Using R, build a multiple regression model for data that interests you. Include in this model at least one quadratic term, one dichotomous term, and one dichotomous vs. quantitative interaction term. Interpret all coefficients. Conduct residual analysis. Was the linear model appropriate? Why or why not?
For this assignment, I will use the Human Freedom Index 2023, which presents the state of human freedom worldwide based on personal, civil, and economic freedom indicators.
data <- read_csv("https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Heleinef/Data-Science-Master_Heleine/main/Human%20Freedom%20Index_2023.csv")
## Rows: 495 Columns: 146
## ── Column specification ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
## Delimiter: ","
## chr (5): iso, countries, region, ef_government_tax_income_data, ef_governm...
## dbl (139): year, hf_score, hf_rank, hf_quartile, pf_rol_procedural, pf_rol_c...
## lgl (2): pf_identity_inheritance_widows, pf_identity_inheritance_daughters
##
## ℹ Use `spec()` to retrieve the full column specification for this data.
## ℹ Specify the column types or set `show_col_types = FALSE` to quiet this message.
hfi <- data
names(hfi)
## [1] "year"
## [2] "iso"
## [3] "countries"
## [4] "region"
## [5] "hf_score"
## [6] "hf_rank"
## [7] "hf_quartile"
## [8] "pf_rol_procedural"
## [9] "pf_rol_civil"
## [10] "pf_rol_criminal"
## [11] "pf_rol_vdem"
## [12] "pf_rol"
## [13] "pf_ss_homicide"
## [14] "pf_ss_homicide_data"
## [15] "pf_ss_disappearances_disap"
## [16] "pf_ss_disappearances_violent"
## [17] "pf_ss_disappearances_violent_data"
## [18] "pf_ss_disappearances_organized"
## [19] "pf_ss_disappearances_fatalities"
## [20] "pf_ss_disappearances_fatalities_data"
## [21] "pf_ss_disappearances_injuries"
## [22] "pf_ss_disappearances_injuries_data"
## [23] "pf_ss_disappearances_torture"
## [24] "pf_ss_killings"
## [25] "pf_ss_disappearances"
## [26] "pf_ss"
## [27] "pf_movement_vdem_foreign"
## [28] "pf_movement_vdem_men"
## [29] "pf_movement_vdem_women"
## [30] "pf_movement_vdem"
## [31] "pf_movement_cld"
## [32] "pf_movement"
## [33] "pf_religion_freedom_vdem"
## [34] "pf_religion_freedom_cld"
## [35] "pf_religion_freedom"
## [36] "pf_religion_suppression"
## [37] "pf_religion"
## [38] "pf_assembly_entry"
## [39] "pf_assembly_freedom_house"
## [40] "pf_assembly_freedom_bti"
## [41] "pf_assembly_freedom_cld"
## [42] "pf_assembly_freedom"
## [43] "pf_assembly_parties_barriers"
## [44] "pf_assembly_parties_bans"
## [45] "pf_assembly_parties_auton"
## [46] "pf_assembly_parties"
## [47] "pf_assembly_civil"
## [48] "pf_assembly"
## [49] "pf_expression_direct_killed"
## [50] "pf_expression_direct_killed_data"
## [51] "pf_expression_direct_jailed"
## [52] "pf_expression_direct_jailed_data"
## [53] "pf_expression_direct"
## [54] "pf_expression_vdem_cultural"
## [55] "pf_expression_vdem_harass"
## [56] "pf_expression_vdem_gov"
## [57] "pf_expression_vdem_internet"
## [58] "pf_expression_vdem_selfcens"
## [59] "pf_expression_vdem"
## [60] "pf_expression_house"
## [61] "pf_expression_bti"
## [62] "pf_expression_cld"
## [63] "pf_expression"
## [64] "pf_identity_same_m"
## [65] "pf_identity_same_f"
## [66] "pf_identity_same"
## [67] "pf_identity_divorce"
## [68] "pf_identity_inheritance_widows"
## [69] "pf_identity_inheritance_daughters"
## [70] "pf_identity_inheritance"
## [71] "pf_identity_fgm"
## [72] "pf_identity"
## [73] "pf_score"
## [74] "pf_rank"
## [75] "ef_government_consumption"
## [76] "ef_government_consumption_data"
## [77] "ef_government_transfers"
## [78] "ef_government_transfers_data"
## [79] "ef_government_investment"
## [80] "ef_government_investment_data"
## [81] "ef_government_tax_income"
## [82] "ef_government_tax_income_data"
## [83] "ef_government_tax_payroll"
## [84] "ef_government_tax_payroll_data"
## [85] "ef_government_tax"
## [86] "ef_government_soa"
## [87] "ef_government"
## [88] "ef_legal_judicial"
## [89] "ef_legal_courts"
## [90] "ef_legal_protection"
## [91] "ef_legal_military"
## [92] "ef_legal_integrity"
## [93] "ef_legal_enforcement"
## [94] "ef_legal_regulatory"
## [95] "ef_legal_police"
## [96] "ef_gender"
## [97] "ef_legal"
## [98] "ef_money_growth"
## [99] "ef_money_growth_data"
## [100] "ef_money_sd"
## [101] "ef_money_sd_data"
## [102] "ef_money_inflation"
## [103] "ef_money_inflation_data"
## [104] "ef_money_currency"
## [105] "ef_money"
## [106] "ef_trade_tariffs_revenue"
## [107] "ef_trade_tariffs_revenue_data"
## [108] "ef_trade_tariffs_mean"
## [109] "ef_trade_tariffs_mean_data"
## [110] "ef_trade_tariffs_sd"
## [111] "ef_trade_tariffs_sd_data"
## [112] "ef_trade_tariffs"
## [113] "ef_trade_regulatory_nontariff"
## [114] "ef_trade_regulatory_costs"
## [115] "ef_trade_regulatory"
## [116] "ef_trade_black"
## [117] "ef_trade_movement_open"
## [118] "ef_trade_movement_capital"
## [119] "ef_trade_movement_visit"
## [120] "ef_trade_movement_assets"
## [121] "ef_trade_movement"
## [122] "ef_trade"
## [123] "ef_regulation_credit_ownership"
## [124] "ef_regulation_credit_private"
## [125] "ef_regulation_credit_interest"
## [126] "ef_regulation_credit"
## [127] "ef_regulation_labor_minwage"
## [128] "ef_regulation_labor_firing"
## [129] "ef_regulation_labor_bargain"
## [130] "ef_regulation_labor_hours"
## [131] "ef_regulation_labor_dismissal"
## [132] "ef_regulation_labor_conscription"
## [133] "ef_regulation_labor_foreign"
## [134] "ef_regulation_labor"
## [135] "ef_regulation_business_burden"
## [136] "ef_regulation_business_costs"
## [137] "ef_regulation_business_impartial"
## [138] "ef_regulation_business_compliance"
## [139] "ef_regulation_business"
## [140] "ef_regulation_enter_openness"
## [141] "ef_regulation_enter_permits"
## [142] "ef_regulation_enter_distortion"
## [143] "ef_regulation_enter"
## [144] "ef_regulation"
## [145] "ef_score"
## [146] "ef_rank"
# Subset the dataset with the variables of interest
hfi_subset <- hfi[, c("ef_score", "hf_score", "pf_score", "ef_money", "ef_trade")]
# Fit multiple regression model
model <- lm(hf_score ~ ef_score + pf_score + ef_money + ef_trade, data = hfi_subset)
# Print the summary of the model
summary(model)
##
## Call:
## lm(formula = hf_score ~ ef_score + pf_score + ef_money + ef_trade,
## data = hfi_subset)
##
## Residuals:
## Min 1Q Median 3Q Max
## -0.0091435 -0.0025929 -0.0000205 0.0026162 0.0087637
##
## Coefficients:
## Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|)
## (Intercept) 1.449e-03 1.044e-03 1.387 0.166
## ef_score 4.162e-01 4.853e-04 857.658 <2e-16 ***
## pf_score 5.835e-01 1.347e-04 4331.914 <2e-16 ***
## ef_money 9.187e-05 1.982e-04 0.464 0.643
## ef_trade -2.385e-05 2.375e-04 -0.100 0.920
## ---
## Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
##
## Residual standard error: 0.003429 on 490 degrees of freedom
## Multiple R-squared: 1, Adjusted R-squared: 1
## F-statistic: 1.751e+07 on 4 and 490 DF, p-value: < 2.2e-16
# Sub-setting the dataset with my variables of interest
hfi_subset <- hfi[, c("hf_score", "ef_score", "pf_score", "ef_money", "ef_trade", "region")]
# Creating quadratic term for ef_score
hfi_subset$ef_score_squared <- hfi_subset$ef_score^2
# Creating dichotomous term for region (e.g., if region is "Europe", then 1, else 0)
hfi_subset$is_europe <- ifelse(hfi_subset$region == "Europe", 1, 0)
# Creating interaction term between ef_score and ef_money
hfi_subset$interaction_ef_money_ef_score <- hfi_subset$ef_money * hfi_subset$ef_score
# Fitting multiple regression model with quadratic, dichotomous, and interaction terms
model <- lm(hf_score ~ ef_score + ef_score_squared + pf_score + ef_money + ef_trade + is_europe + interaction_ef_money_ef_score, data = hfi_subset)
# Print the summary of the model
summary(model)
##
## Call:
## lm(formula = hf_score ~ ef_score + ef_score_squared + pf_score +
## ef_money + ef_trade + is_europe + interaction_ef_money_ef_score,
## data = hfi_subset)
##
## Residuals:
## Min 1Q Median 3Q Max
## -0.0090682 -0.0026219 -0.0001298 0.0025724 0.0089482
##
## Coefficients: (1 not defined because of singularities)
## Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|)
## (Intercept) -5.300e-03 4.505e-03 -1.177 0.240
## ef_score 4.177e-01 2.090e-03 199.858 <2e-16 ***
## ef_score_squared -2.347e-05 2.280e-04 -0.103 0.918
## pf_score 5.835e-01 1.346e-04 4335.157 <2e-16 ***
## ef_money 7.026e-04 8.921e-04 0.788 0.431
## ef_trade 4.769e-05 2.467e-04 0.193 0.847
## is_europe NA NA NA NA
## interaction_ef_money_ef_score -1.306e-04 1.501e-04 -0.870 0.385
## ---
## Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
##
## Residual standard error: 0.003422 on 488 degrees of freedom
## Multiple R-squared: 1, Adjusted R-squared: 1
## F-statistic: 1.173e+07 on 6 and 488 DF, p-value: < 2.2e-16
# Residual analysis
par(mfrow=c(1,1))
plot(model)
Based on the summary output and the residual analysis, one can conclude that the model is appropriate. The residual plots analysis indicates that none of the assumptions of the linear model(homoscedasticity, linearity, and normality of residuals) have been violated. Therefore,the linear model is appropriate for the data.