# Load packages
# Core
library(tidyverse)
library(tidyquant)
Visualize and compare skewness of your portfolio and its assets.
Choose your stocks.
from 2012-12-31 to 2017-12-31
five stocks: “SPY”, “EFA”, “IJS”, “EEM”, “AGG”
symbols <- c("SPY", "EFA", "IJS", "EEM", "AGG")
prices <- tq_get(x = symbols,
get = "stock.prices",
from = "2012-12-31",
to = "2017-12-31")
asset_returns_tbl <- prices %>%
group_by(symbol) %>%
tq_transmute(select = adjusted,
mutate_fun = periodReturn,
period = "monthly",
type = "log") %>%
slice(-1) %>%
ungroup() %>%
set_names(c("asset", "date", "returns"))
# symbols
symbols <- asset_returns_tbl %>% distinct(asset) %>% pull()
symbols
## [1] "AGG" "EEM" "EFA" "IJS" "SPY"
# weights
weights <- c(0.25, 0.25, 0.2, 0.2, 0.1)
weights
## [1] 0.25 0.25 0.20 0.20 0.10
w_tbl <- tibble(symbols, weights)
w_tbl
## # A tibble: 5 × 2
## symbols weights
## <chr> <dbl>
## 1 AGG 0.25
## 2 EEM 0.25
## 3 EFA 0.2
## 4 IJS 0.2
## 5 SPY 0.1
# ?tq_portfolio
portfolio_returns_tbl <- asset_returns_tbl %>%
tq_portfolio(assets_col = asset,
returns_col = returns,
weights = w_tbl,
rebalance_on = "months",
col_rename = "returns")
portfolio_returns_tbl
## # A tibble: 60 × 2
## date returns
## <date> <dbl>
## 1 2013-01-31 0.0204
## 2 2013-02-28 -0.00239
## 3 2013-03-28 0.0121
## 4 2013-04-30 0.0174
## 5 2013-05-31 -0.0128
## 6 2013-06-28 -0.0247
## 7 2013-07-31 0.0321
## 8 2013-08-30 -0.0224
## 9 2013-09-30 0.0511
## 10 2013-10-31 0.0301
## # ℹ 50 more rows
portfolio_returns_tbl %>%
tq_performance(Ra = returns,
Rb = NULL,
performance_fun = table.Stats) %>%
select(Skewness)
## # A tibble: 1 × 1
## Skewness
## <dbl>
## 1 -0.168
Is any asset in your portfolio more likely to return extreme positive
returns than your portfolio collectively? Discuss in terms of skewness.
You may also refer to the distribution of returns you plotted in Code
along 4.
There is no other asset in my portfolio that is more likely to return positive returns than my portfolio overall. With a skewness of -0.168, the data in the portfolio set are nearly symmetrical. It was quite interesting referring back to the distributions of returns in Code Along 4 to make comparisons.