Main research questions
What is the impact of transfer self-efficacy on goal orientation among community college students?
Does the impact vary by transfer self-efficacy component?
Economic Inquiry in Education (EDU-633-001)
2024-11-11
Contextual overview
The problem
Conceptual models
Research methods
Conclusions
Applications (So what?)
Population: 337,331,280.
Around 19.3 million students (undergraduate and postgraduate) are enrolled in 3,896 higher education institutions (2-year and 4-year) (NCES projection).
Only 25 (0.6%) universities have more than 45 thousand students enrolled (Best Colleges, March 2024).
From 2018 to 2021, the proportion of HS graduates who enrolled decreased by 7%, or 480,258 (table 302.10). In Fall 2024, enrollment declined by 6% (NSC, October 2024).
The percentage of HS graduates enrolling in community colleges declined at higher pace next to the national trend (9%) from 2018 to 2022.
The proportion of community college graduates who transferred decreased by about 8% between 2021 and 2022 (National Student Clearinghouse (NSC), March, 2023).
In Spring 2024, NSC reported recovery of fall 2023 transfer rates by 5% next to fall 2022.
Is transfer efficacy among community college students composed of four unique, but interrelated sub-constructs(namely, mastery experiences, social persuasion, vicarious experiences, & reduction of stress).
What constitutes goal orientation towards transferring among community college students?
What is the impact of each component of transfer self-efficacy on goal orientation among community college students?
Social Cognitive Theory (Bandura, 1989), and Self-Efficacy Theory (Bandura, 1994)
Goal Orientation Theory (Locke & Latham,2002)
Transfer Efficacy Model (TEM) (Buenaflor, 2021)
Goal orientation is a social-cognitive theory that examines the relationship between people and their goals (Locke & Latham, 1990).
The main premise of goal orientation is that individuals who pursue clear and difficult goals tend to perform better.
Data collection consisted of two phases
Phase 1: Dealt with survey development aimed at capturing content valid items for the five core component of the TEM model
Focus groups with three transfer students assessed the content validity of the items based on the psychology of survey response theory (Tourangeau et al.,2000)
Accordingly participants were asked to examine each item, recall critical experiences, and provide examples
A short definition of the 5 constructs was made available to assist recalling process
Survey collection took place during spring 2022 using Qualtrics
Relied on on professional listservs to circulate the survey (e.g., NACADA) as well as Phi Theta Kappa to administer the survey among their partner organizations.
Students were entered into a raffle for an Apple iPad as an incentive
1,810 respondents completed the survey
Sources of self-efficacy: Instead of being grouped into four factors (as hypothesized), the self-efficacy items were grouped into five factors: Altogether, they explained 53% of the variance in the correlation matrix
Goal orientation: Four indicators were grouped into a single factor. This factor accounts for almost 60% of the variance in the correlation. An indicator was removed.
What is the impact of transfer self-efficacy on goal orientation among community college students?
Does the impact vary by transfer self-efficacy component?
Goal orientation towards transfer rests on having an academic plan, being proactive in securing academic skills, having decided on the major to pursue, and seen oneself attending college.
Goal orientation is influenced by empowering experiences at community colleges. Those experiences include having friends who have successfully transferred, engaging with supportive college personnel who affirm students’ potential to transfer, and understanding institutional transfer agreements that outline clear policies and the necessary steps to achieve them.
From the perspective of the president of a community college who is committed at increasing the proportion of her students to eventually transfer to a four-year institution.
From the perspective of the president of a university who is committed at increasing the enrollment of community college graduates, and their success at her institution.
In framing your answer, make certain that you are drawing on the key inputs and outputs that will help advance the financial well-being of the community college.
On October 31, 2023, the California legislature enacted a new law to facilitate the process of transferring community college students to UCLA and other universities in the California higher education system.
The U.S. Department of Education published a list of community colleges and universities that stand out in facilitating transfer and success in college for community college graduates.
Bandura, A (1988). Organizational Application of Social Cognitive Theory. Australian Journal of Management, 13(2): pp. 275 - 302.
Bandura, A. (1994). Self-efficacy. In V.S. Ramachandran. Encyclopedia of Human Behavior, 4, 71-81.
Buenaflor, S. H. & Cabrera, A. F. (2023). Transfer efficacy and goal orientation among potential transfer students: An exploratory study. Paper presented before the annual meeting of the National Institute for the Study of Transfer Students (NISTS). Portland, Oregon.
Buenaflor, S.H. (2021). Transfer student self-efficacy: A success-oriented narrative of the transfer student experience. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/10668926.2021.1967226.
Locke, E. A. & Latham, G. P. (1990). A theory of goal setting and task performance. Prentice Hall.References.
National Student Clearinghouse (March 25, 2024). Community College Enrollment & Other Mobility Trends in Fall 2023.
National Student Clearinghouse (March 9, 2023). Transfers from Community Colleges to Four-Year Colleges Drop Nearly 8% from Fall 2021 to Fall 2022.
Tourangeau, R., Rips, L. J. & Rainski (2000).The psychology of survey response, Cambridge University Press.
Velasco, et al. (2024). Tracking transfer. College Research Center. Teachers College. Columbia University.
Sources of background images:
Personal photos
Social Cognitive Theory (SCT)
SCT postulates that contextual influences can affect a person’s belief on her ability to engage in behaviors that lead to specific outcomes. Bandura (1994) postulates there are four contextual influences:
Vicarious experiences (e.g., seeing other succeeding in the task).
Social persuasion (e.g., receiving positive feedback from people whose opinion one values).
Reduction of stress (e.g., eliminating barriers to succeed in the task).
Mastery experiences (e.g., becoming an expert).