Clean data: calculating sdi, ias, and risk indices

#Figure 1 - alternative - no, yes, nr positions for dg_decision only across treatments

Preraing figure for dg decisions

Same thing for beliefs

Figure 2 - beliefs about transfers of others

Same thing for proportions

Figure 3 - proportions

[1] 20

[1] 20

merging three figures together

APPENDIX Figure for dg decisions - STRONG

Table 1

Regression table for those whose position was shown to a dictator. OLS reported with heteroskedasticity-consistent (HC2) robust standard errors (MacKinnon and White 1985)

MacKinnon, J. G., & White, H. (1985). “Some heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimators with improved finite sample properties.” Journal of Econometrics, 29(3), 305-325.

# A tibble: 1 × 6
  mean_dg_decision_no mean_dg_decision_yes ci_low_no ci_low_yes ci_up_no
                <dbl>                <dbl>     <dbl>      <dbl>    <dbl>
1               -12.5                 2.15     -16.1     -0.827    -8.90
# ℹ 1 more variable: ci_up_yes <dbl>

	Dependent variable
	DG Decision	Average Belief	Estimate of war supporters
(Intercept)	−23.650**	−17.798*	49.130***
	(7.652)	(8.571)	(5.320)
Revealed by Dictator	−2.945	−4.880	−4.391
	(4.601)	(4.773)	(2.678)
Revealed by Recipient	−0.174	−3.103	−3.308
	(4.380)	(4.886)	(2.875)
Partner with Anti-War Position	13.897***	3.232	8.230***
	(4.186)	(4.638)	(2.297)
Position Intensity	0.694	−2.335	4.354*
	(2.785)	(2.879)	(1.813)
Risk Index	0.282	0.891	1.024**
	(0.580)	(0.586)	(0.355)
SDI Anti-War Index	1.022	0.477	−2.713***
	(1.123)	(1.179)	(0.709)
SDI Pro-War Index	−0.956	−0.066	−0.488
	(1.893)	(1.704)	(0.955)
IAS Index	1.280	0.541	3.895
	(3.709)	(4.053)	(2.611)
Revealed by Dictator X Partner Anti-War	2.056	5.638	1.627
	(6.153)	(6.262)	(3.413)
Revealed by Recipient X Partner Anti-War	0.315	7.684	0.496
	(5.672)	(6.243)	(3.679)
Num. Obs.	575	575	575
Adj. R-squared	0.053	0.006	0.129
Socio-demographic Controls	YES	YES	YES
* p < 0.05, p < 0.01, * p < 0.001

Table 2

separate for those who did not reveal. OLS reported with heteroskedasticity-consistent (HC2) robust standard errors (MacKinnon and White 1985)

	Dependent variable
	DG Decision	Average Belief	Estimate of war supporters
(Intercept)	−5.483	−14.377	61.219***
	(9.237)	(10.270)	(5.718)
Revealed by Dictator	0.173	−14.284*	8.646***
	(5.867)	(5.706)	(2.387)
Revealed by Recipient	−2.264	−6.496*	−2.126
	(2.865)	(3.073)	(1.784)
Position Intensity	−3.200	−2.873	6.573***
	(3.045)	(3.334)	(1.906)
Risk Index	0.057	0.533	−0.122
	(0.711)	(0.727)	(0.405)
SDI Anti-War Index	2.073	2.155	−1.537
	(1.339)	(1.336)	(0.818)
SDI Pro-War Index	0.271	1.569	2.516*
	(2.109)	(2.131)	(1.159)
IAS Index	−3.831	−5.264
	(3.922)	(4.258)
Num. Obs.	427	427	427
Adj. R-squared	0.019	0.023	0.080
Socio-demographic Controls	YES	YES	YES
* p < 0.05, p < 0.01, * p < 0.001

Appendix

Balance table

Variable	Overall N = 1,002 ¹	Treatment Groups			vl N = 402 ¹	p-value ²
Variable	Overall N = 1,002 ¹	baseline N = 204 ¹	forced_reveal N = 198 ¹	reveal_before N = 198 ¹	vl N = 402 ¹	p-value ²
Age	39 (11)	39 (11)	39 (12)	38 (11)	39 (11)	0.8
Gender	486 (49%)	99 (49%)	92 (46%)	102 (52%)	193 (48%)	0.8
Education	2 (1)	2 (1)	2 (1)	2 (1)	2 (1)	0.2
Income	3 (1)	3 (1)	3 (1)	3 (1)	3 (1)	0.021
Fully Employed						0.14
No	404 (40%)	80 (39%)	74 (37%)	94 (47%)	156 (39%)
Yes	598 (60%)	124 (61%)	124 (63%)	104 (53%)	246 (61%)
Married						0.8
No	491 (49%)	96 (47%)	101 (51%)	100 (51%)	194 (48%)
Yes	511 (51%)	108 (53%)	97 (49%)	98 (49%)	208 (52%)
Retired						0.9
No	895 (89%)	183 (90%)	174 (88%)	179 (90%)	359 (89%)
Yes	107 (11%)	21 (10%)	24 (12%)	19 (9.6%)	43 (11%)
Student						0.6
No	959 (96%)	192 (94%)	189 (95%)	191 (96%)	387 (96%)
Yes	43 (4.3%)	12 (5.9%)	9 (4.5%)	7 (3.5%)	15 (3.7%)
Government Worker						0.6
No	898 (90%)	186 (91%)	180 (91%)	178 (90%)	354 (88%)
Yes	104 (10%)	18 (8.8%)	18 (9.1%)	20 (10%)	48 (12%)
¹ Mean (SD); n (%)
² One-way analysis of means (not assuming equal variances); Pearson’s Chi-squared test