Victoria University of Wellington
Evolutionary rationale for attachment in babies (both human and non-human animals)
Lorenz’s research into imprinting
Harlow’s Rhesus Monkeys (Feeding vs. Social Needs Hypotheses)
Formation of human attachment
What attachment actually looks like in human behaviour
Individual differences in attachment (attachment styles)
How Attachment plays into emotional well-being later in life
Going to be talking about the effect that our parents/caregivers have on people during infancy and childhood, including what happens when a parent or caregiver is not a source of comfort, and may even be a source of fear or anxiety.
According to research, ~30% of you may find that some of this content will sound upsettingly familiar to you.
For those people, I offer the following three reminders:
You are not doomed by the kind of attachment you formed early in life. Attachment changes throughout the entire lifespan as you enter into relationships with different kinds of people.
You are in good company.
The only way to fight against these upsetting realities is by recognizing that they are happening (in our own experiences, and in others’ experiences). So, even if it is unpleasant, we must strive to see it and understand it.
Nature vs. Nurture
Universal vs. Individual Differences
Continuous vs. Discontinuous
| Phase | Behaviour | Age |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Baby does not discriminate among people | 0 - 2 Months |
| 2 | baby begins to prefer familiar people; beginning of ‘stranger anxiety’ | 2 - 7 months |
| 3 | developed attachment to primary caregiver; beginning of ‘separation anxiety’ | 7 - 24 months |
| 4 | reciprocal relationship - child feels secure over prolonged separations | 24 months onward |
Evolutionary-Biological Perspective
Bowlby theorized that attachment:
is an all-or-nothing process
is carried out by an innate behavioural system
Goal of infants’ attachment behaviours is to get closer to caregiver
The closer they can get to the caregiver, the greater their access to food & comfort.
Attachment behaviour is all about distress
Separation Distress
Different Greeting Reactions (open toward caregiver, closed toward stranger)
‘Secure base’ behaviour
Universal characteristics:
Individual Differences:
All brains (even a baby’s brain) are constantly making predictions
Over time, infant is developing expectations about the parent’s behaviour
How quickly do they respond to the infant’s needs
How likely they are to ignore the infant
How likely they are to respond with anger
How likely the parent is to be unpredictable
According to Cognitive Developmental Psychologists, those expectations create an internal working model in the mind of the infant.
But this internal working model is not only applied to the infants’ expectations about that caregiver
Instead, infants generalize their expectation to form general expectations about how relationships work (“this is how I should act”, “this is how others will act”)
This generalizing is an example of Inductive reasoning:
Ainsworth hypothesized that infants who are securely attached to their caregiver experience distress when they are separated from the caregiver, and will attempt to alleviate their distress by crying (i.e., communicating their needs to the caregiver).
4 specific predicted behaviours signalling secure attachment in the Strange Situation procedure:
They should seek to be near their caregiver whenever possible
They should show distress when they are separated from the caregiver
They should not be soothed by the stranger, when the caregiver is away
They should be soothed when the parent returns
They should orient their actions more toward the caregiver when they are present
Insecure avoidant attachment
Insecure resistant attachment
Disorganized attachment (rare)
Incoherent or bizarre behaviour
Typically associated with maltreatment of the infant, or may indicate presence of a developmental disorder
Consistently sensitive/responsive to infant’s needs = secure
Consistently insensitive/unresponsive to the infant’s needs = insecure avoidant
Inconsistently sensitive/responsive to the infant’s needs = insecure resistant
Unsafe (frightening or frightened) = insecure disorganized
Securely attached: higher self confidence, self esteem, social competence, better able to cope with challenges, greater sense of curiosity, better relationships with their peers and adults
Insecure avoidant: lower on above dimensions, more likely to:
prioritize independence and self-sufficiency instead of former close relationships
have difficulty with intimacy and emotional expression
have difficulties with commitment in intimate relationships
experience toxic or abusive relationships
Insecure resistant: lower on above dimensions, more likely to:
develop dependency
have difficulty trusting others
be preoccupied with concerns of abandonment
have a fear of intimacy
be extremely sensitive to perceived rejection
have difficulties resolving conflict
have difficulties with self-esteem
need assurance and validation from others
Disorganized: more likely to dissociate, struggle with managing emotions, very disrupted by other people’s emotions.
Attachment is equally important in romantic relationships in adulthood
Vulnerability is the heart of all intimate relationships
Vulnerability requires Trust
Trust requires Security
Attachment is intertwined with distress
Childhood attachment affects adult attachment
Attachment styles vary
Attachment can change throughout the lifespan
Attachment is the key to intimacy