Principles of environmental science and engineering (Engr233 / NSci323) teaches the fundamental physical, biological, and chemical principles of environmental processes. The course applies mathematics and science to environmental problems with a focus on the provision of safe drinking water and the proper treatment of wastewater. Additionally, the course discusses the application of major Federal environmental laws in the regulation of pollutants. This course is co-listed with NSci 323. The course meets the following program outcomes
AA PreEngineering Demonstrate the basic principles of environmental engineering including water chemistry, water and wastewater treatment, and the mass balance approach to system analysis.
BS Earth Science Demonstrate a fundamental understanding of biology, ecology, mathematics and physics.
BS Conservation Biology Quantitatively express natural phenomena and relationships.
Course learning outcomes for Engr233 / NSci323 are as follows:
SLO1: Use modern scientific software in environmental analysis, design, and communication of results.
SLO2: Differentiate contexts in which major Federal environmental laws and Tribal ordinances apply in the regulation of pollutants and contaminants to protect human and environmental health.
SLO3: Implement a systems approach to environmental problems through the application of mass balance and chemical equilibria principles.
SLO4: Demonstrate the concept of risk in relation to environmental standards.
SLO5: Describe municipal and rural water and wastewater treatment processes.
Successfully knitting this Rmd file, updating the author name, and providing neat professional output is worth up to 10-points.
Please refer to the EPA National Primary Drinking Water Standards website, your lesson sheets, and the Tri-county/Mni Waste’ Rural Water System Consumer Confidence Report to answer the following questions.
The difference between a Primary and secondary standards is that the primary standards are used to limit the contaminants and make the drinking water safe. It is put into place for the health of the people, while secondary standards put into place to make the drinking water look ascetically pleasing or make the drinking water taste better.
Maximum Contaminant levels is measurement that allows for drinking water to be potable. Maximum Contaminant level Goals is a measure ment that EPA and everyone wants to aim for in an ideal world.
Three classes of contaminant are Inorganic chemical, Organic chemicals and Disinfection Byproducts.
Copper is regulated as a Treatment Technology, its potential long term exposure is liver or kidney damage, and the potential contaminant source is corrosion of household plumbing systems and erosion of natural deposits. Hexachlorocyclopentadiene is regulated as an MCL, the potential health risks for contaminant are kidney or stomach problems, and the potential contaminant source is discharge from chemical factories. Chlorite is an MCL, health risks are anemia, and nervous system effects in infants and young children, and source of contaminant is a byproduct of drinking water disinfection.
Arsenic and Total trihalomethanes both exceed the MCLG, but I do not see any contaminants that exceed the MCL.
Please answer the following questions about the pH, electroneutrality, and characteristics of four regional groundwaters by running the code below and referring to the laboratory reports provided to answer the following questions. Reach out to me if you are having trouble with the code
(4-points) What is the hydrogen ion concentration for the PRR municipal water lab report pH?
(4-points) Would addition of a small amount of strong acid affect the pH of PRR municipal water based on the alkalinity reported in the lab report? Why or why not?
It may because it is considered a mixed type that is almost a strong acid according to the Piper diagram.
Electroneutrality is when the amount of anions and cations are the same. The electroneutrality for Madison, Minnelusa, and Mni Wiconi southern PRR is about neutral, but the Cherry Creek electroneutrality’s standard devation is -3.95.
Mni Wiconi is a mixed type that is a sodium and potassium cation and a bicarbonate type anion. Cherry Creek Artesion is a sodium chloride type, sodium and potassium cation, and bicarbonate anion. Minnelusa is a magnesium bicarbonate type, calcium type cation, and a bicarbonate type anion. Madison is a magnesium bicarbonate type, calcium type cation, and a bicarbonate type anion.
Madison, Minnelusa, and Mni wiconi are all considered good. Madison is very close to being considered excellent and Mni Wiconi is close to being considered fair. The Cherry Creek artesian is 5526 and is unacceptable. It exceeds a TDS of 1200.
Madison and Minnelusa have a temporary hardness and treamtent can be used to soften the water. Mni Wiconi is a mixed type, but treatment can still used to soften the water. Cherry Creek has permanent hardness and will be too expensive to soften.
Reverse Osmosis reduces cations in water and reduces 98% of incoming minerals from the water. The disadvantage is that the equipment is more expensive, and the cost per a gallon is higher about 3- 4 gallons of water are thrown away to make a gallon of RO. Using zeolite is a another way to soften water, but afterwards it has no real use.
Please answer the following questions about risk using your lesson plans, text, and notes.
There are several ethical considerations that are involved with setting enviromental standards, because the persception of what people may say. Policy-makers and politicians should use factual data to support necessary standards rather than using one’s own perceptive.
Policy-makers can use factual data that goes along with the assessed risk and use wording that makes the perception of risk less daunting because the perception of risk is as real as the scientific perspective of risk in a public health context.
There is no amount of money that can reduce all risk, but there are ways to reduce the risk of exposure.
1.)Hazard dentifcation 2.) Dose-response assessment 3.) exposure assessment 4.) risk characterization
Risk assessment is the likelyhood of harm that is caused by exposure or the dose taken in by a person. Risk management is what to do about the exposure. The challenge of risk management is making decisions under extreme uncertainty about how to allocate national resources to protect public health and environment.
Please answer the following questions about drinking water assessment and treatment using your lesson plans, text, and notes
Data for the Rapid City drinking water is estimated from the USGS report “Water-quality characteristics in the Black Hills area, South Dakota” https://pubs.usgs.gov/wri/wri014194/ – abstract https://pubs.usgs.gov/wri/wri014194/pdf/wri014194.pdf – direct download link
Other data are from laboratory reports for a deep groundwater at Cherry Creek, SD and a municipal drinking water from the Mni Wiconi project. The Mni Wiconi water is a blend of treated surface water from the Missouri River and groundwater from the Arikaree Formation.
Added in the F, Br, I, and nitrate ions but still had missing anions
Found adding Si as an anion for USGS data substantially improved electroneutrality see: https://snowpure.com/docs/resintech-silica-iwc99.pdf
The code chunk 05_below calculates the equilibrium concentration of carbonate as a function of hydrogen ion concentration – the pH of the water. This is described in detail on pages 67 and 68 of the text.
For nearly neutral water (pH between 6 and 8.5), the concentrations of \(CO_3^(2-)\) and \(OH^{-}\) ions are very small. In this same pH range, the bicarbonate/carbonate equilibrium strongly favors bicarbonate. The alkalinity is approximately equal to \((HCO_3)\)
In the equation below, bicarbonate dissociates to release a hydrogen ion and a carbonate ion
\[ \mathrm{HCO}_3^{-} \rightleftarrows \mathrm{H}^{+}+\mathrm{CO}_3^{2-} \]
The equilibrium between bicarbonate and carbonate is written as: \[ \frac{\left[\mathrm{H}^{+}\right]\left[\mathrm{CO}_3^{2-}\right]}{\left[\mathrm{HCO}_3^{-}\right]}=K_2=4.68 \times 10^{-11} \mathrm{~mol} / \mathrm{L} \]
where \(K_2\) is constant describing the second dissociation of carbonic acid
\[H_2CO_3 \rightleftarrows CO_{2}\mathrm{(aq)} + H_2O\]
This is the equation to transform concentration as an equivalent as CaCO3 \[ \mathrm{mg} / \mathrm{L} \text { of } \mathrm{X} \text { as } \mathrm{CaCO}_3=\frac{\text { concentration of } \mathrm{X}(\mathrm{mg} / \mathrm{L}) \times 50.0 \mathrm{mg} \mathrm{CaCO} / \mathrm{meq}}{\mathrm{EW} \text { of } \mathrm{X}(\mathrm{mg} / \mathrm{meq})} \]
The total hardness (TH) is the sum of individual hardness components \[ \text { Total Hardness (TH) }=\mathrm{Ca}^{2+}+\mathrm{Mg}^{2+} \]
Total hardness can be separated into two components: carbonate hardness (CH), which associated with \((CO_3)\) and \((HCO_3)\), and noncarbonate hardness (NCH) associated with other anions.
If the concentration of \((CO_3)\) and \((HCO_3)\) equals or exceeds the total hardness (if alkalinity exceeds TH), then CH = TH
If alkalinity is less than TH, then CH = alkalinity and NCH = TH - CH