This report has been generated for park: Canyonlands NP
Park unit code: CANY
Monitoring location list: CANYCOLO, CANYGREEN
Monitoring season: Fall
Monitoring year: 2024
Notes for report?: Fall preliminary 11/8/24
This table is incorporated into the the standard format of acoustic monitoring reports, executive summary table. It can be copy and pasted into the existing format of the report template.
This table is incorporated into the the standard format of acoustic monitoring reports, executive summary table. It can be copy and pasted into the existing format of the report template.
| SiteID | Time | \(L_{A10}\) | \(L_{A50}\) | \(L_{Anat}\) | \(L_{A90}\) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CANYCOLO | Day | 33.9 | 25.7 | NA | 22.1 |
| CANYCOLO | Night | 41.9 | 38.5 | NA | 35.1 |
| CANYGREEN | Day | 32.2 | 24.1 | NA | 21.1 |
| CANYGREEN | Night | 43.6 | 39.2 | NA | 33.4 |
This table is incorporated into the the standard format of acoustic monitoring reports. It can be copy and pasted into the existing format of the report template.
|
Time above sound level
(% of daytime hours, 07:00 to 19:00) |
Time above sound level
(% of nighttime hours, 19:00 to 07:00) |
||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Site ID | Frequency (Hz) | 35 dB \(^A\) | 45 dB \(^A\) | 52 dB \(^A\) | 60 dB \(^A\) | 35 dB \(^A\) | 45 dB \(^A\) | 52 dB \(^A\) | 60 dB \(^A\) |
| CANYCOLO | Full (12.5-20,000) | 10.69 | 1.50 | 0.40 | 0.03 | 68.77 | 16.04 | 0.10 | 0.00 |
| CANYCOLO | ANS (20-1,250) \(^B\) | 5.06 | 1.00 | 0.25 | 0.02 | 0.50 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| CANYGREEN | Full (12.5-20,000) | 6.97 | 0.82 | 0.13 | 0.00 | 59.58 | 26.97 | 0.85 | 0.00 |
| CANYGREEN | ANS (20-1,250) \(^B\) | 5.69 | 0.60 | 0.06 | 0.00 | 1.19 | 0.07 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
This table provides a summary of the dBA impact by site and the reduction in listening area. It can be used for the Discussion section in the report
These tables are incorporated into the the standard format of acoustic monitoring reports. Each site includes the hourly sound source identification and the hourly percent time audible. After generating the metrics files with the listening lab data incorporated, run this Rmarkdown. Explore each table and identify NAs or source descriptions that do not make sense. Use this to guide potentially misidentified descriptions and return to the raw acoustic data to confirm or re-identify. If it is a mis-identification, reclassify the description with the correct identification in the original listening lab .txt file. Then re-run the metrics files process in AMT. Then re-run the RMarkdown document for a new table. It can then be copy and pasted into the existing format of the report template.
These tables are incorporated into the the standard format of acoustic monitoring reports. Each site includes the hourly sound source identification and the hourly percent time audible. After generating the metrics files with the listening lab data incorporated, run this Rmarkdown. Explore each table and identify NAs or source descriptions that do not make sense. Use this to guide potentially misidentified descriptions and return to the raw acoustic data to confirm or re-identify. If it is a mis-identification, reclassify the description with the correct identification in the original listening lab .txt file. Then re-run the metrics files process in AMT. Then re-run the RMarkdown document for a new table. It can then be copy and pasted into the existing format of the report template.
[1] TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE logical(0) logical(0) logical(0)
R:/NR_Soundscape/CANY River/Workspace (1D-3)/AcousticReportProcess/Code/NSNSDReporting/Fall_2024