PSYC121 Developmental Psychology - Part II

Victoria University of Wellington

Recap on Monday’s lecture

  1. Evolutionary rationale for attachment in babies (both human and non-human animals)

  2. Lorenz’s research into imprinting

  3. Harlow’s Rhesus Monkeys (Feeding vs. Social Needs Hypotheses)

Quick clarification about Harlow’s Findings

Today’s Lecture Objectives

  1. Formation of human attachment

  2. What attachment actually looks like in human behaviour

  3. Individual differences in attachment (attachment styles)

  4. How Attachment plays into emotional well-being later in life

A quick heads-up about today’s content:

  • Going to be talking about the effect that our parents/caregivers have on people during infancy and childhood, including what happens when a parent or caregiver is not a source of comfort, and may even be a source of fear or anxiety.

  • According to research, ~30% of you may find that some of this content will sound upsettingly familiar to you.

  • For those people, I offer the following three reminders:

    • You are not doomed by the kind of attachment you formed early in life. Attachment changes throughout the entire lifespan as you enter into relationships with different kinds of people.

    • You are in good company.

    • The only way to fight against these upsetting realities is by recognizing that they are happening (in our own experiences, and in others’ experiences). So, even if it is unpleasant, we must strive to see it and understand it.

Dichotomies in Attachment

  1. Nature vs. Nurture

  2. Universal vs. Individual Differences

  3. Continuous vs. Discontinuous

Formation of Human Attachment (first 2 years of life)

Phase Behaviour Age
1 Baby does not discriminate among people 0 - 2 Months
2 baby begins to prefer familiar people; beginning of ‘stranger anxiety’ 2 - 7 months
3 developed attachment to primary caregiver; beginning of ‘separation anxiety’ 7 - 24 months
4 reciprocal relationship - child feels secure over prolonged separations 24 months onward

John Bowlby (1908 - 1990)

Bowlby’s Theory of Attachment

  • Evolutionary-Biological Perspective

  • Bowlby theorized that attachment:

    • is an all-or-nothing process

    • is carried out by an innate behavioural system

    • Goal of infants’ attachment behaviours is to get closer to caregiver

  • The closer they can get to the caregiver, the greater their access to food & comfort.

What does attachment behaviour look like

  1. Attachment behaviour is all about distress

    1. Separation Distress

    2. Different Greeting Reactions (open toward caregiver, closed toward stranger)

  2. ‘Secure base’ behaviour

    1. Balance between closeness and exploration

‘Secure Base’ -> Safety is key to exploration

Secure base behaviour in Harlow’s Rhesus Monkey Experiment (start video at 5-minutes in)

Attachment

  • Universal characteristics:

    • Almost all infants become attached to a caregiver
  • Individual Differences:

    • Quality of care shapes infant’s predictions about caregiver, and shapes their attachment

How predictions shape attachment

  • All brains (even a baby’s brain) are constantly making predictions

  • Over time, infant is developing expectations about the parent’s behaviour

    • How quickly do they respond to the infant’s needs

    • How likely they are to ignore the infant

    • How likely they are to respond with anger

    • How likely the parent is to be unpredictable

  • According to Cognitive Developmental Psychologists, those expectations create an internal working model in the mind of the infant.

  • But this internal working model is not only applied to the infants’ expectations about that caregiver

  • Instead, infants generalize their expectation to form general expectations about how relationships work (“this is how I should act”, “this is how others will act”)

    • This generalizing is an example of Inductive reasoning:

      • using a specific observation to form a general conclusion

Mary Ainsworth’s Strange Situation Test

  • Goal: To measure the quality of attachment in infant-caregiver relationship.
  • Rationale: when an infant becomes distressed, their ‘attachment system’ is activated.

Ainsworth’s Strange Situation Test

The Strange Situation Test - Procedure

Hypotheses & Predictions - Secure Attachment

  • Ainsworth hypothesized that infants who are securely attached to their caregiver experience distress when they are separated from the caregiver, and will attempt to alleviate their distress by crying (i.e., communicating their needs to the caregiver).

  • 4 specific predicted behaviours signalling secure attachment in the Strange Situation procedure:

    1. They should seek to be near their caregiver whenever possible

    2. They should show distress when they are separated from the caregiver

    3. They should not be soothed by the stranger, when the caregiver is away

    4. They should be soothed when the parent returns

    5. They should orient their actions more toward the caregiver when they are present

Hypotheses & Predictions - Insecure attachment styles

  1. Insecure avoidant attachment

    1. Infant explores when they are with the mother
    2. Infant is not distressed when she leaves
    3. Infant avoids the mother when she returns
    4. Infant does not react differently when alone with the stranger
    5. The mother and the stranger are able to comfort the infant equally well

Hypotheses & Predictions - Insecure attachment styles

  1. Insecure resistant attachment

    1. Compared to other attachment types, these infants are the least likely to explore
    2. Infant is the most distressed when the mother leaves
    3. stays close to the mother when she returns (but infant may act angry)
    4. Infant avoids the stranger (may be fearful of the stranger)

Hypotheses & Predictions - Insecure attachment styles

  1. Disorganized attachment (rare)

    1. Incoherent or bizarre behaviour

    2. Typically associated with maltreatment of the infant, or may indicate presence of a developmental disorder

How parents’ behaviours create different styles of attachment

  • Consistently sensitive/responsive to infant’s needs = secure

  • Consistently insensitive/unresponsive to the infant’s needs = insecure avoidant

  • Inconsistently sensitive/responsive to the infant’s needs = insecure resistant

  • Unsafe (frightening or frightened) = insecure disorganized

Why attachment matters: Outcomes later in life

  1. Securely attached: higher self confidence, self esteem, social competence, better able to cope with challenges, greater sense of curiosity, better relationships with their peers and adults

  2. Insecure avoidant: lower on above dimensions, more likely to:

    1. prioritize independence and self-sufficiency instead of former close relationships

    2. have difficulty with intimacy and emotional expression

    3. have difficulties with commitment in intimate relationships

    4. experience toxic or abusive relationships

  3. Insecure resistant: lower on above dimensions, more likely to:

    1. develop dependency

    2. have difficulty trusting others

    3. be preoccupied with concerns of abandonment

    4. have a fear of intimacy

    5. be extremely sensitive to perceived rejection

    6. have difficulties resolving conflict

    7. have difficulties with self-esteem

    8. need assurance and validation from others

  4. Disorganized: more likely to dissociate, struggle with managing emotions, very disrupted by other people’s emotions.

But can anything be done to change our attachment?

  • Yes! (for better AND for worse)
  • Attachment is shaped by experience throughout our lifespan
  • If a securely attached infant experiences traumas/tragedy/disruptions during childhood or adolescence, they may develop insecure attachment in adulthood
  • If an insecurely attached infant becomes more exposed to warmth, responsiveness, reliability in others (significant other), their attachment can become more secure.

Is attachment only about child-caregiver relationship??

  • Attachment is equally important in romantic relationships in adulthood

  • Vulnerability is the heart of all intimate relationships

  • Vulnerability requires Trust

  • Trust requires Security

Summary

  1. Attachment is intertwined with distress

  2. Childhood attachment affects adult attachment

  3. Attachment styles vary

  4. Attachment can change throughout the lifespan

  5. Attachment is the key to intimacy

Next Lecture (Monday)

  • In the next lecture we will talk about the development of self control
  • and probably a lot of other interesting things (still deciding)
  • Also, I will be uploading a module for this week’s content to Nuku where we I will talk more about attachment styles and research into how stable they are and how much they can be changed! (I’ll put out an announcement)

Noho ora mai