library(readr)
library(ggplot2)
hr <- read_csv('https://raw.githubusercontent.com/aiplanethub/Datasets/refs/heads/master/HR_comma_sep.csv')
## Rows: 14999 Columns: 10
## ── Column specification ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
## Delimiter: ","
## chr (2): Department, salary
## dbl (8): satisfaction_level, last_evaluation, number_project, average_montly...
##
## ℹ Use `spec()` to retrieve the full column specification for this data.
## ℹ Specify the column types or set `show_col_types = FALSE` to quiet this message.
1) average_monthly_hours vs satisfaction_level
cor.test(hr$average_montly_hours, hr$satisfaction_level)
##
## Pearson's product-moment correlation
##
## data: hr$average_montly_hours and hr$satisfaction_level
## t = -2.4556, df = 14997, p-value = 0.01408
## alternative hypothesis: true correlation is not equal to 0
## 95 percent confidence interval:
## -0.036040356 -0.004045605
## sample estimates:
## cor
## -0.02004811
p-value interpretation: Since the dataset involes 14,999
observations, the p-value of more than .01 renders this correlation
statistically insignificant.
correlation estimate interpretation: There is no correlation between
average_monthly_hours and satisfaction_levels.
non-technical interpretation: Work hours have no impact on
satisfaction levels.
ggplot(hr, aes(x = average_montly_hours, y = satisfaction_level)) +
geom_point() +
geom_smooth(method = 'lm')+
labs(title = "Work Hours Have No Impact on Satisfaction Levels.",
x = "average_monthly_hours",
y = "time_spend_company")
## `geom_smooth()` using formula = 'y ~ x'

2) average_monthly_hours vs. time_spend_company
cor.test(hr$average_montly_hours, hr$time_spend_company)
##
## Pearson's product-moment correlation
##
## data: hr$average_montly_hours and hr$time_spend_company
## t = 15.774, df = 14997, p-value < 2.2e-16
## alternative hypothesis: true correlation is not equal to 0
## 95 percent confidence interval:
## 0.1119801 0.1434654
## sample estimates:
## cor
## 0.1277549
p-value interpretation: The p-value is very small, therefore the
correlation between average mopnthly hours and time spent at the company
is statistically significant.
correlation estimate interpretation: There is a weak positive
correlation.
non_technical interpretation: Employees Who Stay Longer Work
Slightly More Hours.
ggplot(hr, aes(x = average_montly_hours, y = time_spend_company)) +
geom_point() +
geom_smooth(method = 'lm')+
labs(title = "Employees Who Stay Longer Work Slightly More Hours.",
x = "average_monthly_hours",
y = "time_spend_company")
## `geom_smooth()` using formula = 'y ~ x'

3) time_spend_company vs. satisfaction_level
cor.test(hr$time_spend_company, hr$satisfaction_level)
##
## Pearson's product-moment correlation
##
## data: hr$time_spend_company and hr$satisfaction_level
## t = -12.416, df = 14997, p-value < 2.2e-16
## alternative hypothesis: true correlation is not equal to 0
## 95 percent confidence interval:
## -0.11668153 -0.08499948
## sample estimates:
## cor
## -0.1008661
p-value interprtation: The p-value is very small, therefore the
correlation between time_spend_company and satisfaction_level is
statisticall significant.
correlation estimate interpretation: There is a weak negative
correlation.
non-technical interpretation: Longer Tenured Employees feel slightly
less satisfied
ggplot(hr, aes(x = time_spend_company, y = satisfaction_level)) +
geom_point() +
geom_smooth(method = 'lm')+
labs(title = "Longer Tenured Employees Feel Slightly Less Satisfied.",
x = "time_spend_company",
y = "satisfaction_level")
## `geom_smooth()` using formula = 'y ~ x'

4) satisfaction_level vs. last_evaluation
cor.test(hr$satisfaction_level, hr$last_evaluation)
##
## Pearson's product-moment correlation
##
## data: hr$satisfaction_level and hr$last_evaluation
## t = 12.933, df = 14997, p-value < 2.2e-16
## alternative hypothesis: true correlation is not equal to 0
## 95 percent confidence interval:
## 0.08916727 0.12082195
## sample estimates:
## cor
## 0.1050212
p-value interpretation: The p-value is small, therefore the
correlation between satisfaction_level and last_evaluation is
statistically significant.
correlation estimate interpretation: There is a weak positive
correlation.
non-technical interpretation: Employees Felt Slightly More Satisfied
on Their Last Evaluation.
ggplot(hr, aes(x = satisfaction_level, y = last_evaluation)) +
geom_point() +
geom_smooth(method = 'lm')+
labs(title = "Employees Felt Slightly More Satisfied on Their Last Evaluation.",
x = "satisfaction_level",
y = "last_evaluation")
## `geom_smooth()` using formula = 'y ~ x'
