Page 1
Column 1
Chart Gender of Training Participants
Chart Gender and Organisational Affiliation of Training Participants
| Characteristic | Communication training for CSCs, N = 61 | Diversity and Inclusion of CSCs, N = 141 | Somcas, N = 111 | Valuation, N = 151 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | ||||
| Man | 6 (100%) | 10 (71%) | 10 (91%) | 9 (60%) |
| Woman | 0 (0%) | 4 (29%) | 1 (9.1%) | 6 (40%) |
| Government Organisation | ||||
| Civil Service Commission | 6 (100%) | 10 (71%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
| Ministry of Education (HSS) | 0 (0%) | 1 (7.1%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
| Ministry of Finance | 0 (0%) | 1 (7.1%) | 11 (100%) | 15 (100%) |
| Ministry of Humanitarian Relief | 0 (0%) | 1 (7.1%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
| Ministry of Women | 0 (0%) | 1 (7.1%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
| Premis Component | ||||
| CSC | 0 (0%) | 14 (100%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
| CSC-Com | 6 (100%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
| DRM | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 11 (100%) | 15 (100%) |
| 1 n (%) | ||||
Column 2
Chart Organisational Affiliation of Training Participants
Page 2
Column 3
Chart Usefulness of Training
Column 4
Chart Quality of Training
Page 3
Column 5
Chart Breakdown of Usefulness of Training
| Characteristic | Communication training for CSCs, N = 61 | Diversity and Inclusion of CSCs, N = 141 | Somcas, N = 111 | Valuation, N = 151 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Knowledge Improved |
|
|
|
|
| Agree | 2 (33%) | 0 (0%) | 6 (55%) | 4 (27%) |
| Strongly Agree | 4 (67%) | 14 (100%) | 5 (45%) | 11 (73%) |
| New Skills Learnt |
|
|
|
|
| Agree | 0 (0%) | 1 (7.1%) | 4 (36%) | 5 (33%) |
| Neutral | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (6.7%) |
| Strongly Agree | 6 (100%) | 13 (93%) | 7 (64%) | 9 (60%) |
| Applicable Skills Learnt |
|
|
|
|
| Agree | 2 (33%) | 1 (7.1%) | 3 (27%) | 1 (6.7%) |
| Strongly Agree | 4 (67%) | 13 (93%) | 8 (73%) | 14 (93%) |
| Share Skills |
|
|
|
|
| Agree | 1 (17%) | 2 (14%) | 4 (36%) | 4 (27%) |
| Neutral | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (6.7%) |
| Strongly Agree | 5 (83%) | 12 (86%) | 7 (64%) | 10 (67%) |
| Overall Usefulness |
|
|
|
|
| Agree | 0 (0%) | 1 (7.1%) | 4 (36%) | 5 (33%) |
| Neutral | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (9.1%) | 0 (0%) |
| Strongly Agree | 6 (100%) | 13 (93%) | 6 (55%) | 10 (67%) |
| 1 n (%) | ||||
Page 4
Column 6
Chart Breakdown of Quality of Training
| Characteristic | Communication training for CSCs, N = 61 | Diversity and Inclusion of CSCs, N = 141 | Somcas, N = 111 | Valuation, N = 151 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Training Organisation |
|
|
|
|
| Agree | 1 (17%) | 2 (14%) | 1 (9.1%) | 4 (27%) |
| Disagree | 1 (17%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
| Neutral | 0 (0%) | 1 (7.1%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (6.7%) |
| Strongly agree | 4 (67%) | 11 (79%) | 10 (91%) | 10 (67%) |
| Adequate Breaks |
|
|
|
|
| Agree | 0 (0%) | 4 (29%) | 2 (18%) | 6 (40%) |
| Neutral | 1 (17%) | 1 (7.1%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
| Strongly agree | 5 (83%) | 9 (64%) | 9 (82%) | 9 (60%) |
| Useful Training Material |
|
|
|
|
| Agree | 2 (33%) | 1 (7.1%) | 1 (9.1%) | 6 (40%) |
| Neutral | 1 (17%) | 1 (7.1%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
| Strongly agree | 3 (50%) | 11 (79%) | 10 (91%) | 9 (60%) |
| Strongly disagree | 0 (0%) | 1 (7.1%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
| Problems Resolved |
|
|
|
|
| Agree | 1 (17%) | 2 (14%) | 1 (9.1%) | 4 (27%) |
| Neutral | 1 (17%) | 2 (14%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
| Strongly agree | 4 (67%) | 9 (64%) | 10 (91%) | 11 (73%) |
| Strongly disagree | 0 (0%) | 1 (7.1%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
| Pace of Training |
|
|
|
|
| Agree | 1 (17%) | 4 (29%) | 3 (27%) | 3 (20%) |
| Neutral | 1 (17%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
| Strongly agree | 4 (67%) | 10 (71%) | 8 (73%) | 12 (80%) |
| Training was Engaging |
|
|
|
|
| Agree | 0 (0%) | 2 (14%) | 2 (18%) | 3 (20%) |
| Disagree | 1 (17%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
| Neutral | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (9.1%) | 0 (0%) |
| Strongly agree | 5 (83%) | 12 (86%) | 8 (73%) | 12 (80%) |
| 1 n (%) | ||||