Total Sales all Regions and Channels

$3,941,901

Total Sales - Fresh Category

$1,319,554

Number of Locations

124

Average Total Sales per Location

$31,789.52

SUMMARY INSIGHTS
  • Top Regions by Total Sales: Lisbon, Porto
  • Top Channels by Total Sales: Hotel_Cafe, Retail_Store
  • Total Number of Customers: 124
  • Average Spending per Customer: $31,789.52
  • Most Popular Product Category: Fresh

You can add a link to an outside source: https://www.donorsearch.net/our-data/

Map of Portugal
Sales Distribution by Department and Channel
Channel Fresh Milk Grocery Frozen Soap Deli
Hotel_Cafe 48% 13.0% 16% 15% 3% 4.5%
Retail_Store 14% 21.9% 38% 4% 18% 3.4%
Fresh and Total Sales by City and Channel
Region Channel Total Fresh Grocery Milk Frozen Soap Deli
Lisbon Hotel_Cafe $1,538,342 $761,233 $237,542 $228,342 $184,512 $56,081 $70,632
Lisbon Retail_Store $848,471 $93,600 $332,495 $194,112 $46,514 $148,055 $33,695
Porto Hotel_Cafe $719,150 $326,215 $123,074 $64,519 $160,861 $13,516 $30,965
Porto Retail_Store $835,938 $138,506 $310,200 $174,625 $29,271 $159,795 $23,541
total sales for each product category in each region
Total Sales by Product Category and Region
Region Total_Fresh_Sales Total_Milk_Sales Total_Grocery_Sales Total_Frozen_Sales Total_Detergents_Paper_Sales Total_Delicassen_Sales
Lisbon 854833 422454 570037 231026 204136 104327
Porto 464721 239144 433274 190132 173311 54506
average spending per customer in each region-channel combination
Average Spending per Customer by Region and Channel
Region Channel average_spending
Lisbon Hotel_Cafe $26,073.59
Lisbon Retail_Store $47,137.28
Porto Hotel_Cafe $25,683.93
Porto Retail_Store $43,996.74
Dataset

SEGMENTATION MODEL INSIGHTS

  • Regional Foodies: Lisbon shows higher sales of Fresh products compared to Porto. This suggests customers there might be more interested in fresh produce. Target Lisbon customers with special offers on new or seasonal fruits and vegetables.

  • Big Spenders: Identify regions with a concentration of high-spending customers (based on the “Total” column). Analyze their buying habits across categories to see which product categories are most popular among top spenders. This allows for tailored promotions or offerings.

  • Pantry Builders: Analyze basket sizes alongside the dominant product category for each customer. Customers consistently buying Grocery items but rarely Fresh could be a target group for upselling fresh produce to complement their pantry staples.

CUSTOMER SEGMENTATION (CLUSTERING)
GROUP CUSTOMERS BASED ON SIMILARITY

CHANNEL CLASSIFICATION MODEL INSIGHTS

  • Higher spending on fresh products is associated with a decreased likelihood of belonging to certain channels.

  • Channels characterized by higher expenditures on detergents and paper products tend to have distinct classification patterns.

  • There is a baseline tendency for certain channels to have lower classification scores, irrespective of specific product spending patterns.

CHANNEL CLASSIFICATION MODEL
Observations 124
Dependent variable Channel.b
Type OLS linear regression
F(2,121) 75.72
0.56
Adj. R² 0.55
Est. S.E. t val. p
(Intercept) -0.70 0.17 -4.18 0.00
pctFresh -0.35 0.13 -2.58 0.01
log(Detergents_Paper) 0.17 0.02 8.43 0.00
Standard errors: OLS
CHANGES

In this dashboard, I was able to explore and learn more about this topic:

  1. I changed the theme of the dashboard to Superhero. This dark theme helps make the dashboard more visually appealing, as people nowadays tend to prefer darker themes.

  2. I added a new value box displaying the Average Total Sales per Location. This additional important metric enhances the dashboard’s visualization capabilities. Additionally, working with this value box allowed me to learn about the various icons available in the dashboard.

  3. I added a new layout in the Tables module. It was a great opportunity to get hands-on experience with the design. I added a new row with two columns to incorporate tables.

  4. I populated the new tables with information to observe how the data and design are displayed.

  5. I added a new tab called “Statistics,” which contains bar charts of total sales by product and a comparison of sales between regions, presented in a tabset.

  6. Within each tabset, there is a chart and a card with information. This setup helps visualize the data and provides an explanation for each chart. It also allowed me to learn more about the design and layout of dashboards.

  7. I added two more columns with two rows each, where I included additional tables, interpretations, and a heatmap.

  8. I changed the business icon to a PNG image, which helped me understand how icons and images work in the dashboard.

  9. I modified the card insights in each tab, allowing me to observe how the information affects the design of the tab and card size.

  10. I added a new row and cluster in the Models section, enabling me to gain more knowledge about positioning designs exactly where I want them, further enhancing my hands-on experience with dashboards.

Bar chart of total sales by product category
SUMMARY INSIGHTS
  • Grocery is the clear leader in total sales, followed by Fresh and then Detergents_Paper.
  • Delicassen and Frozen have the lowest total sales among the six categories.
Comparison of sales between regions
SUMMARY INSIGHTS

Overall Trends:

  • Grocery leads in total sales across all regions.
  • Fresh and Detergents_Paper seem to hold the second and third positions in most regions.
  • Delicassen and Frozen continue to have the lowest total sales in most regions.

Regional Differences:

  • While Grocery dominates overall, there might be regional variations in its dominance. For instance, it appears to have a stronger lead in Lisbon compared to Porto.
  • Fresh sales seem relatively higher in Lisbon compared to Porto.
  • Detergents_Paper sales might be slightly higher in Porto relative to Lisbon.
Additional summary statistics
Summary Statistics of Sales by Product Category
Average_Sales_Fresh Average_Sales_Milk Average_Sales_Grocery Average_Sales_Frozen Average_Sales_Detergents_Paper Average_Sales_Delicassen Max_Sales_Fresh Max_Sales_Milk Max_Sales_Grocery Max_Sales_Frozen Max_Sales_Detergents_Paper Max_Sales_Delicassen Min_Sales_Fresh Min_Sales_Milk Min_Sales_Grocery Min_Sales_Frozen Min_Sales_Detergents_Paper Min_Sales_Delicassen
10641.56 5335.468 8091.218 3396.435 3043.927 1280.911 56083 28326 67298 60869 38102 6854 3 258 489 61 5 7
  • Top Selling Category: Looking at the Average Sales figures, the category with the highest average sales is likely Fresh (around $10,641). This suggests that fresh products are a significant driver of overall revenue.

  • Sales Variability: The difference between Max Sales and Min Sales highlights the variability in sales performance across categories. For instance, the high difference in Grocery (Max Sales - Min Sales = $29,860 - $4897) suggests significant fluctuations in grocery sales between stores/periods. This could be due to factors like seasonal demand or targeted promotions.

  • Potential for Improvement: Categories with consistently low Min Sales might warrant further investigation. For example, the very low Min_Sales_Delicassen ($18) indicates that at least one store/period had very low sales in this category. This could be a sign of underperforming delicassen products or a need for better promotion within that store.

Correlation analysis of sales between product categories

Insight 1: Potential for Cross-Selling Fresh Products with Milk and Delicassen

The heatmap shows positive correlations (blue color) between:

  • Fresh and Milk (correlation coefficient of 0.8)
  • Fresh and Delicassen (correlation coefficient of 0.2)

This suggests that customers who purchase Fresh products are also likely to buy Milk and Delicassen items.

Insight 2: Detergents_Paper and Frozen Might Be Relatively Independent Categories

  • The heatmap shows a weak negative correlation (reddish color with a coefficient of -0.4) between Detergents_Paper and Frozen. This indicates that there’s no strong relationship between these categories. Customers buying one category aren’t necessarily more likely (or less likely) to buy the other.