Liver Tissue Characterization in Competitive Student Athletes by Quantitative MRI: Normal Values

Author

Lu Mao

Statistical analysis

A placeholder for description of statistical methods.

Patient characteristics

Summary statistics for patient demographics and mean values of PDFF, R2*, T1, T2, and LIC are provided by sex and field strength in Table 1 and Table 2, respectively.

Table 1:

Subject characteristics and measurements by sex.

Characteristic Female, N = 491 Male, N = 891 Overall, N = 1381 p-value2
Age (years) 19.0 (18.6, 20.0) 19.0 (19.0, 21.0) 19.0 (18.9, 20.9) 0.13
AthleteType



    Basketball 2 (4.1%) 0 (0%) 2 (1.4%)
    Cross country 0 (0%) 2 (2.2%) 2 (1.4%)
    Diver 1 (2.0%) 0 (0%) 1 (0.7%)
    Football 0 (0%) 50 (56%) 50 (36%)
    Hockey 1 (2.0%) 0 (0%) 1 (0.7%)
    Ice Hockey 9 (18%) 8 (9.0%) 17 (12%)
    Rower 15 (31%) 8 (9.0%) 23 (17%)
    Soccer 4 (8.2%) 4 (4.5%) 8 (5.8%)
    Softball 5 (10%) 0 (0%) 5 (3.6%)
    Swimmer 0 (0%) 1 (1.1%) 1 (0.7%)
    Tennis 1 (2.0%) 1 (1.1%) 2 (1.4%)
    Track_endurance 1 (2.0%) 2 (2.2%) 3 (2.2%)
    Track_power 5 (10%) 7 (7.9%) 12 (8.7%)
    Volleyball 5 (10%) 0 (0%) 5 (3.6%)
    Wrestler 0 (0%) 6 (6.7%) 6 (4.3%)
Height (cm) 172.7 (165.0, 178.3) 188.0 (183.0, 193.0) 183.0 (175.0, 189.0) <0.001
Weight (kg) 71.0 (65.8, 77.0) 93.0 (81.2, 109.0) 82.0 (71.1, 102.8) <0.001
BMI 23.8 (22.1, 25.1) 26.6 (24.2, 30.8) 25.3 (22.9, 28.8) <0.001
Field strength


0.4
    1.5T 23 (47%) 49 (55%) 72 (52%)
    3T 26 (53%) 40 (45%) 66 (48%)
PDFF 1.8 (1.6, 2.3) 2.1 (1.8, 2.8) 2.0 (1.7, 2.6) 0.027
R2s 36.0 (32.2, 41.5) 37.7 (32.7, 44.0) 36.8 (32.6, 43.2) 0.2
T1 667.3 (593.5, 753.1) 583.9 (544.3, 644.4) 602.6 (557.5, 693.7) <0.001
T2 49.8 (45.2, 53.1) 46.6 (44.0, 50.5) 47.1 (44.3, 51.2) 0.021
LIC 0.590 (0.512, 0.678) 0.644 (0.572, 0.730) 0.633 (0.554, 0.718) 0.007
1 Median (IQR); n (%)
2 Wilcoxon rank sum test; Pearson’s Chi-squared test
Table 2:

Subject characteristics and measurements by field strength.

Characteristic 1.5T, N = 721 3T, N = 661 Overall, N = 1381 p-value2
Sex


0.4
    Female 23 (32%) 26 (39%) 49 (36%)
    Male 49 (68%) 40 (61%) 89 (64%)
Age (years) 19.0 (18.9, 20.8) 19.0 (18.9, 20.9) 19.0 (18.9, 20.9) 0.7
AthleteType


0.026
    Basketball 1 (1.4%) 1 (1.5%) 2 (1.4%)
    Cross country 1 (1.4%) 1 (1.5%) 2 (1.4%)
    Diver 0 (0%) 1 (1.5%) 1 (0.7%)
    Football 35 (49%) 15 (23%) 50 (36%)
    Hockey 1 (1.4%) 0 (0%) 1 (0.7%)
    Ice Hockey 8 (11%) 9 (14%) 17 (12%)
    Rower 13 (18%) 10 (15%) 23 (17%)
    Soccer 3 (4.2%) 5 (7.6%) 8 (5.8%)
    Softball 2 (2.8%) 3 (4.5%) 5 (3.6%)
    Swimmer 0 (0%) 1 (1.5%) 1 (0.7%)
    Tennis 2 (2.8%) 0 (0%) 2 (1.4%)
    Track_endurance 0 (0%) 3 (4.5%) 3 (2.2%)
    Track_power 3 (4.2%) 9 (14%) 12 (8.7%)
    Volleyball 2 (2.8%) 3 (4.5%) 5 (3.6%)
    Wrestler 1 (1.4%) 5 (7.6%) 6 (4.3%)
Height (cm) 188.0 (178.2, 195.2) 180.0 (172.2, 185.0) 183.0 (175.0, 189.0) <0.001
Weight (kg) 92.5 (73.7, 110.0) 78.1 (68.4, 86.1) 82.0 (71.1, 102.8) <0.001
BMI 26.5 (23.7, 30.9) 24.3 (22.5, 26.6) 25.3 (22.9, 28.8) <0.001
PDFF 2.3 (1.9, 2.8) 1.7 (1.5, 2.2) 2.0 (1.7, 2.6) <0.001
R2s 32.7 (30.8, 35.5) 43.2 (40.8, 47.4) 36.8 (32.6, 43.2) <0.001
T1 585.6 (557.4, 615.2) 695.7 (576.4, 749.2) 602.6 (557.5, 693.7) <0.001
T2 47.3 (44.6, 50.4) 46.5 (44.0, 52.8) 47.1 (44.3, 51.2) 0.9
LIC 0.692 (0.642, 0.764) 0.552 (0.521, 0.610) 0.633 (0.554, 0.718) <0.001
1 n (%); Median (IQR)
2 Pearson’s Chi-squared test; Wilcoxon rank sum test; Fisher’s exact test

BMI

Table 3:

Comparison of BMT by field strength within each sex.

Characteristic Female Male
1.5T, N = 231 3T, N = 261 p-value2 1.5T, N = 491 3T, N = 401 p-value2
BMI 23.19 (22.01, 25.20) 23.84 (22.49, 24.89) 0.9 29.3 (25.7, 33.7) 25.1 (22.7, 27.1) <0.001
1 Median (IQR)
2 Wilcoxon rank sum exact test

Comparison of markers by gender and field strength

Normal values (Mean \(\pm\) 2SD) of PDFF, R2*, T1, T2, and LIC are summarized overall and by sex and field strength in Table 4 and shown graphically in Figure 1.

Table 4:

Normal values by sex and field strength.

Female Male Overall
1.5T, N = 231 3T, N = 261 Overall, N = 491 1.5T, N = 491 3T, N = 401 Overall, N = 891 1.5T, N = 721 3T, N = 661 Overall, N = 1381
PDFF 2.5±1.2 [0.2, 4.8] 2.2±2.1 [-2.0, 6.4] 2.4±1.7 [-1.1, 5.8] 3.2±2.4 [-1.5, 7.9] 2.2±1.1 [-0.1, 4.4] 2.7±2.0 [-1.2, 6.6] 3.0±2.1 [-1.2, 7.1] 2.2±1.6 [-0.9, 5.3] 2.6±1.9 [-1.2, 6.3]
R2s 32±4 [25, 39] 43±8 [26, 60] 38±9 [20, 55] 36±15 [6, 66] 46±8 [31, 62] 41±13 [14, 67] 35±13 [9, 60] 45±8 [29, 61] 40±12 [16, 63]
T1 604±49 [505, 703] 769±89 [590, 947] 691±110 [471, 912] 578±48 [482, 674] 615±99 [417, 814] 595±77 [440, 749] 586±50 [487, 686] 676±121 [434, 918] 629±101 [427, 831]
T2 50.5±4.6 [41.4, 59.6] 48.2±6.6 [34.9, 61.4] 49.3±5.8 [37.7, 60.9] 46.2±4.0 [38.3, 54.2] 48.2±7.6 [33.0, 63.3] 47.1±5.9 [35.3, 59.0] 47.6±4.6 [38.4, 56.8] 48.2±7.2 [33.9, 62.5] 47.9±6.0 [36.0, 59.8]
LIC 0.67±0.09 [0.48, 0.86] 0.55±0.11 [0.32, 0.77] 0.60±0.12 [0.37, 0.84] 0.78±0.39 [-0.01, 1.57] 0.59±0.10 [0.38, 0.80] 0.69±0.31 [0.07, 1.32] 0.74±0.33 [0.08, 1.41] 0.58±0.11 [0.36, 0.79] 0.66±0.26 [0.13, 1.19]
1 Mean±SD [mean-2SD, mean+2SD]

Figure 1: Normal values (mean +- 2SD) by sex and field strength.

Note: There is an extreme outlier of Yca_074 with LIC = 3.39.

P-values comparing the normal values between sexes and fields strengths are tabulated in Table 5 and Table 6.

Table 5: P-values of t-test comparing 1.5T vs 3T by sex.
Female Male Overall
PDFF 0.484 0.010 0.013
R2s <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
T1 <0.001 0.034 <0.001
T2 0.149 0.147 0.582
LIC <0.001 0.003 <0.001
Table 6: P-values of t-test comparing female vs male by field strength.
1.5T 3T Overall
PDFF 0.132 0.946 0.264
R2s 0.073 0.120 0.129
T1 0.042 <0.001 <0.001
T2 <0.001 0.988 0.041
LIC 0.073 0.120 0.018

BMI correlations

Figure 2 plots PDFF, R2*, T1, T2, and LIC against BMI.

  • PDFF positively correlated with BMI for both 1.5T and 3T;
  • T1 negatively correlated with BMI for 3T only;
  • No correlation of R2* or LIC with BMI;
  • Can fit a regression line for 1.5/3T combined if desirable.

Figure 2: Measurements as a function of BMI.

By athletic group

Normal values (Mean \(\pm\) 2SD) of PDFF, R2*, T1, T2, and LIC are plotted in Figure 3 by sport. The size of the mean dot is proportional to the group size for the sport.

Figure 3: Normal values (mean +- 2SD) by sport.

Grouping of sports are considered below.

Type Sports
Power sport Diver, Track_power, Wrestler
Mixed sport Basketball, Football, Hockey, Ice Hockey, Soccer, Softball, Tennis, Volleyball
Endurance sport Cross country, Rower, Swimmer, Track_endurance

Number of subjects in each sex, field strength and sport type combination:

Type Total
Power sport Mixed sport Endurance sport
strata



    Female-1.5T 1 14 8 23
    Female-3T 5 13 8 26
    Male-1.5T 3 40 6 49
    Male-3T 10 23 7 40
Total 19 90 29 138
Table 7: Comparison of normal values between grouped sports by sex and field strength.
Strata Power sport Mixed sport Endurance sport
PDFF Female-1.5T 3.66±0 [3.66, 3.66] 2.42±1.02 [0.38, 4.47] 2.6±1.42 [-0.24, 5.43]
Female-3T 4.39±4.41 [-4.43, 13.22] 1.62±0.35 [0.92, 2.32] 1.77±0.48 [0.8, 2.73]
Male-1.5T 1.87±0.64 [0.59, 3.15] 3.4±2.55 [-1.69, 8.49] 2.24±0.44 [1.36, 3.12]
Male-3T 1.81±1.37 [-0.93, 4.54] 2.24±0.93 [0.37, 4.11] 2.45±1.3 [-0.16, 5.05]
R2s Female-1.5T 29.26±0 [29.26, 29.26] 31.1±3.44 [24.21, 37.98] 33.34±3.76 [25.82, 40.86]
Female-3T 56.23±9.59 [37.06, 75.41] 39.3±4.18 [30.94, 47.66] 40.4±3.26 [33.89, 46.92]
Male-1.5T 66.55±60.33 [-54.1, 187.2] 34.15±4.2 [25.74, 42.55] 32.97±3.54 [25.9, 40.04]
Male-3T 43.74±4.04 [35.66, 51.82] 47.77±9.6 [28.57, 66.97] 44.2±2.3 [39.6, 48.81]
T1 Female-1.5T 589.15±0 [589.15, 589.15] 612.99±55.07 [502.85, 723.12] 590.2±40.39 [509.43, 670.97]
Female-3T 726.5±110.87 [504.76, 948.25] 794.13±97.17 [599.78, 988.47] 753.21±49.31 [654.59, 851.82]
Male-1.5T 535.45±115.72 [304.02, 766.88] 579.41±42.92 [493.57, 665.25] 590.09±33.09 [523.92, 656.27]
Male-3T 647.08±87.9 [471.28, 822.89] 593.89±106.2 [381.49, 806.29] 640.29±82.69 [474.92, 805.67]
T2 Female-1.5T 52.99±0 [52.99, 52.99] 50.7±4.4 [41.91, 59.49] 49.89±5.28 [39.34, 60.44]
Female-3T 43.84±7.91 [28.01, 59.67] 49.89±5.11 [39.67, 60.11] 48.04±7.54 [32.96, 63.13]
Male-1.5T 43.11±7.92 [27.27, 58.95] 46.26±3.51 [39.23, 53.29] 47.65±4.8 [38.06, 57.24]
Male-3T 44.01±5.56 [32.89, 55.14] 48.61±8.08 [32.46, 64.77] 52.74±5.81 [41.12, 64.37]
LIC Female-1.5T 0.6±0 [0.6, 0.6] 0.65±0.09 [0.47, 0.83] 0.71±0.1 [0.51, 0.9]
Female-3T 0.73±0.13 [0.47, 0.99] 0.5±0.06 [0.39, 0.61] 0.52±0.04 [0.43, 0.6]
Male-1.5T 1.57±1.57 [-1.57, 4.71] 0.73±0.11 [0.51, 0.95] 0.7±0.09 [0.51, 0.88]
Male-3T 0.56±0.05 [0.45, 0.67] 0.61±0.13 [0.36, 0.87] 0.57±0.03 [0.5, 0.63]

Figure 4: Normal values (mean +- 2SD) by grouped sports, sex and field strength.

Footballers alone

Normal values (Mean \(\pm\) 2SD) of PDFF, R2*, T1, T2, and LIC for football playes are summarized overall and by field strength in Table 8.

Table 8:

Normal values by field strength for football players.

1.5T, N = 351 3T, N = 151 Overall, N = 501 p-value2
PDFF 3.6±2.7 [-1.7, 8.9] 2.3±1.0 [0.2, 4.4] 3.2±2.4 [-1.5, 7.9] 0.018
R2s 34±4 [25, 43] 50±11 [28, 71] 39±10 [19, 59] <0.001
T1 585±42 [502, 669] 592±110 [372, 811] 587±68 [451, 723] 0.8
T2 46.6±3.5 [39.7, 53.6] 46.4±6.2 [34.0, 58.8] 46.6±4.4 [37.8, 55.4] >0.9
LIC 0.72±0.11 [0.50, 0.95] 0.64±0.15 [0.35, 0.93] 0.70±0.13 [0.44, 0.95] 0.068
1 Mean±SD [mean-2SD, mean+2SD]
2 Welch Two Sample t-test