Homework Chapter 08
Research in Finance
1 Problem 5:
1.1 (a)
Briefly outline Johansen’s methodology for testing for cointegration between a set of variables in the context of a VAR.
A VAR with k lags containing these variables could be set up:
\[\begin{eqnarray} y_{t} &=& \beta_{1}y_{t-1} &+ \beta_{2}y_{t-2} &+...+&\beta_{k}y_{t-k}\\ g\times 1 && g\times g g\times 1&g\times g g\times 1&&g\times g g\times 1 \end{eqnarray}\]
Transform the VAR model into a Vector Error Correction Model (VECM) to incorporate potential long-run relationships.
\[\begin{eqnarray} \Delta y_{t} &=& (\beta_{1}-I)(y_{t-1}-y_{t-2})&+ (\beta_{1}+\beta_{2}+I)y_{t-2}&+...\\ &=& \Gamma_{1} \Delta y_{t-1} &+ \Gamma_{2} \Delta y_{t-2} &+...+ (\beta_{1}+\beta_{2}+..+\beta_{k}-I)y_{t-k} + u_{t} \end{eqnarray}\]
In the long run: \(t \to +\infty\): \(\Pi_{y}=0\)
\(\Rightarrow\) 0 is one eigenvalue of \(\Pi_{y}\)
\(\Rightarrow\ r=rank\ \Pi \le g-1\)
Johansen test \(r = rank \Pi = the\ number\ of\ cointegration\ relationship\)
\[H_{0}: r = 0\ vs\ H_{1}: r> 0\\ H_{0}: r = 1\ vs\ H_{1}: r> 1\]
From \(r = rank\ \Pi\): (\(r=1, g=4\))
\[\begin{eqnarray} \Pi &=& \alpha &\times& \beta'\\ g\times g && g\times r&& r \times g \\ \Rightarrow \Pi_{y}&=& \begin{pmatrix} \alpha_{1} \\ \alpha_{2}\\ \alpha_{3} \\ \alpha_{4} \end{pmatrix}&&\begin{pmatrix} \beta_{1} \beta_{2} \beta_{3} \beta_{4} \end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix} y_{1} \\ y_{2}\\ y_{3} \\ y_{4} \end{pmatrix}=0\\ &=& \begin{pmatrix} \alpha_{1} \\ \alpha_{2}\\ \alpha_{3} \\ \alpha_{4} \end{pmatrix} &&\begin{pmatrix} \beta_{1}y_{1} + \beta_{2}y_{2} + \beta_{3}y_{3} + \beta_{4}y_{4} \end{pmatrix} = 0 \\ \Rightarrow&& \beta_{1}y_{1} + \beta_{2}y_{2} + \beta_{3}y_{3} + \beta_{4}y_{4} &&=0 \end{eqnarray}\]
1.2 (b)
A researcher uses the Johansen procedure and obtains the following test statistics (and critical values)
| \(r\) | \(\lambda_{max}\) | 5% critical value |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | 38.962 | 33.178 |
| 1 | 29.148 | 27.169 |
| 2 | 16.304 | 20.278 |
| 3 | 8.861 | 14.036 |
| 4 | 1.994 | 3.962 |
Determine the number of cointegrating vectors.
| \(r\) | The Null Hypothesis | \(\lambda_{max}\) | 5% critical value | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | \(H_{0}: r=0\ vs\ H_{1}: r \le 0\) | 38.962 | 33.178 | Reject \(H_{0}\) |
| 1 | \(H_{0}: r=1\ vs\ H_{1}: r \le 1\) | 29.148 | 27.169 | Reject \(H_{0}\) |
| 2 | \(H_{0}: r=2\ vs\ H_{1}: r \le 2\) | 16.304 | 20.278 | Do not reject \(H_{0}\) |
Since the \(\lambda_{max}\) is less than the 5% critical value, the null hypothesis do not reject.
From the table above,
For \(r= 0\): \(\Rightarrow\) Reject null hypothesis (0 cointegrating vectors).
For \(r= 1\): \(\Rightarrow\) Reject null hypothesis (1 cointegrating vectors).
For \(r= 2\): \(\Rightarrow\) Do not reject null hypothesis \(\Rightarrow\) 2 cointegrating vectors.
Therefore, the number of cointegrating vectors are two.
2 Problem 6:
2.1 (b)
The researcher obtains results for the Johansen test using the variables outlined in part (a) of the question as follows:
| \(r\) | \(\lambda_{max}\) | 5% critical value |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | 38.65 | 30.26 |
| 1 | 26.91 | 23.84 |
| 2 | 10.67 | 17.72 |
| 3 | 8.55 | 10.71 |
Determine the number of cointegrating vectors, explaining your answer.
| \(r\) | The Null Hypothesis | \(\lambda_{max}\) | 5% critical value | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | \(H_{0}: r=0\ vs\ H_{1}: r \le 0\) | 38.65 | 30.26 | Reject \(H_{0}\) |
| 1 | \(H_{0}: r=1\ vs\ H_{1}: r \le 1\) | 26.91 | 23.84 | Reject \(H_{0}\) |
| 2 | \(H_{0}: r=2\ vs\ H_{1}: r \le 2\) | 10.67 | 17.72 | Do not reject \(H_{0}\) |
Since the \(\lambda_{max}\) is less than the 5% critical value, the null hypothesis do not reject.
From the table above,
For \(r= 0\): \(\Rightarrow\) Reject null hypothesis (0 cointegrating vectors).
For \(r= 1\): \(\Rightarrow\) Reject null hypothesis (1 cointegrating vectors).
For \(r= 2\): \(\Rightarrow\) Do not reject null hypothesis \(\Rightarrow\) 2 cointegrating vectors.
Therefore, the number of cointegrating vectors are two.
3 Problem 7:
Compare and contrast the Engle–Granger and Johansen methodologies for testing for cointegration and modelling cointegrated systems. Which, in your view, represents the superior approach and why?
| Feature/Aspect | Engle–Granger Methodology | Johansen Methodology |
|---|---|---|
| Approach | Two-step procedure | System-based maximum likelihood estimation |
| Steps Involved | 1. Test for unit roots in individual series | Estimate the entire system of equations |
| 2. Test for cointegration in residuals from OLS regression | ||
| Cointegration Rank | Assumes a single cointegrating relationship | Can identify multiple cointegrating relationships |
| Error Correction Model | Estimated in a second step | Incorporated naturally in the Vector Error Correction Model (VECM) |
| Assumptions | Assumes series are I(1) | More flexible with fewer assumptions |
| Complexity | Relatively simple and straightforward | Computationally intensive and complex |
| Sample Size Requirements | Suitable for smaller samples | Requires larger sample sizes for reliability |
| Estimation Bias | Potential bias in small samples | Generally more robust in large samples |
| Testing Power | Lower power, particularly in small samples | Higher power due to system-wide testing |
| Software Implementation | Widely available and easy to implement | More specialized and requires advanced software |
| Practical Use | More commonly used in simpler applications | Preferred in more complex and comprehensive analyses |