class: center, middle, inverse, title-slide .title[ # The State of Climate Policy ] .subtitle[ ## Climate Policy and Politics in US State Legislatures, 2011 to 2023 ] .author[ ### Boris Shor and Jennifer Clark ] .date[ ### September 5, 2024 ] --- <style type="text/css"> .regression table { font-size: 12px; } </style> --- # California enacts SB 253, October 2023 <img src="data:image/png;base64,#Graphics/newsom.jpg" width="60%" style="display: block; margin: auto;" /> --- # Recent Policies - 2023 - SB 704: Harder to build oil and gas developments off coast - SB 253: Mandatory emissions transparency for large companies - AB 1373: Allowing state to sign long-term electricity contracts with wind and geothermal projects - AB 579: All school buses zero emission by 2035 - AB 1389: Targets for electriv vehicle charging stations - SB 619: Speed up permitting for electric lines - 2022 - AB 1279: Carbon neutrality by 2045 - AB 1020: Target 90% of electricity from clean sources by 2035 and 95% by 2040 --- # States are where the action is - Policy gridlock much more likely in Washington compared to states - Regulation of energy and environment is frequently most done at the state level - Lower level governments are at the control of states --- # Diffusion - Policies spread to 'similar' states - New York, Washington, and Massachusetts are going to follow California - Louisiana, Florida, Georgia are going to follow Texas - Policies spread to federal government depending on the presidential administration --- # New Big Data on Roll Call Votes and Bills New data on *all* roll call votes and bills in 50 states between 2011 and 2023 - 1.13m bills - 688k roll calls on floor - All vote types: amendments, early stage, final passage - Today we are presenting work aggregated at various levels: - Roll call, chamber, state, individual legislator --- # Challenge 1: How to find climate bills? Two strategies: automated and human expert-coded - Keyword-assisted topic modeling (Eshima, Imai, and Sasaki 2024) - 110k bills on climate, energy, environment - Automated topic modeling - Center for New Energy Economy at Colorado State - 40k bills - Manually coded by expert team with detailed codes --- # Topic Model Data Table: Topic Modeling Data Summary |Subset | Bills| Cmte Roll Calls| Floor Roll Calls| Cmte Votes| Floor Votes| |:-------------|-------:|---------------:|----------------:|----------:|-----------:| |All | 109,983| 39,476| 57,078| 444,442| 4,050,501| |Non-unanimous | 18,694| 13,524| 28,739| 163,019| 2,254,734| |Passed | 21,674| 22,370| 44,594| 251,881| 3,078,505| |Failed | 88,309| 17,107| 12,485| 192,561| 971,996| --- # Subject coding: automated vs human expert - If experts code a bill about energy and climate, the topic model agrees 69% of the time. If they don't, the topic model agrees 94% of the time <img src="data:image/png;base64,#shor-clark-apsa-2024_short_files/figure-html/unnamed-chunk-5-1.png" width="80%" style="display: block; margin: auto;" /> --- # Challenge 2: Bill content - We find many thousands of these bills. But what's in them? - Even if we know the *policy area* we don't know in which *direction* policy is being made - Alternative strategy is to use contextual data, mostly from bill sponsors - Bill-level data - Good: Sponsor partisanship - Democratic only, Republican only, Bipartisan - Better: Sponsor ideology - median sponsor's ideal point - Shor-McCarty scores (2011, 2022) --- # Partisanship of Bills that Passed - Unified legislatures are more likely to pass majority bills, but bipartisan bills are quite common <div class="figure" style="text-align: center"> <img src="data:image/png;base64,#shor-clark-apsa-2024_short_files/figure-html/unnamed-chunk-6-1.png" alt="Passed Bill Sponsorship Rates" width="80%" /> <p class="caption">Passed Bill Sponsorship Rates</p> </div> --- # Sponsor ideology of bills that passed - Of the bills that pass, moderate and ideological bills do well, depending on the context <div class="figure" style="text-align: center"> <img src="data:image/png;base64,#shor-clark-apsa-2024_short_files/figure-html/unnamed-chunk-7-1.png" alt="Passed Bill Sponsorship Rates, By Ideology" width="80%" /> <p class="caption">Passed Bill Sponsorship Rates, By Ideology</p> </div> --- # Cumulative Outcomes - If we look at all bills cumulatively, moderate bills account for half the total <div class="figure" style="text-align: center"> <img src="data:image/png;base64,#shor-clark-apsa-2024_short_files/figure-html/unnamed-chunk-8-1.png" alt="Bill Outcomes by Ideology" width="80%" /> <p class="caption">Bill Outcomes by Ideology</p> </div> --- # Trends - Nevertheless the trend is for the average climate and energy bill to be more liberal over time <div class="figure" style="text-align: center"> <img src="data:image/png;base64,#shor-clark-apsa-2024_short_files/figure-html/unnamed-chunk-9-1.png" alt="Average Passed Bill Sponsor Ideology over Time" width="80%" /> <p class="caption">Average Passed Bill Sponsor Ideology over Time</p> </div> --- # Trends by Legislative Context (Passed) - This trend of increased liberalism is most pronounced in Democratic legislatures - Bills passed in Republican legislatures are fairly moderate by comparison <div class="figure" style="text-align: center"> <img src="data:image/png;base64,#shor-clark-apsa-2024_short_files/figure-html/unnamed-chunk-10-1.png" alt="Average Passed Bill Sponsor Ideology over Time by Majority Party" width="80%" /> <p class="caption">Average Passed Bill Sponsor Ideology over Time by Majority Party</p> </div> --- # State Trends: Northeast <div class="figure" style="text-align: center"> <img src="data:image/png;base64,#shor-clark-apsa-2024_short_files/figure-html/unnamed-chunk-11-1.png" alt="State Bill Sponsorship Trends by State, Northeast" width="90%" /> <p class="caption">State Bill Sponsorship Trends by State, Northeast</p> </div> --- # State Trends: Midwest <div class="figure" style="text-align: center"> <img src="data:image/png;base64,#shor-clark-apsa-2024_short_files/figure-html/unnamed-chunk-12-1.png" alt="State Bill Sponsorship Trends by State, Midwest" width="90%" /> <p class="caption">State Bill Sponsorship Trends by State, Midwest</p> </div> --- # State Trends: South <div class="figure" style="text-align: center"> <img src="data:image/png;base64,#shor-clark-apsa-2024_short_files/figure-html/unnamed-chunk-13-1.png" alt="State Bill Sponsorship Trends by State, South" width="90%" /> <p class="caption">State Bill Sponsorship Trends by State, South</p> </div> --- # State Trends: West <div class="figure" style="text-align: center"> <img src="data:image/png;base64,#shor-clark-apsa-2024_short_files/figure-html/unnamed-chunk-14-1.png" alt="State Bill Sponsorship Trends by State, West" width="90%" /> <p class="caption">State Bill Sponsorship Trends by State, West</p> </div> --- # Median bill sponsor by state - The average climate bill tracks state legislative ideology, but shaded to the left - Compare California and Texas <div class="figure" style="text-align: center"> <img src="data:image/png;base64,#shor-clark-apsa-2024_short_files/figure-html/unnamed-chunk-15-1.png" alt="Median Sponsor" width="80%" /> <p class="caption">Median Sponsor</p> </div> --- # Majority Rolls by Majority Party and Bill Sponsor Party - Democratic bills do surpisingly well in Republican legislatures, and this is partly do the vastly higher rate at which these majorities are rolled <div class="figure" style="text-align: center"> <img src="data:image/png;base64,#shor-clark-apsa-2024_short_files/figure-html/unnamed-chunk-16-1.png" alt="Majority Party Rolls by Majority and Sponsor Party" width="80%" /> <p class="caption">Majority Party Rolls by Majority and Sponsor Party</p> </div> --- # Legislator-level vote model (distance measure) - We model legislative votes on climate bills as a function of the (absolute) distance between the legislator and the bill sponsor - We control for district opinion measured via Republican presidential vote share - As distance goes up, the legislator is less likely to vote for the bill
Democratic
Bipartisan
Republican
District Presidential Vote
-0.101***
-0.060***
-0.047**
(0.008)
(0.010)
(0.015)
Legislator-Bill Ideological Distance
-0.173***
-0.204***
-0.218***
(0.007)
(0.009)
(0.012)
N
86,034
78,902
37,355
Standard errors displayed in parens. *p<0.05; **p<0.01; ***p<0.001
--- class: center, middle, inverse # Thanks! Next Steps and Questions Boris: [**bshor@uh.edu**](mailto:bshor@uh.edu) and [**@bshor**](https://twitter.com/bshor) Jennifer: [**jclar2@uh.edu**](mailto:jclar2@uh.edu)