library(psych) # for the describe() command
library(car) # for the leveneTest() command
## Loading required package: carData
##
## Attaching package: 'car'
## The following object is masked from 'package:psych':
##
## logit
library(effsize) # for the cohen.d() command
##
## Attaching package: 'effsize'
## The following object is masked from 'package:psych':
##
## cohen.d
# for the homework: import the dataset you cleaned previously
# this will be the dataset you'll use throughout the rest of the semester
d <- read.csv(file="Data/arcdata_final.csv", header=T)
I predict that idividuals who do not identify as transgender will report higher self-esteem ratings, as measured by the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Inventory.
# you only need to check the variables you're using in the current analysis
# although you checked them previously, it's always a good idea to look them over again and be sure that everything is correct
str(d)
## 'data.frame': 1210 obs. of 7 variables:
## $ X : int 1 20 30 31 33 49 57 68 81 86 ...
## $ trans : chr "no" "no" "no" "no" ...
## $ ethnicity: chr "White - British, Irish, other" "White - British, Irish, other" "White - British, Irish, other" "White - British, Irish, other" ...
## $ rse : num 2.3 1.6 3.9 1.7 3.9 2.4 1.8 1.3 3.5 2.6 ...
## $ gad : num 1.86 3.86 1.14 2 1.43 ...
## $ support : num 2.5 2.17 5 2.5 3.67 ...
## $ mfq_26 : num 4.2 3.35 4.65 4.65 4.5 4.3 5.25 5 4.7 4.05 ...
d$trans <- as.factor(d$trans)
table(d$gender_rc, useNA = "always")
##
## <NA>
## 0
# you can use the describe() command on an entire datafrom (d) or just on a single variable (d$pss)
describe(d$rse)
## vars n mean sd median trimmed mad min max range skew kurtosis se
## X1 1 1210 2.63 0.72 2.7 2.64 0.74 1 4 3 -0.22 -0.72 0.02
# library(psychTools)
# installed.packages(psych)
# also use a histogram to examine your continuous variable
hist(d$rse)
# can use the describeBy() command to view the means and standard deviations by group
# it's very similar to the describe() command but splits the dataframe according to the 'group' variable
describeBy(d$rse, group=d$trans)
##
## Descriptive statistics by group
## group: no
## vars n mean sd median trimmed mad min max range skew kurtosis se
## X1 1 1132 2.66 0.7 2.7 2.68 0.74 1 4 3 -0.25 -0.65 0.02
## ------------------------------------------------------------
## group: Prefer not to say
## vars n mean sd median trimmed mad min max range skew kurtosis se
## X1 1 41 2.44 0.76 2.5 2.44 1.04 1 3.8 2.8 0.07 -0.93 0.12
## ------------------------------------------------------------
## group: yes
## vars n mean sd median trimmed mad min max range skew kurtosis se
## X1 1 37 1.89 0.67 1.7 1.82 0.59 1.1 3.7 2.6 0.94 0.11 0.11
# last, use a boxplot to examine your continuous and categorical variables together dp,iv
boxplot(d$rse~d$trans)
Some of these I can check in R, while others are down to my research design. These assumptions are confirmed by my research design, so I don’t have to do anything now:
This assumption is not met:
This assumption was confirmed in the section above:
So we only have one assumption to test:
# subetting to drop the nb group so that our IV only has two levels
d <- subset(d, trans != "Prefer not to say")
d$trans <- droplevels(d$trans) # using droplevels() to drop the empty factor
I can test whether the variances of my two groups are equal using Levene’s test. The null hypothesis is that the variance between the two groups is equal, which is the result we want. So when running Levene’s test I am hoping for a non-significant result!
# use the leveneTest() command from the car package to test homogeneity of variance
# install.packages("car")
# library(car)
# uses the same 'formula' setup that we'll use for our t-test: formula is y~x, where y is our DV and x is our IV
leveneTest(d$rse~d$trans, data = d)
## Levene's Test for Homogeneity of Variance (center = median)
## Df F value Pr(>F)
## group 1 0.8571 0.3548
## 1167
As you can see, the data is not statistically significant. When running a t-test, I can account for heterogeneity in my variance by using Welch’s t-test, which does not have the same assumptions as Student’s t-test (the default type of t-test) about variance.
My independent variable has more than two levels. To proceed with this analysis, I will drop the participants who answered “Prefer not to say” from my sample. I will make a note to discuss this issue in my Method write-up and in my Discussion as a limitation of my study.
# very simple! we specify the dataframe alongside the variables instead of having a separate argument for the dataframe like we did for leveneTest()
t_output <- t.test(d$rse~d$trans)
t_output
##
## Welch Two Sample t-test
##
## data: d$rse by d$trans
## t = 6.8315, df = 38.662, p-value = 3.816e-08
## alternative hypothesis: true difference in means between group no and group yes is not equal to 0
## 95 percent confidence interval:
## 0.5379348 0.9906489
## sample estimates:
## mean in group no mean in group yes
## 2.656184 1.891892
# once again, we use our formula to calculate cohen's d
d_output <- cohen.d(d$rse~d$trans)
d_output
##
## Cohen's d
##
## d estimate: 1.086064 (large)
## 95 percent confidence interval:
## lower upper
## 0.7553352 1.4167928
To test my hypothesis that individuals who do not identify as transgender report higher self-esteem ratings, I used an two-sample or independent t-test. This required me to drop those who answered “Prefer not to say” from my sample, as I am limited to a two-group comparison when using this test. I tested the homogeneity of variance with Levene’s test and found the homegeneity of variance to not be statisticaly significant (p = .35). My data met all other assumptions of a t-test.
As predicted, I found that those who do not identify as transgender (no = 2.66, SD = .7) reported significantly higher self esteem ratings than those who identify as transexual (yes = 1.89, SD = .67); t(38.66) = 6.83, p < .001 (see Figure 1). The effect size was calculated using Cohen’s d, with a value of 1.09 (large effect; Cohen, 1988).
References
Cohen J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. New York, NY: Routledge Academic.