TEDD Baseline


Both groups: n = 19



AD: n = 8



DLB: n = 11






Counts vs. LSNS


Higher LSNS = more engagement



Counts vs. UCLA


Lower UCLA = less loneliness



Counts vs. MoCA


Higher MoCA = better cognition





Counts vs. UPDRS


Lower UPDRS = less disability




All correlations


Total sample


counts vs. LSNS (n = 19): -0.0801228 (-0.5155692, 0.3882146)
counts vs. MoCA (n = 20): -0.4079326 (-0.72040655, 0.04220743)
counts vs. UCLA (n = 20): -0.06605876 (-0.4941348, 0.3877983)
counts vs. UPDRS (n = 17): -0.5228769 (-0.80197171, -0.05640865)




AD group


counts vs. LSNS (n = 8): -0.7940216 (-0.9609939, -0.2028463)
counts vs. MoCA (n = 8): -0.06524825 (-0.7360773, 0.6702415)
counts vs. UCLA (n = 8): -0.3952423 (-0.8603058, 0.4288811)
counts vs. UPDRS (n = 6): 0.5490575 (-0.4734864, 0.9412179)



DLB group


counts vs. LSNS (n = 11): 0.07926497 (-0.5466004, 0.6483133)
counts vs. MoCA (n = 12): -0.4387128 (-0.8089409, 0.1806800)
counts vs. UCLA (n = 12): 0.006711211 (-0.5693834, 0.5783851)
counts vs. UPDRS (n = 11): -0.6074928 (-0.8848947, -0.0119855)