Attaching package: 'dplyr'The following objects are masked from 'package:stats':
filter, lagThe following objects are masked from 'package:base':
intersect, setdiff, setequal, unionIce Hockey
Ice hockey, from a statistical mindset, involves the analysis and interpretation of numerical data to understand various aspects of the sport. Here’s a breakdown of how statistical thinking can be applied to ice hockey:
Scoring Metrics: Evaluate players based on scoring metrics such as goals, assists, and points. Analyze which team’s allow for continuous success.
Wins and Losses: Analyze team performance by examining the win-loss record. Identify patterns or trends in how teams perform over different periods or against specific opponents.
Tailoring Fan Experiences: Understand fan preferences and engagement through statistical analysis of viewer data. Tailor fan experiences by identifying trends in viewer demographics, preferences, and behaviors during games. (which can be view to prepare by understanding the history of the team)
In essence, ice hockey provides a data-driven approach to understanding and optimizing player and team performance, making informed decisions, and enhancing the overall experience for players and fans alike.
Question Line of Inquiry
After playing Ice hockey during highschool and in middle school, I have always been asked who my favorite team is. I always struggled with the answer as in Wisconsin we do not have a team. Therefore my question is, which team should I choose? Mainly, how does a team’s history of success, recent championships, or playoff appearances affect the decision to support that team? I also want to decide after looking at these teams which of two areas should I attend?
How this will be Accomplished
To determine which ice hockey team to support, particularly considering Wisconsin’s lack of a local team, I plan to adopt a multifaceted approach. Initially, I will compile a list of all NHL and other hockey teams to gather comprehensive and up-to-date information. Then I will select from the top group which two teams I should look at the stadium. In theory, a good team will all have a passionate fan base.
To assess a team’s historical success, the decision-making process will involve establishing criteria, assigning weights to different metrics,r and ultimately my choice will be an informed and meaningful one, blending statistical insights with personal preferences to select a team that resonates both historically and experimentally.
── Attaching core tidyverse packages ──────────────────────── tidyverse 2.0.0 ──
✔ forcats 1.0.0 ✔ stringr 1.5.0
✔ ggplot2 3.4.4 ✔ tibble 3.2.1
✔ lubridate 1.9.3 ✔ tidyr 1.3.0
✔ purrr 1.0.2 [conflicted] Will prefer dplyr::filter over any other package.
[conflicted] Will prefer dplyr::lag over any other package.First by identifying the HTML source. This is the page for ice hockey all the NHL Teams & Other Hockey Teams. First, in the collumn below is a couple examples of what the stats we will be pulling from.
Rows: 110 Columns: 17
── Column specification ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Delimiter: ","
chr (2): Franchise, Lg
dbl (15): From, To, Yrs, GP, W, L, T, OL, PTS, PTS%, Yrs Plyf, Div, Conf, Ch...
ℹ Use `spec()` to retrieve the full column specification for this data.
ℹ Specify the column types or set `show_col_types = FALSE` to quiet this message.
Rows: 111 Columns: 17
── Column specification ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Delimiter: ","
chr (17): show_col_types = FALSE, X2, X3, X4, X5, X6, X7, X8, X9, X10, X11, ...
ℹ Use `spec()` to retrieve the full column specification for this data.
ℹ Specify the column types or set `show_col_types = FALSE` to quiet this message.# A tibble: 111 × 17
show_col_types = FALS…¹ X2 X3 X4 X5 X6 X7 X8 X9 X10
<chr> <chr> <chr> <chr> <chr> <chr> <chr> <chr> <chr> <chr>
1 Franchise Lg From To Yrs GP W L T OL
2 Anaheim Ducks NHL 1993 2024 30 2315 1058 943 107 207
3 Anaheim Ducks NHL 2006 2024 18 1363 677 516 <NA> 170
4 Mighty Ducks of Anaheim NHL 1993 2006 12 952 381 427 107 37
5 Arizona Coyotes NHL 1979 2024 44 3437 1408 1575 266 188
6 Arizona Coyotes NHL 2014 2024 10 739 287 369 <NA> 83
7 Phoenix Coyotes NHL 1996 2014 17 1360 615 546 94 105
8 Winnipeg Jets NHL 1979 1996 17 1338 506 660 172 <NA>
9 Boston Bruins NHL 1924 2024 99 6830 3381 2449 791 209
10 Buffalo Sabres NHL 1970 2024 53 4150 1896 1656 409 189
# ℹ 101 more rows
# ℹ abbreviated name: ¹`show_col_types = FALSE`
# ℹ 7 more variables: X11 <chr>, X12 <chr>, X13 <chr>, X14 <chr>, X15 <chr>,
# X16 <chr>, X17 <chr>Make sure when working on this proect that the working directory is set to a folder. The working directory is the folder on your computer where R will look for files and where it will save files if you don’t specify a path.
Set Working Directory: You use
setwd("path/to/your/directory")to set the working directory to a specific folder on your computer.Check Working Directory: You can use
getwd()to check the current working directory.
Visualizations:
Is the wins-to-losses ratio for each team a crucial visualization that can significantly contribute to making an informed decision?
Analyzing the wins-to-losses ratio for each ice hockey team provides valuable insights into their overall performance. This ratio is a fundamental metric reflecting a team’s success on the ice.
The wins-to-losses ratio serves as a benchmark for assessing a team’s competitiveness and consistency throughout a season or over multiple seasons. By examining this metric for various teams, one can identify those with a higher ratio, signifying stronger performance, while lower ratios may indicate areas for improvement or variability in success. Such an analysis enables fans, analysts, and team management to gauge and compare the relative strengths of different teams in the dynamic and competitive landscape of ice hockey.
In view of the graph, we are able to see that the reds which represent the NHL have a higher win to loss ratio than the WHA. This can be view as NHL has a higher wins than losses which lead to a stronger ratio, or that WHA does not play that many games comparison.
Does a correlation exist between the total number of points scored and the overall number of wins for teams?
In exploring the relationship between the number of points scored and the total wins for ice hockey teams, several key aspects warrant attention. Firstly, a detailed analysis of the data is essential to identify patterns and trends. Understanding whether an increase in points directly corresponds to a higher number of wins.
Additionally, examining outliers or instances where high point totals do not translate into significant win counts could unveil unique team dynamics or playing styles. The strength of any correlation being positive should be thoroughly assessed to gauge the predictive value of points in determining a team’s success.
Ultimately, focusing on these key elements will contribute to a nuanced and insightful interpretation of the connection between points scored and total wins, providing valuable insights for both enthusiasts and analysts in the realm of ice hockey.
Is there a discernible relationship between Stanley Cup wins and total wins specifically within the NHL context?
Analyzing the relationship between Stanley Cup wins and total wins within the NHL context reveals several key insights into the dynamics of success in professional ice hockey. The paramount aspect is the examination of whether teams that consistently secure higher total wins in the regular season also exhibit a propensity for clinching the prestigious Stanley Cup. Notably, such a correlation underscores the importance of teams maintaining competitiveness throughout the entire season to position themselves favorably for playoff contention.
Conversely, the absence of a strong correlation may suggest that factors beyond regular-season victories, such as playoff strategies, player performance under postseason pressure, or sheer unpredictability, play a more significant role in securing the ultimate championship. The analysis of this relationship provides valuable insights for fans, analysts, and team management, guiding expectations and strategies for sustained success in the challenging NHL landscape.
What is the relationship between wins_losses_ratio and Point percentage?
In delving into the correlation between Stanley Cup wins and total wins within the exclusive context of the NHL, several key focal points emerge. Identifying whether teams with higher total wins are more likely to secure coveted Stanley Cup victories sheds light on the significance of regular-season success. This curve backs this statement up as it demonstrate that the more wins the high the point percentage. Which is logicial.
The strength and consistency of this correlation merit close scrutiny, as it provides insights into the factors contributing to sustained excellence in the highly competitive NHL landscape.
How can the distribution of the number of times a team in the first position in the division be effectively visualized in relation to the years in which teams secured victories in the playoff conference championship?
In exploring the visual representation of the distribution of the number of times a team achieved first place in the division juxtaposed with the years of playoff conference championship victories, several key considerations come to the forefront.
Firstly, a detailed analysis of the data is crucial to unveil patterns in teams’ performances over different years. Understanding whether teams consistently securing the top position in the division also tend to excel in playoff conference championships is a primary focus. This analysis helps discern any correlation between regular-season dominance and postseason success.
Additionally, the visualization should highlight any anomalies or instances where a high number of divisional victories does not correspond with success in the playoff conference championship. In this graph, their are not outlines that would suggest this.
Found out the the NHL is just better than WHA. From there, it leads to personal decision if I would like to choose a team that has the highest win to lost ratio, the oldest team, or even the highest amount of Stanley Cup’s.
Conclusion
Choosing a hockey team to support involves a thoughtful consideration of various factors, each contributing to the unique identity and appeal of a franchise. A team’s history of success, recent championships, and playoff appearances play pivotal roles in shaping its allure for fans.
Recent championships reflect a team’s ability to navigate difference challenges. Playoff appearances, marked by intense battles and emotional highs, contribute to the team’s narrative, creating a sense of shared experience for fans. Ultimately, the decision to support a team can be decided as well with your own personal journey, blending statistical achievements with emotional resonance, and finding a team whose legacy and current performance align with individual preferences and values.