Survey Completion

So far, 2270 surveys have been completed. There are 2215 surveys to go!

Surveys Completed in Last Week
Oblast Sep 10 Sep 11 Sep 12 Sep 13 Sep 14 Sep 15 Sep 16 Total This Week Total to Date Female Under35 35to50 Over50
Batken 35 10 4 40 46 40 1 176 765 50% 24% 35% 41%
Jalal-Abad 48 36 34 13 25 9 0 165 666 49% 25% 29% 45%
Osh 6 13 5 0 4 3 0 31 839 49% 28% 33% 39%

Village-Level Completion and Village Issues

Update on village-level completion:

  • Data collection has been finished in 13 villages, but there are issues with 7 villages. Please check below!
  • Data collection is ongoing in 69 villages
  • Data collection has not yet started in 32 villages
Finished Villages
Oblast AA Village Baseline Endline Duplicated ID Gender Matches Baseline Note
Баткен Ak-Turpak Chogorok 10 10 0 Yes Data collection complete
Баткен Ak-Turpak Tokoy 9 9 0 Yes Data collection complete
Баткен Birlik Bel 20 20 0 Yes Data collection complete
Баткен Birlik Jal 26 26 0 Yes Data collection complete
Баткен Leylek Kara-Suu 29 31 0 No Too many surveys in this village AND gender balance incorrect. Please check.
Баткен Moldo Niyaz Shybran 8 10 0 Yes Too many surveys in this village. Please check.
Баткен Tort-Gul Ak-Otok 10 10 0 Yes Data collection complete
Баткен Tort-Gul Ak-Turpak 24 24 0 No Data collection complete but gender balance incorrect
Жалал-Абад Akman Tash-Bulak 12 12 2 Yes Data collection complete but duplicate IDs. Please check.
Жалал-Абад Kyzyl-Tuu Jashasyn-2 17 17 0 No Data collection complete but gender balance incorrect
Ош Kenesh Ak-Terek 10 32 0 No Too many surveys in this village AND gender balance incorrect. Please check.
Ош Papan Karagur 11 11 0 Yes Data collection complete
Ош Papan Papan 17 19 0 No Too many surveys in this village AND gender balance incorrect. Please check.

UniqueID Errors

Please refer to file uniqueID_issues_20240917.csv for the complete list of surveys with Unique ID errors.

  • In the last week, there have been 16 duplicated submissions.
  • There are 60 entries with UNRESOLVED duplicated unique IDs.
  • The teams in Jalal-Abad have the most duplicates at 46!
  • There are 6 entries with a Unique ID not found in the baseline data.

Attrition and Recontacting

So far, the overall recontact rate for households is 66%, and the recontact rate for individuals is 57%.

Recontact Statistics, by Respondent Gender
Recontact Rate Household
Recontact Rate Respondent
sex_baseline_name Week 1 Week 2 Week 3 Week 4 Week 1 Week 2 Week 3 Week 4
Female 69% 67% 66% 58% 62% 60% 53% 47%
Male 70% 70% 58% 58% 62% 59% 51% 48%
Total 69% 69% 62% 58% 62% 60% 52% 48%
Recontact Statistics, by Oblast (since data collection began)
Oblast Recontact Rate (HH) Recontact Rate (Resp) Replaced Wrong Gender Replaced Too Young
Batken 66% 56% 14 0
Jalal-Abad 45% 34% 38 0
Osh 81% 75% 14 0
Total 66% 57% 66 0

Poor Replacements

The following enumerators replaced the baseline respondent with someone of the incorrect gender.

Replaced with Wrong Gender
ono fi Week 2 Week 4 Week 3 Week 1
Batken Gulmira_Is 0 2 0 0
Jalal-Abad Aisha_M 0 2 0 3
Batken Baktybek_M 0 1 0 0
Batken Busadat_S 0 1 3 0
Batken Gulmira_D 0 1 0 0
Batken Omurbek_A 0 1 0 1
Jalal-Abad Aibolot_K 2 1 2 2
Jalal-Abad Dinara_R 0 1 0 0
Jalal-Abad Malika_A 0 1 1 0
Osh Ainagul_A 0 1 0 0
Batken Altynai_B 2 0 0 0
Batken Minavar_T 0 0 1 0
Batken Zhiidegul_M 1 0 0 0
Jalal-Abad Baiel_A 2 0 1 3
Jalal-Abad Beksultan_J 0 0 3 3
Jalal-Abad Erlan_M 0 0 0 3
Jalal-Abad Kadyrali_J 0 0 1 3
Jalal-Abad Nursultan_T 1 0 1 2
Osh Elmira_B 0 0 1 2
Osh Indira_K 0 0 0 1
Osh Kunduz_K 0 0 0 1
Osh Nazgul_P 2 0 0 1
Osh Tynychbek_A 1 0 1 0
Osh Карабаев 1 0 0 1
Osh Сайфудинов Алихан 0 0 0 1

Replacements by Enumerator

Enumerators with Lowest Recontact Rate
Oblast Enumerator Surveys Recontact Rate (HH) Recontact Rate (Resp) Bad Replacement
Batken Busadat_S 56 16% 14% 4
Jalal-Abad Malika_A 42 19% 17% 2
Jalal-Abad Kadyrali_J 98 38% 18% 4
Jalal-Abad Aisha_M 87 26% 20% 5
Jalal-Abad Nursultan_T 53 40% 28% 4
Jalal-Abad Baiel_A 96 35% 30% 6
Jalal-Abad Aibolot_K 77 39% 31% 7
Batken Turgunai_S 44 32% 32% 0
Batken Cholpon_K 52 52% 38% 0
Batken Baktybek_M 44 50% 41% 1
Jalal-Abad Beksultan_J 113 70% 48% 6
Jalal-Abad Erlan_M 21 62% 48% 3

Time Stamps

Time Statistics

Section Times Statistics
Overall
This Week
Section Median 25th % 75th % Median 25th % 75th %
time_sec_a 0.2 0.2 0.5 0.2 0.2 0.4
time_sec_b 4.8 3.5 6.9 4.3 3.2 6.0
time_sec_c 1.0 0.8 1.4 0.9 0.6 1.2
time_sec_conjoint 0.6 0.3 1.2 0.6 0.3 1.3
time_sec_d 10.1 7.0 14.4 8.9 5.7 13.4
time_sec_d1_d26 3.5 2.5 5.1 3.2 2.1 4.6
time_sec_d30_d60 4.9 3.4 6.8 4.0 2.8 6.2
time_sec_d61_d74 1.0 0.2 2.2 1.0 0.3 2.2
time_sec_e 10.0 7.2 14.0 8.8 6.1 13.2
time_sec_f 3.3 2.3 4.6 2.9 1.9 4.1
time_sec_g 4.2 3.0 6.3 3.7 2.7 5.6
time_sec_g1_g14 2.0 1.4 3.0 1.7 1.2 2.6
time_sec_g15_g31 2.1 1.5 3.2 1.9 1.3 2.9
time_sec_h 3.3 2.4 4.8 2.9 2.1 4.3
time_sec_h1_h9 1.0 0.7 1.5 0.9 0.6 1.4
time_sec_h10_h40 3.3 2.4 4.8 2.9 2.1 4.3
time_sec_i 1.0 0.7 1.7 0.8 0.6 1.5
time_sec_k 0.8 0.6 1.4 0.7 0.5 1.1
time_sec_list 0.2 0.1 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.4
time_sec_total 43.1 31.8 56.0 39.0 28.8 52.1

Change in Duration Over Time

Duration by Enumerator

The table below shows median section times for enumerators with surveys with shorter than average median survey times.

Shortest Survey Times by Enumerator (Last Week)
Enumerator ono Surveys Median Median: Sec B Median: Sec C Median: Sec D Electricity Median: Sec D Oth Services Median: Sec D CSP Median: Sec E Median: Sec E Conjoint Median: Sec F Median: Sec G COVID Median: Sec G Climate Median: Sec H Gender Median: Sec H Disability Median: Sec I Sum
Baiel_A Jalal-Abad 9 17.4 2.6 0.4 2.0 1.8 0.0 4.0 0.3 1.2 0.8 0.8 0.4 1.8 0.9 17.0
Kadyrali_J Jalal-Abad 9 21.9 2.7 0.8 2.0 2.5 0.0 6.2 0.4 1.6 1.4 1.8 0.9 2.4 0.6 23.3
Beksultan_J Jalal-Abad 23 23.2 2.5 0.8 2.2 2.6 0.1 6.5 0.4 1.7 1.5 1.5 0.5 1.9 0.6 22.8
Baktybek_M Batken 9 24.0 4.2 0.6 1.6 2.9 0.7 5.3 0.2 1.8 1.4 1.4 0.8 2.5 0.7 24.1
Gulmira_Im Batken 3 25.9 4.8 0.6 2.0 3.2 1.4 6.0 0.3 1.6 1.8 1.0 0.6 2.1 0.4 25.8
Busadat_S Batken 20 26.1 3.0 0.4 1.4 1.6 0.6 3.8 0.2 1.4 0.8 1.0 0.3 1.5 0.5 16.5
Aisha_M Jalal-Abad 11 26.5 2.1 0.9 2.1 3.2 0.8 7.3 0.6 2.1 1.6 1.5 1.4 3.6 0.8 28.0
Aibolot_K Jalal-Abad 12 28.8 4.1 1.6 2.4 3.2 0.0 7.4 0.6 2.2 1.0 1.1 0.5 2.2 0.6 26.9
Карабаев Osh 4 32.3 5.4 0.5 4.2 3.5 0.1 9.1 0.2 2.0 1.4 1.4 0.4 1.9 0.5 30.6
Malika_A Jalal-Abad 22 33.2 3.5 0.9 2.5 4.2 0.3 8.6 0.9 3.2 2.0 1.9 1.0 3.0 0.8 32.8
Elmira_B Osh 11 33.4 4.2 0.6 2.0 3.8 1.3 7.4 0.5 3.2 1.6 2.0 0.7 2.4 0.8 30.5
Gulburak_T Batken 11 35.5 5.6 1.0 3.4 5.7 2.4 5.2 0.2 2.4 1.6 1.8 0.6 2.2 0.9 33.0
Omurbek_A Batken 11 35.9 5.6 0.6 2.2 2.5 1.0 7.8 0.3 2.7 1.6 2.1 0.9 2.7 0.8 30.8
Dinara_R Jalal-Abad 31 37.0 5.7 0.9 3.5 4.0 0.3 8.7 0.8 3.7 1.8 2.1 1.0 3.1 0.9 36.5
Minavar_T Batken 16 38.8 3.8 1.0 3.2 4.3 2.7 11.6 1.9 3.2 1.6 1.8 0.9 2.0 1.2 39.2
Gulmira_Is Batken 10 39.7 10.3 0.9 2.4 3.3 0.8 5.5 0.3 1.4 1.2 1.6 0.6 2.3 0.8 31.4

Answer Quality

Don’t Knows

Statistics:

  • The median survey has 5 “don’t know” answers.
  • The 75th percentile survey has 13 “don’t know” answers.
  • The median enumerator has 5 “don’t know” answers on average.

The enumerators below have recorded a very large number of Don’t Knows on many surveys! We expect some respondents will say don’t know, but enumerators should not consistently report more Don’t Knows than other enumerators!

Most Don’t Knows by Enumerator (Last week)
Enumerator ono Surveys Surveys > 75 perc DKs Median Max
Dinara_R Jalal-Abad 31 28 28 75
Осмонова Венера Jalal-Abad 18 14 22 44
Baktybek_M Batken 9 8 19 30
Садыкова Чинара Jalal-Abad 23 15 17 28
Minavar_T Batken 16 10 15 31
Beksultan_J Jalal-Abad 23 6 7 30

Agree / Disagree

This table shows the average HHI, by enumerator, of the responses to 25 agreement-style questions in the survey. The HHI is a metric that indicates the ‘diversification’ in responses to the agreement questions.

An average HHI of 1 indicates that the enumerator records the same answer for all 25 agreement questions on every survey they enumerated. As the average HHI approaches 0, it indicates that the enumerator tends to record the same number of responses at each level of agreement for each survey.

Average HHIs above 0.70 indicate the enumerator is very often recording the same answer. Average HHIs below 0.3 indicate the enumerator is recording a lot of different options.

Agree / Disagree Responses per Enumerator (last week)
Oblast Enumerator Surveys Avg HHI Avg % Str. Agr Avg % Agr Avg % Neither Avg % Dis Avg % Str. Dis Avg % DK
Jalal-Abad 358-091-016 1 0.841 0.000 0.913 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.087
Jalal-Abad Kadyrali_J 9 0.763 0.860 0.000 0.014 0.072 0.092 0.010
Osh Карабаев 4 0.719 0.108 0.837 0.011 0.043 0.000 0.000
Jalal-Abad Aibolot_K 12 0.718 0.021 0.832 0.018 0.125 0.000 0.028
Batken Gulburak_T 11 0.705 0.069 0.806 0.087 0.034 0.015 0.000

Summary of problematic interviews

How problematic interviews are determined:

  • Duration : the number of sections with time stamps below 25 percentile. The following sections are assessed: B, D1 (electricity), D2 (other services), E, F, G1 (covid), G2 (climate change), H2 (disability), Total survey (sections B-I). Since survey time can sometimes be unreliable if the respondent goes back to the beginning of the survey, I look at the number of sections that are very short - not just the total survey time.
  • Don’t Knows : how many don’t know responses are in the survey
  • Similarity in Question Response : how similar answers are to agree/disagree questions (for example, if the enumerator selects ``somewhat agree” in 95% A/D questions)
  • Location: respondents should not all be in the same location.

Please check the file issues_20240917.csv to see all problematic interviews. Below is just a summary by oblast.

Problematic Surveys by Oblast
Date Batken Jalal-Abad Osh
Aug 20 3 5 28
Aug 21 8 7 48
Aug 22 4 13 29
Aug 23 2 12 16
Aug 24 3 7 20
Aug 25 10 16 31
Aug 26 7 12 13
Aug 27 3 18 16
Aug 28 2 17 16
Aug 29 12 21 17
Aug 30 9 20 15
Aug 31 26 23 10
Sep 01 14 11 23
Sep 02 4 20 8
Sep 03 1 20 5
Sep 04 5 20 5
Sep 05 3 14 0
Sep 06 4 21 11
Sep 07 21 37 24
Sep 08 18 31 34
Sep 09 11 27 5
Sep 10 13 36 5
Sep 11 2 24 5
Sep 12 0 30 3
Sep 13 17 13 0
Sep 14 19 14 2
Sep 15 19 6 1
Oct 09 1 0 0
Total 241 495 390
## # A tibble: 103 × 7
## # Groups:   fi, fs [36]
##    fi                        fs date_text     n median perc25 perc75
##    <chr>                  <int> <chr>     <int>  <dbl>  <dbl>  <dbl>
##  1 "358\nОсмонова Венера"     2 Sep 14        1   54.8   54.8   54.8
##  2 "358-091-016"              2 Sep 14        1   44.1   44.1   44.1
##  3 "Adilet_S"                 4 Sep 09        4   65.4   62.5   68.7
##  4 "Adilet_S"                 4 Sep 14        1   21.5   21.5   21.5
##  5 "Aibolot_K"                2 Sep 10        5   27.4   26.9   28.3
##  6 "Aibolot_K"                2 Sep 11        4   30.7   30.4   35.8
##  7 "Aibolot_K"                2 Sep 13        3   28.2   24.8   28.7
##  8 "Ainagul_A"                4 Sep 14        2   59.2   52.4   66  
##  9 "Ainur_T"                  1 Sep 09        8   62.8   46.7   96.4
## 10 "Ainur_T"                  1 Sep 10       10   96     73.4  117. 
## # ℹ 93 more rows

Summary of enumerator performance

The following table shows indicators for enumerator performance. You can sort the table to see how enumerators perform.

Please pay special attention to the following enumerators: Baiel_A, Kadyrali_J, Beksultan_J, Карабаев, Aibolot_K, Aisha_M, Elmira_B, Baktybek_M, Minavar_T, Malika_A, Gulmira_Im, Busadat_S, Dinara_R, Gulburak_T, Zhiidegul_M, Omurbek_A, Altynai_B, Gulmira_D, Gulmira_Is, Садыкова Чинара, Осмонова Венера!!