CIRAD hortsys
Human impact on the Earth’s land surface is accelerating.
Agriculture : over 50% of habitable land (Campbell et al. 2017).
Sustainable management : crucial for preserving biodiversity and its ecosystem services.
Yet, unsustainable practices continue to threaten biodiversity (Rigal et al. 2023, Raven & Wagner 2021, Dorrough & Scroggie 2008)
Ensuring sustainable use of biodiversity in agriculture is a major societal challenge.
Target 10 of the GBF calls for biodiversity-friendly agriculture (IPBES 2019)
Actions must be based on robust scientific evidence to halt biodiversity loss and restore ecosystem functioning.
Thousands of papers are published yearly on agricultural impacts on biodiversity.
How can decision-makers digest this vast information?
Challenge for clear, actionable insights needed by policymakers and practitioners
Biases may arise due to over- or under-representation of specific regions or taxa, publication bias
Heterogeneity or contradictory results in meta-analyses
We synthesized meta-analyses on agricultural practices and biodiversity, with the objectives:
High-Income Contribution: 50%+ from USA, China, Brazil, Canada, Germany, Australia, and Spain.
Less than 10% of studies focus on Africa
Prioritize biodiversity hotspots
60% of research : individual practices
50% of research focus on arthropods and unspecified microorganisms
40% of research focus on abundance/biomass metrics
is incredibly complex (vast amount of data, potential biases, and local effects…).
However, this complexity should not deter us from taking action!
Instead, it calls for concrete steps to enhance our understanding and management:
Continue to produce, aggregate and facilitate access to these data.
Address Local farmer and Policy Needs
Special thanks to Jonathan Bonfanti, Sarah Jones and all the team for their support and contributions.