Section

Other anlayses

Weight trajectory

Definitely different

## `geom_smooth()` using formula = 'y ~ s(x, bs = "cs")'
## `geom_smooth()` using formula = 'y ~ s(x, bs = "cs")'

## Loading required package: nlme
## 
## Attaching package: 'nlme'
## 
## The following object is masked from 'package:IRanges':
## 
##     collapse
## 
## The following object is masked from 'package:dplyr':
## 
##     collapse
## 
## The following object is masked from 'package:lme4':
## 
##     lmList
## 
## This is mgcv 1.9-1. For overview type 'help("mgcv-package")'.
Sex Genotype p
Males Tp53 1.18e-05
Females Tp53 0.00e+00
Males WT 3.00e-07
Females WT 0.00e+00

Lean Trajectory

Belive it or not, a little different

Sex Genotype p
Males Tp53 0.0138988
Females Tp53 0.0004708
Males WT 0.0032615
Females WT 0.0000000

Fat Trajectory

Very different

Sex Genotype p
Males Tp53 0
Females Tp53 0
Males WT 0
Females WT 0

Prevalence

We want to know if prevalence of cancer differs between HFD and NC. Not enough evidence of a difference and not enough evidence to establish equivalence.

Female: diet differenc by Genotypes
contrast genotype estimate SE df z.ratio p.value
HFD - NC Tp53 0.0640029 0.5883106 Inf 0.1087910 0.9133683
HFD - NC WT -1.6094379 2.1447611 Inf -0.7504043 0.4530112
Female: Genotype difference by diet
contrast diet estimate SE df z.ratio p.value
Tp53 - WT HFD 1.2602536 1.066926 Inf 1.1812007 0.2375230
Tp53 - WT NC -0.4131872 1.951353 Inf -0.2117439 0.8323068
##                        2.5 %    97.5 %
## (Intercept)        0.5312869 1.9892203
## dietNC            -1.2170704 1.0890647
## genotypeWT        -3.3513900 0.8308827
## dietNC:genotypeWT -2.6854897 6.0323713
Male: diet differenc by Genotypes
contrast genotype estimate SE df z.ratio p.value
HFD - NC Tp53 0.4161604 0.7592179 Inf 0.5481436 0.5835933
HFD - NC WT 0.2513144 1.2445011 Inf 0.2019399 0.8399637
Male: Genotype difference by diet
contrast diet estimate SE df z.ratio p.value
Tp53 - WT HFD 1.0651364 1.000254 Inf 1.064866 0.2869366
Tp53 - WT NC 0.9002904 1.060513 Inf 0.848920 0.3959258
##                        2.5 %    97.5 %
## (Intercept)        0.6258908 2.6799552
## dietNC            -1.9042001 1.0718793
## genotypeWT        -3.0255980 0.8953252
## dietNC:genotypeWT -2.6923989 3.0220909
##                        2.5 %    97.5 %
## (Intercept)        0.8335106 2.0295913
## dietNC            -1.1015791 0.7303512
## genotypeWT        -2.4590927 0.3314403
## dietNC:genotypeWT -1.6257890 2.8384821

Burden

Not enough evidence of a difference and not enough evidence to establish equivalence.

Female: diet differences
contrast genotype estimate SE df t.ratio p.value
HFD - NC Tp53 7.76455 4.493877 71 1.7278066 0.0883704
HFD - NC WT 11.12500 15.777340 71 0.7051252 0.4830392
Female: genotype differences
contrast diet estimate SE df t.ratio p.value
Tp53 - WT HFD 5.398809 9.532953 71 0.5663313 0.5729544
Tp53 - WT NC 8.759259 13.350738 71 0.6560880 0.5138881
##                       2.5 %    97.5 %
## (Intercept)        35.91861 47.129012
## genotypeWT        -24.40698 13.609358
## dietNC            -16.72509  1.195986
## genotypeWT:dietNC -36.07081 29.349910
Male: diet differences
contrast genotype estimate SE df t.ratio p.value
HFD - NC Tp53 3.558479 4.668739 53 0.7621928 0.4493237
HFD - NC WT -2.483333 9.440937 53 -0.2630389 0.7935405
Male: genotype differences
contrast diet estimate SE df t.ratio p.value
Tp53 - WT HFD 13.694444 7.036859 53 1.9461019 0.0569529
Tp53 - WT NC 7.652632 7.836519 53 0.9765346 0.3332360
##                       2.5 %     97.5 %
## (Intercept)        26.59282 38.6294055
## genotypeWT        -27.80860  0.4197069
## dietNC            -12.92278  5.8058252
## genotypeWT:dietNC -15.08322 27.1668427

Malignancy

Female: diet differenc by Genotypes
contrast genotype estimate SE df z.ratio p.value
HFD - NC Tp53 0.00000 0.309461 Inf 0.000000 1.0000000
HFD - NC WT 1.94591 1.927248 Inf 1.009683 0.3126471
Female: Genotype difference by diet
contrast diet estimate SE df z.ratio p.value
Tp53 - WT HFD -1.94591 1.7546704 Inf -1.108989 0.267435
Tp53 - WT NC 0.00000 0.8550923 Inf 0.000000 1.000000
##                        2.5 %    97.5 %
## (Intercept)       -0.3464760 0.3464760
## dietNC            -0.6065325 0.6065325
## genotypeWT        -1.4931810 5.3850005
## dietNC:genotypeWT -5.7716324 1.8798129
Male: diet differenc by Genotypes
contrast genotype estimate SE df z.ratio p.value
HFD - NC Tp53 0 0.3382603 Inf 0 1
HFD - NC WT 0 0.7559289 Inf 0 1
Male: Genotype difference by diet
contrast diet estimate SE df z.ratio p.value
Tp53 - WT HFD 0 0.5754727 Inf 0 1
Tp53 - WT NC 0 0.5955500 Inf 0 1
##                        2.5 %    97.5 %
## (Intercept)       -0.4178657 0.4178657
## dietNC            -0.6629781 0.6629781
## genotypeWT        -1.1279058 1.1279058
## dietNC:genotypeWT -1.6231634 1.6231634

Survival

No Diet differences and not enough evidence of equivalence

## Loading required package: ggpubr
## 
## Attaching package: 'survminer'
## The following object is masked from 'package:survival':
## 
##     myeloma

## Call:
## coxph(formula = Surv(time = age_sacrifice, event = status) ~ 
##     diet + sex, data = surv[surv$genotype == "Tp53", ])
## 
##   n= 173, number of events= 92 
## 
##            coef exp(coef) se(coef)      z Pr(>|z|)
## dietNC -0.02173   0.97850  0.21388 -0.102    0.919
## sexM   -0.15480   0.85659  0.21204 -0.730    0.465
## 
##        exp(coef) exp(-coef) lower .95 upper .95
## dietNC    0.9785      1.022    0.6434     1.488
## sexM      0.8566      1.167    0.5653     1.298
## 
## Concordance= 0.497  (se = 0.031 )
## Likelihood ratio test= 0.55  on 2 df,   p=0.8
## Wald test            = 0.54  on 2 df,   p=0.8
## Score (logrank) test = 0.54  on 2 df,   p=0.8
## Call:
## coxph(formula = Surv(time = age_sacrifice, event = status) ~ 
##     diet, data = surv[surv$genotype == "WT" & surv$sex == "M", 
##     ])
## 
##   n= 23, number of events= 7 
## 
##          coef exp(coef) se(coef)     z Pr(>|z|)
## dietNC 0.3346    1.3974   0.7652 0.437    0.662
## 
##        exp(coef) exp(-coef) lower .95 upper .95
## dietNC     1.397     0.7156    0.3119     6.261
## 
## Concordance= 0.573  (se = 0.101 )
## Likelihood ratio test= 0.19  on 1 df,   p=0.7
## Wald test            = 0.19  on 1 df,   p=0.7
## Score (logrank) test = 0.19  on 1 df,   p=0.7
## New names:
## New names:
## • `weight_14w` -> `weight_14w...58`
## • `weight_54w` -> `weight_54w...91`
## • `weight_56w` -> `weight_56w...92`
## • `weight_58w` -> `weight_58w...93`
## • `weight_62w` -> `weight_62w...97`
## • `weight_64w` -> `weight_64w...98`
## • `weight_66w` -> `weight_66w...99`
## • `weight_68w` -> `weight_68w...100`
## • `weight_14w` -> `weight_14w...136`
## • `weight_54w` -> `weight_54w...187`
## • `weight_56w` -> `weight_56w...193`
## • `weight_58w` -> `weight_58w...199`
## • `weight_62w` -> `weight_62w...208`
## • `weight_64w` -> `weight_64w...214`
## • `weight_66w` -> `weight_66w...220`
## • `weight_68w` -> `weight_68w...226`

Compounds

Missingness

Males

Females

Survival corrs

Pooled: Compounds with evidence of Survival impact
Compund coef exp.coef. se.coef. z Pr…z.. FDR Lower Upper sgpv
C30pos: -0.4838477 0.6164071 0.1729910 -2.796953 0.0051587 0.9992651 -0.8229102 -0.1447853 0
T3pos: -0.2957942 0.7439405 0.0936713 -3.157790 0.0015897 0.9992651 -0.4793900 -0.1121985 0
T3pos: -0.4247455 0.6539362 0.1507079 -2.818336 0.0048273 0.9992651 -0.7201330 -0.1293581 0
T3pos: -0.7561469 0.4694719 0.2489805 -3.036973 0.0023897 0.9992651 -1.2441486 -0.2681452 0
T3pos: -0.4965025 0.6086557 0.1498272 -3.313834 0.0009203 0.9992651 -0.7901637 -0.2028412 0
## `geom_smooth()` using formula = 'y ~ x'

Males: Compounds with evidence of Survival impact
Compund coef exp.coef. se.coef. z Pr…z.. FDR Lower Upper sgpv
C18neg: -0.3916688 0.6759279 0.1135916 -3.448043 0.0005647 0.9064277 -0.6143084 -0.1690292 0
C18neg: 0.3821763 1.4654704 0.1188226 3.216361 0.0012983 0.9064277 0.1492841 0.6150685 0
C30pos: 1.1434454 3.1375600 0.5195804 2.200709 0.0277566 0.9064277 0.1250678 2.1618230 0
C30pos: -0.7952090 0.4514868 0.2304766 -3.450281 0.0005600 0.9064277 -1.2469432 -0.3434749 0
C30pos: -0.8491183 0.4277920 0.3190392 -2.661486 0.0077797 0.9064277 -1.4744351 -0.2238014 0
C30pos: -0.5263273 0.5907707 0.1992225 -2.641906 0.0082441 0.9064277 -0.9168034 -0.1358511 0
C30pos: -0.4712506 0.6242212 0.1513247 -3.114168 0.0018446 0.9064277 -0.7678470 -0.1746541 0
C30pos: -0.4593693 0.6316819 0.1653925 -2.777449 0.0054787 0.9064277 -0.7835387 -0.1352000 0
C30pos: -0.4264444 0.6528262 0.1478559 -2.884190 0.0039242 0.9064277 -0.7162419 -0.1366469 0
C30pos: -0.2856603 0.7515179 0.0847733 -3.369697 0.0007525 0.9064277 -0.4518159 -0.1195046 0
C30pos: 0.5924928 1.8084909 0.2492729 2.376884 0.0174596 0.9064277 0.1039178 1.0810677 0
C30pos: 0.4075811 1.5031773 0.1569389 2.597069 0.0094023 0.9064277 0.0999809 0.7151812 0
C30pos: 0.3017546 1.3522293 0.1041577 2.897092 0.0037664 0.9064277 0.0976054 0.5059037 0
PHneg: 0.3386821 1.4030973 0.1103918 3.068002 0.0021550 0.9064277 0.1223143 0.5550500 0
PHneg: 0.4688826 1.5982074 0.1483278 3.161125 0.0015716 0.9064277 0.1781602 0.7596050 0
T3pos: -0.4246275 0.6540134 0.1594045 -2.663837 0.0077255 0.9064277 -0.7370603 -0.1121947 0
T3pos: -0.4346755 0.6474747 0.1636587 -2.655988 0.0079077 0.9064277 -0.7554466 -0.1139044 0
T3pos: -0.4398274 0.6441476 0.1599617 -2.749579 0.0059672 0.9064277 -0.7533524 -0.1263024 0
T3pos: -0.4678968 0.6263182 0.1784110 -2.622579 0.0087267 0.9064277 -0.8175823 -0.1182113 0
T3pos: -0.7642262 0.4656942 0.3100673 -2.464710 0.0137124 0.9064277 -1.3719582 -0.1564942 0
T3pos: -0.5762843 0.5619827 0.2206905 -2.611278 0.0090205 0.9064277 -1.0088377 -0.1437308 0
Females: Compounds with evidence of Survival impact
Compund coef exp.coef. se.coef. z Pr…z.. FDR Lower Upper sgpv
C18neg: -0.7872114 4.551122e-01 0.2764460 -2.847613 0.0044048 0.8298124 -1.3290456 -0.2453771 0
C18neg: 0.4179887 1.518904e+00 0.1573613 2.656237 0.0079018 0.8298124 0.1095607 0.7264168 0
C18neg: 0.3976324 1.488297e+00 0.1422653 2.795007 0.0051899 0.8298124 0.1187924 0.6764724 0
C18neg: 0.4076786 1.503324e+00 0.1569418 2.597642 0.0093866 0.8298124 0.1000727 0.7152844 0
C30pos: -0.5739910 5.632729e-01 0.2296501 -2.499415 0.0124398 0.8298124 -1.0241053 -0.1238768 0
C30pos: -0.6692993 5.120673e-01 0.2683050 -2.494547 0.0126118 0.8298124 -1.1951770 -0.1434215 0
C30pos: 1.2309357 3.424432e+00 0.5506128 2.235574 0.0253797 0.8298124 0.1517345 2.3101369 0
C30pos: 0.7152617 2.044722e+00 0.3091365 2.313741 0.0206819 0.8298124 0.1093543 1.3211692 0
C30pos: 0.2951851 1.343375e+00 0.0834102 3.538959 0.0004017 0.8298124 0.1317012 0.4586690 0
C30pos: -0.3279674 7.203865e-01 0.1099157 -2.983810 0.0028468 0.8298124 -0.5434021 -0.1125327 0
C30pos: -0.9048658 4.045962e-01 0.3426837 -2.640528 0.0082777 0.8298124 -1.5765259 -0.2332057 0
C30pos: 0.3375829 1.401556e+00 0.1052583 3.207185 0.0013404 0.8298124 0.1312766 0.5438892 0
C30pos: -0.3576799 6.992969e-01 0.1048384 -3.411726 0.0006455 0.8298124 -0.5631631 -0.1521966 0
C30pos: -0.3807137 6.833735e-01 0.1370067 -2.778797 0.0054561 0.8298124 -0.6492468 -0.1121806 0
PHneg: -0.5598646 5.712864e-01 0.2127538 -2.631514 0.0085005 0.8298124 -0.9768621 -0.1428671 0
PHneg: 0.7266062 2.068050e+00 0.2954054 2.459691 0.0139057 0.8298124 0.1476115 1.3056009 0
PHneg: -0.4606992 6.308424e-01 0.1731253 -2.661074 0.0077892 0.8298124 -0.8000249 -0.1213736 0
PHneg: 11.9188422 1.500678e+05 5.7629936 2.068169 0.0386242 0.8298124 0.6233747 23.2143097 0
T3pos: 0.3713545 1.449697e+00 0.1254828 2.959405 0.0030823 0.8298124 0.1254082 0.6173008 0
T3pos: -0.5728418 5.639206e-01 0.1975014 -2.900444 0.0037263 0.8298124 -0.9599446 -0.1857391 0

Burden Corrs

Compounds with evidence of burden impact
Compund Estimate Std..Error t.value Pr…t.. FDR Lower Upper sgpv

limma

## 
## Attaching package: 'limma'
## The following object is masked from 'package:BiocGenerics':
## 
##     plotMA

8 Weeks

Males

Females

Pooled

16 Weeks

Males

Females

Pooled

40 Weeks

Males

Females

Pooled