Homework Chapter 08

Research in Finance

1 Problem 5:

1.1 (a)

Briefly outline Johansen’s methodology for testing for cointegration between a set of variables in the context of a VAR.

A VAR with k lags containing these variables could be set up:

\[\begin{eqnarray} y_{t} &=& \beta_{1}y_{t-1} &+ \beta_{2}y_{t-2} &+...+&\beta_{k}y_{t-k}\\ g\times 1 && g\times g g\times 1&g\times g g\times 1&&g\times g g\times 1 \end{eqnarray}\]

Transform the VAR model into a Vector Error Correction Model (VECM) to incorporate potential long-run relationships.

\[\begin{eqnarray} \Delta y_{t} &=& (\beta_{1}-I)(y_{t-1}-y_{t-2})&+ (\beta_{1}+\beta_{2}+I)y_{t-2}&+...\\ &=& \Gamma_{1} \Delta y_{t-1} &+ \Gamma_{2} \Delta y_{t-2} &+...+ (\beta_{1}+\beta_{2}+..+\beta_{k}-I)y_{t-k} + u_{t} \end{eqnarray}\]

In the long run: \(t \to +\infty\): \(\Pi_{y}=0\)

\(\Rightarrow\) 0 is one eigenvalue of \(\Pi_{y}\)

\(\Rightarrow\ r=rank\ \Pi \le g-1\)

Johansen test \(r = rank \Pi = the\ number\ of\ cointegration\ relationship\)

\[H_{0}: r = 0\ vs\ H_{1}: r> 0\\ H_{0}: r = 1\ vs\ H_{1}: r> 1\]

From \(r = rank\ \Pi\): (\(r=1, g=4\))

\[\begin{eqnarray} \Pi &=& \alpha &\times& \beta'\\ g\times g && g\times r&& r \times g \\ \Rightarrow \Pi_{y}&=& \begin{pmatrix} \alpha_{1} \\ \alpha_{2}\\ \alpha_{3} \\ \alpha_{4} \end{pmatrix}&&\begin{pmatrix} \beta_{1} \beta_{2} \beta_{3} \beta_{4} \end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix} y_{1} \\ y_{2}\\ y_{3} \\ y_{4} \end{pmatrix}=0\\ &=& \begin{pmatrix} \alpha_{1} \\ \alpha_{2}\\ \alpha_{3} \\ \alpha_{4} \end{pmatrix} &&\begin{pmatrix} \beta_{1}y_{1} + \beta_{2}y_{2} + \beta_{3}y_{3} + \beta_{4}y_{4} \end{pmatrix} = 0 \\ \Rightarrow&& \beta_{1}y_{1} + \beta_{2}y_{2} + \beta_{3}y_{3} + \beta_{4}y_{4} &&=0 \end{eqnarray}\]

1.2 (b)

A researcher uses the Johansen procedure and obtains the following test statistics (and critical values)

\(r\) \(\lambda_{max}\) 5% critical value
0 38.962 33.178
1 29.148 27.169
2 16.304 20.278
3 8.861 14.036
4 1.994 3.962

Determine the number of cointegrating vectors.

\(r\) The Null Hypothesis \(\lambda_{max}\) 5% critical value Result
0 \(H_{0}: r=0\ vs\ H_{1}: r \le 0\) 38.962 33.178 Reject \(H_{0}\)
1 \(H_{0}: r=1\ vs\ H_{1}: r \le 1\) 29.148 27.169 Reject \(H_{0}\)
2 \(H_{0}: r=2\ vs\ H_{1}: r \le 2\) 16.304 20.278 Do not reject \(H_{0}\)

Since the \(\lambda_{max}\) is less than the 5% critical value, the null hypothesis do not reject.

From the table above,

  • For \(r= 0\): \(\Rightarrow\) Reject null hypothesis (0 cointegrating vectors).

  • For \(r= 1\): \(\Rightarrow\) Reject null hypothesis (1 cointegrating vectors).

  • For \(r= 2\): \(\Rightarrow\) Do not reject null hypothesis \(\Rightarrow\) 2 cointegrating vectors.

Therefore, the number of cointegrating vectors are two.

2 Problem 6:

2.1 (b)

The researcher obtains results for the Johansen test using the variables outlined in part (a) of the question as follows:

\(r\) \(\lambda_{max}\) 5% critical value
0 38.65 30.26
1 26.91 23.84
2 10.67 17.72
3 8.55 10.71

Determine the number of cointegrating vectors, explaining your answer.

\(r\) The Null Hypothesis \(\lambda_{max}\) 5% critical value Result
0 \(H_{0}: r=0\ vs\ H_{1}: r \le 0\) 38.65 30.26 Reject \(H_{0}\)
1 \(H_{0}: r=1\ vs\ H_{1}: r \le 1\) 26.91 23.84 Reject \(H_{0}\)
2 \(H_{0}: r=2\ vs\ H_{1}: r \le 2\) 10.67 17.72 Do not reject \(H_{0}\)

Since the \(\lambda_{max}\) is less than the 5% critical value, the null hypothesis do not reject.

From the table above,

  • For \(r= 0\): \(\Rightarrow\) Reject null hypothesis (0 cointegrating vectors).

  • For \(r= 1\): \(\Rightarrow\) Reject null hypothesis (1 cointegrating vectors).

  • For \(r= 2\): \(\Rightarrow\) Do not reject null hypothesis \(\Rightarrow\) 2 cointegrating vectors.

Therefore, the number of cointegrating vectors are two.

3 Problem 7:

Compare and contrast the Engle–Granger and Johansen methodologies for testing for cointegration and modelling cointegrated systems. Which, in your view, represents the superior approach and why?

Feature/Aspect Engle–Granger Methodology Johansen Methodology
Approach Two-step procedure System-based maximum likelihood estimation
Steps Involved 1. Test for unit roots in individual series Estimate the entire system of equations
2. Test for cointegration in residuals from OLS regression
Cointegration Rank Assumes a single cointegrating relationship Can identify multiple cointegrating relationships
Error Correction Model Estimated in a second step Incorporated naturally in the Vector Error Correction Model (VECM)
Assumptions Assumes series are I(1) More flexible with fewer assumptions
Complexity Relatively simple and straightforward Computationally intensive and complex
Sample Size Requirements Suitable for smaller samples Requires larger sample sizes for reliability
Estimation Bias Potential bias in small samples Generally more robust in large samples
Testing Power Lower power, particularly in small samples Higher power due to system-wide testing
Software Implementation Widely available and easy to implement More specialized and requires advanced software
Practical Use More commonly used in simpler applications Preferred in more complex and comprehensive analyses