Photo credit: Lee Thrasher, UF WFREC
Photo credit: Lee Thrasher, UF WFREC

Background

Fire is an important disturbance process in almost every ecosystem in the world1. However, catastrophic wildfires have claimed numerous lives and destroyed countless homes2. Therefore, understanding wildfire risk is of profound social and economic importance.

Heightened wildfire risk is driven by a number of factors, such as climate change, decades of fire suppression, and the expansion of residential developments into highly vegetated areas . The area with the greatest wildfire risk is known as the wildland-urban interface (WUI). The WUI is the area where human structures intermingle with flammable vegetation. WUI areas experience higher wildfire risk due to greater potential for human ignitions, the presence of flammable invasive species, and limited accessibility for firefighters.

How to Use this Tool

Below are four interactive maps showing:

  1. The percent of each state categorized as WUI for the years 1990, 2000, 2010, and 2020
  2. The number of wildfire fatalities in each state between 1999 and 2020
  3. The number of structures damaged and destroyed by wildfires in each state between 1999 and 2020
  4. The total cost to suppress wildfires in each state between 1999 and 2020

To use each map, you can zoom in or out and click on your area of interest to see state-level statistics.

WUI Growth

In recent decades, the United States WUI has grown substantially. In 1990, the WUI only covered 7.2% (579,172 km2) of the total land area of the conterminous United States. In 2020, that number had grown to 9.4% (758,503 km2). Additionally, 29.5% (29.9 million) of all houses in the United States were in the WUI in 1990. In 2020, more than 31.5% (43.9 million) of houses were in the WUI3.

Figure 1. An interactive map showing the percent of each state that is categorized as wildland-urban interface (WUI) across the United States in 1990, 2000, 2010, and 2020 [Data source].

Wildfire Fatalities

Between 1999 and 2020, 543 people lost their lives to wildfires. Most fatalities occurred in California, with 287 deaths from wildfires. Arizona and Texas had 25 or more fatalities. Colorado, Oregon, Wisconsin, and Tennessee had more than 15 fatalities.

Figure 2. An interactive map showing the number of responder and public fatalities from wildfires between 1999 and 2020 by state across the continental United States [Data source].

Building Loss to Wildfires

Between 1999 and 2020, wildfires destroyed over 108 thousand structures and damaged over 73 thousand. California experienced the greatest structure loss, with over 51 thousands structures damaged and over 66 thousand structures destroyed by wildfires during this time. Oklahoma and Oregon experienced also substantial structure loss, with over 4,000 structures damaged and 4,000 destroyed.

Figure 3. An interactive map showing the number of structures damaged and destroyed by wildfires between 1999 and 2020 by state across the continental United States [Data source].

Wildfire Suppression Costs

Between 1999 and 2020, wildfires required over $30.6 billion to suppress. The majority of these suppression costs were concentrated in the western U.S., particularly California. However, eastern U.S. states such as Florida, North Carolina, Texas, and Georgia required over $100 million to suppress wildfires during this period.

Figure 4. An interactive map showing the cost to suppress wildfires between 1999 and 2020 by state across the continental United States [Data source].

What Can We Do?

Wildfire risk management is crucial for everyone living in and near wildland vegetation. Property owners, forest managers, and the general public should be aware of this risk and take precautionary measures to avoid serious loss from wildfire. Communities can work together to inform one another about the risk of flammable vegetation near homes and take action to reduce the associated risk.

One way that land owners and forest managers can reduce wildfire risk is through the systematic and intentional use of prescribed fire. Prescribed fire has been shown to mitigate wildfire risk by reducing previously accumulated fuels that would otherwise allow wildfires to spread toward buildings4. Burning can also promote ecosystem health by improving nutrient cycling, creating a more diverse habitat for wildlife, and facilitating native plant growth5.

Another way to mitigate wildfire risk is by creating defensible spaces around structures, thereby placing a buffer between flammable vegetation and homes6. Homeowners can remove debris and flammable materials close to their homes. Builders can also utilize fire-resistant materials in the construction of new homes7.

Land owners, forest managers, and policymakers should collaborate in order to protect our lives and property from the threat of wildfire.

Photo credit: Lee Thrasher, UF WFREC
Photo credit: Lee Thrasher, UF WFREC



References

1. McLauchlan, K. K., Higuera, P. E., Miesel, J., Rogers, B. M., Schweitzer, J., Shuman, J. K., Tepley, A. J., Varner, J. M., Veblen, T. T., Adalsteinsson, S. A., Balch, J. K., Baker, P., Batllori, E., Bigio, E., Brando, P., Cattau, M., Chipman, M. L., Coen, J., Crandall, R., … Watts, A. C. (2020). Fire as a fundamental ecological process: Research advances and frontiers. Journal of Ecology, 108(5), 2047–2069. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.13403
2. Modaresi Rad, A., Abatzoglou, J. T., Kreitler, J., Alizadeh, M. R., AghaKouchak, A., Hudyma, N., Nauslar, N. J., & Sadegh, M. (2023). Human and infrastructure exposure to large wildfires in the United States. Nature Sustainability, 6(11), 1343–1351. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-023-01163-z
3. Radeloff, V. C., Helmers, D. P., Mockrin, M. H., Carlson, A. R., Hawbaker, T. J., & Martinuzzi, S. (2023). The 1990-2020 wildland-urban interface of the conterminous United States - geospatial data (4th Edition). https://doi.org/10.2737/RDS-2015-0012-4
4. Van Liew, D. (2012). An Economic Comparison of Prescribed Extreme Fire and Alternative Methods for Managing Invasive Brush Species in Texas: a Modeling Approach. The Open Agriculture Journal, 6(1), 17–26. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874331501206010017
5. Noss, R. F., Franklin, J. F., Baker, W. L., Schoennagel, T., & Moyle, P. B. (2006). Managing fire-prone forests in the western United States. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 4(9), 481–487. https://doi.org/10.1890/1540-9295(2006)4[481:MFFITW]2.0.CO;2
6. Syphard, A. D., Brennan, T. J., & Keeley, J. E. (2014). The role of defensible space for residential structure protection during wildfires. International Journal of Wildland Fire, 23(8), 11651175.
7. Intini, P., Ronchi, E., Gwynne, S., & Bénichou, N. (2020). Guidance on Design and Construction of the Built Environment Against Wildland Urban Interface Fire Hazard: A Review. Fire Technology, 56(5), 1853–1883. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-019-00902-z