Week 15 Results of Norfolk in Chance 2023-24 Fantasy Hockey Season"
As Week 15 of the “Norfolk in Chance” fantasy hockey league wraps up, let’s dive into the highlights and lowlights with tables showcasing the best and worst performances in each category.
Week 15 Best Performances
| Category | Team | Value |
|---|---|---|
| Goals (G) | Broad Street Bullies’ | 18 |
| Assists (A) | Ginga Ninja/Peterpumpkineater69 | 28 |
| Plus/Minus (+/-) | Killing Them Softly | +22 |
| Penalty Minutes (PIM) | There are no goalies | 60 |
| Power Play Points (PPP) | Broad Street Bullies’ | 18 |
| Shots on Goal (SOG) | TEE2GREEN/Ginga Ninja | 115 |
| Hits (HIT) | Rock ’Em Sock ’Em Robots/There are no goalies | 66 |
| Blocks (BLK) | Rock ’Em Sock ’Em Robots | 69 |
| Wins (W) | Banger Catz and others | 5 |
| Goals Against (GA) | God Save the Quinn/Koala-ty Franchise | 6 |
| Saves (SV) | There are no goalies | 207 |
Week 15 Worst Performances
| Category | Team | Value |
|---|---|---|
| Goals (G) | Shot to the Hart/Back2Back?/Rock ’Em Sock ’Em Robots | 6 |
| Assists (A) | Mathletes | 12 |
| Plus/Minus (+/-) | Ginga Ninja | -17 |
| Penalty Minutes (PIM) | Three teams | 12 |
| Power Play Points (PPP) | There are no goalies | 2 |
| Shots on Goal (SOG) | Shot to the Hart | 78 |
| Hits (HIT) | TEE2GREEN | 21 |
| Blocks (BLK) | Three teams | 32 |
| Wins (W) | Five teams | 1 |
| Goals Against (GA) | There are no goalies | 26 |
| Saves (SV) | Mathletes | 79 |
In the world of rotisserie rankings, “Broad Street Bullies’” topped the chart with a stellar RotoScore of 11.6, thanks to impressive performances across multiple categories, especially in goals, assists, and power play points. “Killing Them Softly” followed closely with a RotoScore of 11.5, dominated by their unmatched plus/minus rating and a strong showing in shots on goal.
On the flip side, “Shot to the Hart” and “Back2Back?” faced challenges this week, with some of the lowest scores in key categories like goals and assists. “Mathletes” also struggled, particularly in the goaltending department, reflected in their goals against and saves.
As we navigate through the heart of the season, the competition in the “Norfolk in Chance” league is heating up. The best are striving to maintain their dominance, while the underdogs are looking for ways to turn the tide. Stay tuned for more action as we head into Week 16!
| Team.Name | RotoScore | OpponentRotoScore |
|---|---|---|
| Broad Street Bullies’ | 11.6 | 11.5 |
| Killing Them Softly | 11.5 | 11.6 |
| TEE2GREEN | 11.2 | 10.8 |
| Ginga Ninja | 10.8 | 11.2 |
| Banger Catz | 10.5 | 8.8 |
| Koala-ty Franchise | 10.3 | 9.5 |
| Peterpumpkineater69 | 10.0 | 9.2 |
| God Save the Quinn | 9.5 | 5.4 |
| The Mighty Ducks | 9.5 | 10.3 |
| There are no goalies | 9.2 | 10.0 |
| Rock ‘Em Sock ‘Em Robots | 8.9 | 5.2 |
| Hungry for Apples? | 8.8 | 10.5 |
| As Gudas It Gets! | 8.4 | 8.3 |
| Champagne Campaign | 8.3 | 8.4 |
| Mathletes | 6.8 | 6.3 |
| The Untouchables | 6.3 | 6.8 |
| Shot to the Hart | 5.4 | 9.5 |
| Back2Back? | 5.2 | 8.9 |
| Team Name | G | A | +/- | PIM | PPP | SOG | HIT | BLK | W | GA | SV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| God Save the Quinn | 12 | 17 | 9 | 23 | 7 | 79 | 41 | 37 | 4 | 6 | 124 |
| Shot to the Hart | 6 | 15 | -9 | 18 | 6 | 78 | 44 | 51 | 2 | 12 | 92 |
| Banger Catz | 13 | 16 | -1 | 32 | 4 | 99 | 50 | 32 | 5 | 13 | 201 |
| Hungry for Apples? | 8 | 14 | 16 | 30 | 5 | 90 | 59 | 60 | 1 | 22 | 156 |
| Broad Street Bullies’ | 18 | 21 | 2 | 32 | 18 | 98 | 28 | 46 | 2 | 9 | 106 |
| Killing Them Softly | 12 | 21 | 22 | 29 | 7 | 115 | 60 | 55 | 1 | 11 | 92 |
| Champagne Campaign | 7 | 17 | -7 | 24 | 9 | 79 | 41 | 47 | 4 | 11 | 145 |
| As Gudas It Gets! | 9 | 22 | -1 | 12 | 6 | 92 | 49 | 54 | 1 | 20 | 177 |
| Back2Back? | 6 | 15 | -10 | 27 | 4 | 81 | 59 | 36 | 1 | 11 | 89 |
| Rock ‘Em Sock ‘Em Robots | 6 | 16 | -2 | 22 | 7 | 102 | 66 | 69 | 2 | 16 | 105 |
| There are no goalies | 10 | 14 | 0 | 60 | 2 | 101 | 66 | 32 | 2 | 26 | 207 |
| Peterpumpkineater69 | 11 | 28 | 5 | 31 | 14 | 84 | 31 | 37 | 2 | 12 | 121 |
| Mathletes | 13 | 12 | -2 | 22 | 9 | 93 | 43 | 32 | 1 | 7 | 79 |
| The Untouchables | 8 | 13 | -4 | 12 | 5 | 93 | 30 | 43 | 4 | 14 | 152 |
| Koala-ty Franchise | 9 | 22 | -2 | 23 | 6 | 88 | 50 | 56 | 3 | 6 | 116 |
| The Mighty Ducks | 8 | 20 | -3 | 37 | 5 | 96 | 50 | 59 | 2 | 10 | 90 |
| TEE2GREEN | 16 | 19 | 14 | 26 | 11 | 115 | 21 | 37 | 4 | 19 | 166 |
| Ginga Ninja | 14 | 28 | -17 | 12 | 17 | 115 | 48 | 51 | 4 | 24 | 182 |
Players of the Week
Top Performers of the Week
This section celebrates the top-performing players of the week. Each player listed below has shown exceptional performance and has been a key player for their respective fantasy teams.
| Name | Team | GP | G | A | PTS | PPP | SOG | +/- | PIM | Hits | Blocks | Team Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KIRILL KAPRIZOV | MIN | 4 | 5 | 3 | 8 | 4 | 16 | 3 | 6 | 3 | 3 | Broad Street Bullies’ |
| JOEL ERIKSSON EK | MIN | 4 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 3 | 18 | 5 | 2 | 5 | 5 | Killing Them Softly |
| BROCK FABER | MIN | 4 | 1 | 6 | 7 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 8 | 2 | 7 | Broad Street Bullies’ |
| DAVID PASTRNAK | BOS | 3 | 5 | 2 | 7 | 2 | 19 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | God Save the Quinn |
| AUSTON MATTHEWS | TOR | 4 | 5 | 3 | 8 | 1 | 19 | 5 | 0 | 4 | 3 | TEE2GREEN |
| CALE MAKAR | COL | 4 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 2 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 10 | Ginga Ninja |
| ELIAS PETTERSSON | VAN | 3 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 8 | -1 | 2 | 5 | 1 | Broad Street Bullies’ |
| J.T. MILLER | VAN | 3 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 3 | -1 | 2 | 6 | 2 | Ginga Ninja |
| VICTOR HEDMAN | T.B | 3 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 13 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 5 | Champagne Campaign |
| ADAM FOX | NYR | 4 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 6 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 10 | Peterpumpkineater69 |
Worst Players of the Week
This section highlights the players who faced significant challenges this week. Each player listed below had a tough week on the ice and will be looking to bounce back in their upcoming matches. Their resilience and determination to improve will be crucial for their respective fantasy teams.
| Name | Team | GP | G | A | PTS | PPP | SOG | +/- | PIM | Hits | Blocks | Team Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TYLER BERTUZZI | TOR | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | Rock ‘Em Sock ‘Em Robots |
| ANZE KOPITAR | L.A | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | -4 | 0 | 2 | 1 | Banger Catz |
| TEUVO TERAVAINEN | CAR | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | Rock ‘Em Sock ‘Em Robots |
| ALEXIS LAFRENIERE | NYR | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | -4 | 0 | 6 | 0 | The Untouchables |
| ALEX DEBRINCAT | DET | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | Broad Street Bullies’ |
| RYAN STROME | ANA | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | -5 | 4 | 5 | 2 | Killing Them Softly |
| MATT DUCHENE | DAL | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 6 | -1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | Banger Catz |
| SEBASTIAN AHO | NYI | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | -4 | 0 | 5 | 3 | Ginga Ninja |
| TAGE THOMPSON | BUF | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | -2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | The Untouchables |
| LUCAS RAYMOND | DET | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | -3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | The Mighty Ducks |
Assessing the Remaining Strength of Schedule
The concept of “Remaining Strength of Schedule” based on opponent rotisserie scores in a fantasy sports context is an important strategic tool that can significantly impact decision-making for team managers. Let’s break down what this means and how it can be utilized:
Understanding Rotisserie Scoring
First, it’s essential to understand rotisserie (or “roto”) scoring, a common system used in fantasy sports leagues. In this system, teams are ranked from best to worst in each statistical category. Points are then awarded according to these rankings. For example, in a 10-team league, the top team in a category might receive 10 points, the next team 9 points, and so on, down to the last team, which receives 1 point.
Strength of Schedule (SoS)
| Team Name | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ginga Ninja | 7.9 | 8.8 | 8.5 | 9.8 | 8.4 | 8.4 | 7.5 | 8.47 |
| Killing Them Softly | 9.1 | 7.6 | 10.1 | 7.9 | 7.9 | 8.5 | 8.4 | 8.50 |
| Rock ‘Em Sock ‘Em Robots | 8.4 | 9.0 | 9.1 | 7.6 | 10.1 | 7.9 | 7.9 | 8.57 |
| God Save the Quinn | 9.0 | 9.1 | 7.6 | 10.1 | 7.9 | 7.9 | 8.5 | 8.59 |
| Mathletes | 7.6 | 10.1 | 7.9 | 7.9 | 8.5 | 8.4 | 11.0 | 8.77 |
| Banger Catz | 9.8 | 8.4 | 9.0 | 9.1 | 7.6 | 10.1 | 7.9 | 8.84 |
| Champagne Campaign | 7.9 | 7.9 | 11.0 | 8.4 | 7.5 | 9.6 | 9.7 | 8.86 |
| Peterpumpkineater69 | 10.1 | 7.9 | 7.9 | 8.5 | 11.0 | 7.5 | 9.6 | 8.93 |
| TEE2GREEN | 8.8 | 9.8 | 8.4 | 9.0 | 9.1 | 7.6 | 10.1 | 8.97 |
| Hungry for Apples? | 8.2 | 11.0 | 9.8 | 8.4 | 9.0 | 9.1 | 7.6 | 9.01 |
| As Gudas It Gets! | 8.4 | 7.5 | 9.6 | 9.7 | 11.0 | 8.9 | 8.2 | 9.04 |
| Back2Back? | 8.9 | 8.2 | 8.8 | 11.0 | 8.4 | 9.0 | 9.1 | 9.06 |
| Koala-ty Franchise | 8.5 | 8.4 | 7.5 | 9.6 | 9.7 | 11.0 | 8.9 | 9.09 |
| There are no goalies | 7.5 | 9.6 | 9.7 | 11.0 | 8.9 | 8.2 | 8.8 | 9.10 |
| Broad Street Bullies’ | 9.7 | 11.0 | 8.9 | 8.2 | 8.8 | 9.8 | 8.4 | 9.26 |
| The Mighty Ducks | 11.0 | 8.5 | 8.4 | 7.5 | 9.6 | 9.7 | 11.0 | 9.39 |
| The Untouchables | 9.6 | 9.7 | 11.0 | 8.9 | 8.2 | 8.8 | 9.8 | 9.43 |
| Shot to the Hart | 11.0 | 8.9 | 8.2 | 8.8 | 9.8 | 11.0 | 9.0 | 9.53 |
Reminder: $2 Contest Upcoming Saturday January 27th
Next Saturday there will be another contest. This time - the team with the most Hits+Blocks+PIMS will win the prize!
Norfolk in Chance Team Logos by AI
Team Name Marketability Rankings
Welcome to the rankings of the most marketable fantasy hockey team names from the Norfolk in Chance league! The art of crafting the perfect team name is a blend of wit, relevance, and creativity. A great name resonates with fans, sparks interest, and becomes a staple of league banter. In the spirit of friendly competition and branding genius, we’ve meticulously evaluated the 18 team names submitted by our imaginative managers.
Our evaluation is based on a comprehensive rubric that grades each name across six key dimensions: Brand Appeal, Originality, Memorability, Relevance to Hockey, Humor, and Family-Friendliness. Each category is crucial for a name to not only capture the essence of the team but also to stand out in a sea of creativity. A name with high Brand Appeal will have a strong potential for merchandise and recognition beyond the league itself. Originality ensures that the name isn’t lost in the cliches. Memorability is what keeps the team in the minds of league members and onlookers long after the games are over. The Relevance to Hockey category connects the name to the heart of the sport. Humor can make a name beloved and engaging, while Family-Friendliness ensures that the name is appropriate and accessible to fans of all ages.
Without further ado, let’s dive into the rankings and see which names shoot to score and which ones may need to spend a little more time in the penalty box of creativity. Each team name has been thoughtfully scored to reflect its potential in the competitive arena of marketability. So lace up your skates, and let’s hit the ice with these rankings!
1. The Mighty Ducks - Brand Appeal: 5 (Iconic, connects with a well-known franchise) - Originality: 3 (Familiar due to the movie series, not unique) - Memorability: 5 (Easily remembered because of the movie reference) - Relevance to Hockey: 5 (Direct connection to the sport through pop culture) - Humor: 3 (The name itself isn’t humorous, but it’s light-hearted) - Family-Friendliness: 5 (Appropriate for all ages)
2. Broad Street Bullies - Brand Appeal: 5 (Strong connection to hockey history) - Originality: 4 (Well-known among hockey fans, not widely outside) - Memorability: 5 (Memorable for its historical reference) - Relevance to Hockey: 5 (Directly related to the Philadelphia Flyers) - Humor: 2 (Not particularly humorous, more tough-sounding) - Family-Friendliness: 4 (Slightly aggressive but generally okay)
3. Rock ’Em Sock ’Em Robots - Brand Appeal: 4 (Nostalgic and broadly appealing) - Originality: 4 (Creative adaptation of a toy name) - Memorability: 5 (Catchy and distinctive) - Relevance to Hockey: 3 (Metaphorically related to on-ice clashes) - Humor: 3 (Playfully competitive) - Family-Friendliness: 5 (Kid-friendly and fun)
4. God Save the Quinn - Brand Appeal: 4 (Clever and could be catchy if relevant to a player) - Originality: 4 (Smart play on words) - Memorability: 4 (Sticks if you get the reference) - Relevance to Hockey: 4 (If related to a hockey figure named Quinn) - Humor: 3 (Witty but not laugh-out-loud funny) - Family-Friendliness: 5 (Clean and harmless)
5. Hungry for Apples? - Brand Appeal: 3 (Quirky, could stand out) - Originality: 4 (Unique, not an obvious hockey name) - Memorability: 4 (Odd enough to be memorable) - Relevance to Hockey: 2 (Indirect relevance, if any) - Humor: 4 (Amusing and light) - Family-Friendliness: 5 (Wholesome and approachable)
6. Koala-ty Franchise - Brand Appeal: 3 (Pun may be appealing) - Originality: 4 (Clever play on words) - Memorability: 4 (Puns tend to stick) - Relevance to Hockey: 2 (Not directly related to hockey) - Humor: 4 (Punny and fun) - Family-Friendliness: 5 (Clean humor)
7. Ginga Ninja - Brand Appeal: 3 (Depends on the association with a player or concept) - Originality: 4 (Stands out for its rhyming) - Memorability: 4 (Rhymes are catchy) - Relevance to Hockey: 2 (Not inherently hockey-related) - Humor: 3 (Mildly amusing) - Family-Friendliness: 5 (No issues with appropriateness)
8. Shot to the Hart - Brand Appeal: 4 (Good if it relates to the Hart Trophy or a player) - Originality: 4 (Nice play on words) - Memorability: 4 (The wordplay makes it memorable) - Relevance to Hockey: 5 (Directly relevant if tied to the trophy) - Humor: 3 (Subtle wit) - Family-Friendliness: 5 (Entirely appropriate)
9. Back2Back? - Brand Appeal: 4 (Suggests a winning streak which is marketable) - Originality: 3 (Concept not uncommon in sports) - Memorability: 3 (Might blend in with other sports references) - Relevance to Hockey: 3 (Relevant to any team sport) - Humor: 2 (Not particularly funny) - Family-Friendliness: 5 (No issues)
10. TEE2GREEN - Brand Appeal: 2 (More golf-related than hockey) - Originality: 3 (Not original in sports but unique in hockey) - Memorability: 3 (Could be memorable if the logo is distinctive) - Relevance to Hockey: 1 (Not relevant to hockey) - Humor: 2 (No humor involved) - Family-Friendliness: 5 (Family-friendly)
11. Champagne Campaign - Brand Appeal: 3 (Celebratory, could be seen as aspirational) - Originality: 3 (Not particularly unique) - Memorability: 3 (Fairly standard phrase) - Relevance to Hockey: 2 (Celebration is universal, not hockey-specific) - Humor: 2 (Not funny, but has a positive connotation) - Family-Friendliness: 4 (Slightly less so due to alcohol reference)
12. As Gudas It Gets! - Brand Appeal: 4 (Witty, especially if Radko Gudas is relevant) - Originality: 4 (Good wordplay) - Memorability: 4 (The pun makes it stick) - Relevance to Hockey: 5 (Directly relevant with the player’s name) - Humor: 3 (Clever rather than funny) - Family-Friendliness: 5 (Appropriate for all)
13. The Untouchables - Brand Appeal: 3 (Conveys strength) - Originality: 3 (Common phrase used in various contexts) - Memorability: 3 (Not overly memorable) - Relevance to Hockey: 2 (Metaphoric at best) - Humor: 2 (Serious tone) - Family-Friendliness: 5 (No issues)
14. Banger Catz - Brand Appeal: 3 (Energetic, youthful vibe) - Originality: 3 (Slightly quirky) - Memorability: 3 (Average) - Relevance to Hockey: 2 (Indirect, more general sports) - Humor: 3 (Light-hearted) - Family-Friendliness: 4 (Mostly fine, though “banger” has varied connotations)
15. Killing Them Softly - Brand Appeal: 3 (Interesting, could stand out) - Originality: 4 (Distinctive phrase in a sports context) - Memorability: 3 (May be remembered for its uniqueness) - Relevance to Hockey: 2 (Not clearly related to hockey) - Humor: 3 (Mildly witty) - Family-Friendliness: 4 (Slightly aggressive undertone)
16. Mathletes - Brand Appeal: 2 (Niche appeal) - Originality: 4 (Unusual for a hockey team) - Memorability: 3 (Could be memorable for its difference) - Relevance to Hockey: 1 (Not related to hockey) - Humor: 2 (Not inherently funny) - Family-Friendliness: 5 (Appropriate for all)
17. Peterpumpkineater69 - Brand Appeal: 2 (The number may detract from widespread appeal) - Originality: 4 (Certainly unique) - Memorability: 3 (Memorable for its oddity) - Relevance to Hockey: 1 (No relevance) - Humor: 3 (Humor depends on the audience) - Family-Friendliness: 2 (The number 69 may not be considered appropriate)
18. There are no goalies - Brand Appeal: 2 (Very specific, might limit appeal) - Originality: 4 (Quite unique for a hockey team) - Memorability: 4 (The uniqueness makes it memorable) - Relevance to Hockey: 4 (Direct reference to a hockey position) - Humor: 4 (Funny for those in the know) - Family-Friendliness: 5 (No inappropriate content)
These grades are based on subjective assessment and intended to provide an entertaining perspective on how these names might be received in terms of marketability.
Rotisserie Scores for the Season
The rotisserie scores reflect the cumulative performance of each team over the season. The higher the score, the better the team’s overall performance across various categories. Let’s take a closer look at the current season’s rotisserie scores for each team.
| Team Name | Total | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ginga Ninja | 11.0 | 11.0 | 9.8 | 10.6 | 12.0 | 11.4 | 10.8 | 12.0 | 11.6 | 9.7 | 12.9 | 8.6 | 10.3 | 12.8 | 10.9 | 10.8 |
| Rock ‘Em Sock ‘Em Robots | 11.0 | 13.0 | 10.8 | 10.5 | 10.5 | 9.4 | 11.5 | 11.3 | 12.4 | 13.5 | 8.6 | 10.6 | 10.3 | 11.5 | 12.0 | 8.9 |
| As Gudas It Gets! | 10.1 | 11.5 | 8.1 | 7.6 | 9.4 | 9.0 | 13.1 | 11.8 | 6.1 | 10.5 | 13.8 | 12.9 | 8.6 | 10.3 | 10.6 | 8.4 |
| Back2Back? | 9.8 | 7.9 | 9.1 | 12.6 | 10.1 | 9.1 | 8.4 | 9.3 | 9.5 | 11.2 | 10.4 | 11.9 | 10.6 | 10.1 | 11.4 | 5.2 |
| God Save the Quinn | 9.7 | 10.4 | 9.9 | 9.1 | 10.2 | 10.3 | 8.7 | 10.9 | 8.8 | 11.6 | 9.3 | 9.0 | 10.1 | 9.2 | 9.2 | 9.5 |
| Killing Them Softly | 9.6 | 10.1 | 9.4 | 11.5 | 12.5 | 11.8 | 6.4 | 8.0 | 10.0 | 7.3 | 9.2 | 6.6 | 10.8 | 9.8 | 9.1 | 11.5 |
| The Untouchables | 9.1 | 11.8 | 5.7 | 8.4 | 8.4 | 10.5 | 10.5 | 8.9 | 10.2 | 9.8 | 11.2 | 9.8 | 7.1 | 9.5 | 8.1 | 6.3 |
| Broad Street Bullies’ | 9.0 | 11.1 | 11.5 | 7.5 | 10.0 | 11.1 | 6.1 | 6.9 | 9.6 | 11.1 | 6.3 | 9.7 | 9.1 | 6.4 | 6.5 | 11.6 |
| Banger Catz | 8.9 | 8.5 | 6.9 | 8.4 | 10.8 | 8.1 | 11.3 | 8.3 | 10.6 | 6.5 | 9.0 | 10.3 | 10.6 | 7.3 | 7.0 | 10.5 |
| Hungry for Apples? | 8.8 | 7.5 | 12.8 | 12.6 | 6.5 | 8.8 | 9.3 | 6.8 | 8.5 | 9.1 | 9.3 | 7.5 | 8.5 | 9.9 | 6.8 | 8.8 |
| Champagne Campaign | 8.5 | 10.1 | 8.8 | 6.8 | 7.6 | 9.1 | 10.0 | 6.9 | 7.6 | 9.4 | 5.6 | 7.0 | 7.5 | 12.6 | 9.9 | 8.3 |
| Peterpumpkineater69 | 8.4 | 7.1 | 6.6 | 9.6 | 7.4 | 5.6 | 7.5 | 11.4 | 11.4 | 7.6 | 7.0 | 8.1 | 10.0 | 7.6 | 9.0 | 10.0 |
| Shot to the Hart | 8.4 | 8.5 | 10.8 | 5.0 | 5.8 | 9.7 | 10.1 | 9.1 | 9.7 | 8.4 | 7.5 | 8.4 | 11.3 | 8.4 | 7.5 | 5.4 |
| TEE2GREEN | 8.2 | 7.5 | 9.0 | 8.4 | 7.7 | 7.6 | 6.9 | 7.8 | 5.8 | 8.3 | 9.9 | 9.2 | 6.4 | 8.7 | 8.8 | 11.2 |
| The Mighty Ducks | 7.9 | 5.8 | 6.8 | 10.8 | 8.5 | 9.4 | 10.9 | 6.5 | 7.5 | 8.3 | 9.4 | 7.9 | 6.2 | 4.1 | 6.8 | 9.5 |
| Koala-ty Franchise | 7.9 | 6.2 | 7.5 | 11.5 | 11.2 | 5.0 | 8.5 | 9.0 | 6.2 | 6.0 | 5.9 | 7.4 | 8.2 | 6.5 | 8.8 | 10.3 |
| There are no goalies | 7.6 | 4.9 | 7.7 | 4.7 | 4.5 | 9.4 | 7.9 | 7.5 | 6.2 | 9.1 | 9.1 | 7.6 | 8.1 | 9.4 | 9.2 | 9.2 |
| Mathletes | 7.5 | 6.0 | 8.6 | 5.6 | 7.5 | 6.3 | 5.5 | 8.9 | 8.4 | 5.4 | 8.3 | 7.6 | 8.3 | 9.4 | 9.9 | 6.8 |
| Team Name | Total | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| There are no goalies | 9.4 | 10.4 | 10.8 | 8.4 | 7.7 | 8.8 | 8.4 | 9.1 | 9.6 | 9.8 | 12.9 | 12.9 | 8.2 | 4.1 | 9.9 | 10.0 |
| Shot to the Hart | 9.4 | 7.5 | 12.8 | 12.6 | 12.0 | 11.1 | 10.5 | 7.5 | 6.1 | 6.0 | 9.4 | 7.0 | 10.0 | 9.4 | 9.1 | 9.5 |
| The Mighty Ducks | 9.3 | 7.1 | 8.6 | 11.5 | 10.2 | 9.4 | 11.3 | 7.8 | 8.5 | 11.2 | 7.5 | 9.7 | 7.1 | 9.4 | 10.6 | 10.3 |
| Hungry for Apples? | 9.3 | 7.9 | 10.8 | 7.5 | 8.4 | 9.4 | 13.1 | 9.0 | 7.5 | 9.4 | 7.0 | 7.6 | 10.8 | 9.2 | 12.0 | 10.5 |
| Peterpumpkineater69 | 9.3 | 5.8 | 8.8 | 10.6 | 7.5 | 11.8 | 8.7 | 11.3 | 10.6 | 8.3 | 9.3 | 11.9 | 11.3 | 6.4 | 8.1 | 9.2 |
| As Gudas It Gets! | 9.3 | 10.1 | 9.9 | 10.5 | 10.8 | 7.6 | 9.3 | 9.3 | 9.7 | 11.1 | 11.2 | 7.6 | 10.3 | 6.5 | 6.8 | 8.3 |
| Killing Them Softly | 9.2 | 11.5 | 7.5 | 10.8 | 7.6 | 5.6 | 5.5 | 12.0 | 8.8 | 13.5 | 9.0 | 9.2 | 8.5 | 10.1 | 7.5 | 11.6 |
| The Untouchables | 9.2 | 13.0 | 6.9 | 8.4 | 6.5 | 9.1 | 10.1 | 6.9 | 11.6 | 9.1 | 13.8 | 7.4 | 6.2 | 12.6 | 9.0 | 6.8 |
| Broad Street Bullies’ | 9.1 | 8.5 | 9.0 | 12.6 | 10.1 | 9.7 | 10.8 | 8.9 | 6.2 | 10.5 | 5.9 | 7.9 | 7.5 | 7.6 | 9.9 | 11.5 |
| Champagne Campaign | 9.0 | 11.0 | 6.6 | 5.6 | 12.5 | 10.3 | 11.5 | 8.3 | 5.8 | 9.1 | 10.4 | 8.4 | 9.1 | 9.5 | 9.2 | 8.4 |
| Rock ‘Em Sock ‘Em Robots | 8.9 | 11.8 | 7.7 | 7.6 | 11.2 | 9.4 | 10.0 | 11.4 | 8.4 | 7.3 | 9.3 | 8.6 | 10.6 | 8.7 | 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Ginga Ninja | 8.8 | 10.1 | 9.1 | 9.6 | 5.8 | 6.3 | 6.1 | 8.0 | 10.2 | 11.6 | 9.1 | 10.6 | 8.6 | 7.3 | 8.8 | 11.2 |
| God Save the Quinn | 8.7 | 4.9 | 8.1 | 11.5 | 8.5 | 9.1 | 7.5 | 8.9 | 10.0 | 9.7 | 8.6 | 10.3 | 6.4 | 9.9 | 11.4 | 5.4 |
| Koala-ty Franchise | 8.6 | 6.0 | 9.4 | 9.1 | 10.5 | 8.1 | 6.9 | 6.8 | 9.5 | 8.4 | 6.3 | 9.8 | 8.1 | 10.3 | 10.9 | 9.5 |
| Banger Catz | 8.6 | 11.1 | 5.7 | 4.7 | 9.4 | 5.0 | 10.9 | 6.9 | 11.4 | 5.4 | 9.2 | 9.0 | 10.3 | 12.8 | 8.8 | 8.8 |
| Back2Back? | 8.5 | 7.5 | 9.8 | 5.0 | 10.0 | 10.5 | 7.9 | 11.8 | 6.2 | 8.3 | 5.6 | 8.1 | 8.3 | 9.8 | 9.2 | 8.9 |
| TEE2GREEN | 8.4 | 8.5 | 11.5 | 8.4 | 4.5 | 9.0 | 8.5 | 6.5 | 7.6 | 7.6 | 8.3 | 6.6 | 10.1 | 11.5 | 7.0 | 10.8 |
| Mathletes | 8.3 | 6.2 | 6.8 | 6.8 | 7.4 | 11.4 | 6.4 | 10.9 | 12.4 | 6.5 | 9.9 | 7.5 | 10.6 | 8.4 | 6.5 | 6.3 |
This report was last run: 2024-01-22 15:10:44