajo-keji	Strongly disagree	88	0.22
Kajo-keji	Disagree	80	0.20
Kajo-keji	Neither agree nor disagree	34	0.09
Kajo-keji	Agree	110	0.28
Kajo-keji	Strongly agree	71	0.18
Kajo-keji	_2. Prefer not to answer	15	0.04
Bor South	Strongly disagree	66	0.15
Bor South	Disagree	40	0.09
Bor South	Neither agree nor disagree	25	0.06
Bor South	Agree	197	0.46
Bor South	Strongly agree	99	0.23
Bor South	_2. Prefer not to answer	2	0.00

Q8.7 On a scale from 1 to 10, where 1 is “very unimportant” and 10 is “very important,” how important is it to you to own a weapon to defend yourself and your family?

Entire sample

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
Very safe	714	0.19
very important	704	0.19
very unimportant	678	0.18
Very unsafe	658	0.18
Very likely	324	0.09
Very dissatisfied	215	0.06
Very unlikely	209	0.06
Very satisfied	137	0.04
_2. Prefer not to answer	46	0.01

By county

Q1.5_County	Q8.7	answers	percentage
Yei	very unimportant	68	0.17
Yei	very important	27	0.07
Yei	Very unsafe	92	0.22
Yei	Very dissatisfied	34	0.08
Yei	Very unlikely	34	0.08
Yei	Very safe	118	0.29
Yei	Very likely	32	0.08
Yei	Very satisfied	4	0.01
Yei	_2. Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Wau	very unimportant	39	0.10
Wau	very important	80	0.20
Wau	Very unsafe	41	0.10
Wau	Very dissatisfied	23	0.06
Wau	Very unlikely	27	0.07
Wau	Very safe	97	0.24
Wau	Very likely	41	0.10
Wau	Very satisfied	20	0.05
Wau	_2. Prefer not to answer	34	0.08
Rubkona	very unimportant	151	0.38
Rubkona	very important	75	0.19
Rubkona	Very unsafe	61	0.15
Rubkona	Very dissatisfied	15	0.04
Rubkona	Very unlikely	32	0.08
Rubkona	Very safe	17	0.04
Rubkona	Very likely	37	0.09
Rubkona	Very satisfied	12	0.03
Pibor	very unimportant	42	0.10
Pibor	very important	31	0.08
Pibor	Very unsafe	46	0.11
Pibor	Very dissatisfied	46	0.11
Pibor	Very unlikely	43	0.11
Pibor	Very safe	138	0.34
Pibor	Very likely	40	0.10
Pibor	Very satisfied	18	0.04
Pibor	_2. Prefer not to answer	3	0.01
Morobo	very unimportant	91	0.23
Morobo	very important	66	0.16
Morobo	Very unsafe	92	0.23
Morobo	Very dissatisfied	24	0.06
Morobo	Very unlikely	16	0.04
Morobo	Very safe	75	0.19
Morobo	Very likely	21	0.05
Morobo	Very satisfied	19	0.05
Malakal	very unimportant	43	0.10
Malakal	very important	103	0.24
Malakal	Very unsafe	74	0.18
Malakal	Very dissatisfied	1	0.00
Malakal	Very unlikely	9	0.02
Malakal	Very safe	101	0.24
Malakal	Very likely	78	0.19
Malakal	Very satisfied	11	0.03
Malakal	_2. Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Lainya	very unimportant	123	0.30
Lainya	very important	45	0.11
Lainya	Very unsafe	107	0.26
Lainya	Very dissatisfied	26	0.06
Lainya	Very unlikely	26	0.06
Lainya	Very safe	67	0.16
Lainya	Very likely	13	0.03
Lainya	Very satisfied	6	0.01
Lainya	_2. Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Kajo-keji	very unimportant	71	0.18
Kajo-keji	very important	137	0.34
Kajo-keji	Very unsafe	47	0.12
Kajo-keji	Very dissatisfied	12	0.03
Kajo-keji	Very unlikely	12	0.03
Kajo-keji	Very safe	63	0.16
Kajo-keji	Very likely	29	0.07
Kajo-keji	Very satisfied	22	0.06
Kajo-keji	_2. Prefer not to answer	5	0.01
Bor South	very unimportant	50	0.12
Bor South	very important	140	0.33
Bor South	Very unsafe	98	0.23
Bor South	Very dissatisfied	34	0.08
Bor South	Very unlikely	10	0.02
Bor South	Very safe	38	0.09
Bor South	Very likely	33	0.08
Bor South	Very satisfied	25	0.06
Bor South	_2. Prefer not to answer	1	0.00

Q8.8 Imagine that a close family member committed a violent crime. How likely would you report him or her to the police, on a scale from 1 through 10 where 1 is “very unlikely” and 10 is “very likely”?

Entire sample

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
Very safe	1078	0.29
very likely	775	0.21
Very unsafe	467	0.13
very unlikely	415	0.11
very important	316	0.09
Very satisfied	213	0.06
very unimportant	210	0.06
Very dissatisfied	194	0.05
_2. Prefer not to answer	17	0.00

By county

Q1.5_County	Q8.8	answers	percentage
Yei	very unlikely	14	0.03
Yei	very likely	51	0.12
Yei	very unimportant	21	0.05
Yei	Very unsafe	65	0.16
Yei	Very dissatisfied	29	0.07
Yei	Very safe	198	0.48
Yei	Very satisfied	12	0.03
Yei	very important	19	0.05
Yei	_2. Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Wau	very unlikely	11	0.03
Wau	very likely	52	0.13
Wau	very unimportant	5	0.01
Wau	Very unsafe	30	0.07
Wau	Very dissatisfied	13	0.03
Wau	Very safe	172	0.43
Wau	Very satisfied	36	0.09
Wau	very important	82	0.20
Wau	_2. Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Rubkona	very unlikely	146	0.36
Rubkona	very likely	78	0.20
Rubkona	very unimportant	24	0.06
Rubkona	Very unsafe	54	0.14
Rubkona	Very dissatisfied	18	0.04
Rubkona	Very safe	31	0.08
Rubkona	Very satisfied	17	0.04
Rubkona	very important	32	0.08
Pibor	very unlikely	78	0.19
Pibor	very likely	10	0.02
Pibor	very unimportant	81	0.20
Pibor	Very unsafe	69	0.17
Pibor	Very dissatisfied	52	0.13
Pibor	Very safe	75	0.18
Pibor	Very satisfied	27	0.07
Pibor	very important	13	0.03
Pibor	_2. Prefer not to answer	2	0.00
Morobo	very unlikely	27	0.07
Morobo	very likely	30	0.07
Morobo	very unimportant	22	0.05
Morobo	Very unsafe	49	0.12
Morobo	Very dissatisfied	26	0.06
Morobo	Very safe	198	0.49
Morobo	Very satisfied	23	0.06
Morobo	very important	25	0.06
Morobo	_2. Prefer not to answer	4	0.01
Malakal	very unlikely	44	0.10
Malakal	very likely	200	0.48
Malakal	very unimportant	2	0.00
Malakal	Very unsafe	13	0.03
Malakal	Very dissatisfied	3	0.01
Malakal	Very safe	116	0.28
Malakal	Very satisfied	18	0.04
Malakal	very important	25	0.06
Lainya	very unlikely	34	0.08
Lainya	very likely	79	0.19
Lainya	very unimportant	36	0.09
Lainya	Very unsafe	59	0.14
Lainya	Very dissatisfied	23	0.06
Lainya	Very safe	115	0.28
Lainya	Very satisfied	36	0.09
Lainya	very important	32	0.08
Kajo-keji	very unlikely	44	0.11
Kajo-keji	very likely	118	0.30
Kajo-keji	very unimportant	13	0.03
Kajo-keji	Very unsafe	23	0.06
Kajo-keji	Very dissatisfied	7	0.02
Kajo-keji	Very safe	91	0.23
Kajo-keji	Very satisfied	25	0.06
Kajo-keji	very important	69	0.17
Kajo-keji	_2. Prefer not to answer	8	0.02
Bor South	very unlikely	17	0.04
Bor South	very likely	157	0.37
Bor South	very unimportant	6	0.01
Bor South	Very unsafe	105	0.24
Bor South	Very dissatisfied	23	0.05
Bor South	Very safe	82	0.19
Bor South	Very satisfied	19	0.04
Bor South	very important	19	0.04
Bor South	_2. Prefer not to answer	1	0.00

Q8.9 In your opinion, is cattle raiding acceptable?

Entire sample

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
No	2375	0.64
Only in some circumstances	595	0.16
Yes	583	0.16
_2 Prefer not to answer	132	0.04

By county

Q1.5_County	Q8.9	answers	percentage
Yei	No	334	0.81
Yei	Only in some circumstances	58	0.14
Yei	Yes	18	0.04
Wau	No	239	0.59
Wau	Only in some circumstances	30	0.07
Wau	Yes	71	0.18
Wau	_2 Prefer not to answer	62	0.15
Rubkona	No	322	0.80
Rubkona	Only in some circumstances	53	0.13
Rubkona	Yes	18	0.04
Rubkona	_2 Prefer not to answer	7	0.02
Pibor	No	197	0.48
Pibor	Only in some circumstances	116	0.29
Pibor	Yes	91	0.22
Pibor	_2 Prefer not to answer	3	0.01
Morobo	No	336	0.83
Morobo	Only in some circumstances	9	0.02
Morobo	Yes	59	0.15
Malakal	No	153	0.36
Malakal	Only in some circumstances	99	0.24
Malakal	Yes	168	0.40
Malakal	_2 Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Lainya	No	302	0.73
Lainya	Only in some circumstances	69	0.17
Lainya	Yes	27	0.07
Lainya	_2 Prefer not to answer	16	0.04
Kajo-keji	No	266	0.67
Kajo-keji	Only in some circumstances	39	0.10
Kajo-keji	Yes	62	0.16
Kajo-keji	_2 Prefer not to answer	31	0.08
Bor South	No	226	0.53
Bor South	Only in some circumstances	122	0.28
Bor South	Yes	69	0.16
Bor South	_2 Prefer not to answer	12	0.03

8) Political and Legal Fragility

All the answers are in a scale of 0-1, i.e. can have the following values: 0, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1. The higher, the more fragile.

The higher, the more fragile.

Index Questions

Q10.1.2: How much confidence do you have in your state government?

0 (none) to 1 (a lot)

Entire sample

mean
0.51

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
Some confidence	1440	0.39
Confidence	1323	0.36
No confidence	489	0.13
A lot of confidence	426	0.12
Prefer not to answer	7	0.00

By county

County	Mean Response (0 to 1)
Bor South	0.65
Kajo-keji	0.32
Lainya	0.57
Malakal	0.55
Morobo	0.49
Pibor	0.40
Rubkona	0.53
Wau	0.46
Yei	0.63

Q1.5_County	Q10.1.2_raw	answers	percentage
Yei	A lot of confidence	15	0.04
Yei	Confidence	113	0.28
Yei	No confidence	93	0.23
Yei	Some confidence	189	0.46
Wau	A lot of confidence	48	0.12
Wau	Confidence	184	0.46
Wau	No confidence	28	0.07
Wau	Prefer not to answer	3	0.01
Wau	Some confidence	139	0.35
Rubkona	A lot of confidence	32	0.08
Rubkona	Confidence	117	0.29
Rubkona	No confidence	19	0.05
Rubkona	Some confidence	232	0.58
Pibor	A lot of confidence	82	0.20
Pibor	Confidence	193	0.47
Pibor	No confidence	36	0.09
Pibor	Some confidence	96	0.24
Morobo	A lot of confidence	72	0.18
Morobo	Confidence	128	0.32
Morobo	No confidence	64	0.16
Morobo	Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Morobo	Some confidence	139	0.34
Malakal	A lot of confidence	5	0.01
Malakal	Confidence	168	0.40
Malakal	No confidence	33	0.08
Malakal	Some confidence	215	0.51
Lainya	A lot of confidence	23	0.06
Lainya	Confidence	136	0.33
Lainya	No confidence	60	0.14
Lainya	Prefer not to answer	2	0.00
Lainya	Some confidence	193	0.47
Kajo-keji	A lot of confidence	130	0.33
Kajo-keji	Confidence	169	0.42
Kajo-keji	No confidence	23	0.06
Kajo-keji	Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Kajo-keji	Some confidence	75	0.19
Bor South	A lot of confidence	19	0.04
Bor South	Confidence	115	0.27
Bor South	No confidence	133	0.31
Bor South	Some confidence	162	0.38

Q10.1.10: How much confidence do you have in informal authorities, such as councils of elders?

0 (none) to 1 (a lot)

Entire sample

mean
0.45

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
Confidence	1524	0.41
Some confidence	1215	0.33
A lot of confidence	605	0.16
No confidence	316	0.09
Prefer not to answer	25	0.01

By county

County	Mean Response (0 to 1)
Bor South	0.34
Kajo-keji	0.36
Lainya	0.45
Malakal	0.45
Morobo	0.41
Pibor	0.49
Rubkona	0.50
Wau	0.46
Yei	0.56

Q1.5_County	Q10.1.10_raw	answers	percentage
Yei	A lot of confidence	23	0.06
Yei	Confidence	139	0.34
Yei	No confidence	55	0.13
Yei	Some confidence	193	0.47
Wau	A lot of confidence	57	0.14
Wau	Confidence	150	0.37
Wau	No confidence	16	0.04
Wau	Prefer not to answer	9	0.02
Wau	Some confidence	170	0.42
Rubkona	A lot of confidence	34	0.09
Rubkona	Confidence	139	0.35
Rubkona	No confidence	6	0.01
Rubkona	Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Rubkona	Some confidence	220	0.55
Pibor	A lot of confidence	52	0.13
Pibor	Confidence	182	0.45
Pibor	No confidence	73	0.18
Pibor	Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Pibor	Some confidence	99	0.24
Morobo	A lot of confidence	74	0.18
Morobo	Confidence	194	0.48
Morobo	No confidence	35	0.09
Morobo	Prefer not to answer	2	0.00
Morobo	Some confidence	99	0.25
Malakal	A lot of confidence	16	0.04
Malakal	Confidence	250	0.59
Malakal	No confidence	6	0.01
Malakal	Some confidence	149	0.35
Lainya	A lot of confidence	91	0.22
Lainya	Confidence	145	0.35
Lainya	No confidence	57	0.14
Lainya	Prefer not to answer	5	0.01
Lainya	Some confidence	116	0.28
Kajo-keji	A lot of confidence	94	0.24
Kajo-keji	Confidence	188	0.47
Kajo-keji	No confidence	19	0.05
Kajo-keji	Prefer not to answer	7	0.02
Kajo-keji	Some confidence	90	0.23
Bor South	A lot of confidence	164	0.38
Bor South	Confidence	137	0.32
Bor South	No confidence	49	0.11
Bor South	Some confidence	79	0.18

Q10.10: South Sudan’s next national elections are scheduled for December 2024 after being postponed several times. How safe or unsafe would you feel going to a polling station to cast your vote?

0 (very unsafe) to 1 (very safe)

Entire sample

mean
0.5

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
Very unsafe	820	0.22
Very safe	802	0.22
Somewhat safe	695	0.19
Neither safe nor unsafe	677	0.18
Somewhat unsafe	621	0.17
Prefer not to answer	70	0.02

By county

County	Mean Response (0 to 1)
Bor South	0.58
Kajo-keji	0.43
Lainya	0.52
Malakal	0.55
Morobo	0.29
Pibor	0.60
Rubkona	0.68
Wau	0.40
Yei	0.41

Q1.5_County	Q10.10_raw	answers	percentage
Yei	Neither safe nor unsafe	89	0.22
Yei	Prefer not to answer	3	0.01
Yei	Somewhat safe	132	0.32
Yei	Somewhat unsafe	66	0.16
Yei	Very safe	81	0.20
Yei	Very unsafe	39	0.10
Wau	Neither safe nor unsafe	105	0.26
Wau	Prefer not to answer	38	0.09
Wau	Somewhat safe	107	0.27
Wau	Somewhat unsafe	57	0.14
Wau	Very safe	73	0.18
Wau	Very unsafe	22	0.05
Rubkona	Neither safe nor unsafe	48	0.12
Rubkona	Prefer not to answer	4	0.01
Rubkona	Somewhat safe	56	0.14
Rubkona	Somewhat unsafe	84	0.21
Rubkona	Very safe	38	0.10
Rubkona	Very unsafe	170	0.42
Pibor	Neither safe nor unsafe	85	0.21
Pibor	Prefer not to answer	6	0.01
Pibor	Somewhat safe	60	0.15
Pibor	Somewhat unsafe	137	0.34
Pibor	Very safe	40	0.10
Pibor	Very unsafe	79	0.19
Morobo	Neither safe nor unsafe	43	0.11
Morobo	Somewhat safe	52	0.13
Morobo	Somewhat unsafe	42	0.10
Morobo	Very safe	215	0.53
Morobo	Very unsafe	52	0.13
Malakal	Neither safe nor unsafe	75	0.18
Malakal	Prefer not to answer	2	0.00
Malakal	Somewhat safe	150	0.36
Malakal	Somewhat unsafe	69	0.16
Malakal	Very safe	21	0.05
Malakal	Very unsafe	104	0.25
Lainya	Neither safe nor unsafe	88	0.21
Lainya	Prefer not to answer	8	0.02
Lainya	Somewhat safe	43	0.10
Lainya	Somewhat unsafe	50	0.12
Lainya	Very safe	105	0.25
Lainya	Very unsafe	120	0.29
Kajo-keji	Neither safe nor unsafe	48	0.12
Kajo-keji	Prefer not to answer	5	0.01
Kajo-keji	Somewhat safe	66	0.17
Kajo-keji	Somewhat unsafe	45	0.11
Kajo-keji	Very safe	140	0.35
Kajo-keji	Very unsafe	94	0.24
Bor South	Neither safe nor unsafe	96	0.22
Bor South	Prefer not to answer	4	0.01
Bor South	Somewhat safe	29	0.07
Bor South	Somewhat unsafe	71	0.17
Bor South	Very safe	89	0.21
Bor South	Very unsafe	140	0.33

Q10.12: At present, how safe do you feel speaking publicly on politically sensitive issues?

0(very unsafe) to 1(very safe)

Entire sample

mean
0.6

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
Unsafe	1093	0.30
Very unsafe	833	0.23
Safe	810	0.22
Neither safe nor unsafe	641	0.17
Very safe	238	0.06
Prefer not to answer	70	0.02

By county

County	Mean Response (0 to 1)
Bor South	0.69
Kajo-keji	0.65
Lainya	0.57
Malakal	0.61
Morobo	0.56
Pibor	0.54
Rubkona	0.71
Wau	0.57
Yei	0.53

Q1.5_County	Q10.12_raw	answers	percentage
Yei	Neither safe nor unsafe	103	0.25
Yei	Prefer not to answer	5	0.01
Yei	Safe	117	0.29
Yei	Unsafe	151	0.37
Yei	Very safe	12	0.03
Yei	Very unsafe	22	0.05
Wau	Neither safe nor unsafe	78	0.19
Wau	Prefer not to answer	44	0.11
Wau	Safe	79	0.20
Wau	Unsafe	139	0.35
Wau	Very safe	22	0.05
Wau	Very unsafe	40	0.10
Rubkona	Neither safe nor unsafe	40	0.10
Rubkona	Prefer not to answer	2	0.00
Rubkona	Safe	56	0.14
Rubkona	Unsafe	89	0.22
Rubkona	Very safe	33	0.08
Rubkona	Very unsafe	180	0.45
Pibor	Neither safe nor unsafe	110	0.27
Pibor	Prefer not to answer	7	0.02
Pibor	Safe	115	0.28
Pibor	Unsafe	140	0.34
Pibor	Very safe	8	0.02
Pibor	Very unsafe	27	0.07
Morobo	Neither safe nor unsafe	40	0.10
Morobo	Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Morobo	Safe	127	0.31
Morobo	Unsafe	75	0.19
Morobo	Very safe	45	0.11
Morobo	Very unsafe	116	0.29
Malakal	Neither safe nor unsafe	73	0.17
Malakal	Safe	103	0.24
Malakal	Unsafe	175	0.42
Malakal	Very safe	8	0.02
Malakal	Very unsafe	62	0.15
Lainya	Neither safe nor unsafe	87	0.21
Lainya	Prefer not to answer	4	0.01
Lainya	Safe	89	0.21
Lainya	Unsafe	123	0.30
Lainya	Very safe	37	0.09
Lainya	Very unsafe	74	0.18
Kajo-keji	Neither safe nor unsafe	45	0.11
Kajo-keji	Prefer not to answer	5	0.01
Kajo-keji	Safe	69	0.17
Kajo-keji	Unsafe	61	0.15
Kajo-keji	Very safe	49	0.12
Kajo-keji	Very unsafe	169	0.42
Bor South	Neither safe nor unsafe	65	0.15
Bor South	Prefer not to answer	2	0.00
Bor South	Safe	55	0.13
Bor South	Unsafe	140	0.33
Bor South	Very safe	24	0.06
Bor South	Very unsafe	143	0.33

Q10.13: Which of the following statements best describes the role that politicians in Juba play in your community?

0(they make the community much less safe) to 1(they make the community much more safe)

Entire sample

mean
0.67

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
Politicians in Juba make this community much less safe	1043	0.28
Politicians in Juba make this community less safe	943	0.26
Politicians in Juba neither make this community more nor less safe	867	0.24
Politicians in Juba make this community more safe	404	0.11
Prefer not to answer	283	0.08
Politicians in Juba make this community much more safe	145	0.04

By county

County	Mean Response (0 to 1)
Bor South	0.76
Kajo-keji	0.56
Lainya	0.58
Malakal	0.74
Morobo	0.61
Pibor	0.67
Rubkona	0.76
Wau	0.54
Yei	0.75

Q1.5_County	Q10.13_raw	answers	percentage
Yei	Politicians in Juba make this community less safe	151	0.37
Yei	Politicians in Juba make this community more safe	23	0.06
Yei	Politicians in Juba make this community much less safe	145	0.35
Yei	Politicians in Juba make this community much more safe	7	0.02
Yei	Politicians in Juba neither make this community more nor less safe	78	0.19
Yei	Prefer not to answer	6	0.01
Wau	Politicians in Juba make this community less safe	65	0.16
Wau	Politicians in Juba make this community more safe	43	0.11
Wau	Politicians in Juba make this community much less safe	35	0.09
Wau	Politicians in Juba make this community much more safe	28	0.07
Wau	Politicians in Juba neither make this community more nor less safe	70	0.17
Wau	Prefer not to answer	161	0.40
Rubkona	Politicians in Juba make this community less safe	83	0.21
Rubkona	Politicians in Juba make this community more safe	26	0.06
Rubkona	Politicians in Juba make this community much less safe	182	0.46
Rubkona	Politicians in Juba make this community much more safe	4	0.01
Rubkona	Politicians in Juba neither make this community more nor less safe	100	0.25
Rubkona	Prefer not to answer	5	0.01
Pibor	Politicians in Juba make this community less safe	111	0.27
Pibor	Politicians in Juba make this community more safe	54	0.13
Pibor	Politicians in Juba make this community much less safe	126	0.31
Pibor	Politicians in Juba make this community much more safe	17	0.04
Pibor	Politicians in Juba neither make this community more nor less safe	91	0.22
Pibor	Prefer not to answer	8	0.02
Morobo	Politicians in Juba make this community less safe	93	0.23
Morobo	Politicians in Juba make this community more safe	55	0.14
Morobo	Politicians in Juba make this community much less safe	113	0.28
Morobo	Politicians in Juba make this community much more safe	46	0.11
Morobo	Politicians in Juba neither make this community more nor less safe	96	0.24
Morobo	Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Malakal	Politicians in Juba make this community less safe	197	0.47
Malakal	Politicians in Juba make this community more safe	20	0.05
Malakal	Politicians in Juba make this community much less safe	117	0.28
Malakal	Politicians in Juba neither make this community more nor less safe	87	0.21
Lainya	Politicians in Juba make this community less safe	97	0.23
Lainya	Politicians in Juba make this community more safe	56	0.14
Lainya	Politicians in Juba make this community much less safe	68	0.16
Lainya	Politicians in Juba make this community much more safe	23	0.06
Lainya	Politicians in Juba neither make this community more nor less safe	155	0.37
Lainya	Prefer not to answer	15	0.04
Kajo-keji	Politicians in Juba make this community less safe	65	0.16
Kajo-keji	Politicians in Juba make this community more safe	110	0.28
Kajo-keji	Politicians in Juba make this community much less safe	83	0.21
Kajo-keji	Politicians in Juba make this community much more safe	14	0.04
Kajo-keji	Politicians in Juba neither make this community more nor less safe	89	0.22
Kajo-keji	Prefer not to answer	37	0.09
Bor South	Politicians in Juba make this community less safe	81	0.19
Bor South	Politicians in Juba make this community more safe	17	0.04
Bor South	Politicians in Juba make this community much less safe	174	0.41
Bor South	Politicians in Juba make this community much more safe	6	0.01
Bor South	Politicians in Juba neither make this community more nor less safe	101	0.24
Bor South	Prefer not to answer	50	0.12

Additional Questions

Q9.1 Imagine that you have a problem or a dispute, who would you first seek help from?

Entire sample

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
Chief of the village	1701	0.46
Family / friends	976	0.26
Police	579	0.16
Religious leaders	202	0.05
Traditional authorities	81	0.02
Government officials (county or payam)	58	0.02
No one	39	0.01
Court	32	0.01
_2. Prefer not to answer	17	0.00

By county

Q1.5_County	Q9.1	answers	percentage
Yei	Family / friends	60	0.15
Yei	Chief of the village	297	0.72
Yei	Religious leaders	43	0.10
Yei	Police	2	0.00
Yei	Court	4	0.01
Yei	Traditional authorities	1	0.00
Yei	_2. Prefer not to answer	3	0.01
Wau	Family / friends	82	0.20
Wau	Chief of the village	226	0.56
Wau	Religious leaders	6	0.01
Wau	Police	69	0.17
Wau	Court	1	0.00
Wau	Traditional authorities	5	0.01
Wau	Government officials (county or payam)	2	0.00
Wau	No one	5	0.01
Wau	_2. Prefer not to answer	6	0.01
Rubkona	Family / friends	128	0.32
Rubkona	Chief of the village	156	0.39
Rubkona	Religious leaders	14	0.04
Rubkona	Police	64	0.16
Rubkona	Court	2	0.00
Rubkona	Traditional authorities	25	0.06
Rubkona	Government officials (county or payam)	6	0.01
Rubkona	No one	4	0.01
Rubkona	_2. Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Pibor	Family / friends	61	0.15
Pibor	Chief of the village	202	0.50
Pibor	Religious leaders	31	0.08
Pibor	Police	58	0.14
Pibor	Court	8	0.02
Pibor	Traditional authorities	14	0.03
Pibor	Government officials (county or payam)	13	0.03
Pibor	No one	19	0.05
Pibor	_2. Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Morobo	Family / friends	106	0.26
Morobo	Chief of the village	208	0.51
Morobo	Religious leaders	47	0.12
Morobo	Police	28	0.07
Morobo	Court	6	0.01
Morobo	Traditional authorities	2	0.00
Morobo	No one	7	0.02
Malakal	Family / friends	60	0.14
Malakal	Chief of the village	71	0.17
Malakal	Religious leaders	3	0.01
Malakal	Police	250	0.59
Malakal	Court	1	0.00
Malakal	Traditional authorities	2	0.00
Malakal	Government officials (county or payam)	34	0.08
Lainya	Family / friends	94	0.23
Lainya	Chief of the village	209	0.50
Lainya	Religious leaders	43	0.10
Lainya	Police	48	0.12
Lainya	Court	6	0.01
Lainya	Traditional authorities	11	0.03
Lainya	Government officials (county or payam)	1	0.00
Lainya	No one	2	0.00
Kajo-keji	Family / friends	228	0.57
Kajo-keji	Chief of the village	124	0.31
Kajo-keji	Religious leaders	15	0.04
Kajo-keji	Police	11	0.03
Kajo-keji	Traditional authorities	16	0.04
Kajo-keji	Government officials (county or payam)	1	0.00
Kajo-keji	_2. Prefer not to answer	3	0.01
Bor South	Family / friends	157	0.37
Bor South	Chief of the village	208	0.48
Bor South	Police	49	0.11
Bor South	Court	4	0.01
Bor South	Traditional authorities	5	0.01
Bor South	Government officials (county or payam)	1	0.00
Bor South	No one	2	0.00
Bor South	_2. Prefer not to answer	3	0.01

Q9.3 Imagine that a person from this community stole cattle from your family. Who would you be most likely to seek help from?

Entire sample

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
Village chiefs	1492	0.40
Police	1324	0.36
A friend or family member	436	0.12
Payam authorities	190	0.05
_2. Prefer not to answer	74	0.02
State authorities	72	0.02
Statutory courts	50	0.01
I would not seek help at all	27	0.01
Politicians in Juba	10	0.00
Friends or family in the diaspora	10	0.00

By county

Q1.5_County	Q9.3	answers	percentage
Yei	A friend or family member	46	0.11
Yei	Police	28	0.07
Yei	Statutory courts	7	0.02
Yei	Village chiefs	314	0.77
Yei	State authorities	1	0.00
Yei	Payam authorities	12	0.03
Yei	_2. Prefer not to answer	2	0.00
Wau	A friend or family member	45	0.11
Wau	Police	193	0.48
Wau	Statutory courts	7	0.02
Wau	Village chiefs	77	0.19
Wau	State authorities	7	0.02
Wau	Payam authorities	21	0.05
Wau	Politicians in Juba	1	0.00
Wau	I would not seek help at all	5	0.01
Wau	_2. Prefer not to answer	46	0.11
Rubkona	A friend or family member	72	0.18
Rubkona	Police	168	0.42
Rubkona	Statutory courts	1	0.00
Rubkona	Village chiefs	96	0.24
Rubkona	State authorities	14	0.04
Rubkona	Payam authorities	45	0.11
Rubkona	_2. Prefer not to answer	4	0.01
Pibor	A friend or family member	49	0.12
Pibor	Police	130	0.32
Pibor	Statutory courts	13	0.03
Pibor	Village chiefs	131	0.32
Pibor	State authorities	28	0.07
Pibor	Payam authorities	40	0.10
Pibor	Politicians in Juba	1	0.00
Pibor	Friends or family in the diaspora	6	0.01
Pibor	I would not seek help at all	7	0.02
Pibor	_2. Prefer not to answer	2	0.00
Morobo	A friend or family member	56	0.14
Morobo	Police	80	0.20
Morobo	Statutory courts	8	0.02
Morobo	Village chiefs	243	0.60
Morobo	State authorities	6	0.01
Morobo	Payam authorities	4	0.01
Morobo	Politicians in Juba	5	0.01
Morobo	I would not seek help at all	2	0.00
Malakal	A friend or family member	14	0.03
Malakal	Police	292	0.69
Malakal	Village chiefs	74	0.18
Malakal	State authorities	3	0.01
Malakal	Payam authorities	38	0.09
Lainya	A friend or family member	31	0.07
Lainya	Police	168	0.41
Lainya	Statutory courts	11	0.03
Lainya	Village chiefs	162	0.39
Lainya	State authorities	5	0.01
Lainya	Payam authorities	20	0.05
Lainya	Politicians in Juba	3	0.01
Lainya	Friends or family in the diaspora	4	0.01
Lainya	I would not seek help at all	10	0.02
Kajo-keji	A friend or family member	68	0.17
Kajo-keji	Police	140	0.35
Kajo-keji	Statutory courts	2	0.01
Kajo-keji	Village chiefs	180	0.45
Kajo-keji	State authorities	2	0.01
Kajo-keji	Payam authorities	4	0.01
Kajo-keji	I would not seek help at all	1	0.00
Kajo-keji	_2. Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Bor South	A friend or family member	55	0.13
Bor South	Police	125	0.29
Bor South	Statutory courts	1	0.00
Bor South	Village chiefs	215	0.50
Bor South	State authorities	6	0.01
Bor South	Payam authorities	6	0.01
Bor South	I would not seek help at all	2	0.00
Bor South	_2. Prefer not to answer	19	0.04

Q9.4 Imagine that a person from outside this community stole cattle from your family. Who would you be most likely to seek help from?

Entire sample

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
Police	1544	0.42
Village chiefs	1197	0.32
Payam authorities	310	0.08
A friend or family member	274	0.07
State authorities	172	0.05
_2. Prefer not to answer	75	0.02
Statutory courts	70	0.02
I would not seek help at all	43	0.01

By county

Q1.5_County	Q9.4	answers	percentage
Yei	A friend or family member	41	0.10
Yei	Police	52	0.13
Yei	Statutory courts	10	0.02
Yei	Village chiefs	261	0.64
Yei	State authorities	4	0.01
Yei	Payam authorities	41	0.10
Yei	_2. Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Wau	A friend or family member	12	0.03
Wau	Police	211	0.52
Wau	Statutory courts	7	0.02
Wau	Village chiefs	75	0.19
Wau	State authorities	24	0.06
Wau	Payam authorities	24	0.06
Wau	I would not seek help at all	4	0.01
Wau	_2. Prefer not to answer	45	0.11
Rubkona	A friend or family member	49	0.12
Rubkona	Police	188	0.47
Rubkona	Statutory courts	7	0.02
Rubkona	Village chiefs	81	0.20
Rubkona	State authorities	41	0.10
Rubkona	Payam authorities	32	0.08
Rubkona	_2. Prefer not to answer	2	0.00
Pibor	A friend or family member	31	0.08
Pibor	Police	112	0.28
Pibor	Statutory courts	20	0.05
Pibor	Village chiefs	146	0.36
Pibor	State authorities	42	0.10
Pibor	Payam authorities	40	0.10
Pibor	I would not seek help at all	15	0.04
Pibor	_2. Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Morobo	A friend or family member	42	0.10
Morobo	Police	99	0.25
Morobo	Statutory courts	14	0.03
Morobo	Village chiefs	233	0.58
Morobo	State authorities	2	0.00
Morobo	Payam authorities	12	0.03
Morobo	I would not seek help at all	2	0.00
Malakal	A friend or family member	6	0.01
Malakal	Police	290	0.69
Malakal	Statutory courts	2	0.00
Malakal	Village chiefs	81	0.19
Malakal	State authorities	4	0.01
Malakal	Payam authorities	38	0.09
Lainya	A friend or family member	24	0.06
Lainya	Police	189	0.46
Lainya	Statutory courts	8	0.02
Lainya	Village chiefs	121	0.29
Lainya	State authorities	13	0.03
Lainya	Payam authorities	36	0.09
Lainya	I would not seek help at all	19	0.05
Lainya	_2. Prefer not to answer	4	0.01
Kajo-keji	A friend or family member	24	0.06
Kajo-keji	Police	226	0.57
Kajo-keji	Statutory courts	2	0.01
Kajo-keji	Village chiefs	109	0.27
Kajo-keji	State authorities	2	0.01
Kajo-keji	Payam authorities	31	0.08
Kajo-keji	I would not seek help at all	2	0.01
Kajo-keji	_2. Prefer not to answer	2	0.01
Bor South	A friend or family member	45	0.10
Bor South	Police	177	0.41
Bor South	Village chiefs	90	0.21
Bor South	State authorities	40	0.09
Bor South	Payam authorities	56	0.13
Bor South	I would not seek help at all	1	0.00
Bor South	_2. Prefer not to answer	20	0.05

Q9.5 Imagine that a person from outside this community stole cattle from your family. Who would you be most likely to seek help from?

Entire sample

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
Police	1656	0.45
Village chiefs	1169	0.32
State authorities	468	0.13
Payam authorities	248	0.07
Statutory courts	91	0.02
State military	41	0.01
Other:	12	0.00

By county

Q1.5_County	Q9.5	answers	percentage
Yei	Police	62	0.15
Yei	Statutory courts	6	0.01
Yei	Village chiefs	278	0.68
Yei	State authorities	30	0.07
Yei	Payam authorities	33	0.08
Yei	State military	1	0.00
Wau	Police	202	0.50
Wau	Statutory courts	17	0.04
Wau	Village chiefs	121	0.30
Wau	State authorities	45	0.11
Wau	Payam authorities	10	0.02
Wau	State military	1	0.00
Wau	Other:	6	0.01
Rubkona	Police	205	0.51
Rubkona	Statutory courts	6	0.01
Rubkona	Village chiefs	73	0.18
Rubkona	State authorities	81	0.20
Rubkona	Payam authorities	33	0.08
Rubkona	State military	1	0.00
Rubkona	Other:	1	0.00
Pibor	Police	102	0.25
Pibor	Statutory courts	18	0.04
Pibor	Village chiefs	150	0.37
Pibor	State authorities	88	0.22
Pibor	Payam authorities	45	0.11
Pibor	State military	4	0.01
Morobo	Police	117	0.29
Morobo	Statutory courts	18	0.04
Morobo	Village chiefs	215	0.53
Morobo	State authorities	10	0.02
Morobo	Payam authorities	26	0.06
Morobo	State military	17	0.04
Morobo	Other:	1	0.00
Malakal	Police	301	0.71
Malakal	Statutory courts	7	0.02
Malakal	Village chiefs	49	0.12
Malakal	State authorities	43	0.10
Malakal	Payam authorities	21	0.05
Lainya	Police	219	0.53
Lainya	Statutory courts	12	0.03
Lainya	Village chiefs	112	0.27
Lainya	State authorities	39	0.09
Lainya	Payam authorities	19	0.05
Lainya	State military	12	0.03
Lainya	Other:	1	0.00
Kajo-keji	Police	264	0.66
Kajo-keji	Statutory courts	4	0.01
Kajo-keji	Village chiefs	94	0.24
Kajo-keji	State authorities	11	0.03
Kajo-keji	Payam authorities	25	0.06
Bor South	Police	184	0.43
Bor South	Statutory courts	3	0.01
Bor South	Village chiefs	77	0.18
Bor South	State authorities	121	0.28
Bor South	Payam authorities	36	0.08
Bor South	State military	5	0.01
Bor South	Other:	3	0.01

Q9.8 How much do you think the following policies would contribute to long-term peace in South Sudan, on a scale from 1 through 5 where 1 means “makes peace much less likely” and 5 means “makes peace much more likely.”

1 - Makes peace much less likely 2 - Makes peace less likely 3 - Has no effect on peace 4 - Makes peace more likely 5 - Makes peace much more likely

Q9.8.1 Dialogues between community members

Entire sample

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
Makes peace more likely	1850	0.50
Makes peace much more likely	1247	0.34
Makes peace less likely	281	0.08
Has no effect on peace	160	0.04
Makes peace much less likely	139	0.04
Prefer not to answer	8	0.00

By county

Q1.5_County	Q9.8.1	answers	percentage
Yei	Has no effect on peace	19	0.05
Yei	Makes peace less likely	44	0.11
Yei	Makes peace more likely	278	0.68
Yei	Makes peace much less likely	6	0.01
Yei	Makes peace much more likely	63	0.15
Wau	Has no effect on peace	11	0.03
Wau	Makes peace less likely	30	0.07
Wau	Makes peace more likely	173	0.43
Wau	Makes peace much less likely	30	0.07
Wau	Makes peace much more likely	154	0.38
Wau	Prefer not to answer	4	0.01
Rubkona	Has no effect on peace	4	0.01
Rubkona	Makes peace less likely	36	0.09
Rubkona	Makes peace more likely	120	0.30
Rubkona	Makes peace much less likely	35	0.09
Rubkona	Makes peace much more likely	204	0.51
Rubkona	Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Pibor	Has no effect on peace	49	0.12
Pibor	Makes peace less likely	46	0.11
Pibor	Makes peace more likely	234	0.57
Pibor	Makes peace much less likely	12	0.03
Pibor	Makes peace much more likely	65	0.16
Pibor	Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Morobo	Has no effect on peace	15	0.04
Morobo	Makes peace less likely	40	0.10
Morobo	Makes peace more likely	172	0.43
Morobo	Makes peace much less likely	29	0.07
Morobo	Makes peace much more likely	148	0.37
Malakal	Has no effect on peace	23	0.05
Malakal	Makes peace less likely	34	0.08
Malakal	Makes peace more likely	287	0.68
Malakal	Makes peace much less likely	1	0.00
Malakal	Makes peace much more likely	76	0.18
Lainya	Has no effect on peace	21	0.05
Lainya	Makes peace less likely	41	0.10
Lainya	Makes peace more likely	193	0.47
Lainya	Makes peace much less likely	12	0.03
Lainya	Makes peace much more likely	146	0.35
Lainya	Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Kajo-keji	Has no effect on peace	17	0.04
Kajo-keji	Makes peace less likely	7	0.02
Kajo-keji	Makes peace more likely	194	0.49
Kajo-keji	Makes peace much less likely	1	0.00
Kajo-keji	Makes peace much more likely	178	0.45
Kajo-keji	Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Bor South	Has no effect on peace	1	0.00
Bor South	Makes peace less likely	3	0.01
Bor South	Makes peace more likely	199	0.46
Bor South	Makes peace much less likely	13	0.03
Bor South	Makes peace much more likely	213	0.50

Q9.8.2 Dialogues between representatives of the military and representatives of non-state armed groups

Entire sample

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
Makes peace more likely	1781	0.48
Makes peace much more likely	1208	0.33
Makes peace less likely	291	0.08
Has no effect on peace	253	0.07
Makes peace much less likely	141	0.04
Prefer not to answer	11	0.00

By county

Q1.5_County	Q9.8.2	answers	percentage
Yei	Has no effect on peace	40	0.10
Yei	Makes peace less likely	43	0.10
Yei	Makes peace more likely	247	0.60
Yei	Makes peace much less likely	11	0.03
Yei	Makes peace much more likely	69	0.17
Wau	Has no effect on peace	25	0.06
Wau	Makes peace less likely	41	0.10
Wau	Makes peace more likely	207	0.51
Wau	Makes peace much less likely	14	0.03
Wau	Makes peace much more likely	111	0.28
Wau	Prefer not to answer	4	0.01
Rubkona	Has no effect on peace	13	0.03
Rubkona	Makes peace less likely	34	0.09
Rubkona	Makes peace more likely	141	0.35
Rubkona	Makes peace much less likely	34	0.09
Rubkona	Makes peace much more likely	177	0.44
Rubkona	Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Pibor	Has no effect on peace	65	0.16
Pibor	Makes peace less likely	39	0.10
Pibor	Makes peace more likely	218	0.54
Pibor	Makes peace much less likely	25	0.06
Pibor	Makes peace much more likely	59	0.14
Pibor	Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Morobo	Has no effect on peace	34	0.08
Morobo	Makes peace less likely	31	0.08
Morobo	Makes peace more likely	140	0.35
Morobo	Makes peace much less likely	17	0.04
Morobo	Makes peace much more likely	181	0.45
Morobo	Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Malakal	Has no effect on peace	18	0.04
Malakal	Makes peace less likely	44	0.10
Malakal	Makes peace more likely	280	0.67
Malakal	Makes peace much less likely	12	0.03
Malakal	Makes peace much more likely	67	0.16
Lainya	Has no effect on peace	31	0.07
Lainya	Makes peace less likely	33	0.08
Lainya	Makes peace more likely	188	0.45
Lainya	Makes peace much less likely	12	0.03
Lainya	Makes peace much more likely	150	0.36
Kajo-keji	Has no effect on peace	19	0.05
Kajo-keji	Makes peace less likely	18	0.05
Kajo-keji	Makes peace more likely	171	0.43
Kajo-keji	Makes peace much less likely	7	0.02
Kajo-keji	Makes peace much more likely	179	0.45
Kajo-keji	Prefer not to answer	4	0.01
Bor South	Has no effect on peace	8	0.02
Bor South	Makes peace less likely	8	0.02
Bor South	Makes peace more likely	189	0.44
Bor South	Makes peace much less likely	9	0.02
Bor South	Makes peace much more likely	215	0.50

Q9.8.3 Inclusion of more WOMEN in dialogues, community leadership, or resource management committees

Entire sample

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
Makes peace more likely	1707	0.46
Makes peace much more likely	1369	0.37
Has no effect on peace	262	0.07
Makes peace less likely	223	0.06
Makes peace much less likely	112	0.03
Prefer not to answer	12	0.00

By county

Q1.5_County	Q9.8.3	answers	percentage
Yei	Has no effect on peace	26	0.06
Yei	Makes peace less likely	34	0.08
Yei	Makes peace more likely	245	0.60
Yei	Makes peace much less likely	4	0.01
Yei	Makes peace much more likely	101	0.25
Wau	Has no effect on peace	7	0.02
Wau	Makes peace less likely	28	0.07
Wau	Makes peace more likely	159	0.40
Wau	Makes peace much less likely	18	0.04
Wau	Makes peace much more likely	184	0.46
Wau	Prefer not to answer	6	0.01
Rubkona	Has no effect on peace	12	0.03
Rubkona	Makes peace less likely	43	0.11
Rubkona	Makes peace more likely	118	0.30
Rubkona	Makes peace much less likely	22	0.06
Rubkona	Makes peace much more likely	204	0.51
Rubkona	Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Pibor	Has no effect on peace	55	0.14
Pibor	Makes peace less likely	28	0.07
Pibor	Makes peace more likely	211	0.52
Pibor	Makes peace much less likely	27	0.07
Pibor	Makes peace much more likely	86	0.21
Morobo	Has no effect on peace	60	0.15
Morobo	Makes peace less likely	28	0.07
Morobo	Makes peace more likely	146	0.36
Morobo	Makes peace much less likely	24	0.06
Morobo	Makes peace much more likely	146	0.36
Malakal	Has no effect on peace	21	0.05
Malakal	Makes peace less likely	4	0.01
Malakal	Makes peace more likely	255	0.61
Malakal	Makes peace much more likely	141	0.33
Lainya	Has no effect on peace	29	0.07
Lainya	Makes peace less likely	26	0.06
Lainya	Makes peace more likely	231	0.56
Lainya	Makes peace much less likely	6	0.01
Lainya	Makes peace much more likely	122	0.29
Kajo-keji	Has no effect on peace	50	0.13
Kajo-keji	Makes peace less likely	28	0.07
Kajo-keji	Makes peace more likely	179	0.45
Kajo-keji	Makes peace much less likely	1	0.00
Kajo-keji	Makes peace much more likely	136	0.34
Kajo-keji	Prefer not to answer	4	0.01
Bor South	Has no effect on peace	2	0.00
Bor South	Makes peace less likely	4	0.01
Bor South	Makes peace more likely	163	0.38
Bor South	Makes peace much less likely	10	0.02
Bor South	Makes peace much more likely	249	0.58
Bor South	Prefer not to answer	1	0.00

Q9.8.4 Inclusion of more YOUTH in dialogues, community leadership, or resource management committees

Entire sample

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
Makes peace more likely	1703	0.46
Makes peace much more likely	1403	0.38
Makes peace less likely	259	0.07
Has no effect on peace	200	0.05
Makes peace much less likely	109	0.03
Prefer not to answer	11	0.00

By county

Q1.5_County	Q9.8.4	answers	percentage
Yei	Has no effect on peace	17	0.04
Yei	Makes peace less likely	36	0.09
Yei	Makes peace more likely	239	0.58
Yei	Makes peace much less likely	8	0.02
Yei	Makes peace much more likely	110	0.27
Wau	Has no effect on peace	9	0.02
Wau	Makes peace less likely	37	0.09
Wau	Makes peace more likely	180	0.45
Wau	Makes peace much less likely	17	0.04
Wau	Makes peace much more likely	154	0.38
Wau	Prefer not to answer	5	0.01
Rubkona	Has no effect on peace	5	0.01
Rubkona	Makes peace less likely	39	0.10
Rubkona	Makes peace more likely	121	0.30
Rubkona	Makes peace much less likely	19	0.05
Rubkona	Makes peace much more likely	215	0.54
Rubkona	Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Pibor	Has no effect on peace	41	0.10
Pibor	Makes peace less likely	29	0.07
Pibor	Makes peace more likely	220	0.54
Pibor	Makes peace much less likely	18	0.04
Pibor	Makes peace much more likely	99	0.24
Morobo	Has no effect on peace	26	0.06
Morobo	Makes peace less likely	30	0.07
Morobo	Makes peace more likely	149	0.37
Morobo	Makes peace much less likely	29	0.07
Morobo	Makes peace much more likely	170	0.42
Malakal	Has no effect on peace	19	0.05
Malakal	Makes peace less likely	26	0.06
Malakal	Makes peace more likely	239	0.57
Malakal	Makes peace much less likely	1	0.00
Malakal	Makes peace much more likely	136	0.32
Lainya	Has no effect on peace	33	0.08
Lainya	Makes peace less likely	27	0.07
Lainya	Makes peace more likely	217	0.52
Lainya	Makes peace much less likely	8	0.02
Lainya	Makes peace much more likely	129	0.31
Kajo-keji	Has no effect on peace	47	0.12
Kajo-keji	Makes peace less likely	29	0.07
Kajo-keji	Makes peace more likely	184	0.46
Kajo-keji	Makes peace much less likely	2	0.01
Kajo-keji	Makes peace much more likely	131	0.33
Kajo-keji	Prefer not to answer	5	0.01
Bor South	Has no effect on peace	3	0.01
Bor South	Makes peace less likely	6	0.01
Bor South	Makes peace more likely	154	0.36
Bor South	Makes peace much less likely	7	0.02
Bor South	Makes peace much more likely	259	0.60

Q9.8.5 Confessions by perpetrators of violence or crimes

Entire sample

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
Makes peace more likely	1487	0.40
Makes peace much more likely	1455	0.39
Makes peace less likely	314	0.09
Has no effect on peace	267	0.07
Makes peace much less likely	122	0.03
Prefer not to answer	40	0.01

By county

Q1.5_County	Q9.8.5	answers	percentage
Yei	Has no effect on peace	31	0.08
Yei	Makes peace less likely	21	0.05
Yei	Makes peace more likely	201	0.49
Yei	Makes peace much less likely	3	0.01
Yei	Makes peace much more likely	153	0.37
Yei	Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Wau	Has no effect on peace	12	0.03
Wau	Makes peace less likely	41	0.10
Wau	Makes peace more likely	150	0.37
Wau	Makes peace much less likely	24	0.06
Wau	Makes peace much more likely	162	0.40
Wau	Prefer not to answer	13	0.03
Rubkona	Has no effect on peace	27	0.07
Rubkona	Makes peace less likely	30	0.07
Rubkona	Makes peace more likely	92	0.23
Rubkona	Makes peace much less likely	21	0.05
Rubkona	Makes peace much more likely	229	0.57
Rubkona	Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Pibor	Has no effect on peace	52	0.13
Pibor	Makes peace less likely	47	0.12
Pibor	Makes peace more likely	176	0.43
Pibor	Makes peace much less likely	28	0.07
Pibor	Makes peace much more likely	102	0.25
Pibor	Prefer not to answer	2	0.00
Morobo	Has no effect on peace	38	0.09
Morobo	Makes peace less likely	35	0.09
Morobo	Makes peace more likely	129	0.32
Morobo	Makes peace much less likely	12	0.03
Morobo	Makes peace much more likely	190	0.47
Malakal	Has no effect on peace	26	0.06
Malakal	Makes peace less likely	64	0.15
Malakal	Makes peace more likely	238	0.57
Malakal	Makes peace much more likely	93	0.22
Lainya	Has no effect on peace	45	0.11
Lainya	Makes peace less likely	23	0.06
Lainya	Makes peace more likely	180	0.43
Lainya	Makes peace much less likely	9	0.02
Lainya	Makes peace much more likely	154	0.37
Lainya	Prefer not to answer	3	0.01
Kajo-keji	Has no effect on peace	20	0.05
Kajo-keji	Makes peace less likely	27	0.07
Kajo-keji	Makes peace more likely	160	0.40
Kajo-keji	Makes peace much less likely	7	0.02
Kajo-keji	Makes peace much more likely	166	0.42
Kajo-keji	Prefer not to answer	18	0.05
Bor South	Has no effect on peace	16	0.04
Bor South	Makes peace less likely	26	0.06
Bor South	Makes peace more likely	161	0.38
Bor South	Makes peace much less likely	18	0.04
Bor South	Makes peace much more likely	206	0.48
Bor South	Prefer not to answer	2	0.00

Q9.8.6 Apologies by perpetrators of violence or crimes

Entire sample

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
Makes peace more likely	1689	0.46
Makes peace much more likely	1219	0.33
Makes peace less likely	337	0.09
Has no effect on peace	263	0.07
Makes peace much less likely	148	0.04
Prefer not to answer	29	0.01

By county

Q1.5_County	Q9.8.6	answers	percentage
Yei	Has no effect on peace	28	0.07
Yei	Makes peace less likely	24	0.06
Yei	Makes peace more likely	243	0.59
Yei	Makes peace much less likely	5	0.01
Yei	Makes peace much more likely	110	0.27
Wau	Has no effect on peace	16	0.04
Wau	Makes peace less likely	49	0.12
Wau	Makes peace more likely	173	0.43
Wau	Makes peace much less likely	19	0.05
Wau	Makes peace much more likely	136	0.34
Wau	Prefer not to answer	9	0.02
Rubkona	Has no effect on peace	13	0.03
Rubkona	Makes peace less likely	42	0.10
Rubkona	Makes peace more likely	120	0.30
Rubkona	Makes peace much less likely	29	0.07
Rubkona	Makes peace much more likely	195	0.49
Rubkona	Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Pibor	Has no effect on peace	57	0.14
Pibor	Makes peace less likely	50	0.12
Pibor	Makes peace more likely	183	0.45
Pibor	Makes peace much less likely	36	0.09
Pibor	Makes peace much more likely	79	0.19
Pibor	Prefer not to answer	2	0.00
Morobo	Has no effect on peace	37	0.09
Morobo	Makes peace less likely	46	0.11
Morobo	Makes peace more likely	130	0.32
Morobo	Makes peace much less likely	23	0.06
Morobo	Makes peace much more likely	168	0.42
Malakal	Has no effect on peace	18	0.04
Malakal	Makes peace less likely	54	0.13
Malakal	Makes peace more likely	281	0.67
Malakal	Makes peace much less likely	2	0.00
Malakal	Makes peace much more likely	66	0.16
Lainya	Has no effect on peace	34	0.08
Lainya	Makes peace less likely	22	0.05
Lainya	Makes peace more likely	199	0.48
Lainya	Makes peace much less likely	12	0.03
Lainya	Makes peace much more likely	144	0.35
Lainya	Prefer not to answer	3	0.01
Kajo-keji	Has no effect on peace	29	0.07
Kajo-keji	Makes peace less likely	28	0.07
Kajo-keji	Makes peace more likely	174	0.44
Kajo-keji	Makes peace much less likely	7	0.02
Kajo-keji	Makes peace much more likely	146	0.37
Kajo-keji	Prefer not to answer	14	0.04
Bor South	Has no effect on peace	31	0.07
Bor South	Makes peace less likely	22	0.05
Bor South	Makes peace more likely	186	0.43
Bor South	Makes peace much less likely	15	0.03
Bor South	Makes peace much more likely	175	0.41

Q9.8.7 Rehabilitation programs for perpetrators of violence or crimes

Entire sample

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
Makes peace more likely	1764	0.48
Makes peace much more likely	1113	0.30
Makes peace less likely	383	0.10
Has no effect on peace	234	0.06
Makes peace much less likely	169	0.05
Prefer not to answer	22	0.01

By county

Q1.5_County	Q9.8.7	answers	percentage
Yei	Has no effect on peace	23	0.06
Yei	Makes peace less likely	37	0.09
Yei	Makes peace more likely	257	0.63
Yei	Makes peace much less likely	5	0.01
Yei	Makes peace much more likely	88	0.21
Wau	Has no effect on peace	17	0.04
Wau	Makes peace less likely	36	0.09
Wau	Makes peace more likely	184	0.46
Wau	Makes peace much less likely	23	0.06
Wau	Makes peace much more likely	135	0.34
Wau	Prefer not to answer	7	0.02
Rubkona	Has no effect on peace	9	0.02
Rubkona	Makes peace less likely	59	0.15
Rubkona	Makes peace more likely	123	0.31
Rubkona	Makes peace much less likely	31	0.08
Rubkona	Makes peace much more likely	177	0.44
Rubkona	Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Pibor	Has no effect on peace	65	0.16
Pibor	Makes peace less likely	53	0.13
Pibor	Makes peace more likely	187	0.46
Pibor	Makes peace much less likely	34	0.08
Pibor	Makes peace much more likely	67	0.16
Pibor	Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Morobo	Has no effect on peace	25	0.06
Morobo	Makes peace less likely	48	0.12
Morobo	Makes peace more likely	140	0.35
Morobo	Makes peace much less likely	33	0.08
Morobo	Makes peace much more likely	158	0.39
Malakal	Has no effect on peace	21	0.05
Malakal	Makes peace less likely	63	0.15
Malakal	Makes peace more likely	259	0.62
Malakal	Makes peace much less likely	3	0.01
Malakal	Makes peace much more likely	75	0.18
Lainya	Has no effect on peace	32	0.08
Lainya	Makes peace less likely	33	0.08
Lainya	Makes peace more likely	214	0.52
Lainya	Makes peace much less likely	12	0.03
Lainya	Makes peace much more likely	122	0.29
Lainya	Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Kajo-keji	Has no effect on peace	20	0.05
Kajo-keji	Makes peace less likely	34	0.09
Kajo-keji	Makes peace more likely	191	0.48
Kajo-keji	Makes peace much less likely	8	0.02
Kajo-keji	Makes peace much more likely	133	0.33
Kajo-keji	Prefer not to answer	12	0.03
Bor South	Has no effect on peace	22	0.05
Bor South	Makes peace less likely	20	0.05
Bor South	Makes peace more likely	209	0.49
Bor South	Makes peace much less likely	20	0.05
Bor South	Makes peace much more likely	158	0.37

Q9.8.8 Criminal prosecutions for perpetrators of violence or crimes

Entire sample

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
Makes peace more likely	1534	0.42
Makes peace much more likely	1341	0.36
Makes peace less likely	362	0.10
Has no effect on peace	251	0.07
Makes peace much less likely	152	0.04
Prefer not to answer	45	0.01

By county

Q1.5_County	Q9.8.8	answers	percentage
Yei	Has no effect on peace	29	0.07
Yei	Makes peace less likely	24	0.06
Yei	Makes peace more likely	212	0.52
Yei	Makes peace much less likely	6	0.01
Yei	Makes peace much more likely	139	0.34
Wau	Has no effect on peace	18	0.04
Wau	Makes peace less likely	46	0.11
Wau	Makes peace more likely	164	0.41
Wau	Makes peace much less likely	24	0.06
Wau	Makes peace much more likely	125	0.31
Wau	Prefer not to answer	25	0.06
Rubkona	Has no effect on peace	12	0.03
Rubkona	Makes peace less likely	53	0.13
Rubkona	Makes peace more likely	100	0.25
Rubkona	Makes peace much less likely	27	0.07
Rubkona	Makes peace much more likely	207	0.52
Rubkona	Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Pibor	Has no effect on peace	68	0.17
Pibor	Makes peace less likely	47	0.12
Pibor	Makes peace more likely	186	0.46
Pibor	Makes peace much less likely	25	0.06
Pibor	Makes peace much more likely	80	0.20
Pibor	Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Morobo	Has no effect on peace	36	0.09
Morobo	Makes peace less likely	36	0.09
Morobo	Makes peace more likely	121	0.30
Morobo	Makes peace much less likely	24	0.06
Morobo	Makes peace much more likely	187	0.46
Malakal	Has no effect on peace	32	0.08
Malakal	Makes peace less likely	56	0.13
Malakal	Makes peace more likely	248	0.59
Malakal	Makes peace much less likely	7	0.02
Malakal	Makes peace much more likely	78	0.19
Lainya	Has no effect on peace	35	0.08
Lainya	Makes peace less likely	29	0.07
Lainya	Makes peace more likely	184	0.44
Lainya	Makes peace much less likely	15	0.04
Lainya	Makes peace much more likely	147	0.36
Lainya	Prefer not to answer	4	0.01
Kajo-keji	Has no effect on peace	20	0.05
Kajo-keji	Makes peace less likely	49	0.12
Kajo-keji	Makes peace more likely	163	0.41
Kajo-keji	Makes peace much less likely	10	0.03
Kajo-keji	Makes peace much more likely	142	0.36
Kajo-keji	Prefer not to answer	14	0.04
Bor South	Has no effect on peace	1	0.00
Bor South	Makes peace less likely	22	0.05
Bor South	Makes peace more likely	156	0.36
Bor South	Makes peace much less likely	14	0.03
Bor South	Makes peace much more likely	236	0.55

Q9.8.9 A commission to discover the truth about the conflict

Entire sample

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
Makes peace more likely	1626	0.44
Makes peace much more likely	1322	0.36
Makes peace less likely	326	0.09
Has no effect on peace	248	0.07
Makes peace much less likely	136	0.04
Prefer not to answer	27	0.01

By county

Q1.5_County	Q9.8.9	answers	percentage
Yei	Has no effect on peace	22	0.05
Yei	Makes peace less likely	30	0.07
Yei	Makes peace more likely	259	0.63
Yei	Makes peace much less likely	6	0.01
Yei	Makes peace much more likely	93	0.23
Wau	Has no effect on peace	17	0.04
Wau	Makes peace less likely	47	0.12
Wau	Makes peace more likely	188	0.47
Wau	Makes peace much less likely	27	0.07
Wau	Makes peace much more likely	115	0.29
Wau	Prefer not to answer	8	0.02
Rubkona	Has no effect on peace	4	0.01
Rubkona	Makes peace less likely	44	0.11
Rubkona	Makes peace more likely	92	0.23
Rubkona	Makes peace much less likely	28	0.07
Rubkona	Makes peace much more likely	232	0.58
Pibor	Has no effect on peace	62	0.15
Pibor	Makes peace less likely	33	0.08
Pibor	Makes peace more likely	183	0.45
Pibor	Makes peace much less likely	17	0.04
Pibor	Makes peace much more likely	111	0.27
Pibor	Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Morobo	Has no effect on peace	45	0.11
Morobo	Makes peace less likely	38	0.09
Morobo	Makes peace more likely	142	0.35
Morobo	Makes peace much less likely	26	0.06
Morobo	Makes peace much more likely	153	0.38
Malakal	Has no effect on peace	17	0.04
Malakal	Makes peace less likely	62	0.15
Malakal	Makes peace more likely	230	0.55
Malakal	Makes peace much less likely	7	0.02
Malakal	Makes peace much more likely	105	0.25
Lainya	Has no effect on peace	50	0.12
Lainya	Makes peace less likely	30	0.07
Lainya	Makes peace more likely	195	0.47
Lainya	Makes peace much less likely	6	0.01
Lainya	Makes peace much more likely	132	0.32
Lainya	Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Kajo-keji	Has no effect on peace	23	0.06
Kajo-keji	Makes peace less likely	34	0.09
Kajo-keji	Makes peace more likely	144	0.36
Kajo-keji	Makes peace much less likely	3	0.01
Kajo-keji	Makes peace much more likely	177	0.44
Kajo-keji	Prefer not to answer	17	0.04
Bor South	Has no effect on peace	8	0.02
Bor South	Makes peace less likely	8	0.02
Bor South	Makes peace more likely	193	0.45
Bor South	Makes peace much less likely	16	0.04
Bor South	Makes peace much more likely	204	0.48

Q9.8.10 A museum about the conflict

Entire sample

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
Makes peace more likely	1524	0.41
Makes peace much more likely	972	0.26
Makes peace less likely	449	0.12
Has no effect on peace	441	0.12
Makes peace much less likely	201	0.05
Prefer not to answer	98	0.03

By county

Q1.5_County	Q9.8.10	answers	percentage
Yei	Has no effect on peace	39	0.10
Yei	Makes peace less likely	49	0.12
Yei	Makes peace more likely	235	0.57
Yei	Makes peace much less likely	10	0.02
Yei	Makes peace much more likely	76	0.19
Yei	Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Wau	Has no effect on peace	18	0.04
Wau	Makes peace less likely	31	0.08
Wau	Makes peace more likely	141	0.35
Wau	Makes peace much less likely	34	0.08
Wau	Makes peace much more likely	119	0.30
Wau	Prefer not to answer	59	0.15
Rubkona	Has no effect on peace	9	0.02
Rubkona	Makes peace less likely	58	0.14
Rubkona	Makes peace more likely	123	0.31
Rubkona	Makes peace much less likely	33	0.08
Rubkona	Makes peace much more likely	176	0.44
Rubkona	Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Pibor	Has no effect on peace	78	0.19
Pibor	Makes peace less likely	44	0.11
Pibor	Makes peace more likely	171	0.42
Pibor	Makes peace much less likely	32	0.08
Pibor	Makes peace much more likely	74	0.18
Pibor	Prefer not to answer	8	0.02
Morobo	Has no effect on peace	77	0.19
Morobo	Makes peace less likely	80	0.20
Morobo	Makes peace more likely	98	0.24
Morobo	Makes peace much less likely	38	0.09
Morobo	Makes peace much more likely	108	0.27
Morobo	Prefer not to answer	3	0.01
Malakal	Has no effect on peace	34	0.08
Malakal	Makes peace less likely	66	0.16
Malakal	Makes peace more likely	246	0.58
Malakal	Makes peace much less likely	5	0.01
Malakal	Makes peace much more likely	70	0.17
Lainya	Has no effect on peace	75	0.18
Lainya	Makes peace less likely	48	0.12
Lainya	Makes peace more likely	167	0.40
Lainya	Makes peace much less likely	18	0.04
Lainya	Makes peace much more likely	101	0.24
Lainya	Prefer not to answer	5	0.01
Kajo-keji	Has no effect on peace	48	0.12
Kajo-keji	Makes peace less likely	41	0.10
Kajo-keji	Makes peace more likely	161	0.40
Kajo-keji	Makes peace much less likely	16	0.04
Kajo-keji	Makes peace much more likely	111	0.28
Kajo-keji	Prefer not to answer	21	0.05
Bor South	Has no effect on peace	63	0.15
Bor South	Makes peace less likely	32	0.07
Bor South	Makes peace more likely	182	0.42
Bor South	Makes peace much less likely	15	0.03
Bor South	Makes peace much more likely	137	0.32

Q9.8.11 Compensation or other reparations for victims

Entire sample

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
Makes peace more likely	1633	0.44
Makes peace much more likely	1238	0.34
Makes peace less likely	354	0.10
Has no effect on peace	253	0.07
Makes peace much less likely	157	0.04
Prefer not to answer	35	0.01
NA	15	0.00

By county

Q1.5_County	Q9.8.11	answers	percentage
Yei	Has no effect on peace	34	0.08
Yei	Makes peace less likely	31	0.08
Yei	Makes peace more likely	241	0.59
Yei	Makes peace much less likely	5	0.01
Yei	Makes peace much more likely	98	0.24
Yei	Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Wau	Has no effect on peace	12	0.03
Wau	Makes peace less likely	60	0.15
Wau	Makes peace more likely	162	0.40
Wau	Makes peace much less likely	29	0.07
Wau	Makes peace much more likely	129	0.32
Wau	Prefer not to answer	7	0.02
Wau	NA	3	0.01
Rubkona	Has no effect on peace	4	0.01
Rubkona	Makes peace less likely	35	0.09
Rubkona	Makes peace more likely	116	0.29
Rubkona	Makes peace much less likely	32	0.08
Rubkona	Makes peace much more likely	211	0.53
Rubkona	Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Rubkona	NA	1	0.00
Pibor	Has no effect on peace	66	0.16
Pibor	Makes peace less likely	46	0.11
Pibor	Makes peace more likely	197	0.48
Pibor	Makes peace much less likely	19	0.05
Pibor	Makes peace much more likely	77	0.19
Pibor	Prefer not to answer	2	0.00
Morobo	Has no effect on peace	42	0.10
Morobo	Makes peace less likely	37	0.09
Morobo	Makes peace more likely	126	0.31
Morobo	Makes peace much less likely	26	0.06
Morobo	Makes peace much more likely	170	0.42
Morobo	NA	3	0.01
Malakal	Has no effect on peace	24	0.06
Malakal	Makes peace less likely	63	0.15
Malakal	Makes peace more likely	261	0.62
Malakal	Makes peace much less likely	1	0.00
Malakal	Makes peace much more likely	72	0.17
Lainya	Has no effect on peace	45	0.11
Lainya	Makes peace less likely	32	0.08
Lainya	Makes peace more likely	180	0.43
Lainya	Makes peace much less likely	14	0.03
Lainya	Makes peace much more likely	142	0.34
Lainya	Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Kajo-keji	Has no effect on peace	24	0.06
Kajo-keji	Makes peace less likely	41	0.10
Kajo-keji	Makes peace more likely	154	0.39
Kajo-keji	Makes peace much less likely	16	0.04
Kajo-keji	Makes peace much more likely	133	0.33
Kajo-keji	Prefer not to answer	23	0.06
Kajo-keji	NA	7	0.02
Bor South	Has no effect on peace	2	0.00
Bor South	Makes peace less likely	9	0.02
Bor South	Makes peace more likely	196	0.46
Bor South	Makes peace much less likely	15	0.03
Bor South	Makes peace much more likely	206	0.48
Bor South	NA	1	0.00

Q9.8.12 Draft a new permanent constitution

Entire sample

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
Makes peace more likely	1466	0.40
Makes peace much more likely	1350	0.37
Has no effect on peace	338	0.09
Makes peace less likely	312	0.08
Makes peace much less likely	155	0.04
Prefer not to answer	45	0.01
NA	19	0.01

By county

Q1.5_County	Q9.8.12	answers	percentage
Yei	Has no effect on peace	35	0.09
Yei	Makes peace less likely	26	0.06
Yei	Makes peace more likely	206	0.50
Yei	Makes peace much less likely	6	0.01
Yei	Makes peace much more likely	132	0.32
Yei	Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Yei	NA	4	0.01
Wau	Has no effect on peace	19	0.05
Wau	Makes peace less likely	22	0.05
Wau	Makes peace more likely	157	0.39
Wau	Makes peace much less likely	35	0.09
Wau	Makes peace much more likely	139	0.35
Wau	Prefer not to answer	25	0.06
Wau	NA	5	0.01
Rubkona	Has no effect on peace	10	0.03
Rubkona	Makes peace less likely	40	0.10
Rubkona	Makes peace more likely	74	0.18
Rubkona	Makes peace much less likely	28	0.07
Rubkona	Makes peace much more likely	247	0.62
Rubkona	Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Pibor	Has no effect on peace	60	0.15
Pibor	Makes peace less likely	37	0.09
Pibor	Makes peace more likely	176	0.43
Pibor	Makes peace much less likely	24	0.06
Pibor	Makes peace much more likely	106	0.26
Pibor	Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Pibor	NA	3	0.01
Morobo	Has no effect on peace	67	0.17
Morobo	Makes peace less likely	51	0.13
Morobo	Makes peace more likely	115	0.28
Morobo	Makes peace much less likely	20	0.05
Morobo	Makes peace much more likely	149	0.37
Morobo	NA	2	0.00
Malakal	Has no effect on peace	45	0.11
Malakal	Makes peace less likely	19	0.05
Malakal	Makes peace more likely	280	0.67
Malakal	Makes peace much more likely	75	0.18
Malakal	NA	2	0.00
Lainya	Has no effect on peace	62	0.15
Lainya	Makes peace less likely	42	0.10
Lainya	Makes peace more likely	169	0.41
Lainya	Makes peace much less likely	20	0.05
Lainya	Makes peace much more likely	116	0.28
Lainya	Prefer not to answer	4	0.01
Lainya	NA	1	0.00
Kajo-keji	Has no effect on peace	33	0.08
Kajo-keji	Makes peace less likely	45	0.11
Kajo-keji	Makes peace more likely	117	0.29
Kajo-keji	Makes peace much less likely	7	0.02
Kajo-keji	Makes peace much more likely	183	0.46
Kajo-keji	Prefer not to answer	12	0.03
Kajo-keji	NA	1	0.00
Bor South	Has no effect on peace	7	0.02
Bor South	Makes peace less likely	30	0.07
Bor South	Makes peace more likely	172	0.40
Bor South	Makes peace much less likely	15	0.03
Bor South	Makes peace much more likely	203	0.47
Bor South	Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Bor South	NA	1	0.00

Q9.9 Which actors should be involved in efforts to bring peace to the communities? (mark all that apply)

1. Community members
2. Religious leaders
3. Government authorities (at county, payam level)
4. Army
5. Community leaders
6. NGOs / UN
7. Others: _______ -2. Prefer not to answer

Answers are the list of the top 10 chosen combinations

Entire sample

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
Community members 2. Religious leaders 3. Government authorities (at county, payam level) 4. Army 5. Community leaders 6. NGOs / UN	400	0.11
Community members 2. Religious leaders 3. Government authorities (at county, payam level) 5. Community leaders 6. NGOs / UN	150	0.04
NGOs / UN	131	0.04
Religious leaders	110	0.03
Community members	107	0.03
Community members 2. Religious leaders 5. Community leaders	89	0.02
Government authorities (at county, payam level)	73	0.02
Community members 2. Religious leaders 3. Government authorities (at county, payam level) 5. Community leaders	68	0.02
Community members 2. Religious leaders 4. Army 5. Community leaders	49	0.01
Community members 2. Religious leaders 3. Government authorities (at county, payam level) 4. Army 5. Community leaders	43	0.01

Political/Legal Issue: Transitional Justice

Q9.6 Imagine that a person from outside this community stole cattle from your family. Who would you be most likely to seek help from?

Entire sample

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
It is better to avoid speaking publicly about what happened during the conflict	2123	0.58
It is better for people to speak publicly about what happened during the conflict	1450	0.39
_2. Prefer not to answer	112	0.03

By county

Q1.5_County	Q9.6.	answers	percentage
Yei	It is better for people to speak publicly about what happened during the conflict	204	0.50
Yei	It is better to avoid speaking publicly about what happened during the conflict	204	0.50
Yei	_2. Prefer not to answer	2	0.00
Wau	It is better for people to speak publicly about what happened during the conflict	138	0.34
Wau	It is better to avoid speaking publicly about what happened during the conflict	206	0.51
Wau	_2. Prefer not to answer	58	0.14
Rubkona	It is better for people to speak publicly about what happened during the conflict	193	0.48
Rubkona	It is better to avoid speaking publicly about what happened during the conflict	200	0.50
Rubkona	_2. Prefer not to answer	7	0.02
Pibor	It is better for people to speak publicly about what happened during the conflict	195	0.48
Pibor	It is better to avoid speaking publicly about what happened during the conflict	211	0.52
Pibor	_2. Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Morobo	It is better for people to speak publicly about what happened during the conflict	154	0.38
Morobo	It is better to avoid speaking publicly about what happened during the conflict	250	0.62
Malakal	It is better for people to speak publicly about what happened during the conflict	83	0.20
Malakal	It is better to avoid speaking publicly about what happened during the conflict	329	0.78
Malakal	_2. Prefer not to answer	9	0.02
Lainya	It is better for people to speak publicly about what happened during the conflict	192	0.46
Lainya	It is better to avoid speaking publicly about what happened during the conflict	202	0.49
Lainya	_2. Prefer not to answer	20	0.05
Kajo-keji	It is better for people to speak publicly about what happened during the conflict	220	0.55
Kajo-keji	It is better to avoid speaking publicly about what happened during the conflict	169	0.42
Kajo-keji	_2. Prefer not to answer	9	0.02
Bor South	It is better for people to speak publicly about what happened during the conflict	71	0.17
Bor South	It is better to avoid speaking publicly about what happened during the conflict	352	0.82
Bor South	_2. Prefer not to answer	6	0.01

Political/Legal Issue: Elections

Q10.6 The government is planning to hold elections in December 2024. Which of the following best matches your views about when the election should be held, if at all?

Entire sample

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
On time	2373	0.64
After another delay	804	0.22
Not at all	406	0.11
Prefer not to answer	102	0.03

By county

Q1.5_County	Q10.6	answers	percentage
Yei	After another delay	83	0.20
Yei	Not at all	12	0.03
Yei	On time	312	0.76
Yei	Prefer not to answer	3	0.01
Wau	After another delay	41	0.10
Wau	Not at all	10	0.02
Wau	On time	326	0.81
Wau	Prefer not to answer	25	0.06
Rubkona	After another delay	125	0.31
Rubkona	Not at all	127	0.32
Rubkona	On time	137	0.34
Rubkona	Prefer not to answer	11	0.03
Pibor	After another delay	130	0.32
Pibor	Not at all	44	0.11
Pibor	On time	232	0.57
Pibor	Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Morobo	After another delay	40	0.10
Morobo	Not at all	28	0.07
Morobo	On time	336	0.83
Malakal	After another delay	176	0.42
Malakal	Not at all	22	0.05
Malakal	On time	222	0.53
Malakal	Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Lainya	After another delay	81	0.20
Lainya	Not at all	36	0.09
Lainya	On time	285	0.69
Lainya	Prefer not to answer	12	0.03
Kajo-keji	After another delay	93	0.23
Kajo-keji	Not at all	73	0.18
Kajo-keji	On time	206	0.52
Kajo-keji	Prefer not to answer	26	0.07
Bor South	After another delay	35	0.08
Bor South	Not at all	54	0.13
Bor South	On time	317	0.74
Bor South	Prefer not to answer	23	0.05

Q10.7 Do you intend to vote in the next national elections?

Entire sample

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
Yes	2907	0.79
No	720	0.20
Prefer not to answer	58	0.02

By county

Q1.5_County	Q10.7	answers	percentage
Yei	No	46	0.11
Yei	Yes	364	0.89
Wau	No	48	0.12
Wau	Prefer not to answer	21	0.05
Wau	Yes	333	0.83
Rubkona	No	131	0.33
Rubkona	Prefer not to answer	12	0.03
Rubkona	Yes	257	0.64
Pibor	No	176	0.43
Pibor	Prefer not to answer	2	0.00
Pibor	Yes	229	0.56
Morobo	No	31	0.08
Morobo	Yes	373	0.92
Malakal	No	68	0.16
Malakal	Prefer not to answer	3	0.01
Malakal	Yes	350	0.83
Lainya	No	91	0.22
Lainya	Prefer not to answer	6	0.01
Lainya	Yes	317	0.77
Kajo-keji	No	64	0.16
Kajo-keji	Prefer not to answer	5	0.01
Kajo-keji	Yes	329	0.83
Bor South	No	65	0.15
Bor South	Prefer not to answer	9	0.02
Bor South	Yes	355	0.83

Q10.9 Do you think that the government of South Sudan is capable of holding free and fair elections?

Entire sample

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
Yes	2098	0.57
No	1333	0.36
Prefer not to answer	254	0.07

By county

Q1.5_County	Q10.9	answers	percentage
Yei	No	83	0.20
Yei	Prefer not to answer	36	0.09
Yei	Yes	291	0.71
Wau	No	112	0.28
Wau	Prefer not to answer	85	0.21
Wau	Yes	205	0.51
Rubkona	No	234	0.58
Rubkona	Prefer not to answer	7	0.02
Rubkona	Yes	159	0.40
Pibor	No	188	0.46
Pibor	Prefer not to answer	10	0.02
Pibor	Yes	209	0.51
Morobo	No	114	0.28
Morobo	Prefer not to answer	2	0.00
Morobo	Yes	288	0.71
Malakal	No	191	0.45
Malakal	Prefer not to answer	13	0.03
Malakal	Yes	217	0.52
Lainya	No	143	0.35
Lainya	Prefer not to answer	42	0.10
Lainya	Yes	229	0.55
Kajo-keji	No	128	0.32
Kajo-keji	Prefer not to answer	21	0.05
Kajo-keji	Yes	249	0.63
Bor South	No	140	0.33
Bor South	Prefer not to answer	38	0.09
Bor South	Yes	251	0.59

Q10.11 Do you think that the next national elections, if held, are more likely to have a positive or negative effect on the stability of South Sudan?

Entire sample

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
A positive effect (more stability)	1888	0.51
A negative effect (less stability)	951	0.26
No effect either way	667	0.18
Prefer not to answer	179	0.05

By county

Q1.5_County	Q10.11	answers	percentage
Yei	A negative effect (less stability)	86	0.21
Yei	A positive effect (more stability)	235	0.57
Yei	No effect either way	77	0.19
Yei	Prefer not to answer	12	0.03
Wau	A negative effect (less stability)	101	0.25
Wau	A positive effect (more stability)	205	0.51
Wau	No effect either way	35	0.09
Wau	Prefer not to answer	61	0.15
Rubkona	A negative effect (less stability)	182	0.46
Rubkona	A positive effect (more stability)	158	0.40
Rubkona	No effect either way	43	0.11
Rubkona	Prefer not to answer	17	0.04
Pibor	A negative effect (less stability)	92	0.23
Pibor	A positive effect (more stability)	154	0.38
Pibor	No effect either way	153	0.38
Pibor	Prefer not to answer	8	0.02
Morobo	A negative effect (less stability)	40	0.10
Morobo	A positive effect (more stability)	281	0.70
Morobo	No effect either way	81	0.20
Morobo	Prefer not to answer	2	0.00
Malakal	A negative effect (less stability)	168	0.40
Malakal	A positive effect (more stability)	144	0.34
Malakal	No effect either way	104	0.25
Malakal	Prefer not to answer	5	0.01
Lainya	A negative effect (less stability)	90	0.22
Lainya	A positive effect (more stability)	235	0.57
Lainya	No effect either way	71	0.17
Lainya	Prefer not to answer	18	0.04
Kajo-keji	A negative effect (less stability)	125	0.31
Kajo-keji	A positive effect (more stability)	200	0.50
Kajo-keji	No effect either way	49	0.12
Kajo-keji	Prefer not to answer	24	0.06
Bor South	A negative effect (less stability)	67	0.16
Bor South	A positive effect (more stability)	276	0.64
Bor South	No effect either way	54	0.13
Bor South	Prefer not to answer	32	0.07

9) Environmental Fragility

All the answers are in a scale of 0-1, i.e. can have the following values: 0, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1. The higher, the more fragile.

The higher, the more fragile.

Ex: 0 = Not severe at all 0.25 = Not severe 0.50 = Somewhat severe 0.75 = Severe 1 = Extremely severe

Index Questions

Q11.10A Many people in South Sudan have experienced the following: too much rain, too little rain, temperatures that are too high, temperatures that are too low, pests and crop diseases, and deforestation and erosion. How severe would you say the impact of any of these experiences have been on your household income, on a scale from 1 to 5 where 1 means “not severe at all and 5 means “extremely severe?”

1. High perception of severity : Most respondents perceive the environmental impact as either “Severe” or “Somewhat Severe,” indicating a widespread recognition of environmental issues on income among households.
2. High Concern Level: Respondents selected “Severe”. This suggests that many households feel the impact on income is significantly affecting them.
3. Moderate and Low Impact: Fewer respondents classify the impact as “Not Severe” or “Not Severe at all (no impact),” reflecting that a smaller portion of the population perceives a lower level of environmental impact.
4. Minimal Indifference: Very few respondents chose “Prefer not to answer,” implying that most households have a clear stance on the issue, likely due to direct experiences with environmental challenges.
5. Impact perception by County : Bor South (0.73) and Rubkona (0.70) exhibit the highest mean responses (perception mean for the entire sample = 0.58), suggesting that households in these counties perceive a stronger environmental impact on income compared to other regions. Conclusion: Data show a significant distribution towards severity (with a negligible share of “no impact” respondents). This indicates that environmental issues are critical concerns in South Sudanese households income and people are aware of them.

Entire sample

mean
0.58

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
Somewhat severe	1159	0.31
Severe	1100	0.30
Extremely severe	568	0.15
Not severe	500	0.14
Not severe at all (no impact)	315	0.09
_2. Prefer not to answer	43	0.01

By county

County	Mean Response (0 to 1)
Bor South	0.73
Kajo-keji	0.55
Lainya	0.52
Malakal	0.49
Morobo	0.58
Pibor	0.56
Rubkona	0.70
Wau	0.56
Yei	0.48

Q1.5_County	Q11.10A_raw	answers	percentage
Yei	Not severe at all (no impact)	26	0.06
Yei	Not severe	94	0.23
Yei	Somewhat severe	184	0.45
Yei	Severe	102	0.25
Yei	Extremely severe	4	0.01
Wau	Not severe at all (no impact)	23	0.06
Wau	Not severe	33	0.08
Wau	Somewhat severe	185	0.46
Wau	Severe	132	0.33
Wau	Extremely severe	24	0.06
Wau	_2. Prefer not to answer	5	0.01
Rubkona	Not severe at all (no impact)	16	0.04
Rubkona	Not severe	37	0.09
Rubkona	Somewhat severe	96	0.24
Rubkona	Severe	113	0.28
Rubkona	Extremely severe	138	0.34
Pibor	Not severe at all (no impact)	41	0.10
Pibor	Not severe	51	0.13
Pibor	Somewhat severe	110	0.27
Pibor	Severe	176	0.43
Pibor	Extremely severe	28	0.07
Pibor	_2. Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Morobo	Not severe at all (no impact)	31	0.08
Morobo	Not severe	61	0.15
Morobo	Somewhat severe	106	0.26
Morobo	Severe	159	0.39
Morobo	Extremely severe	47	0.12
Malakal	Not severe at all (no impact)	9	0.02
Malakal	Not severe	78	0.19
Malakal	Somewhat severe	252	0.60
Malakal	Severe	79	0.19
Malakal	Extremely severe	3	0.01
Lainya	Not severe at all (no impact)	97	0.23
Lainya	Not severe	45	0.11
Lainya	Somewhat severe	63	0.15
Lainya	Severe	137	0.33
Lainya	Extremely severe	71	0.17
Lainya	_2. Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Kajo-keji	Not severe at all (no impact)	41	0.10
Kajo-keji	Not severe	50	0.13
Kajo-keji	Somewhat severe	121	0.30
Kajo-keji	Severe	103	0.26
Kajo-keji	Extremely severe	54	0.14
Kajo-keji	_2. Prefer not to answer	29	0.07
Bor South	Not severe at all (no impact)	31	0.07
Bor South	Not severe	51	0.12
Bor South	Somewhat severe	42	0.10
Bor South	Severe	99	0.23
Bor South	Extremely severe	199	0.46
Bor South	_2. Prefer not to answer	7	0.02

Q11.10B And how severe would you say the impact of any of these experiences have been on your household food consumption?

1. High Severity Perception: The majority of respondents perceive the impact on food consumption as “Severe” or “Somewhat severe,” indicating that food insecurity is a prominent concern among households.
2. Significant Extreme Impact: A notable proportion of households rate the impact as “Extremely severe,” suggesting that many families are facing critical challenges related to food availability and consumption due to environmental challenges.
3. Minimal Indifference: Very few respondents chose “Prefer not to answer,” implying that food consumption is a critical issue that most households are aware of and concerned about. 4.Above Average Impact: Rubkona (0.80) and Bor South (0.70) have mean responses well above the sample average (0.64), indicating that households in these counties perceive the impact on food consumption as particularly severe.
4. Counties with Lower Perceptions: Malakal (0.55) and Yei (0.56) report mean responses below the sample average, suggesting slightly lesser (but still notable) perceived impacts on food consumption in these areas.

Conclusion : The skew towards higher severity categories suggests that food-related environmental impact perceptions are not only prevalent but also pressing for most households in South Sudan. Also, the mean responses above 0.55 for most counties reflect a general high perception of environmental impacts on food consumption by county.

Entire sample

mean
0.64

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
Severe	1361	0.37
Somewhat severe	1232	0.33
Extremely severe	637	0.17
Not severe	312	0.08
Not severe at all (no impact)	110	0.03
_2. Prefer not to answer	33	0.01

By county

County	Mean Response (0 to 1)
Bor South	0.70
Kajo-keji	0.64
Lainya	0.59
Malakal	0.55
Morobo	0.67
Pibor	0.66
Rubkona	0.80
Wau	0.65
Yei	0.56

Q1.5_County	Q11.10B_raw	answers	percentage
Yei	Not severe at all (no impact)	6	0.01
Yei	Not severe	46	0.11
Yei	Somewhat severe	226	0.55
Yei	Severe	113	0.28
Yei	Extremely severe	19	0.05
Wau	Not severe at all (no impact)	3	0.01
Wau	Not severe	10	0.02
Wau	Somewhat severe	182	0.45
Wau	Severe	160	0.40
Wau	Extremely severe	44	0.11
Wau	_2. Prefer not to answer	3	0.01
Rubkona	Not severe at all (no impact)	3	0.01
Rubkona	Not severe	16	0.04
Rubkona	Somewhat severe	66	0.16
Rubkona	Severe	133	0.33
Rubkona	Extremely severe	182	0.46
Pibor	Not severe at all (no impact)	5	0.01
Pibor	Not severe	42	0.10
Pibor	Somewhat severe	123	0.30
Pibor	Severe	167	0.41
Pibor	Extremely severe	70	0.17
Morobo	Not severe at all (no impact)	13	0.03
Morobo	Not severe	28	0.07
Morobo	Somewhat severe	104	0.26
Morobo	Severe	190	0.47
Morobo	Extremely severe	69	0.17
Malakal	Not severe at all (no impact)	2	0.00
Malakal	Not severe	36	0.09
Malakal	Somewhat severe	261	0.62
Malakal	Severe	118	0.28
Malakal	Extremely severe	4	0.01
Lainya	Not severe at all (no impact)	58	0.14
Lainya	Not severe	51	0.12
Lainya	Somewhat severe	65	0.16
Lainya	Severe	168	0.41
Lainya	Extremely severe	71	0.17
Lainya	_2. Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Kajo-keji	Not severe at all (no impact)	14	0.04
Kajo-keji	Not severe	34	0.09
Kajo-keji	Somewhat severe	128	0.32
Kajo-keji	Severe	120	0.30
Kajo-keji	Extremely severe	76	0.19
Kajo-keji	_2. Prefer not to answer	26	0.07
Bor South	Not severe at all (no impact)	6	0.01
Bor South	Not severe	49	0.11
Bor South	Somewhat severe	77	0.18
Bor South	Severe	192	0.45
Bor South	Extremely severe	102	0.24
Bor South	_2. Prefer not to answer	3	0.01

Q11.10C And how severe would you say the impact of any of these experiences have been on your household’s ability to choose where you live?

1. High Perception of Impact: Most respondents consider the environmental impact on “where to live” as either “Severe” or “Somewhat severe,” indicating significant concerns about the impact on residential stability and choices.
2. Moderate to Extreme Impact Awareness: A large portion of households rate the impact as “Severe,” showing that a majority of respondents are highly concerned about factors affecting their residential decisions.
3. Lower Levels of Non-Severity: Relatively fewer households perceive the impact as “Not severe” or “Not severe at all,” indicating that environemtal impacts on residential issues are widely recognized as significant among respondents.
4. Above Average Impact: Rubkona (0.76) and Bor South (0.70) have mean responses significantly above the sample mean (0.59), suggesting that households in these counties face more severe challenges related to environmental impact on residential stability. Lainya (0.48) and Yei (0.49) show mean responses well below the sample mean, indicating that households in these areas perceive a comparatively lower environmental impact.

conclusion : The distribution is skewed toward higher severity categories, highlighting the fact that environmental impacts on “where to live” or living conditions are seen as pressing issues in the studied population. While the issue is widely recognized across different parts of the study area (most counties’ mean is above 0.50), there is a significant regional disparities in how households perceive the impact on living conditions (highest mean in Rubkona (0.76) and the lowest in Lainya (0.48))

Entire sample

mean
0.59

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
Severe	1239	0.34
Somewhat severe	1184	0.32
Not severe	507	0.14
Extremely severe	499	0.14
Not severe at all (no impact)	219	0.06
_2. Prefer not to answer	37	0.01

By county

County	Mean Response (0 to 1)
Bor South	0.70
Kajo-keji	0.58
Lainya	0.48
Malakal	0.58
Morobo	0.54
Pibor	0.57
Rubkona	0.76
Wau	0.60
Yei	0.49

Q1.5_County	Q11.10C_raw	answers	percentage
Yei	Not severe at all (no impact)	33	0.08
Yei	Not severe	68	0.17
Yei	Somewhat severe	200	0.49
Yei	Severe	100	0.24
Yei	Extremely severe	9	0.02
Wau	Not severe at all (no impact)	6	0.01
Wau	Not severe	22	0.05
Wau	Somewhat severe	207	0.51
Wau	Severe	131	0.33
Wau	Extremely severe	32	0.08
Wau	_2. Prefer not to answer	4	0.01
Rubkona	Not severe at all (no impact)	2	0.00
Rubkona	Not severe	24	0.06
Rubkona	Somewhat severe	80	0.20
Rubkona	Severe	139	0.35
Rubkona	Extremely severe	155	0.39
Pibor	Not severe at all (no impact)	20	0.05
Pibor	Not severe	67	0.16
Pibor	Somewhat severe	143	0.35
Pibor	Severe	136	0.33
Pibor	Extremely severe	39	0.10
Pibor	_2. Prefer not to answer	2	0.00
Morobo	Not severe at all (no impact)	38	0.09
Morobo	Not severe	95	0.24
Morobo	Somewhat severe	82	0.20
Morobo	Severe	144	0.36
Morobo	Extremely severe	45	0.11
Malakal	Not severe at all (no impact)	2	0.00
Malakal	Not severe	45	0.11
Malakal	Somewhat severe	205	0.49
Malakal	Severe	162	0.38
Malakal	Extremely severe	7	0.02
Lainya	Not severe at all (no impact)	84	0.20
Lainya	Not severe	90	0.22
Lainya	Somewhat severe	42	0.10
Lainya	Severe	164	0.40
Lainya	Extremely severe	33	0.08
Lainya	_2. Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Kajo-keji	Not severe at all (no impact)	27	0.07
Kajo-keji	Not severe	44	0.11
Kajo-keji	Somewhat severe	141	0.35
Kajo-keji	Severe	108	0.27
Kajo-keji	Extremely severe	51	0.13
Kajo-keji	_2. Prefer not to answer	27	0.07
Bor South	Not severe at all (no impact)	7	0.02
Bor South	Not severe	52	0.12
Bor South	Somewhat severe	84	0.20
Bor South	Severe	155	0.36
Bor South	Extremely severe	128	0.30
Bor South	_2. Prefer not to answer	3	0.01

Q11.10D And how severe would you say the impact of any of these experiences have been on your household’s health?

1. High Severity Perception: A significant portion of respondents rate the impact on household health as “Severe” or “Extremely severe,” highlighting serious concerns regarding health conditions for households.
2. Prominent Health Concerns: The largest number of respondents identify the impact as “Severe,” indicating that health-related issues are considered critical across many households. A relatively smaller group perceives the impact as “Somewhat severe,” “Not severe,” or “Not severe at all,” showing that while there is some variance, the overall perception is skewed toward higher severity levels.
3. Above Average Impact: Rubkona (0.81) and Bor South (0.72) have mean responses significantly above the sample mean of 0.64, indicating that households in these counties perceive the impact on health as more severe than in Lainya (0.57) and Malakal (0.53) with mean responses below the sample average (lower but still notable perception).
4. Regional Variability: There is a clear variability across counties, with the highest mean perception in Rubkona (0.81) and the lowest in Malakal (0.53), highlighting differences in health impact experiences across different geographic locations.

Conclusion : The distribution of responses is heavily weighted toward more severe categories indicate that health impacts are seen as urgent problems. Across the counties, the result show that most counties report mean responses above 0.57, reflecting that environmental impact perception on health is a widespread concern.

Entire sample

mean
0.64

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
Severe	1298	0.35
Somewhat severe	1259	0.34
Extremely severe	638	0.17
Not severe	352	0.10
Not severe at all (no impact)	103	0.03
_2. Prefer not to answer	35	0.01

By county

County	Mean Response (0 to 1)
Bor South	0.72
Kajo-keji	0.63
Lainya	0.57
Malakal	0.53
Morobo	0.68
Pibor	0.62
Rubkona	0.81
Wau	0.62
Yei	0.57

Q1.5_County	Q11.10D_raw	answers	percentage
Yei	Not severe at all (no impact)	6	0.01
Yei	Not severe	42	0.10
Yei	Somewhat severe	211	0.51
Yei	Severe	131	0.32
Yei	Extremely severe	20	0.05
Wau	Not severe at all (no impact)	4	0.01
Wau	Not severe	16	0.04
Wau	Somewhat severe	203	0.50
Wau	Severe	133	0.33
Wau	Extremely severe	41	0.10
Wau	_2. Prefer not to answer	5	0.01
Rubkona	Not severe at all (no impact)	2	0.00
Rubkona	Not severe	15	0.04
Rubkona	Somewhat severe	52	0.13
Rubkona	Severe	149	0.37
Rubkona	Extremely severe	182	0.46
Pibor	Not severe at all (no impact)	13	0.03
Pibor	Not severe	41	0.10
Pibor	Somewhat severe	141	0.35
Pibor	Severe	161	0.40
Pibor	Extremely severe	50	0.12
Pibor	_2. Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Morobo	Not severe at all (no impact)	12	0.03
Morobo	Not severe	37	0.09
Morobo	Somewhat severe	79	0.20
Morobo	Severe	207	0.51
Morobo	Extremely severe	69	0.17
Malakal	Not severe at all (no impact)	1	0.00
Malakal	Not severe	52	0.12
Malakal	Somewhat severe	273	0.65
Malakal	Severe	88	0.21
Malakal	Extremely severe	7	0.02
Lainya	Not severe at all (no impact)	52	0.13
Lainya	Not severe	63	0.15
Lainya	Somewhat severe	84	0.20
Lainya	Severe	150	0.36
Lainya	Extremely severe	64	0.15
Lainya	_2. Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Kajo-keji	Not severe at all (no impact)	10	0.03
Kajo-keji	Not severe	31	0.08
Kajo-keji	Somewhat severe	152	0.38
Kajo-keji	Severe	115	0.29
Kajo-keji	Extremely severe	67	0.17
Kajo-keji	_2. Prefer not to answer	23	0.06
Bor South	Not severe at all (no impact)	3	0.01
Bor South	Not severe	55	0.13
Bor South	Somewhat severe	64	0.15
Bor South	Severe	164	0.38
Bor South	Extremely severe	138	0.32
Bor South	_2. Prefer not to answer	5	0.01

Q11.11 Imagine that there was a flood coming to your town tomorrow. If you knew about this incoming flood before the water arrived, to what extent do you agree with the following statement: “I would be able to use this information to protect my household?”

1. High Agreement: Most respondents either “Agree” or “Strongly agree” with the idea of protecting another household ahead of a hurricane, indicating a strong willingness among households to support each other during crises. However, the level of commitment varies among households reflected in the response category.
2. Moderate Neutrality: A notable portion of respondents are “Neutral,” suggesting that a significant number of households are either unsure or may be constrained in their ability to protect others in this circumstance.
3. Low Levels of Disagreement: Very few respondents “Disagree” or “Strongly disagree” with the notion of mutual protection, indicating that the concept of supporting others during a hurricane is generally accepted among the community.
4. Near or Above Average Perception: Some counties, like Pibor (0.45) and Lainya (0.39), have mean responses above the entire sample mean of 0.32, indicating relatively stronger agreement levels and possibly greater perceived capability for household mutual support in these areas.Bor South (0.16) and Rubkona (0.24) have the lowest mean responses, suggesting lower ability to protect neighboring household in the region.

Conclusion : This result suggest that protection is both relevant and important to households in South Sudan. The mean response varies significantly, from a low of 0.16 in Bor South to a high of 0.45 in Pibor, reflecting differing levels of perceived ability or willingness to protect other households across counties. Despite regional differences, the overall lower scores suggest that households may feel limited in their ability to protect others, potentially due to their own vulnerability.

Entire sample

mean
0.32

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
Agree	1908	0.52
Strongly agree	720	0.20
Neither agree nor disagree	485	0.13
Disagree	359	0.10
Strongly disagree	185	0.05
_2. Prefer not to answer	28	0.01

By county

County	Mean Response (0 to 1)
Bor South	0.16
Kajo-keji	0.36
Lainya	0.39
Malakal	0.28
Morobo	0.38
Pibor	0.45
Rubkona	0.24
Wau	0.34
Yei	0.31

Q1.5_County	Q11.11_raw	answers	percentage
Yei	Strongly disagree	14	0.03
Yei	Disagree	24	0.06
Yei	Neither agree nor disagree	46	0.11
Yei	Agree	290	0.71
Yei	Strongly agree	36	0.09
Wau	Strongly disagree	18	0.04
Wau	Disagree	31	0.08
Wau	Neither agree nor disagree	99	0.25
Wau	Agree	179	0.45
Wau	Strongly agree	73	0.18
Wau	_2. Prefer not to answer	2	0.00
Rubkona	Strongly disagree	11	0.03
Rubkona	Disagree	38	0.10
Rubkona	Neither agree nor disagree	33	0.08
Rubkona	Agree	165	0.41
Rubkona	Strongly agree	153	0.38
Pibor	Strongly disagree	26	0.06
Pibor	Disagree	75	0.18
Pibor	Neither agree nor disagree	111	0.27
Pibor	Agree	175	0.43
Pibor	Strongly agree	19	0.05
Pibor	_2. Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Morobo	Strongly disagree	36	0.09
Morobo	Disagree	58	0.14
Morobo	Neither agree nor disagree	39	0.10
Morobo	Agree	212	0.52
Morobo	Strongly agree	58	0.14
Morobo	_2. Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Malakal	Strongly disagree	1	0.00
Malakal	Disagree	27	0.06
Malakal	Neither agree nor disagree	18	0.04
Malakal	Agree	346	0.82
Malakal	Strongly agree	29	0.07
Lainya	Strongly disagree	57	0.14
Lainya	Disagree	43	0.10
Lainya	Neither agree nor disagree	34	0.08
Lainya	Agree	214	0.52
Lainya	Strongly agree	63	0.15
Lainya	_2. Prefer not to answer	3	0.01
Kajo-keji	Strongly disagree	19	0.05
Kajo-keji	Disagree	60	0.15
Kajo-keji	Neither agree nor disagree	66	0.17
Kajo-keji	Agree	152	0.38
Kajo-keji	Strongly agree	81	0.20
Kajo-keji	_2. Prefer not to answer	20	0.05
Bor South	Strongly disagree	3	0.01
Bor South	Disagree	3	0.01
Bor South	Neither agree nor disagree	39	0.09
Bor South	Agree	175	0.41
Bor South	Strongly agree	208	0.48
Bor South	_2. Prefer not to answer	1	0.00

Additional Questions

Q11.7 On a scale from 1 through 5, where 1 is “strongly disagree” and 5 is “strongly agree,” how much do you agree with the following statements about your county’s experiences within the last 5 years?

All the answers are in a scale of 1-5, i.e. can have the following values: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5. The higher, the more agreement

Ex: 1 = Strongly disagree 2 = Disagree 3 = Neither agree nor disagree 4 = Agree 5 = Strongly agree 6 = Prefer not to respond

1. Strong Agreement on Rain Change: The majority of respondents either “Agree” or “Strongly agree” that there have been changes in seasonal rain patterns, indicating widespread awareness and recognition of climate shifts.Very few respondents “Disagree” or “Strongly disagree,” reflecting a general consensus among households about the changing nature of seasonal rainfall.
2. Neutrality Among Some Respondents: A moderate number of households chose “Neither agree nor disagree,” suggesting that some respondents are uncertain or have mixed experiences regarding changes in seasonal rain.
3. Above Average Perception in Bor South: Bor South has the highest mean response (4.3) beyond the sample mean of 3.8, indicating that households in this county strongly perceive changes in seasonal rain patterns. In contrast, Pibor has the lowest mean response (3.5), indicating that households in this county are relatively less convinced about changes in rainfall patterns, though they still lean toward agreement.
4. Moderate Perception in Multiple Counties: Lainya (3.7), Morobo (3.7), and Rubkona (3.7) all have similar mean responses, showing a consistent but moderate acknowledgment of changing seasonal rainfall.

Q11.7.1 In the last 5 years, the timing of the seasonal rains has changed

Entire sample

mean_response
3.8

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
Agree	2220	0.60
Strongly agree	656	0.18
Disagree	364	0.10
Neither agree nor disagree	312	0.08
Strongly disagree	118	0.03
Prefer not to respond	15	0.00

By county

County	Mean Response (1 to 5)
Bor South	4.3
Kajo-keji	3.9
Lainya	3.7
Malakal	3.6
Morobo	3.7
Pibor	3.5
Rubkona	3.7
Wau	3.8
Yei	3.9

Q1.5_County	Q11.7.1	answers	percentage
Yei	Agree	314	0.77
Yei	Disagree	25	0.06
Yei	Neither agree nor disagree	27	0.07
Yei	Strongly agree	43	0.10
Yei	Strongly disagree	1	0.00
Wau	Agree	273	0.68
Wau	Disagree	21	0.05
Wau	Neither agree nor disagree	65	0.16
Wau	Prefer not to respond	5	0.01
Wau	Strongly agree	34	0.08
Wau	Strongly disagree	4	0.01
Rubkona	Agree	193	0.48
Rubkona	Disagree	54	0.14
Rubkona	Neither agree nor disagree	21	0.05
Rubkona	Strongly agree	105	0.26
Rubkona	Strongly disagree	27	0.07
Pibor	Agree	227	0.56
Pibor	Disagree	59	0.14
Pibor	Neither agree nor disagree	69	0.17
Pibor	Strongly agree	31	0.08
Pibor	Strongly disagree	21	0.05
Morobo	Agree	218	0.54
Morobo	Disagree	36	0.09
Morobo	Neither agree nor disagree	30	0.07
Morobo	Strongly agree	89	0.22
Morobo	Strongly disagree	31	0.08
Malakal	Agree	320	0.76
Malakal	Disagree	86	0.20
Malakal	Neither agree nor disagree	8	0.02
Malakal	Prefer not to respond	1	0.00
Malakal	Strongly agree	6	0.01
Lainya	Agree	264	0.64
Lainya	Disagree	43	0.10
Lainya	Neither agree nor disagree	41	0.10
Lainya	Prefer not to respond	1	0.00
Lainya	Strongly agree	51	0.12
Lainya	Strongly disagree	14	0.03
Kajo-keji	Agree	191	0.48
Kajo-keji	Disagree	35	0.09
Kajo-keji	Neither agree nor disagree	26	0.07
Kajo-keji	Prefer not to respond	8	0.02
Kajo-keji	Strongly agree	120	0.30
Kajo-keji	Strongly disagree	18	0.05
Bor South	Agree	220	0.51
Bor South	Disagree	5	0.01
Bor South	Neither agree nor disagree	25	0.06
Bor South	Strongly agree	177	0.41
Bor South	Strongly disagree	2	0.00

Q11.7.2 In the last 5 years, water shortages in the dry season have become more frequent

1. High agreement on increased dry season frequency: The majority of respondents “Agree” that the dry season frequency has increased.There is also a substantial number of respondents who “Strongly agree” with that perception, indicating a strong perception of prolonged dry spells among households widespread awareness of this climatic shift.
2. Moderate disagreement: A notable portion of respondents “Disagree,” suggesting that some households may not have experienced an increase in dry season frequency or perceive it differently, potentially due to local variations in climate. 3.Regional perception : Bor South (3.8) and Wau (3.6) have mean responses above the sample mean of 3.5, indicating that households in these counties perceive more frequent dry seasons, Malakal (3.2) and Morobo (3.2) have the lowest mean responses, indicating that households in these counties perceive less change in dry season frequency or may be experiencing different climate dynamics.
3. Regional consistent perception: The similarity in mean responses for counties like Lainya (3.5), Kajo-keji (3.5), Pibor (3.5), and Rubkona (3.5) suggests a general consensus about increased dry season frequency, aligning closely with the sample mean.

Entire sample

mean_response
3.5

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
Agree	1945	0.53
Disagree	595	0.16
Neither agree nor disagree	502	0.14
Strongly agree	423	0.11
Strongly disagree	201	0.05
Prefer not to respond	19	0.01

By county

County	Mean Response (1 to 5)
Bor South	3.8
Kajo-keji	3.5
Lainya	3.4
Malakal	3.2
Morobo	3.2
Pibor	3.5
Rubkona	3.5
Wau	3.6
Yei	3.5

Q1.5_County	Q11.7.2	answers	percentage
Yei	Agree	269	0.66
Yei	Disagree	57	0.14
Yei	Neither agree nor disagree	69	0.17
Yei	Strongly agree	11	0.03
Yei	Strongly disagree	4	0.01
Wau	Agree	202	0.50
Wau	Disagree	39	0.10
Wau	Neither agree nor disagree	95	0.24
Wau	Prefer not to respond	12	0.03
Wau	Strongly agree	43	0.11
Wau	Strongly disagree	11	0.03
Rubkona	Agree	168	0.42
Rubkona	Disagree	74	0.18
Rubkona	Neither agree nor disagree	27	0.07
Rubkona	Strongly agree	93	0.23
Rubkona	Strongly disagree	38	0.10
Pibor	Agree	239	0.59
Pibor	Disagree	53	0.13
Pibor	Neither agree nor disagree	75	0.18
Pibor	Strongly agree	29	0.07
Pibor	Strongly disagree	11	0.03
Morobo	Agree	185	0.46
Morobo	Disagree	74	0.18
Morobo	Neither agree nor disagree	30	0.07
Morobo	Strongly agree	53	0.13
Morobo	Strongly disagree	62	0.15
Malakal	Agree	252	0.60
Malakal	Disagree	146	0.35
Malakal	Neither agree nor disagree	19	0.05
Malakal	Strongly agree	2	0.00
Malakal	Strongly disagree	2	0.00
Lainya	Agree	214	0.52
Lainya	Disagree	71	0.17
Lainya	Neither agree nor disagree	54	0.13
Lainya	Prefer not to respond	1	0.00
Lainya	Strongly agree	48	0.12
Lainya	Strongly disagree	26	0.06
Kajo-keji	Agree	199	0.50
Kajo-keji	Disagree	37	0.09
Kajo-keji	Neither agree nor disagree	57	0.14
Kajo-keji	Prefer not to respond	6	0.02
Kajo-keji	Strongly agree	61	0.15
Kajo-keji	Strongly disagree	38	0.10
Bor South	Agree	217	0.51
Bor South	Disagree	44	0.10
Bor South	Neither agree nor disagree	76	0.18
Bor South	Strongly agree	83	0.19
Bor South	Strongly disagree	9	0.02

Q11.7.3 In the last 5 years, the diversity of wildlife has diminished

1. High agreement on wildlife decline: The majority of respondents “Agree” that wildlife diversity has diminished. A considerable number of respondents also “Strongly agree”with the diminishing diversity, indicating a strong perception, awareness and concern among households of declining biodiversity over recent years.
2. Moderate disagreement and neutrality: There is a notable portion of respondents who “Disagree,” and others “Neither agree nor disagree,”. This may indicate that some households either have not observed significant changes or perceive the situation differently. Also, it may reflect uncertainty or mixed experiences regarding changes in wildlife diversity.
3. Regional Perception: Bor South has the highest mean response (3.6), suggesting that households in this county perceive the most significant decline in wildlife diversity. Malakal (3.3), Kajo-keji (3.4), Rubkona (3.5), and Wau (3.4) have mean responses near the sample mean of 3.3, indicating that the perception of wildlife decline is relatively consistent across these regions.
4. Lower Perception : Pibor (3.0) and Yei (3.0) have the lowest mean responses, suggesting that households in these counties are less convinced of a significant decline in wildlife diversity.

Entire sample

mean_response
3.3

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
Agree	1531	0.42
Disagree	880	0.24
Neither agree nor disagree	615	0.17
Strongly agree	383	0.10
Strongly disagree	195	0.05
Prefer not to respond	81	0.02

By county

County	Mean Response (1 to 5)
Bor South	3.6
Kajo-keji	3.4
Lainya	3.2
Malakal	3.3
Morobo	3.1
Pibor	3.0
Rubkona	3.5
Wau	3.4
Yei	3.0

Q1.5_County	Q11.7.3	answers	percentage
Yei	Agree	128	0.31
Yei	Disagree	155	0.38
Yei	Neither agree nor disagree	107	0.26
Yei	Strongly agree	18	0.04
Yei	Strongly disagree	2	0.00
Wau	Agree	153	0.38
Wau	Disagree	62	0.15
Wau	Neither agree nor disagree	93	0.23
Wau	Prefer not to respond	45	0.11
Wau	Strongly agree	40	0.10
Wau	Strongly disagree	9	0.02
Rubkona	Agree	170	0.42
Rubkona	Disagree	66	0.16
Rubkona	Neither agree nor disagree	33	0.08
Rubkona	Prefer not to respond	1	0.00
Rubkona	Strongly agree	92	0.23
Rubkona	Strongly disagree	38	0.10
Pibor	Agree	156	0.38
Pibor	Disagree	106	0.26
Pibor	Neither agree nor disagree	96	0.24
Pibor	Prefer not to respond	5	0.01
Pibor	Strongly agree	14	0.03
Pibor	Strongly disagree	30	0.07
Morobo	Agree	152	0.38
Morobo	Disagree	118	0.29
Morobo	Neither agree nor disagree	49	0.12
Morobo	Strongly agree	41	0.10
Morobo	Strongly disagree	44	0.11
Malakal	Agree	242	0.57
Malakal	Disagree	132	0.31
Malakal	Neither agree nor disagree	44	0.10
Malakal	Strongly agree	3	0.01
Lainya	Agree	161	0.39
Lainya	Disagree	101	0.24
Lainya	Neither agree nor disagree	93	0.22
Lainya	Prefer not to respond	5	0.01
Lainya	Strongly agree	34	0.08
Lainya	Strongly disagree	20	0.05
Kajo-keji	Agree	173	0.43
Kajo-keji	Disagree	71	0.18
Kajo-keji	Neither agree nor disagree	48	0.12
Kajo-keji	Prefer not to respond	13	0.03
Kajo-keji	Strongly agree	59	0.15
Kajo-keji	Strongly disagree	34	0.09
Bor South	Agree	196	0.46
Bor South	Disagree	69	0.16
Bor South	Neither agree nor disagree	52	0.12
Bor South	Prefer not to respond	12	0.03
Bor South	Strongly agree	82	0.19
Bor South	Strongly disagree	18	0.04

Q11.7.4 In the last 5 years, there has been an increase in urbanization, for example the construction of new buildings

1. High agreement on urbanization increase: The majority of respondents “Agree” that there has been an increase in urbanization over the last five years, indicating a strong perception of expanding urban areas among households. others “Strongly agree,” further emphasizing the perception that urbanization is rapidly progressing. However,a fair number of respondents chose “Neither agree nor disagree,” indicating uncertainty or mixed experiences related to changes in urbanization
2. Considerable Disagreement: There is a substantial number of households that “Disagree” with the perception of increased urbanization, suggesting that some regions or communities may not have experienced significant urban growth.
3. Regional perception : Bor South (3.9), Rubkona (3.6), and Wau (3.6) have mean responses above the sample mean of 3.3, indicating that households in these counties perceive a stronger increase in urbanization compared to Morobo (2.7) and Yei (2.8) which have the lowest mean responses.
4. Regional moderate perception: Kajo-keji (3.2) and Lainya (3.2) have mean responses slightly below the sample mean, indicating moderate perceptions of urbanization that may vary across different parts of these counties.

Entire sample

mean_response
3.3

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
Agree	1557	0.42
Disagree	840	0.23
Neither agree nor disagree	446	0.12
Strongly agree	441	0.12
Strongly disagree	371	0.10
Prefer not to respond	30	0.01

By county

County	Mean Response (1 to 5)
Bor South	3.9
Kajo-keji	3.2
Lainya	3.2
Malakal	3.3
Morobo	2.7
Pibor	2.9
Rubkona	3.6
Wau	3.6
Yei	2.8

Q1.5_County	Q11.7.4	answers	percentage
Yei	Agree	132	0.32
Yei	Disagree	143	0.35
Yei	Neither agree nor disagree	53	0.13
Yei	Strongly agree	19	0.05
Yei	Strongly disagree	63	0.15
Wau	Agree	161	0.40
Wau	Disagree	49	0.12
Wau	Neither agree nor disagree	85	0.21
Wau	Prefer not to respond	9	0.02
Wau	Strongly agree	76	0.19
Wau	Strongly disagree	22	0.05
Rubkona	Agree	164	0.41
Rubkona	Disagree	70	0.17
Rubkona	Neither agree nor disagree	48	0.12
Rubkona	Strongly agree	93	0.23
Rubkona	Strongly disagree	25	0.06
Pibor	Agree	131	0.32
Pibor	Disagree	131	0.32
Pibor	Neither agree nor disagree	92	0.23
Pibor	Prefer not to respond	3	0.01
Pibor	Strongly agree	12	0.03
Pibor	Strongly disagree	38	0.09
Morobo	Agree	119	0.29
Morobo	Disagree	136	0.34
Morobo	Neither agree nor disagree	29	0.07
Morobo	Strongly agree	38	0.09
Morobo	Strongly disagree	82	0.20
Malakal	Agree	257	0.61
Malakal	Disagree	134	0.32
Malakal	Neither agree nor disagree	17	0.04
Malakal	Strongly agree	7	0.02
Malakal	Strongly disagree	6	0.01
Lainya	Agree	223	0.54
Lainya	Disagree	71	0.17
Lainya	Neither agree nor disagree	37	0.09
Lainya	Prefer not to respond	3	0.01
Lainya	Strongly agree	24	0.06
Lainya	Strongly disagree	56	0.14
Kajo-keji	Agree	174	0.44
Kajo-keji	Disagree	68	0.17
Kajo-keji	Neither agree nor disagree	34	0.09
Kajo-keji	Prefer not to respond	9	0.02
Kajo-keji	Strongly agree	51	0.13
Kajo-keji	Strongly disagree	62	0.16
Bor South	Agree	196	0.46
Bor South	Disagree	38	0.09
Bor South	Neither agree nor disagree	51	0.12
Bor South	Prefer not to respond	6	0.01
Bor South	Strongly agree	121	0.28
Bor South	Strongly disagree	17	0.04

Q11.7.5 In the last 5 years, the land has become less fertile, such as from soil erosion

1. High agreement on land fertility decline: The majority of respondents “Agree” that land fertility has declined, indicating a widespread perception of deteriorating soil productivity among households.Others “Strongly agree,” reinforcing the perception that land fertility is diminishing.
2. Considerable disagreement: A notable portion of respondents “Disagree,” indicating that some households do not perceive a significant decline in land fertility, which may reflect regional differences in soil quality or land management practices.
3. Regional perception: Bor South (3.6) and Rubkona (3.6) have mean responses above the sample mean of 3.3, indicating that households in these counties perceive a stronger decline in land fertility. In contrast, Pibor (2.9) and Yei (2.9) have the lowest mean responses, suggesting that households in these counties are less convinced of a significant decline in land fertility.
4. Regional matching perception: Kajo-keji (3.3) and Malakal (3.3) have mean responses that align with the sample mean, suggesting consistent matching perceptions of declining land fertility.

Entire sample

mean_response
3.3

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
Agree	1588	0.43
Disagree	871	0.24
Neither agree nor disagree	444	0.12
Strongly agree	379	0.10
Strongly disagree	322	0.09
Prefer not to respond	59	0.02
NA	22	0.01

By county

County	Mean Response (1 to 5)
Bor South	3.6
Kajo-keji	3.3
Lainya	3.0
Malakal	3.3
Morobo	3.0
Pibor	2.9
Rubkona	3.6
Wau	3.5
Yei	2.9

Q1.5_County	Q11.7.5	answers	percentage
Yei	Agree	143	0.35
Yei	Disagree	162	0.40
Yei	Neither agree nor disagree	70	0.17
Yei	Prefer not to respond	1	0.00
Yei	Strongly agree	6	0.01
Yei	Strongly disagree	26	0.06
Yei	NA	2	0.00
Wau	Agree	176	0.44
Wau	Disagree	44	0.11
Wau	Neither agree nor disagree	89	0.22
Wau	Prefer not to respond	34	0.08
Wau	Strongly agree	39	0.10
Wau	Strongly disagree	18	0.04
Wau	NA	2	0.00
Rubkona	Agree	181	0.45
Rubkona	Disagree	60	0.15
Rubkona	Neither agree nor disagree	32	0.08
Rubkona	Prefer not to respond	1	0.00
Rubkona	Strongly agree	89	0.22
Rubkona	Strongly disagree	36	0.09
Rubkona	NA	1	0.00
Pibor	Agree	135	0.33
Pibor	Disagree	142	0.35
Pibor	Neither agree nor disagree	77	0.19
Pibor	Prefer not to respond	2	0.00
Pibor	Strongly agree	20	0.05
Pibor	Strongly disagree	28	0.07
Pibor	NA	3	0.01
Morobo	Agree	146	0.36
Morobo	Disagree	122	0.30
Morobo	Neither agree nor disagree	22	0.05
Morobo	Strongly agree	51	0.13
Morobo	Strongly disagree	61	0.15
Morobo	NA	2	0.00
Malakal	Agree	265	0.63
Malakal	Disagree	133	0.32
Malakal	Neither agree nor disagree	18	0.04
Malakal	Strongly agree	1	0.00
Malakal	NA	4	0.01
Lainya	Agree	186	0.45
Lainya	Disagree	96	0.23
Lainya	Neither agree nor disagree	37	0.09
Lainya	Prefer not to respond	1	0.00
Lainya	Strongly agree	20	0.05
Lainya	Strongly disagree	72	0.17
Lainya	NA	2	0.00
Kajo-keji	Agree	149	0.37
Kajo-keji	Disagree	62	0.16
Kajo-keji	Neither agree nor disagree	40	0.10
Kajo-keji	Prefer not to respond	13	0.03
Kajo-keji	Strongly agree	72	0.18
Kajo-keji	Strongly disagree	57	0.14
Kajo-keji	NA	5	0.01
Bor South	Agree	207	0.48
Bor South	Disagree	50	0.12
Bor South	Neither agree nor disagree	59	0.14
Bor South	Prefer not to respond	7	0.02
Bor South	Strongly agree	81	0.19
Bor South	Strongly disagree	24	0.06
Bor South	NA	1	0.00

Q11.7.6 In the last 5 years, deforestation has occurred, meaning that there has been cutting or other reductions in the size of forests

1. High agreement on deforestation: The majority of respondents “Agree” that deforestation has increased in the last five years, indicating widespread recognition of this environmental issue among households.A large number of respondents also “Strongly agree” with the perception of increased deforestation, suggesting awareness and concern about deforestation among communities.However,
2. Notable disagreement: Some respondents “Disagree,” indicating that not all households have experienced or observed significant deforestation.
3. Moderate Neutral Responses: A significant number of households selected “Neither agree nor disagree,” reflecting uncertainty or mixed experiences regarding deforestation trends over the last five years.
4. Regional high perception : Bor South (4.1) and Kajo-keji (3.9) have mean responses above the sample mean of 3.5, indicating stronger perceptions of increased deforestation. In contrast, Morobo (3.2), Pibor (3.0), and Yei (3.0) have the lowest mean responses, indicating that households in these counties perceive less severe deforestation or are less aware of its impacts.

Entire sample

mean_response
3.5

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
Agree	1823	0.49
Disagree	684	0.19
Strongly agree	534	0.14
Neither agree nor disagree	399	0.11
Strongly disagree	201	0.05
Prefer not to respond	44	0.01

By county

County	Mean Response (1 to 5)
Bor South	4.1
Kajo-keji	3.9
Lainya	3.5
Malakal	3.6
Morobo	3.2
Pibor	3.0
Rubkona	3.7
Wau	3.4
Yei	3.0

Q1.5_County	Q11.7.6	answers	percentage
Yei	Agree	160	0.39
Yei	Disagree	130	0.32
Yei	Neither agree nor disagree	88	0.21
Yei	Strongly agree	9	0.02
Yei	Strongly disagree	23	0.06
Wau	Agree	201	0.50
Wau	Disagree	56	0.14
Wau	Neither agree nor disagree	80	0.20
Wau	Prefer not to respond	27	0.07
Wau	Strongly agree	22	0.05
Wau	Strongly disagree	16	0.04
Rubkona	Agree	187	0.47
Rubkona	Disagree	61	0.15
Rubkona	Neither agree nor disagree	18	0.04
Rubkona	Prefer not to respond	1	0.00
Rubkona	Strongly agree	101	0.25
Rubkona	Strongly disagree	32	0.08
Pibor	Agree	150	0.37
Pibor	Disagree	122	0.30
Pibor	Neither agree nor disagree	79	0.19
Pibor	Prefer not to respond	1	0.00
Pibor	Strongly agree	23	0.06
Pibor	Strongly disagree	32	0.08
Morobo	Agree	151	0.37
Morobo	Disagree	104	0.26
Morobo	Neither agree nor disagree	30	0.07
Morobo	Strongly agree	72	0.18
Morobo	Strongly disagree	47	0.12
Malakal	Agree	313	0.74
Malakal	Disagree	78	0.19
Malakal	Neither agree nor disagree	24	0.06
Malakal	Prefer not to respond	1	0.00
Malakal	Strongly agree	5	0.01
Lainya	Agree	240	0.58
Lainya	Disagree	72	0.17
Lainya	Neither agree nor disagree	31	0.07
Lainya	Strongly agree	41	0.10
Lainya	Strongly disagree	30	0.07
Kajo-keji	Agree	210	0.53
Kajo-keji	Disagree	38	0.10
Kajo-keji	Neither agree nor disagree	22	0.06
Kajo-keji	Prefer not to respond	11	0.03
Kajo-keji	Strongly agree	106	0.27
Kajo-keji	Strongly disagree	11	0.03
Bor South	Agree	211	0.49
Bor South	Disagree	23	0.05
Bor South	Neither agree nor disagree	27	0.06
Bor South	Prefer not to respond	3	0.01
Bor South	Strongly agree	155	0.36
Bor South	Strongly disagree	10	0.02

Q11.7.7 In the last 5 years, excessive grazing has caused damage to grassland.

1. High agreement on grazing impact: The majority of respondents “Agree” that grazing has negatively impacted grasslands over the last five years. Also, a substantial number of respondents also “Strongly agree,” suggesting a strong perception of environmental changes related to grazing practices, and awareness or concern among households about the impact of grazing on grassland health.
2. Considerable disagreement and neutrality: Some respondents “Disagree,” and a fair number of respondents selected “Neither agree nor disagree,” suggesting that not all households perceive grazing as a major threat to grassland, or uncertainty or mixed perceptions regarding the impact of grazing.
3. Regional perception: Rubkona has the highest mean response (3.6) compared to the overall sample mean of 3.4, indicating that households in this county perceive a stronger impact of grazing on grassland and Morobo (2.8) has the lowest mean response, indicating that households in this county perceive less impact of grazing on grassland.
4. Regional matching perception: Bor South (3.5), Kajo-keji (3.5), Lainya (3.5), and Wau (3.5) have mean responses close to the sample mean, suggesting consistent perceptions of grazing impact across these regions.

Entire sample

mean_response
3.4

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
Agree	1587	0.43
Disagree	869	0.24
Neither agree nor disagree	472	0.13
Strongly agree	448	0.12
Strongly disagree	244	0.07
Prefer not to respond	65	0.02

By county

County	Mean Response (1 to 5)
Bor South	3.5
Kajo-keji	3.5
Lainya	3.5
Malakal	3.4
Morobo	2.8
Pibor	3.0
Rubkona	3.6
Wau	3.5
Yei	3.0

Q1.5_County	Q11.7.7	answers	percentage
Yei	Agree	143	0.35
Yei	Disagree	135	0.33
Yei	Neither agree nor disagree	101	0.25
Yei	Prefer not to respond	2	0.00
Yei	Strongly agree	9	0.02
Yei	Strongly disagree	20	0.05
Wau	Agree	147	0.37
Wau	Disagree	52	0.13
Wau	Neither agree nor disagree	99	0.25
Wau	Prefer not to respond	43	0.11
Wau	Strongly agree	51	0.13
Wau	Strongly disagree	10	0.02
Rubkona	Agree	189	0.47
Rubkona	Disagree	53	0.13
Rubkona	Neither agree nor disagree	18	0.04
Rubkona	Strongly agree	101	0.25
Rubkona	Strongly disagree	39	0.10
Pibor	Agree	137	0.34
Pibor	Disagree	140	0.34
Pibor	Neither agree nor disagree	80	0.20
Pibor	Prefer not to respond	3	0.01
Pibor	Strongly agree	26	0.06
Pibor	Strongly disagree	21	0.05
Morobo	Agree	109	0.27
Morobo	Disagree	148	0.37
Morobo	Neither agree nor disagree	20	0.05
Morobo	Strongly agree	55	0.14
Morobo	Strongly disagree	72	0.18
Malakal	Agree	268	0.64
Malakal	Disagree	116	0.28
Malakal	Neither agree nor disagree	31	0.07
Malakal	Strongly agree	6	0.01
Lainya	Agree	237	0.57
Lainya	Disagree	88	0.21
Lainya	Neither agree nor disagree	34	0.08
Lainya	Prefer not to respond	3	0.01
Lainya	Strongly agree	42	0.10
Lainya	Strongly disagree	10	0.02
Kajo-keji	Agree	186	0.47
Kajo-keji	Disagree	42	0.11
Kajo-keji	Neither agree nor disagree	45	0.11
Kajo-keji	Prefer not to respond	10	0.03
Kajo-keji	Strongly agree	66	0.17
Kajo-keji	Strongly disagree	49	0.12
Bor South	Agree	171	0.40
Bor South	Disagree	95	0.22
Bor South	Neither agree nor disagree	44	0.10
Bor South	Prefer not to respond	4	0.01
Bor South	Strongly agree	92	0.21
Bor South	Strongly disagree	23	0.05

Q11.7.8 In the last 5 years, the amount of waste left in the streets has increased.

1. High agreement on Waste Increase: The majority of respondents “Agree” that waste has increased over the last five years, indicating a strong perception of rising waste generation among households.A considerable number of respondents “Strongly agree,” reflecting awareness and concern about waste management and its impacts.
2. Neutral and minimum indifference perceptions: While very few respondents selected “Prefer not to respond,”, a fair number of respondents chose “Neither agree nor disagree,” indicating that some households are uncertain or have mixed experiences regarding changes in waste generation. That small indifference can infer also that the issue of waste increase is relevant and prompts clear opinions among most households.
3. Regional perception : Bor South (3.6) and Kajo-keji (3.5) have mean responses above the sample mean of 3.2, indicating that households in these counties perceive a stronger increase in waste compared to Morobo (2.5) and Yei (2.8) which have the lowest mean responses, indicating that households in these counties perceive less of an increase in waste.
4. Regional matching and moderate perceptions: Malakal (3.4), Rubkona (3.5), and Wau (3.3) have mean responses that are close to or slightly above the sample mean, suggesting consistent perceptions of increased waste generation across these areas.in contrast, Pibor (3.0) and Lainya (3.0) have mean responses at the sample mean level, indicating mixed perceptions about waste increase.

Entire sample

mean_response
3.2

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
Agree	1546	0.42
Disagree	984	0.27
Neither agree nor disagree	389	0.11
Strongly agree	357	0.10
Strongly disagree	350	0.09
Prefer not to respond	59	0.02

By county

County	Mean Response (1 to 5)
Bor South	3.6
Kajo-keji	3.4
Lainya	3.0
Malakal	3.4
Morobo	2.4
Pibor	3.0
Rubkona	3.5
Wau	3.3
Yei	2.8

Q1.5_County	Q11.7.8	answers	percentage
Yei	Agree	116	0.28
Yei	Disagree	195	0.48
Yei	Neither agree nor disagree	70	0.17
Yei	Prefer not to respond	1	0.00
Yei	Strongly agree	10	0.02
Yei	Strongly disagree	18	0.04
Wau	Agree	167	0.42
Wau	Disagree	84	0.21
Wau	Neither agree nor disagree	73	0.18
Wau	Prefer not to respond	31	0.08
Wau	Strongly agree	31	0.08
Wau	Strongly disagree	16	0.04
Rubkona	Agree	167	0.42
Rubkona	Disagree	66	0.16
Rubkona	Neither agree nor disagree	29	0.07
Rubkona	Prefer not to respond	8	0.02
Rubkona	Strongly agree	90	0.22
Rubkona	Strongly disagree	40	0.10
Pibor	Agree	141	0.35
Pibor	Disagree	139	0.34
Pibor	Neither agree nor disagree	57	0.14
Pibor	Prefer not to respond	2	0.00
Pibor	Strongly agree	34	0.08
Pibor	Strongly disagree	34	0.08
Morobo	Agree	80	0.20
Morobo	Disagree	206	0.51
Morobo	Neither agree nor disagree	20	0.05
Morobo	Strongly agree	25	0.06
Morobo	Strongly disagree	73	0.18
Malakal	Agree	288	0.68
Malakal	Disagree	114	0.27
Malakal	Neither agree nor disagree	11	0.03
Malakal	Strongly agree	5	0.01
Malakal	Strongly disagree	3	0.01
Lainya	Agree	176	0.43
Lainya	Disagree	88	0.21
Lainya	Neither agree nor disagree	51	0.12
Lainya	Prefer not to respond	1	0.00
Lainya	Strongly agree	22	0.05
Lainya	Strongly disagree	76	0.18
Kajo-keji	Agree	184	0.46
Kajo-keji	Disagree	50	0.13
Kajo-keji	Neither agree nor disagree	40	0.10
Kajo-keji	Prefer not to respond	13	0.03
Kajo-keji	Strongly agree	65	0.16
Kajo-keji	Strongly disagree	46	0.12
Bor South	Agree	227	0.53
Bor South	Disagree	42	0.10
Bor South	Neither agree nor disagree	38	0.09
Bor South	Prefer not to respond	3	0.01
Bor South	Strongly agree	75	0.17
Bor South	Strongly disagree	44	0.10

Q11.8 Over the next 5 years in South Sudan, do you think changes in climate or weather patterns will cause less/fewer of the following crises, more of the following crises, or will have no impact on the following crises?

All the answers are in a scale of 1-3, i.e. can have the following values: 1, 2, 3.

Ex: 1 = Less impact 2 = More impact 3 = No impact

Q11.8.1 Droughts and water shortages

Entire sample

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
Less	1625	0.44
More	1506	0.41
No impact	476	0.13
Prefer not to answer	78	0.02

By county

County	Mean Response (1 to 4)
Bor South	1.4
Kajo-keji	1.5
Lainya	1.8
Malakal	1.6
Morobo	1.8
Pibor	1.8
Rubkona	1.7
Wau	1.8
Yei	1.6

Q1.5_County	Q11.8.1	answers	percentage
Yei	Less	225	0.55
Yei	More	112	0.27
Yei	No impact	73	0.18
Wau	Less	143	0.36
Wau	More	171	0.43
Wau	No impact	55	0.14
Wau	Prefer not to answer	33	0.08
Rubkona	Less	151	0.38
Rubkona	More	195	0.49
Rubkona	No impact	49	0.12
Rubkona	Prefer not to answer	5	0.01
Pibor	Less	93	0.23
Pibor	More	279	0.69
Pibor	No impact	32	0.08
Pibor	Prefer not to answer	3	0.01
Morobo	Less	128	0.32
Morobo	More	239	0.59
Morobo	No impact	37	0.09
Malakal	Less	234	0.56
Malakal	More	99	0.24
Malakal	No impact	88	0.21
Lainya	Less	152	0.37
Lainya	More	173	0.42
Lainya	No impact	83	0.20
Lainya	Prefer not to answer	6	0.01
Kajo-keji	Less	234	0.59
Kajo-keji	More	115	0.29
Kajo-keji	No impact	37	0.09
Kajo-keji	Prefer not to answer	12	0.03
Bor South	Less	265	0.62
Bor South	More	123	0.29
Bor South	No impact	22	0.05
Bor South	Prefer not to answer	19	0.04

Q11.8.2 Floods

Entire sample

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
More	1554	0.42
Less	1287	0.35
No impact	749	0.20
Prefer not to answer	95	0.03

By county

County	Mean Response (1 to 4)
Bor South	1.9
Kajo-keji	1.5
Lainya	2.0
Malakal	1.6
Morobo	1.8
Pibor	1.8
Rubkona	1.8
Wau	1.9
Yei	2.4

Q1.5_County	Q11.8.2	answers	percentage
Yei	Less	122	0.30
Yei	More	23	0.06
Yei	No impact	264	0.64
Yei	Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Wau	Less	132	0.33
Wau	More	117	0.29
Wau	No impact	105	0.26
Wau	Prefer not to answer	48	0.12
Rubkona	Less	82	0.20
Rubkona	More	291	0.73
Rubkona	No impact	23	0.06
Rubkona	Prefer not to answer	4	0.01
Pibor	Less	109	0.27
Pibor	More	259	0.64
Pibor	No impact	35	0.09
Pibor	Prefer not to answer	4	0.01
Morobo	Less	190	0.47
Morobo	More	113	0.28
Morobo	No impact	101	0.25
Malakal	Less	189	0.45
Malakal	More	227	0.54
Malakal	No impact	4	0.01
Malakal	Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Lainya	Less	165	0.40
Lainya	More	93	0.22
Lainya	No impact	149	0.36
Lainya	Prefer not to answer	7	0.02
Kajo-keji	Less	244	0.61
Kajo-keji	More	76	0.19
Kajo-keji	No impact	64	0.16
Kajo-keji	Prefer not to answer	14	0.04
Bor South	Less	54	0.13
Bor South	More	355	0.83
Bor South	No impact	4	0.01
Bor South	Prefer not to answer	16	0.04

Q11.8.3 Changes in precipitation patterns

Entire sample

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
Less	1643	0.45
More	1409	0.38
No impact	527	0.14
Prefer not to answer	106	0.03

By county

County	Mean Response (1 to 4)
Bor South	1.6
Kajo-keji	1.5
Lainya	1.8
Malakal	1.7
Morobo	1.6
Pibor	1.8
Rubkona	1.7
Wau	1.8
Yei	1.7

Q1.5_County	Q11.8.3	answers	percentage
Yei	Less	229	0.56
Yei	More	67	0.16
Yei	No impact	114	0.28
Wau	Less	133	0.33
Wau	More	152	0.38
Wau	No impact	52	0.13
Wau	Prefer not to answer	65	0.16
Rubkona	Less	139	0.35
Rubkona	More	232	0.58
Rubkona	No impact	24	0.06
Rubkona	Prefer not to answer	5	0.01
Pibor	Less	130	0.32
Pibor	More	231	0.57
Pibor	No impact	41	0.10
Pibor	Prefer not to answer	5	0.01
Morobo	Less	192	0.48
Morobo	More	184	0.46
Morobo	No impact	28	0.07
Malakal	Less	234	0.56
Malakal	More	72	0.17
Malakal	No impact	115	0.27
Lainya	Less	175	0.42
Lainya	More	146	0.35
Lainya	No impact	87	0.21
Lainya	Prefer not to answer	6	0.01
Kajo-keji	Less	234	0.59
Kajo-keji	More	99	0.25
Kajo-keji	No impact	52	0.13
Kajo-keji	Prefer not to answer	13	0.03
Bor South	Less	177	0.41
Bor South	More	226	0.53
Bor South	No impact	14	0.03
Bor South	Prefer not to answer	12	0.03

Q11.8.4 Wildfires

Entire sample

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
Less	1502	0.41
More	1124	0.31
No impact	920	0.25
Prefer not to answer	139	0.04

By county

County	Mean Response (1 to 4)
Bor South	1.9
Kajo-keji	1.6
Lainya	1.9
Malakal	1.7
Morobo	1.8
Pibor	1.7
Rubkona	1.9
Wau	1.8
Yei	2.2

Q1.5_County	Q11.8.4	answers	percentage
Yei	Less	133	0.32
Yei	More	70	0.17
Yei	No impact	206	0.50
Yei	Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Wau	Less	142	0.35
Wau	More	90	0.22
Wau	No impact	85	0.21
Wau	Prefer not to answer	85	0.21
Rubkona	Less	105	0.26
Rubkona	More	225	0.56
Rubkona	No impact	63	0.16
Rubkona	Prefer not to answer	7	0.02
Pibor	Less	189	0.46
Pibor	More	152	0.37
Pibor	No impact	62	0.15
Pibor	Prefer not to answer	4	0.01
Morobo	Less	164	0.41
Morobo	More	152	0.38
Morobo	No impact	88	0.22
Malakal	Less	225	0.53
Malakal	More	78	0.19
Malakal	No impact	117	0.28
Malakal	Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Lainya	Less	160	0.39
Lainya	More	132	0.32
Lainya	No impact	114	0.28
Lainya	Prefer not to answer	8	0.02
Kajo-keji	Less	213	0.54
Kajo-keji	More	113	0.28
Kajo-keji	No impact	58	0.15
Kajo-keji	Prefer not to answer	14	0.04
Bor South	Less	171	0.40
Bor South	More	112	0.26
Bor South	No impact	127	0.30
Bor South	Prefer not to answer	19	0.04

Q11.8.5 Changes in temperature

Entire sample

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
More	1844	0.50
Less	1352	0.37
No impact	413	0.11
Prefer not to answer	76	0.02

By county

County	Mean Response (1 to 4)
Bor South	1.6
Kajo-keji	1.6
Lainya	1.8
Malakal	1.8
Morobo	1.6
Pibor	1.7
Rubkona	1.9
Wau	1.9
Yei	1.7

Q1.5_County	Q11.8.5	answers	percentage
Yei	Less	169	0.41
Yei	More	186	0.45
Yei	No impact	54	0.13
Yei	Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Wau	Less	69	0.17
Wau	More	273	0.68
Wau	No impact	34	0.08
Wau	Prefer not to answer	26	0.06
Rubkona	Less	68	0.17
Rubkona	More	296	0.74
Rubkona	No impact	27	0.07
Rubkona	Prefer not to answer	9	0.02
Pibor	Less	150	0.37
Pibor	More	217	0.53
Pibor	No impact	37	0.09
Pibor	Prefer not to answer	3	0.01
Morobo	Less	177	0.44
Morobo	More	203	0.50
Morobo	No impact	24	0.06
Malakal	Less	195	0.46
Malakal	More	111	0.26
Malakal	No impact	115	0.27
Lainya	Less	162	0.39
Lainya	More	182	0.44
Lainya	No impact	62	0.15
Lainya	Prefer not to answer	8	0.02
Kajo-keji	Less	197	0.49
Kajo-keji	More	136	0.34
Kajo-keji	No impact	50	0.13
Kajo-keji	Prefer not to answer	15	0.04
Bor South	Less	165	0.38
Bor South	More	240	0.56
Bor South	No impact	10	0.02
Bor South	Prefer not to answer	14	0.03

Q11.8.6 Famines and food shortages

Entire sample

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
More	2138	0.58
Less	1108	0.30
No impact	369	0.10
Prefer not to answer	70	0.02

By county

County	Mean Response (1 to 4)
Bor South	1.8
Kajo-keji	1.7
Lainya	2.0
Malakal	1.8
Morobo	1.8
Pibor	1.8
Rubkona	1.8
Wau	1.9
Yei	1.6

Q1.5_County	Q11.8.6	answers	percentage
Yei	Less	200	0.49
Yei	More	157	0.38
Yei	No impact	53	0.13
Wau	Less	90	0.22
Wau	More	241	0.60
Wau	No impact	45	0.11
Wau	Prefer not to answer	26	0.06
Rubkona	Less	96	0.24
Rubkona	More	272	0.68
Rubkona	No impact	26	0.06
Rubkona	Prefer not to answer	6	0.01
Pibor	Less	125	0.31
Pibor	More	244	0.60
Pibor	No impact	36	0.09
Pibor	Prefer not to answer	2	0.00
Morobo	Less	94	0.23
Morobo	More	289	0.72
Morobo	No impact	21	0.05
Malakal	Less	168	0.40
Malakal	More	187	0.44
Malakal	No impact	66	0.16
Lainya	Less	75	0.18
Lainya	More	260	0.63
Lainya	No impact	75	0.18
Lainya	Prefer not to answer	4	0.01
Kajo-keji	Less	167	0.42
Kajo-keji	More	171	0.43
Kajo-keji	No impact	43	0.11
Kajo-keji	Prefer not to answer	17	0.04
Bor South	Less	93	0.22
Bor South	More	317	0.74
Bor South	No impact	4	0.01
Bor South	Prefer not to answer	15	0.03

Q11.8.7 Refugees

Entire sample

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
Less	1422	0.39
More	1309	0.36
No impact	846	0.23
Prefer not to answer	108	0.03

By county

County	Mean Response (1 to 4)
Bor South	2.0
Kajo-keji	1.7
Lainya	2.0
Malakal	1.6
Morobo	1.9
Pibor	1.8
Rubkona	1.7
Wau	1.9
Yei	1.9

Q1.5_County	Q11.8.7	answers	percentage
Yei	Less	194	0.47
Yei	More	40	0.10
Yei	No impact	173	0.42
Yei	Prefer not to answer	3	0.01
Wau	Less	134	0.33
Wau	More	109	0.27
Wau	No impact	112	0.28
Wau	Prefer not to answer	47	0.12
Rubkona	Less	136	0.34
Rubkona	More	240	0.60
Rubkona	No impact	21	0.05
Rubkona	Prefer not to answer	3	0.01
Pibor	Less	192	0.47
Pibor	More	118	0.29
Pibor	No impact	94	0.23
Pibor	Prefer not to answer	3	0.01
Morobo	Less	130	0.32
Morobo	More	187	0.46
Morobo	No impact	86	0.21
Morobo	Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Malakal	Less	248	0.59
Malakal	More	76	0.18
Malakal	No impact	97	0.23
Lainya	Less	102	0.25
Lainya	More	212	0.51
Lainya	No impact	90	0.22
Lainya	Prefer not to answer	10	0.02
Kajo-keji	Less	184	0.46
Kajo-keji	More	120	0.30
Kajo-keji	No impact	72	0.18
Kajo-keji	Prefer not to answer	22	0.06
Bor South	Less	102	0.24
Bor South	More	207	0.48
Bor South	No impact	101	0.24
Bor South	Prefer not to answer	19	0.04

Q.11.9 If changes in the climate or weather patterns continue to worsen at the same rate that they are changing now, how would this impact your need to migrate?

All the answers are in a scale of 1-6, i.e. can have the following values: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6.

Ex: 1 = Significantly Increase 2 = Moderately Increase 3 = Will not Impact 4 = Moderately Decrease 5 = Significantly Decrease 6 = Don’t know -2. Prefer not to answer

Entire sample

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
Moderately Increase	1270	0.34
Moderately Decrease	669	0.18
Significantly Increase	639	0.17
Will not Impact	565	0.15
Don’t know	309	0.08
Significantly Decrease	181	0.05
Prefer not to answer	52	0.01

By county

County	Mean Response (1 to 5)
Bor South	2.5
Kajo-keji	3.2
Lainya	2.9
Malakal	2.6
Morobo	3.0
Pibor	2.7
Rubkona	2.2
Wau	3.7
Yei	2.8

Q1.5_County	Q.11.9	answers	percentage
Yei	Don’t know	4	0.01
Yei	Moderately Decrease	116	0.28
Yei	Moderately Increase	169	0.41
Yei	Significantly Decrease	16	0.04
Yei	Significantly Increase	36	0.09
Yei	Will not Impact	69	0.17
Wau	Don’t know	104	0.26
Wau	Moderately Decrease	67	0.17
Wau	Moderately Increase	91	0.23
Wau	Prefer not to answer	8	0.02
Wau	Significantly Decrease	48	0.12
Wau	Significantly Increase	53	0.13
Wau	Will not Impact	31	0.08
Rubkona	Don’t know	3	0.01
Rubkona	Moderately Decrease	53	0.13
Rubkona	Moderately Increase	166	0.42
Rubkona	Prefer not to answer	8	0.02
Rubkona	Significantly Decrease	18	0.04
Rubkona	Significantly Increase	117	0.29
Rubkona	Will not Impact	35	0.09
Pibor	Don’t know	29	0.07
Pibor	Moderately Decrease	48	0.12
Pibor	Moderately Increase	120	0.29
Pibor	Significantly Decrease	11	0.03
Pibor	Significantly Increase	85	0.21
Pibor	Will not Impact	114	0.28
Morobo	Don’t know	7	0.02
Morobo	Moderately Decrease	103	0.25
Morobo	Moderately Increase	73	0.18
Morobo	Significantly Decrease	38	0.09
Morobo	Significantly Increase	66	0.16
Morobo	Will not Impact	117	0.29
Malakal	Don’t know	26	0.06
Malakal	Moderately Decrease	78	0.19
Malakal	Moderately Increase	141	0.33
Malakal	Significantly Decrease	6	0.01
Malakal	Significantly Increase	101	0.24
Malakal	Will not Impact	69	0.16
Lainya	Don’t know	28	0.07
Lainya	Moderately Decrease	68	0.16
Lainya	Moderately Increase	139	0.34
Lainya	Prefer not to answer	3	0.01
Lainya	Significantly Decrease	19	0.05
Lainya	Significantly Increase	51	0.12
Lainya	Will not Impact	106	0.26
Kajo-keji	Don’t know	43	0.11
Kajo-keji	Moderately Decrease	123	0.31
Kajo-keji	Moderately Increase	167	0.42
Kajo-keji	Prefer not to answer	16	0.04
Kajo-keji	Significantly Decrease	12	0.03
Kajo-keji	Significantly Increase	16	0.04
Kajo-keji	Will not Impact	21	0.05
Bor South	Don’t know	65	0.15
Bor South	Moderately Decrease	13	0.03
Bor South	Moderately Increase	204	0.48
Bor South	Prefer not to answer	17	0.04
Bor South	Significantly Decrease	13	0.03
Bor South	Significantly Increase	114	0.27
Bor South	Will not Impact	3	0.01

10) Policy and Programmatic Recommendations

Q12.1 The United Nations Mission in South Sudan is providing different types of assistance in this county. On a scale from 1 to 5, where 1 means “very bad” and 5 means “very good,” how good of a job would you say that the United Nations is doing in the following areas?

Q12.1.1 Improving the physical security of civilians

Entire sample

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
Good	2039	0.55
Very good	685	0.19
Neither good nor bad	410	0.11
Bad	350	0.09
Very bad	169	0.05
_2. Prefer not to answer	32	0.01

By county

Q1.5_County	Q12.1.1	answers	percentage
Yei	Very bad	2	0.00
Yei	Bad	6	0.01
Yei	Neither good nor bad	53	0.13
Yei	Good	300	0.73
Yei	Very good	49	0.12
Wau	Very bad	11	0.03
Wau	Bad	12	0.03
Wau	Neither good nor bad	77	0.19
Wau	Good	201	0.50
Wau	Very good	91	0.23
Wau	_2. Prefer not to answer	10	0.02
Rubkona	Very bad	31	0.08
Rubkona	Bad	13	0.03
Rubkona	Neither good nor bad	16	0.04
Rubkona	Good	226	0.56
Rubkona	Very good	113	0.28
Rubkona	_2. Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Pibor	Very bad	35	0.09
Pibor	Bad	73	0.18
Pibor	Neither good nor bad	82	0.20
Pibor	Good	173	0.43
Pibor	Very good	39	0.10
Pibor	_2. Prefer not to answer	5	0.01
Morobo	Very bad	6	0.01
Morobo	Bad	32	0.08
Morobo	Neither good nor bad	25	0.06
Morobo	Good	283	0.70
Morobo	Very good	56	0.14
Morobo	_2. Prefer not to answer	2	0.00
Malakal	Very bad	32	0.08
Malakal	Bad	108	0.26
Malakal	Neither good nor bad	34	0.08
Malakal	Good	223	0.53
Malakal	Very good	24	0.06
Lainya	Very bad	36	0.09
Lainya	Bad	39	0.09
Lainya	Neither good nor bad	59	0.14
Lainya	Good	208	0.50
Lainya	Very good	65	0.16
Lainya	_2. Prefer not to answer	7	0.02
Kajo-keji	Very bad	12	0.03
Kajo-keji	Bad	23	0.06
Kajo-keji	Neither good nor bad	28	0.07
Kajo-keji	Good	213	0.54
Kajo-keji	Very good	115	0.29
Kajo-keji	_2. Prefer not to answer	7	0.02
Bor South	Very bad	4	0.01
Bor South	Bad	44	0.10
Bor South	Neither good nor bad	36	0.08
Bor South	Good	212	0.49
Bor South	Very good	133	0.31

Q12.1.2 Preventing, mitigating, and resolving intercommunal violence

Entire sample

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
Good	1965	0.53
Very good	704	0.19
Neither good nor bad	438	0.12
Bad	404	0.11
Very bad	150	0.04
_2. Prefer not to answer	24	0.01

By county

Q1.5_County	Q12.1.2	answers	percentage
Yei	Bad	27	0.07
Yei	Neither good nor bad	50	0.12
Yei	Good	292	0.71
Yei	Very good	41	0.10
Wau	Very bad	8	0.02
Wau	Bad	10	0.02
Wau	Neither good nor bad	106	0.26
Wau	Good	191	0.48
Wau	Very good	82	0.20
Wau	_2. Prefer not to answer	5	0.01
Rubkona	Very bad	30	0.07
Rubkona	Bad	17	0.04
Rubkona	Neither good nor bad	16	0.04
Rubkona	Good	224	0.56
Rubkona	Very good	112	0.28
Rubkona	_2. Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Pibor	Very bad	39	0.10
Pibor	Bad	90	0.22
Pibor	Neither good nor bad	86	0.21
Pibor	Good	143	0.35
Pibor	Very good	44	0.11
Pibor	_2. Prefer not to answer	5	0.01
Morobo	Very bad	10	0.02
Morobo	Bad	33	0.08
Morobo	Neither good nor bad	38	0.09
Morobo	Good	248	0.61
Morobo	Very good	75	0.19
Malakal	Very bad	24	0.06
Malakal	Bad	127	0.30
Malakal	Neither good nor bad	20	0.05
Malakal	Good	223	0.53
Malakal	Very good	27	0.06
Lainya	Very bad	32	0.08
Lainya	Bad	49	0.12
Lainya	Neither good nor bad	48	0.12
Lainya	Good	208	0.50
Lainya	Very good	68	0.16
Lainya	_2. Prefer not to answer	9	0.02
Kajo-keji	Very bad	6	0.02
Kajo-keji	Bad	10	0.03
Kajo-keji	Neither good nor bad	29	0.07
Kajo-keji	Good	254	0.64
Kajo-keji	Very good	95	0.24
Kajo-keji	_2. Prefer not to answer	4	0.01
Bor South	Very bad	1	0.00
Bor South	Bad	41	0.10
Bor South	Neither good nor bad	45	0.10
Bor South	Good	182	0.42
Bor South	Very good	160	0.37

Q12.1.3 Providing humanitarian assistance, such as food and shelter

Entire sample

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
Good	1885	0.51
Very good	975	0.26
Neither good nor bad	393	0.11
Bad	283	0.08
Very bad	118	0.03
_2. Prefer not to answer	31	0.01

By county

Q1.5_County	Q12.1.3	answers	percentage
Yei	Very bad	6	0.01
Yei	Bad	33	0.08
Yei	Neither good nor bad	55	0.13
Yei	Good	265	0.65
Yei	Very good	51	0.12
Wau	Very bad	6	0.01
Wau	Bad	19	0.05
Wau	Neither good nor bad	73	0.18
Wau	Good	193	0.48
Wau	Very good	108	0.27
Wau	_2. Prefer not to answer	3	0.01
Rubkona	Very bad	6	0.01
Rubkona	Bad	6	0.01
Rubkona	Neither good nor bad	17	0.04
Rubkona	Good	180	0.45
Rubkona	Very good	189	0.47
Rubkona	_2. Prefer not to answer	2	0.00
Pibor	Very bad	28	0.07
Pibor	Bad	37	0.09
Pibor	Neither good nor bad	84	0.21
Pibor	Good	196	0.48
Pibor	Very good	57	0.14
Pibor	_2. Prefer not to answer	5	0.01
Morobo	Very bad	12	0.03
Morobo	Bad	37	0.09
Morobo	Neither good nor bad	22	0.05
Morobo	Good	228	0.56
Morobo	Very good	104	0.26
Morobo	_2. Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Malakal	Very bad	35	0.08
Malakal	Bad	102	0.24
Malakal	Neither good nor bad	10	0.02
Malakal	Good	245	0.58
Malakal	Very good	29	0.07
Lainya	Very bad	19	0.05
Lainya	Bad	21	0.05
Lainya	Neither good nor bad	40	0.10
Lainya	Good	195	0.47
Lainya	Very good	123	0.30
Lainya	_2. Prefer not to answer	16	0.04
Kajo-keji	Very bad	6	0.02
Kajo-keji	Bad	17	0.04
Kajo-keji	Neither good nor bad	18	0.05
Kajo-keji	Good	211	0.53
Kajo-keji	Very good	142	0.36
Kajo-keji	_2. Prefer not to answer	4	0.01
Bor South	Bad	11	0.03
Bor South	Neither good nor bad	74	0.17
Bor South	Good	172	0.40
Bor South	Very good	172	0.40

Q12.1.4 Supporting the return, relocation, resettlement, or integration of internally displaced persons

Entire sample

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
Good	1949	0.53
Very good	845	0.23
Neither good nor bad	428	0.12
Bad	321	0.09
Very bad	116	0.03
_2. Prefer not to answer	26	0.01

By county

Q1.5_County	Q12.1.4	answers	percentage
Yei	Very bad	3	0.01
Yei	Bad	34	0.08
Yei	Neither good nor bad	65	0.16
Yei	Good	278	0.68
Yei	Very good	30	0.07
Wau	Very bad	4	0.01
Wau	Bad	6	0.01
Wau	Neither good nor bad	78	0.19
Wau	Good	232	0.58
Wau	Very good	80	0.20
Wau	_2. Prefer not to answer	2	0.00
Rubkona	Very bad	4	0.01
Rubkona	Bad	10	0.03
Rubkona	Neither good nor bad	12	0.03
Rubkona	Good	202	0.50
Rubkona	Very good	169	0.42
Rubkona	_2. Prefer not to answer	3	0.01
Pibor	Very bad	24	0.06
Pibor	Bad	58	0.14
Pibor	Neither good nor bad	82	0.20
Pibor	Good	176	0.43
Pibor	Very good	62	0.15
Pibor	_2. Prefer not to answer	5	0.01
Morobo	Very bad	16	0.04
Morobo	Bad	35	0.09
Morobo	Neither good nor bad	50	0.12
Morobo	Good	220	0.54
Morobo	Very good	83	0.21
Malakal	Very bad	11	0.03
Malakal	Bad	93	0.22
Malakal	Neither good nor bad	14	0.03
Malakal	Good	262	0.62
Malakal	Very good	41	0.10
Lainya	Very bad	46	0.11
Lainya	Bad	33	0.08
Lainya	Neither good nor bad	34	0.08
Lainya	Good	185	0.45
Lainya	Very good	105	0.25
Lainya	_2. Prefer not to answer	11	0.03
Kajo-keji	Very bad	6	0.02
Kajo-keji	Bad	24	0.06
Kajo-keji	Neither good nor bad	28	0.07
Kajo-keji	Good	206	0.52
Kajo-keji	Very good	129	0.32
Kajo-keji	_2. Prefer not to answer	5	0.01
Bor South	Very bad	2	0.00
Bor South	Bad	28	0.07
Bor South	Neither good nor bad	65	0.15
Bor South	Good	188	0.44
Bor South	Very good	146	0.34

Q12.1.5 Neutrality, meaning, not supporting any political, ethnic, or armed group over another

Entire sample

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
Good	1766	0.48
Very good	927	0.25
Neither good nor bad	499	0.14
Bad	347	0.09
Very bad	92	0.02
_2. Prefer not to answer	54	0.01

By county

Q1.5_County	Q12.1.5	answers	percentage
Yei	Very bad	4	0.01
Yei	Bad	36	0.09
Yei	Neither good nor bad	72	0.18
Yei	Good	238	0.58
Yei	Very good	59	0.14
Yei	_2. Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Wau	Very bad	9	0.02
Wau	Bad	6	0.01
Wau	Neither good nor bad	86	0.21
Wau	Good	215	0.53
Wau	Very good	60	0.15
Wau	_2. Prefer not to answer	26	0.06
Rubkona	Very bad	5	0.01
Rubkona	Bad	10	0.03
Rubkona	Neither good nor bad	21	0.05
Rubkona	Good	174	0.44
Rubkona	Very good	184	0.46
Rubkona	_2. Prefer not to answer	6	0.01
Pibor	Very bad	18	0.04
Pibor	Bad	71	0.17
Pibor	Neither good nor bad	90	0.22
Pibor	Good	177	0.43
Pibor	Very good	46	0.11
Pibor	_2. Prefer not to answer	5	0.01
Morobo	Very bad	15	0.04
Morobo	Bad	62	0.15
Morobo	Neither good nor bad	48	0.12
Morobo	Good	181	0.45
Morobo	Very good	98	0.24
Malakal	Very bad	6	0.01
Malakal	Bad	95	0.23
Malakal	Neither good nor bad	36	0.09
Malakal	Good	251	0.60
Malakal	Very good	32	0.08
Malakal	_2. Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Lainya	Very bad	31	0.07
Lainya	Bad	32	0.08
Lainya	Neither good nor bad	56	0.14
Lainya	Good	194	0.47
Lainya	Very good	97	0.23
Lainya	_2. Prefer not to answer	4	0.01
Kajo-keji	Very bad	4	0.01
Kajo-keji	Bad	21	0.05
Kajo-keji	Neither good nor bad	27	0.07
Kajo-keji	Good	187	0.47
Kajo-keji	Very good	149	0.37
Kajo-keji	_2. Prefer not to answer	10	0.03
Bor South	Bad	14	0.03
Bor South	Neither good nor bad	63	0.15
Bor South	Good	149	0.35
Bor South	Very good	202	0.47
Bor South	_2. Prefer not to answer	1	0.00

Q12.4 How fairly or unfairly do you feel that economic and material assistance from the United Nations to this boma is being distributed among different groups of people?

Entire sample

Response	Number of Responses	Percent of Total Responses
Very fairly	1316	0.36
Somewhat fairly	1059	0.29
Very unfairly	418	0.11
Neither unfairly nor fairly	410	0.11
Somewhat unfairly	343	0.09
3._Don’t_know	98	0.03
_2. Prefer not to answer	26	0.01
NA	15	0.00

By county

Q1.5_County	Q12.4	answers	percentage
Yei	Very unfairly	25	0.06
Yei	Somewhat unfairly	41	0.10
Yei	Neither unfairly nor fairly	37	0.09
Yei	Somewhat fairly	141	0.34
Yei	Very fairly	163	0.40
Yei	3._Don’t_know	2	0.00
Yei	NA	1	0.00
Wau	Very unfairly	12	0.03
Wau	Somewhat unfairly	22	0.05
Wau	Neither unfairly nor fairly	52	0.13
Wau	Somewhat fairly	150	0.37
Wau	Very fairly	140	0.35
Wau	_2. Prefer not to answer	4	0.01
Wau	3._Don’t_know	20	0.05
Wau	NA	2	0.00
Rubkona	Very unfairly	30	0.07
Rubkona	Somewhat unfairly	48	0.12
Rubkona	Neither unfairly nor fairly	16	0.04
Rubkona	Somewhat fairly	95	0.24
Rubkona	Very fairly	202	0.50
Rubkona	_2. Prefer not to answer	4	0.01
Rubkona	3._Don’t_know	4	0.01
Rubkona	NA	1	0.00
Pibor	Very unfairly	28	0.07
Pibor	Somewhat unfairly	80	0.20
Pibor	Neither unfairly nor fairly	81	0.20
Pibor	Somewhat fairly	108	0.27
Pibor	Very fairly	90	0.22
Pibor	_2. Prefer not to answer	3	0.01
Pibor	3._Don’t_know	15	0.04
Pibor	NA	2	0.00
Morobo	Very unfairly	125	0.31
Morobo	Somewhat unfairly	34	0.08
Morobo	Neither unfairly nor fairly	34	0.08
Morobo	Somewhat fairly	84	0.21
Morobo	Very fairly	116	0.29
Morobo	_2. Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Morobo	3._Don’t_know	7	0.02
Morobo	NA	3	0.01
Malakal	Very unfairly	48	0.11
Malakal	Somewhat unfairly	39	0.09
Malakal	Neither unfairly nor fairly	33	0.08
Malakal	Somewhat fairly	202	0.48
Malakal	Very fairly	92	0.22
Malakal	_2. Prefer not to answer	1	0.00
Malakal	3._Don’t_know	2	0.00
Malakal	NA	4	0.01
Lainya	Very unfairly	60	0.14
Lainya	Somewhat unfairly	43	0.10
Lainya	Neither unfairly nor fairly	64	0.15
Lainya	Somewhat fairly	90	0.22
Lainya	Very fairly	135	0.33
Lainya	_2. Prefer not to answer	3	0.01
Lainya	3._Don’t_know	19	0.05
Kajo-keji	Very unfairly	68	0.17
Kajo-keji	Somewhat unfairly	16	0.04
Kajo-keji	Neither unfairly nor fairly	25	0.06
Kajo-keji	Somewhat fairly	104	0.26
Kajo-keji	Very fairly	155	0.39
Kajo-keji	_2. Prefer not to answer	8	0.02
Kajo-keji	3._Don’t_know	21	0.05
Kajo-keji	NA	1	0.00
Bor South	Very unfairly	22	0.05
Bor South	Somewhat unfairly	20	0.05
Bor South	Neither unfairly nor fairly	68	0.16
Bor South	Somewhat fairly	85	0.20
Bor South	Very fairly	223	0.52
Bor South	_2. Prefer not to answer	2	0.00
Bor South	3._Don’t_know	8	0.02
Bor South	NA	1	0.00