Load Packages

library(readxl) # Import excel files
library(Hmisc) # Correlation Function
## Warning: package 'Hmisc' was built under R version 4.4.2
## 
## Attaching package: 'Hmisc'
## The following objects are masked from 'package:base':
## 
##     format.pval, units
library(pscl) # Pseudo R-Square package to evaluate our model with McFadden R Square
## Warning: package 'pscl' was built under R version 4.4.2
## Classes and Methods for R originally developed in the
## Political Science Computational Laboratory
## Department of Political Science
## Stanford University (2002-2015),
## by and under the direction of Simon Jackman.
## hurdle and zeroinfl functions by Achim Zeileis.
library(pROC) 
## Warning: package 'pROC' was built under R version 4.4.2
## Type 'citation("pROC")' for a citation.
## 
## Attaching package: 'pROC'
## The following objects are masked from 'package:stats':
## 
##     cov, smooth, var

Load and Clean the Data

data <- read_excel("C:/Users/nikol/Downloads/Class Exercise 15_TireRatings.xlsx")
data_df <- subset(data, select = -c(Tire)) # Drop Irrelevant Column

Summarize the Data

head(data_df)
## # A tibble: 6 × 4
##     Wet Noise Buy_Again Purchase
##   <dbl> <dbl>     <dbl>    <dbl>
## 1   8     7.2       6.1        0
## 2   8     7.2       6.6        1
## 3   7.6   7.5       6.9        1
## 4   6.6   5.4       6.6        0
## 5   5.8   6.3       4          0
## 6   6.3   5.7       4.5        0
summary(data_df)
##       Wet            Noise         Buy_Again        Purchase     
##  Min.   :4.300   Min.   :3.600   Min.   :1.400   Min.   :0.0000  
##  1st Qu.:6.450   1st Qu.:6.000   1st Qu.:3.850   1st Qu.:0.0000  
##  Median :7.750   Median :7.100   Median :6.150   Median :0.0000  
##  Mean   :7.315   Mean   :6.903   Mean   :5.657   Mean   :0.4412  
##  3rd Qu.:8.225   3rd Qu.:7.925   3rd Qu.:7.400   3rd Qu.:1.0000  
##  Max.   :9.200   Max.   :8.900   Max.   :8.900   Max.   :1.0000
Data Description: Description of the features presented in the table below:
Variable     | Definition
------------ | ------------
1. Purchase  | Our dependent variable, a 1 indicates that the respondent would probably or definetely buy the tire again.
2. Buy-Again | The average of the buy-again responses.
3. Noise     | The average ratings for the noise level generated by each tire.
4. Wet       | The average ratings for each tire's wet traction performance.

Logit Model

model <- glm(Purchase ~ Wet + Noise, family = binomial, data = data_df) # We are only using independent variables Wet and Noise as that is what the question specified.
summary(model)
## 
## Call:
## glm(formula = Purchase ~ Wet + Noise, family = binomial, data = data_df)
## 
## Coefficients:
##             Estimate Std. Error z value Pr(>|z|)   
## (Intercept) -39.4982    12.4779  -3.165  0.00155 **
## Wet           3.3745     1.2641   2.670  0.00760 **
## Noise         1.8163     0.8312   2.185  0.02887 * 
## ---
## Signif. codes:  0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
## 
## (Dispersion parameter for binomial family taken to be 1)
## 
##     Null deviance: 93.325  on 67  degrees of freedom
## Residual deviance: 27.530  on 65  degrees of freedom
## AIC: 33.53
## 
## Number of Fisher Scoring iterations: 8
Interpretation: All the independent variables were significant (p-value < 0.05)

Test for McFadden Significance (Pseudo R-Squared)

pR2(model)# McFadden = 0.71
## fitting null model for pseudo-r2
##         llh     llhNull          G2    McFadden        r2ML        r2CU 
## -13.7649516 -46.6623284  65.7947536   0.7050093   0.6199946   0.8305269
Interpretation: Since our McFadden value is not between 0.2 and 0.4, we cannot conclude that our model is significant.

Estimating with our Model

new_data1 <- data.frame(Wet = 8, Noise = 8, Purchase = 1)
new_data2 <- data.frame(Wet = 7, Noise = 7,  Purchase = 1)

prob1 <- predict(model, newdata = new_data1, type = "response") # Output: 88.37%
prob2 <- predict(model, newdata = new_data2, type = "response") # Output: 4.06%
Interpretation: When the Wet and Noise performance ratings are both 8, the probability that a customer will probably or definetely purchase a tire again is 88.37%. When the Wet and Noise performance ratings are both 7, the probability that a customer will probably or definetely purchase a tire again is 4.07%.