library(tidyverse)
## ── Attaching core tidyverse packages ──────────────────────── tidyverse 2.0.0 ──
## ✔ dplyr 1.1.4 ✔ readr 2.1.5
## ✔ forcats 1.0.0 ✔ stringr 1.5.1
## ✔ ggplot2 3.5.1 ✔ tibble 3.2.1
## ✔ lubridate 1.9.3 ✔ tidyr 1.3.1
## ✔ purrr 1.0.2
## ── Conflicts ────────────────────────────────────────── tidyverse_conflicts() ──
## ✖ dplyr::filter() masks stats::filter()
## ✖ dplyr::lag() masks stats::lag()
## ℹ Use the conflicted package (<http://conflicted.r-lib.org/>) to force all conflicts to become errors
library(readxl)
library(readxl)
district<-read_excel("district.xls")
new_district<-district %>% select(DISTNAME,DPETSPEP,DPFPASPEP)
head(new_district)
## # A tibble: 6 × 3
## DISTNAME DPETSPEP DPFPASPEP
## <chr> <dbl> <dbl>
## 1 CAYUGA ISD 14.6 28.9
## 2 ELKHART ISD 12.1 8.8
## 3 FRANKSTON ISD 13.1 8.4
## 4 NECHES ISD 10.5 10.1
## 5 PALESTINE ISD 13.5 6.1
## 6 WESTWOOD ISD 14.5 9.4
summary(new_district$DPETSPEP)
## Min. 1st Qu. Median Mean 3rd Qu. Max.
## 0.00 9.90 12.10 12.27 14.20 51.70
summary(new_district$DPFPASPEP)
## Min. 1st Qu. Median Mean 3rd Qu. Max. NA's
## 0.000 5.800 8.900 9.711 12.500 49.000 5
# DPFPASPEP has missing values
new_district_cleaned<-new_district %>% filter(DPFPASPEP>0)
# there are now 1201 observations left
ggplot(new_district_cleaned,aes(DPFPASPEP,DPETSPEP)) + geom_point()

# there is positive correlation between these variables
cor(new_district_cleaned$DPFPASPEP,new_district_cleaned$DPETSPEP)
## [1] 0.371033
# my takeaway of this result is the varibales having about 37% correlation wiht each other, and it is a positive relationship because it is above 0.