Alternative Ha: Legolas and Aragorn actors have different
heights
t.test(legolas,aragorn, alternative="two.sided")
##
## Welch Two Sample t-test
##
## data: legolas and aragorn
## t = 6.2088, df = 88.384, p-value = 1.694e-08
## alternative hypothesis: true difference in means is not equal to 0
## 95 percent confidence interval:
## 10.38971 20.17087
## sample estimates:
## mean of x mean of y
## 194.3023 179.0220
T-test of Legolas and Gimli actors
Null H0: Legolas and Gimli actors have the same height
Alternative Ha: Legolas and Gimli actors have different heights
t.test(legolas,gimli, alternative="two.sided")
##
## Welch Two Sample t-test
##
## data: legolas and gimli
## t = 21.931, df = 97.977, p-value < 2.2e-16
## alternative hypothesis: true difference in means is not equal to 0
## 95 percent confidence interval:
## 56.18058 67.35916
## sample estimates:
## mean of x mean of y
## 194.3023 132.5324
The low p-value (p-value = < 2.2e-16) means we can reject our
null hypothesis, suggesting that the difference in heights between
Legolas and Gimli actors is statistically significant
Step two: Re-run the variance test (F-test) to compare the group of
Gimli and Legolas actors. Do these groups have different variance?
var.test(gimli,legolas)
##
## F test to compare two variances
##
## data: gimli and legolas
## F = 0.9697, num df = 49, denom df = 49, p-value = 0.9147
## alternative hypothesis: true ratio of variances is not equal to 1
## 95 percent confidence interval:
## 0.5502824 1.7087965
## sample estimates:
## ratio of variances
## 0.9697013
Comparing Gimli and Legolas actor heights using an F-test returned a
p-value above 0.05 (p-value = 0.8395), which suggest there is not
statistically significant difference in variance
Using a correlation test comparing Sepal Length and Sepal Width for
the setosa species, the p-value is below 0.05 (p-value = 6.71e-10),
which suggests there is statistically significant difference
versicolor_cor_test <- cor.test(iris[iris$Species == "versicolor", "Sepal.Length"],
iris[iris$Species == "versicolor", "Sepal.Width"])
versicolor_cor_test
##
## Pearson's product-moment correlation
##
## data: iris[iris$Species == "versicolor", "Sepal.Length"] and iris[iris$Species == "versicolor", "Sepal.Width"]
## t = 4.2839, df = 48, p-value = 8.772e-05
## alternative hypothesis: true correlation is not equal to 0
## 95 percent confidence interval:
## 0.2900175 0.7015599
## sample estimates:
## cor
## 0.5259107
For the versicolor species, p-value is below 0.05 (p-value =
8.772e-05), which suggests there is statistically significant
difference
virginica_cor_test <- cor.test(iris[iris$Species == "virginica", "Sepal.Length"],
iris[iris$Species == "virginica", "Sepal.Width"])
virginica_cor_test
##
## Pearson's product-moment correlation
##
## data: iris[iris$Species == "virginica", "Sepal.Length"] and iris[iris$Species == "virginica", "Sepal.Width"]
## t = 3.5619, df = 48, p-value = 0.0008435
## alternative hypothesis: true correlation is not equal to 0
## 95 percent confidence interval:
## 0.2049657 0.6525292
## sample estimates:
## cor
## 0.4572278
For the virginica species, p-value is below 0.05 (p-value =
0.0008435), which suggests there is statistically significant
difference
Step four: Using the deer dataset and the chisq.test() function,
test:
- If there are significant differences in the number of deer caught
per month
deer <- read.csv("Deer.csv")
deer_caught_per_month <- table(deer$Month)
chisq.test(deer_caught_per_month)
##
## Chi-squared test for given probabilities
##
## data: deer_caught_per_month
## X-squared = 997.07, df = 11, p-value < 2.2e-16
The p-value is below 0.05 (p-value = < 2.2e-16), which suggests
there is statistically significant difference in the number of deer
caught per month
- If the cases of tuberculosis are uniformly distributed across all
farms
deer_tbcounts_per_farm <- table(deer$Farm[deer$Tb == 1])
chisq.test(deer_tbcounts_per_farm)
##
## Chi-squared test for given probabilities
##
## data: deer_tbcounts_per_farm
## X-squared = 189.78, df = 17, p-value < 2.2e-16
The p-value is below 0.05 (p-value = < 2.2e-16), which suggests
there is statistically significant difference in the tuberculosis counts
across all farms, which means the cases are not uniformly distributed
across all farms