Observational Ethogram of H. leucocephalus: A Study on Bald Eagle Behavior

Author
Affiliation

Brett Gilio

University of Central Missouri

Published

March 3, 2024

Introduction

The Bald Eagle, Haliaeetus leucocephalus, is a bird of prey native to North America, known for possessing a distinctive white head and tail against an otherwise dark brown body. H. leucocephalus is found across all of the contiguous United States, most of Canada, and the northern-most portions of Mexico (Garrett et al., 1993). H. leucocephalus is known as a sea eagle, which refers to the habitat and niche of the bird to be near large bodies of water satisfying the dietary preference for small mammals, reptiles, and various species of fish (Newsome et al., 2010). The nesting locations of this bird of prey is influenced by the habitat, rearing methods, and dietary preferences which confer ecological benefits. Old-growth forests near marshes or open waters are typical, especially in the presence of hard-wood conifer super-canopies (Mundahl et al., 2013).

There is considerable ecological significance to the behavior and nesting of H. leucocephalus; this bird of prey is a noted apex predator and keystone species. As such, significant conservation efforts have been made to track and investigate the species in population numbers, rearing behavior, and the preservation of their habitat (Bergen et al., 2022). H. leucocephalus is particularly well studied in courtship / mating, as well as its hunting behavior. It is common for this species of bird to harass and steal the catches from other birds of prey, such as the osprey (Hansen, 1986). However, human involvement in deforestation, commercial fishing, and hunting has resulted predicted shift in the range and behavior of this species (Bergen et al., 2022).

The frequency of hunting and stealing in comparison to the cost of risk of injury for H. leucocephalus. (Hansen, 1986)

This paper serves as an initial look at the behavior of H. leucocephalus. The subjects of this study are a pair of Bald Eagles in the southwestern region of Florida. More specifically, the subjects are a female adult and a juvenile aged approximately six months. This study will utilize a standard ethogram and activity budget approach in order to catalog and classify the frequencies of various behaviors. This approach provides a quantitative measure of specific behaviors and provides analytic support for the purpose of each behavior. The subjects of this study were observed using live-stream video capture and was reviewed multiple times for the purpose of ethogram construction and data gathering.

Methods & Materials

All observations were conducted by watching segments of the Southwest Florida Eagle Cam. Some observations were captured by observing segments of historical video footage. The segments of historical video footage was selected at random such that there was no duplication of viewed footage. The construction of the ethogram was conducted within a half-hour observation that was conducted on Monday, February 12th at 11:00 AM CST. This corresponds to the live-stream footage of 12:00 PM EST which was selected to increase the likelihood of observed behaviors displayed by the organisms. The produced ethogram includes other typical behaviors not observed within the initial window.

Behaviors and Descriptions for H. leucocephalus
Behavior Description
Hunting Fishing in or near rivers, lakes, and oceans.
Theft Taking food from other animals.
Courting Aerial displays and gift-giving to attract mates.
Mating Procreation, cloacal pressing.
Self Feeding Intake of food for self.
Directed Feeding Regurgitating food to young.
Social Feeding Sharing food with other eagles.
Self Grooming Cleaning feathers and preening of self.
Social Grooming Cleaning feathers and preening of other eagles.
Resting Resting in nests or on tree branches.
Sleeping Sleeping in nests or on tree branches.
Defending Territory Protecting nesting areas from other predators, standing guard.
Out of Nest Moving outside of nesting areas for food or migration.

The indicated behaviors stated in the proposed ethogram was then recorded four additional times. During this sequence of observations, the behaviors were recorded at increments of 30 minutes. These observations were taken twice during the day, and twice at night. In order to ascertain these time windows, recent historical video footage was utilized. The behaviors were timed by using a stop-watch for both the primary adult female and the primary juvenile. Data related to any foreign courting males were not reported for the purpose of this study.

Results

The various behaviors tracked in the ethogram are reported in the following bar plots. The first plot represents the discrete time data recorded for each of the four trials. The second plot represents the average time data across all four trials.

The findings above are of interest for a few different reasons. While the plots are not separated by adult and juvenile H. leucocephalus, it is clear that there are incidents of hunting and thieving which were exclusively performed by the fully matured eagle. The vast majority of sleep was performed by the fledgling juvenile who has not yet left the nest. There was some instances of sleep performed by the adult female, but the female was typically not present in the nest during the night. This is typical as adult eagles are diurnal and perch during the night away from the nest.

A six-month old juvenile sleeping in the nest. The adult female is out of nest on a perch. (Southwest Florida Eagle Cam)

In the later months of the development, the juvenile eagle was observed attempting to imitate the perching behavior of the adult female. This resulted in the juvenile being attacked by an owl and falling off the perch. However, the juvenile does have fledgling feathers and was able to recover back to the nest in the morning after the attack. The adult female eagle was not visible during this attack.

A juvenile eagle being attacked by an owl at night. (Southwest Florida Eagle Cam)

A significant amount of time was spent on feeding by the juvenile and the adult. The feeding behavior was typically constitutive of self and directed feeding by the adult, where directed feeding is the process of regurgitation delivery to the juvenile. However, as the juvenile continued to develop, the regurgitation directed feeding declined and was replaced by social feeding where the adult and juvenile shared hunted or stolen prey.

An adult female and a six-month old juvenile engage in social feeding behavior. (Southwest Florida Eagle Cam)

There was one lone instance of another adult eagle entering the nest. Sexing the foreign individual was difficult, however it is presumed that this was a male eagle engaging in courtship through the procurement and placement of nesting material. It is notable that this behavior took place only after the fledgling juvenile was out of the nest, but the juvenile did return to the nest later that same day.

An adult female being courted by a presumed adult male through gift-giving of nesting materials. (Southwest Florida Eagle Cam)

Finally, there were moments of social and self grooming. The social grooming was mostly directed from the adult female to the juvenile, often resulting in the use of feathers as nesting material. The juvenile then began to adopt more consistent self grooming behaviors and further reinforcing the behavior of using the loose feathers for the purpose of nest building.

Discussion

The findings raise several questions, including those related to the debate on nature versus nurture in behavior, and the significance of raising young fledglings for gaining a competitive edge in lineage continuation. The observations further suggest that adult eagles, particularly the adult female, engage in behaviors such as hunting, thieving, and social feeding that are not only for the immediate benefit of survival, but also serve as a demonstration for the juvenile. The decline in regurgitation feeding as the juvenile matures, replaced by social feeding, indicates a shift toward encouraged independence. The adult’s absence during the night, coupled with the juvenile’s attempt at imitating perching further suggest that these experiences are critical for learning risk assessment and recovery skills.

Additionally, the sequence of events from social feeding and from being the primary recipient of grooming to engaging in self-grooming and nest building illustrates a progression in the juvenile’s behavior that mirrors adult behavior. The adult female’s grooming of the juvenile and the subsequent use of feathers for nesting material by the juvenile suggests an adaptive learning process through imitation.

The social demonstrative behaviors tracked in the ethogram were compared in a separate study on the effects of human activity on breeding bald eagles. This study spent time observing both the courting and rearing behavior of bald eagles and the influence that human presence has on the activity budgeting of the species. The study found that the treatment found a significant decrease in preening, nest building, and brooding nestlings as well as hunting, thieving, social and directed feeding, as well as perching (Steidl & Anthony, 2000).

Finally, game theory has been applied to the behavioral ecology of H. leucocephalus. The research has been directed at the distinction between hunting and thieving behavior as an assessment of risk and feeding strategy. The paper targeted the viability of each strategy in acquiring food for self and juveniles. While the feature of learning was not expressly, it has been investigated in reference to evolutionary success among animals in general (Harley, 1981). As a consequence it can be inferred that the thieving strategy is a learned behavior by the fledgling as the feeding behavior of the juvenile changes throughout development (Hansen, 1986). The approach of integrating learning behavior as an adaptive strategy to competitive success in bald eagles should be further investigated.

Citations

Bergen, S., Huso, M. M., Duerr, A. E., Braham, M. A., Katzner, T. E., Schmuecker, S., & Miller, T. A. (2022). Classifying behavior from short‐interval biologging data: An example with GPS tracking of birds. Ecology and Evolution, 12(2), e08395. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.8395
Garrett, M. G., Watson, J. W., & Anthony, R. G. (1993). Bald Eagle Home Range and Habitat Use in the Columbia River Estuary. The Journal of Wildlife Management, 57(1), 19. https://doi.org/10.2307/3808995
Hansen, A. J. (1986). Fighting Behavior in Bald Eagles: A Test of Game Theory. Ecology, 67(3), 787–797. https://doi.org/10.2307/1937701
Harley, C. B. (1981). Learning the evolutionarily stable strategy. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 89(4), 611–633. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5193(81)90032-1
Mundahl, N. D., Bilyeu, A. G., & Maas, L. (2013). Bald Eagle Nesting Habitats in the Upper Mississippi River National Wildlife and Fish Refuge. Journal of Fish and Wildlife Management, 4(2), 362–376. https://doi.org/10.3996/012012-JFWM-009.1
Newsome, S. D., Collins, P. W., Rick, T. C., Guthrie, D. A., Erlandson, J. M., & Fogel, M. L. (2010). Pleistocene to historic shifts in bald eagle diets on the Channel Islands, California. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(20), 9246–9251. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0913011107
Steidl, R. J., & Anthony, R. G. (2000). EXPERIMENTAL EFFECTS OF HUMAN ACTIVITYON BREEDING BALD EAGLES. Ecological Applications, 10(1), 258–268. https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(2000)010[0258:EEOHAB]2.0.CO;2