Statistical analysis
Age- and gender-specific upper and lower ranges within each slice were calculated as the mean plus and minus 2 standard deviations of the normal data, respectively. Differences by age, gender, and slice were assessed by three-way repeated measures ANOVA. Repeatability and reproducibility were assessed by the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) (Fleiss 1971), repeatability/reproducibiliy coefficient, and Bland-Altman analysis. P-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. All analyses were performed in R version 4.3.2 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).
Subject characteristics
Table 1: Patient age distribution by gender.
Age (years) |
median (IQR) |
44.5 (31, 62.25) |
41 (32.5, 53) |
|
20-29 |
5 (17.9%) |
5 (22.7%) |
|
30-39 |
5 (17.9%) |
5 (22.7%) |
|
40-49 |
5 (17.9%) |
6 (27.3%) |
|
50-59 |
5 (17.9%) |
2 (9.1%) |
|
60-69 |
8 (28.6%) |
4 (18.2%) |
Age- and gender-specific reference ranges
- Slice 1: AHA1 – AHA6, Sept1
- Slice 2: AHA7 – AHA12, Sept2
- Slice 3: AHA13 – AHA16, Sept3
T1 measurements
The age- and gender-specific mean values and 95% ranges are summarized within each slice for MOLLI and SMART in Table 2 and Table 3, and plotted in Figure 1 and Figure 2, respectively. Males tend to have smaller values than females. For MOLLI, slice 3 > slices 1 or 2 in general. Age differences are less clear.
Table 2: Age- and gender-specific mean (95% range) for T1-MOLLI.
20-29 |
Female |
1029 (935, 1123) |
1042 (988, 1096) |
1082 (990, 1173) |
20-29 |
Male |
954 (902, 1007) |
968 (920, 1015) |
996 (926, 1066) |
30-39 |
Female |
1007 (908, 1106) |
1015 (908, 1122) |
1050 (926, 1173) |
30-39 |
Male |
983 (916, 1051) |
978 (895, 1061) |
1005 (917, 1093) |
40-49 |
Female |
1069 (998, 1140) |
1053 (963, 1142) |
1106 (1029, 1183) |
40-49 |
Male |
968 (875, 1062) |
975 (910, 1040) |
1001 (920, 1082) |
50-59 |
Female |
1011 (905, 1117) |
1028 (939, 1116) |
1063 (951, 1175) |
50-59 |
Male |
994 (919, 1070) |
992 (906, 1078) |
1024 (881, 1167) |
60-69 |
Female |
1031 (903, 1160) |
1023 (937, 1108) |
1075 (900, 1251) |
60-69 |
Male |
974 (906, 1042) |
963 (844, 1083) |
1013 (855, 1171) |
Table 3: Age- and gender-specific mean (95% range) for T1-SMART.
20-29 |
Female |
1260 (1132, 1389) |
1263 (1174, 1352) |
1328 (1132, 1524) |
20-29 |
Male |
1204 (1133, 1276) |
1213 (1126, 1301) |
1243 (1109, 1376) |
30-39 |
Female |
1233 (1139, 1327) |
1229 (1111, 1346) |
1249 (1105, 1392) |
30-39 |
Male |
1211 (1149, 1274) |
1215 (1138, 1292) |
1218 (1083, 1354) |
40-49 |
Female |
1280 (1182, 1379) |
1275 (1149, 1401) |
1261 (1139, 1384) |
40-49 |
Male |
1209 (1113, 1304) |
1207 (1124, 1290) |
1215 (1067, 1363) |
50-59 |
Female |
1255 (1119, 1392) |
1253 (1147, 1358) |
1254 (1060, 1447) |
50-59 |
Male |
1239 (1146, 1332) |
1241 (1131, 1350) |
1231 (1051, 1410) |
60-69 |
Female |
1253 (1129, 1376) |
1266 (1174, 1358) |
1271 (1070, 1471) |
60-69 |
Male |
1228 (1118, 1339) |
1221 (1085, 1358) |
1228 (1101, 1356) |
Three-way ANOVA test (Table 4) confirms that gender and slice differences are significant, and that age difference is not.
Table 4: P-values from three-way ANOVA test on age, gender, and slice differences.
MOLLI |
0.864 |
<0.001 |
<0.001 |
SMART |
0.407 |
<0.001 |
<0.001 |
T2 measurements
The age- and gender-specific mean values and 95% ranges are summarized within each slice for T2 and T2-fast in Table 5 and Table 6, and plotted in Figure 3 and Figure 4, respectively.
Table 5: Age- and gender-specific mean (95% range) for T2.
20-29 |
Female |
50.9 (38.8, 63) |
52.7 (46.4, 59.1) |
55.9 (47.1, 64.6) |
20-29 |
Male |
48.6 (42.1, 55.2) |
49.6 (43.8, 55.5) |
51.8 (41.5, 62.2) |
30-39 |
Female |
50.6 (44.1, 57.1) |
50.5 (43.6, 57.4) |
53.6 (44, 63.1) |
30-39 |
Male |
49.8 (44.2, 55.4) |
51 (47.2, 54.8) |
52.3 (46.2, 58.4) |
40-49 |
Female |
50.2 (44, 56.5) |
51.3 (44.7, 57.8) |
52.6 (46.5, 58.8) |
40-49 |
Male |
49.9 (44.6, 55.3) |
51.3 (46.1, 56.5) |
53.2 (45, 61.4) |
50-59 |
Female |
48.9 (40.8, 57) |
49.8 (43.6, 56) |
51.6 (42.3, 60.8) |
50-59 |
Male |
50.3 (44.1, 56.4) |
50.1 (47.8, 52.4) |
49 (45.2, 52.9) |
60-69 |
Female |
53.6 (46.1, 61.1) |
54 (46.9, 61.1) |
59.8 (44.8, 74.8) |
60-69 |
Male |
50.2 (42.6, 57.7) |
52.3 (43.9, 60.7) |
56.4 (44.7, 68.1) |
Table 6: Age- and gender-specific mean (95% range) for T2-fast.
20-29 |
Female |
52.7 (41.2, 64.1) |
54.2 (46.8, 61.5) |
57.6 (50.2, 65.1) |
20-29 |
Male |
48.9 (37.7, 60.1) |
50.8 (42.9, 58.7) |
51.4 (41.5, 61.3) |
30-39 |
Female |
51.9 (44.5, 59.3) |
51.5 (40.9, 62) |
55 (44.6, 65.4) |
30-39 |
Male |
52.1 (44.3, 59.9) |
52.7 (46.9, 58.4) |
53.2 (46.2, 60.3) |
40-49 |
Female |
55.6 (47.1, 64.1) |
53.6 (43.7, 63.5) |
57 (41.9, 72.2) |
40-49 |
Male |
52.3 (45.3, 59.2) |
52.7 (46.4, 58.9) |
53.9 (45.6, 62.2) |
50-59 |
Female |
51.3 (38.7, 63.8) |
51.1 (41.5, 60.7) |
54.2 (40.5, 67.9) |
50-59 |
Male |
52.1 (45.7, 58.5) |
52.3 (46.6, 58) |
52.3 (44.7, 59.9) |
60-69 |
Female |
54.5 (46.2, 62.8) |
56.3 (47, 65.7) |
62.4 (46.3, 78.5) |
60-69 |
Male |
50.9 (43, 58.8) |
53.7 (43.2, 64.2) |
57 (42.5, 71.5) |
Three-way ANOVA test (Table 4) shows that age, gender and slice all have significant effects.
Table 7: P-values from three-way ANOVA test on age, gender, and slice differences.
T2 |
<0.001 |
0.019 |
<0.001 |
T2-fast |
0.016 |
0.007 |
<0.001 |
Area of septal contours
The mean and standard deviation (SD) of septal contour area by age and gender for T1 and T2 are summarized in Table 8 and Table 9, respectively. In general, sept1 > sept2 > sept3.
Table 8: Mean (SD) of septal contour area for T1.
20-29 |
MOLLI |
sept_1_area |
244.1 (97.2) |
384.4 (96.7) |
20-29 |
MOLLI |
sept_2_area |
225.1 (66.4) |
244.6 (45) |
20-29 |
MOLLI |
sept_3_area |
103.3 (44.1) |
145.4 (45.4) |
20-29 |
SMART |
sept_1_area |
226.2 (67.3) |
357 (100) |
20-29 |
SMART |
sept_2_area |
221.6 (66.8) |
242.1 (82) |
20-29 |
SMART |
sept_3_area |
81.4 (40.6) |
133.8 (52.9) |
30-39 |
MOLLI |
sept_1_area |
229.1 (44.3) |
296.3 (73.2) |
30-39 |
MOLLI |
sept_2_area |
181.7 (44.1) |
217.8 (70.7) |
30-39 |
MOLLI |
sept_3_area |
85.1 (37.6) |
110.3 (38.3) |
30-39 |
SMART |
sept_1_area |
205.7 (50.9) |
308.8 (58.2) |
30-39 |
SMART |
sept_2_area |
172.5 (48.6) |
237.6 (60.8) |
30-39 |
SMART |
sept_3_area |
87.6 (34.2) |
112.6 (39.9) |
40-49 |
MOLLI |
sept_1_area |
276.3 (113) |
330.5 (92.1) |
40-49 |
MOLLI |
sept_2_area |
259.7 (71.1) |
250.3 (77.1) |
40-49 |
MOLLI |
sept_3_area |
120.2 (38.3) |
134.3 (49.6) |
40-49 |
SMART |
sept_1_area |
316.7 (121.4) |
307.8 (123.7) |
40-49 |
SMART |
sept_2_area |
289.6 (88) |
256.3 (92.3) |
40-49 |
SMART |
sept_3_area |
124.8 (51.5) |
117.7 (50.1) |
50-59 |
MOLLI |
sept_1_area |
225.7 (67) |
447.9 (145.7) |
50-59 |
MOLLI |
sept_2_area |
167.1 (27.5) |
307.7 (153.5) |
50-59 |
MOLLI |
sept_3_area |
92.6 (27.3) |
144.5 (20.6) |
50-59 |
SMART |
sept_1_area |
223.1 (66.6) |
429.9 (171.1) |
50-59 |
SMART |
sept_2_area |
166.4 (24.3) |
323.4 (115.6) |
50-59 |
SMART |
sept_3_area |
90.5 (22.9) |
120.4 (27.4) |
60-69 |
MOLLI |
sept_1_area |
212.9 (71) |
288.4 (69.7) |
60-69 |
MOLLI |
sept_2_area |
179.5 (61.3) |
195.1 (29.2) |
60-69 |
MOLLI |
sept_3_area |
76.6 (16.2) |
87.5 (38.4) |
60-69 |
SMART |
sept_1_area |
210.1 (57.4) |
225.7 (144.6) |
60-69 |
SMART |
sept_2_area |
160.8 (57.1) |
216.3 (42.2) |
60-69 |
SMART |
sept_3_area |
65.1 (22.9) |
96.7 (33.9) |
Table 9: Mean (SD) of septal contour area for T2.
20-29 |
T2 |
sept_1_area |
256.3 (117.2) |
340.4 (116) |
20-29 |
T2 |
sept_2_area |
239 (45.9) |
256.9 (77.4) |
20-29 |
T2 |
sept_3_area |
113.1 (29.1) |
141.1 (40.7) |
20-29 |
T2fast |
sept_1_area |
266.1 (121.1) |
449.6 (44.4) |
20-29 |
T2fast |
sept_2_area |
256.2 (49.3) |
265.9 (78.1) |
20-29 |
T2fast |
sept_3_area |
134.5 (31.2) |
153.4 (44.3) |
30-39 |
T2 |
sept_1_area |
284.1 (69.2) |
384.6 (135) |
30-39 |
T2 |
sept_2_area |
241.7 (119.4) |
258.7 (30.7) |
30-39 |
T2 |
sept_3_area |
123.5 (58.3) |
143.6 (36.5) |
30-39 |
T2fast |
sept_1_area |
185.4 (27.7) |
343.1 (129.8) |
30-39 |
T2fast |
sept_2_area |
235 (104.1) |
283.4 (84.7) |
30-39 |
T2fast |
sept_3_area |
134.6 (65.2) |
120.3 (38.2) |
40-49 |
T2 |
sept_1_area |
408.8 (143.5) |
411.4 (120.6) |
40-49 |
T2 |
sept_2_area |
312.5 (83.7) |
285.1 (61.1) |
40-49 |
T2 |
sept_3_area |
159.6 (58.7) |
125.2 (46.4) |
40-49 |
T2fast |
sept_1_area |
382.9 (168.9) |
386.1 (116.7) |
40-49 |
T2fast |
sept_2_area |
305.3 (80.9) |
289.5 (69.7) |
40-49 |
T2fast |
sept_3_area |
136.7 (39.8) |
124.7 (41.1) |
50-59 |
T2 |
sept_1_area |
307.6 (172.2) |
378.1 (0.1) |
50-59 |
T2 |
sept_2_area |
208 (50.1) |
285.6 (64.7) |
50-59 |
T2 |
sept_3_area |
117 (39.2) |
189.2 (69.4) |
50-59 |
T2fast |
sept_1_area |
314.7 (157.1) |
380.7 (171.4) |
50-59 |
T2fast |
sept_2_area |
191.8 (58.3) |
219.3 (65.1) |
50-59 |
T2fast |
sept_3_area |
112.2 (28.3) |
176.4 (78.4) |
60-69 |
T2 |
sept_1_area |
246.4 (94.6) |
399.2 (136.7) |
60-69 |
T2 |
sept_2_area |
173.9 (41.7) |
212.2 (86.9) |
60-69 |
T2 |
sept_3_area |
86.8 (35.2) |
96.2 (37.4) |
60-69 |
T2fast |
sept_1_area |
214.7 (92.4) |
364.5 (159.4) |
60-69 |
T2fast |
sept_2_area |
175 (76) |
219.4 (105) |
60-69 |
T2fast |
sept_3_area |
84.9 (31.6) |
93 (15.8) |
Repeatability and Reproducibility
Repeatability for DL reconstructions
The bias, repeatability coefficient (RC), intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and 95% confidence interval comparing scan A vs B are tabulated in Table 10. Bland-Altman plots are shown in Figure 5.
Table 10: Repeatability analysis of T1 and T2.
MOLLI |
19.8 |
78.3 |
0.616 (0.527, 0.692) |
p<0.001 |
SMART |
7.5 |
114.7 |
0.516 (0.405, 0.612) |
p<0.001 |
T2 |
0.9 |
6.5 |
0.59 (0.494, 0.672) |
p<0.001 |
T2fast |
0.3 |
10.7 |
0.304 (0.175, 0.423) |
p<0.001 |
Between-system reproducibility
The bias, reproducibility coefficient (RC), intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and 95% confidence interval comparing scan A vs B are tabulated in Table 11. Bland-Altman plots are shown in Figure 6.
Table 11: Between-system reproducibility analysis of T1 and T2.
MOLLI |
4.4 |
113.3 |
0.601 (0.515, 0.675) |
p<0.001 |
SMART |
-4.3 |
148.7 |
0.45 (0.344, 0.545) |
p<0.001 |
T2 |
-0.4 |
10.4 |
0.41 (0.307, 0.503) |
p<0.001 |
T2fast |
-0.5 |
12.4 |
0.395 (0.285, 0.495) |
p<0.001 |
Between-sequence reproducibility
The bias, reproducibility coefficient (RC), intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and 95% confidence interval comparing MOLLI vs SMART and T2 vs T2fast are tabulated in Table 12. Bland-Altman plots are shown in Figure 7. (Non-inter-system: priority scan A \(\to\) B; inter-system: priority scan B \(\to\) A.) Bias for MOLLI vs SMART is substantial: SMART values are bigger, causing lack of agreement.
Table 12: Between-sequence reproducibility analysis of T1 and T2.
MOLLI vs SMART |
-228.6 |
142.9 |
-0.641 (-0.679, -0.601) |
p=1 |
T2 vs T2-fast |
-1.5 |
9.5 |
0.598 (0.554, 0.64) |
p<0.001 |
Between-recon reproducibility
The bias, reproducibility coefficient (RC), intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and 95% confidence interval comparing MOLLI: Std vs DL, T2: Std vs DL, and T2: DL vs GE are tabulated in Table 13. Bland-Altman plots are shown in Figure 8. (Non-inter-system: priority scan A \(\to\) B; inter-system: priority scan B \(\to\) A.) There is strong agreement within the three pairs of comparisons.
Table 13: Between-recon reproducibility analysis of T1 and T2.
MOLLI: Std vs DL |
-0.7 |
41.5 |
0.944 (0.936, 0.95) |
p<0.001 |
T2: Std vs DL |
0.1 |
3.1 |
0.951 (0.944, 0.956) |
p<0.001 |
T2: DL vs GE |
-0.6 |
3.8 |
0.906 (0.893, 0.918) |
p<0.001 |
Between-reader reproducibility
The bias, reproducibility coefficient (RC), intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and 95% confidence interval comparing RVS vs AF for MOLLI and T2 are tabulated in Table 14. Bland-Altman plots are shown in Figure 9. (Non-inter-system: priority scan A \(\to\) B; inter-system: priority scan B \(\to\) A.) The inter-reader agreement is strong.
Table 14: Between-reader (RVS vs AF) reproducibility analysis of MOLLI and T2.
MOLLI |
1.6 |
70.2 |
0.807 (0.765, 0.842) |
p<0.001 |
T2 |
0.8 |
6.4 |
0.711 (0.654, 0.76) |
p<0.001 |
References
Fleiss, Joseph L. 1971.
“Measuring Nominal Scale Agreement Among Many Raters.” Psychological Bulletin 76 (5): 378–82.
https://doi.org/10.1037/h0031619.