# Load packages

# Core
library(tidyverse)
library(tidyquant)

Goal

Visualize and compare skewness of your portfolio and its assets.

Choose your stocks.

from 2012-12-31 to 2017-12-31

1 Import stock prices

symbols <- c("AMZN", "AAPL", "NFLX", "BA", "DELL")

prices <- tq_get(x    = symbols,
                 get  = "stock.prices",    
                 from = "2012-12-31",
                 to   = "2017-12-31")

2 Convert prices to returns

asset_returns_tbl <- prices %>%
    
    group_by(symbol) %>%
    
    tq_transmute(select     = adjusted, 
                 mutate_fun = periodReturn, 
                 period     = "monthly",
                 type       = "log") %>%
    
    slice(-1) %>%
    
    ungroup() %>%
    
    set_names(c("asset", "date", "returns"))

3 Assign a weight to each asset

# symbols
symbols <- asset_returns_tbl %>% distinct(asset) %>% pull()
symbols
## [1] "AAPL" "AMZN" "BA"   "DELL" "NFLX"
# weights
weights <- c(0.25, 0.25, 0.2, 0.2, 0.1)
weights
## [1] 0.25 0.25 0.20 0.20 0.10
w_tbl <- tibble(symbols, weights)
w_tbl
## # A tibble: 5 × 2
##   symbols weights
##   <chr>     <dbl>
## 1 AAPL       0.25
## 2 AMZN       0.25
## 3 BA         0.2 
## 4 DELL       0.2 
## 5 NFLX       0.1

4 Build a portfolio

# ?tq_portfolio

portfolio_returns_tbl <- asset_returns_tbl %>%
    
    tq_portfolio(assets_col = asset, 
                 returns_col = returns, 
                 weights = w_tbl, 
                 rebalance_on = "months", 
                 col_rename = "returns")

portfolio_returns_tbl
## # A tibble: 60 × 2
##    date       returns
##    <date>       <dbl>
##  1 2013-01-31  0.0292
##  2 2013-02-28  0.0147
##  3 2013-03-28  0.0255
##  4 2013-04-30  0.0137
##  5 2013-05-31  0.0419
##  6 2013-06-28 -0.0239
##  7 2013-07-31  0.0732
##  8 2013-08-30  0.0163
##  9 2013-09-30  0.0544
## 10 2013-10-31  0.0862
## # ℹ 50 more rows

5 Calculate Skewness

portfolio_returns_tbl %>%

    tq_performance(Ra = returns,
                   Rb = NULL,
                   performance_fun = table.Stats) %>%
    select(Skewness)
## # A tibble: 1 × 1
##   Skewness
##      <dbl>
## 1   -0.471

6 Plot

Expected Returns vs Risk

# Figure 5.2 Shaded histogram returns ----

portfolio_returns_tbl %>%

    # Create a new variable for shade
    mutate(returns_extreme_neg = if_else(returns < mean(returns) - 2*sd(returns),
                                   "yes",
                                   "no")) %>%

    # Plot
    ggplot(aes(returns, fill = returns_extreme_neg)) +
    geom_histogram(alpha = .7,
                   binwidth = .003) +

    scale_x_continuous(breaks = scales::pretty_breaks(n = 8)) +
    scale_fill_tq() +

    labs(x = "monthly returns")

# Figure 5.6 Asset and portfolio skewness comparison ----

asset_returns_skew_tbl <- asset_returns_tbl %>%

    # skewness for each asset
    group_by(asset) %>%
    summarise(skew = skewness(returns)) %>%
    ungroup() %>%

    # skewness of portfolio
    add_row(tibble(asset = "Portfolio",
                  skew = skewness(portfolio_returns_tbl$returns)))


asset_returns_skew_tbl %>%

    ggplot(aes(asset, skew, color = asset)) +
    geom_point() +

    # Add label for portfolio
    ggrepel::geom_text_repel(aes(label = asset),
                             data = asset_returns_skew_tbl %>%
                                 filter(asset == "Portfolio"),
                             size = 5,
                             show.legend = FALSE) +
    labs(y = "skewness")

Is any asset in your portfolio more likely to return extreme positive returns than your portfolio collectively? Discuss in terms of skewness. You may also refer to the distribution of returns you plotted in Code along 4. AMZN and BA are conisderly higher than the portfolio allowing me to interpert a higher positive return than the other stocks included in the graph.