Week 8 Results of Norfolk in Chance 2023-24 Fantasy Hockey Season
Fantasy Hockey Week 8 Highlights: Norfolk in Chance League
Week 8 of the Norfolk in Chance fantasy hockey league saw some remarkable performances, with teams vying for dominance across various statistical categories. The week was highlighted by top-tier showings from teams like Rock ’Em Sock ’Em Robots, Ginga Ninja, and Peterpumpkineater69, while others struggled to keep up.
Top Performers Steal the Show
Rock ’Em Sock ’Em Robots, with a RotoScore of 12.4, led the pack this week. Their dominance in goals (G), assists (A), and power play points (PPP) was particularly impressive, thanks to their strategic player picks and lineup decisions. Their standout performance was mirrored by their actual stats, including a league-leading 12 goals and 28 assists.
Ginga Ninja followed closely with an 11.6 RotoScore, showing strength in saves (SV) and hits (HIT), a testament to their robust defensive strategy and strong goaltending. Their actual stats mirrored this with 201 saves, a testament to their goalie’s stellar performance.
Peterpumpkineater69, not far behind with an 11.4 RotoScore, showed a balanced team effort. Their positive contributions across categories, especially in goals and assists, highlighted their well-rounded team structure.
Teams Facing Challenges
At the other end of the spectrum, teams like There are no goalies and TEE2GREEN struggled to make their mark, with RotoScores of 6.2 and 5.8, respectively. The Washington Capitals, despite having superstar Alex Ovechkin, found themselves at the bottom, indicating that star power alone isn’t enough in the complex world of fantasy hockey.
Highlighting Category Leaders
The week’s results bring into focus the importance of strategic diversity in fantasy hockey. Here’s a table showcasing the team leaders in each category:
| Category | Team Leader | Value |
|---|---|---|
| Goals (G) | Hughes your Daddy | 13 |
| Assists (A) | Rock ’Em Sock ’Em Robots | 28 |
| Plus/Minus (+/-) | There are no goalies | 14 |
| Penalty Minutes (PIM) | Hungry for Apples | 38 |
| Power Play Points (PPP) | The Untouchables | 15 |
| Shots on Goal (SOG) | The Untouchables | 138 |
| Hits (HIT) | Hughes Your Daddy | 68 |
| Blocks (BLK) | The Untouchables | 64 |
| Wins (W) | Banger Catz and others | 4 |
| Goals Against (GA) | Hughes Your Daddy/Back2Back | 7 |
| Saves (SV) | Banger Catz | 210 |
Concluding Thoughts
As the Norfolk in Chance league progresses, it’s evident that success in fantasy hockey requires a blend of strategic acumen, player knowledge, and a touch of luck. The varying performances across teams serve as a reminder of the unpredictability and excitement inherent in fantasy sports. With the season still unfolding, it remains to be seen who will rise and who will fall in the weeks to come.
| Team.Name | RotoScore | OpponentRotoScore |
|---|---|---|
| Rock ‘Em Sock ‘Em Robots | 12.4 | 8.4 |
| Ginga Ninja | 11.6 | 10.2 |
| Peterpumpkineater69 | 11.4 | 10.6 |
| Banger Catz | 10.6 | 11.4 |
| The Untouchables | 10.2 | 11.6 |
| Killing Them Softly | 10.0 | 8.8 |
| Hughes Your Daddy | 9.7 | 6.1 |
| Broad Street Bullies’ | 9.6 | 6.2 |
| Back2Back? | 9.5 | 6.2 |
| God Save the Quinn | 8.8 | 10.0 |
| Hungry for Apples? | 8.5 | 7.5 |
| Mathletes | 8.4 | 12.4 |
| Champagne Campaign | 7.6 | 5.8 |
| The Mighty Ducks | 7.5 | 8.5 |
| There are no goalies | 6.2 | 9.6 |
| Koala-ty Franchise | 6.2 | 9.5 |
| As Gudas It Gets! | 6.1 | 9.7 |
| TEE2GREEN | 5.8 | 7.6 |
| Team Name | G | A | +/- | PIM | PPP | SOG | HIT | BLK | W | GA | SV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| God Save the Quinn | 11 | 13 | -5 | 33 | 8 | 103 | 44 | 29 | 3 | 18 | 178 |
| Killing Them Softly | 8 | 15 | 2 | 20 | 8 | 83 | 52 | 54 | 3 | 13 | 133 |
| Banger Catz | 6 | 14 | 6 | 35 | 7 | 89 | 47 | 39 | 4 | 15 | 210 |
| Peterpumpkineater69 | 12 | 20 | -2 | 18 | 9 | 100 | 50 | 41 | 2 | 13 | 173 |
| Broad Street Bullies’ | 12 | 13 | 9 | 33 | 6 | 85 | 50 | 63 | 1 | 9 | 91 |
| There are no goalies | 11 | 14 | 14 | 12 | 7 | 82 | 34 | 31 | 1 | 20 | 133 |
| Champagne Campaign | 7 | 15 | 1 | 32 | 3 | 75 | 36 | 36 | 4 | 9 | 132 |
| TEE2GREEN | 8 | 13 | 2 | 6 | 6 | 92 | 22 | 34 | 3 | 18 | 160 |
| As Gudas It Gets! | 7 | 15 | -14 | 14 | 6 | 124 | 42 | 25 | 1 | 15 | 144 |
| Hughes Your Daddy | 13 | 15 | 0 | 14 | 8 | 106 | 68 | 36 | 1 | 7 | 85 |
| Back2Back? | 6 | 21 | 13 | 28 | 6 | 88 | 41 | 53 | 3 | 7 | 88 |
| Koala-ty Franchise | 10 | 9 | -6 | 24 | 6 | 93 | 37 | 37 | 1 | 9 | 82 |
| Hungry for Apples? | 7 | 9 | 0 | 38 | 4 | 78 | 46 | 46 | 4 | 15 | 172 |
| The Mighty Ducks | 3 | 23 | -8 | 12 | 9 | 98 | 29 | 37 | 3 | 14 | 120 |
| Rock ‘Em Sock ‘Em Robots | 12 | 28 | 12 | 32 | 12 | 112 | 45 | 43 | 1 | 10 | 110 |
| Mathletes | 7 | 17 | 1 | 16 | 8 | 95 | 40 | 35 | 3 | 19 | 185 |
| Ginga Ninja | 9 | 16 | 2 | 22 | 9 | 103 | 64 | 51 | 3 | 23 | 201 |
| The Untouchables | 6 | 21 | -21 | 12 | 15 | 138 | 46 | 64 | 3 | 8 | 88 |
Ranking NHL Teams by Fantasy Performance
Fantasy Hockey Analysis: Team Gamescore Per Game Reveals Surprises and Shortcomings in NHL
In the realm of fantasy hockey, the calculation of Gamescore per Game (GSpG) by NHL team has yielded intriguing insights into team performances, with some unexpected leaders and laggards. This metric compares the average performance throughout the fantasy year and calculates a players impact relative to the average.
The latest standings place the Ottawa Senators at the pinnacle, largely due to the stellar performance of star player Brady Tkachuk. However, this is just the tip of the iceberg in a league brimming with talent and competition.
Ottawa Senators Lead the Charge
The Senators, with a GSpG of 0.32, owe much of their fantasy success to Brady Tkachuk. His dynamic play and consistent scoring have been pivotal in propelling Ottawa to the top of the fantasy rankings. Tkachuk’s impact on the ice is a prime example of how a single player’s excellence can elevate an entire team’s fantasy stature.
Top Contenders and Key Players
Not far behind are the Edmonton Oilers and Toronto Maple Leafs, both tied with a GSpG of 0.21. Edmonton’s performance is buoyed by the likes of Connor McDavid and Leon Draisaitl, whose offensive prowess is well-known throughout the league. Toronto’s standing, similarly, can be credited to the exceptional play of Auston Matthews and Mitchell Marner, who have been instrumental in their team’s success.
The New Jersey Devils and Tampa Bay Lightning follow closely, each with a GSpG of 0.20. The Devils have seen significant contributions from players like Jack Hughes, while the Lightning continue to rely on the scoring touch of Brayden Point and Nikita Kucherov.
Teams with Notable Performances
Other teams like the Vancouver Canucks (0.19 GSpG) and Vegas Golden Knights (0.15 GSpG) have also made their mark. Vancouver’s Quinn Hughes and Elias Pettersson have been key, while Vegas owes much to the performances of players like Mark Stone.
The Struggling Giants
Contrastingly, the Washington Capitals find themselves languishing at the bottom with a GSpG of -0.67. This comes as a surprise given the presence of superstar Alex Ovechkin in their lineup. It highlights that even the most formidable players can face challenges in elevating their team’s fantasy performance. Washington’s overall team struggles are a stark reminder that fantasy hockey success hinges on collective team effort as much as individual brilliance.
Concluding Thoughts
As the fantasy season progresses, the importance of team synergy, along with individual heroics, becomes increasingly evident. While the Ottawa Senators currently lead the pack, the dynamic nature of hockey means no team’s position is secure. The ongoing tussle for fantasy dominance will continue to be a testament to the unpredictable and thrilling nature of the sport.
| Team | GSpG |
|---|---|
| OTT | 0.32 |
| EDM | 0.21 |
| TOR | 0.21 |
| N.J | 0.20 |
| T.B | 0.20 |
| VAN | 0.19 |
| VGK | 0.15 |
| DET | 0.13 |
| NYR | 0.11 |
| BOS | 0.09 |
| NSH | 0.05 |
| COL | 0.03 |
| FLA | 0.02 |
| MIN | 0.02 |
| ANA | -0.02 |
| L.A | -0.02 |
| ARI | -0.06 |
| NYI | -0.06 |
| PHI | -0.13 |
| WPG | -0.15 |
| MTL | -0.18 |
| CAR | -0.28 |
| DAL | -0.28 |
| CGY | -0.33 |
| SEA | -0.33 |
| CBJ | -0.37 |
| S.J | -0.47 |
| PIT | -0.51 |
| BUF | -0.52 |
| STL | -0.62 |
| CHI | -0.64 |
| WSH | -0.67 |
Players of the Week
Top Performers of the Week
This section celebrates the top-performing players of the week. Each player listed below has shown exceptional performance and has been a key player for their respective fantasy teams.
| Name | Team | GP | G | A | PTS | PPP | SOG | +/- | PIM | Hits | Blocks | Team Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JACK HUGHES | N.J | 3 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 2 | 24 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | Hughes Your Daddy |
| BRAD MARCHAND | BOS | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 21 | -2 | 9 | 3 | 3 | God Save the Quinn |
| TOM WILSON | WSH | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 16 | -2 | 6 | 9 | 3 | Koala-ty Franchise |
| CHARLIE MCAVOY | BOS | 4 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 9 | -2 | 4 | 3 | 13 | Killing Them Softly |
| VINCENT TROCHECK | NYR | 4 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 1 | 19 | 3 | 6 | 8 | 2 | Peterpumpkineater69 |
The week in fantasy hockey saw some remarkable performances. Let’s dive into individual highlights of the top players, each bringing unique contributions to their respective teams.
Worst Players of the Week
This section highlights the players who faced significant challenges this week. Each player listed below had a tough week on the ice and will be looking to bounce back in their upcoming matches. Their resilience and determination to improve will be crucial for their respective fantasy teams.
| Name | Team | GP | G | A | PTS | PPP | SOG | +/- | PIM | Hits | Blocks | Team Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JONATHAN DROUIN | COL | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | Broad Street Bullies’ |
| LUKE EVANGELISTA | NSH | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | -1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | Killing Them Softly |
| CALEN ADDISON | S.J | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | Koala-ty Franchise |
| SHAYNE GOSTISBEHERE | DET | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | -2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | Peterpumpkineater69 |
| DANTE FABBRO | NSH | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 4 | 1 | 5 | Champagne Campaign |
Predicting the Bottom of the league
In the dynamic world of fantasy hockey, where strategy and chance collide, let’s take a closer look at the bottom four teams in the Norfolk in Chance league after eight weeks. With a blend of optimism and misfortune, these teams provide a humorous insight into the world of fantasy sports. Let’s explore their rosters and team dynamics, sprinkling in a bit of light-hearted commentary on their journey in this unpredictable arena.
Peterpumpkineater69 - Rank 15 - Team Motto: “Halloween was months ago, but our performance is still spooky bad.” - Roast: Despite having talented players like Johnny Gaudreau and Jason Robertson, Peterpumpkineater69 seems to be jinxed, perhaps by the ghost of Halloween past. Even with Adam Fox’s defensive prowess, the team’s strategy resembles a haunted house-full of surprises but not many treats.
Mathletes - Rank 16 - Team Motto: “We calculated the odds of winning… and promptly ignored them.” - Roast: With a roster boasting Jonathan Huberdeau and Ryan O’Reilly, the Mathletes should be acing the numbers game. Yet, they seem to be playing fantasy hockey like it’s a Sudoku puzzle they can’t quite solve. Perhaps John Gibson in goal can bring some much-needed order to this numerical chaos.
Hughes Your Daddy - Rank 17 - Team Motto: “Our players may not score, but our puns do.” - Roast: With Artemi Panarin and Joe Pavelski, one would think scoring wouldn’t be an issue. But Hughes Your Daddy seems to be playing more for the puns than the points. Maybe Carter Hart’s goaltending can help turn their witty quips into wins, but for now, they’re more likely to score laughs than goals.
There are no goalies - Rank 18 - Team Motto: “Who needs goalies when you can have moral victories?” - Roast: Ironically named, this team actually has Andrei Vasilevskiy, one of the best in the business. However, with Brock Nelson and Nathan MacKinnon leading the charge, one wonders if their strategy is to distract opponents with offense while quietly hoping nobody notices their defensive gaps. A bold move, indeed.
Predicting Who Will Finish Last: Choosing who might secure the last place in this whimsical race is tricky, as each team combines a unique mix of talent and misfortune. “There are no goalies” takes the lead with a strategy that seems to defy conventional wisdom, despite having strong players like Vasilevskiy and MacKinnon. They’re the underdogs in a race where being the top dog isn’t necessarily the goal.
In the end, fantasy hockey isn’t just about winning; it’s about the shared experiences, the jokes, and the enduring spirit of sportsmanship. May the most humorously hapless team win!
Rotisserie Scores for the Season
The rotisserie scores reflect the cumulative performance of each team over the season. The higher the score, the better the team’s overall performance across various categories. Let’s take a closer look at the current season’s rotisserie scores for each team.
| Team Name | Total | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rock ‘Em Sock ‘Em Robots | 11.2 | 13.0 | 10.8 | 10.5 | 10.5 | 9.4 | 11.5 | 11.3 | 12.4 |
| Ginga Ninja | 11.2 | 11.0 | 9.8 | 10.6 | 12.0 | 11.4 | 10.8 | 12.0 | 11.6 |
| Killing Them Softly | 10.0 | 10.1 | 9.4 | 11.5 | 12.5 | 11.8 | 6.4 | 8.0 | 10.0 |
| God Save the Quinn | 9.8 | 10.4 | 9.9 | 9.1 | 10.2 | 10.3 | 8.7 | 10.9 | 8.8 |
| As Gudas It Gets! | 9.6 | 11.5 | 8.1 | 7.6 | 9.4 | 9.0 | 13.1 | 11.8 | 6.1 |
| Back2Back? | 9.5 | 7.9 | 9.1 | 12.6 | 10.1 | 9.1 | 8.4 | 9.3 | 9.5 |
| The Untouchables | 9.3 | 11.8 | 5.7 | 8.4 | 8.4 | 10.5 | 10.5 | 8.9 | 10.2 |
| Broad Street Bullies’ | 9.2 | 11.1 | 11.5 | 7.5 | 10.0 | 11.1 | 6.1 | 6.9 | 9.6 |
| Banger Catz | 9.1 | 8.5 | 6.9 | 8.4 | 10.8 | 8.1 | 11.3 | 8.3 | 10.6 |
| Hungry for Apples? | 9.1 | 7.5 | 12.8 | 12.6 | 6.5 | 8.8 | 9.3 | 6.8 | 8.5 |
| Hughes Your Daddy | 8.6 | 8.5 | 10.8 | 5.0 | 5.8 | 9.7 | 10.1 | 9.1 | 9.7 |
| Champagne Campaign | 8.4 | 10.1 | 8.8 | 6.8 | 7.6 | 9.1 | 10.0 | 6.9 | 7.6 |
| Peterpumpkineater69 | 8.3 | 7.1 | 6.6 | 9.6 | 7.4 | 5.6 | 7.5 | 11.4 | 11.4 |
| The Mighty Ducks | 8.3 | 5.8 | 6.8 | 10.8 | 8.5 | 9.4 | 10.9 | 6.5 | 7.5 |
| Koala-ty Franchise | 8.1 | 6.2 | 7.5 | 11.5 | 11.2 | 5.0 | 8.5 | 9.0 | 6.2 |
| TEE2GREEN | 7.6 | 7.5 | 9.0 | 8.4 | 7.7 | 7.6 | 6.9 | 7.8 | 5.8 |
| Mathletes | 7.1 | 6.0 | 8.6 | 5.6 | 7.5 | 6.3 | 5.5 | 8.9 | 8.4 |
| There are no goalies | 6.6 | 4.9 | 7.7 | 4.7 | 4.5 | 9.4 | 7.9 | 7.5 | 6.2 |
| Team Name | Total | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hughes Your Daddy | 10.0 | 7.5 | 12.8 | 12.6 | 12.0 | 11.1 | 10.5 | 7.5 | 6.1 |
| Rock ‘Em Sock ‘Em Robots | 9.7 | 11.8 | 7.7 | 7.6 | 11.2 | 9.4 | 10.0 | 11.4 | 8.4 |
| As Gudas It Gets! | 9.7 | 10.1 | 9.9 | 10.5 | 10.8 | 7.6 | 9.3 | 9.3 | 9.7 |
| Broad Street Bullies’ | 9.5 | 8.5 | 9.0 | 12.6 | 10.1 | 9.7 | 10.8 | 8.9 | 6.2 |
| Peterpumpkineater69 | 9.4 | 5.8 | 8.8 | 10.6 | 7.5 | 11.8 | 8.7 | 11.3 | 10.6 |
| The Mighty Ducks | 9.3 | 7.1 | 8.6 | 11.5 | 10.2 | 9.4 | 11.3 | 7.8 | 8.5 |
| Hungry for Apples? | 9.2 | 7.9 | 10.8 | 7.5 | 8.4 | 9.4 | 13.1 | 9.0 | 7.5 |
| There are no goalies | 9.2 | 10.4 | 10.8 | 8.4 | 7.7 | 8.8 | 8.4 | 9.1 | 9.6 |
| The Untouchables | 9.1 | 13.0 | 6.9 | 8.4 | 6.5 | 9.1 | 10.1 | 6.9 | 11.6 |
| Champagne Campaign | 8.9 | 11.0 | 6.6 | 5.6 | 12.5 | 10.3 | 11.5 | 8.3 | 5.8 |
| Killing Them Softly | 8.7 | 11.5 | 7.5 | 10.8 | 7.6 | 5.6 | 5.5 | 12.0 | 8.8 |
| Back2Back? | 8.6 | 7.5 | 9.8 | 5.0 | 10.0 | 10.5 | 7.9 | 11.8 | 6.2 |
| God Save the Quinn | 8.6 | 4.9 | 8.1 | 11.5 | 8.5 | 9.1 | 7.5 | 8.9 | 10.0 |
| Mathletes | 8.5 | 6.2 | 6.8 | 6.8 | 7.4 | 11.4 | 6.4 | 10.9 | 12.4 |
| Koala-ty Franchise | 8.3 | 6.0 | 9.4 | 9.1 | 10.5 | 8.1 | 6.9 | 6.8 | 9.5 |
| Ginga Ninja | 8.2 | 10.1 | 9.1 | 9.6 | 5.8 | 6.3 | 6.1 | 8.0 | 10.2 |
| Banger Catz | 8.1 | 11.1 | 5.7 | 4.7 | 9.4 | 5.0 | 10.9 | 6.9 | 11.4 |
| TEE2GREEN | 8.1 | 8.5 | 11.5 | 8.4 | 4.5 | 9.0 | 8.5 | 6.5 | 7.6 |
This report was last run: 2023-12-04 10:07:16