STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM

This study aims to assess the organizational development on process re-engineering of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR), Regional Office No. VII: Specifically, this study wants to attempt to answer the following:

1. Demographic profile of the respondents as process owners of process re-engineering in organizational development in DENR Region 7.

##         Level
## Sex      1st Level 2nd Level Sum
##   FEMALE        11         4  15
##   MALE           5         4   9
##   Sum           16         8  24
##                  Level
## Age               1st Level 2nd Level Sum
##   22-30 YEARS OLD         8         3  11
##   31-40 YEARS OLD         5         5  10
##   41-50 YEARS OLD         2         0   2
##   51-60 YEARS OLD         1         0   1
##   Sum                    16         8  24
##          Level
## Status    1st Level 2nd Level Sum
##   MARRIED         6         2   8
##   SINGLE          9         6  15
##   WIDOWED         1         0   1
##   Sum            16         8  24
##                               Level
## Position                       1st Level 2nd Level Sum
##   ACCOUNTANT 1                         0         1   1
##   ADMIN. ASSISTANT II                  1         0   1
##   ADMINISTRATIVE AIDE                  7         0   7
##   ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT 1           2         0   2
##   ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER 1             0         1   1
##   CARTOGRAPHER I                       2         0   2
##   CASUAL                               0         1   1
##   CLERK                                1         0   1
##   DMO 1                                0         1   1
##   ECOMS I                              0         2   2
##   ENCODER                              1         0   1
##   FORESTER 1                           0         1   1
##   MATHEMATICIAN AIDE 1                 1         0   1
##   PROJECT EVALUATION ASSISTANT         1         0   1
##   PROJECT SUPPORT STAFF                0         1   1
##   Sum                                 16         8  24
##                    Level
## Service             1st Level 2nd Level Sum
##   11-15 YEARS               1         2   3
##   5-10 YEARS               11         5  16
##   LESS THAN 5 YEARS         4         1   5
##   Sum                      16         8  24
##                    Level
## Training            1st Level 2nd Level Sum
##   1-20 HOURS                8         2  10
##   21-40 HOURS               3         1   4
##   41-60 HOURS               1         0   1
##   61-80 HOURS               1         1   2
##   81 HOURS AND MORE         3         4   7
##   Sum                      16         8  24
##                                Level
## Education                       1st Level 2nd Level Sum
##   COLLEGE GRADUATE                     14         8  22
##   MASTER'S DEGREE GRADUATE              1         0   1
##   WITH UNITS IN MASTER'S DEGREE         1         0   1
##   Sum                                  16         8  24

2. Level of assessment of the respondents in terms of:

2.1 deployment and dissemination of vision;

##         Mean Median Standard Deviation
## 1.1     4.21    4.0               0.59
## 1.2     4.25    4.0               0.68
## 1.3     4.08    4.0               0.58
## 1.4     4.58    5.0               0.50
## 1.5     4.33    4.0               0.64
## Average 4.29    4.2               0.60

2.2 leadership;

##         Mean Median Standard Deviation
## 2.1     4.08      4               0.65
## 2.2     4.29      4               0.69
## 2.3     4.38      4               0.58
## 2.4     4.04      4               0.86
## 2.5     3.92      4               0.88
## Average 4.14      4               0.73

2.3 inter-coordination and cross-functional activities;

##         Mean Median Standard Deviation
## 3.1     4.25    4.0               0.61
## 3.2     4.38    4.5               0.71
## 3.3     4.50    5.0               0.78
## 3.4     4.25    4.0               0.74
## 3.5     4.17    4.0               0.70
## Average 4.31    4.3               0.71

2.4 involvement of employees as process owners;

##         Mean Median Standard Deviation
## 4.1     4.38    4.0               0.49
## 4.2     4.25    4.0               0.61
## 4.3     4.08    4.0               0.65
## 4.4     4.42    4.5               0.65
## 4.5     4.29    4.0               0.62
## Average 4.28    4.1               0.60

2.5 provisions of facilities and equipment;

##         Mean Median Standard Deviation
## 5.1     4.38      4               0.58
## 5.2     4.08      4               0.88
## 5.3     4.08      4               0.78
## 5.4     4.17      4               0.76
## 5.5     4.17      4               0.70
## Average 4.18      4               0.74

2.6 professional development;

##         Mean Median Standard Deviation
## 6.1     4.25      4               0.68
## 6.2     4.25      4               0.74
## 6.3     3.88      4               0.80
## 6.4     4.08      4               0.78
## 6.5     3.96      4               0.69
## Average 4.08      4               0.74

2.7 rewards and recognition; and

##         Mean Median Standard Deviation
## 7.1     4.21      4               0.78
## 7.2     3.96      4               0.86
## 7.3     4.21      4               0.88
## 7.4     4.17      4               0.87
## 7.5     4.21      4               0.72
## Average 4.15      4               0.82

2.8 provisions of online services

##            Mean Median Standard Deviation
## 8.1        4.04   4.00               0.86
## 8.2        4.00   4.00               0.78
## 8.3        4.12   4.00               0.80
## 8.4        4.17   4.00               0.82
## 8.5        3.83   4.00               0.64
## Average    4.03   4.00               0.78
## Total Avg. 4.18   4.08               0.72

3. Are there any significant differences in responses on the level of process re-engineering practices of the two groups of respondents?

## 
##  Welch Two Sample t-test
## 
## data:  q1 by Level
## t = -0.066375, df = 11.449, p-value = 0.9482
## alternative hypothesis: true difference in means is not equal to 0
## 95 percent confidence interval:
##  -0.425024  0.400024
## sample estimates:
## mean in group 1 mean in group 2 
##          4.2875          4.3000
## 
##  Welch Two Sample t-test
## 
## data:  q2 by Level
## t = 0.26925, df = 18.986, p-value = 0.7906
## alternative hypothesis: true difference in means is not equal to 0
## 95 percent confidence interval:
##  -0.4233685  0.5483685
## sample estimates:
## mean in group 1 mean in group 2 
##          4.1625          4.1000
## 
##  Welch Two Sample t-test
## 
## data:  q3 by Level
## t = 0.41893, df = 11.16, p-value = 0.6832
## alternative hypothesis: true difference in means is not equal to 0
## 95 percent confidence interval:
##  -0.5305802  0.7805802
## sample estimates:
## mean in group 1 mean in group 2 
##           4.350           4.225
## 
##  Welch Two Sample t-test
## 
## data:  q4 by Level
## t = -1.9454, df = 18.757, p-value = 0.06688
## alternative hypothesis: true difference in means is not equal to 0
## 95 percent confidence interval:
##  -0.67497733  0.02497733
## sample estimates:
## mean in group 1 mean in group 2 
##           4.175           4.500
## 
##  Welch Two Sample t-test
## 
## data:  q5 by Level
## t = -0.44627, df = 15.378, p-value = 0.6616
## alternative hypothesis: true difference in means is not equal to 0
## 95 percent confidence interval:
##  -0.6486669  0.4236669
## sample estimates:
## mean in group 1 mean in group 2 
##          4.1375          4.2500
## 
##  Welch Two Sample t-test
## 
## data:  q6 by Level
## t = 0.23319, df = 20.857, p-value = 0.8179
## alternative hypothesis: true difference in means is not equal to 0
## 95 percent confidence interval:
##  -0.3960988  0.4960988
## sample estimates:
## mean in group 1 mean in group 2 
##            4.10            4.05
## 
##  Welch Two Sample t-test
## 
## data:  q7 by Level
## t = -1.953, df = 20.202, p-value = 0.06481
## alternative hypothesis: true difference in means is not equal to 0
## 95 percent confidence interval:
##  -1.00784358  0.03284358
## sample estimates:
## mean in group 1 mean in group 2 
##          3.9875          4.4750
## 
##  Welch Two Sample t-test
## 
## data:  q8 by Level
## t = -2.8849, df = 21.024, p-value = 0.008855
## alternative hypothesis: true difference in means is not equal to 0
## 95 percent confidence interval:
##  -1.0755036 -0.1744964
## sample estimates:
## mean in group 1 mean in group 2 
##           3.825           4.450
##      Item p-value 
## [1,] "Q1" "0.9482"
## [2,] "Q2" "0.7906"
## [3,] "Q3" "0.6832"
## [4,] "Q4" "0.0669"
## [5,] "Q5" "0.6616"
## [6,] "Q6" "0.8179"
## [7,] "Q7" "0.0648"
## [8,] "Q8" "0.0089"