PSYC121 - Developing Self Control (Part II)

Victoria University of Wellington

Reminder: Lecturer Evaluations for my lectures are now open on Nuku!

Lecture Objectives

  1. Discuss the findings from the Dunedin Multidisciplinary Study

  2. Introduce “The Marshmallow Test”

    1. Children’s Strategies for success (which ones work better than others)
  3. Factors that contribute to EF development

    1. Environmental Factors

    2. Culture

Dunedin Multidisciplinary Health & Development Study

Dunedin Multidisciplinary Health & Development Study

  • Research Question: Does EF during childhood predict health/behaviour/well-being outcomes in adulthood?

  • Longitudinal Study:

    • The same participants are measured at multiple points during their lives (1972 - 2005)
  • Researchers followed ~1,000 children from birth to 32 years

  • Needed to get all of these ~1,000 people to come back into the lab to complete battery of EF tasks and interviews at multiple specific times!

EF & Health

EF & Wealth

EF & Crime

Development of EF

  • From reflexes in infancy to flexible mature control of behaviour in adulthood
  • Not so much individual difference in infants, but lots of individual difference in adults
  • EFs take a while to develop, and are not unified in their development
  • Major advances in preschool years
  • Adolescence is another period of major EF development

Example of Development of EF: Working Memory

  • Measure/Task: Verbatim digit span

    • Tests what the longest sequence of random numbers a person can repeat in the exact order they heard them
  • Findings: Performance increases with age:

    Age Typical task performance
    2.5 years 2 numbers
    7 years 4 - 5 numbers
    early adulthood (20 years) 6 - 7 numbers

Development of Emotion Regulation (Adolescence)

Children’s Decisions Making: Saying no to the marshmallow

  • Delay of Gratification

Children’s Decisions Making: Saying no to the marshmallow

  • Walter Mischel (1930 - 2018)
  • Stanford Marshmallow Experiments (1960s)
  • Task: If child can resist a smaller but immediate reward they will receive a larger reward later
  • “You can eat 1 marshmallow now or you can have 2 marshmallows if you wait”

Environmental Reliability & Delay of Gratificaton

Delay of Gratification

  • ~30% of 4-year-olds ate the marshmallow within seconds
  • ~30% held out for 15 minutes
  • The 4-year-olds who delayed were also better at concentrating
  • & better at coping with frustration and stress
  • & better cognitive and social competence ratings
  • At age 18, delayers had earned higher grades
  • & exhibited fewer behavioural problems

Strategies on the Marshmallow Test

  • Attentional Disengagement (look away, close eyes)
  • Mental Distraction (think about something else)
  • Distancing

Distancing

  • mentally trying to distance oneself from the temptation by focusing on things that are unrelated to the temptation, or imagining a future context when they are no longer being tempted.

  • When children were taught to pretend the marshmallow was surrounded by a picture frame, waiting time increased from 60 seconds to 15 minutes!

What Factors Affect Development of EF?

  • Brain Maturing
  • Culture
  • Parenting (Modeling Behaviours)
  • Environmental Contingencies

Parental Influences

  • Self-control more likely when parents model self-control in their own behaviour
  • Children from strict households demonstrate less self control!
    • Why?
    • Children need opportunities to regulate their own behavior in order to develop self control!
    • Strict household = removing the choice from the child = fewer opportunities to make decision to use self control!

Environmental Contingencies

  • Reliable vs. Unreliable Environment Conditions
  • Unreliable Condition = after waiting for new set of art supplies (instead of using the old cruddy art supplies), the children are told that “we don’t have the new art supplies after all”

Environmental Contingencies

  • 4-year-olds wait much longer in the Reliable Condition
  • Not simply a matter of self control

Cultural influences on EF development (China & USA)

Sabbagh et al (2006)

Cultural influences on EF development (Western & Māori)

  • Kaupapa Māori (Māori lifestyle, or ‘ways of doing things’) is vastly different to western (European/American) ways of life.

    • Western cultures = Individualism (ambition, autonomy, achievement, success)

    • Māori = Collectivism (responsibility, connection, duty, protection, preservation, memory)

  • Tikanga (Māori-specific behavioural guidelines for living and interacting with others) influences the development of certain cognitive skills in tamariki (children).

    • In western societies, memory is preserved through writing. Information is preserved materially

      • does not need to be preserved in actual human memory, so long as the transcription is not destroyed.
    • However, Māori preserve memory through intergenerational oral tranmission: passing down stories about one’s whakapapa (genealogy, family ‘tree’) or important events like a tangi (funeral) using spoken language.

    • To preserve memory in this way, all members of the whānau (Māori families/community) have a collective responsibility to pass along these memories to tamariki (children).

    • Memory preservation is also strengthened through the use of:

      • repetition: exposure to information multiple times

      • elaboration: connecting new details, or new perspectives, on each retelling.

    • Tamariki are exposed to stories multiple times in multiple formats:

      • waiata (song or poem), haka (dance, war chant), karakia (prayer or incantation), or kōrero (conversation, discourse).

      • Repetition (in different formats, from different people’s perspectives) serves to reinforce (strengthen)the memory, helping to ensure that it can be recalled and passed down to the next generation.

Cultural influences on EF development

  • This practice of transmitting memory orally in the whānau shapes the executive functions of tamariki in ways that research is only just beginning to uncover.
  • One researcher who is leading the investigation into this very question is Dr. Tia Neha (who is also creating this week’s module about this topic!)

Nga Mihi Nui