Bike commute mode share
2013-2017 2018-2022 Change (%pt.) Change (absolute)
Losers
Santa Barbara, California 4.4% 3.0% −1.4% −32%
Minneapolis, Minnesota 4.1% 2.6% −1.5% −37%
Eugene, Oregon 6.5% 5.0% −1.5% −23%
Gainesville, Florida 4.8% 3.3% −1.5% −31%
Bloomington, Indiana 3.7% 2.1% −1.6% −43%
Missoula, Montana 6.4% 4.8% −1.6% −25%
Ames, Iowa 3.4% 1.7% −1.7% −50%
Ann Arbor, Michigan 4.4% 2.6% −1.8% −41%
Fort Collins, Colorado 6.4% 4.5% −1.9% −30%
Boulder, Colorado 10.4% 8.2% −2.2% −21%
Portland, Oregon 6.5% 4.1% −2.4% −37%
Chico, California 5.1% 2.2% −2.9% −57%
Berkeley, California 8.0% 4.9% −3.1% −39%
Santa Cruz, California 9.2% 5.0% −4.2% −46%
Davis, California 19.7% 13.5% −6.2% −31%
Winners
South San Francisco, California 0.3% 1.0% +0.7% +233%
Wyoming, Michigan 0.1% 0.6% +0.5% +500%
North Charleston, South Carolina 0.3% 0.8% +0.5% +167%
Broomfield, Colorado 0.3% 0.8% +0.5% +167%
Midland, Texas 0.0% 0.4% +0.4% +Inf%
Gaithersburg, Maryland 0.2% 0.6% +0.4% +200%
Westminster, Colorado 0.2% 0.6% +0.4% +200%
West Hartford CDP, Connecticut 0.1% 0.4% +0.3% +300%
Sterling Heights, Michigan 0.1% 0.4% +0.3% +300%
New York, New York 1.2% 1.5% +0.3% +25%
Toledo, Ohio 0.2% 0.5% +0.3% +150%
Jersey City, New Jersey 0.4% 0.7% +0.3% +75%
Thornton, Colorado 0.1% 0.3% +0.2% +200%
Plano, Texas 0.1% 0.3% +0.2% +200%
North Las Vegas, Nevada 0.1% 0.3% +0.2% +200%
Data: American Community Survey 5-year estimates, Table S0801