Cardiac T1 and T2 Mapping at 1.5T: Nomograms and Evaluation of Deep Learning Reconstruction

Author

Lu Mao

Statistical analysis

Age- and gender-specific upper and lower ranges within each slice were calculated as the mean plus and minus 2 standard deviations of the normal data, respectively. Differences by age, gender, and slice were assessed by three-way repeated measures ANOVA. Repeatability and reproducibility were assessed by the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) (Fleiss 1971), repeatability/reproducibiliy coefficient, and Bland-Altman analysis. P-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. All analyses were performed in R version 4.3.2 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).

Subject characteristics

Table 1: Patient age distribution by gender.
Female (N=28) Male (N=22)
Age (years) median (IQR) 44.5 (31, 62.25) 41 (32.5, 53)
20-29 5 (17.9%) 5 (22.7%)
30-39 5 (17.9%) 5 (22.7%)
40-49 5 (17.9%) 6 (27.3%)
50-59 5 (17.9%) 2 (9.1%)
60-69 8 (28.6%) 4 (18.2%)

Age- and gender-specific reference ranges

  • Slice 1: AHA1 – AHA6, Sept1
  • Slice 2: AHA7 – AHA12, Sept2
  • Slice 3: AHA13 – AHA16, Sept3

T1 measurements

The age- and gender-specific mean values and 95% ranges are summarized within each slice for MOLLI and SMART in Table 2 and Table 3, and plotted in Figure 1 and Figure 2, respectively. Males tend to have smaller values than females. For MOLLI, slice 3 > slices 1 or 2 in general. Age differences are less clear.

Table 2: Age- and gender-specific mean (95% range) for T1-MOLLI.
Age Gender Slice 1 Slice 2 Slice 3
20-29 Female 1029 (935, 1123) 1042 (988, 1096) 1082 (990, 1173)
20-29 Male 954 (902, 1007) 968 (920, 1015) 996 (926, 1066)
30-39 Female 1007 (908, 1106) 1015 (908, 1122) 1050 (926, 1173)
30-39 Male 983 (916, 1051) 978 (895, 1061) 1005 (917, 1093)
40-49 Female 1069 (998, 1140) 1053 (963, 1142) 1106 (1029, 1183)
40-49 Male 968 (875, 1062) 975 (910, 1040) 1001 (920, 1082)
50-59 Female 1011 (905, 1117) 1028 (939, 1116) 1063 (951, 1175)
50-59 Male 994 (919, 1070) 992 (906, 1078) 1024 (881, 1167)
60-69 Female 1031 (903, 1160) 1023 (937, 1108) 1075 (900, 1251)
60-69 Male 974 (906, 1042) 963 (844, 1083) 1013 (855, 1171)

Figure 1: Bar chart for age- and gender-specific mean (95% range) for T1-MOLLI.
Table 3: Age- and gender-specific mean (95% range) for T1-SMART.
Age Gender Slice 1 Slice 2 Slice 3
20-29 Female 1260 (1132, 1389) 1263 (1174, 1352) 1328 (1132, 1524)
20-29 Male 1204 (1133, 1276) 1213 (1126, 1301) 1243 (1109, 1376)
30-39 Female 1233 (1139, 1327) 1229 (1111, 1346) 1249 (1105, 1392)
30-39 Male 1211 (1149, 1274) 1215 (1138, 1292) 1218 (1083, 1354)
40-49 Female 1280 (1182, 1379) 1275 (1149, 1401) 1261 (1139, 1384)
40-49 Male 1209 (1113, 1304) 1207 (1124, 1290) 1215 (1067, 1363)
50-59 Female 1255 (1119, 1392) 1253 (1147, 1358) 1254 (1060, 1447)
50-59 Male 1239 (1146, 1332) 1241 (1131, 1350) 1231 (1051, 1410)
60-69 Female 1253 (1129, 1376) 1266 (1174, 1358) 1271 (1070, 1471)
60-69 Male 1228 (1118, 1339) 1221 (1085, 1358) 1228 (1101, 1356)

Figure 2: Bar chart for age- and gender-specific mean (95% range) for T1-SMART.

Three-way ANOVA test (Table 4) confirms that gender and slice differences are significant, and that age difference is not.

Table 4: P-values from three-way ANOVA test on age, gender, and slice differences.
Age Gender Slice
MOLLI 0.864 <0.001 <0.001
SMART 0.407 <0.001 <0.001

T2 measurements

The age- and gender-specific mean values and 95% ranges are summarized within each slice for T2 and T2-fast in Table 5 and Table 6, and plotted in Figure 3 and Figure 4, respectively.

Table 5: Age- and gender-specific mean (95% range) for T2.
Age Gender Slice 1 Slice 2 Slice 3
20-29 Female 50.9 (38.8, 63) 52.7 (46.4, 59.1) 55.9 (47.1, 64.6)
20-29 Male 48.6 (42.1, 55.2) 49.6 (43.8, 55.5) 51.8 (41.5, 62.2)
30-39 Female 50.6 (44.1, 57.1) 50.5 (43.6, 57.4) 53.6 (44, 63.1)
30-39 Male 49.8 (44.2, 55.4) 51 (47.2, 54.8) 52.3 (46.2, 58.4)
40-49 Female 50.2 (44, 56.5) 51.3 (44.7, 57.8) 52.6 (46.5, 58.8)
40-49 Male 49.9 (44.6, 55.3) 51.3 (46.1, 56.5) 53.2 (45, 61.4)
50-59 Female 48.9 (40.8, 57) 49.8 (43.6, 56) 51.6 (42.3, 60.8)
50-59 Male 50.3 (44.1, 56.4) 50.1 (47.8, 52.4) 49 (45.2, 52.9)
60-69 Female 53.6 (46.1, 61.1) 54 (46.9, 61.1) 59.8 (44.8, 74.8)
60-69 Male 50.2 (42.6, 57.7) 52.3 (43.9, 60.7) 56.4 (44.7, 68.1)

Figure 3: Bar chart for age- and gender-specific mean (95% range) for T2.
Table 6: Age- and gender-specific mean (95% range) for T2-fast.
Age Gender Slice 1 Slice 2 Slice 3
20-29 Female 52.7 (41.2, 64.1) 54.2 (46.8, 61.5) 57.6 (50.2, 65.1)
20-29 Male 48.9 (37.7, 60.1) 50.8 (42.9, 58.7) 51.4 (41.5, 61.3)
30-39 Female 51.9 (44.5, 59.3) 51.5 (40.9, 62) 55 (44.6, 65.4)
30-39 Male 52.1 (44.3, 59.9) 52.7 (46.9, 58.4) 53.2 (46.2, 60.3)
40-49 Female 55.6 (47.1, 64.1) 53.6 (43.7, 63.5) 57 (41.9, 72.2)
40-49 Male 52.3 (45.3, 59.2) 52.7 (46.4, 58.9) 53.9 (45.6, 62.2)
50-59 Female 51.3 (38.7, 63.8) 51.1 (41.5, 60.7) 54.2 (40.5, 67.9)
50-59 Male 52.1 (45.7, 58.5) 52.3 (46.6, 58) 52.3 (44.7, 59.9)
60-69 Female 54.5 (46.2, 62.8) 56.3 (47, 65.7) 62.4 (46.3, 78.5)
60-69 Male 50.9 (43, 58.8) 53.7 (43.2, 64.2) 57 (42.5, 71.5)

Figure 4: Bar chart for age- and gender-specific mean (95% range) for T2-fast.

Three-way ANOVA test (Table 4) shows that age, gender and slice all have significant effects.

Table 7: P-values from three-way ANOVA test on age, gender, and slice differences.
Age Gender Slice
T2 <0.001 0.019 <0.001
T2-fast 0.016 0.007 <0.001

Area of septal contours

The mean and standard deviation (SD) of septal contour area by age and gender for T1 and T2 are summarized in Table 8 and Table 9, respectively. In general, sept1 > sept2 > sept3.

Table 8: Mean (SD) of septal contour area for T1.
Age Map Sept Female Male
20-29 MOLLI sept_1_area 244.1 (97.2) 384.4 (96.7)
20-29 MOLLI sept_2_area 225.1 (66.4) 244.6 (45)
20-29 MOLLI sept_3_area 103.3 (44.1) 145.4 (45.4)
20-29 SMART sept_1_area 226.2 (67.3) 357 (100)
20-29 SMART sept_2_area 221.6 (66.8) 242.1 (82)
20-29 SMART sept_3_area 81.4 (40.6) 133.8 (52.9)
30-39 MOLLI sept_1_area 229.1 (44.3) 296.3 (73.2)
30-39 MOLLI sept_2_area 181.7 (44.1) 217.8 (70.7)
30-39 MOLLI sept_3_area 85.1 (37.6) 110.3 (38.3)
30-39 SMART sept_1_area 205.7 (50.9) 308.8 (58.2)
30-39 SMART sept_2_area 172.5 (48.6) 237.6 (60.8)
30-39 SMART sept_3_area 87.6 (34.2) 112.6 (39.9)
40-49 MOLLI sept_1_area 276.3 (113) 330.5 (92.1)
40-49 MOLLI sept_2_area 259.7 (71.1) 250.3 (77.1)
40-49 MOLLI sept_3_area 120.2 (38.3) 134.3 (49.6)
40-49 SMART sept_1_area 316.7 (121.4) 307.8 (123.7)
40-49 SMART sept_2_area 289.6 (88) 256.3 (92.3)
40-49 SMART sept_3_area 124.8 (51.5) 117.7 (50.1)
50-59 MOLLI sept_1_area 225.7 (67) 447.9 (145.7)
50-59 MOLLI sept_2_area 167.1 (27.5) 307.7 (153.5)
50-59 MOLLI sept_3_area 92.6 (27.3) 144.5 (20.6)
50-59 SMART sept_1_area 223.1 (66.6) 429.9 (171.1)
50-59 SMART sept_2_area 166.4 (24.3) 323.4 (115.6)
50-59 SMART sept_3_area 90.5 (22.9) 120.4 (27.4)
60-69 MOLLI sept_1_area 212.9 (71) 288.4 (69.7)
60-69 MOLLI sept_2_area 179.5 (61.3) 195.1 (29.2)
60-69 MOLLI sept_3_area 76.6 (16.2) 87.5 (38.4)
60-69 SMART sept_1_area 210.1 (57.4) 225.7 (144.6)
60-69 SMART sept_2_area 160.8 (57.1) 216.3 (42.2)
60-69 SMART sept_3_area 65.1 (22.9) 96.7 (33.9)
Table 9: Mean (SD) of septal contour area for T2.
Age Map Sept Female Male
20-29 T2 sept_1_area 256.3 (117.2) 340.4 (116)
20-29 T2 sept_2_area 239 (45.9) 256.9 (77.4)
20-29 T2 sept_3_area 113.1 (29.1) 141.1 (40.7)
20-29 T2fast sept_1_area 266.1 (121.1) 449.6 (44.4)
20-29 T2fast sept_2_area 256.2 (49.3) 265.9 (78.1)
20-29 T2fast sept_3_area 134.5 (31.2) 153.4 (44.3)
30-39 T2 sept_1_area 284.1 (69.2) 384.6 (135)
30-39 T2 sept_2_area 241.7 (119.4) 258.7 (30.7)
30-39 T2 sept_3_area 123.5 (58.3) 143.6 (36.5)
30-39 T2fast sept_1_area 185.4 (27.7) 343.1 (129.8)
30-39 T2fast sept_2_area 235 (104.1) 283.4 (84.7)
30-39 T2fast sept_3_area 134.6 (65.2) 120.3 (38.2)
40-49 T2 sept_1_area 408.8 (143.5) 411.4 (120.6)
40-49 T2 sept_2_area 312.5 (83.7) 285.1 (61.1)
40-49 T2 sept_3_area 159.6 (58.7) 125.2 (46.4)
40-49 T2fast sept_1_area 382.9 (168.9) 386.1 (116.7)
40-49 T2fast sept_2_area 305.3 (80.9) 289.5 (69.7)
40-49 T2fast sept_3_area 136.7 (39.8) 124.7 (41.1)
50-59 T2 sept_1_area 307.6 (172.2) 378.1 (0.1)
50-59 T2 sept_2_area 208 (50.1) 285.6 (64.7)
50-59 T2 sept_3_area 117 (39.2) 189.2 (69.4)
50-59 T2fast sept_1_area 314.7 (157.1) 380.7 (171.4)
50-59 T2fast sept_2_area 191.8 (58.3) 219.3 (65.1)
50-59 T2fast sept_3_area 112.2 (28.3) 176.4 (78.4)
60-69 T2 sept_1_area 246.4 (94.6) 399.2 (136.7)
60-69 T2 sept_2_area 173.9 (41.7) 212.2 (86.9)
60-69 T2 sept_3_area 86.8 (35.2) 96.2 (37.4)
60-69 T2fast sept_1_area 214.7 (92.4) 364.5 (159.4)
60-69 T2fast sept_2_area 175 (76) 219.4 (105)
60-69 T2fast sept_3_area 84.9 (31.6) 93 (15.8)

Repeatability and Reproducibility

Repeatability for DL reconstructions

The bias, repeatability coefficient (RC), intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and 95% confidence interval comparing scan A vs B are tabulated in Table 10. Bland-Altman plots are shown in Figure 5.

Table 10: Repeatability analysis of T1 and T2.
map Bias RC ICC (95% CI) P-value
MOLLI 19.8 78.3 0.616 (0.527, 0.692) p<0.001
SMART 7.5 114.7 0.516 (0.405, 0.612) p<0.001
T2 0.9 6.5 0.59 (0.494, 0.672) p<0.001
T2fast 0.3 10.7 0.304 (0.175, 0.423) p<0.001

Figure 5: Bland-Altman analysis of repeatability for T1 and T2

Between-system reproducibility

The bias, reproducibility coefficient (RC), intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and 95% confidence interval comparing scan A vs B are tabulated in Table 11. Bland-Altman plots are shown in Figure 6.

Table 11: Between-system reproducibility analysis of T1 and T2.
map Bias RC ICC (95% CI) P-value
MOLLI 4.4 113.3 0.601 (0.515, 0.675) p<0.001
SMART -4.3 148.7 0.45 (0.344, 0.545) p<0.001
T2 -0.4 10.4 0.41 (0.307, 0.503) p<0.001
T2fast -0.5 12.4 0.395 (0.285, 0.495) p<0.001

Figure 6: Bland-Altman analysis of between-system reproducibility for T1 and T2

Between-sequence reproducibility

The bias, reproducibility coefficient (RC), intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and 95% confidence interval comparing MOLLI vs SMART and T2 vs T2fast are tabulated in Table 12. Bland-Altman plots are shown in Figure 7. (Non-inter-system: priority scan A \(\to\) B; inter-system: priority scan B \(\to\) A.) Bias for MOLLI vs SMART is substantial: SMART values are bigger, causing lack of agreement.

Table 12: Between-sequence reproducibility analysis of T1 and T2.
Bias RC ICC (95% CI) P-value
MOLLI vs SMART -228.6 142.9 -0.641 (-0.679, -0.601) p=1
T2 vs T2-fast -1.5 9.5 0.598 (0.554, 0.64) p<0.001

Figure 7: Bland-Altman analysis of between-sequence reproducibility for T1 and T2

Between-recon reproducibility

The bias, reproducibility coefficient (RC), intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and 95% confidence interval comparing MOLLI: Std vs DL, T2: Std vs DL, and T2: DL vs GE are tabulated in Table 13. Bland-Altman plots are shown in Figure 8. (Non-inter-system: priority scan A \(\to\) B; inter-system: priority scan B \(\to\) A.) There is strong agreement within the three pairs of comparisons.

Table 13: Between-recon reproducibility analysis of T1 and T2.
Bias RC ICC (95% CI) P-value
MOLLI: Std vs DL -0.7 41.5 0.944 (0.936, 0.95) p<0.001
T2: Std vs DL 0.1 3.1 0.951 (0.944, 0.956) p<0.001
T2: DL vs GE -0.6 3.8 0.906 (0.893, 0.918) p<0.001

Figure 8: Bland-Altman analysis of between-recon reproducibility for T1 and T2

Between-reader reproducibility

The bias, reproducibility coefficient (RC), intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and 95% confidence interval comparing RVS vs AF for MOLLI and T2 are tabulated in Table 14. Bland-Altman plots are shown in Figure 9. (Non-inter-system: priority scan A \(\to\) B; inter-system: priority scan B \(\to\) A.) The inter-reader agreement is strong.

Table 14: Between-reader (RVS vs AF) reproducibility analysis of MOLLI and T2.
Bias RC ICC (95% CI) P-value
MOLLI 1.6 70.2 0.807 (0.765, 0.842) p<0.001
T2 0.8 6.4 0.711 (0.654, 0.76) p<0.001

Figure 9: Bland-Altman analysis of between-reader (RVS vs AF) reproducibility for MOLLI and T2

References

Fleiss, Joseph L. 1971. “Measuring Nominal Scale Agreement Among Many Raters.” Psychological Bulletin 76 (5): 378–82. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0031619.