Week 12 Results of Norfolk in Chance 2023-24 Fantasy Hockey Season
Week 12 in Norfolk in Chance: A Remarkable Display of Strategy and Skill
The Unpredictable World of Fantasy Hockey
Week 12 in the Norfolk in Chance fantasy hockey league has come to a close, and it has been a whirlwind of strategic maneuvers, unexpected upsets, and standout performances. From the highs of “Hughes Your Daddy” topping the charts to the lows of “Hintz’s Holly Jolly Sitters” facing a challenging week, the league has been a spectacle of skill and strategy.
A Look at the Week’s Champions
“Hughes Your Daddy” emerged as the top team of the week, scoring an impressive RotoScore of 11.3. Their dominance in categories like goals, hits, and blocks showcased their well-rounded approach to the game. Meanwhile, “Killing Them Softly” made a significant comeback from last week’s slump, securing a notable second place with a RotoScore of 10.8.
Category Leaders - A Closer Look
Here is a table showcasing the leaders in each statistical category for Week 12 in the Norfolk in Chance fantasy hockey league based on the provided data:
| Team Name | Category | Value |
|---|---|---|
| Back2Back?/Mathletes | Goals (G) | 12 |
| Killing Them Softly | Assists (A) | 24 |
| Banger Catz | Plus/Minus (+/-) | 23 |
| Back2Back? | Penalty Minutes (PIM) | 38 |
| Ginga Ninja | Power Play Points (PPP) | 13 |
| Rock ’Em Sock ’Em Robots | Shots on Goal (SOG) | 107 |
| Back2Back? | Hits (HIT) | 62 |
| Broad Street Bullies’ | Blocks (BLK) | 51 |
| Multiple teams | Wins (W) | 3 |
| Hughes your Daddy | Goals Against (GA) | 3 |
| God Save the Quinn | Saves (SV) | 144 |
This table highlights the top-performing teams in each category, illustrating the diverse strategies and strengths within the league.
Highlights and Analysis
- Offensive Powerhouses: “Killing Them Softly”, “Mathletes” and “Back2Back?” showed remarkable offensive prowess, leading in goals and assists, respectively.
- Defensive Giants: “Broad Street Bullies’” made their mark with a staggering 51 blocks, demonstrating a solid defensive front.
- The Netminders’ Stand: Goalies from “Hughes Your Daddy” and “The Untouchables” faced a tough week, with “God Save the Quinn” leading in saves despite a challenging set of matchups.
- Penalty Minutes: “Back2Back?” led in penalty minutes, indicating a more aggressive style of play this week.
Concluding Thoughts
Week 12 has been a showcase of the strategic depth and unpredictability inherent in fantasy hockey. As we look ahead, the question on everyone’s mind is whether “Hughes Your Daddy” can maintain their top spot or if another team will rise to challenge their supremacy. The league continues to be a battleground of wit, skill, and a little bit of luck, keeping everyone on the edge of their seats. Stay tuned for more action as Norfolk in Chance heads into another exciting week!
| Team.Name | RotoScore | OpponentRotoScore |
|---|---|---|
| Hughes Your Daddy | 11.3 | 10.0 |
| Killing Them Softly | 10.8 | 8.5 |
| Banger Catz | 10.6 | 10.3 |
| Back2Back? | 10.6 | 8.3 |
| Rock ‘Em Sock ‘Em Robots | 10.3 | 10.6 |
| Ginga Ninja | 10.3 | 8.6 |
| God Save the Quinn | 10.1 | 6.4 |
| Peterpumpkineater69 | 10.0 | 11.3 |
| Broad Street Bullies’ | 9.1 | 7.5 |
| As Gudas It Gets! | 8.6 | 10.3 |
| Hungry for Apples? | 8.5 | 10.8 |
| Mathletes | 8.3 | 10.6 |
| Koala-ty Franchise | 8.2 | 8.1 |
| There are no goalies | 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Champagne Campaign | 7.5 | 9.1 |
| The Untouchables | 7.1 | 6.2 |
| TEE2GREEN | 6.4 | 10.1 |
| Hintz’s Holly Jolly Sitters | 6.2 | 7.1 |
| Team Name | G | A | +/- | PIM | PPP | SOG | HIT | BLK | W | GA | SV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| God Save the Quinn | 3 | 22 | 7 | 25 | 6 | 63 | 44 | 42 | 3 | 16 | 144 |
| TEE2GREEN | 6 | 9 | 0 | 15 | 4 | 67 | 31 | 42 | 2 | 12 | 109 |
| Banger Catz | 11 | 23 | 23 | 6 | 7 | 80 | 34 | 31 | 3 | 8 | 100 |
| Rock ‘Em Sock ‘Em Robots | 9 | 21 | 11 | 10 | 5 | 107 | 45 | 47 | 1 | 11 | 85 |
| Broad Street Bullies’ | 11 | 15 | -7 | 18 | 4 | 76 | 39 | 51 | 2 | 15 | 128 |
| Champagne Campaign | 8 | 12 | 9 | 6 | 3 | 69 | 27 | 45 | 3 | 5 | 78 |
| As Gudas It Gets! | 6 | 12 | -13 | 28 | 4 | 74 | 48 | 41 | 3 | 8 | 87 |
| Ginga Ninja | 5 | 17 | -14 | 21 | 13 | 92 | 47 | 38 | 3 | 7 | 78 |
| Killing Them Softly | 5 | 24 | 3 | 20 | 9 | 88 | 43 | 26 | 3 | 9 | 123 |
| Hungry for Apples? | 10 | 12 | -4 | 10 | 9 | 73 | 31 | 40 | 3 | 10 | 119 |
| Back2Back? | 12 | 10 | -1 | 38 | 4 | 68 | 62 | 44 | 3 | 8 | 89 |
| Mathletes | 12 | 11 | 7 | 16 | 11 | 71 | 39 | 22 | 1 | 21 | 124 |
| There are no goalies | 11 | 15 | -5 | 22 | 7 | 73 | 40 | 33 | 1 | 19 | 105 |
| Koala-ty Franchise | 7 | 15 | 5 | 35 | 3 | 80 | 48 | 29 | 0 | 16 | 95 |
| Peterpumpkineater69 | 9 | 21 | 14 | 14 | 10 | 77 | 40 | 28 | 2 | 12 | 111 |
| Hughes Your Daddy | 11 | 16 | 14 | 20 | 7 | 91 | 51 | 40 | 0 | 3 | 52 |
| Hintz’s Holly Jolly Sitters | 10 | 6 | -12 | 28 | 3 | 65 | 39 | 19 | 2 | 6 | 88 |
| The Untouchables | 5 | 20 | -3 | 14 | 6 | 76 | 18 | 30 | 2 | 19 | 138 |
Players of the Week
Top Performers of the Week
This section celebrates the top-performing players of the week. Each player listed below has shown exceptional performance and has been a key player for their respective fantasy teams.
| Name | Team | GP | G | A | PTS | PPP | SOG | +/- | PIM | Hits | Blocks | Team Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEBASTIAN AHO | CAR | 3 | 2 | 9 | 11 | 6 | 8 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | Ginga Ninja |
| ANDREI SVECHNIKOV | CAR | 3 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 4 | 8 | 4 | 2 | 9 | 0 | Mathletes |
| LEON DRAISAITL | EDM | 3 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 13 | 5 | 18 | 3 | 0 | Koala-ty Franchise |
| DAVID PASTRNAK | BOS | 3 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 3 | 13 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 1 | God Save the Quinn |
| JAKE DEBRUSK | BOS | 3 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 3 | Mathletes |
Worst Players of the Week
This section highlights the players who faced significant challenges this week. Each player listed below had a tough week on the ice and will be looking to bounce back in their upcoming matches. Their resilience and determination to improve will be crucial for their respective fantasy teams.
| Name | Team | GP | G | A | PTS | PPP | SOG | +/- | PIM | Hits | Blocks | Team Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KYLE PALMIERI | NYI | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | -4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | Hintz’s Holly Jolly Sitters |
| TEUVO TERAVAINEN | CAR | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | Champagne Campaign |
| KIRILL MARCHENKO | CBJ | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | TEE2GREEN |
| MARTIN NECAS | CAR | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | -1 | 2 | 3 | 0 | Back2Back? |
| CODY CECI | EDM | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | Banger Catz |
Season Roto Rankings According to CHATGPT
(Lowest score reflects the best): Based on the cumulative stats provided for each team, here are the rotisserie rankings for Week 12 in the Norfolk in Chance fantasy hockey league:
| Rank | Team Name | RotoScore |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | God Save the Quinn | 58.0 |
| 2 | Ginga Ninja | 71.5 |
| 3 | Rock ’Em Sock ’Em Robots | 78.0 |
| 4 | Broad Street Bullies’ | 86.5 |
| 5 | Hungry for Apples? | 90.0 |
| 6 | As Gudas It Gets! | 91.0 |
| 7 | Banger Catz | 103.0 |
| 8 | The Untouchables | 106.5 |
| 9 | Killing Them Softly | 109.0 |
| 10 | There are no goalies | 119.5 |
| 11 | Mathletes | 123.5 |
| 12 | TEE2GREEN | 127.0 |
| 13 | Champagne Campaign | 132.5 |
| 14 | Back2Back? | 134.5 |
| 15 | Peterpumpkineater69 | 142.5 |
| 16 | Koala-ty Franchise | 146.0 |
| 17 | Hughes Your Daddy | 155.0 |
| 18 | Hintz’s Holly Jolly Sitters | 178.0 |
These rankings reflect the overall performance of each team across various categories like goals, assists, plus/minus, penalty minutes, power play points, shots on goal, hits, blocks, wins, goals against, and saves. “God Save the Quinn” takes the top spot with the lowest RotoScore, indicating a balanced and effective performance across all categories.
In-Depth Analysis of Norfolk in Chance Fantasy Hockey League: Team Strengths and Weaknesses
1. God Save the Quinn
Strengths: “God Save the Quinn” showcases a stellar performance in multiple areas, particularly excelling in shots on goal (SOG) and saves (SV). Their strategic gameplay in these areas indicates a strong offensive push combined with reliable goaltending.
Weaknesses: Despite their top ranking, the team could improve in penalty minutes (PIM) and power play points (PPP), suggesting a need for more disciplined play and efficiency in special teams.
2. Ginga Ninja
Strengths: “Ginga Ninja” stands out for their power play points (PPP) and assists (A), highlighting their effectiveness in creating scoring opportunities and capitalizing on power plays.
Weaknesses: The team falls short in the goals against (GA) category, indicating a potential vulnerability in their defensive game that could be exploited by opponents.
3. Rock ’Em Sock ’Em Robots
Strengths: This team excels in assists and shots on goal, demonstrating strong offensive capabilities and a high volume of scoring chances.
Weaknesses: Their lower rank in wins (W) and goals against suggests a need for more consistent goaltending and defensive strategies.
4. Broad Street Bullies’
Strengths: Excelling in blocks (BLK) and hits (HIT), “Broad Street Bullies’” have a formidable physical presence on the ice, disrupting opponents’ offensive flow.
Weaknesses: Their challenge lies in plus/minus and wins, indicating room for improvement in overall team performance and goaltending.
5. Hungry for Apples?
Strengths: Leading in saves, this team boasts strong goaltending. Their high rank in penalty minutes also suggests an aggressive style of play.
Weaknesses: The team could bolster their power play effectiveness and reduce their goals against to climb higher in the standings.
6. As Gudas It Gets!
Strengths: With a high rank in hits, “As Gudas It Gets!” displays a physical, intimidating style of play, complemented by solid performance in shots on goal.
Weaknesses: They lag in the plus/minus category, indicating potential issues with overall team cohesion during even-strength play.
7. Banger Catz
Strengths: “Banger Catz” excels in plus/minus and wins, showing effective team play and reliable goaltending.
Weaknesses: Their lower performance in assists and shots on goal suggests a need for more offensive creativity and shooting.
8. The Untouchables
Strengths: This team is strong in power play points and goals, indicating efficiency in capitalizing on scoring opportunities.
Weaknesses: A lower rank in hits and blocks points to a less physical game, which could be a tactical choice but might also limit their ability to disrupt opponents.
9. Killing Them Softly
Strengths: Leading in goals and with a high rank in power play points, “Killing Them Softly” showcases a potent offensive lineup.
Weaknesses: Their challenges are in plus/minus and goals against, suggesting areas for improvement in team defense and goaltending.
10. There are no goalies
Strengths: This team’s strengths lie in their goal-scoring abilities and power play points, emphasizing their offensive prowess.
Weaknesses: A lack of wins and higher goals against indicate a need for stronger goaltending and defensive strategies.
11. Mathletes
Strengths: “Mathletes” perform well in power play points and saves, showcasing strong special teams play and goaltending.
Weaknesses: Their struggle in goals and assists points to a need for more offensive production.
12. TEE2GREEN
Strengths: Excelling in blocked shots, “TEE2GREEN” shows a strong defensive game, particularly in disrupting opponents’ shots.
Weaknesses: The team’s lower rank in goals and assists suggests a need for more offensive firepower.
13. Champagne Campaign
Strengths: “Champagne Campaign” does well in hits, indicating a physical style of play that can disrupt opponents.
Weaknesses: They could improve in goals and power play points to boost their offensive threat.
14. Back2Back?
Strengths: “Back2Back?” ranks highly in hits, showcasing a physically imposing game style.
Weaknesses: The team’s lower performance in goals and power play points indicates a need for more offensive production, especially on special teams.
15. Peterpumpkineater69
Strengths: With high power play points, “Peterpumpkineater69” demonstrates effectiveness in capitalizing on man-advantage situations.
Weaknesses: Their challenges lie in plus/minus and goals against, pointing to
areas of improvement in team defense and goaltending.
16. Koala-ty Franchise
Strengths: This team shows strength in assists, indicating good puck movement and playmaking abilities.
Weaknesses: A lower rank in wins and shots on goal suggests the need for more offensive aggression and consistent goaltending.
17. Hughes Your Daddy
Strengths: “Hughes Your Daddy” excels in hits, exhibiting a strong physical presence on the ice.
Weaknesses: They need improvement in goals and plus/minus, highlighting a need for more scoring and better team performance during even-strength play.
18. Hintz’s Holly Jolly Sitters
Strengths: The team performs well in saves, indicating strong goaltending.
Weaknesses: Their struggle in most offensive categories, particularly goals and assists, suggests a critical need for enhanced offensive strategies.
Each team in Norfolk in Chance demonstrates unique strengths and areas for growth, contributing to an exciting and unpredictable fantasy hockey league landscape.
Rotisserie Scores for the Season
The rotisserie scores reflect the cumulative performance of each team over the season. The higher the score, the better the team’s overall performance across various categories. Let’s take a closer look at the current season’s rotisserie scores for each team.
| Team Name | Total | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rock ‘Em Sock ‘Em Robots | 11.0 | 13.0 | 10.8 | 10.5 | 10.5 | 9.4 | 11.5 | 11.3 | 12.4 | 13.5 | 8.6 | 10.6 | 10.3 |
| Ginga Ninja | 10.9 | 11.0 | 9.8 | 10.6 | 12.0 | 11.4 | 10.8 | 12.0 | 11.6 | 9.7 | 12.9 | 8.6 | 10.3 |
| As Gudas It Gets! | 10.2 | 11.5 | 8.1 | 7.6 | 9.4 | 9.0 | 13.1 | 11.8 | 6.1 | 10.5 | 13.8 | 12.9 | 8.6 |
| Back2Back? | 10.0 | 7.9 | 9.1 | 12.6 | 10.1 | 9.1 | 8.4 | 9.3 | 9.5 | 11.2 | 10.4 | 11.9 | 10.6 |
| God Save the Quinn | 9.9 | 10.4 | 9.9 | 9.1 | 10.2 | 10.3 | 8.7 | 10.9 | 8.8 | 11.6 | 9.3 | 9.0 | 10.1 |
| Killing Them Softly | 9.5 | 10.1 | 9.4 | 11.5 | 12.5 | 11.8 | 6.4 | 8.0 | 10.0 | 7.3 | 9.2 | 6.6 | 10.8 |
| The Untouchables | 9.4 | 11.8 | 5.7 | 8.4 | 8.4 | 10.5 | 10.5 | 8.9 | 10.2 | 9.8 | 11.2 | 9.8 | 7.1 |
| Broad Street Bullies’ | 9.2 | 11.1 | 11.5 | 7.5 | 10.0 | 11.1 | 6.1 | 6.9 | 9.6 | 11.1 | 6.3 | 9.7 | 9.1 |
| Banger Catz | 9.1 | 8.5 | 6.9 | 8.4 | 10.8 | 8.1 | 11.3 | 8.3 | 10.6 | 6.5 | 9.0 | 10.3 | 10.6 |
| Hungry for Apples? | 8.9 | 7.5 | 12.8 | 12.6 | 6.5 | 8.8 | 9.3 | 6.8 | 8.5 | 9.1 | 9.3 | 7.5 | 8.5 |
| Hughes Your Daddy | 8.7 | 8.5 | 10.8 | 5.0 | 5.8 | 9.7 | 10.1 | 9.1 | 9.7 | 8.4 | 7.5 | 8.4 | 11.3 |
| Peterpumpkineater69 | 8.3 | 7.1 | 6.6 | 9.6 | 7.4 | 5.6 | 7.5 | 11.4 | 11.4 | 7.6 | 7.0 | 8.1 | 10.0 |
| Hintz’s Holly Jolly Sitters | 8.2 | 5.8 | 6.8 | 10.8 | 8.5 | 9.4 | 10.9 | 6.5 | 7.5 | 8.3 | 9.4 | 7.9 | 6.2 |
| Champagne Campaign | 8.0 | 10.1 | 8.8 | 6.8 | 7.6 | 9.1 | 10.0 | 6.9 | 7.6 | 9.4 | 5.6 | 7.0 | 7.5 |
| TEE2GREEN | 7.9 | 7.5 | 9.0 | 8.4 | 7.7 | 7.6 | 6.9 | 7.8 | 5.8 | 8.3 | 9.9 | 9.2 | 6.4 |
| Koala-ty Franchise | 7.7 | 6.2 | 7.5 | 11.5 | 11.2 | 5.0 | 8.5 | 9.0 | 6.2 | 6.0 | 5.9 | 7.4 | 8.2 |
| There are no goalies | 7.2 | 4.9 | 7.7 | 4.7 | 4.5 | 9.4 | 7.9 | 7.5 | 6.2 | 9.1 | 9.1 | 7.6 | 8.1 |
| Mathletes | 7.2 | 6.0 | 8.6 | 5.6 | 7.5 | 6.3 | 5.5 | 8.9 | 8.4 | 5.4 | 8.3 | 7.6 | 8.3 |
| Team Name | Total | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| As Gudas It Gets! | 9.8 | 10.1 | 9.9 | 10.5 | 10.8 | 7.6 | 9.3 | 9.3 | 9.7 | 11.1 | 11.2 | 7.6 | 10.3 |
| There are no goalies | 9.8 | 10.4 | 10.8 | 8.4 | 7.7 | 8.8 | 8.4 | 9.1 | 9.6 | 9.8 | 12.9 | 12.9 | 8.2 |
| Peterpumpkineater69 | 9.7 | 5.8 | 8.8 | 10.6 | 7.5 | 11.8 | 8.7 | 11.3 | 10.6 | 8.3 | 9.3 | 11.9 | 11.3 |
| Rock ‘Em Sock ‘Em Robots | 9.4 | 11.8 | 7.7 | 7.6 | 11.2 | 9.4 | 10.0 | 11.4 | 8.4 | 7.3 | 9.3 | 8.6 | 10.6 |
| Hughes Your Daddy | 9.4 | 7.5 | 12.8 | 12.6 | 12.0 | 11.1 | 10.5 | 7.5 | 6.1 | 6.0 | 9.4 | 7.0 | 10.0 |
| Hintz’s Holly Jolly Sitters | 9.2 | 7.1 | 8.6 | 11.5 | 10.2 | 9.4 | 11.3 | 7.8 | 8.5 | 11.2 | 7.5 | 9.7 | 7.1 |
| Killing Them Softly | 9.1 | 11.5 | 7.5 | 10.8 | 7.6 | 5.6 | 5.5 | 12.0 | 8.8 | 13.5 | 9.0 | 9.2 | 8.5 |
| The Untouchables | 9.1 | 13.0 | 6.9 | 8.4 | 6.5 | 9.1 | 10.1 | 6.9 | 11.6 | 9.1 | 13.8 | 7.4 | 6.2 |
| Champagne Campaign | 9.1 | 11.0 | 6.6 | 5.6 | 12.5 | 10.3 | 11.5 | 8.3 | 5.8 | 9.1 | 10.4 | 8.4 | 9.1 |
| Hungry for Apples? | 9.0 | 7.9 | 10.8 | 7.5 | 8.4 | 9.4 | 13.1 | 9.0 | 7.5 | 9.4 | 7.0 | 7.6 | 10.8 |
| Broad Street Bullies’ | 9.0 | 8.5 | 9.0 | 12.6 | 10.1 | 9.7 | 10.8 | 8.9 | 6.2 | 10.5 | 5.9 | 7.9 | 7.5 |
| Ginga Ninja | 8.8 | 10.1 | 9.1 | 9.6 | 5.8 | 6.3 | 6.1 | 8.0 | 10.2 | 11.6 | 9.1 | 10.6 | 8.6 |
| God Save the Quinn | 8.6 | 4.9 | 8.1 | 11.5 | 8.5 | 9.1 | 7.5 | 8.9 | 10.0 | 9.7 | 8.6 | 10.3 | 6.4 |
| Mathletes | 8.6 | 6.2 | 6.8 | 6.8 | 7.4 | 11.4 | 6.4 | 10.9 | 12.4 | 6.5 | 9.9 | 7.5 | 10.6 |
| Back2Back? | 8.2 | 7.5 | 9.8 | 5.0 | 10.0 | 10.5 | 7.9 | 11.8 | 6.2 | 8.3 | 5.6 | 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Banger Catz | 8.2 | 11.1 | 5.7 | 4.7 | 9.4 | 5.0 | 10.9 | 6.9 | 11.4 | 5.4 | 9.2 | 9.0 | 10.3 |
| Koala-ty Franchise | 8.2 | 6.0 | 9.4 | 9.1 | 10.5 | 8.1 | 6.9 | 6.8 | 9.5 | 8.4 | 6.3 | 9.8 | 8.1 |
| TEE2GREEN | 8.1 | 8.5 | 11.5 | 8.4 | 4.5 | 9.0 | 8.5 | 6.5 | 7.6 | 7.6 | 8.3 | 6.6 | 10.1 |
This report was last run: 2024-01-01 10:12:08