Background
Background on project objectives and questions to be asked
Thank you for agreeing to take part in this online expert elicitation
to help inform the development of a national recovery strategy for red
squirrels in England. In this exercise, we will seek your expert
judgment on a number of parameters that influence red squirrel
population dynamics. These parameters span a range of topics, including
the life history characteristics of red and grey squirrels, the
epidemiology of squirrelpox virus, and the effectiveness of grey
squirrel management strategies. Your answers will directly feed into a
large-scale population model that aims to predict the recovery of red
squirrels under different biological and management scenarios.
Essentially, your expertise will help parameterise the model and include
uncertainty, ensuring that it reflects the best available knowledge
about these species and their interactions.
Admin annotations: Keep in mind the point of this
discussion is not to get everyone to agree on a single value, or to
convince each other of the values they put in. We want to make sure
everyone is a) answering the same questions (i.e. interpreting the
questions the same way), b) answering the questions using the same
information and insight.
A - Part I. Squirrel life history
Breeding
Question A.2
How many litters do you expect an average female
squirrel of each species to have per year, under ideal conditions
(i.e. in a woodland where inter- and intra-specific competition is
negligible)?
Admin annotations: In general, high consensus around 1 to 2
litter per species. Some experts are showing low confidence which
increases the tail a lot. Also a slight signal of greys reproducing
slightly more often than reds. One expert had a pretty high estimate for
greys, though. One expert (“H”) points out number is lower because not
all females reproduce each year (therefore average number of
litters per female can be lower than 0)
|
Species
|
Expert
|
Minimum Plausible
|
Most Likely
|
Maximum Plausible
|
Confidence
|
|
Grey
|
B
|
0
|
2.0
|
4
|
85
|
|
D
|
0
|
6.0
|
7
|
60
|
|
E
|
1
|
2.0
|
3
|
98
|
|
H
|
0
|
1.0
|
2
|
80
|
|
I
|
2
|
2.5
|
3
|
100
|
|
J
|
0
|
3.0
|
3
|
85
|
|
K
|
0
|
3.0
|
4
|
100
|
|
L
|
1
|
2.0
|
3
|
80
|
|
O
|
0
|
1.2
|
3
|
100
|
|
Q
|
1
|
2.0
|
3
|
100
|
|
Red
|
B
|
0
|
2.0
|
2
|
100
|
|
C
|
0
|
1.3
|
2
|
90
|
|
D
|
0
|
1.5
|
3
|
70
|
|
E
|
1
|
2.0
|
2
|
95
|
|
G
|
0
|
2.0
|
2
|
100
|
|
H
|
0
|
0.0
|
1
|
100
|
|
I
|
1
|
2.0
|
3
|
100
|
|
J
|
0
|
2.0
|
2
|
100
|
|
K
|
0
|
2.0
|
3
|
100
|
|
L
|
1
|
2.0
|
2
|
90
|
|
N
|
2
|
2.0
|
4
|
100
|
|
O
|
0
|
1.3
|
3
|
100
|
|
Q
|
1
|
1.0
|
2
|
80
|
Comments
Grey
-
H: Based on 7 years of trap and sample records from free-living
greys in South Cumbria, Yorkshire and North Wales. Published research
and our own findings with captive squirrels suggests that, if there are
sufficient food resources, some females will breed twice per year. This
will not happen every year not all females in a population will breed in
the same year, so overall I believe the average will be around 1. In
some environments this may be higher due to increased resources.
-
K: Personal experience and records from others of catching
lactating and pregnant females throughout the year.
-
O: On average, about 205 of females will produce 2 litters
-
I: Because we are always actively culling Grey Squirrels at every
opportunity it is not possible to know precisely how many broods each
female has in a 12 month period, but the fact that we have culled wet
females every month of the year it seems that they must be able to have
at least 3 broods if availability of food and climatic conditions are
suitable in a good year.
Red
-
H: From the literature I have read, it is likely that red
squirrel breeding is limited to some females in a population, not all
-
E: Typically two litters per year, whilst grey can have up to
three if conditions permit.
-
K: personal experience and records from Yorkshire Arboretum of
captive red having 3 litters in one year.
-
O: Most females will produce 1 litter, some 2 litters - say
20-40%
-
I: In a particular woodland which is monitored on a daily basis
and where we are confident that Grey Squirrels are agressively and
selectively removed by shooting, rather than trapping we have seen three
Red females haveing two broods in a year. Last year at York Arboretum
one of the female Red Squirrels is recorded to hav had three broods.
-
G: Be aware that this is influenced by food supply as well as the
age of the female with young females likely only having one.
Question A.3
How many individuals do you expect to survive after weaning from a
single litter produced by an average female of each
species of squirrel, under ideal conditions (i.e., in a woodland where
inter- and intra-specific competition is negligible)?
Admin annotations: Similar to above, high consensus.
Confidence lower (it is a harder process to observe directly), and
slight advantage for greys, again.
|
Species
|
Expert
|
Minimum Plausible
|
Most Likely
|
Maximum Plausible
|
Confidence
|
|
Grey
|
B
|
0
|
4
|
8
|
80
|
|
D
|
1
|
4
|
5
|
55
|
|
E
|
2
|
3
|
8
|
80
|
|
H
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
80
|
|
I
|
2
|
3
|
5
|
100
|
|
J
|
0
|
2
|
3
|
96
|
|
K
|
0
|
5
|
6
|
100
|
|
L
|
0
|
2
|
4
|
61
|
|
N
|
1
|
6
|
6
|
100
|
|
O
|
0
|
3
|
9
|
100
|
|
Red
|
B
|
1
|
2
|
4
|
100
|
|
C
|
0
|
3
|
6
|
90
|
|
D
|
0
|
3
|
4
|
60
|
|
E
|
1
|
3
|
6
|
80
|
|
G
|
1
|
3
|
4
|
100
|
|
I
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
87
|
|
J
|
0
|
2
|
3
|
98
|
|
K
|
0
|
3
|
5
|
100
|
|
L
|
0
|
1
|
4
|
80
|
|
N
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
100
|
|
O
|
1
|
2
|
6
|
100
|
|
Q
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
50
|
Comments
Grey
-
H: Based on published literature - probability of juvenile
survival vs average litter
-
K: Personal experience of clearing a small woodland of a ‘family’
of greys.
-
I: Again because I only have experiece in woodlands where we are
acitively controlling grey squirrels my experience is distorted as I do
not have any evidence of where active culling of greys doesn’t take
place. I think natural predation of Grey Squirel kits is likely to be
similar to that which we have witnessed with Red Squirrels. We have
several records of removing all Grey Squirrels from individual woodlands
and we have shot entire broods of kitts out of maternal dreys, including
the adult female, so my evidence is very distorted from what would
happen without lethal control being undertaken.
Red
-
E: Average no. kittens per litter is 3-4 but can have up to 6
(for reds). From my understanding, most of the litter seems to survive
to weaning, unless something affects the drey (e.g. storm).
-
G: Adult survival based on collars is very high and can be over
90% the critical period is the first year and here there are few data as
most studies have some indication of litter size but there is very
little data on juvenile dispeersers and their survival. Estimates range
as high as 75% mortality but this will be dependent on food availability
as well as local density
-
K: Reports of captive breeding.
-
C: Survive to what point?, I’m asuming into the next year and
adulthood
-
I: In reality there are so many vaariables it is difficult if not
impossible to be sure of the outcome. We have witnessed a fox taking a
young Red kit which was foraging on the ground. We have found a badly
damaged Red kit, which appeared to have puncture injuries, probably from
a buzzard or sparrow hawk. We have watched 4-5 kits running playfully in
the canopy as they have literally just come out of the maternal drey for
the first time. After a month or two then they disperse so it is very
difficult to be sure which are young and which are older, although some
older Reds have distinctive colouration of patterns of coat which
enables you to visually idetify some individuals.
C. Squirrelpox
Squirrelpox virus (SQPV) plays a crucial role in shaping the
population dynamics of red and grey squirrels in the UK. The impact of
the disease differs significantly between the two species. For red
squirrels, SQPV infection is invariably fatal, with no assumed recovery
under any circumstances. Grey squirrels, on the other hand, are assumed
to survive SQPV infection without mortality, acting primarily as
asymptomatic carriers. Additionally, we recognize that both the
likelihood of mortality (in red squirrels) and the recovery process (in
grey squirrels) may vary between juveniles and adults of each species.
In this section, we ask for your expert judgment on key parameters of
SQPV epidemiology, including the time it takes for red squirrels to
succumb to the virus, the recovery time for grey squirrels, and the
likelihood of reinfection in previously exposed grey squirrels.
Disease progression
Question C.1
Given that either a juvenile or adult red squirrel
becomes infected with squirrelpox virus (SQPV), what is the expected
time it will take until the individual dies, in
days?

Admin annotations: This question is not very controversial
either. There is extensive information for disease progression adults
from experimental infections and field observations. That is reflected
in the comments. Because less information is available for infected
juveniles, intervals were wider.
|
Age
|
Expert
|
Minimum Plausible
|
Most Likely
|
Maximum Plausible
|
Confidence
|
|
Adult
|
A
|
12
|
18
|
35
|
75
|
|
D
|
2
|
14
|
15
|
50
|
|
E
|
7
|
10
|
15
|
85
|
|
I
|
8
|
10
|
14
|
100
|
|
K
|
0
|
10
|
14
|
72
|
|
L
|
7
|
10
|
14
|
81
|
|
M
|
3
|
7
|
21
|
90
|
|
O
|
7
|
14
|
21
|
100
|
|
P
|
7
|
14
|
28
|
81
|
|
Q
|
1
|
1
|
14
|
80
|
|
B
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
100
|
|
J
|
0
|
14
|
0
|
100
|
|
N
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
100
|
|
Juvenile
|
A
|
12
|
18
|
35
|
75
|
|
B
|
3
|
12
|
15
|
95
|
|
D
|
2
|
14
|
15
|
50
|
|
E
|
7
|
10
|
15
|
85
|
|
I
|
5
|
8
|
14
|
100
|
|
K
|
0
|
10
|
14
|
69
|
|
L
|
5
|
10
|
14
|
70
|
|
M
|
2
|
4
|
15
|
75
|
|
N
|
0
|
10
|
21
|
100
|
|
O
|
5
|
10
|
14
|
100
|
|
Q
|
1
|
14
|
14
|
90
|
|
P
|
7
|
28
|
14
|
80
|
Comments
Adult
-
A: Comment as for juveniles
-
P: This has only been experimentally conducted in adults. i would
expect juveniles to be more sensitive.
-
K: No evidence.
-
I: I have experience of Squirrel Pox affecting Reds, where there
is insufficient Grey control. I one particular wood where we have been
agressively controlling Grey Squirrels we haven’t seen a single case of
Squirrel Pox affecting Red Squirrels, the populations of Reds have
remained healthy but this has required a huge effort to kill all greys
as soon as they are identified, This has also required vigilance on the
part of the woodland owner and good communications and good hygiene of
squirrel feeders. We also use a specific feeder that is designed to be
capable of being sanitised and cleansed frequently and effectively..
Juvenile
-
A: Tompkins et al 2002 found that the time taken for development
of severe lesions and wt loss etc. (at an extent considered likely to
cause mortality in wild individuals) was 15-25 days. In 4 captive
squirrels of unspecified age (v. 4 unchallenged, control indivs)
-
E: Although juveniles seem to be more susceptible to catching the
disease.
-
B: this is an inexact science - experience suggests around 12
days, but depends on food availability and the ability to eat, alongside
secondary infections such as FED. The increased susceptibility to
predation will also lower the period.
-
L: I’m far less familiar with juvenile survival from this disease
than adult survival.
-
P: There is experimental data from A Sainsbury who conducted
infection studies which should give an approximate range and average for
adults
-
K: No evidence.
-
M: As far as I’m aware, we don’t have definitive data for the
difference in survivability of juvenile reds vs adults following
exposure to SQPV. However, inferring from other species and other
disease processes, it is likely that juveniles are more readily affected
and succumb to death more rapidly than adults which I’ve attempted to
represent in this answer.
Question C.2
Given that either a juvenile or adult grey squirrel
becomes infected with squirrelpox virus (SQPV), what is the expected
time it will take until the individual recovers, in
days?

Admin annotations: This one shows why we need a round of
discussions! The question was underspecified and too jargony. We have
two groups of estimates. The first one interpreted recovery as going
from infected (therefore infectious) to not infected anymore (due to
seroconversion or other mechanism). The other interpreted recovery as
going from being diseased (or experiencing symptoms) to not experiencing
them anymore. What the we wanted was the first one, but the question was
indeed unclear, as people pointed out in the comments. Also, one expert
had a high recovery time (i.e. infectious period), which might reflect a
different understanding of the epidemiological dynamics (see question
below).
If we truncated the plot to show a greater resolutions on the
lower estimates:

|
Age
|
Expert
|
Minimum Plausible
|
Most Likely
|
Maximum Plausible
|
Confidence
|
|
Adult
|
A
|
0
|
0
|
12
|
80
|
|
O
|
0
|
2
|
7
|
100
|
|
P
|
7
|
30
|
200
|
100
|
|
B
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
100
|
|
I
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
100
|
|
K
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
89
|
|
L
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
100
|
|
M
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
100
|
|
N
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
100
|
|
Q
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
100
|
|
Juvenile
|
A
|
0
|
0
|
12
|
80
|
|
M
|
1
|
3
|
14
|
65
|
|
O
|
0
|
3
|
7
|
100
|
|
P
|
10
|
30
|
180
|
51
|
|
I
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
100
|
|
K
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
87
|
|
L
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
100
|
|
N
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
100
|
|
Q
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
100
|
Comments
Adult
-
A: Same comment as for juveniles
-
P: ### Really important fact: grey adults can become reinfected
with Sqpox (or it goes latent) so they can have an intermittent viraemia
with periodic shedding for several months. The infection intensity is
less than with a primary infection. This is comparatively uncommon ###
-
K: They do not get ill and do not have to ‘recover.’
Juvenile
-
A: Can you clarify what ‘recovery’ means in this context? Below
you refer to it as the time for development of a sufficient antibody
response? For now I’ve taken it to mean clinical recovery - although
it’s assumed that, as per published literature (e.g. Tompkins et al
2002), grey squirrels are not clinically affected at all so there is no
‘recovery period’ per se….
-
B: greys typically are asymptomatic. I have never seen one with
any symptoms of SQPV
-
P: The infectious period in greys can last as long as 6 months.
-
K: I understood that only one grey has ever been found to have
symptoms of pox so it seems that they do not get ill with the disease
and therefore do not have a recovery time.
-
M: Given that greys typically do not develop disease, it is
difficult to state what is meant by ‘recovery’? Is this time to
seroconversion or something else?
-
I: I have not seen any adult of juvenile grey displayong SQPV
virius syptoms in the wild
Immune response
Howell
et al. 2004 has proposed a new mechanism for squirrepolx
epidemiology, where grey squirrels infected with squirrelpox virus
(SQPV) can become reinfected even after developing antibodies,
indicating that immunity is partial or waning rather than lifelong.
Field data showed that seropositive grey squirrels often experience
repeated cycles of infection and recovery, with a high prevalence of
viraemic individuals in the population. Experimental findings further
suggest that seroconversion may require multiple infection challenges,
and once antibodies are developed, they persist but do not fully prevent
reinfection. These results underscore the complexity of immune responses
in grey squirrels and the role of partial immunity in sustaining SQPV
dynamics within their populations. For the purposes of this exercise, we
assume that grey squirrels develop partial immunity from SQPV.
Question C.3
If a grey squirrel has previously been infected with SQPV and has
subsequently recovered (i.e., it has developed an immune response to the
disease), what is the relative likelihood that it will become reinfected
if exposed under the same epidemiological conditions as its previous
initial infection? Assume all other factors remain constant, including
habitat, the density of infected individuals in the area, and
environmental conditions. NOTE: This is a relative comparison. If
you believe the likelihood of reinfection for a seropositive grey
squirrel is identical to its initial infection risk, your answer
should be 100%. If you believe that a recovered grey
squirrel would never be reinfected, your answer should be
0%.

|
Expert
|
Minimum Plausible
|
Most Likely
|
Maximum Plausible
|
Confidence
|
|
A
|
60
|
90
|
100
|
75
|
|
M
|
50
|
60
|
90
|
60
|
|
O
|
20
|
50
|
90
|
100
|
|
P
|
40
|
60
|
80
|
80
|
|
I
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
100
|
|
N
|
100
|
100
|
100
|
100
|
|
Q
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
100
|
Comments
Relative susceptibility
-
A: Inferred from Tompkins et al 2002 & Chantrey et al 2019
-
P: We showed greys in the wild get reinfected or are latently
infected. Recurrence was frequent. Immunity seemed to be transient.
Epidemics. 2019 Sep;28:100352. doi: 10.1016/j.epidem.2019.100352.
-
M: Antibody responses are generally thought to be incompletely
effective in greys and it is likely that some degree of reinfection
potential persists. There is also some suggestion of recrudescence,
which is unusual for a pox virus infection. The exact nature of this
reinfection probability is unfortunately difficult to quantify and seems
to vary markedly between individuals.
-
I: Having never seen a single case of SQVP in grey squirrels in
the wild, i think that this is a hugely acedemic theory without
relevance in the real world. I believe that grey squirrels my be A
symptomatic in the ame way that some humans may be A symptomatic for
Covid and other viruses
Vaccination
Vaccination has the potential to be a transformative tool in
mitigating the impacts of squirrelpox virus (SQPV) on red squirrel
populations. By conferring immunity to individuals, a successful
vaccination program could reduce mortality rates and increase the
viability of red squirrel populations. However, the effectiveness of
such a program depends on several factors, including the likelihood of
vaccine development, the expected timeline for its availability, and its
efficacy.
Question C.4
What is the probability that an effective vaccine for squirrelpox
virus (SQPV), specifically for use in red squirrel populations, will be
successfully developed and made widely available for use by landowners,
government organizations, and conservation groups?

Some experts seem to have expressed the value in a 0%-100% scale
instead of 0-1. If we correct for that, the new plot is

Admin annotations: Crazy high uncertainty, with some
diverging views on how likely it is to happen. This is expected, as
there is no current development in place and there are too many
unknowns. We fully understand that, however vaccination is a consistent
action being proposed as a possible course of action, therefore we
cannot shy away to evaluating it. On the other hand, we also cannot just
assume it will happen, hence these uncomfortable
questions.
|
Expert
|
Minimum Plausible
|
Most Likely
|
Maximum Plausible
|
Confidence
|
|
C
|
0.2
|
0.40
|
0.5
|
75
|
|
D
|
0.0
|
0.20
|
0.8
|
50
|
|
E
|
0.5
|
0.70
|
0.9
|
55
|
|
J
|
0.0
|
0.30
|
1.0
|
81
|
|
K
|
0.0
|
0.50
|
1.0
|
88
|
|
M
|
0.0
|
0.01
|
0.5
|
80
|
|
N
|
0.0
|
1.00
|
1.0
|
100
|
|
O
|
0.0
|
0.50
|
1.0
|
100
|
|
Q
|
0.1
|
0.30
|
0.5
|
50
|
|
A
|
20.0
|
50.00
|
70.0
|
75
|
|
B
|
0.0
|
0.00
|
0.0
|
100
|
|
H
|
0.0
|
0.00
|
0.0
|
100
|
|
I
|
1.0
|
1.00
|
3.0
|
80
|
|
P
|
5.0
|
20.00
|
30.0
|
71
|
Comments
SQPV Vaccine Development Probability
-
A: The Moredun Institute apparently had a project looking to
develop a vaccine and did develop a prototype. But to be licensed, it
requires testing on a captive (experimental) red squirrel population.
Apparently the funders withdrew their support for the project at this
point, and it was a challenge to get formal institutional ethical
approval for the work (?). A vaccine (whether injectable or oral) would
also require field testing before more extensive roll out. This would be
expensive and timeconsuming. E.g. an oral vaccine for TB in badgers
(which would be much more practical than the current injectable vaccine
which is used for individuals in the field) has taken decades to develop
and is still not yet ready for implementation, despite significant
funding. Not that vaccination isn’t worth pursuing… But I wonder if
managing habitat/ecosystems for red recovery would perhaps be the better
focus and address one the key underlying drivers of disease
-
B: Given the progress of the contraceptive is measured on a
geological time scale and there is no strategy to deploy it, the chances
of a vaccine ever being developed and deployed are effectively zero. The
creation of a vaccine could become counter productive and SQPV may not
be the major disease risk.
-
K: A vaccine would be useful for an island population such as
Anglesey but in the rest of the country, even if the pox issue is
removed, there is still a problem that reds cannot live with greys which
outcompete them for food and habitat. Put the money into grey
eradication throughout the UK - immediately, not in five-ten years when
new tech is available. There will be no reds by then.
-
M: The main factors limiting vaccine delivery, viability and
availability would be an effective delivery method, which is not
currently achieved. Furthermore, the short generation time of red
squirrels and the potential incomplete and waning protection provided by
SQPV antibodies in greys suggests that a vaccine may only remain
effective for a short period of time, necessitating repeated extensive
vaccination of a large proportion of the red population to retain herd
immunity, which is unlikely to be feasible.
-
I: For small island populations this my be a possible solution if
a vaccine can be produced, but this is not proven. I cannot see how it
would be possible to trap and vaccinate every wild squirrel in the UK,
we do not even know where they all are!! Also there are recorded
fatalities of Red Squirrels being handled in captive populations, that
will also be a real risk if Red Squirrels are captured for vaccination
purposes.
-
C: Vaccine progress is being blocked, ‘hand in the rugby ruck
slowing the ball’ is a good analogy. Until the political interference
stops, those medelling are hampering progress.
Question C.5
If an SQPV vaccine is developed and approved as a management tool for
red squirrel populations, by what year is it expected to become widely
available?

Some experts seem to have expressed the value in “years from now”
instead of calendar years. If we correct for that, the new plot
is

Admin annotations: Same as above.
|
Expert
|
Minimum Plausible
|
Most Likely
|
Maximum Plausible
|
Confidence
|
|
A
|
2028
|
2034
|
2050
|
75
|
|
B
|
2030
|
2050
|
2099
|
100
|
|
C
|
2030
|
2034
|
2040
|
80
|
|
E
|
2025
|
2030
|
2035
|
55
|
|
M
|
2030
|
2045
|
2060
|
50
|
|
O
|
2025
|
2033
|
2040
|
100
|
|
K
|
0
|
5
|
10
|
88
|
|
N
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
100
|
|
P
|
5
|
15
|
30
|
65
|
|
Q
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
100
|
Comments
SQPV Vaccine Rollout Year
-
B: This is many many years in the future and the issues
surrounding the development of a vaccine have not yet been addressed
-
K: Good luck!
-
M: This is an incredibly difficult question to answer with any
certainty. Given the potential hurdles of red squirrel SQPV vaccination
which have not been overcome, such as an effective delivery method and
maintenance of immunity across progressive generations, vaccine
development is likely to take a number of years. This is assuming that
these hurdles can be overcome at all, and there is a distinct
possibility that effective SQPV vaccination may never be an option.
Question C.6
For an individual red squirrel vaccinated against SQPV, what efficacy
would you expect such a vaccine to have (i.e., the probability that the
vaccinated individual will successfully seroconvert and develop immunity
to the virus)?

Some experts seem to have expressed the value in a 0%-100% scale
instead of 0-1. If we correct for that, the new plot is

Admin annotations: Same as above, with the added difficulty
that there is no current vaccine model (type, mode of delivery) to
specify against. One expert assumed the most likely mode of delivery
(oral bait through feeding stations) given it is the most (if not only)
practical one. Another expert assumed MRNA vaccines.
|
Expert
|
Minimum Plausible
|
Most Likely
|
Maximum Plausible
|
Confidence
|
|
C
|
0.70
|
0.85
|
0.95
|
55
|
|
E
|
0.50
|
0.80
|
0.90
|
55
|
|
M
|
0.20
|
0.50
|
0.80
|
50
|
|
O
|
0.40
|
0.80
|
1.00
|
100
|
|
P
|
0.01
|
0.40
|
0.70
|
50
|
|
A
|
15.00
|
75.00
|
85.00
|
60
|
|
N
|
1.00
|
1.00
|
1.00
|
100
|
Comments
SQPV Vaccine Efficacy
-
A: It depends how the vaccine is administered. An injectable
vaccine would be more likely to elicit immunity than an oral bait,
although the latter would be much more practical. For now, I’ve assumed
oral bait since this would probably be the only practical option a
geographically extensive vaccination campaign, and have assumed it would
be administered at feeding stations over multiple days (squirrels would
need to get acclimatised to feeders first)
-
M: Again, this is a very difficult question to answer, as the
vaccine which would be used in the field is not currently available or
undergone sufficient trials to allow estimation of potential protective
immunity in reds. However, given the push towards a feed delivered
vaccine, this is unlikely to reach 100% protection within a red
population.
-
C: assuming mrna - biggest risk is virus mutates and mrna becomes
less effective without redesign.
A - Part II. Squirrel life history
Understanding the life history traits of red and grey squirrels is
fundamental to predicting their population dynamics and informing
management strategies. These traits shape how these species respond to
environmental conditions and management interventions. In this section,
we will ask for your expert judgment on parameters such as breeding
season length, litter size, annual survival probabilities, and home
range sizes.
Breeding
Question A.1
Under current conditions, what is the average
length, in months, of the breeding season of each
species of squirrel (i.e. the window during the year when each species
engages in reproductive activities, including mating, gestation, and
giving birth to offspring)?

Admin annotations: Here we get to the first issue with
averages across habitats and enviromental conditions. First point, the
current models I am basing this one use one fixed breeding period,
across species and habitats (6 months). This is an effort to more
accurately express the dynamics of different “pulse dynamics” between
species and the trapping periods as well. We understand an average value
will not represent any particular woodland, but realized across the
woodlands in a tetrad, and across years, it should be representative.
That being said, the general pattern is that greys are able to reproduce
for longer periods throughout the year (maybe the whole year). One note
is that two experts had markedly lower values for red breeding window
than the others. This is likely because they were working under a
different definition of breeding period.
|
Species
|
Expert
|
Minimum Plausible
|
Most Likely
|
Maximum Plausible
|
Confidence
|
|
Grey
|
B
|
1
|
6
|
12
|
100
|
|
D
|
4
|
10
|
12
|
55
|
|
E
|
5
|
6
|
9
|
99
|
|
H
|
6
|
7
|
9
|
90
|
|
I
|
9
|
10
|
12
|
100
|
|
J
|
6
|
9
|
12
|
92
|
|
K
|
6
|
12
|
12
|
100
|
|
L
|
8
|
11
|
12
|
80
|
|
O
|
5
|
9
|
10
|
100
|
|
Q
|
8
|
9
|
9
|
100
|
|
Red
|
B
|
0
|
1
|
2
|
100
|
|
C
|
10
|
10
|
12
|
96
|
|
D
|
6
|
8
|
10
|
70
|
|
E
|
5
|
6
|
9
|
99
|
|
I
|
6
|
8
|
9
|
76
|
|
J
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
100
|
|
K
|
3
|
9
|
10
|
100
|
|
L
|
6
|
6
|
7
|
81
|
|
N
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
100
|
|
O
|
5
|
9
|
10
|
100
|
|
Q
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
100
|
|
G
|
10
|
10
|
10
|
100
|
Comments
Grey
-
H: This is very much an average based on our breeding records
from trapped free-living squirrels over the past 7 years and our captive
squirrel behaviour. I have heard that females have been found breeding
outside of these months, however, I have not personally seen any
evidence for this. My knowledge is specific to North Yorkshire, South
Cumbria and North Wales
-
B: Again, difficult to answer as greys seem to be breeding all
year round and producing several litters, but this is largely anecdotal
and may well be regional
-
K: Personal observations of catching pregnant and lactating
female greys throughout the year as well as very young adolescents.
-
O: Length of season depends on tree seed availability
-
I: I have personally culled pregnant females and young kits every
single month of the year. I have been undertaking active grey control
for the last 20+ years. I do find that December breeding is dependant on
the availability of food and to a lesser extent climatic conditions. I
hav also witnessed mating of squirrels in every month of the year.
Red
-
E: Two breeding seasons, approx. Feb-Apr and June-Aug but can
start in Dec.
-
B: this is difficult to answer, as the actual mating period only
lasts days, but can occur over several months
-
G: This is a poorly structured question. Define what you mean.
Each of the species has two breeding periods in a year - depending on
location start can be late Dec to October. With a break for individuals
inbetween the two but not for the population as breeding is not
synchronised.
-
K: Personal observations
-
O: Length of season depends on tree seed food availability
-
I: The breeding season varies year on year and seems to be
dependant upon climate and availability of food, both natural and
supplementry.
Survival
Question A.4
What is the average probability that a given
juvenile squirrel (of both species) will survive until
adulthood, under ideal conditions (i.e. in a woodland where inter- and
intra-specific competition is negligible, there is no squirrelpox virus,
no pine martens in the landscape and no lethal control being conducted)?
Assume a juvenile period of 9 months.

Two experts expressed values above 1 (but too low to be
reasonably interpreted as a percentage), so if we remove those:

Admin annotations: I think this is the first probability
question. So good to point out somethings. Here and throughout, there
are answers in probability that have the most likely as 0 or 1. This is
unlikely to be true, as a proportion of individuals invariably dies over
a given period. What we are asking is this proportion, not the realized
outcome for a single individual. Also, we are asking for the average of
a population (therefore unlikely average is 0 or 1 ). In general, people
assigned higher survival probabilities for greys. Some comments pointed
out no natural predators for greys as a source of that increased
survival
|
Species
|
Expert
|
Minimum Plausible
|
Most Likely
|
Maximum Plausible
|
Confidence
|
|
Grey
|
B
|
0.00
|
0.70
|
1.0
|
90
|
|
D
|
0.00
|
0.60
|
1.0
|
60
|
|
E
|
0.15
|
0.25
|
0.6
|
70
|
|
H
|
0.20
|
0.40
|
0.6
|
75
|
|
K
|
0.00
|
0.90
|
1.0
|
100
|
|
L
|
0.00
|
1.00
|
1.0
|
50
|
|
O
|
0.20
|
0.70
|
0.8
|
100
|
|
Q
|
0.30
|
0.40
|
0.5
|
60
|
|
N
|
0.00
|
6.00
|
6.0
|
100
|
|
Red
|
B
|
0.00
|
0.50
|
1.0
|
100
|
|
C
|
0.20
|
0.40
|
0.7
|
72
|
|
D
|
0.00
|
0.30
|
1.0
|
60
|
|
E
|
0.15
|
0.25
|
0.6
|
70
|
|
K
|
0.00
|
0.80
|
1.0
|
100
|
|
L
|
0.00
|
1.00
|
1.0
|
50
|
|
O
|
0.20
|
0.70
|
0.8
|
100
|
|
Q
|
0.30
|
0.40
|
0.5
|
100
|
|
I
|
1.00
|
2.00
|
3.0
|
97
|
|
N
|
0.00
|
1.00
|
3.0
|
100
|
Comments
Grey
-
H: Based on published literature that is not recent, so these
values may have changed
-
L: Again, highly speculative, if conditions are absolutely ideal,
they aren’t being culled or are going to be a casualty as a result of a
road death in theory all juveniles should survive their first winter,
however, this is highly unlikely.
-
K: No natural predators.
Red
-
E: Published literature suggest fewer than 25% of juveniles
survive first winter and reach adulthood.
-
L: This is highly speculative. If all conditions environmental,
predatory, no disease, in theory any juvenile should survive, even
though survival rates for this species through their first winter ae
generally extremely poor.
-
K: 30+ years of experience! They can thrive well naturally in the
UK - all they need is to be free of greys.
-
D: Survival until adulthood is effected by whether the juvenile
comes from a first litter or a subsequent litter in the breeding season.
Survival rates decrease for second and subsequent litters
Question A.5
What is the average probability that a given
adult squirrel (of both species) will survive a full
calendar year, under ideal conditions (i.e. in a woodland where inter-
and intra-specific competition is negligible, there is no squirrelpox
virus, no pine martens in the landscape and no lethal control being
conducted)?

Two experts expressed values above 1 (but too low to be
reasonably interpreted as a percentage), so if we remove those:

Admin annotations: Same as above for probabilities. Same
general pattern. Same concerns about average, and how “ideal” conditions
mean the individuals do not die
|
Species
|
Expert
|
Minimum Plausible
|
Most Likely
|
Maximum Plausible
|
Confidence
|
|
Grey
|
D
|
0.00
|
0.70
|
1.000
|
50
|
|
E
|
0.50
|
0.70
|
0.800
|
80
|
|
H
|
0.40
|
0.70
|
0.800
|
70
|
|
K
|
0.00
|
0.80
|
1.000
|
100
|
|
L
|
0.00
|
1.00
|
1.000
|
50
|
|
O
|
0.20
|
0.70
|
0.800
|
100
|
|
Q
|
0.30
|
0.40
|
0.500
|
50
|
|
Red
|
B
|
0.00
|
0.80
|
1.000
|
100
|
|
C
|
0.30
|
0.60
|
0.900
|
73
|
|
D
|
0.00
|
0.50
|
1.000
|
60
|
|
E
|
0.50
|
0.70
|
0.800
|
80
|
|
G
|
0.31
|
0.77
|
0.959
|
100
|
|
L
|
0.00
|
1.00
|
1.000
|
50
|
|
O
|
0.20
|
0.70
|
0.800
|
100
|
|
Q
|
0.30
|
0.50
|
0.500
|
60
|
|
K
|
0.00
|
7.00
|
1.000
|
100
|
|
N
|
0.00
|
1.00
|
3.000
|
100
|
Comments
Grey
-
H: Interpretation from published literature, but may be out of
date
-
L: As per my answer for red squirrel. If conditions are ideal in
theory the squirrel should survive, however, in reality this is unlikely
to be true. However, I believe that the grey squirrel is more likely to
survive than the red squirrel but conditions are ideal …..
-
K: Not allowing for old age.
Red
-
B: always other dangers and this is a best case scenario
-
L: As per the question for juveniles, this is highly theoretical.
If the conditions for survival are ideal, in theory the squirrel should
survive. In reality this may not be true for a variety of reasons.
-
G: These are data from spruce forests from our study see Petty et
al 2003 Biological Conservation 111 (2003) 105–114
-
K: Not allowing for old age.
Movement
Question A.6
What is the average home range size of each
species of squirrels (in hectares), under
ideal conditions (i.e. in a woodland where inter- and intra-specific
competition is negligible)?
NOTE: Remember an hectare is
equivalent to 100 m x 100 m (or 1/100th of a square
kilometer).

Admin annotations: Issues with home ranges varying widely
between states of the individuals of the population. Again, we are
looking for the realized average for the population-level (this will
define how many squirrels are in contact with a given
trap.
|
Species
|
Expert
|
Minimum Plausible
|
Most Likely
|
Maximum Plausible
|
Confidence
|
|
Grey
|
B
|
1.0
|
10
|
50
|
100
|
|
E
|
0.5
|
5
|
20
|
80
|
|
F
|
0.1
|
10
|
12
|
90
|
|
H
|
2.0
|
5
|
10
|
90
|
|
K
|
1.0
|
5
|
10
|
88
|
|
O
|
3.0
|
5
|
20
|
100
|
|
Red
|
B
|
0.0
|
10
|
50
|
93
|
|
C
|
3.0
|
4
|
7
|
69
|
|
E
|
2.0
|
7
|
20
|
90
|
|
K
|
1.0
|
2
|
10
|
91
|
|
N
|
2.0
|
7
|
23
|
100
|
|
O
|
3.0
|
8
|
20
|
100
|
|
Q
|
1.0
|
1
|
2
|
50
|
Comments
Grey
-
H: Based on short-term movement data gathered in the field and
from movement data in published literature
-
F: GPS tracking data from 29 grey squirrels in broadleaf
woodland, mid-Wales. “29 squirrels were tracked for a mean duration of
16 days (SE 0.9 days, range 5-23) and the mean number of locations per
individual was 265 (SE 17, range 82-437). Mean home range (90% KDE) was
10.4ha (SE 1.1ha) and the mean core range (50% KDE) was 2.0ha (SE
0.2ha)”
Important to note that this tracking was undertaken during a period
where pine martens had been released into the area. Conclusions of the
study were that martens may INCREASE space use by GS therefore home
ranges may be greater than normally expected. Also important to consider
when reviewing other answers is the difference between ‘home’ and ‘core’
range. Reference: McNicol 2019 (PhD thesis)/McNicol et al 2020
Translocated native pine martens Martes martes alter short‐term space
use by invasive non‐native grey squirrels Sciurus carolinensis
-
B: Same for both species, experience suggests the 10Ha figure.
-
K: This question does not take into account if the squirrel is: -
a breeding female with young - an adult male with a ‘territory’ - an
adolescent male dispersing from birth area to new territory - a young
female looking for her own breeding area
Red
-
F: Unknown - not area of expertise. Answer provided for grey
only.
-
E: Very dependant on other factors such as sex (males have larger
HRs than females), habitat type (coniferous vs deciduous vs urban),
habitat quality, etc.
-
B: This is very dependent on the geography and type of woodland.
Mixed woodland will have a smaller range than coniferous monoculture,
and squirrel density will also be relevant.
-
G: see email I sent you
-
K: This question does not take into account if the squirrel is: -
a breeding female with young - an adult male with a ‘territory’ - an
adolescent male dispersing from birth area to new territory - an young
female looking for her own breeding area
-
C: What do you mean by ideal conditions? I’m assuming typical
rather than an atypical
B. Red squirrel translocation
Post-release effects are a critical consideration in translocation
efforts, as they can significantly influence the survival and breeding
success of released squirrels. After being released into the wild,
squirrels may experience a period of acclimation during which their
survival and reproduction rates differ from those of established wild
populations. These effects may vary depending on whether the squirrels
were sourced from captivity or the wild. In this section, we seek your
expert judgment on key aspects of post-release effects.
Question B.1
How many months do you believe it will take for
released squirrels (from captive or wild sources) to become acclimated
to the release site (i.e. have survival and breeding rates expected from
the release habitat and not influenced by the translocation itself)?

Admin annotations: A recurring issue here is that the
conditions of release were underspecified. Work together to figure out
parameters for release? (Time of year and delayed/immediate/age?). In
addition, some values of absolute zero - this might be empty questions
but can be no acclimation period.
|
Source
|
Expert
|
Minimum Plausible
|
Most Likely
|
Maximum Plausible
|
Confidence
|
|
Captivity
|
A
|
3
|
14
|
24
|
65
|
|
B
|
1
|
3
|
12
|
76
|
|
C
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
64
|
|
D
|
2
|
3
|
6
|
50
|
|
E
|
2
|
5
|
8
|
60
|
|
K
|
0
|
6
|
12
|
100
|
|
O
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
100
|
|
N
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
100
|
|
Q
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
100
|
|
Wild
|
D
|
2
|
3
|
6
|
50
|
|
E
|
1
|
4
|
6
|
60
|
|
K
|
0
|
4
|
12
|
100
|
|
O
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
100
|
|
A
|
1
|
12
|
4
|
65
|
|
B
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
100
|
|
C
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
100
|
|
N
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
100
|
|
Q
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
100
|
Comments
Captivity
-
B: The difficulty in monitoring an individual makes this
guesswork and the added factor of habitat/existing populations compounds
the issue
-
K: Impossible to answer without knowing time of year for
translocation, conditions of new habitat, age of animals, sex of animal,
etc
-
C: As most are released in autumn winter they are entering the
forest at a time of potentially very low / no reproduction and in the
coming months (late winter) high natural mortality, and yet they are
supplementary fed so buffered. What Ive given is a guess to reflect
settlement and range establishment
Wild
-
K: Impossible to answer without more knowledge of time of year
for release, age and sex of animal, conditions of new habitat, etc
Question B.2
After a red squirrel is released into the wild (from captive or wild
sources), how many litters do you expect it to produce, while it is
still acclimating to its new environment?
NOTE: Take note
that this question asks for the total number of litters over the
acclimation period. This is dependent on the previous question you answered, not a fixed yearly
rate.

Admin annotations: Same as above for underspecification.
People assumed autumun release so no breeding on that period. Low
overlap of captivity and wild answers.
|
Source
|
Expert
|
Minimum Plausible
|
Most Likely
|
Maximum Plausible
|
Confidence
|
|
Captivity
|
B
|
0
|
1.0
|
2
|
76
|
|
C
|
0
|
0.1
|
1
|
60
|
|
D
|
0
|
1.0
|
1
|
50
|
|
E
|
0
|
0.0
|
1
|
60
|
|
O
|
0
|
1.0
|
2
|
100
|
|
K
|
0
|
0.0
|
0
|
100
|
|
N
|
0
|
0.0
|
0
|
100
|
|
Q
|
0
|
0.0
|
0
|
100
|
|
Wild
|
D
|
0
|
1.0
|
1
|
50
|
|
E
|
0
|
1.0
|
1
|
60
|
|
B
|
0
|
0.0
|
0
|
100
|
|
C
|
0
|
0.0
|
0
|
100
|
|
K
|
0
|
0.0
|
0
|
100
|
|
N
|
0
|
0.0
|
0
|
100
|
|
O
|
0
|
0.0
|
0
|
100
|
|
Q
|
0
|
0.0
|
0
|
100
|
Comments
Captivity
-
B: As previously, this is just guesswork and without knowing the
actual conditions it is impossible to say with any certainty.
-
K: A female would probably not breed while it is still
acclimating, a male could breed with any female it finds.
-
D: Releases normally occur in the autumn when the tree crop food
sources are highest to give best chance of survival. This will be
outside of the breeding season.
-
C: Again this reflects autumn release
Wild
-
K: A female would probably not breed while it is still
acclimating, a male could breed with any female it finds.
Question B.3
After a red squirrel is released into the wild (from captive or wild
sources), what is the probability it will survive until the next month,
while it is still acclimating to its new environment?

Admin annotations: Same as above for underspecification.
People assumed autumunal release. Lots of uniformative guesses,
reflecting underspecification. On the other hand, people did conduct
releases and show how many would die, so there is their anecdotal
information to go off from.
|
Source
|
Expert
|
Minimum Plausible
|
Most Likely
|
Maximum Plausible
|
Confidence
|
|
Captivity
|
B
|
0.0
|
0.9
|
1.0
|
81
|
|
C
|
0.3
|
0.5
|
0.8
|
61
|
|
D
|
0.0
|
0.5
|
1.0
|
100
|
|
K
|
0.0
|
0.5
|
1.0
|
100
|
|
N
|
0.0
|
1.0
|
1.0
|
100
|
|
O
|
0.0
|
0.6
|
1.0
|
100
|
|
Wild
|
B
|
0.0
|
0.6
|
1.0
|
100
|
|
D
|
0.0
|
0.5
|
1.0
|
50
|
|
K
|
0.0
|
0.5
|
1.0
|
100
|
|
O
|
0.0
|
0.7
|
1.0
|
100
|
Comments
Wild
-
B: Experience suggests that red squirrels have a social dynamic
and removal from that is an unknown quantity - this and the possibility
that the animal might stray long distances in looking for familiar
territory could make survival chances lower than a captive bred animal.
The method of release will also be relevant.
-
K: Too many variables for this to be answered.
Captivity
-
B: this will depend on many factors, including presence of avian
predators, food availability and condition of the squirrel
-
K: Too many variables for this to be answered.
D. Grey squirrel management
Management of grey squirrel populations is a crucial component in
supporting the conservation of red squirrels. Grey squirrels, being an
invasive species, have a significant negative impact on red squirrel
populations, largely due to competition for resources and the
transmission of squirrelpox. To mitigate these effects, various
management approaches are utilized, including trapping and shooting. The
effectiveness of these approaches are assessed below.
Trapping
The following traps are being evaluated on this elicitation:
-
Single-capture live traps: Cage traps designed to capture one grey
squirrel at a time without causing harm. Once trapped, the squirrel can
be humanely dispatched.
- Multi-capture live traps: Larger cage
traps capable of capturing multiple grey squirrels simultaneously, in
different subsections of the trap
- Snap traps: Lethal traps that
quickly kill grey squirrels using a spring-loaded mechanism. Designed to
ensure a swift and humane death.
Goodnature traps: Automated,
self-resetting traps powered by CO2 canisters. They humanely
kill grey squirrels upon activation and automatically reset after each
use, allowing continuous operation with minimal maintenance.
Question D.1
Given a density of 1.25 grey squirrels per hectare in a woodland,
what is the average probability that a given trap will
catch a squirrel over one day of deployment. Assume all squirrels are
within range of the trap.
NOTE: Remember an hectare is
equivalent to 100 m x 100 m (or 1/100th of a square
kilometer).

Admin annotations: Loads of variation, reflecting the many
different ways these traps can be deployed. Issue with density, explain
that this is 3/4 of mixed woodland carrying capacity. These values will
not be fixed, but adjusted for higher or lower densities. Goodnature and
snap traps deemed worse than live traps. Maybe work further to specify
what the “average” deployment looks like?
|
Trap
|
Expert
|
Minimum Plausible
|
Most Likely
|
Maximum Plausible
|
Confidence
|
|
Goodnature traps
|
B
|
0.0
|
0.20
|
1.0
|
100
|
|
C
|
0.0
|
0.05
|
0.1
|
69
|
|
F
|
0.0
|
0.01
|
0.1
|
80
|
|
H
|
0.4
|
0.60
|
0.8
|
80
|
|
K
|
0.0
|
0.20
|
0.5
|
100
|
|
Q
|
0.1
|
0.10
|
0.3
|
80
|
|
E
|
0.0
|
0.00
|
0.0
|
100
|
|
I
|
0.0
|
0.00
|
0.0
|
100
|
|
N
|
0.0
|
0.00
|
0.0
|
100
|
|
O
|
0.0
|
0.00
|
0.0
|
100
|
|
Single capture live traps
|
B
|
0.0
|
0.20
|
1.0
|
95
|
|
C
|
0.3
|
0.50
|
0.6
|
60
|
|
E
|
0.5
|
0.70
|
0.9
|
65
|
|
F
|
0.0
|
0.70
|
1.0
|
100
|
|
H
|
0.8
|
0.90
|
0.9
|
95
|
|
I
|
0.0
|
0.75
|
1.0
|
100
|
|
K
|
0.0
|
1.00
|
1.0
|
100
|
|
N
|
0.0
|
0.00
|
1.0
|
100
|
|
O
|
0.1
|
0.50
|
0.8
|
100
|
|
Q
|
0.1
|
0.10
|
0.3
|
80
|
|
Snap traps
|
B
|
0.0
|
0.20
|
1.0
|
100
|
|
C
|
0.0
|
0.30
|
0.4
|
65
|
|
F
|
0.0
|
0.30
|
1.0
|
80
|
|
K
|
0.0
|
0.50
|
1.0
|
100
|
|
Q
|
0.1
|
0.10
|
0.3
|
80
|
|
E
|
0.0
|
0.00
|
0.0
|
100
|
|
I
|
0.0
|
0.00
|
0.0
|
100
|
|
N
|
0.0
|
0.00
|
0.0
|
100
|
|
O
|
0.0
|
0.00
|
0.0
|
100
|
Comments
Goodnature traps
-
H: Based on GN trap data, however, additional data required
-
F: PRACTICAL/EXPERIENCE-BASED ANSWER Colleagues have reported
poor returns when testing good nature traps, with high levels of
by-catch - especially of wood mice and occasionally woodpeckers. They
have been broadly ineffective at trapping grey squirrels and definitely
not well targeted to the species.
-
K: Difficult to have success for most people and expensive.
Should not be used if reds of Pine Martens could be nearby.
-
C: I had a student compare single catch vs fineren box /magnum
116 trap and live catch is better.
Single capture live traps
-
H: Based on 7 years of trapping data, however, necessary to know
size of the wood and trap density to be certain
-
F: PRACTICAL/EXPERIENCE-BASED ANSWER With single-capture
traps, the probably can vary greatly based on whether pre-baiting of the
trap has been undertaken, the time of year trapping is occurring,
previous and current weather, the positioning of the trap and if the
site has been trapped previously.
If there has been 5-7 days of pre-baiting, trapping is occurring during
a period of poor natural food availability , dry weather and traps
placed at the base of trees with open ground surrounding them, the
chance of trapping a squirrel is high.
-
B: This is impossible to answer. Factors such as prebaiting, type
of bait, wariness of the squirrels, disturbance, etc are all important.
-
K: Used correctly, i.e. the right trap in the right place, any
trap will catch a grey quickly. There is no one trap better than another
and many controllers may use several. feeders, traps and/or shooting in
the same woodland. There is no single way to do this, each situation is
different and experience used with trial and error will always be
successful. No kill traps or Good Nature traps should be used when red
squirrels or Pine Martens could be in the area. There are usually many
more than 1.25 greys in a hectare of previously uncontrolled woodland!!
-
O: Many factors affect catchability, especially type of forest
and natural food availability.
-
I: We regularly trap grey squirrels in trapping sessions. Your
assumption of 1,25 grey squirrels per hectare is a gross under estimate.
Two months ago we started lethal grey control in a 4 hectare wood and
have to date removed 52 Grey Squirrels with still more grey squirrels
present. We expect to cull 100+ from that wood in a year. in another 11
Hectare wood where there has been grey control going on for 5 years we
have culled 177 grey squirrels this year to date and expect to cull 200+
by the end of this year.
Snap traps
-
F: PRACTICAL/EXPERIENCE-BASED ANSWER Similar to live capture
traps, the efficacy of snap traps is dependent on environmental factors
such as food availability, time of year, age of squirrels (i.e. are
there dispersing/naïve juveniles?). Snap traps are also depend on a
degree of pre-baiting as this will establish scent lines/regular
visitation by squirrels which can enhance first day capture rate
dramatically and possibly improve humaneness of kill as squirrels are
entering the trap fully and confidently and are therefore in the correct
position for an efficient lethal kill. However, given that grey
squirrels predominantly forage on the ground, the kill traps are
estimated to be less effective than single capture traps placed on the
ground (however can be less labour intensive for the trapper).
-
K: When located and used correctly, kill traps are very
effective. Banned in areas where the may be reds or Pine Martens, eg
Cumbria, Northumberland, Devon, Wales, and will possibly be banned in
more parts of UK.
-
Q: Presume the area hasn’t been pre-baited. When trapping I’d
pre-bait two weeks prior to activating a trap. Assume also using
attractants aniseed oil or know hazelnut oil. N.B. I’ve only ever used
live catch traps but would assume the take up to be the same though -
could be wrong
Question D.2
Given a density of 1.25 grey squirrels per hectare in a woodland, how
many squirrels will one multi-catch live trap catch over one day of
deployment. Assume all squirrels are within range of the trap.
NOTE: Remember an hectare is equivalent to 100 m x 100 m (or
1/100th of a square kilometer).

Admin annotations: Same as above. Maybe work further to
specify what the “average” deployment looks like?
|
Expert
|
Minimum Plausible
|
Most Likely
|
Maximum Plausible
|
Confidence
|
|
B
|
0
|
0.2
|
5.0
|
95
|
|
C
|
0
|
0.0
|
0.1
|
90
|
|
I
|
0
|
1.0
|
1.0
|
100
|
|
K
|
0
|
1.0
|
1.0
|
100
|
|
N
|
0
|
0.0
|
1.0
|
100
|
|
O
|
0
|
2.0
|
6.0
|
100
|
Comments
Multi-trap catch rate
-
B: Again, impossible to answer as it is dependant on numerous
factors.
-
K: Used correctly, i.e. the right trap in the right place, any
trap will catch a grey quickly. There is no one trap better than another
and many controllers may use several. feeders, traps and/or shooting in
the same woodland. There is no single way to do this, each situation is
different and experience used with trial and error will always be
successful. No kill traps or Good Nature traps should be used when red
squirrels or Pine Martens could be in the area. There are usually many
more than 1.25 greys in a hectare of previously uncontrolled woodland!!
-
I: This is an extremely low densiity of squirrels, the incidence
of multiple squirrel catches in a day with such a low density of
squirrels is very unlikely. I use both single catch and multicatch traps
and find multicatch are only beneficial when the burden of squirrels in
a wood is above 5 per hectare.
-
C: These are garbage
Shooting
The following shooting strategies are being evaluated on this
elicitation:
- Free shooting: This method involves tracking and
shooting individual grey squirrels as they are spotted in the field.
- Drey-poking: This technique targets dreys (nests) by disturbing
them, causing the squirrels to flee, making them easier to shoot.
-
Shooting over bait stations: In this approach, bait stations are used to
attract squirrels to a specific location, where they can be shot.
Question D.3
How much ground does an average shooter cover one
day’s fieldwork, in hectares?
NOTE: Remember an hectare is
equivalent to 100 m x 100 m (or 1/100th of a square
kilometer).

Admin annotations: Loads of variation, reflecting the many
different ways shooters move. Maybe work further to specify what the
“average” shooter looks like?
|
Trap
|
Expert
|
Minimum Plausible
|
Most Likely
|
Maximum Plausible
|
Confidence
|
|
Drey-poking
|
B
|
0.25
|
5.00
|
10.0
|
50
|
|
E
|
500.00
|
700.00
|
1000.0
|
55
|
|
F
|
0.00
|
100.00
|
120.0
|
60
|
|
I
|
2.00
|
3.00
|
5.0
|
100
|
|
K
|
0.00
|
30.00
|
50.0
|
100
|
|
Q
|
10.00
|
15.00
|
20.0
|
100
|
|
N
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
0.0
|
100
|
|
Free shooting
|
B
|
0.25
|
10.00
|
100.0
|
75
|
|
E
|
500.00
|
700.00
|
1000.0
|
80
|
|
F
|
20.00
|
100.00
|
120.0
|
70
|
|
H
|
5.00
|
15.00
|
25.0
|
75
|
|
I
|
2.00
|
6.00
|
10.0
|
100
|
|
K
|
0.00
|
30.00
|
50.0
|
100
|
|
N
|
0.00
|
1.00
|
1.0
|
100
|
|
Q
|
10.00
|
15.00
|
20.0
|
90
|
|
Shooting over bait-stations
|
B
|
0.10
|
0.25
|
0.5
|
74
|
|
E
|
200.00
|
500.00
|
700.0
|
55
|
|
F
|
20.00
|
200.00
|
240.0
|
70
|
|
H
|
5.00
|
15.00
|
25.0
|
100
|
|
I
|
2.00
|
10.00
|
10.0
|
100
|
|
K
|
0.00
|
30.00
|
50.0
|
100
|
|
Q
|
1.00
|
1.00
|
2.0
|
100
|
|
N
|
1.00
|
1.00
|
1.0
|
100
|
Comments
Free shooting
-
H: There are a lot of influencing factors here; size of wood,
travel time, terrain etc. Answer is based on a small number of field
trials
-
B: Impossible to answer without more information. Type of
woodland, density of cover, presence of a dog for retrieves, shotgun or
air rifle, number of grey squirrels, weather, time of year and many
other factors.
-
K: There is no such thing as an average shooter! Some people
shoot from their bathroom window, some go out at the weekend with others
for a day shooting and get 100-200greys out of several woodlands. Some
will check traps twice a day and take their guns in case they see any
greys in the trees, others will only sit and shoot at feeders.
-
I: I personally find free shooting the least successful as just
roaming around on the off chance of seeing a squirrel is largely a
matter of chance, in reality most squirrels will see you first and beat
a retreat of hide. You are also likely to be using a shotgun which has
limits due to noise if near residential populations. Shooting skyward
with any rifle is potentially dangerous.
Shooting over bait-stations
-
F: Bait station shooting is based on static points for example 4
bait stations within a 240ha site. Therefore if one assumes all
squirrels are in reach of a feeder this allows for effective site
coverage. However shooting is most effective at set times of day (early
morning, late afternoon) and effectiveness/cull rate will decline with
effort at the site.
-
B: My experience is that only one location will be used, so the
area covered is minimal.
-
K: There is no such thing as an average shooter! Some people
shoot from their bathroom window, some go out at the weekend with others
for a day shooting and get 100-200 greys out of several woodlands. Some
will check traps twice a day and take their guns in case they see any
greys in the trees, others will only sit and shoot at feeders.
-
Q: Don’t free shoot / walk up - thinks it’s a waste of time.
Though heard it works for some using thermal optics and small calibre
rifles or FAC air rifles. Shooting over bait stations from a hide @
25yds for 3-4 hours has the best results for me but don’t believe this
effective on a landscape scale given it’s time / space inefficient once
the localised grey population has been reduced. Never drey poked given
in an area of mixed populations.
-
I: In my experience shooting over feeders (bait stations) is by
far the most effective methos of controlling Grey squirrels. You are
bringing the squirrels down to a safe place to shoot them in a
controlled manner. The squirrels come to you for food, you don’t have to
roam around looking for them. If you are running multiple feeders in a
wood you can close the feeders which you are not staking out at a given
time. if you then use a live catch trap positioned near the closed
feeders the squirrels coming to those locations will then readily go
into the live catch trap for their free meal, while you stake out the
feeder you have chosen to shoot at that particular day. After shooting
greys on the designated shoot feeder for the day you can then go and
collect the squirrels from the baited traps at the other feeder
locations so that you are removing squirrels from a wide area in a
single day.
Drey-poking
-
F: With free shooting, drey poking and bait station shooting,
often the area covered is dependent on land ownership and the woodland
block that has been selected. These estimates are based on known
woodland blocks where grey squirrel control is undertaken. Normally a
single area is selected for control that day/week. Drey poking can be
undertaken all day so in theory a larger area can be covered compared to
bait station shooting and free shooting as it is less dependent on
squirrels being active and moving outside of dreys.
-
B: impossible to answer, so best guess only. Number of people
involved and degree of competency is important here.
-
K: Drey poking only to be used out of the breeding season of
birds and red squirrels which could be nesting in dreys. Must make sure
of experienced shooters who can ensure that only greys are escaping the
dreys - binoculars?
-
I: Drey poking cannot be undertaken in areas where there are Red
and Grey squirrels Drey poking cannot be undertaken in high mature
trees, it is simply not feasible to poke dreys 10+ metres high. in woods
with old mature trees dreys are often with the trunks of decaying trees
and therefor cannot be poked.
Question D.4
Given an average density of 1.25 grey squirrels per hectare in a
woodland, how many grey squirrels would a shooter dispatch in a day’s
fieldwork, on average?
NOTE: Remember an
hectare is equivalent to 100 m x 100 m (or 1/100th of a
square kilometer).

Admin annotations: Same as above. Maybe work further to
specify what the “average” shooter looks like? Also same comments
regarding density - we use a reference one that will then be
adjusted.
|
Type
|
Expert
|
Minimum Plausible
|
Most Likely
|
Maximum Plausible
|
Confidence
|
|
Drey-poking
|
F
|
0
|
2
|
8
|
60
|
|
K
|
0
|
20
|
50
|
100
|
|
Q
|
0
|
3
|
6
|
51
|
|
E
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
100
|
|
N
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
100
|
|
Free shooting
|
E
|
5
|
15
|
30
|
70
|
|
F
|
0
|
2
|
4
|
70
|
|
K
|
0
|
30
|
50
|
100
|
|
N
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
100
|
|
Q
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
100
|
|
Shooting over bait-stations
|
F
|
0
|
4
|
10
|
70
|
|
K
|
0
|
30
|
50
|
100
|
|
N
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
100
|
|
Q
|
0
|
3
|
6
|
100
|
|
E
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
100
|
Comments
Shooting over bait-stations
-
F: As with single capture traps - pre-baiting can enhance the
efficacy of bait station shooting. If the site has been supplied with
food for at least a week prior to shooting, and then possibly monitored
with trail cameras - the shooter can be confident of visitation rate and
times of grey squirrels. This can yield a high kill rate on day one.
However, due to the static nature of bait stations and territoriality of
squirrels, once the regular visitors are shot it may take some time for
new squirrels to enter the territory and find the feeder. Therefore a
number of bait stations should be rotated through to get maximum cull
rate for minimum time input.
-
K: Ditto - no such thing as average shooter. Some people can get
50 in a day, others 1 or 2. Depends how many squirrels there are!! It
takes 20% of effort to get rid of 80% greys and 80% effort to get rid of
last 20% greys in a woodland. Without consistent control, more will come
in within a few months.
-
Q: Don’t free shoot / walk up shoot and can’t drey poke given I’m
in a mixed population area. Have shot none and up to 6 from a hide over
a bait station. However numbers fluctuate according to the time of year
and levels of past control.
Free shooting
-
F: Free shooting is normally undertaken when squirrels are
most active i.e. early morning and early evening so the effort and
opportunity is not equally distributed across the day. The time of year
this is undertaken will impact number shot - this impacts visibility,
squirrel activity levels, demographic of squirrels and their
cautiousness (juveniles/mating animals etc), as well as the normal
activity levels on site - for example remote woodlands where squirrels
are ‘shy’ vs dog-walker/busy woodlands where squirrels have become
habituated to human presence.
The type of gun used i.e. shotgun versus rimfire can also impact
efficacy due to differing distance to squirrel and location of squirrel
for it to be a safe shot.
Shooting often becomes less effective throughout the session due to the
increased disturbance cased by the shooter through shots/movement
through the site.
-
E: Dependant on time of year, i.e. natural food sources, canopy
cover.
-
K: Ditto - no such thing as average shooter. Some people can get
50 in a day, others 1 or 2. Depends how many squirrels there are!! It
takes 20% of effort to get rid of 80% greys and 80% effort to get rid of
last 20% greys in a woodland. Without consistent control, more will come
in within a few months.
Drey-poking
-
F: The effectiveness of drey poking is dependent on time of year,
age and species of tree also impact how hard/easy it is to spot and poke
dreys. This is obviously not a suitable method to be used in any red
squirrel areas. Drey poking is likely to yield higher kill rates if
there are a number of shooters and this requires at least 2 individuals,
one to shoot and one to disturb dreys. Drey poking can however be
undertaken throughout the day so could yield high numbers of squirrels
if guns are accurate shots. However, shooting running squirrels can be
more challenging than other methods.
-
K: Ditto - no such thing as average shooter. Some people can get
50 in a day, others 1 or 2. Depends how many squirrels there are!! It
takes 20% of effort to get rid of 80% greys and 80% effort to get rid of
last 20% greys in a woodland. Without consistent control, more will come
in within a few months.
E. Pine marten
Pine martens are an important natural predator influencing squirrel
populations in the UK. Their presence can have differential effects on
red and grey squirrels, potentially benefiting red squirrel populations
indirectly - an effect described by Sheehy
et al, 2018 and tested in simulations by Slade
et al, 2023. In this section, we seek your expert judgment on the
role of pine martens in squirrel predation as well as life history
traits of pine martens.
Predation
Question E.1
Given an average density of 2 pine martens per km2 on a
woodland, for a given individual red or
grey squirrel living in such a woodland, what is the
average probability of it being preyed by a pine marten
over a given month?

|
Species
|
Expert
|
Minimum Plausible
|
Most Likely
|
Maximum Plausible
|
Confidence
|
|
Grey
|
E
|
0
|
0.15
|
0.2
|
65
|
|
F
|
0
|
0.10
|
0.2
|
80
|
|
K
|
0
|
0.80
|
1.0
|
100
|
|
Q
|
0
|
0.20
|
0.3
|
50
|
|
N
|
1
|
1.00
|
1.0
|
100
|
|
Red
|
E
|
0
|
0.05
|
0.2
|
65
|
|
F
|
0
|
0.05
|
0.1
|
60
|
|
K
|
0
|
0.20
|
1.0
|
100
|
|
Q
|
0
|
0.20
|
0.3
|
50
|
|
N
|
1
|
1.00
|
1.0
|
100
|
Comments
Red
-
F: Based on a 10% occurrence of grey squirrel in marten diet -
considering the lower density of red squirrels I would predict red
squirrel consumption would also be lower. However the same caveats
should be considered re: density, habitat, time of year, reproductive
status of pred and prey.
-
K: Red squirrels and pine martens have evolved together. There is
less threat for a red squirrel from a pine marten than there is from a
grey squirrel.
Grey
-
F: Predation is subject to multiple variables such as time of
year (do squirrels have young in a drey - potentially easier prey/do
female martens have young - squirrel may provide good food source for
kits), natural food availability, other prey items in habitat,
age/experience of marten, weather conditions. Density of squirrels (and
habitat) will also play a role and therefore red squirrel predation is
likely to be lower than greys. Broadleaf habitat will have higher
densities of greys, red squirrel densities are generally lower but
particularly in broadleaf woodland. Coniferous woodland will have
relatively low densities of greys. These all impact predation rate.
EVIDENCE SOURCE: Dietary studies suggest grey squirrels (in non-red
area) comprised 10% of marten diet based on hard part analysis of scat -
McNicol 2019 PhD Thesis. This is not drastically different from Sheehy
studies in different areas ~14% FO in marten diet.
-
K: Evidence from N Ireland and other areas that as PM populations
expand, grey populations decline with reports of numerous grey remains
in feeding sites. PMs are ‘lazy’ and like to take easy prey. - reds are
not ‘easy.’
-
Q: Believe Pine Marten population needs to be up to 3 / km sq to
imapact grey squirrels.
Life History
Question E.2
Under current conditions, what is the average
length, in months, of the pine marten breeding season
(i.e. the window during the year when the species engages in
reproductive activities, including mating, gestation, and giving birth
to offspring)?

|
Expert
|
Minimum Plausible
|
Most Likely
|
Maximum Plausible
|
Confidence
|
|
D
|
8
|
9
|
11
|
70
|
|
E
|
2
|
2
|
3
|
75
|
|
F
|
6
|
8
|
10
|
90
|
|
L
|
10
|
11
|
11
|
85
|
|
O
|
7
|
8
|
10
|
100
|
|
N
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
100
|
Comments
Breeding Season
-
F: Due to mating occurring in summer followed by delayed
implantation, this period can be quite long subject to weather
conditions and resource availability. For example if martens experience
good summer conditions and mate early eg June/July, then experience
favourable autumn and winter conditions, females may give birth as early
as Jan/Feb - as seen in SW England and occasionally in mid-Wales.
However if adverse conditions are experienced over autumn/winter (and as
has been reported further north) kits may not be born until March/April.
This is more common in N Scotland.
-
L: Mating takes place Jun-July but then there is delayed
implantation with births not happening until the following April.
-
D: Pine martens have delayed implantation of blastocyst.
Question E.3
How many litters do you expect an average female
pine marten to have per year, under ideal conditions (i.e. in a woodland
where inter- and intra-specific competition is negligible)?

|
Expert
|
Minimum Plausible
|
Most Likely
|
Maximum Plausible
|
Confidence
|
|
D
|
0
|
1.0
|
1
|
70
|
|
E
|
0
|
1.0
|
1
|
90
|
|
F
|
0
|
0.5
|
1
|
100
|
|
K
|
0
|
1.0
|
2
|
86
|
|
L
|
0
|
1.0
|
1
|
70
|
|
Q
|
0
|
1.0
|
1
|
75
|
|
N
|
1
|
1.0
|
1
|
100
|
|
O
|
1
|
1.0
|
1
|
100
|
Comments
No of Litters
-
F: Experience from monitoring release pine martens suggests not
all females produce a litter each year. No females were recorded to have
produced more than one litter in a single year so the max is estimated
to be 1 in ‘average’ broadleaf/mixed woodland.
-
L: The most likely value I’ve given of one litter per year,
however, females won’t start to breed until their second year and
animals that have been introduced to an area are likely to start to
breed later.
Question E.4
How many individuals do you expect to survive after weaning from a
single litter produced by an average female pine
marten, under ideal conditions (i.e., in a woodland where inter- and
intra-specific competition is negligible)?

|
Expert
|
Minimum Plausible
|
Most Likely
|
Maximum Plausible
|
Confidence
|
|
D
|
0
|
2.0
|
4
|
60
|
|
E
|
1
|
3.0
|
5
|
70
|
|
F
|
0
|
2.0
|
4
|
90
|
|
K
|
0
|
1.5
|
2
|
100
|
|
L
|
0
|
1.0
|
6
|
70
|
|
O
|
1
|
2.0
|
4
|
100
|
|
N
|
1
|
1.0
|
1
|
100
|
Comments
Surviving kits/litter
-
F: From experience monitoring release pine martens, most females
produced 3-4 kits. Rarely were all kits found to survive to independence
- through camera trap monitoring of den sites where possible and bait
stations near den sites/in the females territory. Most females were
observed with 1-2 juveniles out of the den site in the year following
birth. We never observed a female with 3+ kits outside of the den when
juveniles were more mobile.
-
L: A female could have up to six kits, this is highly unlikely,
much more likely to be around two-four, generally three. With perhaps
1-2 surviving their first winter.
-
K: Number provided by ‘experts’
Question E.5
What is the average probability that a given pine
marten (either a juvenile or adult) will survive a full calendar year,
under ideal conditions (i.e. in a woodland where inter- and
intra-specific competition is negligible)?

|
Age
|
Expert
|
Minimum Plausible
|
Most Likely
|
Maximum Plausible
|
Confidence
|
|
Adult
|
D
|
0.0
|
0.80
|
1.0
|
70
|
|
E
|
0.2
|
0.50
|
0.8
|
65
|
|
F
|
0.5
|
0.85
|
1.0
|
85
|
|
K
|
0.0
|
0.90
|
1.0
|
90
|
|
L
|
0.0
|
1.00
|
1.0
|
50
|
|
N
|
1.0
|
1.00
|
1.0
|
100
|
|
Juvenile
|
D
|
0.0
|
0.60
|
1.0
|
55
|
|
F
|
0.0
|
0.45
|
1.0
|
80
|
|
L
|
0.0
|
1.00
|
1.0
|
50
|
|
N
|
1.0
|
1.00
|
1.0
|
100
|
Comments
Juvenile
-
F: Based on a small number of translocated martens and known
breeding sites. Most females had 2-4 kits, with most females
successfully raising 1-2 kits to 1 year. However as kits were not
tracked, their fate after dispersing was unknown unless they took up a
territory being monitored with trail cameras and could be identified
through bib pattern. Therefore lower confidence in this estimate.
-
L: I don’t believe this is likely even under optimal conditions.
Juvenile survival rate is quite poor for this species.
Adult
-
F: Based on released adult pine martens (radio tracked) in
Wales/Forest of Dean. Survival rate was generally high and competition
was very low. Around 80-90%.
-
L: This is of course assuming all conditions are absolutely fine,
in theory an adult should survive but it is not likely to be the case.
As with my answers for both squirrels on this I am a bit dubious about
them.
-
K: Not allowing for old age.
Training question
The question below is a training question to familiarise you with the
survey interface. Make sure to play around with the values so you get a
sense of how your answers shape the outcome.
What is the probability that, when dropping a piece of toast, said
toast will land on the floor with the spread side down, given the
following spreads:
- Butter
- Jam

|
Spread
|
Expert
|
Minimum Plausible
|
Most Likely
|
Maximum Plausible
|
Confidence
|
|
Butter
|
B
|
0.0
|
0.5
|
1.0
|
100
|
|
C
|
0.0
|
0.5
|
1.0
|
100
|
|
D
|
0.1
|
0.8
|
0.9
|
80
|
|
E
|
0.5
|
0.7
|
1.0
|
95
|
|
I
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
1.0
|
51
|
|
J
|
0.0
|
0.5
|
1.0
|
94
|
|
M
|
0.0
|
0.5
|
1.0
|
66
|
|
N
|
0.0
|
1.0
|
1.0
|
100
|
|
O
|
0.0
|
1.0
|
1.0
|
100
|
|
Q
|
0.1
|
0.3
|
0.6
|
100
|
|
Jam
|
B
|
0.0
|
0.5
|
1.0
|
100
|
|
E
|
0.6
|
0.9
|
1.0
|
95
|
Comments