N Parameters

Author

Andrew

We are attempting to answer the question: What will be the causal effect of postcards on voting in the 2026 Texas election? The data source is voting data from Michigan in 2006. While the data source is from Michigan the question we have is for Texas. We made a Gaussian model. People who have been voting in the past are more likely to vote again.

\[y_{i} = \beta_{0} + \beta_{1} age\_z + \beta_{2}male_i + \beta_{3}civic\_duty_i + \\ \beta_{4}hawthorne_i + \beta_{5}self_i + \beta_{6}neighbors_i + \\ \beta_{7}Sometimes\ vote_i + \beta_{8}Always\ vote_i + \\ \beta_{9}civic\_duty_i Sometimes\ vote_i + \beta_{10}hawthorne_i Sometimes\ vote_i + \\ \beta_{11}self_i Sometimes\ vote_i + \beta_{11}neighbors_i Sometimes\ vote_i + \\ \beta_{12}civic\_duty_i Always\ vote_i + \beta_{13}hawthorne_i Always\ vote_i + \\ \beta_{14}self_i Always\ vote_i + \beta_{15}neighbors_i Always\ vote_i + \epsilon_{i}\]

Warning in tidy.brmsfit(x, ..., effects = "fixed"): some parameter names
contain underscores: term naming may be unreliable!

Characteristic

Beta

95% CI

1
(Intercept) 0.156 0.137, 0.174
age_z 0.036 0.031, 0.042
sex

    sexMale 0.004 -0.005, 0.014
treatment

    No Postcard
    treatmentCivicDuty 0.016 -0.028, 0.058
    Hawthorne 0.004 -0.036, 0.046
    Self -0.007 -0.047, 0.037
    Neighbors 0.084 0.042, 0.126
voter_class

    Rarely Vote
    voter_classSometimesVote 0.114 0.094, 0.134
    voter_classAlwaysVote 0.298 0.276, 0.320
treatment * voter_class

    treatmentCivicDuty * voter_classSometimesVote -0.004 -0.052, 0.044
    Hawthorne * voter_classSometimesVote 0.010 -0.036, 0.055
    Self * voter_classSometimesVote 0.059 0.012, 0.104
    Neighbors * voter_classSometimesVote -0.009 -0.055, 0.036
    treatmentCivicDuty * voter_classAlwaysVote -0.009 -0.063, 0.046
    Hawthorne * voter_classAlwaysVote 0.035 -0.017, 0.085
    Self * voter_classAlwaysVote 0.047 -0.006, 0.099
    Neighbors * voter_classAlwaysVote -0.002 -0.054, 0.052
1

CI = Credible Interval