Load in obesity dataset

library (tidyverse)
## Warning: package 'tidyverse' was built under R version 4.1.3
## Warning: package 'tibble' was built under R version 4.1.3
## Warning: package 'tidyr' was built under R version 4.1.3
## Warning: package 'readr' was built under R version 4.1.3
## Warning: package 'purrr' was built under R version 4.1.3
## Warning: package 'dplyr' was built under R version 4.1.3
## Warning: package 'forcats' was built under R version 4.1.3
## Warning: package 'lubridate' was built under R version 4.1.3
## -- Attaching core tidyverse packages ------------------------ tidyverse 2.0.0 --
## v dplyr     1.1.2     v readr     2.1.4
## v forcats   1.0.0     v stringr   1.5.1
## v ggplot2   3.3.5     v tibble    3.2.1
## v lubridate 1.9.2     v tidyr     1.3.0
## v purrr     1.0.1     
## -- Conflicts ------------------------------------------ tidyverse_conflicts() --
## x dplyr::filter() masks stats::filter()
## x dplyr::lag()    masks stats::lag()
## i Use the conflicted package (<http://conflicted.r-lib.org/>) to force all conflicts to become errors
obesity <- read.csv(file.choose())

1. A list of at least three columns that were unclear until after reading the documentation

Column 1: FAVC

Column 2: FAF

Column 3: CALC

2. At least one element that is still unclear after reading the documentation

3. A visualization of the column brought up in question 2

obesity |>
  ggplot()+
  geom_bar(mapping = aes(x = NObeyesdad, fill = NObeyesdad)) +
  theme_minimal() +
  scale_fill_brewer(palette = 'RdPu') +
  labs(title='Obesity Level', x = 'Obesity Level', y = 'Count')+
  theme(axis.text.x = element_text(angle = 90, hjust = 1))  

This visualization looks at the one column that is still not entirely clear to me, even after reading the documentation, NObeyesdad (Obesity level). I chose to represent this in a bar graph because it is categorical data. However, what was unclear to me is still unclear after visualizing it - what are the requirements for each obesity type, and how are they calculating them? Is there a standard, or is it their own categorization based on their sample? They could be using BMI to categorize people, or just weight, or another categorization technique entirely. As I mentioned previously, there is not a standard way to put people in these categories across the board, so documentation on how they are placed is necessary.