TEDD Baseline


Both groups: n = 20



AD: n = 8



DLB: n = 11






Counts vs. LSNS


Higher LSNS = more engagement



Counts vs. UCLA


Lower UCLA = less loneliness



Counts vs. MoCA


Higher MoCA = better cognition





Counts vs. UPDRS


Lower UPDRS = less disability




All correlations


Total sample


counts vs. LSNS (n = 19): -0.3667281 (-0.7037181, 0.1049655)
counts vs. MoCA (n = 20): -0.4079326 (-0.72040655, 0.04220743)
counts vs. UCLA (n = 20): 0.1056492 (-0.3533934, 0.5236866)
counts vs. UPDRS (n = 17): -0.6552919 (-0.8638547, -0.2549455)




AD group


counts vs. LSNS (n = 9): -0.6857414 (-0.92747595, -0.03969942)
counts vs. MoCA (n = 9): -0.05372732 (-0.6931176, 0.6329801)
counts vs. UCLA (n = 9): -0.2826123 (-0.7971228, 0.4696593)
counts vs. UPDRS (n = 7): 0.5342235 (-0.3661287, 0.9179779)



DLB group


counts vs. LSNS (n = 10): -0.2372741 (-0.7542239, 0.4612620)
counts vs. MoCA (n = 11): -0.0007708472 (-0.6003682, 0.5993813)
counts vs. UCLA (n = 11): 0.3041522 (-0.3617198, 0.7645352)
counts vs. UPDRS (n = 10): -0.6254534 (-0.900472068, 0.006883768)