Healthy Central
Valley Together Update
https://healthycvtogether.org/data-main/
Healthy Central Valley Together Update
Last compiled on 10/23/2023
Last compiled on 10/23/2023
Please see below for the latest update on Merced, Stanislaus, and Yolo County wastewater data.
- Weeks 101-102: 09/24 - 10/07
- Weeks 103-104: 10/08 - 10/21
General Update at County Level
For each county, the aggregated trend is population-weighted. It is calculated using the 10-days trimmed average for each site. For each date, an individual site trimmed smoothed value for the day is multiplied by the plant’s population, then these are summed and divided by the total population of all sites.
Table: Percentage of change
| Percent change | |||
| Virus | Merced County | Stanislaus County | Yolo County |
|---|---|---|---|
| SARS-CoV-2 | 42.4% | 72% | 42.4% |
| Influenza A | +7.3% | 94.4% | 86% |
| Influenza B | 42.4% | 72% | 42.4% |
| RSV | 65.2% | ND | 97.6% |
| HMPV | ND | ND | +588.4% |
| Norovirus | +25.4% | 52.7% | 44.7% |
| Hepatitis A Virus | ND | ND | ND |
| Human Adenovirus Group F | 25.9% | 63.5% | 84.1% |
| Rotavirus | 68.3% | 23% | 19.7% |
| Enterovirus D68 | ND | ND | ND |
| Candida auris | ND | ND | ND |
| Parainfluenza | +35.5% | +87.9% | +63.9% |
| Percent change is calculated here using average of measurements over the past two weeks compared to the average of measurements from the prior two weeks. | |||
| ND- Non-detect (below detection limit) | |||
| +LL increasing but at low levels | |||
| Weeks 101-102: 09/24 - 10/07 | |||
| Weeks 103-104: 10/08 - 10/21 | |||
Current wastewater level
| Current wastewater level | |||
| Virus | Merced County | Stanislaus County | Yolo County |
|---|---|---|---|
| SARS-CoV-2 | Low | Low | Medium |
| Influenza A | High | High | Medium |
| Influenza B | Low | Low | Medium |
| RSV | Medium | Low | Low |
| HMPV | Low | Low | Medium |
| Norovirus | Low | Low | Low |
| Hepatitis A Virus | Low | Low | Low |
| Human Adenovirus Group F | High | High | High |
| Rotavirus | High | High | High |
| Enterovirus D68 | Low | Low | Low |
| Candida auris | Low | Low | Low |
| Parainfluenza | High | High | High |
| The current wastewater levels are estimated using the 10-day rolling average (10-d.m.a). The 33rd and 66th percentiles are calculated over the past 365 days before 14 days ago. For counties with less than 365 days, all days before 14 days ago are used. The current wastewater level is classified as: | |||
| • Low: The current 10-dma is below 33rd percentile | |||
| • Medium: The current 10-dma is between the 33rd and 66th percentile | |||
| • High: The current 10-dma is above 66th Percentile | |||
Trend test at county level
Relative Strength Index
| The Relative Strength Index | |||
| Virus | Merced County | Stanislaus County | Yolo County |
|---|---|---|---|
| SARS-CoV-2 | Very likely downward | Very likely downward | Likely downward |
| Influenza A | No Trend | No Trend | Very likely downward |
| Influenza B | Very likely downward | Very likely downward | Likely downward |
| RSV | Likely downward | Likely downward | Very likely downward |
| HMPV | Very likely downward | No Data | No Trend |
| Norovirus | No Trend | Very likely downward | Very likely downward |
| Hepatitis A Virus | No Data | No Data | No Data |
| Human Adenovirus Group F | No Trend | Very likely downward | Very likely downward |
| Rotavirus | Very likely downward | Downward | No Trend |
| Enterovirus D68 | No Data | No Data | Very likely downward |
| Candida auris | No Data | No Data | No Data |
| Parainfluenza | No Trend | No Trend | No Trend |
| Week 104: 10/08 - 10/21 | |||
| * The Relative Strength Index (RSI) calculates a ratio of the recent upward price movements to the absolute price movement. Developed by J. Welles Wilder. | |||
Mann-Kendall trend test
| Mann-Kendall trend test | |||
| Virus | Merced County | Stanislaus County | Yolo County |
|---|---|---|---|
| SARS-CoV-2 | Very likely downward | Very likely downward | Very likely downward |
| Influenza A | No Trend | Very likely downward | Likely downward |
| Influenza B | Very likely downward | Very likely downward | Very likely downward |
| RSV | Very likely downward | Very likely downward | Very likely downward |
| HMPV | No Data | No Data | No Trend |
| Norovirus | No Trend | Very likely downward | Very likely downward |
| Hepatitis A Virus | No Data | No Data | No Data |
| Human Adenovirus Group F | Very likely downward | Very likely downward | Very likely downward |
| Rotavirus | Very likely downward | Very likely downward | Likely downward |
| Enterovirus D68 | No Data | No Data | Very likely downward |
| Candida auris | No Data | No Data | No Data |
| Parainfluenza | No Trend | No Trend | Downward |
| Week 104: 10/08 - 10/21 | |||
| * The Mann-Kendall (MK) trend test is a nonparametric test that evaluates whether there is a monotonic trend in a time-series dataset. We applied the MK trend test to raw N/PMMoV data and used a 14-day lookback period. We interpreted positive values of the test statistic, tau (τ), with p ≤ 0.1, p ≤ 0.05, and p ≤ 0.01 as upward, likely upward, and very likely upward trends, respectively. We interpreted negative τ values with p ≤ 0.1, p ≤ 0.05, and p ≤ 0.01 as downward, likely downward, and very likely downward trends, respectively. | |||
Percent change (PC)
| Percent change in the last 14 days | |||
| Virus | Merced County | Stanislaus County | Yolo County |
|---|---|---|---|
| SARS-CoV-2 | Very likely downward | Very likely downward | Very likely downward |
| Influenza A | No Trend | Very likely downward | Downward |
| Influenza B | Very likely downward | Very likely downward | Very likely downward |
| RSV | Very likely downward | Very likely downward | Very likely downward |
| HMPV | No Trend | No Trend | No Trend |
| Norovirus | No Trend | Very likely downward | Very likely downward |
| Hepatitis A Virus | No Trend | No Trend | No Trend |
| Human Adenovirus Group F | Very likely downward | Very likely downward | Very likely downward |
| Rotavirus | Very likely downward | Very likely downward | Very likely downward |
| Enterovirus D68 | No Trend | No Trend | Very likely downward |
| Candida auris | No Trend | No Trend | No Trend |
| Parainfluenza | No Trend | Likely downward | Likely downward |
| Week 104: 10/08 - 10/21 | |||
| * The slope is calculated from a least-squares linear regression of log10-transformed values of the N/PMMoV data versus day. We used a 14-day look-back period to calculate the slope. For each slope estimate, we extracted the 90%, 95%, and 99% confidence intervals (CIs) to calculate the 90%, 95%, and 99% CIs for each PC estimate. We interpreted PC values greater than 0 for the 90%, 95%, and 99% upper CIs as upward, likely upward, and very likely upward trends, respectively. We interpreted PC values less than 0 for the 90%, 95%, and 99% lower CIs as downward, likely downward, and very likely downward trends day and previous n - 1 days. | |||
Trend and effective reproductive number at county level
The embedded graph shows the effective reproductive number, Rt, which is the expected number of new infections caused by a single infectious person where some individuals may no longer be susceptible. It used to assess whether the epidemic is growing (>1), shrinking (<1), or holding steady (~1). To compute Rt from wastewater data, we utilize a proxy of the cases derived from the smoothed SARS-CoV-2 RNA concentration. The process involves dividing the smoothed concentration by the minimum concentration observed in the treatment plant. This normalization step ensures that the minimum concentration corresponds to a value of \(1\), serving as a reference point. Next, we multiply the normalized concentration by a scalar value, k; which we set as 3,1,3 for Merced, Stanislaus, and Yolo, respectively. This assumption implies that the minimum concentration observed in the treatment plant corresponds to approximately 4 infected individuals. The choice of k is not critical for calculating since it is scale-free.
The formula for computing the proxy of cases from wastewater data is as follows: \[I_{ww}= k \frac{C_{RNA}}{min {(C_{RNA})}}\] where \(C_{RNA} = (C_1,\ldots,C_n)\) represents the smoothed concentration vector at different time points. By applying this formula, we obtain a proxy of the cases based on the wastewater data.
Merced County
Stanislaus County
Yolo County
General Update at City Level
Table: Percentage of change
| Percent change | ||||||||
| Virus | Merced County | Stanislaus County | Yolo County | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Merced | Los Banos | Modesto | Turlock | Davis | Esparto | Winters | Woodland | |
| SARS-CoV-2 | 7% | 10.1% | 85.4% | +48.7% | 13.4% | +40.7% | +118.8% | 7.5% |
| Influenza A | 5% | 17.4% | 9% | 42.9% | ND | ND | ND | +LL |
| Influenza B | ND | +2.9% | ND | +LL | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| RSV | 72.3% | +144% | ND | ND | 89.7% | ND | ND | ND |
| HMPV | ND | +LL | ND | ND | +LL | ND | ND | +LL |
| Norovirus | +163.3% | +127.1% | 37.5% | 28.9% | +167.8% | +128.6% | +72.6% | +5.1% |
| Hepatitis A Virus | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | +LL |
| Human Adenovirus Group F | 55.5% | +67.5% | 48.1% | +319.9% | 86.9% | +64.6% | ND | +102.2% |
| Rotavirus | +41.5% | 82.6% | 50% | 69.9% | 68.9% | ND | ND | +687.4% |
| Enterovirus D68 | ND | ND | +LL | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| Candida auris | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| Parainfluenza | +130.3% | +517% | +105.9% | 12.1% | 20.6% | 11.6% | 2.3% | +1338.8% |
| Percent change is calculated here using average of measurements over the past two weeks compared to the average of measurements from the prior two weeks. | ||||||||
| ND- Non-detect (below detection limit) | ||||||||
| +LL increasing but at low levels | ||||||||
| Weeks 101-102: 09/24 - 10/07 | ||||||||
| Weeks 103-104: 10/08 - 10/21 | ||||||||
Current wastewater level
| Current wastewater level | ||||||||
| Virus | Merced County | Stanislaus County | Yolo County | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Merced | Los Banos | Modesto | Turlock | Davis | Esparto | Winters | Woodland | |
| SARS-CoV-2 | Low | Medium | Low | Medium | High | Low | Medium | Medium |
| Influenza A | High | High | High | High | Low | Low | Low | High |
| Influenza B | Low | High | Low | High | Low | Low | Low | Low |
| RSV | Medium | High | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low |
| HMPV | Low | Medium | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low | High |
| Norovirus | Medium | Low | Low | Low | Low | Medium | Medium | Low |
| Hepatitis A Virus | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low | High |
| Human Adenovirus Group F | Medium | High | Low | Medium | Low | Medium | Low | Medium |
| Rotavirus | Low | Low | Medium | High | Low | Low | Low | High |
| Enterovirus D68 | Low | Low | High | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low |
| Candida auris | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low |
| Parainfluenza | High | High | High | High | High | High | High | High |
| The current wastewater levels are estimated using the 10-day rolling average (10-d.m.a). The 33rd and 66th percentiles are calculated over the past 365 days before 14 days ago. For cities with less than 365 days, all days before 14 days ago are used. The current wastewater level is classified as: | ||||||||
| • Low: The current 10-dma is below 33rd percentile | ||||||||
| • Medium: The current 10-dma is between the 33rd and 66th percentile | ||||||||
| • High: The current 10-dma is above 66th Percentile | ||||||||
Tab: Trend test at city level
Table 1: Percent change (PC)
| Percent change in the last 14 days | ||||||||
| Virus | Merced County | Stanislaus County | Yolo County | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Merced | Los Banos | Modesto | Turlock | Davis | Esparto | Winters | Woodland | |
| SARS-CoV-2 | Very likely upward | No Trend | Very likely upward | Upward | No Trend | No Trend | No Trend | No Trend |
| Influenza A | Upward | Downward | No Trend | No Trend | No Trend | No Trend | No Trend | Upward |
| Influenza B | No Trend | No Trend | No Trend | No Trend | No Trend | No Trend | No Trend | No Trend |
| RSV | Downward | Upward | Very likely downward | No Trend | Very likely downward | No Trend | No Trend | No Trend |
| HMPV | No Trend | No Trend | No Trend | No Trend | No Trend | No Trend | No Trend | Very likely upward |
| Norovirus | Very likely upward | No Trend | Very likely downward | No Trend | Very likely upward | Very likely downward | Very likely upward | Very likely upward |
| Hepatitis A Virus | No Trend | No Trend | No Trend | No Trend | No Trend | No Trend | No Trend | No Trend |
| Human Adenovirus Group F | Very likely downward | Likely upward | Very likely downward | Likely upward | Very likely downward | Very likely downward | No Trend | Likely upward |
| Rotavirus | Downward | Very likely downward | Likely downward | No Trend | Very likely downward | No Trend | No Trend | Very likely upward |
| Enterovirus D68 | No Trend | No Trend | No Trend | No Trend | No Trend | No Trend | No Trend | No Trend |
| Candida auris | No Trend | No Trend | No Trend | No Trend | No Trend | No Trend | No Trend | No Trend |
| Parainfluenza | Very likely upward | Very likely upward | No Trend | No Trend | Very likely downward | No Trend | Very likely downward | Very likely upward |
| Week 104: 10/08 - 10/21 | ||||||||
| * The slope is calculated from a least-squares linear regression of log10-transformed values of the N/PMMoV data versus day. We used a 14-day look-back period to calculate the slope. For each slope estimate, we extracted the 90%, 95%, and 99% confidence intervals (CIs) to calculate the 90%, 95%, and 99% CIs for each PC estimate. We interpreted PC values greater than 0 for the 90%, 95%, and 99% upper CIs as upward, likely upward, and very likely upward trends, respectively. We interpreted PC values less than 0 for the 90%, 95%, and 99% lower CIs as downward, likely downward, and very likely downward trends day and previous n - 1 days. | ||||||||
Table 2: Relative Strength Index
| The Relative Strength Index | ||||||||
| Virus | Merced County | Stanislaus County | Yolo County | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Merced | Los Banos | Modesto | Turlock | Davis | Esparto | Winters | Woodland | |
| SARS-CoV-2 | No Trend | No Trend | No Trend | Upward | No Trend | No Trend | No Trend | No Trend |
| Influenza A | No Trend | No Trend | No Trend | No Data | No Trend | No Data | No Data | No Trend |
| Influenza B | No Data | No Data | No Data | No Data | No Data | No Data | No Data | No Data |
| RSV | No Trend | Very likely upward | No Trend | Downward | No Trend | No Data | No Trend | No Data |
| HMPV | Very likely downward | No Data | No Data | No Data | No Data | No Data | No Data | No Trend |
| Norovirus | Upward | Upward | Downward | No Trend | Very likely upward | No Trend | Likely upward | No Trend |
| Hepatitis A Virus | No Data | No Data | No Data | No Data | No Data | No Data | No Data | Very likely upward |
| Human Adenovirus Group F | No Trend | Upward | No Trend | Likely upward | No Trend | No Trend | No Data | Upward |
| Rotavirus | No Trend | No Trend | No Trend | No Trend | No Trend | No Data | No Trend | Very likely upward |
| Enterovirus D68 | No Data | No Data | No Data | No Data | No Data | No Data | No Data | No Trend |
| Candida auris | No Data | No Data | No Data | No Data | No Data | No Data | No Data | No Data |
| Parainfluenza | No Trend | No Trend | No Trend | No Trend | No Trend | No Trend | No Trend | No Trend |
| Week 104: 10/08 - 10/21 | ||||||||
| * The Relative Strength Index (RSI) calculates a ratio of the recent upward price movements to the absolute price movement. Developed by J. Welles Wilder. | ||||||||
Table 3: Mann-Kendall trend test
| Mann-Kendall trend test | ||||||||
| Virus | Merced County | Stanislaus County | Yolo County | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Merced | Los Banos | Modesto | Turlock | Davis | Esparto | Winters | Woodland | |
| SARS-CoV-2 | Very likely upward | No Trend | Very likely upward | Upward | No Trend | No Trend | No Trend | No Trend |
| Influenza A | Likely upward | No Trend | No Trend | No Data | No Data | No Data | No Data | Very likely upward |
| Influenza B | No Data | No Data | No Data | No Data | No Data | No Data | No Data | No Data |
| RSV | Downward | Very likely upward | Very likely downward | No Trend | Very likely downward | No Data | No Trend | No Data |
| HMPV | No Data | No Data | No Data | No Data | No Data | No Data | No Data | No Trend |
| Norovirus | Very likely upward | No Trend | Very likely downward | No Trend | Very likely upward | Very likely downward | No Trend | Very likely upward |
| Hepatitis A Virus | No Data | No Data | No Data | No Data | No Data | No Data | No Data | No Trend |
| Human Adenovirus Group F | Very likely downward | Likely upward | Likely downward | Upward | Very likely downward | Likely downward | No Data | No Trend |
| Rotavirus | No Trend | Very likely downward | No Trend | No Trend | Very likely downward | No Data | Likely downward | Very likely upward |
| Enterovirus D68 | No Data | No Data | No Data | No Data | No Data | No Data | No Data | No Trend |
| Candida auris | No Data | No Data | No Data | No Data | No Data | No Data | No Data | No Data |
| Parainfluenza | Very likely upward | Likely upward | No Trend | No Trend | Very likely downward | No Trend | Very likely downward | Very likely upward |
| Week 104: 10/08 - 10/21 | ||||||||
| * The Mann-Kendall (MK) trend test is a nonparametric test that evaluates whether there is a monotonic trend in a time-series dataset. We applied the MK trend test to raw N/PMMoV data and used a 14-day lookback period. We interpreted positive values of the test statistic, tau (τ), with p ≤ 0.1, p ≤ 0.05, and p ≤ 0.01 as upward, likely upward, and very likely upward trends, respectively. We interpreted negative τ values with p ≤ 0.1, p ≤ 0.05, and p ≤ 0.01 as downward, likely downward, and very likely downward trends, respectively. | ||||||||
Merced County
SARS-CoV-2
Merced’s average SARS-CoV-2 concentrations (N/PMMoV) decreased ⬇️ by 7% between the most recent two weeks and the two weeks prior to that. Los Banos’ average decreased ⬇️ by 10.1%.
Fig 1. Merced
Fig 2. Los Banos
Influenza A
Merced’s average Influenza A concentrations (Flu A/PMMoV) decreased ⬇️ by 5% between the most recent two weeks and the two weeks prior to that. Los Banos’ average decreased ⬇️ by 17.4%.
Influenza B
Merced’s average Influenza B concentrations (Flu B/PMMoV) showed no detection between the most recent two weeks and the two weeks prior to that. Los Banos’ average remained the same 🔄.
RSV
Merced’s average RSV concentrations (RSV/PMMoV) decreased ⬇️ by 72.3% between the most recent two weeks and the two weeks prior to that. Los Banos’ average increased ⬆️ by 144%.
HMPV
Merced’s HMPV concentrations (HMPV/PMMoV) showed no detection between the most recent two weeks and the two weeks prior to that. Los Banos’s average +LL.
Norovirus
Merced’s average Norovirus concentrations (Norovirus/PMMoV) increased ⬆️ by 163.3% between the most recent two weeks and the two weeks prior to that. Los Banos’ average increased ⬆️ by 127.1%.
Hepatitis A Virus
Merced’s average Hepatitis A Virus concentrations (HAV/PMMoV) showed no detection between the most recent two weeks and the two weeks prior to that. Los Banos’ average showed no detection.
Human Adenovirus Group F
Merced’s average Human Adenovirus Group F concentrations (HAdV_F/PMMoV) decreased ⬇️ by 55.5% between the most recent two weeks and the two weeks prior to that. Los Banos’ average increased ⬆️ by 67.5%.
Rotavirus
Merced’s average Rotavirus concentrations (Rotavirus/PMMoV) increased ⬆️ by 41.5% between the most recent two weeks and the two weeks prior to that. Los Banos’ average decreased ⬇️ by 82.6%.
Enterovirus D68
Merced’s average Enterovirus D68 concentrations (EV_D68/PMMoV) showed no detection between the most recent two weeks and the two weeks prior to that. Los Banos’ average showed no detection.
Candida auris
Merced’s average Candida auris concentrations (C_auris/PMMoV) showed no detection between the most recent two weeks and the two weeks prior to that. Los Banos’ average showed no detection.
Parainfluenza
Merced’s average Parainfluenza concentrations (HPIV/PMMoV) increased ⬆️ by 130.3% between the most recent two weeks and the two weeks prior to that. Los Banos’ average increased ⬆️ by 517%.
Stanislaus County
SARS-CoV-2
Modesto’s average SARS-CoV-2 concentrations (N/PMMoV) decreased ⬇️ by 85.4% between the most recent two weeks and the two weeks prior to that. Turlock’s average increased ⬆️ by 48.7%.
Fig 1. Modesto
Fig 2. Turlock
Influenza A
Modesto’s average Influenza A concentrations (Flu A/PMMoV) decreased ⬇️ by 9% between the most recent two weeks and the two weeks prior to that. Turlock’s average decreased ⬇️ by 42.9%.
Influenza B
Modesto’s average Influenza B concentrations (Flu B/PMMoV) showed no detection between the most recent two weeks and the two weeks prior to that. Turlock’s average +LL.
RSV
Modesto’s average RSV concentrations (RSV/PMMoV) showed no detection between the most recent two weeks and the two weeks prior to that. Turlock’s average showed no detection.
HMPV
Modesto’s average HMPV concentrations (HMPV/PMMoV) showed no detection between the most recent two weeks and the two weeks prior to that. Turlock’s average showed no detection.
Norovirus
Modesto’s average Norovirus concentrations (Norovirus/PMMoV) decreased ⬇️ by 37.5% between the most recent two weeks and the two weeks prior to that. Turlock’s average decreased ⬇️ by 28.9%.
Hepatitis A Virus
Modesto’s average Hepatitis A Virus concentrations (HAV/PMMoV) showed no detection between the most recent two weeks and the two weeks prior to that. Turlock’s average showed no detection.
Human Adenovirus Group F
Modesto’s average Human Adenovirus Group F concentrations (HAdV_F/PMMoV) decreased ⬇️ by 48.1% between the most recent two weeks and the two weeks prior to that. Turlock’s average increased ⬆️ by 319.9%.
Rotavirus
Modesto’s average Rotavirus concentrations (Rotavirus/PMMoV) decreased ⬇️ by 50% between the most recent two weeks and the two weeks prior to that. Turlock’s average decreased ⬇️ by 69.9%.
Enterovirus D68
Modesto’s average Enterovirus D68 concentrations (EV_D68/PMMoV) +LL between the most recent two weeks and the two weeks prior to that. Turlock’s average showed no detection.
Candida auris
Modesto’s average Candida auris concentrations (C_auris/PMMoV) showed no detection between the most recent two weeks and the two weeks prior to that. Turlock’s average showed no detection.
Parainfluenza
Modesto’s average Parainfluenza concentrations (HPIV/PMMoV) increased ⬆️ by 105.9% between the most recent two weeks and the two weeks prior to that. Turlock’s average decreased ⬇️ by 12.1%.
Yolo County
SARS-CoV-2
Davis’ average SARS-CoV-2 concentrations (N/PMMoV) decreased ⬇️ by 13.4% between the most recent two weeks and the two weeks prior to that. Esparto’s average increased ⬆️ by 40.7%. Winters’ average increased ⬆️ by 118.8%. Woodland’s average decreased ⬇️ by 7.5%.
Fig 1. Davis
Fig 2. Esparto
Fig 3. Winters
Fig 4. Woodland
Influenza A
Davis’ average Influenza A concentrations (Flu A/PMMoV) showed no detection between the most recent two weeks and the two weeks prior to that. Esparto’s average showed no detection. Winters’ average showed no detection. Woodland’s average +LL.
Influenza B
Davis’ average Influenza B concentrations (Flu B/PMMoV) showed no detection between the most recent two weeks and the two weeks prior to that. Esparto’s average showed no detection. Winters’ average showed no detection. Woodland’s average showed no detection.
RSV
Davis’ average RSV concentrations (RSV/PMMoV) decreased ⬇️ by 89.7% between the most recent two weeks and the two weeks prior to that. Esparto’s average showed no detection. Winters’ average showed no detection. Woodland’s average showed no detection.
HMPV
Davis’ HMPV concentrations (HMPV/PMMoV) +LL between the most recent two weeks and the two weeks prior to that. Esparto’s average showed no detection. Winters’ average showed no detection. Woodland’s average +LL.
Norovirus
Davis’ Norovirus concentrations (Norovirus/PMMoV) increased ⬆️ by 167.8% between the most recent two weeks and the two weeks prior to that. Esparto’s average increased ⬆️ by 128.6%. Winters’ average increased ⬆️ by 72.6%. Woodland’s average increased ⬆️ by 5.1%.
Hepatitis A Virus
Davis’ Hepatitis A Virus concentrations (HAV/PMMoV) showed no detection between the most recent two weeks and the two weeks prior to that. Esparto’s average showed no detection. Winters’ average showed no detection. Woodland’s average +LL.
Human Adenovirus Group F
Davis’ Human Adenovirus Group F concentrations (HAdV/PMMoV) decreased ⬇️ by 86.9% between the most recent two weeks and the two weeks prior to that. Esparto’s average increased ⬆️ by 64.6%. Winters’ average showed no detection. Woodland’s average increased ⬆️ by 102.2%.
Rotavirus
Davis’ Rotavirus concentrations (Rotavirus/PMMoV) decreased ⬇️ by 68.9% between the most recent two weeks and the two weeks prior to that. Esparto’s average showed no detection. Winters’ average showed no detection. Woodland’s average increased ⬆️ by 687.4%.
Enterovirus D68
Davis’ Enterovirus D68 concentrations (EV_D68/PMMoV) showed no detection between the most recent two weeks and the two weeks prior to that. Esparto’s average showed no detection. Winters’ average showed no detection. Woodland’s average showed no detection.
Candida auris
Davis’ Candida auris concentrations (C_auris/PMMoV) showed no detection between the most recent two weeks and the two weeks prior to that. Esparto’s average showed no detection. Winters’ average showed no detection. Woodland’s average showed no detection.
Parainfluenza
Davis’ Parainfluenza concentrations (HPIV/PMMoV) decreased ⬇️ by 20.6% between the most recent two weeks and the two weeks prior to that. Esparto’s average decreased ⬇️ by 11.6%. Winters’ average remained the same 🔄. Woodland’s average increased ⬆️ by 1338.8%.
All Counties
Mpox Update
There are no detections for samples taken at our plants from the last two weeks. https://healthycvtogether.org/monkeypox-data/