“Killing Them Softly” stood out with a superior RotoScore of 11.8. Their strategic dominance was highlighted by leading in Plus/Minus (+/-) with +18 and securing 5 Wins, showcasing a well-rounded approach to both offense and defense.
Category | Team Name | Value |
---|---|---|
G | There are no goalies | 19 |
A | Ginga Ninja | 31 |
+/- | Killing Them Softly | +18 |
PIM | Champagne Campaign | 52 |
PPP | Broad Street Bullies’ | 20 |
SOG | The Untouchables | 125 |
HIT | Back2Back? | 69 |
BLK | Rock ’Em Sock ’Em Robots | 57 |
W | Killing Them Softly | 5 |
GA | There are no goalies | 7 |
SV | Hughes Your Daddy | 186 |
These leaders demonstrate varied strategies in the league, with some teams excelling in offense while others shine in defense. The success of “There are no goalies” in both scoring and goaltending is particularly noteworthy, posing a formidable challenge to other teams.
As the season progresses, monitoring how teams adapt their strategies to address their weaknesses while leveraging their strengths will be intriguing. The dynamic nature of fantasy hockey means no lead is safe, and the competition is always evolving.
Team.Name | RotoScore | OpponentRotoScore |
---|---|---|
Killing Them Softly | 11.8 | 5.6 |
Ginga Ninja | 11.4 | 6.3 |
Broad Street Bullies’ | 11.1 | 9.7 |
The Untouchables | 10.5 | 9.1 |
God Save the Quinn | 10.3 | 9.1 |
Hughes Your Daddy | 9.7 | 11.1 |
There are no goalies | 9.4 | 8.8 |
Rock ‘Em Sock ‘Em Robots | 9.4 | 9.4 |
The Mighty Ducks | 9.4 | 9.4 |
Champagne Campaign | 9.1 | 10.3 |
Back2Back? | 9.1 | 10.5 |
As Gudas It Gets! | 9.0 | 7.6 |
Hungry for Apples? | 8.8 | 9.4 |
Banger Catz | 8.1 | 5.0 |
TEE2GREEN | 7.6 | 9.0 |
Mathletes | 6.3 | 11.4 |
Peterpumpkineater69 | 5.6 | 11.8 |
Koala-ty Franchise | 5.0 | 8.1 |
Team Name | G | A | +/- | PIM | PPP | SOG | HIT | BLK | W | GA | SV |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
God Save the Quinn | 8 | 30 | 3 | 14 | 17 | 92 | 41 | 45 | 3 | 13 | 159 |
Champagne Campaign | 12 | 16 | 11 | 52 | 9 | 83 | 31 | 33 | 3 | 22 | 166 |
Banger Catz | 11 | 15 | -2 | 43 | 6 | 91 | 39 | 43 | 2 | 8 | 105 |
Koala-ty Franchise | 5 | 17 | -2 | 22 | 4 | 78 | 44 | 26 | 0 | 15 | 75 |
Broad Street Bullies’ | 8 | 28 | -2 | 39 | 20 | 95 | 41 | 45 | 3 | 8 | 106 |
Hughes Your Daddy | 9 | 21 | -2 | 28 | 4 | 91 | 52 | 51 | 3 | 18 | 186 |
As Gudas It Gets! | 13 | 17 | 5 | 10 | 8 | 95 | 38 | 55 | 2 | 19 | 110 |
TEE2GREEN | 8 | 17 | -9 | 19 | 9 | 90 | 58 | 48 | 2 | 22 | 136 |
Killing Them Softly | 12 | 25 | 18 | 16 | 12 | 94 | 53 | 44 | 5 | 21 | 140 |
Peterpumpkineater69 | 11 | 12 | -10 | 28 | 6 | 73 | 34 | 43 | 1 | 11 | 93 |
Back2Back? | 9 | 14 | -22 | 20 | 9 | 96 | 69 | 51 | 3 | 13 | 83 |
The Untouchables | 18 | 20 | 3 | 24 | 11 | 125 | 34 | 48 | 1 | 11 | 66 |
There are no goalies | 19 | 30 | 15 | 18 | 8 | 100 | 30 | 18 | 1 | 7 | 78 |
Hungry for Apples? | 10 | 23 | 0 | 16 | 10 | 93 | 36 | 39 | 3 | 19 | 158 |
Rock ‘Em Sock ‘Em Robots | 17 | 14 | 1 | 10 | 6 | 111 | 31 | 57 | 3 | 13 | 150 |
The Mighty Ducks | 11 | 15 | 0 | 15 | 8 | 98 | 59 | 48 | 2 | 8 | 84 |
Mathletes | 7 | 12 | -17 | 35 | 8 | 62 | 44 | 21 | 2 | 19 | 192 |
Ginga Ninja | 17 | 31 | 15 | 20 | 12 | 110 | 37 | 47 | 1 | 11 | 79 |
This section celebrates the top-performing players of the week. Each player listed below has shown exceptional performance and has been a key player for their respective fantasy teams.
Name | Team | GP | G | A | PTS | PPP | SOG | +/- | PIM | Hits | Blocks | Team Name |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KYLE CONNOR | WPG | 3 | 5 | 3 | 8 | 3 | 16 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | The Untouchables |
NIKITA KUCHEROV | T.B | 3 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 3 | 15 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | As Gudas It Gets! |
CLAYTON KELLER | ARI | 3 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 7 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 | The Mighty Ducks |
BRAD MARCHAND | BOS | 3 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 12 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 5 | God Save the Quinn |
J.T. MILLER | VAN | 4 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 4 | 9 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 3 | Ginga Ninja |
Kyle Connor dazzled this week for “The Untouchables,” netting 5 goals in just 3 games. His total of 8 points, bolstered by 3 power play points (PPP), demonstrated his critical role in Winnipeg’s offense. Connor’s sharpshooting was on full display with 16 shots on goal, though his physical game stats like hits and blocks remained at zero, underscoring his focus on offensive production.
Kucherov continued to show why he’s a fantasy powerhouse for “As Gudas It Gets!” with 7 points in 3 games. His balanced contribution of 4 goals and 3 assists, along with 3 PPP and 15 shots on goal, showcased his all-around game. Despite a modest plus/minus rating, Kucherov’s ability to contribute in multiple categories makes him a consistent fantasy asset.
Keller had an impressive week for “The Mighty Ducks,” notching 6 points. His playmaking shined with 4 assists, and he also added 2 goals. Keller led the pack with 5 PPP, although his shot count was lower at 7. His impact wasn’t felt in the physical stats but his offensive contribution was crucial.
“God Save the Quinn” benefited from Marchand’s all-around play. He amassed 5 points, including 2 goals and 3 assists. Marchand’s contribution extended to 3 PPP and 12 shots on goal. His physical play was also notable with 4 PIM and 5 hits, adding a gritty edge to his fantasy value.
J.T. Miller was a key player for “Ginga Ninja,” contributing 7 points over 4 games. His balanced offensive output included 3 goals and 4 assists, along with 4 PPP. Miller’s 9 shots on goal were complemented by a solid physical game, recording 5 hits and 3 blocks, showcasing his value as a multi-category contributor in fantasy leagues.
This section highlights the players who faced significant challenges this week. Each player listed below had a tough week on the ice and will be looking to bounce back in their upcoming matches. Their resilience and determination to improve will be crucial for their respective fantasy teams.
Name | Team | GP | G | A | PTS | PPP | SOG | +/- | PIM | Hits | Blocks | Team Name |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JOHNNY GAUDREAU | CBJ | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5 | -4 | 2 | 0 | 3 | Peterpumpkineater69 |
SETH JARVIS | CAR | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | -1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | Champagne Campaign |
JONATHAN HUBERDEAU | CGY | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | -1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | Mathletes |
JANI HAKANPAA | DAL | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | Koala-ty Franchise |
ARTHUR KALIYEV | L.A | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | -2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | Peterpumpkineater69 |
Gaudreau had a challenging week with only 1 point in 4 games. His single assist and -4 in plus/minus reflected a tough stretch, and with just 5 shots on goal and no power play points, his usual offensive spark was missing.
Jarvis struggled to make an impact, recording no points in 3 games. His 3 shots on goal and -1 rating further indicated a slow week, contributing minimally to the physical game with just a few hits and a block.
Huberdeau, typically a high scorer, found himself in a slump, tallying just 1 assist in 3 games. His 3 shots on goal and -1 plus/minus rating were below expectations for a player of his caliber.
Hakanpaa had a quiet week offensively with no points in 4 games. While he showed a bit of physical presence with 4 penalty minutes and 4 hits, his contribution was overshadowed by his lack of scoring.
Kaliyev also struggled, notching zero points in 3 games. His 4 shots on goal and -2 plus/minus rating didn’t help his team, and although he contributed in hits and blocks, it wasn’t enough to offset his lack of scoring.
Rank | Team Name | Offense Grade | Defense Grade | Goaltending Grade |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Killing Them Softly | A | A | A |
2 | God Save the Quinn | A- | A | A |
3 | Broad Street Bullies’ | A | B+ | A- |
4 | Ginga Ninja | A- | A- | B+ |
5 | As Gudas It Gets! | B+ | B | B |
6 | Hungry for Apples? | B | B- | A+ |
7 | Rock ’Em Sock ’Em Robots | B | A- | A- |
8 | Champagne Campaign | B | B | B |
9 | Banger Catz | B- | C+ | A |
10 | Hughes Your Daddy | C+ | B | B- |
11 | Back2Back? | C | B- | B |
12 | The Untouchables | B- | C | B- |
13 | TEE2GREEN | C | C | B |
14 | Koala-ty Franchise | C- | C | C+ |
15 | The Mighty Ducks | C- | C- | C |
16 | Peterpumpkineater69 | C- | D+ | C- |
17 | Mathletes | D | D | A- |
18 | There are no goalies | B- | F | D |
Killing Them Softly: A well-rounded team excelling in all categories, particularly in defense and goaltending.
God Save the Quinn: Strong in offense and defense, with a particularly robust goaltending performance.
Broad Street Bullies’: Excellent offensive output complemented by good defense and goaltending.
Ginga Ninja: Balanced in all areas with slightly better offense, showing room for improvement in goaltending.
As Gudas It Gets!: Solid overall, but with room for improvement in defense.
Hungry for Apples?: Outstanding in goaltending but needs to bolster their defense.
Rock ’Em Sock ’Em Robots: Strong defensive capabilities but could improve on offense.
Champagne Campaign: A balanced team but lacking the edge in offense to rank higher.
Banger Catz: Good goaltending but needs significant improvements in defense.
Hughes Your Daddy: An average team with potential for improvement in goaltending.
Back2Back?: Needs to enhance their offensive game to climb the rankings.
The Untouchables: Moderate performance in all categories, with defense being the weakest link.
TEE2GREEN: An average team with consistent performance across all areas.
Koala-ty Franchise: Struggling in offense, with a decent defense and goaltending.
The Mighty Ducks: A team that needs improvement in both offense and defense.
Peterpumpkineater69: Weak offense and defense, with slightly better goaltending.
Mathletes: Despite strong goaltending, they fall short in both offense and defense.
There are no goalies: Decent in offense but severely lacking in defense and goaltending.
This analysis reflects the teams’ performances over the first five weeks of the season, indicating areas where each can improve to enhance their standing in the league.
1. The Sean Kuraly Conundrum: Starting Sean Kuraly is akin to choosing a tricycle for a Formula 1 race. Sure, it’s a unique choice, but it’s not going to get you to the finish line first. Kuraly’s occasional flashes of brilliance are drowned out by long stretches of fantasy irrelevance, making this decision a head-scratcher.
2. The Injury Reserve Love Story: It seems Mike’s team has a better relationship with the injury list than the score sheet. With players spending more time on IR than on the ice, the team resembles a M.A.S.H. unit more than a fantasy powerhouse. This frequent flyer status at the fantasy hockey hospital is a recipe for disaster.
3. The Elias Lindholm Illusion: Banking on Elias Lindholm to carry the team is like expecting a single life raft to save the Titanic. Yes, he’s a talented player, but he’s not the fantasy Messiah Mike needs him to be. Lindholm’s minus rating is a glaring chink in his armor, turning him from a fantasy stud to a liability.
4. The Goaltending Gamble: Thatcher Demko might be a bright spot, but relying on him as the backbone of your goaltending is like using a sieve to bail out water. Without a solid backup, Mike’s net-minding strategy is as leaky as a sieve, threatening to sink his team’s chances.
5. The J.T. Miller Mirage: Counting on J.T. Miller to maintain his stellar form is like expecting a shooting star to stick around for a selfie. While Miller’s off to a great start, banking on his consistency is a gamble. His high starting percentage is a testament to his current form, but in the volatile world of fantasy hockey, today’s hero can quickly become tomorrow’s zero.
6. The Matt Duchene Dilemma: Matt Duchene’s fluctuating form is as unpredictable as Mike’s golf swings - brilliant one moment, baffling the next. His move to Dallas might spark some magic, but depending on him for consistent fantasy points is a high-risk, low-reward strategy.
7. The Historical Rollercoaster: Mike’s past league performances are a wild ride of highs and lows. This inconsistency doesn’t bode well for maintaining a top spot. His history suggests that he’s more likely to zigzag through the rankings than cruise to victory.
8. The Random Draft Strategy: Mike’s drafting technique seems to be less about strategic analysis and more about a game of ‘eeny, meeny, miny, moe’. This haphazard approach is about as effective as trying to score a goal blindfolded.
9. The Overconfidence Trap: Mike’s mistaken belief that engineering acumen translates to fantasy hockey prowess is like believing you can fly a plane because you can drive a car. This overconfidence could lead to complacency, which in the fantasy sports world, is often the first step towards downfall.
10. The Artemi Panarin Paradox: While Artemi Panarin is a fantastic player, expecting him to single-handedly carry the team is wishful thinking. Like expecting a single firework to light up the entire night sky, relying too heavily on Panarin is a strategy fraught with peril.
In summary, while ‘Ginga Ninja’ sits atop the leaderboard for now, a combination of questionable decisions, overreliance on a few key players, and historical inconsistency make it a shaky throne. Mike might need more than just good luck to stay at the top!
As the NHL season progresses, the unexpected downturn in Connor McDavid’s performance continues to baffle fans and analysts alike. Once projected as the number one ranked player, McDavid now finds himself at an astonishing 77th place among skaters. This decline is starkly highlighted by his recent stats: just one point in his last five games, averaging below a point per game for the first time since his rookie season.
The Edmonton Oilers made a significant move, replacing head coach Jay Woodcroft with Kris Knoblauch. Such changes can have a profound impact on a team’s dynamics and individual performances. McDavid, known for his exceptional skill and leadership, might face challenges adapting to the new coaching strategies and systems.
McDavid’s scoring stats are a far cry from expectations. Projected to average 0.7 goals and 1.1 assists per game, his actual numbers are significantly lower, with 0.2 goals and 0.7 assists per game. This drop in productivity is a concern for the Oilers, given his high ice time and pivotal role in the team’s offense.
An intriguing aspect of McDavid’s struggle is his linemates’ low shooting percentage when he’s on the ice, which stands at a mere 5% against a league average of 9%. This could suggest issues with the team’s offensive chemistry or perhaps a need for tactical changes. McDavid’s personal shooting percentage is 6.7%, another figure that falls short of expectations.
The big question is: What comes next for Connor McDavid and the Oilers? As they navigate through this period of transition and adaptation, several factors will be crucial. The team must find a way to improve its shooting efficiency and adapt to the new coaching style. For McDavid, regaining his confidence and finding synergy with his linemates will be key.
In the world of professional sports, a player’s journey often involves overcoming hurdles. For a player of McDavid’s caliber, this is just another challenge to surmount. With his talent and resilience, it’s only a matter of time before he finds his way back to the top.
The rotisserie scores reflect the cumulative performance of each team over the season. The higher the score, the better the team’s overall performance across various categories. Let’s take a closer look at the current season’s rotisserie scores for each team.
Team Name | Total | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Killing Them Softly | 11.1 | 10.1 | 9.4 | 11.5 | 12.5 | 11.8 |
Ginga Ninja | 11.0 | 11.0 | 9.8 | 10.6 | 12.0 | 11.4 |
Rock ‘Em Sock ‘Em Robots | 10.8 | 13.0 | 10.8 | 10.5 | 10.5 | 9.4 |
Broad Street Bullies’ | 10.2 | 11.1 | 11.5 | 7.5 | 10.0 | 11.1 |
God Save the Quinn | 10.0 | 10.4 | 9.9 | 9.1 | 10.2 | 10.3 |
Back2Back? | 9.8 | 7.9 | 9.1 | 12.6 | 10.1 | 9.1 |
Hungry for Apples? | 9.6 | 7.5 | 12.8 | 12.6 | 6.5 | 8.8 |
As Gudas It Gets! | 9.1 | 11.5 | 8.1 | 7.6 | 9.4 | 9.0 |
The Untouchables | 9.0 | 11.8 | 5.7 | 8.4 | 8.4 | 10.5 |
Banger Catz | 8.5 | 8.5 | 6.9 | 8.4 | 10.8 | 8.1 |
Champagne Campaign | 8.5 | 10.1 | 8.8 | 6.8 | 7.6 | 9.1 |
Koala-ty Franchise | 8.3 | 6.2 | 7.5 | 11.5 | 11.2 | 5.0 |
The Mighty Ducks | 8.3 | 5.8 | 6.8 | 10.8 | 8.5 | 9.4 |
TEE2GREEN | 8.0 | 7.5 | 9.0 | 8.4 | 7.7 | 7.6 |
Hughes Your Daddy | 8.0 | 8.5 | 10.8 | 5.0 | 5.8 | 9.7 |
Peterpumpkineater69 | 7.3 | 7.1 | 6.6 | 9.6 | 7.4 | 5.6 |
Mathletes | 6.8 | 6.0 | 8.6 | 5.6 | 7.5 | 6.3 |
There are no goalies | 6.2 | 4.9 | 7.7 | 4.7 | 4.5 | 9.4 |
Team Name | Total | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hughes Your Daddy | 11.2 | 7.5 | 12.8 | 12.6 | 12.0 | 11.1 |
Broad Street Bullies’ | 10.0 | 8.5 | 9.0 | 12.6 | 10.1 | 9.7 |
As Gudas It Gets! | 9.8 | 10.1 | 9.9 | 10.5 | 10.8 | 7.6 |
Rock ‘Em Sock ‘Em Robots | 9.5 | 11.8 | 7.7 | 7.6 | 11.2 | 9.4 |
The Mighty Ducks | 9.4 | 7.1 | 8.6 | 11.5 | 10.2 | 9.4 |
There are no goalies | 9.2 | 10.4 | 10.8 | 8.4 | 7.7 | 8.8 |
Champagne Campaign | 9.2 | 11.0 | 6.6 | 5.6 | 12.5 | 10.3 |
Peterpumpkineater69 | 8.9 | 5.8 | 8.8 | 10.6 | 7.5 | 11.8 |
Hungry for Apples? | 8.8 | 7.9 | 10.8 | 7.5 | 8.4 | 9.4 |
The Untouchables | 8.8 | 13.0 | 6.9 | 8.4 | 6.5 | 9.1 |
Koala-ty Franchise | 8.6 | 6.0 | 9.4 | 9.1 | 10.5 | 8.1 |
Killing Them Softly | 8.6 | 11.5 | 7.5 | 10.8 | 7.6 | 5.6 |
Back2Back? | 8.6 | 7.5 | 9.8 | 5.0 | 10.0 | 10.5 |
God Save the Quinn | 8.4 | 4.9 | 8.1 | 11.5 | 8.5 | 9.1 |
TEE2GREEN | 8.4 | 8.5 | 11.5 | 8.4 | 4.5 | 9.0 |
Ginga Ninja | 8.2 | 10.1 | 9.1 | 9.6 | 5.8 | 6.3 |
Mathletes | 7.7 | 6.2 | 6.8 | 6.8 | 7.4 | 11.4 |
Banger Catz | 7.2 | 11.1 | 5.7 | 4.7 | 9.4 | 5.0 |
This report was last run: 2023-11-13 09:14:45